As far as Obama is concerned, I was ready to jump on his bandwagon, but then NH voted.  The very next morning his campaign starts acting weird and tone-deaf.  This example you cite is one more drop in the bucket.

He keeps going out of his way to sound so bi-partisan and centrist it's making me sick.

They were very touching and sincere and typified, I think, the reason young people are so drawn to him. Their entire political life, George Bush has been president and the congress has either been an arm of the Bush regime or ineffective at curbing it. They're not convinced Washington can work, so Obama's sort of vague promises to "change Washington" are very appealing. The older people in the crowd, with more life experience and having lived through more presidents, had really practical bread and butter questions, whether about making joining a union easier, Yucca Mountain, health care and immigration reform. It was a striking difference.

I'm so sick of people who don't support Obama deciding that since i do and I'm young i must be naive, and not know about issues.  Maybe a more accurate analysis would be that young people go online and look up policies, rather then go to speeches and expect to hear about them.

Does any one really believe that we are living easy, we graduate school with 20,000 plus of debt, are less likely to get insurance from work, and have almost no job security.

It's interesting to watch the candidates try to walk a fine line on this issue.  Clinton clearly wants a path to citizenship and I think Obama does too.  But it's also clear that a substantial portion of the U.S. population is very concerned about what they perceive as the growing number of undocumented workers.  Are these concerns driven by racism?  To some extent I'm sure they are, but I also think they're driven by economic fears.  Certainly parts of the Republican party have sought to blame the undocumented for problems ranging from wage stagnation to healthcare - in an attempt to get folks not to blame Republicans, of course.

I know Hillary has done a lot for family reunification, but I don't know if it's just for families of those lawfully present or the undocumented as well. And she has supported worker's rights, not just employer sanctions.

From her Senate website:

    The solution must also protect the sanctity of families and repair the broken, unfair bureaucratic system that forces citizens and lawful immigrants to live apart from their spouses and children.

    I was a strong supporter of the efforts to negotiate a comprehensive immigration reform package in the last two sessions of Congress. Earlier this year, I introduced a bipartisan measure to reunite hundreds of thousands of lawful permanent residents in this country with their spouses and minor children. I have also led efforts for the Immigrant Children's Health Improvement Act, championed the Access to Employment and English Acquisition Act, and co-sponsored the DREAM Act, which makes it possible for hardworking young people to attend college. Finally, I am proud to have joined Senator Larry Craig (R-ID), Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), and a bipartisan coalition of dozens of Senators as a cosponsor to the Agricultural Job Opportunity Benefits and Security Act of 2003, legislation that is essential to establishing an effective, legal workforce for the agricultural sector in New York State and throughout the country.

From her presidential candidate website:

   And Hillary understands that our immigration policies have a direct impact on American workers. She opposes a guest worker program that exploits workers and creates a supply of cheap labor that undermines the wages of U.S. workers. Hillary believes all workers deserve safe conditions and decent wages. She supports an Ag Jobs program, which will keep our agricultural industry vibrant while enabling agricultural workers to receive the fair wages and labor protections they ought to receive.

http://clinton.senate.gov/issues/immigration/

Q: Is this country gradually going to become more a Spanish-speaking country, and should we accept that?

A: Well, there's three different points here. First, we need to have English as a common, unifying language. It's an important part of who we are and how we keep this big, diverse country of ours going. Secondly, there are a lot of Americans who are citizens who speak different languages. I represent New York City. I think there's, like, 170 languages and dialects; the city would be in total chaos if people didn't get some services and some help in the language that they actually understood.

And thirdly, make it clear that we do expect people who want to become legal in America to try to learn English. But that doesn't mean that they have to give up the language that they originally had, but we have to do more with English as second language, more help in schools, to get people to be able to speak and comprehend English