<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0" xml:base="http://telecompetitor.com">
<channel>
 <title>Telecompetitor - </title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com</link>
 <description />
 <language>en</language>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Telecompetitor" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelecompetitor" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelecompetitor" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelecompetitor" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.rojo.com/add-subscription?resource=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelecompetitor" src="http://blog.rojo.com/RojoWideRed.gif">Subscribe with Rojo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/Telecompetitor" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelecompetitor" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelecompetitor" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelecompetitor" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.plusmo.com/add?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelecompetitor" src="http://plusmo.com/res/graphics/fbplusmo.gif">Subscribe with Plusmo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://my.feedlounge.com/external/subscribe?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelecompetitor" src="http://static.feedlounge.com/buttons/subscribe_0.gif">Subscribe with FeedLounge</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelecompetitor" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.dailyrotation.com/index.php?feed=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTelecompetitor" src="http://www.dailyrotation.com/rss-dr2.gif">Subscribe with Daily Rotation</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:browserFriendly>Thanks for your interest in Telecompetitor, the web's leading forum telecom competition news, opinions, and interaction. Please select your preferred feed to the right.</feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
 <title>AT&amp;T Wants to Kill Sprint-Clearwire Venture</title>
 <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~3/345785026/740</link>
 
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/740#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/20">AT&amp;amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/116">Clearwire</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/52">Sprint</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/81">WiMAX</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:46:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">740 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
<description>AT&amp;amp;T announced their intention to oppose the Sprint-Clearwire venture. AT&amp;amp;T says the regulatory review process isn’t robust enough because Sprint and Clearwire are under reporting the amount of spectrum they will actually utilize. AT&amp;amp;T argues that if all the spectrum represented by the Sprint-Clearwire merger were represented, the FCC would have to scrutinize the merger more closely....&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~4/345785026" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://telecompetitor.com/node/740</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Vonage Gets Another Temporary Lifeline</title>
 <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~3/345290372/739</link>
 
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/739#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/29">VoIP</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/62">Vonage</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">739 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
<description>Vonage has a deal in principle to refinance the debt that is threatening to bankrupt  the company later this year in December. A new financing deal structure will be lead by Silver Point Finance. It’s a fairly complex deal, requiring Vonage to gain additional financing to cover the total $253 million in debt coming due this December. Under the agreement, Silver Point will provide $125 million,...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~4/345290372" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://telecompetitor.com/node/739</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Let it Go to Voicemail, It’s Comcast</title>
 <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~3/345269348/738</link>
 
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/738#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/167">caller ID</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/49">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/80">Convergence</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:24:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">738 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
<description>Comcast is joining the caller ID on the television party. While a little late to the party, they plan on moving aggressively into the converged communications arena with other services as well. Caller ID TV will be available in August, followed by caller ID on the PC and visual voicemail for the TV early next year. Other cable MSOs including Cablevision have been offering Caller ID TV for some...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~4/345269348" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://telecompetitor.com/node/738</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Is U-Verse Worth it?</title>
 <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~3/344041951/737</link>
 
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/737#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/108">cable telephony</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/58">IPTV</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/47">Triple Play</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/21">U-verse</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/22">Wireless</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:33:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">737 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
<description>AT&amp;amp;T released their latest quarterly numbers, revealing the progress of U-Verse and their other business lines. Depending on your point of view, U-Verse is either progressing nicely or is woefully inadequate. AT&amp;amp;T’s PR spin indicates the former, but the real view is only available to AT&amp;amp;T insiders, analysts, and the “flies on the boardroom wall.” If you place U-Verse’s video...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~4/344041951" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://telecompetitor.com/node/737</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Verizon/Alltel Divestiture Carries Competitive Implications</title>
 <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~3/343939840/736</link>
 
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/736#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/119">Alltel</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/340">Mergers</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/33">Verizon</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/22">Wireless</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:25:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">736 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
<description>Ahead of their Alltel acquisition regulatory review, Verizon filed a letter with the FCC outlining their wireless spectrum divestiture plans. In hopes of reducing “market dominance” fears, they plan on divesting of 85 markets, including all of North and South Dakota, and rural serving areas in California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana , Minnesota, Kansas, Illinois, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming,...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~4/343939840" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://telecompetitor.com/node/736</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>XO CEO: Bells Are a "Copper Cartel", Stifling Competition</title>
 <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~3/343130285/735</link>
 
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/735#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/92">CLEC</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/137">XO</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:39:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">735 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
<description>XO Communications CEO Carl J. Grivner testified before Congress, and labeled AT&amp;amp;T, Qwest, and Verizon a “copper cartel” that practices anti-competitive and anti-consumer tactics. Grivner testified before the U.S. House Telecommunications Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, stating that the “…competitive [telecom] industry has been a major source of billions of dollars in...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~4/343130285" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://telecompetitor.com/node/735</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Is Broadband Access a Civil Right?</title>
 <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~3/342596508/734</link>
 
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/734#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/176">broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/32">FCC</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:27:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">734 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
<description>The FCC recently conducted a hearing on the future of broadband and digital media at Carnegie-Mellon University in Pittsburgh. Among the typical fanfare at FCC meetings like this, an interesting point of view emerged from FCC Commissioner Michael Copps. In his opening remarks, Copps likened broadband access to a civil right. In regards to broadband, Copps says, “no matter who you are, where you...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~4/342596508" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://telecompetitor.com/node/734</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Congress: Wireline to Wireless Porting is Too Slow</title>
 <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~3/341571388/730</link>
 
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/730#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/32">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/540">LNP</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/22">Wireless</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:08:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">730 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
<description>In the hyper competitive world of wireless, telephone numbers can be ported to competing carriers within hours. Several members of Congress have written the FCC, demanding comparable portability timelines for wireline to wireless number portability. Currently, porting a number from a wireline carrier to a wireless carrier can take up to four business days. To address the issue, Senate Commerce...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~4/341571388" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://telecompetitor.com/node/730</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Verizon Loses Again</title>
 <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~3/339015200/729</link>
 
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/729#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/32">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/33">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:47:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">729 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
<description>Verizon lost its stay request concerning their win back marketing saga. Cable companies filed a formal complaint with the FCC claiming that Verizon was illegally trying to “court” customers back after they decided to switch phone service to a competing cable company. In a strange turn of events, the FCC Enforcement Bureau sided with Verizon, but FCC commissioners voted in favor of the cable...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~4/339015200" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://telecompetitor.com/node/729</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Verizon Joins "Three Screen" Olympic Club</title>
 <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~3/338425658/728</link>
 
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/728#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/70">Fision</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/539">Three Screens</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/33">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:39:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">728 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
<description>Just a couple days after AT&amp;amp;T announced a three screen Olympics strategy, Verizon followed suit as well. Verizon will also offer Olympics content on the television, PC, and mobile device. It’s unclear if there are exclusive content deals with each carrier, or if subscribers of both services will have virtually the same experience. In addition to the three screen strategy, Verizon announced...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Telecompetitor/~4/338425658" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://telecompetitor.com/node/728</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
