June 4, 2007

‘All we need is some attacks on American soil’

Dennis Milligan, the new chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party, probably shouldn’t sound quite this excited about the prospect of domestic terrorism.

He said he’s “150 percent” behind Bush on the war in Iraq.

“At the end of the day, I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001], and the naysayers will come around very quickly to appreciate not only the commitment for President Bush, but the sacrifice that has been made by men and women to protect this country,” Milligan said.

Does this make any sense at all? Americans will support Bush’s Iraq policy if we experience another 9/11-style attack?

The president’s critics don’t support the troops’ sacrifices?

I have no idea what Milligan is talking about. Then again, I suspect Milligan doesn’t know what he’s talking about, either.

 
Discussion

What do you think? Leave a comment. Alternatively, write a post on your own weblog; this blog accepts trackbacks.

24 Comments
1.
On June 4th, 2007 at 4:57 pm, Anne said:

And another Republican goes down the rabbit hole…

The guy has not gotten the memo about “fighting them over there, so we don’t have to fight them here,” which is a supplement to the memo that says that no attckes here means Bush IS doing a good job.

I guess he hasn’t figured out that if there were to be an attack here, it would completely tear down the facade of security erected by the Chertoff-types, would make those who haven’t been thinking about it too much wonder exactly why it is we have to be spied on if it can’t stop the terrorists, and would expose the charade that Bush flapping his gums about protecting the nation was – and always has been – nothing but talk.

Something tells me that we won’t be hearing much from this guy for a while.

2.
On June 4th, 2007 at 4:57 pm, Racerx said:

Yet another Republican trapped in the Koolaid bottle.

Milligan is dreaming if he thinks the GOP will benefit if/when another attack happens. But dream he does, you can almost see those Bush 90% approval ratings, eh Dennis?

Americans have seen how Republicans respond to terrorism. After 9/11, Bush attacked one of the few leaders in the middle east who wasn’t supporting terrorists.

3.
On June 4th, 2007 at 4:58 pm, Haik Bedrosian said:

This makes perfect sense. The fact we haven’t had another 9-11 on our soil is proof George Bush’s policies are working.

…And another 9-11 on our soil would be proof the policies have not gone far enough, and Bush should be given more power.

There’s no way to win this game.

4.
On June 4th, 2007 at 5:01 pm, Racerx said:

PS, somebody needs to ask Milligan if he thinks Iraq was at all involved in 9/11.

Sounds like he might need a dopeslap.

5.
On June 4th, 2007 at 5:04 pm, The answer is orange said:

Does this make any sense at all? Americans will support Bush’s Iraq policy if we experience another 9/11-style attack?

Wait. Let me take a bunch of acid, snort a presidential amount of coke, shoot up some heroin…

Nope, still looks like complete bullshit. After six years of GOPers shrieking that the only way we can be safe is if we let the Chimperor toss the Bill of Rights out the window with his feces and if Democrats got even the teensiest amount of power we’d all become slaves of Osama bin Laden, another attack will make the people who did the shrieking look a leeetle bit foolish.

“…all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001]”

We’ve heard this before: You’ll be sorry if you don’t listen to King Georgie. But his phrasing makes it one of the creepiest things I’ve ever heard a GOPer say.

6.
On June 4th, 2007 at 5:12 pm, Rian Mueller said:

Only 150% Why the hell isn’t this guy more patriotic? He should be behind the President at least 1000%. Anything less means he hates America and loves terrorism. Hell, I wouldn’t be suprised if he wished there were more terrorist attacks on American soil!

7.
On June 4th, 2007 at 5:26 pm, Swan said:

Stop being such a loser, CB. Here’s some stuff for your ninny ass to check out to help you get with the program:

Red Dawn

Red Scorpion

Mission Impossible

Mission Impossible II

Mission Impossible III

Sheesh.

8.
On June 4th, 2007 at 5:27 pm, Swan said:

What were you doing in school, CB, paying attention to the teacher?

9.
On June 4th, 2007 at 5:37 pm, Former Dan said:

A butchery of Those were the “days”

Once upon a time, there were some ruins
Which we used to start a war or two
Remember how we laughed away the hours,
Think of all the awful things we would do

Those were the days, my friend
We thought they’d never end
We’d bribe and steal forever and a day
We’d decide the reality we’d show
We’d preen and never lose
For we were dumb and sure to have our way

Di di di di di di
Di di di di di di
Di di di di di di di di di di

Then, the reality came rushing right at us
We lost our starry notions on the way
If, by chance, I’d see you in sunk NO,
We’d smile at one another and we’d say

Those were the days, my friend
We thought they’d never end
We’d bribe and steal forever and a day
We’d decide the reality we’d show
We’d preen and never lose
Those were the days, oh yes, those were the days

Di di di di di di
Di di di di di di
Di di di di di di di di di di

Just tonight, I thought about the terror
Nothing seemed the way it used to be
In the glass, I saw a strange reflection
Was that crazy Repub really me?

Those were the days, my friend
We thought they’d never end
We’d bribe and steal forever and a day
We’d decide the reality we’d show
We’d preen and never lose
Those were the days, oh yes, those were the days

Di di di di di di
Di di di di di di
Di di di di di di di di di di
Di di di di di di
Di di di di di di
Di di di di di di di di di di

Through the door, there was maniacal laughter
I saw your face and heard you call my name
Oh, my Prez, we’re older but no wiser
For in the world, we idiots are still the same

Those were the days, my friend
We thought they’d never end
We’d bribe and steal forever and a day
We’d decide the reality we’d show
We’d preen and never lose
Those were the days, oh yes, those were the days

Di di di di di di
Di di di di di di
Di di di di di di di di di di
Di di di di di di
Di di di di di di
Di di di di di di di di di di

La la la la la la
La la la la la la
La la la la la la

10.
On June 4th, 2007 at 5:37 pm, bjobotts said:

He makes “all we need…” sound as if this is what he is hoping for so he can prove some sort of stupid point. You could have terrorist groups “defeated” all around the globe and there will still be someone who wants to attack the great king’s country. And if that person were successful, tragically successful, it still wouldn’t have a damn thing to do with fighting terrorists. This is the logic of idiots coming out of the mouths of a lynch mob mentality which seems to govern the GOP. Just pathetic.

11.
On June 4th, 2007 at 5:51 pm, Bruce Wilder said:

Of course, he’s right. A dramatic attack would arouse the same lizard-brain reactions in lots of people that 9/11 did, and result in more, unthinking support of stupid Bush policies, like the ones Milligan so strongly supports.

Milligan’s judgment is, arguably, poor, because making policy, inspired solely by fear, results in bad policy. That’s why we should fear “fear itself”, in FDR’s memorable phrase. Because it makes us stupid. Not that Bush needed any help in being stupid. But, with help from Rove’s propaganda campaign, it made the American People and large numbers of their representatives in Congress pretty stupid, as well.

Obviously, we are now down to the 28 percenters, like Milligan, who actually prefer stupid, and are nostalgic for the fear that made stupid, a majority preference.

12.
On June 4th, 2007 at 5:57 pm, JKap said:

Dennis Milligan just ascended to the level of Rudolph Hess within the ranks of the Loyal Bushie Browshirt Brigade (aka the Cheney Administration).

One question, where does Rupaul Giuliani stand on Mr. Milligan’s remarks? After all, Rudy claims to have so much first-hand experience with the events of 9/11. It would help if there were a free press in this country.

13.
On June 4th, 2007 at 6:08 pm, JKap said:

Swan @ #8: “What were you doing in school, CB, paying attention to the teacher? “

Hilarious! Thanks for the chuckle! And thanks to CB for being The Carpetbagger!

14.
On June 4th, 2007 at 6:10 pm, Mark said:

The lack of an attack since 9/11 proves that Bush’s policies are protecting us, and another attack would prove that we need more of the same.

15.
On June 4th, 2007 at 6:11 pm, Mark said:

Missed Haik Bedrosian’s post. Sorry for the duplicate.

16.
On June 4th, 2007 at 6:23 pm, The answer is orange said:

Rupaul Giuliani

[Wipes off monitor]

Oh man. Quick, we need t-shirts, bumper stickers, buttons! I think the real Mizz RuPaul would see the humour.

17.
On June 4th, 2007 at 6:36 pm, beep52 said:

The 28-percenters seem to think that America is safer when it kills people who once knew someone who read about someone who worshiped the same as someone who looked like someone who once thought about harming us, Kill ’em all, that’s the ticket. And when killing causes more people to want to harm us, kill them too. My god. These people should be institutionalized.

18.
On June 4th, 2007 at 7:04 pm, JoeW said:

This is classic up is downism. The shorter Milligan goes: If Bush fails in defending our country, we’ll see just how great he’s been at defending our country.
But let’s bump this rationale up a notch to see how it plays: If Bush would nuke the entire Middle East, we’d see that he is a man of peace.

Still batsh*t crazy.

19.
On June 4th, 2007 at 7:50 pm, Steve said:

It sounds to me as if Milligan is fomenting further attacks on American soil. Quick—can we ship his pathetic carcass to Gitmo for a few years?

20.
On June 4th, 2007 at 7:52 pm, George Arndt said:

Is he going to paint targets on office buildings?

21.
On June 4th, 2007 at 10:24 pm, The Answer is Orange said:

I move rename this cretin.
My two choices are:
Mulligan since his intial “shot” needs a do over.
Gilligan in honour of another – though far more loveable – bumbling idiot who was completely lost.

22.
On June 5th, 2007 at 12:05 am, editor said:

Yes, Bush’s policies have kept us safe because we know there hasn’t been another terror attack on US soil since 9/11.
But now that the Dems are in charge of Congress, another terror hit at home would be all their fault and proof that only the Republicans can be trusted to run the country.

Heh.

23.
On June 5th, 2007 at 3:44 am, Tim said:

I would suggest that an enterprising candidate run an ad with Milligan’s statement and McCain’s cheeseball smiley face line about bin Laden during the first repub debate and include a tag line like, “Some people seem to think terrorism is all fun and games.”