March 3, 2008

McCain’s record includes ‘some inconsistencies’

Update: This post has been updated, expanded, and broken down by category.

I’m delighted the NYT noticed.

Senator John McCain likes to present himself as the candidate of the “Straight Talk Express” who does not pander to voters or change his positions with the political breeze. But the fine print of his record in the Senate indicates that he has been a lot less consistent on some of his signature issues than he has presented himself to be so far in his presidential campaign.

Mr. McCain, who derided his onetime Republican competitor Mitt Romney for his political mutability, has himself meandered over the years from position to position on some topics, particularly as he has tried to court the conservatives who have long distrusted him.

For its part, the McCain campaign told the Times that the senator “has evolved rather than switched positions in his 25-year career.” That’s a perfectly sensible spin — when a politician holds one position, and then, for apparently political reasons, decides to embrace the polar opposite position, it’s only natural for his or her aides to say the politician’s position has “evolved.”

But in McCain’s case, the spin is wholly unfulfilling. First, McCain sells himself as a pol who never sways with the wind, and whose willingness to be consistent in the face of pressure is proof of his character. Second, Republicans have spent the last four years or so making policy reversals the single most serious political crime in presidential politics. The dreaded “flip-flop” is, according to the GOP, the latest cardinal sin for someone seeking national office.

And if we’re playing by Republican rules, McCain’s “inconsistencies” should be a fairly serious problem.

With this in mind, for the first time in months, I thought now would be a good time to update the list of John McCain’s Biggest Flip-Flops. There have been some key additions since the last time I did this (in November).

* McCain pledged in February 2008 that he would not, under any circumstances, raise taxes. Specifically, McCain if he were a “‘read my lips’ candidate, no new taxes, no matter what?” referring to George H.W. Bush’s 1988 pledge. “No new taxes,” McCain responded. Two weeks later, McCain said, “I’m not making a ‘read my lips’ statement, in that I will not raise taxes.”

* McCain’s campaign unveiled a Social Security policy that the senator would implement if elected, which did not include a Bush-like privatization scheme. In March 2008, McCain denounced his own campaign’s policy.

* In February 2008, McCain abandoned his opposition to waterboarding.

* In November 2007, McCain reversed his previous position on a long-term presence for U.S. troops in Iraq, arguing that the “nature of the society in Iraq” and the “religious aspects” of the country make it inevitable that the United States “eventually withdraws.” Two months later, McCain reversed back, saying he’s prepared to leave U.S. troops in Iraq for 100 years.

* McCain used to champion the Law of the Sea convention, even volunteering to testify on the treaty’s behalf before a Senate committee. Now he opposes it.

* McCain was a co-sponsor of the DREAM Act, which would grant legal status to illegal immigrants’ kids who graduate from high school. Now he’s against it.

* On immigration policy in general, McCain announced in February 2008 that he would vote against his own legislation.

* In 2006, McCain sponsored legislation to require grassroots lobbying coalitions to reveal their financial donors. In 2007, after receiving “feedback” on the proposal, McCain told far-right activist groups that he opposes his own measure.

* McCain said before the war in Iraq, “We will win this conflict. We will win it easily.” Four years later, McCain said he knew all along that the war in Iraq war was “probably going to be long and hard and tough.”

* McCain said he was the “greatest critic” of Rumsfeld’s failed Iraq policy. In December 2003, McCain praised the same strategy as “a mission accomplished.” In March 2004, he said, “I’m confident we’re on the right course.” In December 2005, he said, “Overall, I think a year from now, we will have made a fair amount of progress if we stay the course.”

* McCain went from saying he would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade to saying the exact opposite.

* McCain went from saying gay marriage should be allowed, to saying gay marriage shouldn’t be allowed.

* McCain criticized TV preacher Jerry Falwell as “an agent of intolerance” in 2002, but then decided to cozy up to the man who said Americans “deserved” the 9/11 attacks.

* McCain used to oppose Bush’s tax cuts for the very wealthy, but he reversed course in February.

* On a related note, he said 2005 that he opposed the tax cuts because they were “too tilted to the wealthy.” By 2007, he denied ever having said this, and insisted he opposed the cuts because of increased government spending.

* In 2000, McCain accused Texas businessmen Sam and Charles Wyly of being corrupt, spending “dirty money” to help finance Bush’s presidential campaign. McCain not only filed a complaint against the Wylys for allegedly violating campaign finance law, he also lashed out at them publicly. In April, McCain reached out to the Wylys for support.

* McCain supported a major campaign-finance reform measure that bore his name. In June 2007, he abandoned his own legislation.

* McCain opposed a holiday to honor Martin Luther King, Jr., before he supported it.

* McCain was against presidential candidates campaigning at Bob Jones University before he was for it.

* McCain was anti-ethanol. Now he’s pro-ethanol.

* McCain was both for and against state promotion of the Confederate flag.

* McCain decided in 2000 that he didn’t want anything to do with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, believing he “would taint the image of the ‘Straight Talk Express.'” Kissinger is now the Honorary Co-Chair for his presidential campaign in New York.

Now, it’s worth noting that there are worse qualities in a presidential candidate than changing one’s mind about a policy matter or two. McCain has been in Congress for decades; he’s bound to shift now and then on various controversies.

But therein lies the point — McCain was consistent on most of these issues, right up until he started running for president, at which point he conveniently abandoned practically every position he used to hold. The problem isn’t just the incessant flip-flops; it’s the shameless pandering and hollow convictions behind the incessant flip-flops.

Update: This post has been updated and expanded.

 
Discussion

What do you think? Leave a comment. Alternatively, write a post on your own weblog; this blog accepts trackbacks.

23 Comments
1.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 1:09 pm, Mark D said:

And if we’re playing by Republican rules, McCain’s “inconsistencies” should be a fairly serious problem.

Now, now, CB … we all know “Republican rules” apply to everyone but themselves.

2.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 1:11 pm, Dale said:

Do they really want to use the term “evolve”?

3.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 1:12 pm, Dale said:

Mark D in #1 is right. Republicans only have rules for Democrats.

4.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 1:13 pm, Danp said:

Two months later, McCain reversed back, saying he’s prepared to leave U.S. troops in Iraq for 100 years.

Oh, that was so twenty minutes ago. Now he’s saying the war will soon be over.

5.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 1:17 pm, dalloway said:

And the MSM, of course, will conveniently (for Republicans) ignore it all. Why? Because the media conglomerates know they won’t be guaranteed the same kind of “hands-off, just pony up your millions in campaign donations and do whatever the hell you want” treatment from a Democratic administration. The media isn’t biased in McCain’s favor because they love the old war horse — they have a huge vested interest in keeping Democrats, especially ones they can’t buy, out of office. And of course, good luck getting anyone except bloggers to report that!

6.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 1:19 pm, Ohioan said:

Watch video of Howard Dean go for the jugular, pointing out McCain’s problem with integrity.

Howard Dean – Best. DNC chairman. Ever.

7.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 1:21 pm, Danp said:

dalloway (5) No kidding! Just this morning Joe Scarborough and Joe Klein were commenting on how the Catholics are a natural fit for McCain. You might think this was in the context of the recent Hagee endorsement, but you would be wrong.

8.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 1:23 pm, beep52 said:

“…McCain was consistent on most of these issues, right up until he started running for president…”

McCain’s an old man facing his last chance at the brass ring, and he’ll do anything to get it. As I’ve said before and I’m sure will again, anyone who wants needs the presidency this badly should be automatically disqualified.

9.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 1:37 pm, IludiumPhosdex said:

Could these “inconsistencies,” perhaps, include observing from the sidelines, as it were, the rather biased Russian Presidential elections for new and innovative methods and techniques in manipulation and perversion of the electoral process to corrupt and dangerous advantage?

10.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 1:54 pm, TR said:

Howard Dean – Best. DNC chairman. Ever.

Absolutely. He’s done phenomenal work building the party and, at the same time, is one of the best communicators for the party.

11.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 2:11 pm, Greg said:

Last I checked flip flopping and inconsistency were the issue with Multiple Choice Mitt. It’s no open secret that McCain’s always been “flexible,” but it’s nice to see the fawning media start to notice as well.

12.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 2:45 pm, petorado said:

The McCain camp had better keep old John in bubble all campaign long, for if he speaks to a group with more left-leaning views than his own his chameleon-like personality will cause the damnedest things to come out of his mouth. Please, please, please have John address the ACLU. It will be high comedy to hear him pander to that crowd.

13.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 3:05 pm, ScottW said:

This isn’t really a change of position, but he is against corporate influence and the appearance of impropriety, but not for himself. He’s the straight talker, impervious to corporate influence, even if he rides their jets, calls them friends, and writes letters to government agencies on their behalf.

It’s comical how transparent his positions have become. You want to know where the Maverick stands, look and see where Bush stands, they are one in the same.

14.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 3:19 pm, SmilingDixie said:

THE RULES:

1) Unless you have proof (to level of a conviction in a court) of illegal or immoral or inconsistent behavior by a repuke, it is not fair to say or print so. It is fair to point out anything that a dumbocrat is suspected of having done with a level of proof required being that Drudge has printed it.

2) It ain’t illegal if a rethugnican does it. It is illegal if a dumbocrat does it & even sometimes when he doesn’t (see Sieglemann).

3) It ain’t immoral if a repugnican does it. Unless it a gay activity & then we have ‘faux noise’ display a graphic identifying the person as a democrat.

4) Repukes do NOT flip flop – they have evolutions of opinions. Dumbs do flip flop – even if they have consistency in their votes.

15.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 6:50 pm, Michael said:

St. John reminds me of no one as much as Hubert Humphrey who, in Hunter Thompson’s words, would have blown a dead rat to be president.
But, no matter, the man has reporters over for barbecue, so they’ll continue to give him a free pass.
Does no one in the MSM have any sense of journalistic ethics?

16.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 8:02 pm, harry said:

McCain was actually pro ethanol before he was against it, then was againdt it and now he’s for it again. So that’s a flip flop flip.

17.
On March 3rd, 2008 at 9:36 pm, Fred said:

Great list. Would like to see more references and links in some of the noted examples just to emphasize his old and new positions.

18.
On March 4th, 2008 at 12:19 pm, Philadelphia Steve said:

So what if John McCain does flip-flop faster than a seal on ice.

Republicans never hold themselves accountable to the standards they set for others.

And the media is so in love with Senator McCain that none of them will ever be so rude as to mentione it about him.

So John has nothing to worry aobut and can flip to his heart’s content.

19.
On March 31st, 2008 at 1:09 pm, AdamB said:

in response to Dale and Mark D:

it’s not just republican rules that work this way. in fact you could apply that principle to just about any two entities in politics. the US in general treats any other state in that way; the US’ international policy on ‘not tolerating peer competitors’ exemplifies it quite clearly. also, the nuclear issue is the same thing.

i think that type of hypocrisy is embedded far deeper in the inner workings of the political arena than anyone likes to admit; but to point the finger at the republicans on this matter, i think, is foolish.

20.
On April 1st, 2008 at 1:47 pm, Joanna said:

Kerry’s so call flip flop could never hold a candle to John McCain’s constant flip flopping. First he was against tax cuts not sure if he knew or remembered the whole detail then he’s for it PERMANENTLY which by the way is for the group of people do not need it nor ever asked for it which are the rich. Then he gets his facts wrong about who or what country is training terrorists. That piece of news of can be found just about any website minus Fraud News (Fox) since they made him out to have corrected his self. When Lieberman had to whisper in his ear with the correction. Thought that was over? Nope he spews the same mistake exactly the way he had it before Lieberman whispered sweet nothings of correction in his ears. That time Lieberman didn’t rescue him and he stand or at lest stood behind what he said. Could anyone imagine having a president going globally making important news without having his sweet prince of corrections Joe Lieberman to help with the corrections. Without his sweet whispering prince of corrections, McCain would send out lives to go out and kill and be killed by the people who had nothing to do with training of terrorists. Can’t forget innocent mothers, fathers, kids, of both genders and different walks of life would be injured and killed due to a president’s own information that was in fact misinformed.

21.
On April 9th, 2008 at 1:24 am, dean said:

This is not a high school election, this is not about, “He’s a nice man, I’ll vote for him”. Reagan did that, and it was a disaster for this country. If you vote for McCain, you’re voting for continued republican rule, and all that it has brought us these past eight years. The victors write the history. Do we really want to have a discussion in twenty years about whether or not to put GW Bush on Mt. Rushmore?

22.
On April 9th, 2008 at 5:31 am, Skip said:

John McCain has sold his soul to the devil. It frightens me that he has “evolved” into a total moronic Bushbot. If America still believes these two liars, we deserve to become a true third world country. God save America from McCain and George Bush and Dick Cheney—- anti-Christs one and all

Mentions on other sites...
  1. Modulator on March 3rd, 2008 at 5:37 pm