June 2, 2008

McCain continues to shift with the wind

Update: This post has been updated, expanded, and broken down by category.

It’s been about a month since we last explored John McCain’s many, many policy reversals (a.k.a., flip-flops), but thankfully, the Republican candidate running as a principled, consistent conservative, who refuses to pander or shift with the wind, continues to give us plenty of new material to work with.

Over the last month, we’ve learned, for example, that McCain seems to have switched on whether to extend retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies…

A top lawyer for Sen. John McCain’s presidential campaign said telecommunications companies should be forced to explain their role in the Bush administration’s warrantless surveillance program as a condition for legal immunity for past wiretapping, a statement that stands in marked contrast to positions taken by President Bush, McCain and other Republicans in Congress.

“There would need to be hearings, real hearings, to find out what actually happened, what harms actually occurred, rather than some sort of sweeping of things under the rug,” Chuck Fish, a former vice president and chief patent counsel at Time Warner, said last week at the Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference in New Haven, Conn., according to an audiotape available on the conference Web site. “That would be absolutely verboten in a McCain administration.”

…and storing spent nuclear fuel at Yucca Mountain in Nevada…

As John McCain, alighting in Reno today, tries to woo Nevada voters, he is hoping for the kind of short-term memory loss Christopher Nolan wrote about and filmed in “Memento.” If Nevadans keep forgetting what he has said and done before, McCain might actually be able to convince voters here that his love for the state has simply been well-hidden. Very well-hidden.

Voters everywhere are used to being treated like ingenuous dumbbells by politicians trolling for their votes. But not since George W. Bush declined all interviews on the subject and uttered his “sound science” mantra has a White House hopeful so obviously taken the state for a bunch of rubes.

…and whether the U.S. should move “towards normalization of relations” with Cuba… and whether the U.S. should engage in diplomacy with Hamas … and whether the U.S. should engage in diplomacy with Syria … and whether the NRA should have a role in the Republican Party’s policy making … and his support for his own lobbying-reform legislation from 1997 … and whether he wants political support from radical televangelists like John Hagee and Rod Parsley … and his support for the Lieberman/Warner legislation to combat global warming.

And these are just from the last few weeks.

Maybe we could get all the various John McCains together in a room, let them debate one another on the various issues on which they’re diametrically opposed, and the Republicans can get back to us once they’ve figured out a policy platform.

Maybe now would be a good time for my updated-once-a-month list of McCain flip-flops?

Confronted with the inconsistencies in McCain’s record in March, the senator’s aides told the New York Times that the senator “has evolved rather than switched positions in his 25-year career.” That’s a perfectly sensible spin — when a politician holds one position, and then, for apparently political reasons, decides to embrace the polar opposite position, it’s only natural for his or her aides to say the politician’s position has “evolved.”

But in McCain’s case, the spin is wholly unfulfilling. First, McCain sells himself as a pol who never sways with the wind, and whose willingness to be consistent in the face of pressure is proof of his character. Second, Republicans have spent the last four years or so making policy reversals the single most serious political crime in presidential politics. The dreaded “flip-flop” is, according to the GOP, the latest cardinal sin for someone seeking national office.

And if we’re playing by Republican rules, McCain’s “evolutions” should be a fairly serious problem.

Here’s the updated and expanded list:

* McCain pledged in February 2008 that he would not, under any circumstances, raise taxes. Specifically, McCain was asked if he is a “‘read my lips’ candidate, no new taxes, no matter what?” referring to George H.W. Bush’s 1988 pledge. “No new taxes,” McCain responded. Two weeks later, McCain said, “I’m not making a ‘read my lips’ statement, in that I will not raise taxes.”

* McCain is both for and against a “rogue state rollback” as a focus of his foreign policy vision.

* McCain considered and did not consider joining John Kerry’s Democratic ticket in 2004.

* In 1998, he championed raising cigarette taxes to fund programs to cut underage smoking, insisting that it would prevent illnesses and provide resources for public health programs. Now, McCain opposes a $0.61-per-pack tax increase, won’t commit to supporting a regulation bill he’s co-sponsoring, and has hired Philip Morris’ former lobbyist as his senior campaign adviser.

* McCain has changed his economic worldview on multiple occasions.

* McCain has changed his mind about a long-term U.S. military presence in Iraq on multiple occasions.

* McCain is both for and against attacking Barack Obama over his former pastor at his former church.

* McCain believes Americans are both better and worse off than they were before Bush took office.

* McCain is both for and against earmarks for Arizona.

* McCain believes his endorsement from radical televangelist John Hagee was both a good and bad idea.

* McCain’s first mortgage plan was premised on the notion that homeowners facing foreclosure shouldn’t be “rewarded” for acting “irresponsibly.” His second mortgage plan took largely the opposite position.

* McCain vowed, if elected, to balance the federal budget by the end of his first term. Soon after, he decided he would no longer even try to reach that goal.

* McCain’s campaign unveiled a Social Security policy that the senator would implement if elected, which did not include a Bush-like privatization scheme. In March 2008, McCain denounced his own campaign’s policy.

* In February 2008, McCain reversed course on prohibiting waterboarding.

* McCain used to champion the Law of the Sea convention, even volunteering to testify on the treaty’s behalf before a Senate committee. Now he opposes it.

* McCain was a co-sponsor of the DREAM Act, which would grant legal status to illegal immigrants’ kids who graduate from high school. Now he’s against it.

* On immigration policy in general, McCain announced in February 2008 that he would vote against his own legislation.

* In 2006, McCain sponsored legislation to require grassroots lobbying coalitions to reveal their financial donors. In 2007, after receiving “feedback” on the proposal, McCain told far-right activist groups that he opposes his own measure.

* McCain said before the war in Iraq, “We will win this conflict. We will win it easily.” Four years later, McCain said he knew all along that the war in Iraq war was “probably going to be long and hard and tough.”

* McCain said he was the “greatest critic” of Rumsfeld’s failed Iraq policy. In December 2003, McCain praised the same strategy as “a mission accomplished.” In March 2004, he said, “I’m confident we’re on the right course.” In December 2005, he said, “Overall, I think a year from now, we will have made a fair amount of progress if we stay the course.”

* McCain went from saying he would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade to saying the exact opposite.

* McCain went from saying gay marriage should be allowed, to saying gay marriage shouldn’t be allowed.

* McCain criticized TV preacher Jerry Falwell as “an agent of intolerance” in 2002, but then decided to cozy up to the man who said Americans “deserved” the 9/11 attacks.

* McCain used to oppose Bush’s tax cuts for the very wealthy, but he reversed course in February.

* On a related note, he said 2005 that he opposed the tax cuts because they were “too tilted to the wealthy.” By 2007, he denied ever having said this, and insisted he opposed the cuts because of increased government spending.

* In 2000, McCain accused Texas businessmen Sam and Charles Wyly of being corrupt, spending “dirty money” to help finance Bush’s presidential campaign. McCain not only filed a complaint against the Wylys for allegedly violating campaign finance law, he also lashed out at them publicly. In April, McCain reached out to the Wylys for support.

* McCain supported a major campaign-finance reform measure that bore his name. In June 2007, he abandoned his own legislation.

* McCain opposed a holiday to honor Martin Luther King, Jr., before he supported it.

* McCain was against presidential candidates campaigning at Bob Jones University before he was for it.

* McCain was anti-ethanol. Now he’s pro-ethanol.

* McCain was both for and against state promotion of the Confederate flag.

* McCain decided in 2000 that he didn’t want anything to do with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, believing he “would taint the image of the ‘Straight Talk Express.'” Kissinger is now the Honorary Co-Chair for his presidential campaign in New York.

Now, it’s worth noting that there are worse qualities in a presidential candidate than changing one’s mind about a policy matter or two. McCain has been in Congress for decades; he’s bound to shift now and then on various controversies.

But therein lies the point — McCain was consistent on most of these issues, right up until he started running for president, at which point he conveniently abandoned practically every position he used to hold. The problem isn’t just the incessant flip-flops; it’s the shameless pandering and hollow convictions behind the incessant flip-flops.

As Josh Marshall recently noted, “McCain is absolutely gung-ho and certain that he’s right about whatever his position and ‘principles’ are at the given moment. But they change repeatedly.”

 
Discussion

What do you think? Leave a comment. Alternatively, write a post on your own weblog; this blog accepts trackbacks.

12 Comments
1.
On June 2nd, 2008 at 9:21 am, N.Wells said:

I am so looking forward to the Obama – McCain – McCain debates in the fall.

2.
On June 2nd, 2008 at 9:28 am, kevo said:

Stay vigilant, after all, inconsistency can be a rollicoaster ride, and many Americans, (read unengaged voter), do like their excitement!

Don’t count McCain out merely because we can see his opportunism. Other Americans see him in a positive light because of it. -Kevo

3.
On June 2nd, 2008 at 9:44 am, Tomb said:

I think McCain and Bush are alike in this fundamental way – they both believe that their opinions and ideas are naturally superior (arrogance of ego). This is a condition that often afflicts one in a privileged or powerful position. A good example is when McCain was offended by Obama’s audacity to question him about his position on veteran’s benefits. Bush reflexively opposed anything President Clinton did assuming it was wrong because Clinton did it. In both cases, neither considered the merits of the ideas. As we have seen, this is a character trait to be very wary of when considering presidential candidates.

4.
On June 2nd, 2008 at 9:48 am, OkieFromMuskogee said:

“Those are my principles, and if you don’t like them… well, I have others.” – Groucho Marx

5.
On June 2nd, 2008 at 10:03 am, KevinMc said:

John McCentury’s most cherished vision for America is when he looks in the mirror and sees the President of the United States.

6.
On June 2nd, 2008 at 10:15 am, Grumpy said:

“…John McCain… is hoping for the kind of short-term memory loss Christopher Nolan wrote about and filmed in Memento.”

Don’t believe his lies.

7.
On June 2nd, 2008 at 10:15 am, Steve said:

I can’t keep up with this Smeagol-Gollum stuff of his any more. From now on, I’m referring to him as “McMaybe.” Maybe yes, maybe no, maybe both and neither at the same time.

And yes—you may feel free to add the “rry” to the end on “McMaybe….”

8.
On June 2nd, 2008 at 11:39 am, The Answer is Orange said:

the senator “has evolved rather than switched positions in his 25-year career.”

They’ll retract that statment as soon as the TheoCons start to swoon because a McCaniac used the “E” word.

9.
On June 2nd, 2008 at 12:29 pm, Stan said:

What we’ve seen of McCain for the last seven years are the media’s favorite McCain trailers and promo shorts. Now we’re seeing the full movie, screened nightly. Not an unedited, uncut version, of course; that will never happen. But we are seeing how a blockbuster movie is made. For instance, a movie script isn’t a finished, written on stone tablets, work of art when shooting begins; it evolves as writers and director discover the storyline may not make sense anymore, is unbelievable, our will never play to the intended audience. Numerous script changes (flip flops?) are always required. In the McCain saga, this leads to daily rewrites.

So, keep tuned. McCain’s character will evolve until the uninitiated or uninterested voter and the media see no difference between Obama and McCain on major issues.

As I see it, Obama has two ways to win the GE. McCain makes such a fool of himself that his unfitness for the oval office is apparent to everyone. And the media finally throws him under the bus. I’m not sure Obama can do much to help his own cause.

10.
On June 2nd, 2008 at 1:33 pm, Rob Bachorik said:

Just what we need in 2009, a president with Alzheimers and the IQ a rock.

11.
On June 4th, 2008 at 4:35 pm, Steve Roth said:

Great job pulling all this together.

You should rework this as a two-column table, with columns headed “Then” and “Now.”

Or lemme know and I’ll do it…

Mentions on other sites...
  1. pligg.com on June 2nd, 2008 at 4:48 pm