I’m feeling guilty over the Templars’ Innocence
Seems like every other day, or at least every other week, there is some new article in the media announcing the Templars’ innocence based on the Chinon Parchment.
Generally, and I’m sure hardly coincidently, it is usually tied in to the release of some new book on the Templars.
Problem is – the information really isn’t anything new – at least not to the likes of say Malcolm Barber or Helen Nicholson, who have written great works on the Templar trials.
While the Chinon Parchment may have been misfiled since the seventeenth century, historians have long known the general information it contains, particularly when you consider that the papal bull that dissolved the order - Vox in Excelso – pretty much dismisses the idea that they were heretics.
Rather, Clement and his council felt the Templars’ reputation was too sullied for them to continue.
With all this new-fangled interest in their innocence, I wouldn’t be surprised if some modern-day Templar Order tried to sue the Vatican …. Oh, you say that’s already happened?
Last year, a British Templar Order demanded that Pope Benedict apologize for the Church’s actions against the Templars, and now we have an outfit in Spain trying to sue for the restoration of their good name.
We all get it - the Templars were innocent. But if these little groups claiming to be the real deal keep popping out of the woodwork, the Templars may get a new reputation, and one that requires the wearing of white mantles with sleeves that tie in the back.




