RSS Home Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!

Unhappy Birthday, As Spam Turns 30


It all started with a marketing guy

Unfortunately, we mean the email based pest when discussing spam, which began when a marketer blasted nearly 400 people on Arpanet with the first junk email.

Our preferred choice of observing this anniversary of spam would be with a sledgehammer, an egregious spammer, and no witnesses. Failing that, we have to fall back on reporting it with the hopes of a better time coming someday.

New Scientist reminded everyone that on May 3rd, 1978, Gary Thuerk dumped a spam on 393 Arpanet recipients. He wasn't hiding behind a forged address, a botnet, or fast-flux DNS; complaints hits his employer, DEC, over his actions.

Keep in mind this took place at a time when storage was expensive and precious, broadband connectivity equated to 56kbps, and few outside the defense and academic communities even had email accounts. A spammer's Internet reach basically extended to a handful of facilities in California and a few other states.

Low costs and lucrative return potential motivates spammers today, as does the potential to wreak havoc through stealing company and government secrets via malware delivered by a spam attack. The report noted up to 90 percent of the world's email at a given time is of a spammy nature.

How times have changed. We hope they will continue to change, though a dream of universal spammer punishment seems unlikely. Any technological advances and motivated efforts that can push the spam fight off people's desktops, and out to the borders of the networks, benefits everyone. We want to see more of this.

Digg This! StumbleUpon This!
AddThis Social Bookmark Widget

News Tags: Technology, DEC, Gary Thuerk, Spam

Comments

NO MORE SPAM

Happy birthday!!!

 

http://www.unleashedstangs.com

 

Declare an international war on spamers

 

 

 

Declare an international war on spamers - now that would be a great 30th Birthday present!!!


Its time governments took spam seriously and  re-classify it as an activity similar to terrorism and invoke similar tough stances and penalties – at the end of the day its an activity that causes commercial loss, frustration, its a conduit  for  cyber acts (real terrorist activities) and can cost lives by denial of service (suspect it already has)

 

Happy Birthday to Spamm

I'm just curious, what was the spam trying to sell? Pocket protectors?

Happy Birthday to Spamm

Am ok with Spam as long as it is safe spam...lol. I mean no virus, no pirated stuff & just a marketing campaign ...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.