Related Stories
Google Getting Aggressive with Advertising
Behavioral Targeting Hits Road Block
Google Patent App. Pursues Behavioral Targeting
Behavioral Targeting: Why This Hot Technology is Burning its Users
Behavioral Targeting Moves by Yahoo & Google
A Grim Future for Small Behavioral Targeting Networks
US Senate's Response To Online Privacy Laws For Advertising
It's a Targeted Targeted World
Amazon & Toys"R" Us Involved in Behavioral Targeting?
Behavioral Targeting (BT) at eMetrics
RSS
Home
Newsletter
Advertising










Comments
Controversy and the Opt In Factor
So how do web sites, including this one (which is unencrypted) opt in?
Ecommerce sites, sites with Copyright content?
If you own or operate a web site, there's no consideration for your communications privacy, security or data integrity.
ISP customers don't own the content they view, they have a licence to view it. Phorm don't make an identifiable request for the content they copy, it is stolen 'on the fly'.
Phorm doesn't obtain consent to intercept, or a Copyright licence, in advance.
So its utterly illegal.
Given the complete failure of UK regulators to act to protect unencrypted data comms in the UK, the only options that remain to comprehensively protect your web site and business from industrial espionage is strong encryption and/or blocking BT customers.
Freedom Incinerator
I think the diagram says it all. There is no technical detail at all about what data is stored/processed. Importantly what independent body polices the channel queries.
Channel: John Doe Subversive
John Doe, John Doe Islington, John Doe Acacia Avenue, Trades Union
Channel: Privacy Freak
fipr.org, worldprivacyforum.com, openrights.org
etc. etc.
Matched channel give him a flash cookie, first party cookie, third party cookie, userdata etc. and if subversive why not send an alert to the management console in realtime.
Bye Bye Freedom.
Post new comment