Esperanza leaves Southern Ocean but whaling campaign continues

Posted by jamie — 29 January 2008 at 2:41pm - Comments

A Greenpeace inflatable prevents the Nisshin Maru refuelling from the Oriental Bluebird

A Greenpeace inflatable prevents the Nisshin Maru from being refuelled by the Oriental Bluebird © Greenpeace/Jiri Rezac

A few days ago, the Esperanza - which had been pursuing the Japanese whaling fleet for two weeks - was forced to quit the chase and head back to port as the ship is running low on fuel. But this year's Southern Ocean expedition has been a resounding success.

To start with, based on the quotas set for the whaling fleet, we estimate that over 100 whales have been saved from the harpoon this year. The Japanese government announced that no whaling would take place while the fleet was being watched so the presence of the Esperanza has prevented them from hunting. We'd like nothing more than to keep going until the end of the whaling season but, unlike the whaling fleet, we're not able to refuel in the middle of the ocean. Iréne aboard the Esperanza has written an illuminating piece about the refuelling issue and why, for us, it isn't an option.

Iréne also points out that the campaign to end whaling won't be won in the Southern Ocean, but on the streets of Japan. This year, we've seen a big shift and an issue that hasn't previously been talked about is making its way into the mainstream press. Various articles and letters have been published questioning Japan's involvement in whaling, and last week the prime minister was obliged to talk about the issue in parliament.

To demonstrate how the subject just hasn't been discussed in Japan up until now, in 2006 a survey was conducted by the Nippon Research Centre which found that 90 per cent of the Japanese public didn't realise their government hunted whales in the Southern Ocean sanctuary. When they found out, 69 per cent disagreed with it, so public opinion is behind us; the problem is getting whaling onto the political agenda.

And even though the Esperanza is leaving the whaling grounds, the campaign continues. Canon is a Japanese company which makes a great deal of how its photographic equipment is used to capture amazing wildlife images, and is also a major sponsor of conservation and environmental projects. We want the company to say that it opposes the lethal research that the Japanese government conducts - so far they've resisted but you can tell Canon's CEO why he should take a stand.

We chose not to speak to Sea Shepherd because, for Greenpeace non-violence is non-negotiable. My colleague Karli in the Southern Ocean summed it up in her blog:

http://weblog.greenpeace.org/whales/
2008/01/if_nonviolent_direct_action_is.html#more

But the truth is, that diverting attention to differences between our organisations takes the focus away from pressuring the Government of Japan to stop whaling.

No one is questioning any other organization's commitment, but we can’t give out the co-ordinates whilst Sea Shepherd refuses to rule out violence. Ultimately we would be blamed for any subsequent violence in Japan, which would undermine all of the amazing support our campaign is getting there :

http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/fake-
science-exposed180108/Whaling-receives-criticism200108

And Japan is where this campaign will ultimately be won, not in the Southern Ocean. Which is why we took a strategic decision to focus our limited resources there for the good of the campaign, and not to refuel Esperanza and set off after the whalers again.

Thanks for your thoughtful comments, Phil. It is an agonising call to have to make - of course Greenpeace's aim is to save as many whales as possible, but it's also to win the war on whaling - not just one battle. And to repeat the main point from my last post, this war will be won in Japan and not in the Southern Ocean.

Our campaigners made a strategic decision that although Sea Shepherd's motives are undoubtedly sound, in practice their methods will alienate the Japanese public (a majority of whom currently oppose whaling) and prove counter productive - in which case whaling could continue for decades and thousands more whales will die. We feel that the mood in Japan is already changing, as evidenced by the fleet's refusal to whale while Esperanza was in the vicinity - they like to do their dirty work in secret and hate questions being asked at home about the hows and whys of their operation.

There were two main of reasons why the decision not to give the fleet's co-ordinates to Sea Shepherd was taken:

1) public opinion in Japan is the strongest lever we have and is starting to produce results, and we weren't about to let that genuine progress be jeopardised - by sharing co-ordinates we would ultimately have been held responsible in Japan for whatever action Sea Shepherd took.

2) in practice sharing the co-ordinates would have been pointless as the Nisshin Maru was on the move, and Sea Shepherd had to disengage pretty soon after us because of lack of fuel too. The only people who can help SS with co-ordinates are the Oceanic Viking, as they are still with them … so maybe that’s where SS supporters should direct their energy.

It's not about violence to property, Fiona, it's about violence to people. As you'll know the Souther Ocean is one of the most inhospitable environments in the world, and certainly not the place to risk lives. When one ship rams another no one can be certain what the outcome will be or who may be injured. There is also a law of the sea that you don't set out to endanger another vessel, or fail to aid another ship in distress. This time last year the Esperanza came to the aid of the Nisshin Maru after the whaling ship suffered an engine-room fire in which one crew member died.

Greenpeace will never knowingly put lives at risk to make a point. It's one of our core beliefs, and equally to the point, it's counter-productive to successful campaigning.

"I guess i just don't go along with the common notion that a human life is worth more than any other species life.."

That's not actually what I was saying, Fiona, and not what I believe. My point was that we all want Japan to stop whaling as soon as possible - achieving that would be the biggest single thing any of us could do to protect the maximum number of whales. And the best chance of achieving this would be to make whaling politically unacceptable in Japan - Greenpeace has been working hard in Japan over the past few years to make this happen - and the fact that whaling is now being debated and discussed in Japan shows we are making progress.

Of course no one at Greenpeace wants a single whale to die at the hands of a whaler. But the reality is that the whaling fleet will continue to conduct its annual slaughter in the Southern Ocean until Japanese public opinion demands otherwise - so that has to be the main focus of our campaign.

We chose not to speak to Sea Shepherd because, for Greenpeace non-violence is non-negotiable. My colleague Karli in the Southern Ocean summed it up in her blog: http://weblog.greenpeace.org/whales/ 2008/01/if_nonviolent_direct_action_is.html#more But the truth is, that diverting attention to differences between our organisations takes the focus away from pressuring the Government of Japan to stop whaling. No one is questioning any other organization's commitment, but we can’t give out the co-ordinates whilst Sea Shepherd refuses to rule out violence. Ultimately we would be blamed for any subsequent violence in Japan, which would undermine all of the amazing support our campaign is getting there : http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/fake- science-exposed180108/Whaling-receives-criticism200108 And Japan is where this campaign will ultimately be won, not in the Southern Ocean. Which is why we took a strategic decision to focus our limited resources there for the good of the campaign, and not to refuel Esperanza and set off after the whalers again.

Thanks for your thoughtful comments, Phil. It is an agonising call to have to make - of course Greenpeace's aim is to save as many whales as possible, but it's also to win the war on whaling - not just one battle. And to repeat the main point from my last post, this war will be won in Japan and not in the Southern Ocean. Our campaigners made a strategic decision that although Sea Shepherd's motives are undoubtedly sound, in practice their methods will alienate the Japanese public (a majority of whom currently oppose whaling) and prove counter productive - in which case whaling could continue for decades and thousands more whales will die. We feel that the mood in Japan is already changing, as evidenced by the fleet's refusal to whale while Esperanza was in the vicinity - they like to do their dirty work in secret and hate questions being asked at home about the hows and whys of their operation. There were two main of reasons why the decision not to give the fleet's co-ordinates to Sea Shepherd was taken: 1) public opinion in Japan is the strongest lever we have and is starting to produce results, and we weren't about to let that genuine progress be jeopardised - by sharing co-ordinates we would ultimately have been held responsible in Japan for whatever action Sea Shepherd took. 2) in practice sharing the co-ordinates would have been pointless as the Nisshin Maru was on the move, and Sea Shepherd had to disengage pretty soon after us because of lack of fuel too. The only people who can help SS with co-ordinates are the Oceanic Viking, as they are still with them … so maybe that’s where SS supporters should direct their energy.

It's not about violence to property, Fiona, it's about violence to people. As you'll know the Souther Ocean is one of the most inhospitable environments in the world, and certainly not the place to risk lives. When one ship rams another no one can be certain what the outcome will be or who may be injured. There is also a law of the sea that you don't set out to endanger another vessel, or fail to aid another ship in distress. This time last year the Esperanza came to the aid of the Nisshin Maru after the whaling ship suffered an engine-room fire in which one crew member died. Greenpeace will never knowingly put lives at risk to make a point. It's one of our core beliefs, and equally to the point, it's counter-productive to successful campaigning.

"I guess i just don't go along with the common notion that a human life is worth more than any other species life.." That's not actually what I was saying, Fiona, and not what I believe. My point was that we all want Japan to stop whaling as soon as possible - achieving that would be the biggest single thing any of us could do to protect the maximum number of whales. And the best chance of achieving this would be to make whaling politically unacceptable in Japan - Greenpeace has been working hard in Japan over the past few years to make this happen - and the fact that whaling is now being debated and discussed in Japan shows we are making progress. Of course no one at Greenpeace wants a single whale to die at the hands of a whaler. But the reality is that the whaling fleet will continue to conduct its annual slaughter in the Southern Ocean until Japanese public opinion demands otherwise - so that has to be the main focus of our campaign.

About Jamie

I'm a forests campaigner working mainly on Indonesia. My personal mumblings can be found @shrinkydinky.

Follow Greenpeace UK