Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

The media is (almost) onto McCain's cynical doubletalk

'Purpose,' McCain's new energy ad, features wind turbines he voted against

Posted by Joseph Romm (Guest Contributor) at 8:44 PM on 02 Jul 2008

McCain has a new ad titled "Purpose":

The AP critiqued it with a piece titled, "McCain energy ad short on specifics." Okay, mainstream media, half credit.

The ad has a much bigger problem than lack of specifics -- McCain is trying to get a political boost by claiming he will champion popular clean energy technologies that he, like President Bush and most conservatives, has consistently opposed:

SCRIPT: Announcer: American technology protected the world. We went to the moon, not because it was easy, but because it was hard. John McCain will call America to our next national purpose: energy security.

A comprehensive bipartisan plan to lower prices at the pump, reduce dependence on foreign oil through domestic drilling, and champion energy alternatives for better choices and lower costs. Putting country first.

McCain: I'm John McCain and I approved this message.

You cannot be serious. The only energy "alternative" McCain seriously champions is nuclear power, which (unlike, say, polyester) is two years older then he is (the first experimental nuclear fission was in 1934). As for the other alternatives the ad depicts, solar and wind -- McCain has been one of their leading opponents in Congress of government efforts to promote.

This ad is as phony as his photo-op earlier this year. To repeat the key point documented by the Center for American Progress, McCain has repeatedly opposed a renewable electricity standard that would have set a minimum requirement for utilities to generate part of their power from sources like wind.

Half the states have such requirements, a key reason the industry has not died out entirely in this country. Most European countries have such requirements, a key reason their countries had become leaders. Where was McCain:

In 2002 and 2005, there were votes in the Senate to require utilities nationwide to generate 10 percent or 20 percent of their electricity from renewable energy resources. Sen. McCain voted against renewable electricity every time.
  • 2005: Voted against a renewable portfolio standard
  • 2002: Voted against 20 percent requirement:
  • 2002 (Vote 55): Voted to gut 10 percent requirement:
  • 2002 (Vote 59): voted to gut 10 percent requirement:

McCain opposed subsides for wind power, as he told Grist in October:

Grist: What's your position on subsidies for green technologies like wind and solar?

McCain: I'm not one who believes that we need to subsidize things. The wind industry is doing fine, the solar industry is doing fine. In the '70s, we gave too many subsidies and too much help, and we had substandard products sold to the American people, which then made them disenchanted with solar for a long time.

A classic energy doubletalker, like President Bush, McCain appeals to conservatives by opposing government-led programs to promote clean energy, while trying to appeal to independents by wrapping himself in solar panels.

The AP story does make one good point:

The ad calls for more domestic drilling, but avoids controversy over where to drill by keeping the issue vague. McCain has proposed opening coastal waters that have been off limits for decades to drilling, and has called for building 100 new nuclear power reactors. Both issues are controversial and are not addressed directly in the ad. Government energy analysts have said opening offshore waters that now are under drilling moratoria would not likely have a significant impact on oil supplies or prices before 2030.

Again, McCain is hoping the media and voters won't notice his doubletalk, calculated ambiguity, and contradictory energy policies so he can simultaneously woo both conservatives and independents.

This super-cynical ploy can only work if both the media and the public are, like my 16-month-old daughter, easily distracted by shiny objects, in this case wind turbines and solar panels. While this cynicism is certainly justified when it comes to most of the traditional media, I actually think most of the voters are smarter than McCain believes.

This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

The real irony being

The real irony being how the media is punishing Barack for the "DoubleTalk".

Each of which is

  1. McCain challenged Barack to take Federal Campaign Funds with Spending Limits.  Something McCain was unwilling to do in the Primary.

  2. McCain challenged Barack to go to Iraq. Something McCain has only done with a whole Batallion guarding him, while claiming how safe the place is.

  3. McCain challenged Barack to Town Hall meetings. But at the same time he loves the concept of planting audience members to ask softball questions...  Something FOX's Roger Aile's came up with as a strategist for the Reagan campaign.

Notice a pattern?

-David Ahlport
McCain on the other hand

McCain on the other hand
Is just flip flopping on every issue that he personally held, (i.e. No gimmicky "Challenge" involved) that supposedly set him apart from the GOP.

Remolding himself into a lockstep Republican.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioy90nF2anI&feature=re ...
http://greyfalcon.net/mccain
http://greyfalcon.net/mccain2

Which takes away his "I choose policies that are different from the GOP" supposed "Maverick" stance near entirely.

-David Ahlport

Solar Tag-A-Longs

All that a Senator can do is vote on subsidies.  If the person feels that private industry is taking care of the problem, then a fiscal conservative will not vote for subsidies.

McCain has consistently opposed pork of all kinds.

We already see solar energy companies, funded by Google and others, taking off in the market.   They don't need subsidies.   They need customers...which they are getting.

Being a "tag along" and saying "ooo, ooo, I'll subsidize" something that is already going great is silly.

Or not

=McCain has consistently opposed pork of all kinds.=

Except from obvious exceptions, for instance subsidizing Nuclear power to the tune of half-a-trillion dollars.

_

Besides which, the PTC which McCain refuses to authorize has been approved for nearly the next decade.

http://www.snl.com/interactivex/article.aspx?CdId=A-73782 ...

And thats only one of the many lavish subsidies Nuclear power gets.

-David Ahlport

Hey Romm

I need to verify the source, but if this is true, then McCain/Gingrich/Bush's "Drill Drill Drill" mantra is busted.


The federal Minerals Management Service reports that out of the almost 9 billion barrels of oil that are thought to exist offshore, 80 percent of them are already open to the industry, mostly in the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska.
http://www.alternet.org/environment/90828/


-David Ahlport
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks