Rare Iguanas Struggle for Survival as Island Population Grows

by Ben Block on July 3, 2008

Blue iguanasWhen a team of volunteers with the Blue Iguana Recovery Program arrived to work at their Grand Cayman Island breeding center last month, they were shocked by what they found: someone had savagely attacked the program's endangered reptiles, eventually killing seven. Investigators have found no suspects.

The killings were a major blow to the recovery of the rare blue iguana, found only on Grand Cayman, a 262-square-kilometer limestone outcropping in the western Caribbean. As few as 10 of the animals existed in 2002, but the breeding program has since increased the population to about 340.

The brutal attack, however, has brought considerable attention to the plight of the iguana. Donations have poured in from across the island and around the world. "We can't put value on the death of seven iguanas-that's infinite-but since it's happened we are managing benefits from it," said Fred Burton, director of the recovery program.

While the increased awareness is helping Burton improve security at the breeding center, the major threat to the iguanas may be a more difficult fix: human population growth. The rising number of human residents is a problem that is challenging the recovery of island species not just in the Caribbean, but around the world.

An influx of immigrants to Grand Cayman, which has among the world's highest living standards, has led population size to jump 32.5 percent since 2000, according to Caribbean Community Secretariat statistics. In recent decades, the iguanas were nearly driven to extinction with the construction of highways and the expansion of residential areas. As the number of residents continues to grow, these habitat pressures will likely continue.

Other island nations are facing similar challenges. Human populations in the Caribbean and Pacific are averaging a 1 percent annual growth, due in part to persistent high fertility rates and poor access to reproductive health services. On the Marshall Islands, Samoa, and the Solomon Islands in the Pacific, more than 40 percent of the population is younger than 15 years, according to Secretariat of the Pacific Community statistics.

The land and natural resources required by rising human populations, coupled with the pressures of global climate change and the spread of invasive species, have made island species among the most threatened in the world. Of the 724 recorded animal extinctions over the past 400 years, about half were island species, according to the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Recent conservation drives are beginning to preserve more island territory. Through the Global Island Partnership, a government-led initiative launched in 2006, Micronesia, Grenada, and Jamaica have promised that at least 20 percent of their terrestrial and marine areas will be protected by 2020.

In Grand Cayman, a new conservation law to be debated in the legislative assembly in August could lay the groundwork for a system of protected areas on the island. Meanwhile, the government has been negotiating an agreement that may set aside shrubland for the blue iguana. "What we need is an area of shrubland large enough to accommodate an estimated 1,000 animals to have a self-sustaining wild population," said Gina Petrie, director of the island's Department of Environment.

As the memory of the iguana attacks continues to resonate in the minds of Grand Cayman residents, support for iguana conservation remains high, Burton said. But he acknowledges that steady population growth leaves him with only a short window of opportunity. "We don't have a lot of time to secure the protected areas," he said. "If we lose a couple of years, we'll find the options we're looking at now won't be options anymore."

Ben Block is a staff writer with the Worldwatch Institute. He can be reached at bblock@worldwatch.org.

Comments

In some ways a benefit of

In some ways a benefit of Global Warming and Global Dimming will be the reduction of the human population (how easy to type). At the same time this means greater danger if not obliteration of coastal species (anyone for making a few thousand floating islands out of tires and the like? Call them Life Boats for the Wild). It's going to be bad enough when one considers our capacity to respond to major catastrophes, e.g. New Orleans and then add millions of wild creatures also fleeing the rising waters. Perhaps we need an Ark Project to make the islands now which ought to give them time to gather barnacles, weed, guano etc. We might even need them ourselves ala Kevin Costner's Seaworld(?). (Pity we are depleting the fish stocks so voraciously). So we have polar bears slowly moving south and, no doubt, the creatures who do not want to be meals will also move south. We can add Kodiak, black, brown bears moving inland from the coast: and we already have experience of our true "domination of Nature" when we read of small children being dragged off by the head in some US suburbs as Old Man Coyote proves to be a little more than a story and a sound on a Western. Another Greayt Flood in slowmo this time which ought to allow us time to work together with our species and all the others. Except when i read and hear about carbon sequestration and "clean" coal i tend not to have much hope given our powerful need to demonstrate the Ostrich Syndrome whilst the money grubbers only seem to be able to move according to some sort of primitive reaction. Still and all i'm happy the reason is you see it's come our turn to leave the stage and exit humanity, (apologies to Frank Sinatra and Shakespeare).

Talk about fiddling whilst

Talk about fiddling whilst Rome burns. The world population crisis becomes clear to some when broken down to a small region such as the Grand Cayman Island but goes largely unheeded as the picture gets larger. The same situation is relevant globally as locally. There were 1 billion humans on earth in 1825. In 1960 the world population reached 3 million. Just 50 years later the world population approaches 7 billion and out of control. This is the root of problems with the environment, climate, resource depletion and species extinction. Clearly many cannot or will not accept the connection, particularly economists, politicians, business leaders and the religious leaders who appear to be hard wired for short term thinking and unable to comprehend a bigger picture. Greed and growth are good. Our numbers must be commensurate with the carrying capacity of the life support systems of this planet and in this case Grand Cayman Island. There is simply too many of us. There needs to be a massive education program and even legislation to reduce the growth in human numbers to a sustainable level before demand for food and production of waste products overwhelms the few survivors and our species extinction ensues. Indeed, Jarrod Diamond in his excellent book 'Collapse' wonders what the last Easter Islander was thinking as he cut down the last palm tree. If human population threatens the iguana as it must, then no amount of simple fixes will do. It just puts off the fatal day. Why cannot planners and organisations like yours see that? Most environmentalists and politicians seem to think that if we cut back our consumption and emissions by various percentages, then all will be well. Don’t worries about the growth in consumers, some one may get upset. So we will build refuges for our depleting species and all will be well. I think not. Humans will take these over as the unrelenting plague moves on. We cannot mess around and be nice any more. I know World Watch treads slowly and does not wish to upset the masses that breed on. However, the environment does not respond to percentages but to absolutes. When the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere reaches 500 ppm due to our numbers exceeding the carrying capacity of the planet, it looks like it will all be over for us and the iguanas; and that time is not far away. Institutes like yours can make a difference if you have the insight and courage to publicly discuss the real bottom line; issues of bourgeoning population both at home and internationally. Cutbacks per capita, without reducing the number of caputs, are just a sideshow.