On GameSpot: 12 free massively multiplayer games
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

June 4th, 2007

OpenDocument or OpenXML: Do you care?

Posted by Phil Windley @ 1:11 pm

Categories: General, Open Source, IT Management, Polls

Tags: XML, OpenDocument Format, Phil Windley

A week or so ago, I published a podcast at IT Conversation with Scott Mace interviewing Gary Edwards about OpenDocument. Edwards is the president of the OpenDocument Foundation. OpenDocument Foundation is a non-profit that works to promote the OpenDocument file format–an XML file format for office documents.

There’s no question that businesses want an XML-based file format for office data. The question, naturally, is which XML-based file format. Microsoft has it’s own XML-based file format called OpenXML.

Longtime readers of this blog will know that this issue was big news a while back when Massachusetts opted to require OpenDocument as the official file format for state documents.

In the podcast, Edwards makes the point that adopting OpenXML means lock-in to Microsoft products on an unprecedented scale. Microsoft counters that OpenDocument can’t support everything they need to do to build the product their customers want. Edwards counters with detailed and sometimes subtle arguments, but his primary point is that OpenDocument will work for everything.

If this sort of thing is important to you, you’ll probably enjoy hearing Edwards’ take on the issue. In the meantime, I’m curious what you think about it.

Where does your company stand in the OpenDocument/OpenXML debate?

View Results

Loading ... Loading …

Phil Windley is an Associate Professor of Computer Science at Brigham Young University. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 13 Talkback(s)
M$ Needs to get Word '07 to Work Properly with their own OpenXML format
A Microsoft Office 2007 “Program Manager” named Zeyad Rajabi posted an article on the Word 2007’s Team Blog titled “Compatibility in Word 2007 – Part IV” (Read the rest)
Posted by: funnybroad@... Posted on: 07/16/07 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Chorus Yagotta B. Kidding   | 06/04/07
"... unprecedented scale..." Anton Philidor   | 06/04/07
Mostly Agreed Mercutio_Viz   | 06/04/07
Bits and Pieces Yagotta B. Kidding   | 06/04/07
Some points you did not consider bportlock   | 06/04/07
Short answer, NO! TripleII   | 06/04/07
Facts not in evidence TripleII   | 06/04/07
If MS has their way, yes. dave.leigh@...   | 06/04/07
"When the new version of Microsoft Office is on almost . . ." JLHenry   | 06/05/07
I care, because ODF is about the future zaine_ridling   | 06/04/07
Second that motion thumbknuckle   | 06/06/07
this is more about M$ Control than customer Operability. in a perfect world wessonjoe   | 06/06/07
M$ Needs to get Word '07 to Work Properly with their own OpenXML format funnybroad@...   | 07/16/07

What do you think?

2 Trackbacks

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/wp-trackback.php?p=5264

  • Microsoft Softwares
    Forbes - Windows Vista, Office 2007 and Exchange 2007 Compatibility The FaxPress Plus 5.0 client is fully compatible with all editions of 32- and 64-bit versions of Windows Vista, as well as Microsoft’s new Office 2007 suite and ...

    Trackback by MS Office — June 5, 2007 @ 4:55 am

  • Folks like vendor lock-in?
    I was just purusing ZDNet and came across this blog on document formats and after voting was astounded to see that the current voting (only 68 votes mind you) 43% had voted for "My company will stick with whatever Microsoft serves up"! So, if I understand this, nearly half of

    Trackback by Anonymous — June 6, 2007 @ 3:00 am

Essential Topics Click Here

Business Productivity Center

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs