On The Insider: Goodbye, TRL
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 9th, 2008

Why do Macs need so much fixing?

Posted by Ed Bott @ 1:21 pm

Categories: Windows Vista, Apple

Tags: Apple Macintosh, Operating System, Apple Inc., Apple Mac OS, Desktops, Operating Systems, Software, Hardware, Ed Bott

Last weekend, in the course of a column about Steve Ballmer, my colleague Larry Dignan tossed an offhand shout-out in my general direction:

When Ed Bott has a series on how to fix–or at least cope with Vista–you know this OS isn’t so hot. Why should this thing need so much fixing?

And the TalkBack section of my series on Fixing Vista (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3) has drawn the same sort of comments, usually from diehard ABMers.

To which I say, give me a freakin’ break. I’ve made an entire career out of helping people become more productive with Windows, which includes explaining how things work, how to customize system settings and features, and, yes, how to fix problems. And here’s a news flash: I have peers on the Apple side of the universe who make their living exactly the same way. In fact, maybe the real question should be, Why does the Mac OS need so much fixing? Consider the evidence:

MacFixIt.com is an enormously popular website that offers up a veritable gold mine of solutions to help people fix problems with the Mac OS. (It doesn’t always “just work”?) Ironically, it’s a CNET property. Yes, that’s right, the same company that owns ZDNet.

And speaking of three-part series on fixing computer operating systems… I was floored to find a 1500-word post called How to Fix the Finder 1: Faster, written by one of the most passionate Mac advocates around: It begins: “The Mac OS X Finder is at the top of everyone’s fix-it list. Here’s a look at what’s wrong with the Finder, and ideas for fixing it.” And that was just the first installment in (ahem) a three-part series that continued with the 1200-word part 2 (Smarter) and the 1600-word part 3 (Prettier). That’s 4300 words on how to fix just the file manager in the Mac OS.

A few months ago, MacWorld published a lengthy article called Fix Mac slowdowns. It’s filled with headings like “Web browsing is too slow” and “E-mail takes forever” and (my favorite) “Everything is too slow,” which includes this familiar advice:

If everything you do on your Mac seems to take much longer than it once did, look for several common system problems, as well as individual programs that are outdated or are simply using more than their fair share of your Mac’s resources.

There’s a site called TroubledMac.com that offers a $15 e-book called Fix a Troubled Mac: A Mac OS X Troubleshooting Guide. And I found a lengthy article called Fixing Mac Glitches and Sluggishness at a site called Lowendmac.com.

Maybe this is a trend. Just this week, ZDNet’s own Jason O’Grady, half of the Apple Core blogging team, wondered aloud if Mac OS 10.5.2 (Apple’s latest round of bug fixes for Leopard) is Apple’s own version of Vista:

I’ve heard many different complaints about Mac OS 10.5.2 since it was released, from my own Skype/podcasting problems to issues with just about everything else, including: printing, third-party wireless routers, software freezing and problems with Time Machine. The Apple discussion boards are littered with stories about all kinds of crawlers in 10.5.2 … Chuck Freedman from the PowerPage Podcast shares his problems with 10.5.2 on his MacBook Pro – he thinks it’s the buggiest software update in years. So much so, that his friend Dennis (updated to give proper credit) coined a new term for 10.5.2 – “Apple Vista.”

For the record, I think that’s a cheap shot at both Apple and Microsoft. Welcome to the 21st century, people. Personal computers are the most complicated products the average human will encounter intheir lifetime. Each one is made up of hundreds of internal and external parts chosen from millions of alternative sources, run by software that consists of millions of lines of code, and infinitely customizable.

The surprise is not that these complex products occasionally need fixing, but rather that they work so well, so often, for so many people.

(Oh, and I hope my Linux-loving readers won’t feel left out. For equal opportunity’s sake, I could have found ten times as many websites and articles for Linux users, not because Linux is more troublesome but because there are so many distros.)

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 224 Talkback(s)
Tool Using Primates
I think TripleII says it all:

'Honestly, in 9 years now of Linux use, I can't think of a single application that has ever stopped working of it's own volition. Maintenance, I never do any unles... (Read the rest)
Posted by: HexHammer67 Posted on: 06/07/08 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
All depends on your purpose John L. Ries   | 05/09/08
All I did was remove unwanted programs. ye   | 05/09/08
Which is why... John L. Ries   | 05/09/08
It's your opinion Ed Bott  ZDNet | 05/09/08
I may have to try again John L. Ries   | 05/09/08
I encourage you to do just that Ed Bott  ZDNet | 05/09/08
SP1 brings Vista out of BETA toadlife   | 05/09/08
The Market Has Spoken, Vista Sucks chessmen   | 05/10/08
LOL. I guess it is the perception thing again GuidingLight   | 05/11/08
Even If Vista Gets Fixed, Is It Worth It? chessmen   | 05/12/08
Microsoft good at marketing? Ed Bott  ZDNet | 05/13/08
What does that prove? garry_k@...   | 05/11/08
Sounds like Ed is on to something daMan25   | 05/12/08
LOL! I can't believe you think other OSes don't require... ye   | 05/09/08
Preloads should not require fixing... John L. Ries   | 05/09/08
Two things: ye   | 05/09/08
I agree: Preloads should not require fixing. GuidingLight   | 05/11/08
Maybe it's a problem with some people garry_k@...   | 05/11/08
RE: Why do Macs need so much fixing? ross2000   | 05/09/08
My point exactly (nt) Ed Bott  ZDNet | 05/09/08
I guess we're both the luckiest people in the world. ye   | 05/09/08
Come come now klumper   | 05/10/08
You are right, although... ross2000   | 05/10/08
I'll go one better klumper   | 05/10/08
Windows ME eh? garry_k@...   | 05/11/08
Perception matters - and the masses spoke klumper   | 05/12/08
I'm with you there ross salah.ahmed@...   | 05/12/08
OS X 10.4 works fine for me bmeacham98@...   | 05/09/08
Why are proprietary OSes of such poor quality. TripleII   | 05/09/08
Complexity Ed Bott  ZDNet | 05/09/08
Further Beta testing... Wolfie2K3   | 05/10/08
Vista beta testing devlin_X   | 05/10/08
The "undoing" has nothing to do with Vista ye   | 05/09/08
That's what I said. TripleII   | 05/09/08
My undoing consisted of going to... ye   | 05/09/08
Did you also RUN the command <<<regedit>>> Non_Zealot   | 05/10/08
Reg cleaning not necessary Ed Bott  ZDNet | 05/10/08
Hope you're referring to OEM add-ons only klumper   | 05/10/08
Did I mention that I used regedit? ye   | 05/10/08
10 hours TripleII   | 05/10/08
Someone like yourself rtk   | 05/10/08
No disks, restore partition has same crapware. TripleII   | 05/10/08
Again: What has this to do with Vista? ye   | 05/10/08
See my original point, others included. TripleII   | 05/10/08
And have anti-trust regulators all over them ye   | 05/10/08
You did not... LiquidLearner   | 05/12/08
Also LiquidLearner   | 05/12/08
Defrga is not "constant" Ed Bott  ZDNet | 05/12/08
... Linux User 147560   | 05/09/08
The distinction you appear to be having a problem with is... ye   | 05/09/08
... Linux User 147560   | 05/09/08
I did? Where? (nt) ye   | 05/10/08
That's just it , and you stated it ye ,,, Non_Zealot   | 05/10/08
Hmmm Ed Bott  ZDNet | 05/10/08
the obvious reason rtk   | 05/10/08
Wrong answer! tomandnancyjones@...   | 05/14/08
Don't forget Solaris or dependency hell. Duke E. Love   | 05/09/08
RE: Why are proprietary OSes of such poor quality. richdave   | 05/09/08
"Once you get it going"? Did you consult with... ye   | 05/09/08
RE: "Once you get it going"? Did you consult with... richdave   | 05/09/08
It was a jab at John L. Ries and not you. (nt) ye   | 05/10/08
Linspire is junk John L. Ries   | 05/10/08
"Little or no trouble with a Linux system once it's set up." ye   | 05/10/08
Linspire whooliebacon   | 05/10/08
Upgrading too. TripleII   | 05/10/08
SOP or Coincidence? DannyO_0x98   | 05/10/08
That is an interesting theory. TripleII   | 05/10/08
you are just unambitious zupobaloop   | 05/14/08
You're kidding right? gtdworak   | 05/09/08
Not entirely fair John L. Ries   | 05/09/08
Thanks, but... Ed Bott  ZDNet | 05/09/08
Could say much the same... John L. Ries   | 05/09/08
Message has been deleted. MacCanuck   | 05/12/08
Hey MacCanuck. xuniL_z   | 05/13/08
So typical Vesicant   | 05/09/08
He has to be FreeTibet   | 05/09/08
You're funny! Ed Bott  ZDNet | 05/09/08
RE: You're funny! Axsimulate   | 05/09/08
Decades! TechExec2   | 05/12/08
Decades Axsimulate   | 05/15/08
So you're the lone Vista user! comp_indiana   | 05/13/08
So, you are the lone non-Vista user! xuniL_z   | 05/13/08
MS Shill Axsimulate   | 05/15/08
I'll only give it a 4 John L. Ries   | 05/09/08
Question Stan57   | 05/10/08
Why toss Linux in at the end. storm14k   | 05/09/08
Linux fans swear Linux just works. ye   | 05/09/08
Lame attempt storm14k   | 05/09/08
Lame attempt? You just made my point. ye   | 05/09/08
Liar soonerproud   | 05/10/08
... Linux User 147560   | 05/10/08
Yes I am saying that soonerproud   | 05/13/08
Try several thousand PCs xuniL_z   | 05/13/08
O RLY? Barmaglot   | 05/11/08
Those examples are pretty lame (nt) none none   | 05/09/08
We're in agreement. Those posts are lame. ye   | 05/10/08
No, you must concede on point. TripleII   | 05/10/08
No, I don't have to concede that point. ye   | 05/10/08
... Linux User 147560   | 05/10/08
Those tests also showed Vista faster than XP on... ye   | 05/10/08
Ye never concedes anything (NT) John L. Ries   | 05/12/08
I don't? Then what do you call this: ye   | 05/12/08
Easy mistake to make John L. Ries   | 05/12/08
@John L. Ries: Not if you bother to read and understand... ye   | 05/12/08
Hardly a concession b8375629@...   | 05/12/08
We're not in agreement none none   | 05/11/08
A lot escapes you. ye   | 05/11/08
Well, no... Henry Miller   | 05/12/08
hell, EVERYTHING needs fixing now and then! lostarchitect   | 05/09/08
Not according to ABMers. ye   | 05/09/08
Maybe you can let us speak for ourselves John L. Ries   | 05/09/08
I already gave two examples. Here they are again: ye   | 05/09/08
Not claims of no problems John L. Ries   | 05/09/08
Look up the word "implied" ye   | 05/10/08
Look up the word "reaching" MacCanuck   | 05/12/08
@MacCanuck: Repeating something ad infinitum... ye   | 05/12/08
After all the beta testing and delays... b8375629@...   | 05/12/08
sure, some do. lostarchitect   | 05/09/08
That would be welcome. ye   | 05/10/08
But you won't stop... msalzberg   | 05/10/08
We'll see should I ever start. ye   | 05/11/08
You haven't answered my question. msalzberg   | 05/11/08
@msalzberg: Should I ever start perhaps I could answer your question. ye   | 05/11/08
There was an article in the NY Times.. msalzberg   | 05/11/08
@msalzberg: You can't help being in denial. ye   | 05/11/08
RE: hell, everything needs fixing... bfilipiak@...   | 05/12/08
You tell 'em Ed ;) btw Linux next! klumper   | 05/09/08
Wow Ed someone hit a sore spot? devlin_X   | 05/09/08
Eh, can hardly blame him beoz   | 05/09/08
Ed's proof??? martin23   | 05/12/08
Sore spots... Wolfie2K3   | 05/10/08
RE: Why do Macs need so much fixing? robdern   | 05/09/08
Got some facts to support that allegation? ye   | 05/09/08
Try APE issues MacCanuck   | 05/12/08
All this proves is that a subset of Mac issues are realted to... ye   | 05/12/08
thats actually very true... doh123   | 05/10/08
RE: Why do Macs need so much fixing? UrbanBard   | 05/09/08
RE: Why do Macs need so much fixing? g_keramidas@...   | 05/09/08
Microsoft's not listening...? Wolfie2K3   | 05/10/08
Why do you put up with this, Bott? outsidewhale   | 05/09/08
RE: Why do Macs need so much fixing? none none   | 05/09/08
why is this controversial? marks055@...   | 05/10/08
Break granted. johnfenjackson@...   | 05/10/08
Good old Ed... Jeremy W   | 05/10/08
As if Mac platform is even comparable to Windows platform for most users timiteh   | 05/10/08
If he's going to spread FUD at least he could make it believable. ye   | 05/10/08
My heart breaks... TucsonGuy   | 05/13/08
Fundamental assumption of post is incorrect Jeremy W   | 05/11/08
Most of your post is wrong, or simply opinion. rtk   | 05/11/08
Could please be a bit objective please timiteh   | 05/11/08
I don't think Jeremy W can understand you ibarskiy@...   | 05/12/08
RE:I don't think Jeremy W can understand you timiteh   | 05/12/08
That's the point B.Beck   | 05/12/08
Re: As if Mac platform is even comparable to Windows platform for most user none none   | 05/11/08
What about professional/enterprise stuff ? timiteh   | 05/11/08
Are you the only... msalzberg   | 05/11/08
No but i am quite representative of computer related enterprise user timiteh   | 05/11/08