On last.fm: Check Out Radiohead Music, Events & Pics
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

December 13th, 2006

Usability on the web is a sham

Posted by Ryan Stewart @ 12:10 am

Categories: Rich Internet Applications, Experience

Tags:

Grab your lighters people, because this may get me some flames, but it is something that's been on my mind for a while and the past couple of weeks have shown just how important experience is and how badly the traditional web does it. Humans have always been emotional creatures. We make irrational decisions based on feelings we develop attachments to things for the strangest reasons and we are profoundly affected by external stimuli. Rich Internet Applications are like the passionate, interesting Scottie on Star Trek but the web browser is Spock; technologically sound but devoid of feeling. (You're thinking "Star Trek? What?" Oh yeah, I went there.)

Accessibility and standards are still very important parts of the web because information needs to be available to everyone, but dismissing the next generation of RIAs because they don't fit into the current model is short sighted.For the longest time the web didn't offer anything in the way of a good user experience. It was based on text and used to exchange academic information. Interactivity wasn't ever a part of the mix and the touchy-feely notion of experience was far from the minds of the scientists at CERN (Though in fairness, they were off winning Nobel Prizes). But then more people started checking out the web. It became a marketplace, a communication platform and a social medium. It opened up to regular people and they expected more than the rigid world of text and documents. As this happened, people conjured up the notion of "usability" so that the web could be a more friendly place. We have rules about the way things should behave on the web so that it is more accessible to people. Never mind that from the very beginning the whole system was never meant for real human experiences.

Let me give you an example. The back button. People complain about Flash breaking the back button and how it hurts usability. But how usable is a back button? What other place in our daily lives do we have a back button? There are a lot of "Undo buttons" but no back buttons. A back button is great for the document model where you move from page to page but how do you try to implement a back button for a movie or for an application that evolves as the user interacts with it? You can't. "Usability on the web" has come to mean usability in a web browser, but increasingly we're accessing the web outside the browser. Why should the old rules apply to things that are meant to work beyond the browser? Why disregard technologies that leverage the web in a different (sometimes more effective) way than the traditional browser.

I'm not trying to dismiss the studies and work that have gone into making the web better, because all of those are good things. But a model of text and rigidity runs contrary to how humans think. We’re chaotic and we value emotion. As a result, we are drawn to the parts of the web that gives us those things. That's why Ajax has been so big and why video has exploded. They changed the rules and made things behave more like we wanted them to. But this is only the beginning of what's possible, which is the reason Rich Internet Applications are poised to continue to impact how we use the web. These technologies give designers and developers absolute control over how the world appears to users. They aren't restricted by the rules of a browser model that is 10 years old. They can build the web with multimedia and interactivity that grabs people and speaks to their emotional sides.

Accessibility and standards are still very important parts of the web because information needs to be available to everyone, but dismissing the next generation of RIAs because they don't fit into the current model is short sighted. Good development and design teams can build world class RIAs that are interactive as well as accessible. Trying to imprint usability guidelines that are based on the browser in blanket fashion on the web is going to stifle innovation and make the web less friendly. We finally have the technology to really envelop users in the web and bring them experiences that mean something. That's more powerful than any standard and it's a huge reason why RIAs will be so successful.

Ryan Stewart, a Rich Internet Application developer and industry analyst, recently joined Adobe's Platform Team as a Rich Internet Application Evangelist. See his full disclosure.
  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 84 Talkback(s)
You must be using MSIE
Try Netscape, Mozilla or Firefox. The Back button on these browsers really works, unlike Microsoft's rather half-hearted implementation.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Andrew P. Posted on: 01/17/07 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Agreed Danny-T   | 12/13/06
No back button? jefferson.harris@...   | 12/13/06
The problem isn't the Back button, it's the Flash designers AxleMunshine   | 12/13/06
Exactly!!! chanthing   | 12/13/06
agree with AxleMunshine jimk_z   | 12/13/06
Agreed...and puzzled Langalibalene   | 12/13/06
Yes it's nfg dragon@...   | 12/13/06
There is no "wow" in knowledge mikehughes   | 12/13/06
Books jctech1943   | 12/13/06
Back Buttons and Clutches rdgrimes   | 12/13/06
You're forgetting wcb42ad   | 12/13/06
Is Flash/Flex having a “user friendly” issue? way_z   | 12/13/06
Yes, Back Button zclayton2   | 12/14/06
Usability or standards? daveklein   | 12/13/06
Backbutton bgurman45@...   | 12/13/06
Static presentation vs. dynamic application wjc   | 12/13/06
Desktop Apps > Browser ggibson1   | 12/13/06
wish this was true jccq   | 12/13/06
Beyond the Browser ... you will hear this alot more soon ggibson1   | 12/13/06
i didnt say that OS are going away.. jccq   | 12/13/06
Entitled to your opinion ggibson1   | 12/13/06
Can You aallord   | 12/13/06
Real Basic jmusto@...   | 12/13/06
Never once needed to in the past 2 decades. ggibson1   | 12/14/06
User expectations work against universality Is the back button necessary? Patanjali   | 12/16/06
The PC is for applications, the net is for connectivity and information Fujikid2   | 12/13/06
You got it right, bro dockc   | 12/13/06
Turning Desktop Apps into Net Apps MVRH   | 12/13/06
It already is possible. ggibson1   | 12/13/06
Desktop as a Service MVRH   | 12/13/06
Thin Client ggibson1   | 12/13/06
No Thin Client! MVRH   | 12/13/06
Hmmm Linux User 147560   | 12/13/06
Back Button? Is that the best you can do? bob@...   | 12/13/06
Back Button is for reading Apps are not books ggibson1   | 12/13/06
Flash isnt gbruno   | 12/13/06
Huh... vlatko_z   | 12/13/06
Please stop projecting and get some real experience escoles@...   | 12/13/06
"Richness" VS Access Grammyputer   | 12/13/06
Good topic, not so good treatment carlos_z   | 12/13/06
Good points daveklein   | 12/13/06
So, the Web Forks?. nottheusual1   | 12/13/06
Browse My PC? TomHobbes   | 12/13/06
Yes it is a sham! MVRH   | 12/13/06
Greed? curmudgeon1   | 12/13/06
I make money because my app is better than yours ggibson1   | 12/13/06
Right On! rdgrimes   | 12/13/06
Excellent post. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/13/06
Standards or usability? daveklein   | 12/13/06
Excellent point dale.hurt@...   | 12/15/06
Exactly theomiller   | 12/13/06
Isn't this true of all standards? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/13/06
The real trick wcb42ad   | 12/13/06
True of all standards daveklein   | 12/13/06
Only true when No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/13/06
Backbutton om my remote rattlesnake0407   | 12/13/06
Oh really? NewCyberian   | 12/13/06
What is wrong with the “back button”? way_z   | 12/13/06
Usability? (not) - Flash hurts usability in _many_ ways FL Guy   | 12/13/06
Flash curses apta   | 12/13/06
Wrong on all counts RYeager   | 12/13/06
Back Buton = history.go(-1) johndifo   | 12/13/06
A superficial, uninformed, opinion jlanus_z   | 12/13/06
ZDNet paying too much for columnists... Narg   | 12/13/06
It shouldn't be: Design vs. User Control mokwang_lima@...   | 12/13/06
Lions, Tiger, Bears, Winforms carnac   | 12/13/06
We need the back button but dont need Flash zczc2311@...   | 12/13/06
The "back button" exists everywhere. rdhalsteatzd   | 12/13/06
Part of the Problem aallord   | 12/13/06
I WANT Back Button rxtxau   | 12/13/06
NOBODY wants something that can NOT be controlled running in their computer rdelaplaza   | 12/13/06
Standards and new tech not always so great jimk_z   | 12/13/06
Flash sites rncdoc1101@...   | 12/13/06
Usability on the web is a sham dockc   | 12/13/06
No Frames and most users webguy197_z   | 12/14/06
Time to desired result is the target for me tobias.carlen@...   | 12/14/06
Star Trek analagy mlawson66   | 12/14/06
Tabbed browsing breaks the back button too phil wainewright  ZDNet | 12/15/06
Communication basics: The BACK button. dc_patterson@...   | 12/15/06
USER FRIENDLY RULES! the_webninja@...   | 12/15/06
Ryan's post: majorly mis-informed or just pointlessly provocative ??? BannedInBoston   | 12/17/06
Sorry about the (unintended) bold text BannedInBoston   | 12/17/06
Do you know what usability is? mmdeaton@...   | 12/20/06
You must be using MSIE Andrew P.   | 01/17/07

What do you think?

7 Trackbacks

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Stewart/wp-trackback.php?p=196

  • Usability on the web is a sham
    When I saw the title, I knew I would have to post it even before I read the article, even if just to incite Matt. The post is a little light on meat, but worth a quick read. Probably the most relevant quote is: ...

    Trackback by The schablog — December 13, 2006 @ 4:16 pm

  • New action needed on the Web
    This article is of interest for those following the action on the new Web. The author says that the plain old text pages of the past 15 years are pretty dull, and the new visual capabilities of the web, collaboration, photo and video ...

    Trackback by Computer Lunch Bunch — December 13, 2006 @ 7:57 pm

  • links for 2006-12-14
    Cairo graphics engiine. Cairo is a 2D graphics library with support for multiple output devices, including the FF3, X Window System, Win32, image buffers, and PostScript, PDF, and SVG file output. Experimental backends include OpenGL ...

    Trackback by All in a days work... — December 14, 2006 @ 1:24 am

  • Links for 2006-12-13 [del.icio.us]
    » Usability on the web is a sham | The Universal Desktop | ZDNet.com. Tanya Merone - Online Portfolio.

    Trackback by Anonymous — December 14, 2006 @ 3:00 am

  • Why RIAs Should Bust Out Of The Browser Box
    Ryan brings up some good points in his Usability on the web is a sham article.

    Trackback by Anonymous — December 14, 2006 @ 3:00 am

  • Three links: EU, OSS and web usability
    And one on usability: Usability on the web is a sham | The Universal Desktop | ZDNet.com. Arguing that the browser metaphor’s time is past and...

    Trackback by Anonymous — December 16, 2006 @ 3:00 am

  • ZDNet.com, The Universal Desktop, 13.12.2006: Usability on the web...
    ZDNet.com, The Universal Desktop, 13.12.2006: Usability on the web is a sham ... by Ryan Stewart: "Accessibility and standards are still very...

    Trackback by Anonymous — December 22, 2006 @ 3:00 am

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

advertisement
Click Here