On GameSpot: BlizzCon 2008: Diablo III's wizard
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

January 24th, 2008

Is Microsoft tinkering with Live Search results?

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 5:03 am

Categories: Windows client, Windows Live, Corporate strategy, Windows 7, Search

Tags: Blog, Microsoft Corp., Search Result, Blogging, Internet, Mary Jo Foley

Is Microsoft filtering out from its Live Search results those it considers “undesirable” for the company?

That’s what one of my tipsters has suggested with some interesting evidence, involving a blog known as “Shipping Seven.”

Shipping Seven is penned anonymously by someone who has said s/he is part of the Windows 7 team at Microsoft. As one might assume, given Microsoft management’s  decision to be less transparent about its future plans, Microsoft is not too fond of the Shipping Seven blog. Company officials have declined to comment in any way on the blog, as well as on Windows 7, the version of Windows expected in 2009 or 2010.

Is Microsoft tinkering with Live Search results?Try this. Go to Live Search (www.live.com) and type in “‘Shipping Seven’ blog.” The results? Lots of blogs and news sites talking about the Shipping Seven blog. But no link to the Shipping Seven blog itself (at least not in the first several pages of results I examined).

Now try the same query in Google search. The direct link to the Shipping Seven blog is the fourth link. On Yahoo Search , the same search yields as result No. 1 the actual Shipping Seven blog link.

Coincidence? Crack down? Microsoft’s statement, delivered via a company spokesman:

“Results in Live Search are based solely on our algorithms and the frequency in which the engine crawls a particular site, we don’t editorialize the organic results of search queries.”

Seems like somebody needs to tweak an algorithm over on the Live Search team….

Mary Jo has covered the tech industry for more than 20 years. Don't miss a single post. Subscribe via Email or RSS. Got a tip? Send Mary Jo your rants, rumors, tips and tattles. For disclosure on Mary Jo's industry affiliations, click here.
  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 59 Talkback(s)
Well, they did a comparison on here
and LIVE was found to be as good as Google.
I use nothing but MS Live search now. It's more relevant than Google where the results are for sale to the highest bidder.
And the Live form... (Read the rest)
Posted by: xuniL_z Posted on: 01/28/08 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Just goes to show you why no one uses Live Search pmcgrath@...   | 01/24/08
Current (global) Search Engine Rankings B.O.F.H.   | 01/24/08
Google should prepare themselves for monopoly status and start implementing DonnieBoy   | 01/24/08
Ummmm....monopolies aren't illegal. jinko   | 01/24/08
BUT, monopolis MUST abide by another set of rules. I suggest that Google DonnieBoy   | 01/24/08
Yes, the evil G$$gle... BFD   | 01/24/08
Your words, not mine. I think that Google is a great competitor that has DonnieBoy   | 01/24/08
Who are "WE"? srobtjones@...   | 01/24/08
If I were a drug dealer I might be worried. The "we" is individuals, DonnieBoy   | 01/24/08
What DB negelects to mention is the reason google GuidingLight   | 01/24/08
XiTi Monitor's search engine barometer mhenriday   | 01/26/08
10% of "nobody" uses Live Search quikboy   | 01/24/08
Nothing is beneath Microsoft. bjbrock   | 01/24/08
Sure there is something beneath Microsoft....the competition. ha ha <nt> xuniL_z   | 01/24/08
Sorry but you're way off maldain   | 01/24/08
No, he's about right John L. Ries   | 01/24/08
You underestimate the bottom Ole Man   | 01/25/08
But on the brighter side... MGP2   | 01/24/08
You have never used Google? Talk about filtering xuniL_z   | 01/24/08
Message has been deleted. theo_durcan   | 01/25/08
Come on guys, don't try to make too much of this, it is just that these DonnieBoy   | 01/24/08
Wow you are SO right... BFD   | 01/24/08
Google is not anywhere close to 90% so way to early to declare them DonnieBoy   | 01/24/08
Absolutely wrong information xuniL_z   | 01/25/08
They did NOT have the billions avaiable at Microsoft, or the years head DonnieBoy   | 01/25/08
Well I'll be. Microsoft had Billions at startup. xuniL_z   | 01/25/08
We are talking SEARCH here. This article is about SEARCH. MS had billions DonnieBoy   | 01/25/08
Geez Donnie, don't blow a gasket xuniL_z   | 01/28/08
It wouldn't be the first time they tampered... jinko   | 01/24/08
Just tried, result - 350 million denis77   | 01/24/08
Yeah, they got caught at it IT_User   | 01/24/08
So what if they do GuidingLight   | 01/24/08
Big difference there Chad_z   | 01/24/08
You're right, little consequence IT_User   | 01/24/08
What do I think? Use your options. DaffyDuck   | 01/24/08
A very sensible post. <nt> xuniL_z   | 01/24/08
I agree, no conspiracy, it is just that MS search does not work very well. DonnieBoy   | 01/24/08
Yes 51.4 billion GuidingLight   | 01/24/08
Mammon thungurknifur   | 01/25/08
Wow, Paris Hilton must be VERY smart bmerc   | 01/25/08
Google tampers with its results also hsvessel@...   | 01/24/08
Silly argument bmerc   | 01/25/08
As more info resides on the web... wmlundine   | 01/24/08
Google: just as guilty? EJHonda   | 01/24/08
Not google problem theo_durcan   | 01/26/08
GUILTY!! GUILTY!! GUILTY!! TechExec2   | 01/24/08
Incompetent of Cheating - who cares? Jeremy W   | 01/24/08
Microsoft - smell the fear, feel the force whisperycat   | 01/24/08
Censorship John Musbach   | 01/24/08
Harder to get away with in the US John L. Ries   | 01/24/08
MSFT jabailo1   | 01/24/08
Breaking your competition's kneecaps with a baseball bat bmerc   | 01/25/08
Not just search Ole Man   | 01/25/08
RE: Is Microsoft tinkering with Live Search results? cxsys1@...   | 01/26/08
RE: Is Microsoft tinkering with Live Search results? tenrun@...   | 01/26/08
IMPROVING LIVE SEARCH! ballmerstv@...   | 01/26/08
RE: Is Microsoft tinkering with Live Search results? MarkKB   | 01/27/08
Who in their right mind uses MS search anyway? kraterz   | 01/27/08
Well, they did a comparison on here xuniL_z   | 01/28/08

What do you think?

5 Trackbacks

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/wp-trackback.php?p=1127

  • Is Microsoft filtering Live Search results?
    Is Microsoft filtering out from its Live Search results those it considers "undesirable" for the company? That’s what one of my tipsters has suggested with some interesting evidence, involving a blog known as “Shipping Seven.” ...

    Trackback by D' Technology Weblog — January 24, 2008 @ 8:00 pm

  • Is MS Tinkering With Live Search Results?
    are based solely on our algorithms and the frequency in which the engine crawls a particular site, we don’t editorialize the organic results of search queries.” Seems like somebody needs to tweak an algorithm over on the Live Search team…. ZDNET Blogs

    Trackback by Anonymous — January 25, 2008 @ 3:09 am

  • Is Microsoft tinkering with Live Search results?
    7 team at Microsoft. As one might assume, given Microsoft management’s decision to be less transparent about its future plans, Microsoft is...

    Trackback by Anonymous — January 25, 2008 @ 3:09 am

  • MichaelDotNet: Interesting: http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=112...
    MichaelDotNet: Interesting: http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=112...

    Trackback by Anonymous — January 25, 2008 @ 3:09 am

  • Quick Thoughts for 1.24.08
    Gotta hate it when ambition and energy decide to take a holiday without letting you know. Goodbye Facebook :: Rick Mahn - Rick finally has enough of the whole Facebook and possibly social networks in general ...

    Trackback by WinExtra — January 25, 2008 @ 4:40 am

advertisement

Order Microsoft 2.0

Pre-order Microsoft 2.0

Order 'Microsoft 2.0' by Mary Jo Foley at Amazon.com.

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs