Both ISPs blame on declining Usenet demand.Now I'm no fan of Usenet, but many are and so it's likely sad for some to discover that several more ISPs - Comcast and RCN - have decided to discontinue offering free newsgroup services. Time Warner already did so last month. "Yea, you could say it's official. The news (nntp) service as provided by RCN is being phased out," writes Bryan Laird, Director of Product and Technology for RCN, in a blog posting. "In large part due to non usage yes there were a few (and by few I mean an incredibly small number) customers who used it however, several times that are using nntp service from a third party." RCN customers are rightly upset, with one individual comparing it to SOP for cell phone companies who seem to tell you only after they do something. The person writes:
A Comcast rep was apparently monitoring the RCN exchange on DSL Reports and decided that he should inform customers of the ISP that it planned to do the same. In fact, it was dropped immediately for new subscribers, but would be accessible by existing customers until Oct 25th. Comcastcares writes:
Some say the service was lousy anyways, but some are angry at with what they see as a trend by ISPs to steadily decrease services while simultaneously raising their subscription rates. "So will Comcast be reducing our bills since the equivalent service from Giganews is $7.99 per month?," writes one respondent. "I doubt it. Comcast just takes and takes while either raising prices or restricting/dropping services." jared@zeropaid.com |
![]() |
members that voted for this story
|











Chances are, the cost of running the service was too high (likely profit margine based and not economics based) and they dropped their service. Usenet is an excellent resource for materials and I certainly knew the difference when my ISP dropped the service. It's like suddenly losing a massive private BitTorrent site that didn't enforce ratios even though everyone uploaded huge amounts as if they were enforced. Trust me, even just a few days of retention, it's at least as good as BitTorrent. Premium services just overshadow BitTorrent in terms of content and speeds. Since it was relatively complex for beginners, n00bs usually were kept off the system (which is both good and bad)
If you pay for a premium service, it's a third party. If an ISP were to block the protocol, a) premium services woudl be down their throats for lost revenues and b) large corporations would be twisting the ISPs ears because they can't message collegues like they usually do.