Heartlessgamer.com gaming blog. MMORPGs and more!

Packers Are The Worst Team In The League Falcons 9-24-2026

2026-09-25T09:19:59.700-04:00

The Packers game last night did not go well as they lost to the Falcons 35-14. Going into the game there was serious discussion the Falcons would go winless this year. Well they looked like dominant super bowl contenders against the Packers so I guess that means the Packers are now the worst team in the league. It's going to be a year.

Packers Escape Jets 9-20-2026

2026-09-20T17:00:00.000-04:00

Oh boy I am glad I get to post a meme that doesn't involve the thousand yard stare this week. The Green Bay Packers squeaked out a win against the NY Jets. Not a pretty game by any means but a win is a win. Go Pack Go!

Packers Something Something Vikings 9-13-2026

2026-09-14T17:31:56.801-04:00

The Green Bay Packers picked up the 2026 season right where they left off the 2025 season: with an improbable fourth quarter collapse. There was a pivotal moment where the Packers could have gone up 25-17 after making a field goal, but a penalty on the Vikings caused them to reconsider and they tried to QB sneak on 4th and short. Jordan Love came up short and the game spiraled from that point onward. In a close game where the offense was not executing smoothly it was a dumb call to take points off the board. There were some terrible penalties called by the refs through the game but unlike other Packers fans I can't solely blame the zebras here; especially when the Packers gave up 29 unanswered points. On a positive note at least our field goal kicker made a 59 yard field goal.

Crimson Desert Is The Worst Best Game I've Played In A While

2026-07-14T09:46:29.997-04:00

Here we go again...

Crimson Desert has no right to be installed in my Steam library.

It is clunky, buggy, has terrible controls, a nonsensical story, and is full of baffling design decisions. It feels like a 10+ year old MMO shut down and, at the last second, the developers slapped together an offline single-player mode so players could still wander around the world one last time.

And somehow I'm loving it.

Also hating it.

Mostly both at the same time.

A beautiful game world

With the MMO apocalypse seemingly underway between games like New World Aeternum closing and Ashes of Creation forever existing in a perpetual state of "ain't happening", I have been itching for an open-world fantasy game to disappear into. My normal gaming group is still fully locked into ARC Raiders, so I didn't really want to dive headfirst into another MMO solo. Crimson Desert kept popping up all over gaming news and social media, and after watching some gameplay videos it looked like it might scratch that open-world RPG itch even if it wasn't multiplayer.

So I bought it.

And after several hours with the game I completely understand why the reception has been all over the place.

People praising the visuals? Correct.

People praising the open world? Also correct.

People saying the story is nonsense? Extremely correct.

People complaining the controls feel like they were designed by aliens trying to approximate human behavior? Also very correct.

Crimson Desert is a fascinating mess.

I can't resist chopping down trees

The game starts by immediately throwing you into a world that feels massive and alive, but also weirdly unfinished in places. Villages feel populated. NPCs wander around doing their own thing. There are tons of side activities like fishing, gathering, crafting, exploration, climbing, and random little interactions that make the world feel more like an MMO than a traditional single-player RPG.

Honestly, the game reminds me a lot of No Man's Sky in that way. Not because the gameplay is similar, but because the appeal comes from simply existing in the world and seeing what is over the next hill. The community feels hungry for games like this right now. Huge open worlds where exploration matters again instead of everything being reduced to fast travel markers and checklist objectives.

The thing Crimson Desert absolutely nails is giving you a world that feels worth wandering around in. There are villages to visit that aren't just combat hubs. Random caves. Weird little environmental puzzles. Mountain paths that clearly exist because someone on the development team wanted players to climb them.

And climbing in this game is actually pretty good.

Grappling, vaulting, and climbing all feel smooth enough that traversal becomes fun on its own. There is even this bizarre but amazing mechanic where holding Ctrl lets you precisely target jumps with your cursor. Instead of awkwardly lining up jumps manually, you can literally aim where you want to go and leap directly there.

I genuinely love this system.

Which is funny because almost every other control decision in the game feels completely insane.

Another amazing view

The control problems start almost immediately. Early on you walk into a camp where every NPC interaction works normally: walk up and press the interact key. Simple enough. Except the main quest NPC has an invisible wall around him, so you can't actually walk up to him. Instead, you have to notice some tiny prompt in the corner telling you to press Ctrl plus another key to interact with him from a distance.

Why?

Why does this exist?

This bizarre inconsistency continues through the entire game. Sometimes you interact normally. Sometimes you need Ctrl. Sometimes you need to equip a random tool first. Sometimes you need to hold Ctrl while holding the tool while also aiming at the correct object while standing in the exact correct position under a full moon while Mercury is in retrograde. You will literally spend time on YouTube looking up solutions only to discover the answer was “equip the broom and hold Ctrl.”!!!

Combat controls are equally chaotic.

Some attacks require left click. Others require holding both mouse buttons simultaneously. Blocking is on Ctrl instead of right mouse button like basically every game made in the last twenty years. Outside of combat, Ctrl does completely different things, so there have been multiple moments where I got ambushed while accidentally pulling out my lantern instead of blocking.

And as far as I can tell, some of these controls can't even properly be remapped.

Even sprinting is weird. Instead of holding Shift to sprint, you repeatedly tap the key to maintain speed both on foot and on horseback. Maybe some people enjoy finger cardio while traveling across the map, but I immediately installed a mod to fix that nonsense. (Note: this was patched and changed after I wrote this post up so now it is hold to sprint as it should have been all along).

Which is another funny thing about Crimson Desert: this game made me a complete hypocrite.

I complained endlessly about Marathon's UI design, yet somehow here I am tolerating a UI that is significantly worse because the game underneath it is weirdly compelling. Normally a game loses me within five minutes if the controls feel bad. Crimson Desert somehow survives that test through sheer force of ambition.

Because underneath all the jank is a genuinely incredible open world.

An overview of a location from the map

Progression is messy and unclear, but there is always something interesting nearby. The game doesn't focus exclusively on combat encounters the way many modern open-world games do. Sometimes you are just wandering through a village. Fishing. Gathering materials. Exploring ruins. Climbing mountains because they exist.

Then the game interrupts your fun with another cutscene.

And that might honestly be my biggest complaint of all.

This fantastic open-world sandbox keeps getting interrupted by a story I could not possibly care less about.

The story isn't just weak; it actively gets in the way of the game's best qualities. Early on I got stuck outside a castle because guards wouldn't let me enter without the proper clothes. The game technically gives you the required outfit through the main questline, but it was so poorly communicated that I ended up Googling the solution because I thought I had missed something.

That sort of thing happens constantly.

The game feels like it assumes you somehow already know how its systems work.

And yet despite all of this, somewhere around the Mathias fight, the game suddenly clicked for me.

I stopped trying to make Crimson Desert behave like a polished AAA RPG and started accepting it for the bizarre, over-complicated, awkward thing it actually is. Once I embraced the chaos, I started appreciating the game far more.

Because there really is something special here.

Not polished.

Not elegant.

Definitely not user friendly.

But special.

Crimson Desert feels like a giant ambitious RPG from an earlier era of gaming before every game was focus tested into safe mediocrity. It is overloaded with systems, mechanics, weird ideas, experimental controls, and questionable design decisions. Some of those ideas absolutely do not work.

But some of them really, really do.

And honestly, I think players are starving for games that swing this hard again even if they miss sometimes.

Crimson Desert is frustrating.

It is clunky.

It wastes your time.

It desperately needs quality-of-life improvements.

The UI is a disaster.

The controls are absurd.

The story constantly gets in the way.

And I cannot stop playing it.

This is easily the worst best game I've played in a long while.

The starting town that you spend a lot, and I mean a lot, of time in

Note: this post was edited with the help of AI (ChatGPT). The thoughts are my own. The grammatical correctness and em dashes (—) are the AI.

Guild Wars 3 Has Me Optimistic... and Slightly Worried

2026-06-17T10:51:59.562-04:00

Just over 16 years ago, in April 2010, we got the chance to read through the Guild Wars 2 Design Manifesto—a document I wrote about on this blog at the time. Now, in the great year of 2026, we get to do the same thing for Guild Wars 3's design philosophy. I took some time to read through ArenaNet's post and came away with a few thoughts.

ArenaNet breaks its philosophy for Guild Wars 3 into four key pillars:

No subscription fees
No pay-to-win
Respecting your time and investment
Innovating and evolving the MMORPG genre

The "no subscription fees" pillar also means no battle passes or season passes, making Guild Wars 3's monetization model look very similar to Guild Wars 2's. The game will feature expansions and a cash shop focused on convenience items and cosmetics. One thing that wasn't addressed is whether a premium currency exchange system will exist, allowing players to trade in-game gold for premium currency. Personally, I never had major issues with Guild Wars 2's monetization, so I don't expect Guild Wars 3's approach to be a problem either.

"No pay-to-win" is always a tricky topic because everyone's definition of "win" is different. ArenaNet would likely argue that Guild Wars 2 isn't pay-to-win, and from a pure power perspective that's probably true. You can't swipe a credit card and obtain gear that exceeds what other players can earn through gameplay.

That said, Guild Wars 2 does allow players to purchase gold indirectly, and gold can be converted into powerful items and progression shortcuts. While that may not create a direct power advantage, it certainly saves the buyer time and effort. There are also numerous convenience items in the Guild Wars 2 store that push the boundaries a bit. Salvage-o-Matics and enhanced gathering tools are good examples. They aren't mandatory, but they become the obvious choice compared to their standard in-game counterparts. It's a fine line, and one ArenaNet will need to continue tiptoeing around carefully.

The "respecting your time and investment" pillar boils down to ArenaNet's desire to ensure Guild Wars 3 doesn't feel like a second job. Players should be able to jump in and have fun without needing hours of preparation before meaningful gameplay begins.

This aligns closely with how Guild Wars 2 positioned itself. In practice, though, any MMORPG requires some investment to stay engaged. If you've been away from a game for months, there's always a period of re-acclimation. And perhaps this is a controversial opinion, but I think there is still a segment of the MMORPG community looking for games that demand a little more time and commitment. Based on ArenaNet's history and the Guild Wars franchise as a whole, however, Guild Wars probably isn't the place to look for that experience.

The final pillar, "innovating and evolving the MMORPG genre," is where I think we'll need more details from the Guild Wars 3 team before we can draw many conclusions. Based on what's been shared so far, it sounds like ArenaNet is aiming to land somewhere between Guild Wars 1's hub-and-spoke multiplayer design and Guild Wars 2's persistent open world filled with hundreds—or even thousands—of players.

And that's where I start to get a little concerned.

If we compare Guild Wars 3's design philosophy to Guild Wars 2's original manifesto, there's a noticeable difference in emphasis.

Guild Wars 2: (link)

The first thing you should know about Guild Wars 2 is that, this time around, there's no question that it's an MMORPG. It's an enormous, persistent, living, social world, filled with a wide variety of combat and non-combat activities.

Guild Wars 3: (link)

Guild Wars 3 lands near the middle of the MMO spectrum, which supports the goals we have for our movement and combat systems. While it fits the definition of an MMORPG significantly more than Guild Wars Reforged does, it doesn't try to replicate the large-scale gameplay pillars that so uniquely define Guild Wars 2.

Guild Wars 2's statement practically screamed "massively multiplayer," which was a welcome shift from the more limited scale of Guild Wars 1. Guild Wars 3's statement, on the other hand, reads like a deliberate effort to reduce player density and move away from large-scale shared-world experiences.

If you're someone like me who believes a persistent open world is one of the defining characteristics of an MMORPG, I think it's fair to be concerned.

Many of us imagined, many years ago, that advances in technology would lead to larger worlds with more players sharing them. Instead, after all these years, we seem to be moving in the opposite direction. Worlds are becoming smaller, player counts are shrinking, and more games are settling somewhere between traditional multiplayer titles and true MMORPGs.

Of course, it's still early. ArenaNet has only begun sharing details, and I'll be watching closely before making any sweeping declarations about where Guild Wars 3 ultimately lands on the MMO spectrum.

Overall, I think we're off to a good start with the Guild Wars 3 team. Beta testing is expected in 2027, and a 2028 launch isn't all that far away in MMO development terms.

In a year where we've ended development New World and Destiny 2 and seen long-in-development Kickstarter MMOs stumble or fail outright, it's refreshing to have genuine optimism about a new MMORPG from a developer with a proven track record.

I'll certainly be keeping a close eye on Guild Wars 3. Hopefully, ArenaNet can convince me that "middle of the MMO spectrum" still leaves room for a truly massive online world.

Note: this post was edited with the help of AI (ChatGPT). The thoughts are my own. The grammatical correctness and em dashes (—) are the AI.