<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LSE Impact</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences</link>
	<description>Understanding impact and practice in academic research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:37:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.5</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">64384046</site>	<item>
		<title>What climate policymakers could learn from platforms like Reddit</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/24/what-climate-policymakers-could-learn-from-platforms-like-reddit/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/24/what-climate-policymakers-could-learn-from-platforms-like-reddit/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 10:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence for Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experts and Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat preparedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media research]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Can forums like Reddit's r/heat_prep provide contextual and timely knowledge for policymakers grappling with the impact of extreme heat?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/24/what-climate-policymakers-could-learn-from-platforms-like-reddit/">What climate policymakers could learn from platforms like Reddit</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/24/what-climate-policymakers-could-learn-from-platforms-like-reddit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56455</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>For a decade CRediT has quietly reshaped academic authorship  – what comes next? </title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/19/for-a-decade-credit-has-quietly-reshaped-academic-authorship-what-comes-next/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/19/for-a-decade-credit-has-quietly-reshaped-academic-authorship-what-comes-next/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mcclell2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measuring Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRediT taxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research evaluation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The CredIT taxonomy has become a feature of academic publishing, but has its potential for creating research insights been fully exploited?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/19/for-a-decade-credit-has-quietly-reshaped-academic-authorship-what-comes-next/">For a decade CRediT has quietly reshaped academic authorship  – what comes next? </a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/19/for-a-decade-credit-has-quietly-reshaped-academic-authorship-what-comes-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56430</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Mega-conferences work better than their critics think </title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/12/why-mega-conferences-work-better-than-their-critics-think/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/12/why-mega-conferences-work-better-than-their-critics-think/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mcclell2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 11:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56416</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Critics attack academic mega-conferences as too big and too cliquish, favouring smaller, curated meetings as the humane alternative. For Dritjon Gruda, Bex Hewett, Joe Carpini, Kiera Dempsey-Brench, Julian Jonathan Markus, and Jorrit Alkema, scale is what makes &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/12/why-mega-conferences-work-better-than-their-critics-think/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/12/why-mega-conferences-work-better-than-their-critics-think/">Why Mega-conferences work better than their critics think </a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/12/why-mega-conferences-work-better-than-their-critics-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56416</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What counts as data in qualitative research? </title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/10/what-counts-as-data-in-qualitative-research/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/10/what-counts-as-data-in-qualitative-research/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mcclell2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Data and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualitative Data]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56394</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In research articles and reports qualitative work is often reduced to text, which is in turn analysed by human and increasingly machine readers. However, original qualitative analyses depend on a &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/10/what-counts-as-data-in-qualitative-research/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/10/what-counts-as-data-in-qualitative-research/">What counts as data in qualitative research? </a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/10/what-counts-as-data-in-qualitative-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56394</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>As impact is increasingly found in non-academic careers what skills do PhD students need now? </title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/07/as-impact-is-increasingly-found-in-non-academic-careers-what-skills-do-phd-students-need-now/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/07/as-impact-is-increasingly-found-in-non-academic-careers-what-skills-do-phd-students-need-now/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mcclell2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 11:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctoral research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research impact]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tight academic job markets and the growth of research-intensive jobs outside of academia have made hyphenated careers that combine research and impact skills increasingly common.&#160;Sarah Dorr,&#160;Birthe&#160;Einen&#160;and&#160;Louise Olsson&#160;argue&#160;that students and institutions &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/07/as-impact-is-increasingly-found-in-non-academic-careers-what-skills-do-phd-students-need-now/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/07/as-impact-is-increasingly-found-in-non-academic-careers-what-skills-do-phd-students-need-now/">As impact is increasingly found in non-academic careers what skills do PhD students need now? </a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/07/as-impact-is-increasingly-found-in-non-academic-careers-what-skills-do-phd-students-need-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56379</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can we humanise peer review? </title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/05/can-we-humanise-peer-review/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/05/can-we-humanise-peer-review/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mcclell2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Peer review faces&#160;critical&#160;challenges linked to rising submissions and a lack of&#160;human reviewers willing to take them on. Considering two experiments in open forms of peer review,&#160;Helen Kara&#160;and&#160;Jenni Guthrie&#160;make the case &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/05/can-we-humanise-peer-review/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/05/can-we-humanise-peer-review/">Can we humanise peer review? </a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/08/05/can-we-humanise-peer-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56365</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does scientific progress sound like?</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/29/what-does-scientific-progress-sound-like/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/29/what-does-scientific-progress-sound-like/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 10:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Data and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measuring Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bibliometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonification]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Data sonification offers a novel, auditory approach to exploring complex datasets and a valuable complement to traditional visual representations. Taking the widely discussed findings of research based on the Consolidation-Disruption &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/29/what-does-scientific-progress-sound-like/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/29/what-does-scientific-progress-sound-like/">What does scientific progress sound like?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/29/what-does-scientific-progress-sound-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56353</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Academia’s “whorephobia” undermines research on sex work</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/27/academias-whorephobia-undermines-research-on-sex-work/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/27/academias-whorephobia-undermines-research-on-sex-work/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Equity Diversity and Inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence for Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experts and Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSE comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participatory research]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sex workers are excluded from academic research on sex work, yet  there could be much to gain from integrating their expertise into academic research.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/27/academias-whorephobia-undermines-research-on-sex-work/">Academia’s “whorephobia” undermines research on sex work</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/27/academias-whorephobia-undermines-research-on-sex-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56340</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>When AI communicates research, who signs it off?</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/22/when-ai-communicates-research-who-signs-it-off/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/22/when-ai-communicates-research-who-signs-it-off/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Data and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence for Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experts and Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI research impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research translation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56314</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Artificial intelligence could help close the gap between research and real-world impact, but only if used for audience-specific translation rather than summarisation. Drawing on findings from their Innovate UK-funded project &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/22/when-ai-communicates-research-who-signs-it-off/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/22/when-ai-communicates-research-who-signs-it-off/">When AI communicates research, who signs it off?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/22/when-ai-communicates-research-who-signs-it-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56314</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>As AI writing proliferates academics should publish less</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/21/as-ai-writing-proliferates-academics-should-publish-less/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/21/as-ai-writing-proliferates-academics-should-publish-less/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 10:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI slop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AI tools have accelerated the production of academic writing to the point where quality control mechanisms and peer review are buckling under the weight of submissions. Muhammad Aamir Cheema argues &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/21/as-ai-writing-proliferates-academics-should-publish-less/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/21/as-ai-writing-proliferates-academics-should-publish-less/">As AI writing proliferates academics should publish less</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/21/as-ai-writing-proliferates-academics-should-publish-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56310</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
