With its headquarters and security operations command center (SOCC) in the heart of downtown Los Angeles, Elite “remained on high alert for its operations, personnel and their families, and its many local clients during the unprecedented fire tragedy,” according to the company announcement.

“Fortunately, our operations were not affected in any way,” says Elite security director Noel Delgado. “Our remote location was secure, and our team was able to remote monitor all properties with no interruption.

“Our [emergency action plan] protocol was on standby if anything should arise but ultimately it was not implemented,” he says.

How Elite Interactive Staff Helped During L.A. Wildfires

While some members of Elite’s executive team suffered devastating property losses in the wildfires, leadership “never wavered ensuring all the logistical, technological and psychological attention and support that staff and customers needed under the extraordinary circumstances was provided,” according to the company announcement.

“Preparedness, experience, expertise, execution and ongoing communications paid off to help Elite’s clients emerge relatively unscathed,” the announcement says.

“Elite reached out personally to clients in the designated fire zones and nearby areas by email distribution. We advised them that we would support any additional monitoring that they may need,” says Delgado. “No monitored sites were affected, although one client’s property came close.

“Our team immediately contacted her as SOCC operators were tracking the fire zones. Our client immediately contacted her staff and had her cars and belongings moved from the property. At the same time, our remote guarding remained online to prevent any looting on client properties,” he says.

Exceeding UL central station requirements, Elite’s subterranean SOCC and infrastructure has been designed to withstand practically any calamity or unexpected situation.

Located in a building that can withstand an 8.9 earthquake, the facility’s power supply is backed up by five diesel generators that can allow operations to be maintained for three months. The building is also home to the largest vault in the Western and fortified with advanced security.

Along with these building redundancies, Elite Interactive Solutions also has an Emergency Action Protocol (EAP) if the building shuts down due to unforeseen circumstances.

Ready for Anything

Elite Interactive constantly tracks all major emergencies across the nation to ensure client safety and property security. Thus, the SOCC keeps a close watch on news, social media and emergency applications that alert to situations like active shooters or other mass notification as well as natural threats.

SOCC personnel undergo a training curriculum that includes emergency protocols for incidents including earthquake, fire, bomb threat, active shooter, medical emergency, short-/long-term power loss, explosion or civil disturbance.

Should the need arise, Elite’s team is equipped with laptops to remotely monitor from anywhere.

“Unexpected circumstances can arise at any given moment. Being ready and always staying ready to implement emergency actions is key,” says Delgado. “Training is crucial and tracking rapidly evolving events will make sure our clients and their assets are secured.”

The post Elite Interactive Solutions Staffers Rise to Los Angeles’ Latest Wildfire Challenges appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

Before we dive any further into any aspect of that subject, please note that I have never been an operator, and I have little current knowledge about that side of the industry. However, I certainly read a lot about what is being developed — usually opinions of entrepreneurs in our industry today and what they will be using in the near future.

If you visit any commercial central station in the industry — any of them will do — you will find a fairly significant discussion among the people who own central stations, the people who manage central stations, the operators upon whom we depend, the technical people who keep them running and so forth.

A Unique Group of People

Monitoring center operators are a unique group of people. Most of them have recent certificates of completion of courses that they have successfully completed. Some of them come from standalone central stations; others come from a multilevel hierarchy.

I’m not smart enough to be able to identify or recognize what is a state-of-the-art monitoring facility. Is it composed of equipment? Is it composed of equipment and people? Is there any one technical protocol that is used by more than just a smattering of operators?

And that’s only the beginning of the questions. These queries are also worth asking: Is there a limitation on how many people central stations can absorb? How modern must the telephonic equipment be in order to be effective?

And finally, who will make the decisions on the kind of equipment to buy and how much is the buyer willing to pay for the equipment? It goes on and on.

Keep in mind that virtually any new application, any new equipment and virtually every decision that central station people will have to make will have ramifications, and they may have to live with those ramifications for many years to come.

It is likely that some manufacturers will be able to set up equipment and start operations in a very short period of time. Others, however, might have to wait for users to become totally knowledgeable about what their equipment is and can do.

Are You Ready for What’s Next in Monitoring Centers?

That invites a whole new series of questions: Is your company ready for equipment onboarding? How similar will the new equipment look as compared to the old equipment? How much will it cost? What does a checklist of all decisions that need to be made look like?

And those, my friends, are just a small handful of the questions that you will need to answer. As I understand it, the process that everyone will go through entails a huge allocation of time, money and human resources just to be able to do any kind of satisfactory job.

Every new element of building a standalone central station will require answering questions. The ones that I’ve laid out in this article are just a few. And I know for certain that every question has to be answered to get to the next question, and so forth.

Is your company ready to undertake such a large business effort? If the commitment is not solid, then the results will also not be solid. This will be one of the most complex projects any alarm business will have to absorb going forward.

Welcome to the future!

Click here to check out our central station monitoring guide!

The post Big Idea: What Does the Future Look Like for Monitoring Centers in 2025 and Beyond? appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

This edition is now available for purchase and review through the NFPA. In a series of articles, I will cover the changes that have been made from the 2022 edition to the 2025 edition.

Depending on the area in which you perform your fire alarm work, the 2025 edition may become effective this year; meanwhile, in other areas, it may a few years from now. The first adoption will most likely be with the United States federal government, which uses the most recent published standards.

As the 2025 edition is adopted, you should remember to check for any state or local amendments that may have been made.

A Number of New Definitions in NFPA 72

In this article, I will cover a number of new definitions that have been added, plus some changes that have been made to a few of the existing definitions. They are found in Chapter 3, Definitions.

3.3.31 Auxiliary Service Provider (ASP)

An entity or service that receives signals from a protected premises fire alarm system, modifies or manipulates the signals, and directs the signals to the supervising station and is positioned in the network topology such that signals cannot reach the supervising station without the entity or service. (SIG-SSS)

This definition was added to describe a means by which a third party is used to transmit the signals from a protected premises to the supervising station. This typically would be a cloud-based service in which there are now several providers of this service.

3.3.39 Carbon Monoxide Source

Equipment or a permanently installed appliance, fireplace or process used inside a building that produces or emits carbon monoxide gas. (SIG-IDS)

Although carbon monoxide alarms and detectors have been in the standard for several editions, there was not a definition as to the source of CO. This expands the assumed source to beyond fuel-burning appliances.

3.3.79 Detector

A device suitable for connection to a circuit that has a sensor that responds to a physical stimulus, such as gas, heat, light, sound or smoke. (SIG-IDS)

The definition for detector was changed to add the words “light” and “sound.” This was done so as to incorporate new methods of detection that have come into the market and that were not part of NFPA 72. These include the following:

3.3.79.1 Acoustic Leak Detector

A device that detects the presence of a gas leak through detection of the sound produced by a pressurized gas release. (SIG-IDS)

3.3.79.26 Thermal Image Fire Detector

An initiating device that senses overheated combustible material by imaging in the long-wave infrared wavelengths (i.e., far infrared) using a focal plane array. (SIG-IDS)

Definitions Were Added

With the publication of NFPA 715, Standard for the Installation of Fuel Gases Detection and Warning Equipment, the following definitions were added:

3.3.79.11 Fuel Gas Detector

A device having a sensor that responds to fuel gas that is connected to an alarm control unit. [715, 2023] (SIG-IDS)

3.3.132 Fuel Gas Warning Equipment

Any detector, alarm, device or material related to single- and multiple-station alarms or household fuel gas detection systems. [715, 2023] (SIG-IDS)

In addition, the technical committee on Household Systems added a new definition for Fuel-Burning Equipment to clarify that the fuel could be something other than a gas.

3.3.131 Fuel-Burning Equipment

Any device that burns solid, liquid or gaseous fuel or a combination thereof. (SIG-HOU)

A significate change was made to the definition for Managed Facilities-Based Voice Network.

3.3.172 Managed Facilities-Based Voice Network (MFVN)

A physical facilities-based network capable of transmitting real-time signals with formats unchanged that is managed, operated and maintained by the regulated communications carrier to ensure service quality and reliability from the subscriber location to the supervising station via the public-switched telephone network (PSTN) or interconnection points with other MFVN peer networks. (SIG-SSS)

In the past, the definition had only referenced the “service provider.” This change makes it clear that a MFVN must be maintained by a regulated communications carrier, and that the signal must be reliable from the protected premises to the supervising station.

3.3.190 Network Connectable Equipment

System components that connect to the internet or external systems through wired or wireless pathways using various protocols.

As the use of networks increase as a part of a fire alarm system, this definition was added to acknowledge that these can be hardwired or wireless.

‘Personnel’ Descriptions

Two new definitions were added to the “personnel” descriptions:

3.3.213.1 Authorized Personnel

The property owner, or designated representative appointed or selected by the property owner, who performs certain duties. (SIG-FUN)

3.3.213.2 Emergency Personnel

Person(s) who have been trained in emergency response. (SIG-FUN)

Finally, as cybersecurity gains a stronger foothold within NFPA 72, a definition for Cybersecurity Software was added.

3.3.293.3 Cybersecurity Software

Software that is included in a system element and arranged such that its inclusion or exclusion in no way affects the executive or site-specific software execution and whose purpose is to reduce the vulnerability of the system and/or equipment to cybersecurity attacks. (SIG-FUN)

The post Fireside Chat: Inside the Updated National Fire Alarm & Signaling Code (NFPA 72) appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

In addition, Randy Krause was reappointed to a second three-year term, Jeffrey Foisel’s appointment was extended for three years and Rodger Reiswig’s appointment was extended for one year. All appointments and re-appointments began Jan. 1, 2025.

More About New NFPA Standards Council Members

Colonna joined NFPA as an engineer and staff liaison after serving in the US Coast Guard for 12 years with assignments afloat and ashore. During his 34-year tenure at NFPA, he staffed committee projects responsible for documents on maritime fire protection and industrial and chemical hazards.

He also developed and instructed training programs for many of these topics and authored numerous technical papers and presentations. Colonna currently serves as a principal member of NFPA technical committees on hot work safe practices, confined space safe practices and classification and properties of hazardous chemical data.

He holds engineering degrees from the U.S. Coast Guard Academy and Stanford University and is a registered professional engineer in chemical engineering in Massachusetts. He holds professional memberships with NFPA, AICHE, ACS, ASSP, and SFPE.  Since retiring, Colonna has remained active as a consulting engineer with FSL Consulting LLC.

Grill is principal of Ray Grill Consulting PLLC. He is licensed as a fire protection and mechanical engineer in several states with more than 40 years of experience in fire protection engineering. Grill is a fellow and past president of the Society of Fire Protection Engineers.

He is also a lifetime member of NFPA and has served as a trustee of the Fire Protection Research Foundation. Grill currently chairs the Installation Technical Committee of NFPA 13, the Building Services and Fire Protection Equipment Technical Committees of NFPA 101 and 5000 and serves on the Notification Appliance and Emergency Communications Technical Committees of NFPA 72.

He is also an NFPA 72 instructor for NFPA.

LeBlanc is a staff vice president and senior engineering technical specialist within the chief engineers group at Factory Mutual (FM), where he has worked for 40 years.

He is responsible for the development and updating of FM’s property loss prevention data sheets on ignitable liquid handling/storage, aerosol products, explosion protection systems, and provides support to all the special hazard subject matter experts who handle combustible dust standards, flammable gas standards, hazardous chemical standards, and special protection systems.

LeBlanc received a Bachelor of Science in chemical engineering from Case Western Reserve University and a master of science in fire protection engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute. He serves on 15 NFPA committees, is a member of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and a fellow of the Society of Fire Protection Engineers.

What the Council Does

The NFPA Standards Council, appointed by the NFPA Board of Directors, is comprised of 13 members. The responsibilities of the Council include overseeing NFPA standards development activities, ensuring compliance with the NFPA Regulations and Rules, and serving as the appeals body over matters related to standards development.

The post NFPA Board of Directors Announces Standards Council Appointments appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

More About Josh Brackett

Brackett is the corporate regulatory director of facilities at Banner Health, where he leads efforts to reduce unnecessary life safety features and leverage innovative alternative compliance methods. As the co-founder of Legacy FM, Brackett “dedicates himself to empowering healthcare facilities teams through tailored education and training,” according to the NFPA announcement.

Brackett is pursuing a JD at Ohio Northern University Pettit College of Law, as he “aspires to influence federal policy, reform industry standards and drive national code reform,” the announcement says. He also engages with numerous ASHE, NFPA and ASHRAE committees, driving innovation and continuous improvement in healthcare facilities management.

Brackett began his career in fire protection design at a national engineering firm, gaining a foundation in codes and standards. This expertise fueled his contributions to the Sustainability and Regulatory Affairs Committees at the American Society for Health Care Engineering (ASHE), where he built a nationwide network.

Transitioning to a fire protection contracting company, he established regulatory processes and procedures for hospitals across Arkansas and neighboring states. At Baptist Health, Arkansas’ largest health care organization, he led initiatives in regulatory compliance, energy management and process improvement.

More About Kevin Sehlmeyer

Sehlmeyer, the Michigan State fire marshal and director of the Bureau of Fire Services, serves as the first vice president of the International Fire Marshals Association, member of the Vision 20/20 Advisory Council and member of the Firefighter Cancer Cohort Study advisory group.

He also represents the National Association of State Fire Marshals on the International Code Council Battery and Energy Storage Ad Hoc Committee.

Through these advisory roles and others, Sehlmeyer has gained insights into emerging trends and contributes to expanding community risk reduction (CRR) efforts, advocating for enhanced fire codes and promoting life safety.

With more than three decades of fire service leadership, Sehlmeyer has driven advancements in firefighter safety, health and wellness and emergency preparedness. A frequent keynote speaker at national and state conferences, he “continues to be a dedicated advocate for advancing firefighter safety while strengthening community resilience,” according to the NFPA announcement.

Sehlmeyer leads 94 employees at the Bureau of Fire Services and oversees MI Prevention, a nationally recognized statewide CRR program.

MI Prevention provides support and logistics for more than 700 fire departments and community organizations by offering guidance and engineered resources towards coordinated CRR initiatives. These efforts include fire and safety education and the distribution of smoke alarms and CO detectors for installation during home safety visits, all with the goal of promoting early warning, to foster a quicker escape from fires for Michigan’s 10 million residents.

Why FPRF Added Brackett and Sehlmeyer as Board Trustees

The Fire Protection Research Foundation is an independent, nongovernmental organization with its own officers and nine trustees. The FPRF Board of Trustees manages the overall business of the Foundation, including providing fiduciary oversight, and delivers input and guidance for strategic planning, research priorities, and future growth of the foundation.

The foundation plans and manages a few dozen projects at any given time and communicates findings in support of the NFPA mission. Over the last 40 years, FPRF research reports have been downloaded by safety-focused practitioners in more than 160 countries.

Projects cover everything from fire suppression systems, emergency response, public policy, public education and detection and signaling to industrial hazards, wildfire, electrical and building safety.

The post The Fire Protection Research Foundation Announces the Election of Two New Trustees appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

The addition of new IP Speakers, together with Zenitel Connect Pro—which the company claims is the industry’s first unified critical communication platform—is designed to unify communication technologies to address life safety, security, and operational communication needs under a single platform.

“Last year, with the introduction of Zenitel Connect Pro, we laid a robust foundation for the future of unified critical communication (UCC) offerings. At the beginning of this new year, we are happy to share the launch of a new IP speaker range, further strengthening our UCC offerings,” says Lars Paulsson, EVP for safety and security at Zenitel. “The launch of our new IP speaker range marks a significant step in expanding our UCC offerings. As the demand for audio communication solutions grows, we believe these IP speakers will redefine Security, Safety and Operational communication,” Paulsson adds.

New IP Speakers Deliver Advanced Safety Communications

Zenitel boasts its new IP speakers are built to produce high levels of sound quality through the use of a high-efficiency power amplifier and together the components delivers a high sound pressure levels (SPLs) to make the notification system a solution for high noise environments, in addition to its ability to cover larger areas with fewer speakers.

The European company points out that through the products’ ONVIF and SIP compatibility, Zenitel’s new IP speakers simplify the integration into security systems, opening new possibilities for communication. Together with Zenitel Connect Pro Zenitel continues, the new IP speaker range offers dealers range of unified communication possibilities that enable seamless communication with security personnel, control room operators, staff, and visitors.

Some of the applications the IP speakers can be used include public address, emergency notifications, security announcements, and background music.

Zenitel says that its latest product line produces up to 123dB of output, and the IP speakers feature dynamic power management that delivers a 30-watts output for voice applications even with standard PoE, eliminating the need for a PoE+ switch. In line with eco-design principles, Zenitel’s new loudspeakers are also designed to reduce idle power consumption to help lower energy costs for property owners.

The company adds the product line also integrates speaker-as-a-microphone technology to allow the IP speakers to become an important part of a unified critical communication solution by enabling seamless one-way and bi-directional communication without requiring additional equipment.

More news from Security Sales: Security Gives Back: SIA’s CEO Pounds Pavement to Help Young Security Talent

The post IP Speakers from Zenitel Complement Security and Notification Systems appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

The Susquenita School District comprises an elementary, middle, and high school, located on an 85-acre campus just off the Appalachian Trail. It educates approximately 1800 students from Marysville, Duncannon, and other townships each year.

According to the Gun Violence Research Center, 60.6% of the Pennsylvania K-12 gun violence incidents analyzed occurred outside the school.

ZeroEyes adds a layer of interior and exterior detection to the district’s security infrastructure that also includes a visitor management system, surveillance systems, controlled access points, and emergency protocols like threat assessment teams as well as relocation and reunification plans.

Why Susquenita Chose ZeroEyes AI Gun Detection

“A safe environment promotes excellence by reducing distractions and fostering an atmosphere conducive to learning, creativity, and personal growth while cultivating a sense of trust and belonging within the school community,” says Dr. Jon-David Fox, superintendent of Susquenita School District.

ZeroEyes’ AI gun detection and intelligent situational awareness software layers onto existing digital security cameras. If a gun is identified, images are instantly shared with the ZeroEyes Operations Center (ZOC), staffed 24/7/365 by specially trained U.S. military and law enforcement veterans.

If these experts determine that the threat is valid, they dispatch alerts and actionable intelligence — including visual description, gun type, and last known location — to local law enforcement and the district’s school resource officers as quickly as 3 to 5 seconds from detection.

“I commend Susquenita School District for their focus on security and safety, investing in the future of their students,” says Mike Lahiff, CEO and co-founder of ZeroEyes. “By adopting our proactive AI gun detection technology, the district has taken a significant step towards creating a secure learning environment for its students and staff.”

The post Susquenita School District Deploys AI Gun Detection and Situational Awareness appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

The acquisition of All Source expands RapidFire’s service offerings with the addition of All Source’s security services, as well as extinguisher and kitchen hood capabilities. This represents the second acquisition in Texas for RapidFire since its founding in March 2022.

RapidFire is, of course, the multi-regional “Buy & Build” experts for fire, life safety and security.

Chris and Amber Lee founded All Source in 2019, serving the Texas Hill Country and surrounding area. The company provides fire protection and security services. The company’s services include installation, test and inspection, design, repair and monitoring.

Following the close, All Source employees will continue to deliver the same services the company is known for and will be an integral part of the growth strategy for RapidFire in the Texas Hill Country.

All Source Joining Forces with RapidFire

All Source owner Chris Lee says joining forces with RapidFire represents a tremendous opportunity. He says it will “…[allow] us to combine our experience and dedication with their extensive resources, cutting-edge technology and broad expertise.”

Lee continues, “This partnership will enable us to deliver even greater benefits to our customers by expanding our services, while maintaining an unwavering commitment to safety and satisfaction.”

All Source emphasizes a customer-centric philosophy. Indeed, the company strives to understand the needs of its clients to ensure high-quality service. The company’s core values — accountability, consistency, honesty, integrity, safety knowledge and professionalism — guide every aspect of operations.

Moreover, according to All Source, the company believes that how business is conducted is just as important as the services provided.

RapidFire COO Brian Modglin expresses excitement about the All Source team joining RapidFire. “Their dedication to life safety and customer service further enhances our ability to provide best-in-class life safety services in the Texas marketplace,” he declares.

The post RapidFire Safety & Security Acquires All Source Fire Protection appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

As a security risk management professional, I’m often asked after incidents like these how public places—such as shopping centers, community gathering spots, or entertainment venues—can better protect themselves.

While it’s impossible to eliminate every threat, certain measures can reduce the chances of an incident or lessen its impact should one occur. Taking a risk-based approach to protecting public spaces helps implement the right solutions tailored to the unique needs of different locations and events.

Risk Profiles: One Size Does Not Fit All

Every location is unique. What works for a massive sports arena may not be practical for a small community theater.

To identify a specific site profile to address possible threats, and vulnerabilities, taking a “risk-based approach” helps to ensure that the security measures implemented are effective, sustainable, and appropriate to for a specific security budget.

1. Consider the venue: Is your venue a high-traffic spot in a major city, or a smaller location with fewer visitors? Are you near a major tourist attraction that draws crowds? Is the public profile of the location or event the topic of a potential news story if something tragic happens? All these factors influence how attractive a target the venue may be.
2. Understand the potential threats: Common high-impact threats include active shooters, vehicle-based attacks, explosives or bomb threats, and edged-weapon attacks.
3. Identify potential vulnerabilities: Are there large, open entrances that could be exploited? Do you have the ability to detect individuals carrying weapons? Are security protocols up to date? Is critical incident response plan well-drilled?

Considering these factors provides a clearer understanding of your risk profile and informs on the steps needed to help mitigate those risks.

As a risk management professional, I know that each unique risk profile requires tailored solutions. To provide the most effective strategies, I reached out to experts with deep knowledge in threat detection and mitigation.

Expert Insights: Monitoring, Assessing, and Mitigating Threats

Glen Kucera, president of Allied Universal Enhanced Protective Services, emphasizes the importance of intelligence analysis – understanding what people are saying about your venue or event.

“One of the keys to proactive threat management is monitoring open-source intelligence, from mainstream social media channels to chatter on the dark web,” he says. “Knowing what’s being discussed about your location, event, or even your organization’s leadership can help identify potential risks before they escalate.”

Modern security extends well beyond physical defenses. By analyzing information from social media, public forums, and dark web sources—within legal and ethical boundaries—organizations can better detect suspicious activity early, escalate concerns as needed, and make better-informed decisions about protective measures.

Threat Assessment and De-escalation in Public Spaces

Next, I spoke with Hugh O’Rourke, a risk management expert at Allied Universal, identifies early warning signs—often revealed through social media leaks or noticeable changes in behavior—and what happens once a potential threat is identified.

“Violence rarely happens in a vacuum,” he says. “Most attackers display warning signs—grievances, unusual behavior, or direct threats. A vigilant approach to monitoring these signs helps you to assess threats as you find them.

“Threat assessments are about asking two key questions: Is there a real danger? And if so, how can we mitigate it? Often, early intervention and respectful engagement can help defuse tensions before they escalate,” says O’Rourke.

Direct outreach and offering help also can be remarkably effective in protecting public spaces, particularly for someone in crisis or feeling unheard. In more serious cases, law enforcement involvement may be necessary. A formal process and well-defined team helps organizations  respond swiftly and responsibly to emerging threats.

Physical Security Measures for Public Spaces

No discussion about violence mitigation is complete without addressing physical security. Ty Richmond, president of event services at Allied Universal, outlines strategies for protecting against mass violence—such as vehicle rammings, stabbings, or shootings at large events and venues.

“Physical security isn’t just about walls and gates,” he says. “It’s about layering your defenses. A well-protected location combines technology, training, and tactical planning to help minimize vulnerabilities.”

Richmond highlights several key physical security tactics his team considers when planning event security:

• Perimeter protection – For example, using vehicle or other hardened barriers or fencing to deter unauthorized entry.
• Access control and screening – Such as installing metal detectors, bag checks, or canine teams for higher-risk events.
• Surveillance and monitoring – For example, positioning cameras with real-time analytics to detect suspicious behavior.
• Emergency response and evacuation – Such as developing lockdown procedures and well-practiced evacuation routes.
• Staff training and drills – For instance, conducting scenario-based exercises to help ensure everyone knows their role in a crisis.

“These considerations are essential for creating layers of defense that can deter attackers and help staff respond effectively if a threat materializes,” says Richmond. “Even small enhancements can make a real difference in keeping people safe.”

Putting It All Together

From my experience and the insights of these experts, several key takeaways stand out:

• Know your venue: Understand your location’s unique characteristics and tailor security accordingly.
• Monitor for signs: Use social media and community input as early detection systems.

• Assess and address: Implement a threat assessment process to help evaluate and mitigate risks.
• Strengthen physical security: Use layered defenses to reduce vulnerabilities.
• Empower individuals: Train staff and provide the public with clear guidance on responding to incidents.

While no strategy is foolproof, a thoughtful, risk-based approach—combined with expert insights—helps create safer environments for everyone.

Rachelle Loyear is vice president of integrated security solutions for Allied Universal.

The post Keeping Public Spaces Safe: A Risk-Based Perspective for Integrators to Consider appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

In addition to publishing insights from integrators and consultants who are enjoying success deploying these systems, we are surveying the broad integration community. Thus, we will be able to analyze the ripeness of mass notification-related opportunities versus other integrator focus areas.

Take Our Mass Notification Deep Dive Survey!

Please participate in our efforts to understand and report on mass notification by participating in our quick survey! Take the survey now and make sure your voice is heard!

The CI+SSI Mass Notification Deep Dive survey explores all aspects of how organizations like yours specify, deploy, service and profit from systems of this sort. Exploration areas include the following:

• How much revenue is derived from designing, deploying and maintaining these systems
• Which vertical markets show the greatest appetite for these deployments
• The types of systems (e.g., installed speakers, overhead paging, panic buttons, sirens) your clients currently use
• Which analytics capabilities are most valuable in these deployments

There are also two open-answer questions at the end of the survey, giving respondents like you an opportunity to speak in more detail about how you utilize mass notification technology to support your clients. Those open-answer questions are as follows:

• Share one of the biggest successes that a client of yours has experienced as a result of having the systems you designed and deployed.
• Share one of the biggest challenges that relates to how your clients utilize (or don’t utilize) their systems, as well as how outcomes could be improved.

Our survey only takes a few moments to complete, so please add your voice now! Take the survey and help shape CI+SSI’s most ambitious coverage of the mass notification category for the entire year.

To read more of our coverage of mass notification-related topics, check out our website archives.

The post SSI Set to Explore Mass Notification Category — Take Our Survey! appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

Winds don’t necessarily cause wildfires, say NFPA experts, but wind-driven wildfire can happen just about anywhere. High winds exacerbate the risk because they add oxygen to the fire, which increases its intensity, and helps to move fire very rapidly through vegetation. They also loft embers for a mile or more ahead of the fire front.

“We can’t control the wind, but we can modify fuels, whether those are grasses, shrubs, forests, or our homes and their immediate surroundings,” says Michele Steinberg, director of the NFPA wildfire division, in the association announcement.

“That’s where efforts to prepare homes and neighborhoods in advance can make a substantive difference in reducing their susceptibility to wildfire.”

More Wildfire Information from NFPA

According to the latest national NFPA data:

• There are more than 45 million homes in the wildland/urban interface (WUI), areas that are at high risk from destruction by wildfires. These statistics underscore that the U.S. is facing a wildfire crisis.
• Between 2014-2023, wildfires have destroyed more than 80,000 structures in the U.S., the majority of which were homes. Record high temperatures, drought conditions, and high winds from severe weather events have been blamed for increased wildfire activity in high-risk areas in the U.S., Canada and Europe.

Among the NFPA experts on wildfire-related issues are:

• Michele Steinberg, director of the wildfire division at NFPA, who oversees national policy, development regulations, and community safety, and supports wildfire-related projects that cover a broad spectrum of safety education, advocacy, training, and certification.
• Megan Fitzgerald-McGowan, program specialist and former wildland firefighter, who is responsible for the management of the Firewise USA recognition program.
• Curt Floyd, senior specialist and technical lead for Engineering Technical Services at NFPA, who oversees NFPA standards that address the needs of the fire service and emergency responders.

NFPA also offers Outthink Wildfire, a comprehensive strategy that “lays out five key policy changes that need to be made at the federal, state and local levels and, if followed, will end the destruction of communities by wildfire over the next 30 years.”

The post NFPA Offers Resources and Information Related to Southern California Wildfires appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

“As much as we all enjoy the look and feel of Christmas trees in our homes, they’re large combustible items that have the potential to result in serious fires,” says Lorraine Carli, vice president of outreach and advocacy at NFPA in the association announcement.

Christmas tree fires don’t happen often, according to NFPA data, but when they do, they’re more likely to be serious. That’s in part because fresh Christmas trees dry out over time, making them more flammable the longer they’re in the home, the association announcement says.

A dried-out Christmas tree will burn much more quickly than a well-watered one, says NFPA.

How Christmas Tree Fires Happen

Between 2018 and 2022, there was an estimated annual average of 155 home structure fires that began with Christmas trees, resulting in four civilian deaths, seven civilian injuries, and $15 million in direct property damage.

“Fires that begin with Christmas trees represent a very small but notable part of the U.S. fire problem, considering that they are generally in use for a short time each year,” says Carli in the NFPA announcement.

To safely dispose of a Christmas tree, NFPA recommends using the local community’s recycling program, if possible; trees should not be put in the garage or left outside. NFPA also offers these tips for safely removing lighting and decorations to ensure that they remain in good condition:

• Use the gripping area on the plug when unplugging electrical decorations. Never pull the cord to unplug any device from an electrical outlet, as this can harm the wire and insulation of the cord, increasing the risk for shock or electrical fire.
• As you pack up light strings, inspect each line for damage, throwing out any sets that have loose connections, broken sockets or cracked or bare wires.
• Wrap each set of lights and put them in individual plastic bags or wrap them around a piece of cardboard.
• Store electrical decorations in a dry place away from children and pets where they will not be damaged by water or dampness.

The post NFPA Warns More Than One-Third of Christmas Tree Home Fires Occur in January appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

The survey by SSI’s sister site also found that, of the participants whose campuses don’t have a security camera system on campus, about half said they were considering purchasing one in the next two years.

As the rapid adoption of these systems continues to grow, so do their capabilities. Ongoing advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning help campuses analyze video footage in real time to detect objects, identify people, and analyze behavior, saving law enforcement and practitioners hours of scouring through footage.

While its sometimes hard to imagine how video surveillance technology can advance even more, campus security experts and practitioners who use these systems day in and day out know this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Below are some predictions from practitioners, consultants, and solutions providers about the future of campus video surveillance as we head into the new year.

Education and Healthcare Video Surveillance Predictions

Mark Reed, MBA, CHPA, director of campus support operations for City of Hope:

“AI-driven video analytics will increasingly be incorporated to monitor patient behavior, detect falls, and identify potential safety issues in real time. AI-enhanced cameras can notify healthcare workers instantly if a patient requires assistance, especially in high-risk areas like ICUs and emergency departments. With the rise in incidents at healthcare facilities, video surveillance will be crucial for bolstering facility security. Intelligent video systems will assist in detecting unauthorized access and alerting staff to potential threats, enabling quicker responses during emergencies. Wearable cameras for healthcare workers are likely to gain traction, providing an added layer of accountability and security in patient interactions. These cameras can serve both as training tools and as documentation for patient care, improving transparency and quality control.”

Jeffrey Yarbrough, Chief of Police, Hutto Police Department, CEO, The Veridical Consulting Group, 2021 Campus Safety Director of the Year finalist:

“In 2025, AI-driven video surveillance systems will redefine safety and security in K-12 schools. These systems will equip school-based law enforcement and campus security teams with AI technology, transitioning from a traditional reactive posture to a next generation intelligent and preventive response to a variety of situations.

“AI-driven surveillance systems will activate automatically in response to contextual events and provide instant notification, remote viewing, and real-time tracking. For instance, unauthorized door openings will prompt the system to isolate the entryway and use facial recognition to cross-reference integrated student or staff ID systems and public databases. Similarly, when a fire alarm pull station is activated, AI will pinpoint the location, activate area cameras, and track involved individuals to deliver real-time insights to campus security. The next generation technology will provide behavioral cluster detection to analyze crowd dynamics and identify high-risk gatherings in areas prone to unauthorized activity. If unusual clusters form, the system will notify security personnel, overlay profiles of those involved for swift identification, and track movements to facilitate timely interventions and de-escalation.

“Advanced geofencing technology will use AI to establish virtual boundaries around restricted zones or vehicle-prohibited areas. Breaches will trigger automated video surveillance tracking and provide responders with precise real-time data. Another powerful feature will be video surveillance controlled advanced AI geofencing. Systems will use geospatial technology to create digital boundaries around predesignated areas. If breached, AI driven video surveillance systems will automatically track individuals or vehicles in real time and provide precise details on location, direction, and entry points to responders. The system will issue AI generated automated alerts over multiple platforms to keep entire campuses informed.

“Predictive and preventive analytics will further enhance K-12 school campus security. By analyzing historical data, AI driven video surveillance systems will detect anomalies such as students accessing restricted areas at odd hours or deviations from routine traffic patterns in sensitive zones. Advanced features like 360-degree panoramic views and body language recognition will be used to detect signs of distress, aggression, or concealed weapons for unparalleled situational awareness.

“2025 will bring game changing AI-driven video surveillance technology to K-12 schools. The technology will mitigate active shooter events, reduce violence, deter crime, and create secure, nurturing environments for students and staff. The technology will emerge as the new standard for safety in education and provide unparalleled peace of mind to school communities.”

Danielle Stevens, director of safety and security, Lake Zurich Community Unit School District 95, 2023 Campus Safety Director of the Year winner:

“In 2025, I predict that schools will prioritize comprehensive audits of their video surveillance systems to address evolving safety needs. These audits will focus on assessing coverage, identifying gaps, and integrating surveillance strategies into long-term planning.

“Strategic camera additions, including the potential use of AI tools such as weapons detection systems, may also be considered. Collaboration will be key to optimizing these systems. Partnering with local first responders can provide valuable insights into camera placement and integration with emergency response needs. Cross-departmental collaboration with Facilities and IT will also play a crucial role. For example, when new spaces are built or renovated, it is essential to reassess camera placement to address blind spots and enhance overall coverage. Standardizing camera systems will create consistency and cost-effectiveness over time.

“Establishing a strong maintenance and replacement plan, if not already in place, will be critical for maintaining system reliability and supporting long-term budget planning. Adding advanced AI tools, such as weapons detection, requires planning. Schools need to assess whether their current camera infrastructure can support these technologies, as upgrades may involve significant and sometimes unexpected expenses.

“Additionally, it is important to evaluate how these tools align with broader safety and security plans. While immediate implementation may not be feasible, incorporating these technologies into long-term budgets and strategies will prepare schools for future enhancements.

“Lastly, training staff is just as important as the technology itself. School administrators should focus on ongoing professional development to equip staff with the skills needed to respond to alerts in real-time and fully utilize the systems’ capabilities. By combining strategic audits, collaboration, long-term planning, and professional development, schools can develop robust, adaptable surveillance systems. These efforts will enhance situational awareness, strengthen safety strategies, and provide a solid foundation for meeting the evolving needs of school communities.”

Ian Lopez, director of security, Cherry Creek School District, 2024 Campus Safety Director of the Year finalist:

“School districts will continue to search for video surveillance solutions that bring both facility and school bus footage together under one platform, that can provide analytics and detection capabilities that will ultimately provide for more accurate and efficient deterrent, response, and forensic capabilities.

“The systems must support day-to-day operations, as well as large scale emergencies, so they can be used to mitigate problems before they happen as well as enhance real-time situational awareness during school-based emergencies.”

Video Surveillance Predictions from Security Consultants

Dan Dusseau, owner, Dusseau Solutions LLC, retired chief of police/director of public safety, Northern Virginia Community College Police Department, 2014 Campus Safety Director of the Year winner:

“Advances in AI-powered surveillance and threat detection are set to significantly improve safety in schools, creating environments where students, staff, and parents can feel more secure. Currently, video surveillance primarily serves a reactive function, reviewing incidents after they occur. However, the shift toward real-time monitoring will transform these systems into proactive tools that identify threats like weapons, unauthorized access, or abnormal behavior before issues escalate. This immediate detection capability provides school communities with peace of mind, knowing potential dangers can be intercepted swiftly.

“Beyond security, AI systems will streamline routine tasks, such as attendance and visitor tracking. By using facial recognition and behavior analysis, these systems will automatically verify who is on campus, reducing the need for manual ID checks or sign-ins. School staff will have a clear, real-time understanding of who is present and where, enhancing control over campus access. This level of oversight can reassure parents and staff, knowing that only authorized individuals have access to school grounds.

“Emergency response will also improve, as integrated security technologies enable swift lockdowns, remote door locking, and real-time population tracking in the event of an evacuation. These capabilities provide a clear overview of everyone’s location, allowing for faster, more efficient responses that reduce risks during critical moments. Students, staff, and parents can feel confident that, if an emergency arises, response systems are well-prepared to protect them.

“While privacy concerns around facial recognition may initially create hesitancy, evolving regulations and safeguards will address these issues, balancing safety with privacy rights. Although new threats like deep fakes could potentially challenge the reliability of AI systems, schools will also need to develop countermeasures and policies to safeguard students, staff and faculty and accompanying data.

“Overall, these technologies will enhance not only the actual safety of school environments but also the perception of security. With the assurance that potential threats are identified early, administrative processes are simplified, and emergency responses are well-coordinated, school communities will feel a renewed sense of security, fostering peace of mind for students, staff, and parents alike.”

Paul Sarnese, owner, Secured & Prepared Consulting, past IAHSS president, 2022 Campus Safety Director of the Year winner:

“I believe that security leaders will continue to embrace the use of analytics to identify risks and to solve safety, security, emergency management and operational issues. For example, I always tell the story of how I used my VMS to improve hospital operations. When I was responsible for hospital operations, I would log onto my VMS from home to view the parking lots and sidewalks of my employer to determine when I was going to deploy snow removal services. I also used the cameras to count occupants to determine the busy times in our cafeteria to determine when we needed to add an additional cashier during peak serving times. Today’s analytics can prevent injuries to staff and patients. Cameras can detect if a contractor is wearing a hard hat at a construction site and can prevent a patient from falling out of bed and prevent drug diversion. The analytics will continue to improve and provide valuable data, prevent injuries, and prevent operational inefficiencies. I truly believe that the analytics will help leaders solve safety, security and operational issues.

“In 2025, I believe that all new constructions and renovations will include cameras in the patient rooms allowing the clinical team to monitor patient activity, to directly communicate with the patients, to prevent patient falls, and to provide remote oversight of emergency responses to medical emergencies. Cameras will continue to integrate into the daily clinical management of a patient and will be included in the electronic medical records. The use of artificial intelligence will continue to assist leaders in identifying safety, security, emergency management, and operational risks and provide a solution to taking action to mitigate the risks. I am extremely excited to help my clients to utilize cameras and their VMS to improve staff and patient safety, security and operations.”

Video Surveillance Predictions from Solutions Providers

Brad Cary, business development manager for education, Milestone Systems:

“As educational institutions face evolving security challenges, 2025 will mark a significant shift toward cloud-based video security solutions. The convergence of robust data infrastructure, advanced analytics, and cost-effective storage options is transforming how schools approach safety and security.

“The migration to cloud-based security solutions isn’t just a trend – it’s becoming a necessity. Schools are discovering that cloud strategies offer unprecedented flexibility while reducing infrastructure costs. Several key developments are driving this transformation:

• Hybrid solutions take center stage. The traditional model of on-premises video security systems is giving way to hybrid approaches that combine local and cloud resources. This strategy allows institutions to maintain critical on-site capabilities while leveraging the scalability and cost benefits of cloud storage. With tiered as-needed video storage pricing models, as with AWS, for example, schools can preserve existing investments while gradually and affordably transitioning to more cloud-based services.
• Pay-as-you-go flexibility. Financial pressures are pushing educational institutions toward more flexible payment models. Cloud-based Video Security as a Service (VSaaS) solutions are gaining traction by eliminating large upfront capital expenditures. This approach allows schools to scale their security infrastructure based on actual needs rather than projected future requirements.
• Enhanced data sharing capabilities. Cloud connectivity is revolutionizing how security teams collaborate with first responders. The ability to instantly share video data during emergencies is becoming a critical feature, enabling faster and more coordinated responses to security incidents. Cloud platforms facilitate secure, rapid sharing of video information with law enforcement and emergency services.
• Analytics-driven security. The integration of cloud services with open platform video management systems (VMS) is enabling more sophisticated analytics. Again, advanced AWS tools in this area are making it possible to process vast amounts of video data more efficiently, helping schools identify potential security threats before they escalate. This proactive approach to campus security is becoming increasingly important as institutions face more complex security challenges.
• Infrastructure simplification. The reduction in on-premises infrastructure requirements is proving particularly attractive to resource-constrained institutions. Cloud-based solutions eliminate the need for extensive server rooms and complex maintenance schedules, allowing IT staff to focus on more strategic initiatives.

“As we move through 2025, these trends will continue to reshape campus security. The combination of cloud storage, advanced analytics, and flexible deployment options is creating more efficient and effective security solutions for educational institutions of all sizes.”

Craig Oberschlake, business development manager – education, Bosch Security and Safety Systems:

“AI will continue to enhance the effectiveness of video surveillance in 2025. It is tipping the value proposition of video surveillance toward delivering visual intelligence that enables proactive responses. It can help campus safety departments move toward a predictive approach to security with alerts to activity that indicates a security risk and detections of unsafe conditions or other critical situations before they become a problem.

“Edge-based intelligence can help schools and universities detect brandished guns, identify vehicle license plates and make and model information for better parking management, recognize individuals’ physical characteristics for swift and accurate forensic investigations, and much more. AI analytics designed for specific solutions and applications allows for greater accuracy and customization, as well as increased granularity for more specific forensic searches when a suspicious person or vehicle is on campus, or an event has already occurred.

“When integrated with other security and communications technologies, these intelligent solutions help K-12 schools and higher education facilities mitigate risks, automate deterrence tactics, and increase operational efficiency while preserving a welcoming atmosphere that is essential to student and staff performance. Using technology-based solutions to enhance the feeling of safety among the school and campus community can help administrators strengthen student, instructor, and staff outcomes.”

Mike Rose, vice president of sales, IDIS Americas:

“In 2025, video surveillance in K-12 schools will evolve into a smarter, more strategic tool, powered by advancements in AI and analytics. These technologies are no longer merely about capturing footage—they’re transforming how schools proactively manage safety, security, and even student wellness.

“Expect to see schools leveraging intelligent video management systems (VMS) to identify potential risks in real time, from unusual behaviors to overcrowded hallways. Advanced analytics like behavioral tracking and heatmapping will help schools take a proactive approach to both safety challenges and student support, creating environments that are as secure as they are nurturing.

“Integration and scalability are also critical to modernizing school surveillance systems. Today’s VMS solutions ensure seamless compatibility with a range of security devices, allowing districts to tailor systems to their needs without overhauling existing infrastructure. Scalable platforms provide schools with cost-effective ways to expand surveillance as campuses grow, all while minimizing complexity and reducing the total cost of ownership (TCO).

“With greater connectivity comes a new set of challenges—cybersecurity is top of mind. Schools need VMS platforms built to defend against threats like ransomware and data breaches, with essentials like strong encryption, automated updates, and multi-factor authentication.

“The future lies in smart, adaptable systems. By combining advanced AI with intuitive design and seamless integration, schools can address today’s safety concerns and anticipate tomorrow’s needs. It’s about creating solutions that evolve alongside their priorities, from security to student wellness.”

Jill Renihan, segment development manager, education, Axis Communications:

“First off, it’s important to remember that video surveillance is just one part of a comprehensive school security program, albeit an important one. Schools require a multi-layered approach to security that includes other technologies as well as dedicated people and processes. Accordingly, 2025 will bring an increase in safety requirements that schools must meet to be compliant with legislative demands. This is nothing new, but how schools meet these requirements will likely include a greater reliance on technology than ever before—especially if schools are to meet the spirit, and not just the letter, of the law.

“For example, states are passing mandates that require all exterior and classroom doors to be locked or monitored while students are present. While simply locking the door meets the letter of the law, the true spirit of the law is to ensure that unauthorized persons do not access campus or classrooms at any time—most importantly when students are present. AI in the form of video analytics can assist with this important task. Consider that a camera can be used to monitor a perimeter door, but if that camera feed is not actively monitored, a person approaching the door might go unnoticed. Through the assistance of analytics, when a person approaches the door, a camera can trigger several actions on the part of the system:

1. An SMS message, with a screen capture of the individual at the door, can be sent to security personnel;
2. A recorded announcement can notify the individual that they’re not authorized to enter and instruct them to proceed to the main office for visitor check-in;
3. If the individual persists, a siren could be initiated as well as a call to law enforcement for additional response.

“Expect to see further developments in the application of analytics to video. Audio analytics will also have a stronger presence on school campuses particularly in those locations in which cameras are disallowed, e.g., restrooms and locker rooms. Audio monitoring and analytics can initiate alerts in response to events like a call for help, threatening behavior and other similar incidents. These notifications can alert security and administrative staff to the need for investigation and intervention.

“As scrutiny and accountability continue to rise, there is an increasing demand for accurate, timely information about what happened, where events occurred and who did what to whom. In that vein, body worn devices will see increased adoption in schools in 2025.”

Chancy Pray, national vertical accounts manager, SLED/Fed/Data Centers, Honeywell:

“After more than 30 years in the security industry, the reoccurring lesson is that you never know it all and you can never stop learning. Working with the Honeywell Enterprise Security Team for the last 5 years has given me greater perspective on not only the Honeywell Security Solutions, but also on many of the incredible supporting integrations we work with.

“The future of campus and school security lies at the intersection of advanced technologies and human-centered strategies. AI and video analytics will provide real-time insights, mental health monitoring will offer early warning systems, and timely information sharing with first responders and school resource officers will ensure rapid responses. However, technology alone is not enough. Protecting our most valuable assets—our children—requires a comprehensive approach that integrates these tools with compassionate leadership, community involvement, and a strong emphasis on prevention and mental well-being.

“Upcoming grants, government funding, and state/local funded assistance in school security suggest a growing focus on advanced technology, including video surveillance and access control systems, alongside broader safety measures.

“Looking ahead to 2025, it is likely that funding for school safety will continue to rise, driven by public demand and legislative action. Schools will need to collaborate effectively, leverage data to showcase their needs, and invest in both technology and training to maximize the impact of these resources.”

Bruce Canal, executive lead, education, Genetec:

“As K-12 schools, colleges, and healthcare facilities become more strategic in how they approach and implement cloud solutions in their environment, decision-makers will prioritize hybrid systems. They’ll look for the best ways to centrally monitor remote sites from an on-premises head-end system and reduce on-site maintenance work with lightweight, quick-deploy hybrid cloud systems. They’ll want to modernize their video or access control systems without scrapping their existing tech investments. Those with deployments fully in the cloud may also want to optimize data processing and storage costs or facilitate broader third-party integrations using on-premises infrastructure.

“Software-as-a-service (SaaS) solutions that are open, unified, and support hybrid-cloud environments will offer the most flexible path forward. Beyond adopting flexible deployment models, organizations will be able to combine video, access control, intrusion, intercom, and other sensors from a variety of manufacturers. They can also connect existing infrastructure so that they become available via the cloud and install new devices at their own pace. Cloud-managed appliances will be key for organizations that want to bring their existing hardware to the cloud. They’ll save time on deploying systems and save on the costs of changing non-compatible cameras or access control hardware – making the transition to the cloud easier.”

Paul Dubois, business development manager, education, Hanwha Vision:

“Schools are being built or retrofitted continually, and security is at the top of every school board’s priority list. Driven by heightened risk levels, it is incumbent on administrators to maintain high levels of situational awareness at all times across buildings, campuses, and school districts. The video surveillance market will continue to thrive in the education vertical. We’ll continue to see cloud-based video solutions gaining traction in education and also more schools will increase their use of AI analytics to gather data more effectively and gain new insights into every aspect of their daily operations.”

The post 2025 Video Surveillance Predictions for Education and Healthcare Markets appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

The data extracted from these annual surveys offers insights into how campuses are using these technologies and the challenges and successes they encounter.

With the recent rise in mass shootings in America, many schools, institutions of higher education and healthcare facilities have adopted various types of technologies to screen for guns, knives, bombs, and other objects that could be used as weapons.

Results from our 2024 Weapons, Metal, and Gunshot Detection Survey, released in June, show the most popular type of weapons detection system used by survey participants is weapons/metal detection via walk-through or hand-held detectors (63%). An additional 11% said their organizations own, borrow, or rent a gunshot detection system.

While this data has proven extremely useful for gauging the adoption of these technologies, campus safety and security experts are often looking to the future, working diligently to continuously find ways to further mitigate violent incidents.

That’s why we asked a variety of experts — both practitioners and security solutions providers — to give their educated predictions for how weapons and gunshot detection in education and healthcare will evolve in 2025.

Weapons Detection Predictions from Safety/Security Practitioners

Anthony Pluretti, associate vice president, student & campus services, Widener University, 2022 Campus Safety Director of the Year winner:

“My prediction for the next couple of years is that you will see a huge influx of two technologies that are already gaining traction in the below markets. NFC wallet credentials, and concealed weapon detection systems. There are hundreds of K-12, higher ed, and healthcare systems utilizing technology such as the Evolv concealed weapons detection systems to screen students and the public when entering their facilities. As this technology continues to gain traction, it may become as common as cameras and card readers for schools and hospitals.

“NFC/mobile wallet credentials are still in their infancy but quickly spreading through the market. As they become easier and more cost effective to adopt, it will cause a precipitous shift in the market to deploy these to enhance both the student and faculty experience.  Magnetic and proximity cards are flawed in their security efficacy. As multi-factor authentication options such as mobile credentials and facial authentication readers stabilize in the market, they will become the new base standard for access control.”

Mark Reed, MBA, CHPA, director of campus support operations for City of Hope:

“AI-driven weapons detection systems are expected to become more common in healthcare settings, especially at main entry points and high-traffic areas. The State of California has recently passed legislation mandating weapons detection use at main entrances, emergency room entrances, and separate labor and delivery entrances. Healthcare facilities are likely to integrate weapons detection capabilities with existing video surveillance systems to create a comprehensive security network. This combination enables security teams to monitor and manage potential threats across various areas in real-time, making response coordination easier and more effective. Predictive analytics using data from weapons detection systems may help identify high-risk times or locations within a healthcare facility. By analyzing patterns in threat alerts, facilities can develop preemptive security measures, schedule additional personnel, or improve protocols at identified risk points.”

Ian Lopez, Director of Security, Cherry Creek School District, 2024 Campus Safety Director of the Year finalist:

“School districts will continue to weigh the benefit of weapons detection systems since many require additional support and manpower that schools often don’t have. Many schools still operate on open campus models with multiple entry points and don’t have the budgets or staff to support screening capabilities.

“Video detection systems must also be vetted to determine if the systems can perform as advertised and provide the necessary warnings needed to safeguard schools against real threats and false alarms.”

Dr. Aaron Skrbin, director of safety and security, Allegheny Intermediate Unit, 2024 Campus Safety Director of the Year finalist: 

“The use of AI continues unabated throughout all aspects of society. As this technology continues to permeate K-12 schools, the continued evolution of AI gun detection will continue. With each incident of school violence, officials continue to seek out ‘the better mousetrap’ to add to their array of safety and security tools. AI gun detection technology is one of the newer tools that the industry touts as having great benefit to schools, particularly in cases where camera systems are not actively monitored.

“As these systems evolve, they grow more sophisticated. In this way, schools may see more utility in the product in that it will identify not only guns, but potentially other weapons or hazards such as knives, vapes, etc. More schools may then move to adopt the products once they demonstrate greater day-to-day usage as opposed to a sole focus on weapons detection. The software also then eases the burden of school staff, many of whom may be tasked with searching students’ bags. Many school staff are untrained and uncomfortable with this process for a variety of reasons. In some cases, collective bargaining agreements prohibit school staff from participating in daily screening searches. In this way, AI weapons detection systems provide an additional layer of security over other systems.

“What remains clear however, is that no technology replaces the human element. While it is important to research, understand and invest in appropriate and proven security technology, the value of the technology is ultimately defined by the person on the receiving end of the information. Are those with access to the platform(s) capable of appropriately analyzing, interpreting and responding to the information that they receive? More importantly, above any physical tool, does your safety and security plan prioritize relationships above everything else. It is easy to get lost in the weeds of the ‘stuff’ but education is and always will be a human centered endeavor. We, as school safety professionals, must never lose site of the importance of making sure that students feel connected to their schools and have at least one appropriate and meaningful relationship with a trusted adult. No AI platform can ever replace the value of these relationships.”

Security Consultants Look to the Future

Mike Gips, principal, Global Insights in Professional Security:

“As both a security practitioner and an attorney, I’ve been observing and documenting the evolving role of weapons detection systems (WDSs) as part of a holistic security program that withstands legal claims alleging premises liability or negligent security. WDSs are increasingly becoming part of the standard of care in facilities such as medical centers, schools, and college campuses. As more and more sites opt for such systems, the expectation grows for similar or neighboring facilities to adopt these solutions. Moreover, it’s likely that the heightened capabilities of WDSs will also inform the evolving standard of care. WDSs are far more than metal detectors, incorporating elements such as visual cameras, thermal cameras, LiDAR, artificial intelligence, and other technologies. Outdated tools might not meet new standards of care, as determined by the courts.

“State legislation is also driving the increase in standard of care. At the beginning of 2024, Maryland began requiring the use of WDSs in hospitals, and medical institutions in California will have to follow suit by 2027. Other states will watch carefully to determine whether they should do likewise. But it won’t be surprising if a Maryland-based health institution decides to install WDSs in facilities located in other states as part of sound practice or in expectation of future legislation. In other words, the effect of these statutes may spread well beyond the states that enacted them.

“It’s essential to note, though, that even institutions that deploy WDSs with the latest bells and whistles aren’t automatically insulated from liability. Systems must be appropriately set up, tested, situated, maintained, calibrated, and staffed. A top-of-the-line WDS is a lot less valuable when an attendant lets certain people skirt screening or when there is not a well-thought-out process for what occurs when weapons are identified. While WDSs are only one (typically optional) element of a campus security program, organizations will be expected to assess these solutions, determine whether and where they are needed, and, if used, deploy them appropriately and effectively.”

Paul Sarnese, owner, Secured & Prepared Consulting, past IAHSS President, 2022 Campus Safety Director of the Year winner:

“Weapon Detection Systems will improve due to the use of artificial intelligence algorithms by continuing to learn to identify new threats. Systems will improve in their ability to detect stainless steel and ceramic items. The data that will be generated from the weapon detection system will become more granular and provide valuable insights into the threat environment and how best to deploy security resources.

“California is implementing AB 2795 which requires hospitals to implement a weapons detection screening policy by the year 2027. The statute will require the use of weapons detection devices that automatically screen a person’s body at specific entrances of the hospital, hospitals to assign appropriate personnel who meet specified training standards, hospitals to have reasonable protocols for alternative search and screening for patients, family, or visitors who refuse to undergo weapons detection device screening, and for hospitals to adopt reasonable protocols addressing how the hospital will respond if a dangerous weapon is detected. For hospitals that have not already deployed a weapon detection system, they will continue to evaluate solutions that will meet their organization’s culture and environment. Many hospitals will have to renovate their existing spaces to accommodate the weapon detection system implementation. Facilities will have to consider utilizing the Facility Guideline Institute and the International Association for Healthcare Security and Safety Industry and Design Guidelines.

“Unfortunately, with the continued increase in violence in healthcare and assaults against healthcare workers, I believe we will see additional states follow California’s lead and impose similar provisions requiring weapon detection systems in healthcare facilities. I look forward to helping my clients to evaluate the available solutions and to deploy the weapon detection solution that best meets their organizational culture and operational needs.”

Weapons Detection Predictions from Solutions Providers

Simon Goodyear, CEO, Metrasens: 

“In 2025, school safety strategies will center on a balanced approach that combines advanced technology with critical human oversight. With over 300 school shooting incidents reported in the U.S. in 2024 (according to the K-12 School Shooting Database), the urgency for effective, sustainable safety protocols has never been greater.

“While artificial intelligence can play a role in monitoring, it is not a standalone solution. Advanced detection technologies, such as magnetic detection systems, will be pivotal for identifying potential threats while maintaining efficient entry processes. These technologies enhance security without replacing the indispensable human element—staff, administrators, and community members—who provide the essential oversight needed to ensure a safe environment.

“School safety advocates like Ryan Petty, board member of Stand with Parkland and co-founder of The WalkUp Foundation, emphasize the importance of layered security strategies, especially during after-school events, where risks are often heightened. The People-Process-Technology framework highlights how tools can support, rather than replace, human vigilance in these critical situations.

“Another pressing challenge is balancing budgets with sustainable safety investments. Federal and state grants provide initial funding, but long-term planning is essential to maintain these systems as grant funding diminishes. Districts must weigh the cost-effectiveness of technologies to ensure affordability over time. For instance, there are solutions that come with steep price tags and require ongoing financial commitments through subscription-based models. For schools prioritizing long-term security, these costly investments can pose significant economic challenges. Investing in adaptable, cost-effective technologies, paired with grant opportunities and scalable planning, will help schools sustain safety measures for the long haul.

“In 2025, achieving safer learning environments will require districts to think beyond the immediate. A thoughtful combination of innovative technology and committed personnel will ensure schools stay secure while navigating evolving challenges.”

Mike Lahiff, CEO, ZeroEyes:

“I believe that in 2025 we will see even more school districts, public spaces and businesses adopting AI-based security solutions. Reliance on computer vision is rapidly growing, thanks to a mix of new product innovations, rising demand from different industries, and breakthroughs in technology.

“As the problem of gun-related violence continues in this country, thoughts and prayers just aren’t enough. There is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution, but a layered security program that includes perimeter security, access control, intrusion detection, and other advanced technologies is proving to be the most effective approach. We are seeing schools, hospitals, houses of worship, commercial businesses, public transit and other organizations increasingly investing in proactive AI-based solutions, and I expect this to continue into next year and beyond. I also think we will be seeing more state legislatures granting funds so schools in particular can invest in AI technology.

“People are realizing that AI has a valid role to play in preventing violence. Our Research Center has found that the vast majority of shootings occur outside buildings as the result of an escalated dispute. AI has the ability to detect and warn others the second that a weapon is illegally brandished, so that action can be taken before the first shots are fired.

“School districts will continue to weigh the benefit of weapons detection systems since many require additional support and manpower that schools often don’t have.  Many schools still operate on open campus models with multiple entry points and don’t have the budgets or staff to support screening capabilities.  Video detection systems must also be vetted to determine if the systems can perform as advertised and provide the necessary warnings needed to safeguard schools against real threats and false alarms.”

Craig Oberschlake, business development manager – education, Bosch Security and Safety Systems:

“In 2025, schools and universities will begin to combine camera-based visual gun detection with cloud-based AI verification to further improve the accuracy of detections and minimize false positives. Cloud-based AI alarm verification can add a second pair of eyes to verify questionable alerts, operating like instant replay technology in sporting events. The camera’s edge-based AI makes the call on the field and sends a short clip of that detection to the cloud for a replay review, where the cloud-based AI acts like a referee to confirm potential threats or overturn the call. Alarms by the edge-based technology are rescinded or escalated quickly via the cloud.

“We will also see continued development in this field to help schools and universities identify the presence of brandished guns further away from entrance points. Longer range visual gun detection can help give school personnel more time to react to an event in which every second counts.”

Peter Evans, CEO, Xtract One Technologies: 

“Weapons screening is getting a radical upgrade through Artificial Intelligence that’s transforming threat detection from a passive checkpoint into an intelligent, proactive defense mechanism.

“Our experts believe AI-powered systems will decode threat landscapes with incredible precision. New and upcoming technologies analyze complex behavioral patterns, material compositions, and risk indicators in microseconds – creating a holistic threat assessment more sophisticated than any human security team could manually construct.

“The breakthrough is in contextual screening, that is to say screening that doesn’t just look at one data point. Next-generation systems will integrate multiple data streams – movement patterns, physiological signals, and historical behavioral data – creating threat assessments of unprecedented sophistication.

“Machine learning algorithms will continuously refine detection models, ingesting global incident data. Weapons detection becomes an anticipatory science, identifying potential risks before traditional methods would even register a concern.

“Privacy remains core to these advances. Intelligent systems will increase safety while reducing invasive screening. Individuals will navigate spaces more freely, with advanced technology operating invisibly. We can walk into diverse environments without the need to divest items, endure pat downs, or even separate ourselves from our personal belongings like bags and purses that include laptops, phones, and other daily essentials.

“In 2025, we’re going to see more than incremental improvements to some of these technologies. However, buyers must exercise caution. The market has already been flooded with technologies making bold claims that prioritize speed at the cost of accuracy. Some solutions will sacrifice critical detection capabilities, potentially creating false senses of security that make spaces more vulnerable. Facilities must demand rigorous testing and proven performance metrics before implementing any new weapons detection system.

“We’re witnessing a fundamental reconstruction of security technology – where artificial intelligence doesn’t monitor threats, but fundamentally reinterprets how we understand risk so that we can one day eradicate prohibited and dangerous weapons from our public spaces altogether.”

Steve Novakovich, CEO, Garrett Metal Detectors:

“The earliest known use of a pendulum is a crude first century seismometer invented by Han dynasty scientist, Zhang Heng. In the 19 centuries since that time, observers have learned to anticipate that a pendulum eventually slows and changes direction, retracing a path back to center. Many social phenomena seem to follow the same pattern where an excess continues on for a period before a correction brings that excess to heel, then back to equilibrium.

“In 2025, I expect to see the excesses of security equipment marketing reach their maximum displacement from reality and begin to retrace a path back to more truthful claims and more reasonable expectations.

Specifically, I’d look for movements like these to occur:

• More school districts begin to insist on side-by-side demonstrations using real-world threat items. While it’s amazing that so many school district security screening equipment purchases have been made in the past five years without rigorous testing, the easy acceptance of “security theater” cannot continue much longer as real-world evidence is beginning to pile up.
• As truth reasserts itself in the market for security screening technology, some subscription contracts and lease agreements will be declared “voidable” by the courts. Our legal system does not enforce contracts that were based on fraud or misrepresentation (known as “fraud in the inducement”). This protection will provide a backstop for school districts who were misled and now find themselves dealing with the unfortunate combination of very large costs and weak security.
• “Best value” for security screening comes back into the decision-making process as current marketing fictions become less loudly asserted and less often believed. The school security market is on the cusp of a newfound understanding that effective security can never be “frictionless” regardless of the buzzwords being applied in the pitch. Once that truth is internalized, the full range of detection technologies will be back in competition. Let the unfettered cost/benefit analysis exercises begin!

“2025 will be a year where the security screening industry starts to undergo a cleansing process. That should be very good for the school security professionals who advise district decision makers and, subsequently, very good for the students for whom day-to-day safety is impacted by false marketing claims.”

The post 2025 Weapons Detections Predictions: AI Will Shape the Future at Schools, Hospitals appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

The Midwest-based manufacturer explains that Genetec‘s end-users can utilize the Magnasphere radar motion sensor system through Genetec’s Restricted Surveillance Area (RSA) plugin.

The Magnasphere Motion is indoor/outdoor IP66/68 rated and the sensor offers a maximum coverage capability of 66 feet.  The contact solutions company states the sensor’s wide operating temperature and ability to ignore small animals makes it a viable solution for problematic coverage areas within security systems.

Magnasphere adds that as a Genetec RSA partner, the radar motion sensor system solution is available on the Genetec Partner & Integration Hub under Partner Certified and Perimeter Protection to make the device easily accessible for Genetec dealers.

More news from Security Sales: Could Security Bollards Have Prevented New Orleans New Year’s Day Mass Killing?

The post Magnasphere Announces Genetec Integration appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

Leahey joins G4S from parent company Allied Universal, where he served as vice president of corporate finance, according to the company announcement.

Leahey will report to Tim Brandt, Allied Universal’s global chief financial officer, and Ashley Almanza, executive chairman of G4S/Allied Universal International.

Allied Universal acquired G4S in 2021 for $5.3 billion and operates using the G4S name outside of North America.

Why G4S Named Michael Leahey as CFO

In his most recent position with Allied Universal, Leahey was responsible for global financial planning and analysis where his role focused on:

• developing annual and long-term financial plans;
• facilitating strategic decisions backed by optimal investment plans;
• setting capital markets philosophy; and
• designing frameworks that facilitate critical decision support.

His professional past includes positions in investment banking with Wells Fargo Securities, as well as with private equity firm Parallax Capital Partners and several other private equity controlled private and public companies.

Leahey graduated from the University of San Diego with a bachelor of business administration degree in finance.

“Working with Mike over the past four years, I’ve been impressed by his strong work ethic, financial acumen and strategic thinking,” says Brandt in the company announcement. “He has been able to build excellent working relationships across the various organizational functions and is an impactful leader who develops, mentors and coaches staff to drive performance.

“I have no doubt he’s going to make an outstanding CFO and play a pivotal role in advancing G4S’s long-term financial and operational objectives,” he says.

“We’re excited to welcome Mike to G4S and our international headquarters in London,” says Almanza in the company announcement. “Having overseen the global financial planning and analysis activities at our parent company, he brings to bear a unique understanding of G4S and the financial and operational complexities associated with managing a global security business.

“I am confident that Mike will hit the ground running and be instrumental in helping deliver value to our stakeholders. I would also like to thank Chris Simpson for assuming the CFO role on an interim basis over the past several months as we conducted our search,” he says.

Simpson will return to his role as international group controller, the announcement says.

The post G4S Names Michael Leahey Chief Financial Officer appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

Security Sales & Integration: Without getting into any specific vendors or branded solutions, what technology category or solution area do you see as 2025’s ripest, most profitable growth opportunity for security dealers, installers and integrators? Explain your reasoning.

Caleb Augustin: Cloud-based security solutions are undoubtedly transforming the way organizations protect their people and places.

For end users, they’re centralizing device management under one common view, making it easy to scale across sites, and enabling automatic software updates that ultimately safeguard against evolving threats. For channel partners, these advantages aren’t just creating better experiences for their customers, they are also unlocking new growth opportunities at scale.

One of the biggest unlocks comes from time saved. Cloud-based solutions are often easier to set up and easier to troubleshoot (from anywhere), reducing the time that partners spend on manual configurations and on-site troubleshooting. This frees up time to focus on growing their business, building stronger customer relationships, and offering additional value-added services that drive long-term success.

SSI: These days, we’re all hearing a lot about the cloud migration, AI/machine learning, crime deterrence vs. crime reactiveness, etc. Which of these “hot topics” do you think is overplayed? Which ones do you think will truly transform the practice of security integration in the coming years? 

Augustin: Artificial intelligence isn’t just a buzzword; it’s already transforming security in ways that were hard to imagine just a few years ago.

From AI-powered alerts that can monitor and flag specific behavior to search tools that let users use natural language like “person wearing a red baseball hat last Tuesday” to find relevant footage in seconds, we’re seeing the real-world impact of AI in physical security today.

What’s exciting is that we’re still at the beginning of this transformation. As this technology evolves and the use cases expand beyond security and into broader business operations, channel partners will have even more opportunities to deliver powerful, predictive, and proactive solutions to their customers.

SSI: What’s getting better about the security industry these days? What seems to be getting worse and worse?

Augustin: One positive trend I’m seeing across the security industry is how much easier it’s becoming to integrate systems. Cloud-based physical security platforms are making security solutions more open and flexible, allowing organizations to connect their security devices with other tools and sources of data.

Some of the ways I’ve seen organizations use integrations to get more value from their security solutions include integrations with evidence collection tools to quickly and seamlessly export video archives or other data logs, or even connecting point-of-sale systems with video footage to monitor transactions and reduce shrinkage in retail environments.

It’s exciting to see how these kinds of integrations are transforming security systems into versatile solutions that support a wider range of organizational needs.

SSI: Finish this sentence: 2025 will be remembered as the year that the security industry…

Augustin: …transitions from reactive to proactive. Advancements in cloud and AI technology are helping organizations proactively identify and prevent potential threats, shifting the focus from responding to incidents to stopping them before they happen.

The post 2025 Security Industry Predictions: Caleb Augustin, Head of Channel, Verkada appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

Security Sales & Integration: Without getting into any specific vendors or branded solutions, what technology category or solution area do you see as 2025’s ripest, most profitable growth opportunity for security dealers, installers and integrators? Explain your reasoning.

Rachelle Loyear: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into security systems is a significant growth opportunity. These technologies enhance threat detection, automate responses, and provide predictive analytics, leading to more proactive security measures.

The increasing sophistication of cyberthreats to physical security infrastructure necessitates advanced solutions, positioning AI and ML as critical components in modern security strategies.

At Allied Universal, we are continually evaluating the industry and what’s available in this space. It may be a major growth opportunity, but it’s vital that security leaders embrace this technology responsibly and with forethought on how it will help mitigate their risk profile within both their risk and budgetary tolerance.

SSI: These days, we’re all hearing a lot about the cloud migration, AI/machine learning, crime deterrence vs. crime reactiveness, etc. Which of these “hot topics” do you think is overplayed? Which ones do you think will truly transform the practice of security integration in the coming years?

Loyear: One of the things we hear about a lot is “zero trust security.” While that is a critical framework to pay attention to for integrators, the drumbeat of it as a universally applicable solution is overplayed for the needs of most integrators. Implementation requires significant time, resources, and organizational alignment that many businesses are not yet prepared for.

In contrast, transformative trends like AI and machine learning, cloud migration, and IoT security are poised to redefine security integration. I discussed AI and ML in question one,  but IoT security is now truly “core curriculum” for integrators, as the number of connected devices grows, requiring more robust protocols to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.

Together, these new technologies are definitely driving a shift from reactive to proactive security, enhancing efficiency and risk mitigation.

SSI: On the business and operations side, which single factor (e.g., interest rates, talent-related issues, geopolitical stressors) poses the biggest challenge for the security industry right now? How can business owners mitigate their downside risk?

Loyear: Talent shortages pose a significant challenge, as the demand for skilled security professionals exceeds supply. This goes for integrators doubly, since now we are looking for both the traditional skillsets, but also enhanced cybersecurity knowledge to go along with it. This gap hampers the ability to effectively manage and mitigate security risks.

To address this, Allied Universal has invested heavily in training programs, has devoted significant resources to new tactics in recruiting and personnel retention, and is leveraging AI-driven tools to augment human capabilities across the board.

Talent acquisition will be more difficult for organizations that may not have the resources to do what we are doing, but it’s still an economic issue that will shape the operational side of security for years to come.

SSI: What’s getting better about the security industry these days? What seems to be getting worse and worse?

Loyear: The security industry is making great strides with advancements in technology integration, leading to smarter, more efficient security solutions. Collaboration among industry players is also on the rise, improving information sharing and strengthening collective defenses.

We see it in industry organizations like the SIA Cyber Security Board, and with the creation of groups to focus on AI and privacy, but it’s not all smooth sailing.

The complexity of cyberthreats, especially AI-driven attacks, is growing faster than many traditional defenses can keep up with, which means we have to keep up with updates and ensuring hardware and software is properly configured for the most recent threat environment.

On top of that, compliance requirements are becoming more demanding, forcing organizations to dedicate more resources to stay ahead of evolving regulations. It’s a mix of progress and pressure, with the industry pushing forward while navigating some serious challenges.

SSI: What’s liable to catch some security dealers, installers and integrators off guard in the coming year?

Loyear: As much as our industry is technology based and our partners are foundational to our solutions putting the technology first is a major mistake and will continue to have some “off guard.”  We need to focus on the outcomes first, understanding risk, operations and budget before assessing and building the proper security solution that includes technology, people and process.

SSI: What’s the single most pressing issue that professionals in the security industry should look to tackle right now?

Loyear: The rapid evolution of AI and other automated technologies could catch some integrators off guard, especially those unprepared to implement or defend against AI-driven systems. Addressing the rise of AI-enhanced cyber threats is paramount.

Developing robust defenses against AI-driven attacks and ensuring ethical use of AI in security operations are critical to maintaining trust and effectiveness in security practices.

SSI: Finish this sentence: 2025 will be remembered as the year that the security industry…

Loyear: … transformed its operations to better address workforce shortages, driving the adoption of automation and hybrid human-AI security teams. AI-powered systems took on routine monitoring and real-time threat detection, freeing human personnel to focus on complex interventions. It also marked the tipping point for cloud-based security, with organizations moving from on-premises systems to agile, scalable cloud platforms that support faster updates and remote management. These shifts fueled the rise of hybrid security ecosystems, blending physical presence, remote monitoring, and AI-driven analytics for 24/7, always-on coverage.

Click here for the 2025 Security Industry Predictions series!

The post 2025 Security Industry Predictions: Rachelle Loyear, Vice President, Allied Universal appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.

The National Electric Code is “the most widely used installation safety code in the U.S. and utilized globally to safeguard people and property from electrical hazards,” according to the NFPA announcement.

Since its establishment in 1937, the current structure of the NEC has been utilized and has provided a stable platform for electricians, contractors, engineers and training program professionals.

However, as the installation and use of electrical systems and equipment has evolved, particularly over the past two decades, industry trends, advancements in technology, and increasingly complex terminology have created a need for workers to more efficiently learn and quickly apply and inspect new and uniquely designed electrical systems, which the current structure no longer efficiently supports.

To address this need, the NEC Correlating Committee is seeking feedback on the proposed reorganization of the 2029 National Electric Code. Restructuring the existing document, according to NFPA, will “enhance the ease of learning, understanding and applying NEC requirements in today’s rapidly advancing energy landscape,” according to the association announcement.

“Over time, new technologies and innovative concepts have been added to the code where they best fit based on the limitations of the existing code structure,” says Jeff Sargent, NFPA principal specialist and staff liaison for the National Electrical Code, in the announcement.

“Gathering feedback from stakeholders who regularly use the NEC is essential to ensure we all share a common vision for developing a more robust layout, ultimately creating the best possible document for many decades to come,” he says.

Inside the NFPA’s National Electric Code Reorganization

The reorganization changes will only affect the structure and organization of the NEC and will not impact technical content, says Sargent. However, the normal NEC revision process, where technical changes can be made, will continue to occur concurrently with the reorganization changes.

The restructure process has already begun with the 2023 edition, introducing significant changes in areas such as medium voltage, limited energy, and multidirectional power flow. More foundational changes are proposed for the 2026 edition in preparation for the 2029 revision cycle, which will involve adding new chapters and restructuring existing content.

As feedback is submitted, the NEC Correlating Committee will continue to review code-making panels scopes and monitor for conflicting language and any correlation issues. The NEC Correlating Committee will also review all feedback on the proposed reorganization.

As is the case each time the National Electric Code is revised, stakeholders will have the opportunity to participate in the 2029 NEC revision process and are encouraged to submit public inputs and comments for consideration by the NEC Code-Making Panels.

To learn more about the revised organizational structure of the 2029 NEC, visit nfpa.org/NEC_reorg and download the free PDF to review the proposed changes. Submit feedback to the NEC restructure team before July 1, 2025, at NECrestructure@nfpa.org.

The post NFPA Seeks Feedback on Proposed 2029 National Electrical Code Reorganization appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.