<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AdExchanger</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.adexchanger.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/</link>
	<description>News and Views on Data-Driven Digital Advertising and Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 14:20:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>What Is AI Automating In Ad Tech?</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/the-big-story/what-is-ai-automating-in-ad-tech/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/the-big-story/what-is-ai-automating-in-ad-tech/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Sluis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 14:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[The Big Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=455982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Every company wants an AI-powered product. So what do they all look like? From A/B testing and media optimization to agentic interfaces for customers, we give a rundown on AI’s most popular applications in ad tech.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/the-big-story/what-is-ai-automating-in-ad-tech/" data-wpel-link="internal">What Is AI Automating In Ad Tech?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/the-big-story/what-is-ai-automating-in-ad-tech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Years Of ATT: What We’ve Learned, And What The Future Of iOS Performance Looks Like</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/content-studio/5-years-of-att-what-weve-learned-and-what-the-future-of-ios-performance-looks-like/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/content-studio/5-years-of-att-what-weve-learned-and-what-the-future-of-ios-performance-looks-like/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AdExchanger Content Studio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 12:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad tech evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdAttributionKit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexei Moltchan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dataseat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy-first measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probabilistic attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SKAdNetwork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verve Group]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=455758</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When Apple launched AppTrackingTransparency (ATT) in 2021, access to deterministic identifiers fell sharply as roughly 80% of users opted out of tracking. User-level feedback loops became sparse and biased, and iOS performance marketing shifted into a different measurement environment under SKAdNetwork (SKAN). Apple’s AdAttributionKit (AAK) later delayed postbacks, compressed conversion values and set privacy thresholds [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/content-studio/5-years-of-att-what-weve-learned-and-what-the-future-of-ios-performance-looks-like/" data-wpel-link="internal">5 Years Of ATT: What We’ve Learned, And What The Future Of iOS Performance Looks Like</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/content-studio/5-years-of-att-what-weve-learned-and-what-the-future-of-ios-performance-looks-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside RTL’s Plan To Aggregate Europe’s Fragmented TV And Video Supply</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/tv/inside-rtls-plan-to-aggregate-europes-fragmented-tv-and-video-supply/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/tv/inside-rtls-plan-to-aggregate-europes-fragmented-tv-and-video-supply/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Byrd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 05:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addressable TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTV fragmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTV programmatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTL Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total video strategy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=455961</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>European TV has never been an easy market for buying or selling advertising. Much like the US TV market, national broadcasters still dominate in Europe, but their content is spread across different languages, currencies and regulations. Also much like the US, Europe is undergoing a transition from linear TV to streaming and CTV. But reliable [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/tv/inside-rtls-plan-to-aggregate-europes-fragmented-tv-and-video-supply/" data-wpel-link="internal">Inside RTL’s Plan To Aggregate Europe’s Fragmented TV And Video Supply</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/tv/inside-rtls-plan-to-aggregate-europes-fragmented-tv-and-video-supply/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Price And Promo Paradox; YouTube&#8217;s Interactive TV Push</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/2026-04-09/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/2026-04-09/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AdExchanger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 04:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content creators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactive tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=455966</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Priced Out For many online advertisers, product prices and ad budgets are flip sides of the same coin. Is a brand better off discounting prices by $1 or spending $1 more per purchase on ads?  For many of the biggest CPG brands, marketing budgets are tightening after years of inflation. When shoppers decreased their grocery [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/2026-04-09/" data-wpel-link="internal">The Price And Promo Paradox; YouTube&#8217;s Interactive TV Push</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/2026-04-09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liquid Death Lets Incrementality Decide What Tactics To Kill And What To Keep</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/measurement/liquid-death-lets-incrementality-decide-what-tactics-to-kill-and-what-to-keep/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/measurement/liquid-death-lets-incrementality-decide-what-tactics-to-kill-and-what-to-keep/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allison Schiff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 05:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benoit Vatere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Leach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPGs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ibotta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incrementality measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liquid Death]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=455910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Liquid Death is known for its irreverent branding and provocative slogans, such as “murder your thirst” and “death to plastic.” Its campaigns also lean into that over‑the‑top vibe. A couple of years ago, the heavy-metal-inspired canned water brand collaborated with Burton to create deliberately dangerous flat snowboards and dared professional snowboarders to ride them and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/measurement/liquid-death-lets-incrementality-decide-what-tactics-to-kill-and-what-to-keep/" data-wpel-link="internal">Liquid Death Lets Incrementality Decide What Tactics To Kill And What To Keep</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/measurement/liquid-death-lets-incrementality-decide-what-tactics-to-kill-and-what-to-keep/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Needs ‘Corrosive Intermediaries’ Anyway?</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/adexchanger-talks/who-needs-corrosive-intermediaries-anyway/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/adexchanger-talks/who-needs-corrosive-intermediaries-anyway/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allison Schiff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 05:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AdExchanger Talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danny spears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publisher Monetization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referral traffic]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=455809</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The programmatic supply chain might not be fixable, but that doesn’t mean publishers shouldn’t try. Especially now, when they’re facing what Danny Spears, COO of publisher alliance Ozone, describes as a “perfect storm” of macro pressure, signal loss and traffic dips. “There’s something unique about this moment,” Spears says on this week’s episode of AdExchanger [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/adexchanger-talks/who-needs-corrosive-intermediaries-anyway/" data-wpel-link="internal">Who Needs ‘Corrosive Intermediaries’ Anyway?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/adexchanger-talks/who-needs-corrosive-intermediaries-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Creativity Trade-Off: What Marketers Risk Losing In The Age Of AI</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/the-creativity-trade-off-what-marketers-risk-losing-in-the-age-of-ai/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/the-creativity-trade-off-what-marketers-risk-losing-in-the-age-of-ai/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AdExchanger Guest Columnist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 04:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Data-Driven Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Creative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coca-cola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gen Z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generative AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generative AI ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millennials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Cohen]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=455914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We used to have a saying at the first agency I worked for: “Money flows to new.”  Back then, “new” meant things like QR codes, mobile video and social media. Then, tech really took off and programmatic advertising, augmented reality and data-driven insights became the new “new.” AI was also a thing, but it wasn’t [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/the-creativity-trade-off-what-marketers-risk-losing-in-the-age-of-ai/" data-wpel-link="internal">The Creativity Trade-Off: What Marketers Risk Losing In The Age Of AI</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/the-creativity-trade-off-what-marketers-risk-losing-in-the-age-of-ai/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Ads? Check Back In Two Weeks; I/Os Will Outlive Us All</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/wednesday-08042026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/wednesday-08042026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AdExchanger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 04:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAA games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple App Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal curation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal IDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epic Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fortnite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google AI Overviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-game ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linear TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediaocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaverse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oumi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rewarded video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roblox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Take-Two Interactive]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=455930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Rough Fortnite Epic Games has had an epically bad couple of weeks. Could ad revenue turn things around? The Fortnite publisher laid off over 1,000 employees two weeks ago, citing lower engagement with its flagship metaverse-like gaming property. And on Monday, a federal court dished Epic some bad news in its yearslong legal fight [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/wednesday-08042026/" data-wpel-link="internal">No Ads? Check Back In Two Weeks; I/Os Will Outlive Us All</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/wednesday-08042026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Northbeam Adds The Third Leg Of The Attribution Stool With Incrementality Testing</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/measurement/northbeam-adds-the-third-leg-of-the-attribution-stool-with-incrementality-testing/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/measurement/northbeam-adds-the-third-leg-of-the-attribution-stool-with-incrementality-testing/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Hercher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 17:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incrementality testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northbeam]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=455885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>No single ad measurement methodology works well anymore for brands with multiple points of sale. That is why attribution startups and consultants use phrases like “triangulation” to refer to a patchwork approach between multitouch attribution (MTA), marketing mix modeling (MMM) and incrementality testing. For the attribution and analytics company Northbeam, which released a new incrementality [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/measurement/northbeam-adds-the-third-leg-of-the-attribution-stool-with-incrementality-testing/" data-wpel-link="internal">Northbeam Adds The Third Leg Of The Attribution Stool With Incrementality Testing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/measurement/northbeam-adds-the-third-leg-of-the-attribution-stool-with-incrementality-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dairy-Free Creamer Brand Nutpods Is Cracking Fragmentation With AI-Powered Insights</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/marketers/non-dairy-creamer-brand-nutpods-is-cracking-fragmentation-with-ai-powered-insights/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/marketers/non-dairy-creamer-brand-nutpods-is-cracking-fragmentation-with-ai-powered-insights/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Gerber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 13:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elevate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fragmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kroger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Schroeder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutpods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Burke]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=455783</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A new marketing intelligence platform helps brands like nutpods address fragmentation by unifying data and inventory across the digital ecosystem.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/marketers/non-dairy-creamer-brand-nutpods-is-cracking-fragmentation-with-ai-powered-insights/" data-wpel-link="internal">Dairy-Free Creamer Brand Nutpods Is Cracking Fragmentation With AI-Powered Insights</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/marketers/non-dairy-creamer-brand-nutpods-is-cracking-fragmentation-with-ai-powered-insights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- plugin=object-cache-pro client=phpredis metric#hits=3034 metric#misses=10 metric#hit-ratio=99.7 metric#bytes=1948554 metric#prefetches=221 metric#store-reads=28 metric#store-writes=3 metric#store-hits=230 metric#store-misses=6 metric#sql-queries=3 metric#ms-total=347.44 metric#ms-cache=41.85 metric#ms-cache-avg=1.3950 metric#ms-cache-ratio=12.1 -->
