<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >
    <channel>
        <title>Ars Technica</title>
        <atom:link href="https://arstechnica.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://arstechnica.com</link>
        <description>Serving the Technologist since 1998. News, reviews, and analysis.</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:01:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>
            hourly        </sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>
            1        </sy:updateFrequency>
        
 
            <item>
                <title>Crypto scam lures ships into Strait of Hormuz, falsely promising safe passage</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/crypto-scam-lures-ships-into-strait-of-hormuz-falsely-promising-safe-passage/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/crypto-scam-lures-ships-into-strait-of-hormuz-falsely-promising-safe-passage/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jeremy Hsu]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 22:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scammers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strait of Hormuz]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/crypto-scam-lures-ships-into-strait-of-hormuz-falsely-promising-safe-passage/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Ship attacked by Iran after possibly falling for safe passage crypto scam.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Crypto scammers are targeting the thousands of ships stranded near the Strait of Hormuz—and at least one ship that faced Iranian gunfire may have been tricked into believing it had paid Iran for safe passage.</p>
<p>The first warning of such a crypto scam came from the Greek maritime risk management company MARISKS on April 20, according to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/scam-messages-offering-ships-safe-transit-through-hormuz-security-firm-warns-2026-04-21/">Reuters</a>. The company alerted shipowners that scammers posing as Iranian authorities had sent messages to shipping companies asking for “transit fee” payments in bitcoin or tether.</p>
<p>That may be particularly confusing for shipping companies because of how Iran has asserted control over the Strait of Hormuz—a vital shipping channel and maritime chokepoint that normally allows Persian Gulf countries to provide one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas supply. Iranian authorities have demanded <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/iran-demands-cryptocurrency-toll-from-tankers-passing-through-strait-of-hormuz/">cryptocurrency</a><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/iran-demands-cryptocurrency-toll-from-tankers-passing-through-strait-of-hormuz/"> payments</a> from oil tankers to pass through the waterway and required ships to follow a route near Iran’s coastline to undergo inspection.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/crypto-scam-lures-ships-into-strait-of-hormuz-falsely-promising-safe-passage/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/crypto-scam-lures-ships-into-strait-of-hormuz-falsely-promising-safe-passage/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Tanker-Strait-of-Hormuz-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Tanker-Strait-of-Hormuz-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>Oil tankers and gas tankers were affected by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, leading to a global energy crisis stemming from the war in the Middle East.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Tesla reports Q1 2026 earnings: Still profitable</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/tesla-reports-q1-2026-earnings-still-profitable/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/tesla-reports-q1-2026-earnings-still-profitable/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jonathan M. Gitlin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla earnings]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/tesla-reports-q1-2026-earnings-still-profitable/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Car sales are up, battery sales and emissions credits are down.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Tesla <a href="https://assets-ir.tesla.com/tesla-contents/IR/TSLA-Q1-2026-Update.pdf">published</a> its quarterly financials ahead of an investor call this afternoon. The maker of electric vehicles has become an increasingly polarized brand but a valuable one: $1.21 trillion at the time of writing. And we knew from its delivery announcement <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/tesla-sales-grew-by-6-in-q1-but-company-has-an-overproduction-problem/">earlier in April</a> that the first quarter of 2026 was rather rosy, with sales growing by a little more than 6 percent compared to the same three months in 2025. As a result, it was a more profitable quarter than last year, making $477 million in net income.</p>
<p>Revenue increased by 16 percent year over year to $22.4 billion. Automotive revenue grew by the same percentage to $16.2 billion, and Tesla saw a 42 percent increase in services (like Supercharger fees) and other revenue. But its energy storage business shrank in Q1, and revenues from this division fell by 12 percent to $2.4 billion.</p>
<p>An operating margin of 4.2 percent is far from the double-digit margins Tesla once boasted. But things were <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2025/04/teslas-death-is-not-close-says-musk-as-operating-margin-drops-to-2/">twice as bad in 2025</a>. Although the company brought in more money from automotive sales, it only made $380 million from selling regulatory credits, compared to $595 million in Q1 2025. It also made less money from leasing. Operating expenses rose due to spending on AI and part of the $1 trillion compensation package <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/11/elon-musk-wins-tesla-pay-vote-that-could-make-him-a-1-trillion-man/">that shareholders approved</a> in November for CEO Elon Musk.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/tesla-reports-q1-2026-earnings-still-profitable/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/tesla-reports-q1-2026-earnings-still-profitable/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/GettyImages-2211638677-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/GettyImages-2211638677-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Stanislav Kogiku/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>Will these robots justify Tesla's share price? Elon Musk says yes, but then he would, wouldn't he?</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Our newsroom AI policy</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/04/our-newsroom-ai-policy/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/04/our-newsroom-ai-policy/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ken Fisher]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 20:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site policy]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/04/our-newsroom-ai-policy/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[How Ars Technica uses, and doesn't use, generative AI.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year, we committed to publishing a reader-facing explanation of how Ars Technica uses, and doesn't use, generative AI. Translating our internal policy into a reader-facing document that meets our standards for clarity and precision took longer than I'd have liked, but I wanted to get it right rather than get it out fast. That document is now <a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai-policy/">live</a>, and you can find it below (and also linked in the footer of most pages on the site).</p>
<p>Our approach comes from two convictions: that AI cannot replace human insight, creativity, and ingenuity, and that these tools, used well, can help professionals do better work. From those starting points, it was always clear what we wouldn't allow. AI would not become the author, the illustrator, or the videographer. These tools are best used by professionals in the service of their profession, not as a clever end run around it, and certainly not as a path to eventually replacing it.</p>
<p>The short version: Ars Technica is written by humans. Our reporting, analysis, and commentary are human-authored. Where we use AI tools in our workflow, we use them with standards and oversight, and humans make every editorial decision. Our policy covers how we handle text, research, source attribution, images, audio, and video.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/04/our-newsroom-ai-policy/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/04/our-newsroom-ai-policy/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>127</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ars-logo-dark-background-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ars-logo-dark-background-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
</media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Lawsuit: Nintendo is getting tariff refunds—its customers should get them instead</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/lawsuit-nintendo-is-getting-tariff-refunds-its-customers-should-get-them-instead/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/lawsuit-nintendo-is-getting-tariff-refunds-its-customers-should-get-them-instead/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jon Brodkin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 20:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/lawsuit-nintendo-is-getting-tariff-refunds-its-customers-should-get-them-instead/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Lawsuit demands Nintendo pass Trump tariff refunds on to its customers.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Two gamers who want tariff refunds sued Nintendo of America yesterday, alleging that the company intends to pocket refunds received from the government instead of giving money back to consumers who paid higher prices. The <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.361585/gov.uscourts.wawd.361585.1.0.pdf">class action complaint</a> seeks to represent a class including the two named plaintiffs and all other US residents who bought Nintendo products from February 2025 to February 2026.</p>
<p>"Unless restrained by this Court, Nintendo stands to recover the same tariff payments twice—once from consumers through higher prices and again from the federal government through tariff refunds, including interest paid by the government on those funds," said the lawsuit filed in US District Court for the Western District of Washington. "Nintendo has made no legally binding commitment to return tariff-related overcharges to the consumers who actually paid them. This lawsuit seeks to prevent that unjust result."</p>
<p>The plaintiffs, California resident Gregory Hoffert and Washington resident Prashant Sharan, "paid retail prices for those goods that were increased by Nintendo to account for the tariffs imposed on imported products," and "would not have paid those higher prices absent the unlawful tariffs and Nintendo’s pass-through of those tariffs to consumers," said the complaint filed by the Emery | Reddy, PC law firm.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/lawsuit-nintendo-is-getting-tariff-refunds-its-customers-should-get-them-instead/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/lawsuit-nintendo-is-getting-tariff-refunds-its-customers-should-get-them-instead/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/nintendo-switch-1152x648-1776887603.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/nintendo-switch-500x500-1776887612.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images | AFP</media:credit><media:text>A Nintendo Switch at the Nintendo Store in New York City, on April 8, 2025.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>RFK Jr. won&#039;t back CDC director on vaccines as agency scraps positive data</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-doubles-down-on-vaccine-meddling-as-cdc-junks-scientific-study/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-doubles-down-on-vaccine-meddling-as-cdc-junks-scientific-study/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Beth Mole]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 20:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-vaccine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert f kennedy jr]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-doubles-down-on-vaccine-meddling-as-cdc-junks-scientific-study/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Kennedy's tesimony sets up another clash over vaccines with next CDC director.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>While the Trump administration has reportedly tried to rein in Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s widely unpopular anti-vaccine agenda, the political strategy is not working when it comes to words or actions. Kennedy on Tuesday suggested he would continue to meddle with federal vaccine policy, and news broke Wednesday that his political appointees have discarded scientific data that conflicts with Kennedy's anti-vaccine views.</p>
<p>In a Congressional hearing Tuesday, Kennedy refused to commit to supporting evidence-based vaccine policy from the next director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. At the same time, he refused to say that he wouldn't interfere with the agency's recommendations.</p>
<p>Last week, Trump nominated <a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/trump-picks-qualified-normal-health-leader-to-head-cdc-experts-still-cautious/">Erica Schwartz</a> to be the next CDC director, a role that requires Senate confirmation. Schwartz is a respected physician and former public health official who has championed the use of vaccines during her distinguished career. Outside experts were pleasantly surprised by the uncontroversial choice but wary of her ability to implement evidence-based policy under Kennedy. Last year, Kennedy—who has no medical, scientific, or public health background—ousted the previous Senate-confirmed director, Susan Monarez, who was, like Schwartz, a well-qualified and respected pick for the role. Monarez testified that she was pushed out for refusing to rubber-stamp vaccine recommendations from Kennedy's hand-selected anti-vaccine advisors. Monarez lasted as CDC director for just 29 days.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-doubles-down-on-vaccine-meddling-as-cdc-junks-scientific-study/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/04/rfk-jr-doubles-down-on-vaccine-meddling-as-cdc-junks-scientific-study/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2271874300-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2271874300-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty | Graeme Sloan</media:credit><media:text>Robert F. Kennedy Jr., US secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies hearing in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, April 21, 2026.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>You want your Moon landings in HD? So does NASA—here&#039;s how it&#039;s happening.</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/you-want-your-moon-landings-in-hdtv-so-does-nasa-heres-how-its-happening/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/you-want-your-moon-landings-in-hdtv-so-does-nasa-heres-how-its-happening/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Eric Berger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artemis II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/you-want-your-moon-landings-in-hdtv-so-does-nasa-heres-how-its-happening/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA["You just push this button, and in three hours, you're counting photons."]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>During most of the Artemis II mission, the crew of four astronauts beamed back low-definition video, both from inside the spacecraft and from exterior views of the Moon. It was exhilarating stuff, but in a world in which we're all watching HDTVs, it also felt a little flat.</p>
<p>This is because Orion largely communicated with Earth via radio waves, picked up by large dishes sprinkled around the world. This is pretty much the same way the Apollo spacecraft talked to Earth more than half a century ago.</p>
<p>However, unlike Apollo, the astronauts on Orion would periodically send batches of much higher-resolution data, including the stunning photographs of the far side of the Moon and the Solar eclipse observed from there. This was made possible by optical laser communications, and not just those built by NASA. The mission included a commercial component that could pave the way for vastly more data returning to Earth from space than ever before.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/you-want-your-moon-landings-in-hdtv-so-does-nasa-heres-how-its-happening/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/04/you-want-your-moon-landings-in-hdtv-so-does-nasa-heres-how-its-happening/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/20260311_QOGS-05229-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/20260311_QOGS-05229-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Nic Vevers/Australian National University</media:credit><media:text>Associate Professor Francis Bennett works on the Quantum Optical Ground Station.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Microsoft issues emergency update for macOS and Linux ASP.NET threat</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/microsoft-issues-emergency-update-for-macos-and-linux-asp-net-threat/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/microsoft-issues-emergency-update-for-macos-and-linux-asp-net-threat/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Dan Goodin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Biz & IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/microsoft-issues-emergency-update-for-macos-and-linux-asp-net-threat/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[When authentication fails, things can go very, very wrong.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Microsoft released an emergency patch for its ASP.NET Core to fix a high-severity vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to gain SYSTEM privileges on devices that use the Web development framework to run Linux or macOS apps.</p>
<p>The software maker <a href="https://github.com/dotnet/announcements/issues/395">said</a> Tuesday evening that the vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-40372, affects versions 10.0.0 through 10.0.6 of the <a href="https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection">Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection</a> NuGet, a package that’s part of the framework. The critical flaw stems from a faulty verification of cryptographic signatures. It can be exploited to allow unauthenticated attackers to forge authentication payloads during the <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.security.cryptography.hmac?view=net-10.0#remarks">HMAC validation</a> process, which is used to verify the integrity and authenticity of data exchanged between a client and a server.</p>
<h2>Beware: Forged credentials survive patching</h2>
<p>During the time users ran a vulnerable version of the package, they were left open to an attack that would allow unauthenticated people to gain sensitive SYSTEM privileges that would allow full compromise of the underlying machine. Even after the vulnerability is patched, devices may still be compromised if authentication credentials created by a threat actor aren’t purged.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/microsoft-issues-emergency-update-for-macos-and-linux-asp-net-threat/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/04/microsoft-issues-emergency-update-for-macos-and-linux-asp-net-threat/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/exploit-vulnerability-security.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/exploit-vulnerability-security-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Anthropic tested removing Claude Code from the Pro plan</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/anthropic-tested-removing-claude-code-from-the-pro-plan/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/anthropic-tested-removing-claude-code-from-the-pro-plan/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Samuel Axon]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agentic AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claude Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokens]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/anthropic-tested-removing-claude-code-from-the-pro-plan/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Untenable demand has Anthropic exploring new approaches to rationing its service.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Anthropic caused a stir among developers with what appeared to be a surprise change to its pricing plan: The company signaled that Claude Code, the popular agentic development tool, would no longer be available to subscribers on the $20-per-month Pro plan.</p>
<p>Users took to <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1srzhd7/psa_claude_pro_no_longer_lists_claude_code_as_an/">Reddit</a> and <a href="https://x.com/TheGeorgePu/status/2046705634331025855">X</a> to point out that Anthropic's pricing page for Claude explicitly showed Claude Code as not supported in the Pro plan. (It remained in the $100/month+ Max plan.) Some new users signing up for Pro subscriptions were unable to access Claude Code. Meanwhile, existing subscribers saw no interruption.</p>
<p>After speculation and frustration spread, Anthropic's head of growth, Amol Avasare, <a href="https://x.com/TheAmolAvasare/status/2046724659039932830">took to social media to clarify</a> that this was a "small test on ~2% of new prosumer signups." As for the reasoning, he explained:</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/anthropic-tested-removing-claude-code-from-the-pro-plan/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/anthropic-tested-removing-claude-code-from-the-pro-plan/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/claude-code-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/claude-code-500x500-1774983656.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Samuel Axon</media:credit><media:text>A screenshot of Claude Code running in the command line.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Coyote vs. Acme is finally getting released—with a killer trailer</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/04/coyote-vs-acme-is-finally-getting-released-with-a-killer-trailer/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/04/coyote-vs-acme-is-finally-getting-released-with-a-killer-trailer/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jennifer Ouellette]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coyote vs Acme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ketchup Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner Bros.]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/04/coyote-vs-acme-is-finally-getting-released-with-a-killer-trailer/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[What was Warner Bros. even thinking, shelving this film for so many years?]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<div class="ars-video"><div class="relative" allow="fullscreen" loading="lazy" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H-43VeYGiPM?start=0&amp;wmode=transparent"></div></div>
<p>Warner Bros.' bizarre 2023 decision to shelve its live-action/animated film, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coyote_vs._Acme"><em>Coyote vs. Acme</em></a>, sparked outrage both in the industry and among fans online. But the film is finally being released, and Ketchup Entertainment, its new distributor, recently released the trailer. All I can say after watching that trailer is, what the heck was Warner Bros. even thinking? Granted, a killer trailer doesn't automatically mean it's a great film, but all the winning elements are here.</p>
<p>The concept alone is sheer brilliance: Wile E. Coyote, after decades of ACME equipment failing him in his efforts to catch that darned Road Runner, decides to sue the corporation. It's based on a <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1990/02/26/coyote-v-acme">well-known satirical piece</a> by Ian Frazier (also titled "Coyote vs. Acme") published in The New Yorker in 1990. Development of a film version didn't start until 2018, but some pretty talented people worked on the script, including James Gunn. Big stars signed on for the main cast, and the film was completed and slated for release in July 2023.</p>
<p>Then Warner Bros. changed its mind and scheduled <em>Barbie</em> in that slot. Now, <em>Barbie</em> is a brilliant film, and that decision gave us the summer of "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbenheimer">Barbenheimer</a>," so it's hard to argue with the marketing strategy there. But rather than simply rescheduling <em>Coyote vs. Acme</em>, the studio canceled it to take a tax write-off. (The same fate befell two other Warner films, <em>Batgirl</em> and <em>Scoob! Holiday Haunt</em>.)</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/04/coyote-vs-acme-is-finally-getting-released-with-a-killer-trailer/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/culture/2026/04/coyote-vs-acme-is-finally-getting-released-with-a-killer-trailer/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>91</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/coyote1-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/coyote1-500x500-1776868310.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Ketchup Entertainment</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Google unveils two new TPUs designed for the &quot;agentic era&quot;</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/google-unveils-two-new-tpus-designed-for-the-agentic-era/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/google-unveils-two-new-tpus-designed-for-the-agentic-era/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ryan Whitwam]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generative ai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPUs]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/google-unveils-two-new-tpus-designed-for-the-agentic-era/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Google's new generation of Tensor AI chips is actually two chips, one for inference and one for training.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Most of the companies that have fully committed to building AI models are gobbling up every Nvidia AI accelerator they can get, but Google has taken a different approach. Most of its cloud AI infrastructure is based on its line of custom Tensor processing units (TPUs). After announcing the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/04/google-unveils-ironwood-its-most-powerful-ai-processor-yet/">seventh-gen Ironwood TPU</a> in 2025, the company has moved on to the <a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/infrastructure-and-cloud/google-cloud/eighth-generation-tpu-agentic-era/">eighth-gen version</a>, but it's not just a faster iteration of the same chip.</p>
<p>The new TPUs come in two flavors, providing Google and its customers with an AI platform that is faster and more efficient, the company says. Google is pushing the idea that the "agent era" is fundamentally different from the AI systems that came before, necessitating a new approach to the hardware. So engineers have devised the TPU8t (for training) and the TPU 8i (for inference).</p>
<p>Before AI models become something you can use to analyze data or make silly memes, they need to be trained. The TPU 8t was designed specifically for this part of the AI lifecycle to reduce the training time for frontier AI models from months to weeks.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/google-unveils-two-new-tpus-designed-for-the-agentic-era/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/google-unveils-two-new-tpus-designed-for-the-agentic-era/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/TPU-8t-board-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/TPU-8t-board-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Google</media:credit><media:text>Google's TPU 8t chips were designed for training AI models, not running them.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Tabloid reports linking 10 missing and dead scientists spur FBI probe</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/tabloid-reports-linking-10-missing-and-dead-scientists-spur-fbi-probe/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/tabloid-reports-linking-10-missing-and-dead-scientists-spur-fbi-probe/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ashley Belanger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 16:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocket technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UFO]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/tabloid-reports-linking-10-missing-and-dead-scientists-spur-fbi-probe/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[FBI suspects foreign spies may be targeting scientists with access to government secrets.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>The US is investigating a possible conspiracy after at least 10 scientists connected to US nuclear secrets and rocket technology went missing or died under shadowy circumstances over the past few years.</p>
<p>Pointing to tabloid reports from The Daily Mail and The New York Post, Republican members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform sought information about each missing or departed scientist. In letters to the Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Reps. James Comer (R-Ky.) and Eric Burlison (R-Mo.) said the tabloid reports had raised "questions about a possible sinister connection between a string of mysterious deaths and disappearances."</p>
<p>"If the reports are accurate, these deaths and disappearances may represent a grave threat to US national security and to US personnel with access to scientific secrets," the letters said.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/tabloid-reports-linking-10-missing-and-dead-scientists-spur-fbi-probe/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/tabloid-reports-linking-10-missing-and-dead-scientists-spur-fbi-probe/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2262176677-1024x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1024" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2262176677-500x500-1776873801.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Anadolu / Contributor | Anadolu</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Physicists think they&#039;ve solved the muon mystery</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/physicists-think-theyve-solved-the-muon-mystery/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/physicists-think-theyve-solved-the-muon-mystery/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jennifer Ouellette]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 15:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the standard model]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/physicists-think-theyve-solved-the-muon-mystery/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Results dash hopes for a fifth force but provide very precise proof of Standard Model and QFT.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Physicists have spent the last 20 years pondering an apparent discrepancy between experimental results and theoretical predictions for the magnetic properties of the muon, the electron's heavier cousin—a mismatch that hinted at a possible fifth force. But according to a new paper published in the journal Nature, the discrepancy is due to a calculation fluke, not exciting new physics, so the Standard Model of particle physics is still holding strong.</p>
<p>“There were many calculations in the last 60 years or so, and as they got more and more precise, they all pointed toward a discrepancy and a new interaction that would upend known laws of physics,” <a href="https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/particle-thought-break-physics-followed-rules-all-along">said co-author Zoltan Fodor</a>, a physicist at Penn State University. “We applied a new method to calculate this discrepancy quantity, and we showed that it’s not there. This new interaction we hoped for simply is not there. The old interactions can explain the value completely.”</p>
<p>As <a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/04/muon-g-2-results-support-hints-of-new-physics-from-20-years-ago/">previously reported</a>, the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon">muon</a> (a member of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepton">lepton</a> classification) is the heavier second-generation cousin of the electron—the tau is the third-generation cousin—and that makes muons particularly sensitive to virtual particles popping into and out of existence in the quantum vacuum, since they can briefly interact with those virtual particles. Muons are special to physicists because they are light enough to be plentiful yet heavy enough to be used experimentally to probe the accuracy of the Standard Model of particle physics.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/physicists-think-theyve-solved-the-muon-mystery/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/physicists-think-theyve-solved-the-muon-mystery/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/muon1-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/muon1-500x500-1776857464.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Dani Zemba / Penn State</media:credit><media:text>Artist’s conception of the mystery of the magnetic moment of the muon</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>New court ruling blocks many of the government&#039;s anti-renewable policies</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/new-court-ruling-blocks-many-of-the-governments-anti-renewable-policies/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/new-court-ruling-blocks-many-of-the-governments-anti-renewable-policies/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[John Timmer]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 15:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitrary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capricious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of Interior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/new-court-ruling-blocks-many-of-the-governments-anti-renewable-policies/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Added layers of review singling out renewable energy have little legal basis.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts <span style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.293725/gov.uscourts.mad.293725.89.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">issued a preliminary injunction</a> blocking the US government from applying a range of restrictions on renewable power development, at least for the parties </span>in the suit. The ruling expands on another that was <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/12/trumps-order-blocking-wind-development-thrown-out-by-court/">issued late last year</a>, applying similar logic to a broader set of federal restrictions and an expanded group of renewable energy developers.</p>
<p>While the ruling is good news for companies looking to develop non-polluting energy sources, it leaves intact one of the only attempts the government has made to rationalize its animosity toward renewable power.</p>
<h2>Arbitrary and capricious again</h2>
<p>In December, a different judge in the same court ruled that the federal government's decision to withdraw all areas of the continental shelf from potential offshore wind development violated the Administrative Procedures Act. The problem, the court determined, was that the rules were arbitrary and capricious; the only justification the government offered was that they implemented a Trump executive order.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/new-court-ruling-blocks-many-of-the-governments-anti-renewable-policies/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/new-court-ruling-blocks-many-of-the-governments-anti-renewable-policies/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-1340129766-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-1340129766-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>OsakaWayne Studios</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Indian med student rakes in thousands with AI-generated MAGA hottie</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/indian-med-student-rakes-in-thousands-with-ai-generated-maga-hottie/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/indian-med-student-rakes-in-thousands-with-ai-generated-maga-hottie/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ej Dickson, wired.com]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 14:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deepfakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake nudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/indian-med-student-rakes-in-thousands-with-ai-generated-maga-hottie/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA["Emily Hart" is a young, AI-created conservative woman who likes to take off her clothes.

]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Like many medical school students, Sam was broke.</p>
<p>The 22-year-old aspiring orthopedic surgeon from northern India got some money from his parents, but he says he spent most of it subsidizing his licensing exams, and he’s still saving up to hopefully emigrate to the US after graduation. So he started searching for ways to make additional money online.</p>
<p>Sam, who requested a pseudonym to avoid jeopardizing his medical career and immigration status, tried a few things, with varying degrees of legitimacy and success. He made <a href="https://www.wired.com/tag/youtube/">YouTube</a> shorts and sold study notes to other med students. It wasn’t until he started scrolling through his <a href="https://www.wired.com/tag/instagram/">Instagram</a> feed that he landed on an idea: Why not make an AI-generated girl using <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/google-nano-banana-2-ai-image-generator-hands-on/">Google Gemini’s Nano Banana Pro</a> and sell bikini photos of her online?</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/indian-med-student-rakes-in-thousands-with-ai-generated-maga-hottie/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/indian-med-student-rakes-in-thousands-with-ai-generated-maga-hottie/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>163</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/stripper-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/stripper-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Stockbusters via Getty</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>As EV batteries improve, ChargePoint debuts 600 kW fast charger</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/as-ev-batteries-improve-chargepoint-debuts-600-kw-fast-charger/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/as-ev-batteries-improve-chargepoint-debuts-600-kw-fast-charger/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jonathan M. Gitlin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 13:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chargepoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC fast charging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV charging]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/as-ev-batteries-improve-chargepoint-debuts-600-kw-fast-charger/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The new design is cheaper and will even fit in convenience store parking lots.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>If charging speed is one of the major stumbling blocks preventing people from considering an electric vehicle, then ChargePoint's new Express Solo DC fast charger is a step in the right direction. It has been designed to be compact and work with DC power, making it easy to install in tight spaces. Oh, and it maxes out at a hefty 600 kW.</p>
<p>As we saw with <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/catls-new-lfp-battery-can-charge-from-10-to-98-in-less-than-7-minutes/">yesterday's news from CATL</a>, EV batteries are getting more and more capable by the day. Increasing power can reduce charge times, as long as the battery can take it—BYD's new Blade battery can charge at up to 1.5 MW, and megawatt chargers are <a href="https://insideevs.com/news/791930/byd-charging-network-5000-flash/">already common across China</a>.</p>
<p>Once again, you can see how badly the US is lagging in EVs. Most Tesla Superchargers max out at 250 kW, Electrify America stops at 350 kW, and even the new IONNA stations top out at <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/circle-k-partners-with-ionna-to-upgrade-its-ev-charging-experience/">400 kW per plug</a>. So the Express Solo's 600 kW—as powerful <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2025/01/600-kw-fast-charging-pitstops-are-coming-to-formula-e/">as a Formula E pit stop</a>—sets a new benchmark, particularly for a standalone charger that could live in an urban gas station or convenience store parking lot.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/as-ev-batteries-improve-chargepoint-debuts-600-kw-fast-charger/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/as-ev-batteries-improve-chargepoint-debuts-600-kw-fast-charger/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/ChargePoint-Express-Solo-Image-1_EMBARGO-UNTIL-APRIL-22-at-8AM-ET-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/ChargePoint-Express-Solo-Image-1_EMBARGO-UNTIL-APRIL-22-at-8AM-ET-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>ChargePoint</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Our favorite gear at Sea Otter Classic wasn&#039;t the bikes—it was the accessories</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/our-favorite-gear-at-sea-otter-classic-wasnt-the-bikes-it-was-the-accessories/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/our-favorite-gear-at-sea-otter-classic-wasnt-the-bikes-it-was-the-accessories/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Cyrus Farivar]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 11:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bike gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cargo bikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric bikes]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/our-favorite-gear-at-sea-otter-classic-wasnt-the-bikes-it-was-the-accessories/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[A Bluetooth suction-cup rack and a palm-sized tow rope were among our most practical finds.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>MONTEREY COUNTY, Calif.—Bicycles are a strange technology.</p>
<p>While there have been some notable modifications from the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dandy_horse" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dandy_horse&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1776891587806000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2wiMgGU1chvR5NOL49fmcf">dandy horse</a> to the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penny-farthing" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penny-farthing&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1776891587806000&amp;usg=AOvVaw273rgHzta4_AaCrAuGeklT">penny-farthing</a>, since the advent of the “<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_bicycle" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_bicycle&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1776891587806000&amp;usg=AOvVaw16m-xqkaHT57b3kCuwiUod">safety bicycle</a>” in the 1880s, the fundamentals of bike design haven't changed all that much. Put another way, most bike riders today could understand how to use a bike made in the 1890s.</p>
<p>Still, for any bike fan, <a href="https://www.seaotterclassic.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.seaotterclassic.com/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1776891587806000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0Dvvi76KCtTiHkwyPBVcZ3">Sea Otter Classic</a>—the biggest consumer trade cycling show in the world—showcases all kinds of new rigs and creative accessories. It’s basically Christmas for bike dorks.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/our-favorite-gear-at-sea-otter-classic-wasnt-the-bikes-it-was-the-accessories/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/04/our-favorite-gear-at-sea-otter-classic-wasnt-the-bikes-it-was-the-accessories/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Allen-SB-05-Lifestyle-Beach-01-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Allen-SB-05-Lifestyle-Beach-01-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Allen Sports</media:credit><media:text>The Allen Smart Suction cups adhere to a Porsche in the company's press image. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Investors lost billions on Trump’s memecoin. Another gala won’t fix that.</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/investors-lost-billions-on-trumps-memecoin-another-gala-wont-fix-that/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/investors-lost-billions-on-trumps-memecoin-another-gala-wont-fix-that/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ashley Belanger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 11:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bribery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptocurrency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insider trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memecoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world liberty financial]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/investors-lost-billions-on-trumps-memecoin-another-gala-wont-fix-that/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[If Dems take Congress, Trump may face reckoning for “pay-to-play” memecoin galas.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>The next Donald Trump <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meme_coin">memecoin</a> event could very well be the last.</p>
<p>If Democrats retake control of Congress this fall, they may succeed in quickly passing legislation banning the president and his family from profiting from the shady token that has deeply disturbed government ethicists.</p>
<p>Trump launched his official memecoin before his inauguration in January 2025, becoming the first president to release his own cryptocurrency. Since then, Trump's family has <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2026-01-20/donald-trump-family-net-worth-increasingly-comes-from-crypto">reportedly</a> made more than $280 million, while the memecoin's value has tanked.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/investors-lost-billions-on-trumps-memecoin-another-gala-wont-fix-that/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/investors-lost-billions-on-trumps-memecoin-another-gala-wont-fix-that/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>130</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/trump-meme-coin-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/trump-meme-coin-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Aurich Lawson | Getty Images</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Pentagon wants $54B for drones, more than most nations’ military budgets</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/pentagon-wants-54b-for-drones-more-than-most-nations-military-budgets/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/pentagon-wants-54b-for-drones-more-than-most-nations-military-budgets/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jeremy Hsu]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 21:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autonomous weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military drones]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/pentagon-wants-54b-for-drones-more-than-most-nations-military-budgets/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The proposed Pentagon drone investment rivals Ukraine’s entire military budget.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>The US military’s massive $1.5 trillion budget request for the next fiscal year includes what Pentagon officials described as the largest investment in drone warfare and counter-drone technology in US history.</p>
<p>The proposed spending on drone and autonomous warfare technologies within the <a href="https://comptroller.war.gov/Budget-Materials/#press">FY2027 budget</a> proposal for the US Department of Defense would surpass <a href="https://www.iiss.org/publications/the-military-balance/2026/the-military-balance-2026/global-defence-spending/">most countries’ defense budgets</a> and rank among the top 10 in the world for military spending, ahead of countries such as Ukraine, South Korea, and Israel.</p>
<p>Specifically, the Pentagon is requesting $53.6 billion to boost US production and procurement of drones, train drone operators, build out a logistics network for sustaining drone deployments, and expand counter-drone systems to defend more US military sites. The funding request is budgeted under the Defense Autonomous Warfare Group (DAWG), an organization established in late 2025 that would see a massive budget increase after receiving about $226 million in the 2026 fiscal year budget.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/pentagon-wants-54b-for-drones-more-than-most-nations-military-budgets/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/pentagon-wants-54b-for-drones-more-than-most-nations-military-budgets/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>137</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/US-military-drone-1152x648.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/US-military-drone-500x500.jpeg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>US Marine Corps | Lance Cpl. Victor Gurrola</media:credit><media:text>Marine Corps Cpl. Calvin Burke, activates a small drone to survey the defensive line for opposing forces during a simulated assault and seizure at Glen Airfield, Queensland, Australia, July 2025. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Mozilla: Anthropic&#039;s Mythos found 271 security vulnerabilities in Firefox 150</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/mozilla-anthropics-mythos-found-271-zero-day-vulnerabilities-in-firefox-150/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/mozilla-anthropics-mythos-found-271-zero-day-vulnerabilities-in-firefox-150/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Kyle Orland]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 21:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mythos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/mozilla-anthropics-mythos-found-271-zero-day-vulnerabilities-in-firefox-150/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[CTO says new AI model is "every bit as capable" as world's best security researchers.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month, Anthropic said its Mythos Preview model was so good at finding cybersecurity vulnerabilities that <a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/anthropic-limits-access-to-mythos-its-new-cybersecurity-ai-model/">the company was limiting its initial release</a> to "a limited group of critical industry partners." Since then, debate has raged over whether the model <a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/anthropics-mythos-ai-model-sparks-fears-of-turbocharged-hacking/">presages an era of turbocharged AI-aided hacking</a> or if Anthropic is just building hype for what is <a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/uk-govs-mythos-ai-tests-help-separate-cybersecurity-threat-from-hype/">a relatively normal step up on the ladder of advancing AI capabilities</a>.</p>
<p>Mozilla added some important data to that debate Tuesday, <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/ai-security-zero-day-vulnerabilities/">writing in a blog post</a> that early access to Mythos Preview had helped it pre-identify 271 security vulnerabilities in <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Firefox/Releases/150">this week's release of Firefox 150</a>. The results were significant enough to get Firefox CTO Bobby Holley to enthuse that, in the never-ending battle between cyberattackers and cyberdefenders, "defenders finally have a chance to win, decisively."</p>
<h2>"We've rounded the curve"</h2>
<p>Holley didn't go into detail on the severity of the hundreds of vulnerabilities that Mythos reportedly detected simply by analyzing the unreleased source code of Firefox's latest version. But by way of comparison, he noted that Anthropic's Opus 4.6 model found only 22 security-sensitive bugs when <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/hardening-firefox-anthropic-red-team/">analyzing Firefox 148 last month</a>.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/mozilla-anthropics-mythos-found-271-zero-day-vulnerabilities-in-firefox-150/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/mozilla-anthropics-mythos-found-271-zero-day-vulnerabilities-in-firefox-150/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>187</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2235759925-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2235759925-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>Sorry robot, I already had &lt;em&gt;another&lt;/em&gt; robot secure this giant folder, so you can't get in!</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Supreme Court arguments make it clear that FCC fines are &quot;nonbinding&quot;</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/supreme-court-arguments-make-it-clear-that-fcc-fines-are-nonbinding/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/supreme-court-arguments-make-it-clear-that-fcc-fines-are-nonbinding/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jon Brodkin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 21:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/supreme-court-arguments-make-it-clear-that-fcc-fines-are-nonbinding/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[FCC tells Supreme Court its fines are nonbinding unless a jury upholds penalty.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court justices today expressed skepticism of AT&amp;T and Verizon's claim that the Federal Communications Commission's procedure for imposing fines violated their right to a jury trial. But companies regulated by the FCC may come out ahead in the long run even if the carriers lose this case.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T and Verizon, which were <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/04/fcc-fines-big-three-carriers-196m-for-selling-users-real-time-location-data/">fined</a> a total of $104 million for selling users’ real-time location data without consent, claim the FCC's penalty system deprived them of the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. During oral arguments today, justices repeatedly pointed out that carriers could have obtained a jury trial if they chose not to pay the fines and waited for the government to begin an enforcement action in court.</p>
<p>But even if AT&amp;T and Verizon lose this case, they could get a victory of sorts because the FCC and justices seem to agree that FCC fine decisions are nonbinding and require a court decision to enforce them. A government lawyer told justices that the FCC may change the language of its forfeiture orders to make it clearer that fines don't have to be paid until after a jury trial.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/supreme-court-arguments-make-it-clear-that-fcc-fines-are-nonbinding/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/supreme-court-arguments-make-it-clear-that-fcc-fines-are-nonbinding/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/getty-att-logo-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/getty-att-logo-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images | Joan Cros Garcia-Corbis</media:credit><media:text>AT&amp;T's stand at Mobile World Congress on February 27, 2023, in Barcelona, Spain.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>