<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 08:53:34 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>GPO</category><category>databases</category><category>Google</category><category>HeinOnline</category><category>fdlp</category><category>Copyright</category><category>Westlaw</category><category>ebooks</category><category>PACER</category><category>LOC</category><category>webinars</category><category>law library of Congress</category><category>search engines</category><category>open access</category><category>privacy</category><category>supreme court</category><category>congress</category><category>digitization</category><category>ABA</category><category>COVID-19</category><category>free government information</category><category>social media</category><category>Google books</category><category>federal courts</category><category>govdocs</category><category>libraries</category><category>Pittsburgh</category><category>digital libraries</category><category>CALI</category><category>CRS reports</category><category>EPA libraries</category><category>FOIA</category><category>Fair Use</category><category>Lexis</category><category>LexisNexis</category><category>internet</category><category>Fastcase</category><category>Google maps</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>academic libraries</category><category>coronavirus</category><category>federal courts PACER</category><category>laptops</category><category>law school</category><category>Bluebook</category><category>FDLP webinars</category><category>FDsys</category><category>Library Of Congress</category><category>TRAC</category><category>Twitter</category><category>aall</category><category>books</category><category>govinfo</category><category>international law</category><category>public resource</category><category>BNA</category><category>Malamud</category><category>SSRN</category><category>Second Life</category><category>ULS</category><category>YouTube</category><category>digital preservation</category><category>email</category><category>facebook</category><category>free law</category><category>internet law</category><category>legal education</category><category>plagiarism</category><category>ABA Journal</category><category>Bloomberg BNA</category><category>CRS</category><category>Congressional Record</category><category>EU</category><category>Elsevier</category><category>Iraq</category><category>JSTOR</category><category>Lexis Advance</category><category>OCLC</category><category>bar exam</category><category>blogs</category><category>digital archives</category><category>digital collections</category><category>foreign law</category><category>government information</category><category>internet privacy</category><category>legal research</category><category>online privacy</category><category>wikipedia</category><category>wikis</category><category>50 state databases</category><category>Chronicle</category><category>NTIS</category><category>PittLaw</category><category>ProQuest</category><category>Sunlight Foundation</category><category>TWEN</category><category>Thomas</category><category>U.S. News Rankings</category><category>US Census</category><category>US Copyright Office</category><category>barco</category><category>caselaw</category><category>citations</category><category>database trials</category><category>iPhone</category><category>law libraries</category><category>law school rankings</category><category>law schools</category><category>law students</category><category>legislative history</category><category>librarians</category><category>online legal research</category><category>patents</category><category>spam</category><category>state agencies</category><category>textbooks</category><category>useful online tools</category><category>web 2.0</category><category>ALA</category><category>Amazon</category><category>Bloomberg</category><category>Bloomberg Law</category><category>Congressional Serial Set</category><category>GPO Access</category><category>Homeland Security</category><category>Kindle</category><category>Kluwer</category><category>LLRX</category><category>Lexis Academic</category><category>Thomson</category><category>UN</category><category>United Nations</category><category>archives</category><category>bibliographies</category><category>big data</category><category>cellphones</category><category>censorship</category><category>congressional hearings</category><category>cybersecurity</category><category>data visualization</category><category>database vendors</category><category>digital newspapers</category><category>electronic legal research</category><category>friday fun</category><category>governmentdocs</category><category>immigration law</category><category>institutional repositories</category><category>law firms</category><category>law school admissions</category><category>legal scholarship</category><category>online journals</category><category>statutes at large</category><category>transparency in government</category><category>wireless</category><category>1L</category><category>ABA. Bar Exam</category><category>ADA</category><category>ARL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Booker Prize</category><category>China</category><category>Congressional</category><category>Constitution</category><category>EPA</category><category>FBI</category><category>Federal Register</category><category>Federal Reserve Bank</category><category>Federal Rules of Civil Procedure</category><category>GAO</category><category>Gmail</category><category>Google street view</category><category>Homeland Security Digital Library</category><category>LIPA</category><category>LLMC</category><category>LLOC</category><category>LLSDC</category><category>Mossberg</category><category>PLI</category><category>Pitt</category><category>Presidential election</category><category>Ravel Law</category><category>SOPA</category><category>SmartCILP</category><category>Thomson Reuters</category><category>US Code</category><category>US News rankings</category><category>United States Supreme Court</category><category>WSJ</category><category>WestlawNext</category><category>Zotero</category><category>academic publishing</category><category>apps</category><category>cloud computing</category><category>congress.gov</category><category>current awareness</category><category>data</category><category>digital books</category><category>digital publishing</category><category>dockets</category><category>ecasebooks</category><category>elections</category><category>emerging technologies</category><category>first amendment</category><category>forms</category><category>fun</category><category>historical newspapers online</category><category>immigration</category><category>internet archive</category><category>law library digitization</category><category>law reviews</category><category>law school faculty</category><category>legal databases</category><category>legal history</category><category>legal news</category><category>legal publishing</category><category>legal technology</category><category>lobbyists</category><category>national archives</category><category>new databases</category><category>online reading</category><category>phishing</category><category>podcasting</category><category>prisoner database</category><category>professional development</category><category>public domain</category><category>scholarly research</category><category>security</category><category>social networks</category><category>statistics</category><category>study guides</category><category>sustainability</category><category>terrorism</category><category>1l&#39;s</category><category>ACBA</category><category>Analytics</category><category>CILP</category><category>CMU</category><category>Copyright office</category><category>Dean Wildermuth</category><category>EEOC</category><category>Federal Regulations</category><category>GODORT</category><category>Georgia State case</category><category>Google Earth</category><category>Google Scholar</category><category>Google news</category><category>Holocaust</category><category>IP Law</category><category>Intelligence</category><category>Judges</category><category>Jurist</category><category>Justia</category><category>Justice Scalia</category><category>Law360</category><category>LexisNexis Congressional</category><category>LexisNexis digital library</category><category>MOOC</category><category>NELLCO</category><category>NY TIMES</category><category>New York Times</category><category>Open Government</category><category>Oxford University Press</category><category>PALINET</category><category>Pennsylvania law</category><category>Pennsylvania legislation</category><category>Pittsburgh Legal Journal</category><category>Presidential documents</category><category>Presidential transition</category><category>Reuters</category><category>SCOTUS</category><category>Shepard&#39;s</category><category>Tax Notes</category><category>Title 44</category><category>Title IX</category><category>ULS databases</category><category>USDA</category><category>USPTO</category><category>WWII database</category><category>West Headnotes</category><category>White House</category><category>WorldCat</category><category>accessibility</category><category>acquisitions</category><category>antitrust law</category><category>apps for lawyers</category><category>arbitration</category><category>best government website</category><category>bookstore</category><category>campus maps</category><category>case law</category><category>casebooks</category><category>civil rights</category><category>class action lawsuits</category><category>commons collection</category><category>computers</category><category>cooltools</category><category>digital Congressional Record</category><category>digitzation</category><category>discovery</category><category>diversity resources</category><category>drm</category><category>e-government</category><category>e-textbooks</category><category>economic data</category><category>electronic books</category><category>email alerts</category><category>email migration</category><category>environmental law</category><category>epublishing</category><category>executive branch</category><category>fake Steve Jobs</category><category>fddsys</category><category>file-sharing</category><category>firefox</category><category>fonts</category><category>free websites</category><category>freedom of speech</category><category>gadgets</category><category>government</category><category>government websites</category><category>human rights</category><category>identity theft</category><category>impeachment</category><category>internet in classrooms</category><category>internet security</category><category>journalism</category><category>law clinics</category><category>law school graduates</category><category>legal search engine</category><category>legal treatises online</category><category>legal writing</category><category>library</category><category>library digitization</category><category>library services</category><category>library stacks</category><category>maps</category><category>metadata</category><category>microfiche</category><category>online classes</category><category>online courses</category><category>online databases</category><category>online education</category><category>online music</category><category>online publishing</category><category>oral history</category><category>orphan works</category><category>pdf&#39;s</category><category>photocopying</category><category>photoshop</category><category>preservation and conservation</category><category>prison libraries</category><category>recycling</category><category>reference librarians</category><category>religion</category><category>remote access</category><category>scanners</category><category>scholarly publishing</category><category>self-driving cars</category><category>skype</category><category>slaw</category><category>staplers</category><category>state government</category><category>state library of Pennsylvania</category><category>students</category><category>surveillance</category><category>tax law research</category><category>teaching</category><category>training</category><category>universal citation</category><category>veterans</category><category>virtual worlds</category><category>wearable technology</category><category>webcams</category><category>webinar</category><category>women</category><category>yahoo</category><category>&quot;free the law&quot; project</category><category>14th Amendment</category><category>2016</category><category>3D</category><category>9/11</category><category>AAUP</category><category>ABA Techshow</category><category>ACLS</category><category>ACLU</category><category>AI</category><category>ALI</category><category>ALR</category><category>Academic</category><category>Adobe Acrobat;pdfs;web-based applications</category><category>Adobe Reader</category><category>African American history</category><category>Airtable</category><category>Albany Law School</category><category>American Lawyer Media</category><category>American Memory Project</category><category>April 1</category><category>Aquisitions</category><category>Archive of European Integration</category><category>Artificial Intelligence</category><category>Australia</category><category>Authors Guild</category><category>Ballmer</category><category>Big Think</category><category>Blacklight</category><category>Blackmun</category><category>Bourne</category><category>British Library</category><category>CASA</category><category>CDC</category><category>CDs</category><category>CEDSCI</category><category>CFR</category><category>CLE</category><category>CMS</category><category>CRIV</category><category>CSSD</category><category>Cambridge University Press</category><category>Canadian law</category><category>Casemaker</category><category>Cathedral of Learning</category><category>Change Congress</category><category>Civil Cases</category><category>Clio</category><category>Code of Federal Regulations</category><category>Cold War</category><category>Congressional Research Service</category><category>Congresspedia</category><category>Copyright Public Modernization Committee</category><category>Cornell</category><category>CourtLink</category><category>Cuba</category><category>DNA</category><category>DOT</category><category>DPLA</category><category>Department of Defense</category><category>Dickinson</category><category>Dickinson Law Review</category><category>Dr. Seuss</category><category>EEO</category><category>ERIC</category><category>EULA</category><category>Ebola</category><category>End of Term Presidential Harvest</category><category>European library</category><category>FERC</category><category>FGI</category><category>FHA</category><category>FIAF</category><category>FISA</category><category>FTC decisions</category><category>Fastcase 7</category><category>G-20</category><category>GIO</category><category>GIS</category><category>GLBT</category><category>GLIN</category><category>GPO Congressional</category><category>GPO Director</category><category>GPO website</category><category>Gale</category><category>Gateway</category><category>Gen Z</category><category>Georgia</category><category>Gogle Chrome</category><category>Google grants</category><category>Google images</category><category>Google search</category><category>Google video</category><category>Government documents</category><category>H2O</category><category>Harvard Law Library</category><category>Harvard Law School</category><category>House</category><category>I am not making this up</category><category>ICE</category><category>ICNL</category><category>IFLA</category><category>ILPR</category><category>IP authentication</category><category>IPUMS</category><category>IRCworld</category><category>In the First Person</category><category>InSITE</category><category>India</category><category>Innovation</category><category>Jane Sánchez</category><category>Jott</category><category>Journal of Infometrics</category><category>Judicial conference</category><category>Jureeka</category><category>Justice Department</category><category>Justice Kagan</category><category>Justice Thomas</category><category>Justinian Code</category><category>Knol</category><category>LII</category><category>Law 360</category><category>Law360 Pulse</category><category>LawPORT</category><category>Legal Information Archive Project</category><category>Leiter</category><category>Lessig</category><category>Lex Machina</category><category>Lexis Answers</category><category>LexisNexis Statistical Insight</category><category>Link Builder</category><category>Lynda</category><category>MBE</category><category>MapLight</category><category>Maryland</category><category>Mass Observation; ULS</category><category>McGill</category><category>Melvil Dewey</category><category>Minerva</category><category>Mossack Fonseca</category><category>Mueller Report</category><category>NASA</category><category>NASIG</category><category>NHC</category><category>NOAA</category><category>NSSE</category><category>National Research Council</category><category>Nauru</category><category>New York Law School</category><category>Nordenberg</category><category>North Carolina courts</category><category>Northwestern</category><category>O&#39;Connor</category><category>OECD</category><category>OER</category><category>OLRC</category><category>OPAC</category><category>Office of US Courts</category><category>Open Access Week</category><category>Open Casebook</category><category>Open Educational Resources</category><category>Open Graph</category><category>Open House Project</category><category>Oyez project</category><category>PA statutes online</category><category>PC</category><category>PPQ</category><category>Panama papers</category><category>Paratext</category><category>Patriot Act</category><category>Patry</category><category>Peeps</category><category>Penn State law review</category><category>Pennsylvania government</category><category>Phoenix school of law</category><category>Pitt Cyber</category><category>Pitt News</category><category>PittCat</category><category>Pittsburgh Courier</category><category>PowerPoint</category><category>Preservica</category><category>President Elect Trump</category><category>Presidential Commission Reports</category><category>Print on Demand</category><category>Public Laws</category><category>Public Papers of the Presidents</category><category>Purdon&#39;s</category><category>REALM Project</category><category>RIA</category><category>RIAA hearing to be webcast</category><category>ROSS Intelligence</category><category>Readex</category><category>Real ID</category><category>RealPlayer</category><category>Russia</category><category>Russia Georgia conflict</category><category>Ruth Bader Ginsburg</category><category>SMU</category><category>SearchMash</category><category>Seeqpod</category><category>Society for Emprical Legal Studies</category><category>Subject Headings</category><category>Sun. fun</category><category>Tapella</category><category>Teams</category><category>Thurgood Marshall Law Library</category><category>U. Penn</category><category>U.S. Code</category><category>U.S. Presidential database</category><category>UCLA</category><category>UELMA</category><category>UN Treaties Series</category><category>UN Treaty Series</category><category>US Army War College</category><category>US District Courts</category><category>US Documents Masterfile (USDM)</category><category>USAFacts</category><category>Uber</category><category>UmbraSearch</category><category>United Nations Digital Library</category><category>University of California</category><category>University of Pittsburgh</category><category>Viacom</category><category>Vivisimo</category><category>WK Study Aid Library</category><category>WPA</category><category>WWI database</category><category>War Powers</category><category>Washington Post</category><category>Watergate</category><category>Wayback Machine</category><category>Wecht</category><category>WestCheck</category><category>Westlaw Classic</category><category>Westlaw databases</category><category>Westlaw watch</category><category>Wexis</category><category>WikiLeaks</category><category>Wiley</category><category>Wilsonweb</category><category>Windows</category><category>Word</category><category>XML</category><category>Zoom</category><category>access to justice</category><category>accreditation</category><category>adjuncts</category><category>administrative law</category><category>affirmative action</category><category>air law</category><category>air travel</category><category>algorithms</category><category>almanac of higher education</category><category>altlaw</category><category>android phones</category><category>animal law</category><category>anti-spam</category><category>appls</category><category>astroturf</category><category>attorney directories;Martindale-Hubbell</category><category>audio</category><category>audio files</category><category>auto industry</category><category>awards</category><category>bankruptcy</category><category>bankruptcy filings</category><category>bepress</category><category>bergman</category><category>bibliographic control</category><category>bibliography</category><category>bibliophilia</category><category>bill tracking</category><category>blawgs</category><category>blockchain</category><category>blog action day</category><category>blogs;twitter</category><category>book covers</category><category>bookmarking</category><category>bookscanners</category><category>born digital collections</category><category>bridges</category><category>browser extentions</category><category>browsers</category><category>bulwer-lytton</category><category>calculators</category><category>candy</category><category>capital punishment</category><category>card catalogues</category><category>cataloging</category><category>cellphone directory</category><category>change.gov</category><category>chatbots</category><category>cheating</category><category>church and state</category><category>civil law</category><category>civil rights movement</category><category>clerkships</category><category>clery act</category><category>clickbait</category><category>clickers</category><category>clickwrap</category><category>climate change</category><category>common law</category><category>community service</category><category>computer programming</category><category>conflict of laws</category><category>congressional committees</category><category>constitutions</category><category>continuing education</category><category>converters</category><category>copy and paste</category><category>counterfeit books</category><category>countries database</category><category>court libraries</category><category>crime</category><category>criminal law</category><category>cultural property</category><category>current law journal content</category><category>curriculum</category><category>cyberbullying</category><category>cyberspace</category><category>darfur</category><category>databases;uls</category><category>daylight losing</category><category>death penalty</category><category>debate</category><category>delicious</category><category>demographics</category><category>depositions</category><category>dictionaries</category><category>digital access</category><category>digital commons</category><category>digital divide</category><category>digital documents</category><category>digital images</category><category>digital initiatives</category><category>digital legal libraries</category><category>digital natives</category><category>digital rights management</category><category>digital scholarship</category><category>digitizing</category><category>directories</category><category>disaster legal services</category><category>disruptive students</category><category>diversity</category><category>dog law</category><category>eCFR</category><category>eart day</category><category>earthquake</category><category>ebrary</category><category>economy</category><category>ejournals</category><category>election</category><category>electronics</category><category>emoticons</category><category>empirical legal studies database</category><category>empirical research</category><category>encyclopedias</category><category>end-of-term</category><category>energy law</category><category>ereaders</category><category>ethics</category><category>events</category><category>faculty evaluations</category><category>fake news</category><category>family law</category><category>fda</category><category>federal Statute compilations</category><category>federal agency publications</category><category>federal case law</category><category>federal digital system</category><category>federal prisons</category><category>federated search</category><category>film</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>findlaw</category><category>first sale doctrine</category><category>fish fries</category><category>forgetfulness</category><category>fountain of youth</category><category>free court information</category><category>free speech</category><category>freedom</category><category>fugitive documents</category><category>gay and lesbian</category><category>gender</category><category>genome testing</category><category>geotagging</category><category>gifts</category><category>global corruption</category><category>global legal monitor</category><category>google scholar; caselaw</category><category>google sky</category><category>gov docs</category><category>grants</category><category>green bag</category><category>green computing</category><category>handhelds</category><category>hashtags</category><category>hate crimes</category><category>hathitrust</category><category>health</category><category>health law</category><category>help desk</category><category>hierarchies</category><category>higher education act</category><category>history</category><category>hot news doctrine</category><category>house of representatives</category><category>housing foreclosures</category><category>https</category><category>humor</category><category>hurricane gustav</category><category>hyperlinks</category><category>iPods</category><category>iTunes U</category><category>images</category><category>income tax</category><category>indexing</category><category>indexing video</category><category>infographics</category><category>information</category><category>information literacy</category><category>innocence</category><category>innocence project</category><category>international</category><category>internet exceptionalism</category><category>internet history</category><category>internet of things</category><category>inventions;Time</category><category>isbn</category><category>joint degree programs</category><category>judicial branch</category><category>judicial misconduct</category><category>jurors</category><category>keyword search</category><category>law and health</category><category>law firm librarians</category><category>law journals</category><category>law librarian radio</category><category>law librarianship</category><category>law library journal</category><category>law library reference</category><category>law office technology</category><category>law reviews online</category><category>law school accreditation</category><category>law school deans</category><category>law school economics</category><category>law school exams</category><category>law school libraries</category><category>law school software</category><category>lawyering</category><category>lawyers</category><category>leadership</category><category>leaked documents</category><category>legal aid</category><category>legal conferences</category><category>legal database</category><category>legal epidemiology</category><category>legal information</category><category>legibility</category><category>libguides</category><category>librarianship</category><category>library collection</category><category>library conferences</category><category>library echnology</category><category>library patrons</category><category>library robots</category><category>library training</category><category>licensing agreements</category><category>link rot</category><category>linkedin</category><category>literature</category><category>litigation</category><category>looseleafs</category><category>lwob</category><category>machine translation</category><category>mapping</category><category>martindale hubbell</category><category>media files</category><category>memes</category><category>memory</category><category>mind rot</category><category>mindfulness</category><category>mindset</category><category>miscellaneous</category><category>mobile apps</category><category>modernizing</category><category>mylanguage</category><category>national bridge inventory</category><category>natural language</category><category>new books</category><category>new journal</category><category>new technologies</category><category>news</category><category>news search</category><category>newspapers</category><category>ninth circuit</category><category>off-shore tax havens</category><category>online</category><category>online catalogs</category><category>online communities</category><category>online dictionary</category><category>online maps</category><category>online press</category><category>online reputation</category><category>online storage</category><category>online textbooks</category><category>online training</category><category>online translation</category><category>open archives</category><category>open data</category><category>open education</category><category>open source</category><category>organizing information</category><category>passwords</category><category>pathfinders</category><category>pdf</category><category>pedagogy</category><category>peer-to-patent</category><category>pennsylvania statutes</category><category>perma.cc</category><category>photosynth</category><category>piracy</category><category>podcasts</category><category>politics</category><category>population</category><category>practice management</category><category>presidential initiatives</category><category>presidential libraries</category><category>print</category><category>printing</category><category>prison reform</category><category>public access</category><category>public records</category><category>public service</category><category>pubmed</category><category>reading</category><category>real estate database</category><category>reference questions</category><category>refugee resettlement</category><category>remote learning</category><category>repository</category><category>research libraries</category><category>research tools</category><category>researchgate</category><category>restorative justice</category><category>robocalls</category><category>rss</category><category>satellite images</category><category>search</category><category>search terms</category><category>section 108 study group</category><category>semantic web</category><category>sexual harassment</category><category>sexual orientation law</category><category>sites</category><category>smartphones</category><category>smileys</category><category>snailmail</category><category>soap</category><category>social bookmarking</category><category>social engineering</category><category>social science</category><category>software</category><category>space law</category><category>spam law</category><category>spoofing</category><category>sports law</category><category>stalking</category><category>state databases</category><category>state law</category><category>state legislatures</category><category>statistical abstract</category><category>stay-at-home orders</category><category>steelers</category><category>subprime mortgage crisis</category><category>summer access</category><category>super bowl</category><category>surveys</category><category>swine flu</category><category>take your children to work day</category><category>tattoos</category><category>technology</category><category>technology in court</category><category>technology in courts</category><category>terms of service</category><category>the Markup</category><category>the virtual chase</category><category>tips</category><category>tradmark</category><category>transactional law</category><category>translation</category><category>treasury dept.</category><category>treaties</category><category>tutorials</category><category>typography</category><category>university websites</category><category>unpaywall</category><category>unreported publications</category><category>usability</category><category>video</category><category>visualizations</category><category>visualwikipedia</category><category>voice assistants</category><category>voting rights</category><category>web archiving</category><category>web-based applications</category><category>webcasts</category><category>website ownership</category><category>website registration</category><category>websites</category><category>west publishing</category><category>widgets</category><category>wmd report card</category><category>workplace bias</category><category>wrongful convictions</category><category>zeutschel</category><title>Barco 3.0 : Law Library Reference</title><description>Helpful information from the librarians of the Barco Law Library, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.pitt.edu&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;University of Pittsburgh School of Law&lt;/u&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2540</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-5995651217046170931</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2022-02-11T13:11:37.448-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">linkedin</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">news</category><title>LinkedIn adds &quot;No politics&quot; button</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Windows Central reports that LinkedIn now has a &quot;no politics&quot; button that you can enable on your LinkedIn account&#39;s news feed.&amp;nbsp;It filters out content about political parties and candidates, election outcomes, ballot initiatives and more. This is a new feature that LinkedIn has added. &quot;This is all about giving all of our members greater choice and control,&quot; a spokesperson for LinkedIn said.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2022/02/linkedin-adds-no-politics-button.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-3138953384398947193</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2022-02-02T12:01:50.881-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Copyright</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ebooks</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">libraries</category><title>Maryland Library e-book &quot;battle&quot;</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Publishers Weekly has an &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/libraries/article/88415-with-aap-reply-legal-battle-over-maryland-library-e-book-law-intensifies.html&quot;&gt;excellent article &lt;/a&gt;about the court battle between the Association of American Publishers and the new Maryland library e-book law. According to the article, the AAP&amp;nbsp;doubled down on their claim that Maryland’s library e-book law is clearly preempted by the federal Copyright Act, and said supporters of the law are seeking to “unravel decades of federal legislation and jurisprudence that delineate the contours of copyright law.”&lt;br /&gt;The article has links to the court filings.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2022/02/maryland-library-e-book-battle.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-4966426685441162335</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2022-02-02T11:44:32.508-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CRS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PACER</category><title>More on free PACER: </title><description>The Congressional Research Service&lt;a href=&quot;https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10672&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; (CRS) reports&lt;/a&gt; on Legislative efforts to increase access to PACER: &lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;On December 9, 2021, the Senate Judiciary Committee favorably ordered reported the Open Courts Act
of 2021, S. 2614. At the markup session, the committee ordered to be reported, by voice vote, the bill with
an amendment in the nature of a substitute. It is one of two legislative proposals introduced this Congress
to eliminate the U.S. Courts’ current user fee structure for searching and accessing federal court filings on
PACER. While S. 2614, as amended in committee, would make PACER free for the general public, each
federal agency would be charged an annual fee equal to the total PACER fees paid by the agency in 2021
(adjusted for inflation).
In addition to removing PACER user fees for the general public, both the Senate Judiciary Committee and
House-introduced versions of the Open Courts Act of 2021 (S. 2614 and H.R. 5844) require the AO to
modernize PACER’s technical functionality, including the additions of full-text search capabilities and
“widely accepted common data elements.” Meanwhile, the AO has been independently weighing
recommendations of 18F—the U.S. government technology and design consultant group—to improve
  functionalities of the public-facing PACER and underlying CM/ECF systems.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not just free PACER, but PACER with a user-friendly interface!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2022/02/more-on-free-pacer.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-4587641642778502405</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-12-10T08:02:35.253-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PACER</category><title>Free PACER?</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The Reuters headline grabbed me: &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/free-pacer-bill-end-fees-online-court-records-advances-senate-2021-12-09/&quot;&gt;Free PACER? Bill to end fees for online court records advances in Senate&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; It&#39;s a bipartisan bill called the &lt;a href=&quot;https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/gdpzymkaovw/SIL21D37.pdf&quot;&gt;Open Courts Act of 2021&lt;/a&gt; and the Senate Judiciary Committee approved the measure on voice voate without any recorded opposition (who could be against it?). It would certainly be a nice New Year&#39;s gift to law libraries and law librarians!&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/12/free-pacer.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-4847370197967771378</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-12-07T12:05:32.155-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">data</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Federal Reserve Bank</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">online classes</category><title>Data Literacy online course from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</title><description>&lt;p&gt;The Research Information Services Team at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis has developed a micro-credentialing program on data literacy skills for librarians. The program is free. It is administered via the Canvas CMS.&amp;nbsp; From the blurb: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The Research Division at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis is widely known for its flagship data service FRED®. An integral part of our work facilitating access to data is building capacity among consumers to use data effectively and accurately.

Our Library Services and Economic Education teams have developed a fully asynchronous online professional development program on data literacy for librarians. This program focuses on seven foundational data literacy competencies and uses FRED® data to provide opportunities for hands-on learning.

Each competency in the program is matched to a digital badge issued by Credly. Librarians successfully completing individual modules will receive, at no cost, Credly badges certifying their achievement. After completing all seven individual modules, librarians will receive a digital micro-credential on data literacy.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Participants will develop seven competencies:&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;- Saving Graphs and Downloading Data&lt;br /&gt;- Identifying Data Sources and Release Frequencies&lt;br /&gt;- Understanding Data Types and Units&lt;br /&gt;- Visualizing Data&lt;br /&gt;- Storytelling with Data&lt;br /&gt;- Acting on Data&lt;br /&gt;- Using Data Ethically&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Information is available at &lt;a href=&quot;https://research.stlouisfed.org/info-services/data-literacy-for-librarians/&quot;&gt;this link&lt;/a&gt;. Register for the free program via &lt;a href=&quot;https://customervoice.microsoft.us/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=U8aXsxlbP0a5_K9lje2RKAedjwoWZg9Elkq9DaIsW8FUMzhDNjMzTVYyQzNGTUpISjNES0pEU0MwUy4u&quot;&gt;this link&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/12/data-literacy-online-course-from.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-1730393856007451719</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-11-18T12:19:00.191-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">browsers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">IP authentication</category><title>Is IP authentication about to &quot;break&quot;? </title><description>&lt;p&gt;An organization called&lt;a href=&quot;https://seamlessaccess.org/learning-center/browser-faq/&quot;&gt; SeamlessAccess warns&lt;/a&gt; that because of new privacy protections enacted by browser vendors, IP authentication, the predominant means of authorizing access to scholarly resources, may become obsolete.The article title is &quot;FAQ on Browser Privacy Changes and Library Resource Access (Or Why Your IP Authentication is About to Break). The article reports that Apple recently announced that subscribers to their iCloud+ service will have their IP address obfuscated from website operators; other browser vendors are also moving in the direction of supporting consumer privacy and may follow Apple&#39;s lead.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/11/is-ip-authentication-about-to-break.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-936066349412427638</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-09-24T12:19:41.853-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">directories</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gen Z</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">hierarchies</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">information</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">organizing information</category><title>Have students lost the ability to mentally organize hierarchically? </title><description>&lt;p&gt;There&#39;s an interesting article in The Verge titled &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theverge.com/22684730/students-file-folder-directory-structure-education-gen-z&quot;&gt;&quot;FILE NOT FOUND: A generation that grew up with Google is forcing professors to rethink their lesson plans.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Apparently college faculty are increasingly finding that students are confused about the concept of hierarchical organizing. &lt;blockquote&gt;(The professor) came to the same realization that many of her fellow educators have reached in the past four years: the concept of file folders and directories, essential to previous generations’ understanding of computers, is gibberish to many modern students. (Another professor) noticed that students in his classes were having trouble finding their documents.

 &lt;/blockquote&gt; 
  &lt;br/&gt;According to the article, the mental model that most of us use to keep things organized is known as &quot;directory structure.&quot; For example, it’s the idea that a modern computer doesn’t just save a file in an infinite expanse; it saves it in the “Downloads” folder, the “Desktop” folder, or the “Documents” folder, all of which live within “This PC,” and each of which might have folders nested within them, too. The directory structure connotes physical placement — the idea that a file stored on a computer is located somewhere on that computer, in a specific and discrete location. That’s a concept that’s always felt obvious to the professor but seems completely alien to her students.  It’s a difficult concept to get across. Directory structure isn’t just unintuitive to students — it’s so intuitive to professors that they have difficulty figuring out how to explain it. “Those of us who have been around a while know what a file is, but I was at a bit of a loss to explain it,” lamented one educator&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/09/have-students-lost-ability-to-mentally.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-6201670475100093127</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-09-23T12:21:56.012-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CFR</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Code of Federal Regulations</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">eCFR</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Federal Register</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">GPO</category><title>New eCFR website!</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;A &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fdlp.gov/news-and-events/5138-new-ecfr-website?utm_source=newsletter_2629&amp;amp;utm_medium=email&amp;amp;utm_campaign=new-ecfr-website&quot;&gt;welcome announcement &lt;/a&gt;from the Government Publishing Office and the FDLP:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;The Office of the Federal Register (OFR) and the U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO) have formally launched a &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ecfr.gov/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;new eCFR website&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(CFR = the Code of Federal Regulations.) Over the last few years, OFR and GPO developed significant improvements that are now available on the new eCFR website, including the ability to:
&lt;br /&gt;• Show which sections have been recently updated.
&lt;br /&gt;• Display and compare previous versions of text.
&lt;br /&gt;• Link references between content within the CFR and the Federal Register.
&lt;br /&gt;• Link references within the content to the United States Code.
&lt;br /&gt;• Jump directly to text by entering a citation in the “Go to CFR Reference” box.
&lt;br /&gt;• Provide expandable tables that are scrollable.&lt;br /&gt;• View higher-quality images.
&lt;br /&gt;• Find documents with an improved search engine.
&lt;br /&gt;• Create a &#39;My eCFR&#39;account to receive notifications when selected areas of the eCFR are updated.
&lt;br /&gt;• Present text in a new, more readable format with the ability to create links to lower levels of the codification.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ecfr.gov/reader-aids/using-ecfr/getting-started&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Getting Started&lt;/a&gt;&quot; page for a comprehensive introduction to the main features of the new website.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The eCFR is a web version of the CFR that is updated daily to reflect its current status. It is an editorial compilation of CFR material and amendments published in the daily Federal Register. It has been developed and maintained, by the GPO and the OFR as an informational resource.&amp;nbsp;The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on the eCFR with the objective of eventually establishing the eCFR as a publication officially recognized by the ACFR. This means that while they try to ensure that the material on the eCFR is accurate, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against the most current official edition of the CFR, the daily Federal Register, and the List of CFR Sections Affected (LSA).&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/09/new-ecfr-website.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-3904815093167043522</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-07-16T08:08:13.239-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ABA. Bar Exam</category><title>Studying for the Bar Exam</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The ABA Journal has an article titled &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/when-it-comes-to-studying-for-the-bar-exam-how-much-is-too-much?utm_medium=email&amp;amp;utm_source=salesforce_417570&amp;amp;sc_sid=01309704&amp;amp;utm_campaign=weekly_email&amp;amp;promo=&amp;amp;utm_content=&amp;amp;additional4=&amp;amp;additional5=&amp;amp;sfmc_j=417570&amp;amp;sfmc_s=50740608&amp;amp;sfmc_l=1527&amp;amp;sfmc_jb=10009&amp;amp;sfmc_mid=100027443&amp;amp;sfmc_u=12082879&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&quot;When it comes to studying for the bar exam, how much is too much?&quot;&lt;/a&gt; - which may be of interest to all sleep-deprived Class of 2021 law school graduates. The article reports on a study of 107 California law school grads, and how they fared in taking the bar exam in 2017. Some of the results:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;The study group had a 77% bar pass rate.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The median for daily study was 8.1 hours, and candidates who studied that amount had a better than 75% likelihood of passing the bar exam.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Candidates who studied 10 or more hours daily were more likely to report running out of time and also reported feeling they studied the wrong material&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Candidates who worked at a job while studying for the bar, even if it was only for 2 hours a day, had a lowered likelihood of passing the bar: 63%. Candidates who did not work had a 78% chance of passing.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Candidates who averaged two daily study sessions with a break in between had a 75% chance of passing, compared with 45% for those who only had one study session.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/07/studying-for-bar-exam.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-6804143552122225902</guid><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-06-25T10:28:52.974-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">COVID-19</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">online classes</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">remote learning</category><title>How have law student perceptions of online learning changed over the past year?  </title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Professor Victoria Sutton of Texas Tech School of Law has published the results of a study she has done comparing law student perceptions of online learning in May 2020 and May 2021.&amp;nbsp; Her article, titled &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3865262&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Perceptions of Online Learning and COVID-19 Countermeasures Among Law Students in a One-year Followup Study&quot; is available on SSRN&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; From the abstract:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;...&quot;preference for online courses is increasing by 17%, despite the fear
that burnout or frustration from the COVID-19 transition to online learning for law
schools would create a general dislike for online courses. There are still a significant
number of students who have difficulty with online learning of as many as 25%.
About 72% of the respondents feel safe returning to class with no pandemic
precautions, but accommodations should be considered early in the planning stages for
the semester for those 15% who still do not feel safe enough to return to the classroom.
In general, the survey dispelled a wide concern that online courses would sour
students to online teaching, but it had the opposite effect, resulting in a significant
increase in interest in online learning in law schools.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Prof. Sutton conducted her study via an email survey that was reviewed by the Texas Tech Health Sciences Center Institutional Review Board. She had a 42% return rate, which is &quot;exceptionally high&quot; for an email survey.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/06/how-have-law-student-perceptions-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-2793922048557029443</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-06-23T12:56:42.499-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Library Of Congress</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ruth Bader Ginsburg</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">United States Supreme Court</category><title>Library of Congress: new finding aid for RBG Papers</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The Library of Congress (LOC) website has a new &lt;a href=&quot;https://findingaids.loc.gov/db/search/xq/searchMfer02.xq?_id=loc.mss.eadmss.ms019019&amp;amp;_faSection=overview&amp;amp;_faSubsection=did&amp;amp;_dmdid=&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;finding aid for the Ruth Bader Ginsburg papers, 1897-2005&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Ruth Bader Ginsburg was, of course, a U.S. Supreme Court justice, judge, lawyer, and educator. The LOC collection contains &quot;correspondence, memoranda, case files, speeches, lectures, writings, reports, interviews, briefs, orders, opinions, motions, depositions, and other papers relating chiefly to Ginsburg&#39;s efforts as an advocate for women&#39;s rights, particularly through her speeches and writings and her endeavors as general counsel to the American Civil Liberties Union and director of its Women&#39;s Rights Project. Documents her work as a proponent for the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s, as law professor at Columbia University, and as a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, 1980-1993. Also includes family papers and material relating to Ginsburg&#39;s travels.&quot; The finding aid includes a &lt;a href=&quot;https://findingaids.loc.gov/db/search/xq/searchMferDsc04.xq?_id=loc.mss.eadmss.ms019019&amp;amp;_faSection=contentsList&amp;amp;_faSubsection=series&amp;amp;_dmdid=d8090e22&amp;amp;_start=1&amp;amp;_lines=125&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;list of the the collection contents&lt;/a&gt;, an &lt;a href=&quot;https://findingaids.loc.gov/db/search/xq/searchMfer02.xq?_id=loc.mss.eadmss.ms019019&amp;_faSection=indexTerms&amp;_faSubsection=controlaccess&amp;_dmdid=d8090e7&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Index &lt;/a&gt; of the creators, collectors, and other individuals and families associated with this collection, and &lt;a href=&quot;https://findingaids.loc.gov/db/search/xq/searchMfer02.xq?_id=loc.mss.eadmss.ms019019&amp;amp;_faSection=usingThisCollection&amp;amp;_faSubsection=userestrict&amp;amp;_dmdid=d8090e15&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;information&lt;/a&gt; on copyright and restrictions on use of the collection. &lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/06/library-of-congress-new-finding-aid-for.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-3723032976425268627</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-06-22T13:06:09.250-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Copyright Public Modernization Committee</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Library Of Congress</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">US Copyright Office</category><title>Copyright Public Modernization Committee announced by the Library of Congress</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The Library of Congress &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.loc.gov/item/prn-21-034/library-of-congress-announces-copyright-public-modernization-committee/2021-06-22/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;has announced&lt;/a&gt; the members of the new Copyright Public Modernization Committee (CPMC), which includes several librarians:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;table&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Name&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affiliation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Todd Carpenter&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;National Information Standards Organization&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Wahaj Chaudhry&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Susan Chertkof&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Recording Industry Association of America&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Brewster Kahle&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Internet Archive&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Roy Kaufman&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Copyright Clearance Center&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Keith Kupferschmid&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Copyright Alliance&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Melissa Levine&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;University of Michigan Library&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Pamela Malpas&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Association of American Literary Agents; Copyright Committee co-chair&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Micah May&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Digital Public Library of America&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;James Neal&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Columbia University Librarian Emeritus, ALA, ACRL&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Kathleen Rodriguez&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Warner Media&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Jeff Sedlik&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Picture Licensing Universal System (PLUS) Coalition&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Scott Weingart&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Carnegie Mellon University Libraries&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;The reason the Committee is being convened is &quot;to expand and enhance communication with external stakeholders on IT modernization of Copyright Office systems&quot; and &quot;to enhance communication and provide a public forum for the technology-related aspects of the U.S. Copyright Office’s modernization initiative.&quot;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;The first public meeting of the committee is a virtual meeting scheduled for Thursday, July 22 from 1-4 pm. The meeting is free and open to the public, but participants must&lt;a href=&quot;https://loc.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_cYWLGmi6QK-33JfrfrKS7w&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; register here in advance&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;According to the announcement,&amp;nbsp;&quot;Register of Copyrights Shira Perlmutter and Library of Congress Chief Information Officer Bud Barton will provide opening remarks and Library subject-matter experts will provide an update on the development of ECS and other modernization efforts. Attendees will have an opportunity to hear directly from CPMC members and participate in a live Q&amp;amp;A. The meeting will be recorded and made available for viewing after the event.&quot;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/06/copyright-public-modernization.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-7970322672964151009</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-06-08T07:00:00.317-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">algorithms</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">discovery</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">search</category><title>Book discusses bias in algorithms, searching, and library &quot;discovery&quot; systems</title><description>
&lt;p&gt;The beSpacific blog today &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.bespacific.com/masked-by-trust-bias-in-library-discovery/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;featured a post&lt;/a&gt; about a book titled &quot;Masked by Trust: Bias in Library Discovery&quot; by librarian Matthew Reidsma, who works at Grand Valley State University Libraries. He starts by discussing how most librarians develop, on their own, a favorite search that they use to evaluate &quot;the dizzying array of search tools that are a part of modern librarianship.&quot; But as he studied the way variations in search terms can pull up results that can vary significantly, he decided to look more closely at the inner workings of search and the sorts of biases that can happen.     &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt; For this research, I investigated four library discovery systems, with
varying degrees of access to each: Ex Libris’ Summon and Primo, OCLC’s
WorldCat Discovery, and EBSCO’s EDS...Because these systems bear a remarkable resemblance to one another, it is
easy for users to assume that they will all give the same results for similar
searches. But in fact, the combination of di#erent centralized indexes, varied collection development practices at subscribing institutions, and competing relevancy algorithms means that it is unlikely that these systems will
return the same results for the same searches.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The book is full of great examples and provides many useful&amp;nbsp; citations to other articles. It is written in plain language without a lot of technical terminology, and is available both from &lt;a href=&quot;https://litwinbooks.com/books/masked-by-trust/&quot;&gt;Library Juice Press&lt;/a&gt; and as a &lt;a href=&quot;https://matthew.reidsrow.com/files/MBT_final.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF download under a Creative Commons license&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: x-small;&quot;&gt;Hat tip: Sabrina Pacifici&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/06/book-discusses-bias-in-algorithms.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-4200194294663103619</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2021 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-06-06T13:22:00.232-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ABA. Bar Exam</category><title>Bar exams will be in person next year</title><description>&lt;p&gt;The ABA Journal &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/online-bar-exams-axed-by-ncbe-beginning-next-year?utm_medium=email&amp;amp;utm_source=salesforce_402097&amp;amp;sc_sid=01309704&amp;amp;utm_campaign=weekly_email&amp;amp;promo=&amp;amp;utm_content=&amp;amp;additional4=&amp;amp;additional5=&amp;amp;sfmc_j=402097&amp;amp;sfmc_s=50740608&amp;amp;sfmc_l=1527&amp;amp;sfmc_jb=23009&amp;amp;sfmc_mid=100027443&amp;amp;sfmc_u=11587486&quot;&gt;has an article&lt;/a&gt; titled &quot;Online bar exams axed by NCBE beginning next year,&quot; in which it reports that law school graduates planning to take the bar exam next year should expect to take the exam in person. According to the article, the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE) has announced that its test will be made available to jurisdictions only in an in-person form beginning in February 2022. The NCBE develops licensing tests for lawyers that are used by most U.S. jurisdictions. Since October 2020, states could choose either an in-person or an online exam developed by the NCBE. Twenty-nine jurisdictions are planning a remote bar exam in July, while 24 jurisdictions are planning in-person exams.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pabarexam.org/pdf/203_205/721_PABLE_Letter_to_Stakeholders.pdf&quot;&gt;Pennsylvania&lt;/a&gt; is one of the states that will administer the July 2021 bar exam remotely. &lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/06/bar-exams-will-be-in-person-next-year.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-2372154959488827367</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-06-04T13:22:30.891-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">academic libraries</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ebooks</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">libraries</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Maryland</category><title>New Maryland state law supports library e-book usage</title><description>&lt;p&gt;The Association of Research Libraries has a great (for libraries) story reporting that Maryland is the first state in the nation to enact a state law ensuring that libraries can license e-books and audiobooks under the same terms available to consumers. The law, &lt;a href=&quot;https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2021RS/bills/hb/hb0518E.pdf&quot;&gt;House Bill 518&lt;/a&gt; in the MD legislature, was enacted by the Governor on May 31. It begins: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;FOR the purpose of requiring a publisher who offers to license an electronic literary
4 product to the public to also offer to license the electronic literary product to
5 public libraries in the State on reasonable terms that would enable public libraries
6 to provide library users with access to the electronic literary product...&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;The article points out that&amp;nbsp; while the bill specifically names public libraries, academic and university  libraries will also benefit from improved terms and business practices. The Maryland public libraries expect that the legislation will cause publishers to bring down the prices they charge libraries for e-books, although some price discrimination likely will remain. Additionally, the legislation will result in Maryland public libraries obtaining access to titles now available only to consumers.

Similar legislation is pending in other state legislatures, and the adoption of the law in Maryland can be expected to accelerate this legislation.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/06/new-maryland-state-law-supports-library.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-1894135701129082436</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2021 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-05-26T15:02:28.159-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">health law</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law and health</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">legal epidemiology</category><title>Article: The “Legal Epidemiology” of Pandemic Control</title><description>&lt;p&gt;General Counsel News recently referenced an interesting article in&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2103380&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;an article in the New England Journal of Medicine&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;titled &quot;The &#39;Legal Epidemiology&#39; of Pandemic Control:&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;The centrality of law as a public health intervention has been undeniable during the Covid-19 pandemic. In just the first half of 2020, more than 1000 laws and orders were issued by federal, state, and local authorities in the United States in an effort to reduce disease transmission... It is past time for a broad recognition in our health system that law is a ubiquitous treatment, one to which hundreds of millions of people are routinely exposed. If that simple but telling analogy is accepted, a more pressing point follows: we should devote much more health research money and talent to the scientific study of the health effects of laws and legal practices (“legal epidemiology”)...&lt;br /&gt;The imperative is to scale up the infrastructure for at least three kinds of research: study of the mechanisms, effects, side effects, and implementation of laws designed to influence health, such as Covid control measures; research on how the legal infrastructure of the U.S. health system — the allocation of powers and duties, as well as limits on authority — influences the effectiveness of the system; and perhaps most important for addressing health equity, studies of how laws that may appear to have no health purposes — such as the tax code, minimum wage, and labor rules — shape the social determinants of health.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The article was authored by Scott Burris, J.D., Evan D. Anderson, J.D., Ph.D., and Alexander C. Wagenaar, M.S.W., Ph.D., affiliated with  the Beasley School of Law, Temple University (S.B.), and the Schools of Nursing and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania (E.D.A.) — both in Philadelphia; the University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville (A.C.W.); and the Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/05/article-legal-epidemiology-of-pandemic.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-409426579229810786</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-05-11T14:08:30.939-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">open access</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">open archives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">social science</category><title>University of Maryland Libraries becomes the institutional home of SocArXiv</title><description>&lt;p&gt;The University of Maryland (UMD) Libraries &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lib.umd.edu/news/2021/05/socarxiv&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;has announced&lt;/a&gt; that it has become the institutional home of SocArXiv. SocArXiv is an open archive of the social sciences that provides a free, non-profit, open access platform for social scientists to upload working papers, preprints, and published papers, with the option to link data and code. &lt;a href=&quot;https://socopen.org/welcome/&quot;&gt;SocArXiv&lt;/a&gt; is dedicated to opening up social science, to reach more people more effectively, to improve research, and build the future of scholarly communication.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: x-small;&quot;&gt;hat tip: Pat Roncevich&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/05/university-of-maryland-libraries.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-3157422371256490973</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-05-11T14:01:53.119-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">COVID-19</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">legal aid</category><title>Pittsburgh: free housing legal help available</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;WESA, Pittsburgh&#39;s NPR news channel, reports that&amp;nbsp;Pittsburgh residents can Now apply For free housing legal help. According to the report, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has announced a $1 million initiative to help renters and homeowners alike deal with housing issues like eviction and forecosure. Renters can access everything from legal advice to full courtroom representation to deal with an eviction. But the aim is to prevent evictions in the first place. To that end, the program will offer mediation between landlords and tenants. Homeowners, meanwhile, can work with a lawyer to get clear title to a home or to prevent foreclosure. Mayor Peduto said that &quot;for too many Pittsburghers during this pandemic the threat of losing homes has been a constant worry, especially for those with low incomes.”&lt;br /&gt;Those who need help can contact &lt;a href=&quot;https://renthelppgh.org/about&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;RentHelpPGH&lt;/a&gt; or the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.phdcincubator.org/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Pittsburgh Hispanic Development Corporation&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: x-small;&quot;&gt;hat tip: Karen Shephard&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/05/pittsburgh-free-housing-legal-help.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-5804719507471088833</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-04-28T18:56:36.986-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">COVID-19</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law libraries</category><title>Law Libraries after Covid</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Susannah Tredwell over at Slaw, &quot;Canada&#39;s Legal Magazine,&quot; has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slaw.ca/2021/04/28/the-post-covid-library/&quot;&gt;an interesting article&lt;/a&gt; in which she discusses the changes law libraries have undergone during the Covid pandemic, and whether these changes will stick.&amp;nbsp; How will library services be affected post-Covid? She covers several topics:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;li&gt;Death of the looseleaf?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Greater adoption of digital library resources by users, in which she points out the dramatic increase in print resources now available online as well.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Library space continues to shrink (or disappear completely?)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Greater flexibility in how publishers licence (Canadian spelling) products?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Increase in library staff working remotely.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div&gt;We are all looking forward to finding out how our law library will continue to be affected by the changes during Covid.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/04/law-libraries-after-covid.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-851045080106383064</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-03-19T17:00:04.605-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fdlp</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fugitive documents</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">unreported publications</category><title>FDLP: No more &quot;Fugitive Documents&quot; </title><description>&lt;p&gt;The Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP) &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fdlp.gov/news-and-events/4945-discontinuing-the-use-of-the-phrase-fugitive-documents?utm_source=newsletter_2492&amp;amp;utm_medium=email&amp;amp;utm_campaign=discontinuing-the-use-of-the-phrase-fugitive-documents&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;has announced&lt;/a&gt; that it is discontinuing use of the term &quot;fugitive documents&quot; to describe &quot;&lt;i&gt;Public information products that are not discoverable through the Government Publishing Office&#39;s Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP)&lt;/i&gt;.&quot;&amp;nbsp; According to the announcement, &quot;It is time to replace the phrase “fugitive documents.” Going forward LSCM will use “unreported publications.” This change was approved by the Depository Library Council, the Superintendent of Documents, and the GPO Director.&lt;br/&gt;You may notice some changes over the next several weeks as LSCM staff work to reflect this change in external and internal documentation, public facing web pages on FDLP.gov, and in askGPO. We will not replace the term in past conference presentations or in previously published articles. Our goal is to have changes completed by the end of May 2021.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/03/fdlp-no-more-fugitive-documents.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-8687136718588372077</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-03-19T08:45:04.286-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Bluebook</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice Thomas</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">United States Supreme Court</category><title>Justice Clarence Thomas &quot;goes rogue on the Bluebook&quot;</title><description>U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas recently made the headlines in both the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/justice-thomas-goes-rogue-on-the-bluebook-with-cleaned-up-citation-to-the-delight-of-appellate-lawyers?&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ABA Journal&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www-law360-com.pitt.idm.oclc.org/articles/1362962/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Law 360&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;for using what both publications termed a &quot;rogue&quot; Supreme Court citation in the opinion he wrote for&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Brownback v. King, &lt;/i&gt;141 S.Ct. 740&lt;i&gt; (&lt;/i&gt;Legal Writing Professors take note).&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;The ABA Journal says that Justice Thomas &quot;went rogue on the Bluebook when he embraced an appellate lawyer’s suggestion for dealing with &#39;citation baggage&#39;... that distracts from the point.&quot; &lt;br /&gt;What was this bold move? Justice Thomas used the suggestion to used the parenthetical &quot;(cleaned up)&quot; after a citation to denote the court&#39;s omission of quotations within quotations and the need for a quoting citation parenthetical, as dictated by Bluebook Rule 5.2. The appellate lawyer who made the suggestion in an &lt;a href=&quot;https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2935374&quot;&gt;SSRN article&lt;/a&gt; is Jack Metzler of the Federal Trade Commission. Metzler told the ABA Journal that this is a big deal, &quot;at least in the world of legal citation.&quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;separator&quot; style=&quot;clear: both;&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgeUA432BnjsOUfiVW30Hq_z_BF5LfSSqrznj4cZYnsgg2_RLvxmuHysgIGyqN5vIGdVSZW2W197IVpB_0qY1fcoeoouEISWtg_x85Q0Qij_IYYQSFUzNa_OOMzxkEKdi_x9k57mgN3ZjI/s526/Justice+Thomas.png&quot; style=&quot;display: block; padding: 1em 0px; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;img alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; data-original-height=&quot;326&quot; data-original-width=&quot;526&quot; src=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgeUA432BnjsOUfiVW30Hq_z_BF5LfSSqrznj4cZYnsgg2_RLvxmuHysgIGyqN5vIGdVSZW2W197IVpB_0qY1fcoeoouEISWtg_x85Q0Qij_IYYQSFUzNa_OOMzxkEKdi_x9k57mgN3ZjI/s320/Justice+Thomas.png&quot; width=&quot;320&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/03/justice-clarence-thomas-goes-rogue-on.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgeUA432BnjsOUfiVW30Hq_z_BF5LfSSqrznj4cZYnsgg2_RLvxmuHysgIGyqN5vIGdVSZW2W197IVpB_0qY1fcoeoouEISWtg_x85Q0Qij_IYYQSFUzNa_OOMzxkEKdi_x9k57mgN3ZjI/s72-c/Justice+Thomas.png" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-1411115375393803187</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-03-18T11:54:07.759-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">open access</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">slaw</category><title>Open Access to Research and the Covid pandemic</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slaw.ca/2021/03/16/a-pandemic-update-on-open-access-to-research/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;interesting article on Slaw&lt;/a&gt; (Canada&#39;s online legal magazine) by John Willinsky discusses growth in the Open Access movement during the past year.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;It is influencing the opening of scholarly publishing, more generally...After an initial start with two publishers, there are now, one year later, nine publishers moving away from selling traditional subscriptions to research libraries to having those same libraries pay much the same price to make this research publicly available. The growth of this model over the course of this extraordinary year has meant that what is now available to readers everywhere includes research reviews in areas of public health and cancer biology, as well as research in anthropology, water, mathematics, political economy and other areas. &lt;/blockquote&gt;And what&#39;s more, the article says, &quot;Librarians are making clear the serious consideration that some are giving to moving research and scholarship to open access.&quot; The author has embarked on an interesting project to develop usage statistics for open access articles.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/03/open-access-to-research-and-covid.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-8982262986979497976</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-03-17T12:55:07.100-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">50 state databases</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">COVID-19</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Law360</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">LexisNexis</category><title>Coronavirus Regulations State-By-State</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Law360 has an article titled &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.law360.com/pennsylvania/articles/1365379/coronavirus-regulations-a-state-by-state-week-in-review-?nl_pk=d0d38103-315a-430a-aca8-b3e6b14715e4&amp;amp;utm_source=newsletter&amp;amp;utm_medium=email&amp;amp;utm_campaign=pennsylvania&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Coronavirus Regulations: a State-by-State Review&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; The article has an interactive map of the United States (powered by LexisNexis state-net) that lets you click on any of the states or territories of the US to view legislative, regulatory, and executive order information with a link to full text reports for each measure. The site tracks federal, state, and local government activity related to coronavirus, including pending bills, new regulations, and executive orders.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/03/coronavirus-regulations-state-by-state.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-4409982588550901358</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-03-15T16:31:46.584-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Aquisitions</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">COVID-19</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">digital access</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Fastcase</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law libraries</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">NELLCO</category><title>2021 NELLCO Symposium for Law Libraries begins this Wednesday</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nellco.org/page/Symposium&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;2021 NELLCO Symposium: Uncertainty - Living with Reality. Finding Opportunity.&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;is scheduled to begin this Wednesday, with a host of interesting sessions spread out over 6 days March 17-19 and 24-26. Registration is free. The Symposium will be conducted on Zoom. Some of the sessions:&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;3/17 from 1-2 pm,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://zoom.us/j/93116208691?pwd=bWJDNmI0UGtpanBIdFFCdlZlU3Zadz09&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Best Practices for Negotiating with Vendors&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3/17 from 4-5 pm,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://zoom.us/j/91434487412?pwd=dEJqUitPK3h4Ri92QXZ0YXZxZHhtUT09&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging in Collections &amp;amp; Acquisitions &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3/18 from 1-2:30 pm,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://zoom.us/j/98135054329?pwd=VWkyZzRWaXJKZG5VQ0ttczJMMzZpdz09&quot;&gt;Back to Normal? Law Libraries After the Pandemic&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3/24 from 2:45 - 3:30 pm,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://zoom.us/j/99153397978?pwd=SkhJTTdRZUN4T0Z3Wkw2Q1h2ci90QT09&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Fight for the Right to Loan: Digital access, lending, and preservation in crisis&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Plus lots more interesting sessions, and presentations from law library vendors like Fastcase, Bloomsbury, PLI Plus, vLex, and others.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;The full program is available &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nellco.org/page/symposiumprogram&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Register &lt;a href=&quot;https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSckO1hJoTZIlPyxOzxCGYrsMRca_9rLb7Kfp9ddgZGNt8169w/viewform&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/03/2021-nellco-symposium-for-law-libraries.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250542300379350487.post-2256046376683629872</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2021-01-06T14:55:59.888-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Law360</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Law360 Pulse</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">LexisNexis</category><title>LexisNexis Launches Law360 Pulse</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/infopro/b/weblog/posts/introducing-law360-pulse-a-comprehensive-business-of-law-news-service-get-free-trial-access&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;LexisNexis has introduced&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Law360 Pulse: a comprehensive business of law news service.&quot;&amp;nbsp;Law360 Pulse is a news service that combines the journalism and research of Law360 (which was acquired by LexisNexis a few years ago) with data and analytics from Lexis. Pulse complements Law360’s legal news coverage, offering single source for comprehensive legal news. LexisNexis is offering legal professionals complimentary access to Law360 Pulse for a limited time. And the good news for us is that law school faculty and students have complimentary access to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law360.com/pulse&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Law360 Pulse&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://barcorefblog.blogspot.com/2021/01/lexisnexis-launches-law360-pulse.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Barco Reference Librarian)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>