“Elite” youth sports today

There are more “elite” and premier youth sport teams across sports than there has ever been before.  The problem, however, is when the label “elite” expands faster than the standard required to earn it, the meaning of the label erodes.  Over the last 15-20 years, club and elite programs have shifted from being very selective, development-focused teams to a large, tiered ecosystem (A/B/C teams, multiple age groups, year-round seasons).  At the center of that shift is a simple reality: more teams = more revenue.

This new “elite” sports business model rewards expansion, not restriction, and increasingly more parents are wondering if their kid really is the next potential sports star, or simply on the team because mom and dad paid for him to be there?  And to be clear, we are not talking a mere couple hundred bucks — associated fees with elite sports programs these days can quickly get into the thousands of dollars range due to:

• Tryout fees
• Seasonal dues
• Uniform/gear
• Tournament fees and travel costs, including gas, food, lodging, and other incidental fees
• Private training add-ons, including skill/position coaches, dieticians and nutritionists, strength coaches, and sport psychologists

I regularly talk to parents who are astonished by how quickly the fees add up, with increasingly more asking if it is all worth it?  Things become especially difficult when families pay a lot of money, yet see that their child is a reserve player who doesn’t play much.  Or, their child plays, but the competition doesn’t appear to be much greater than what she played against in recreation leagues.  Still, huge time and financial investments are made with hopes that the experience is worth it and will help the child maximize sport abilities, and maybe have a chance to one day play at college.

With all that said, it is important for parents to do their homework and ask important questions, including the following:

• What does it actually take to make this team?  What are the skills expected to have been mastered before joining, and what expectations should we have moving forward?
• Are kids being evaluated — or accommodated?
• Is this club developing important sport skills, or simply sustaining participation numbers for increased revenues?
• Would this roster look the same if money was not involved, or would a number of kids be cut if their parents did not have the financial means?

Final thoughts

While it is true that there are still some elite sport organizations that cater to very talented kids, we are seeing many clubs today expand to meet an increasing appetite for “elite” youth sport development programs.  This shift occurs when families who can pay big club fees, even if their child does not have the athletic skill or potential to be on the team.  As the clubs continue to grow and flourish from the influx of revenue, the on-field product continues to be watered down and more resemble a recreational sports model than it does a premier sports model.  None of this is good or bad, right or wrong, but it does add new challenges for sports parents when vetting youth sport programs, and trying to discern what program is legitimate, and what program is there just for the money.

drstankovich.com

The post The Illusion of Elite Sports: Are We Watering Down Youth Competition? appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Understanding team chemistry

To begin, it is important to note that team chemistry isn’t simply about liking each other — it’s about trusting each other enough to perform without hesitation.  Good coaches, regardless of sport or skill level, know that what is most important is that team members know and embrace their unique individual role on the team, unconditionally support one another, hustle and promote a positive attitude.  Breaking this down even more and you realize not every team member can be the star, or have the ball in their hands the most.  Team chemistry is at its highest when all team members, including reserves, understand what is asked of them and fully embrace their assignment.

While team chemistry may seem simple to develop, the reality is it takes work.  Players naturally want to play in important roles, and athletes have egos, too.  It’s also easy for team members to blame others when things aren’t going well, or allow their enthusiasm and support to waver depending on the level of team success experienced.  And how do you keep reserve players feeling that they are an important part of the team, especially when they rarely play?  Savvy coaches prepare for all of these issues and work hard to create a locker room of equality, opportunity, and relationships that develop not out of talent, but out of recognition that every player’s efforts count.

The components that enhance team chemistry, coming from a role perspective, include many different pieces with value toward team success.  There are your star players, of course, but a balanced team also has players who excel in game knowledge and wisdom, defense specialization, and enthusiasm.  When these pieces come together, and support and trust established, a balanced and equipped team is developed.  Veteran coaches know that it’s not always easy to get certain players to buy in to their role (i.e. a reserve on the team to help with depth), so they create a team environment that allows every player — regardless of role or talent — to feel as though their place on the team is every bit as important as the next player’s role.  This is achieved by first accepting that team chemistry is vital, and then working hard to empower, listen, support, and trust every player with the same degree of effort and sincerity.

Final thoughts

Jerry West, in addition to being one of the greatest basketball players ever, is also widely accepted as being one of the best sports general managers of all time (basketball and beyond).  If Jerry West thinks team chemistry is the most important variable contributing toward team success. coaches should look at their own current teams and see how they score on this scale?  Do all players feel important and respected?  Is there a high level of trust on the team?  And do players know and fully embrace their individual role?  If you checked those boxes, you’re probably doing a pretty good job at coaching!

drstankovich.com

The post Talent Alone Isn’t Enough: Why Team Chemistry Wins Championships appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Labels don’t just describe behavior — they start directing it

Labeling theory is a sociological theory that explains how being labeled can shape a person’s identity and behavior — and this is certainly true with ADHD.  Labeling theory posits that people don’t just get labeled — the label starts shaping how they are seen, treated, and how they see themselves.  Using ADHD as a mental health example, it is important that parents not use ADHD as the defining reason for every unsuccessful challenge, problem, or issue their child experiences in life — and even more important that the child not immediately glom onto ADHD as the reason why he wasn’t successful.  Once a child is regularly labeled ADHD by mom and dad, the following behaviors and outcomes often occur next:

• Adults (parents, teachers, and coaches) interpret behavior through the label, almost as though viewing the child through an ADHD prism.  “He’s not off-task, he’s ADHD.”
• Expectations shift toward the child not quite having what it takes to be successful, bringing along lower expectations for focus, discipline, and effort.
• The child sees all of this and internalizes the messaging as “This is just how I am, and my ADHD is preventing me from experiencing success.”

Over time, a label can create the very behavior it was meant to explain, and often this is where kids struggle with self-fulfilling prophecies that limit their chances for success even further.  An additional problem when using a label improperly is that it prevents an accurate appraisal, and subsequent helping strategy, from ever getting off the drawing board!  In fact, there are many important things that get missed when immediately assuming ADHD is causing all the problems, including:

• Skill deficits.  The kid has yet to learn and master the skills relating to how to multi-task, field a ground ball, tune an instrument, or take apart a small engine.
• Motivation issues.  Perhaps the kid knows how to do something, but simply isn’t motivated to do what you are asking.
• Emotional factors.  Dealing with anxiety and frustration are common obstacles for kids and adults, and not to be confused with ADHD.
• Environmental mismatch.  Sometimes kids simply get bored, be it due to a long day, nice weather outside, or poor instruction from the teacher, parent, or coach.
• Behavioral patterns.  These are learned habits that become tough to break sometimes, and can get in the way of completing a task successfully (i.e. regularly sitting in a big, comfy chair to do homework but falling asleep instead).

Final thoughts

Labels, while often helpful, can actually lead to unwanted and potentially dangerous outcomes — as in the case of labeling every shortcoming experienced by a kid as a product of his ADHD.  Mental health clinicians make diagnoses that produce labels, but they caution parents that not every behavior (or lack thereof) is directly related to the mental health label, and that not every observation should be routed through one, single explanation.  Once a label is applied, it becomes easy to explain every behavior through that one lens.  Instead of asking why is this happening, we settle for it’s because of the diagnosis.  That shortcut might feel helpful — but it often prevents us from actually understanding what the child needs.

drstankovich.com

The post ADHD for Everything? The Problem With One-Size-Fits-All Labels for Kids appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Examining online content kids regularly consume

Watch closely at the kids in your company (or adults) as they interface with their phones and you will see them entering a kind of low-effort, high stimulation “trance-like” mental state.  The content is high stimulation in the sense that it is usually fast paced and visually exciting, and with no depth, meaning, or natural stopping point, minimal cognitive effort is required — leading to trance-like mental states.  Simply put, high stimulation, low meaning content is designed to keep attention without requiring thought.

Some early research examining “brain rot” has found this video content diminishes attention and focus over time, and I expect future studies to validate these claims.  When kids mindlessly scroll, they drift into automatic behavior with reduced cognitive control, not exactly the best way to actively experience life, learn how to problem-solve, communicate more effectively with others, or improve mental health.  The “brain on scroll mode” leads to kids constantly glued to their screens because of something new, something unpredictable, or something potentially entertaining, and it is this unpredictability (similar to slot machines) that creates an unhealthy addiction to wanting more.  High dopamine, low cognitive demand, hence the very appropriate term of “brain rot.”

Furthering examination of the dangers of brain rot and we learn that kids who consume mindless content day-after-day show a reduced attention span, weakened working memory, increased impulsivity, and higher levels of anxiety.  Through these daily scrolls of nothing kids become conditioned to expect constant novelty, instant gratification, and minimal effort for maximum stimulation.  Recent studies have found heavy short video use is linked to decreased attention control, promotes instant gratification and weaker focus, and is associated with impaired attention and working memory.

It’s important to note that none of this is by accident, as social media platforms regularly use infinite scroll, autoplay, and algorithm-driven feeds to keep kids tuned in to their content.  In fact, critics call this “addictive design,” and we are even beginning to see lawsuits pertaining to these specific concerns.  In essence, kids aren’t just lacking discipline — they’re interacting with systems engineered to override it.  Parents, therefore, have a lot of work to do, beginning with the following:

• Accept that there is growing evidence that allowing your child endlessly scroll on a phone/tablet can, and likely will, lead to mental health issues and concerns.
• Ongoing psychology research is finding specific issues with how kids are impacted with their attention, focus, and cognitive processing.
• Social media platforms understand the science behind keeping people tethered to their page, and develop content specifically designed to increase user adherence.
• Since these are newer issues and concerns, researchers do not know for certain what long-term consequences occur from chronic screen scrolling (though early studies are already raising big flags).  Furthermore, assuming psychological damage occurs from high usage, even bigger questions arise as to whether kids can ever eventually recover and regain attention, focus, and cognitive abilities.

Final thoughts

With each day that passes kids spend increasingly more time with their phones, often locked in to mindless, “brain rot” content.  Researchers are examining the impact of this behavior, especially with respect to human development and mental health.  Early studies are revealing that many social media platforms design their content not to help kids develop in positive ways, but to instead keep them on their page and scrolling away for hours on end.  Parents, therefore, must be vigilant, and monitor both the content being consumed, as well as the sheer number of hours their kids spend each day mindlessly scrolling as opposed to actively living in the world around them.

drstankovich.com

The post Scrolling Over Living: The Hidden Mental Health Costs of “Brain Rot” Content on Kids appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Common characteristics of bad losers

To begin this analysis, it is important to accept that it is not because somebody “cheated” every time you lose in sports (or life).  Rarely are games “rigged,” and in 99% of competition the outcome came about because one team or competitor simply outplayed the opponent.  While losing never feels good, future positive growth can only occur when results are accepted, and the losing individual/team can review the game in order to improve.  Below are examples of poor sportsmanship that compromises healthy competition, and sets forth poor examples for kids with respect to handling adversity:

• Blaming everyone but themselves.  Poor sports tend to blame the officials, weather, field conditions, and everything else instead of simply taking responsibility for a loss.
• Emotional outbursts and poor self-control.  Yelling at officials (and possibly getting ejected as a result), dressing down players by means of humiliation, and engaging in other disrespectful behaviors while competing.
• Disrespect toward opponents.  Playing with disregard to safety, intentionally making disparaging comments toward the other team, and purposely doing things on the field to make the other team feel unworthy.
• Win at all cost mentality.  Bending rules, overlooking cheating, and pushing kids well past what would be acceptable expectations (mentally and physically).
• Inconsistent standards.  What’s good for our team isn’t good for yours, over-playing star players at expense of playing reserves, and calling out other teams/coaches for doing the same things that their team does.

While it is understandable why it’s easy to engage in poor sportsmanship since sports are an incredibly emotional experience, the behaviors listed above prevent kids from experiencing a healthy, competitive, and enriching life experience.  In fact, kids that witness consistent poor sportsmanship from their coaches and teammates are more likely to look for another team — or quit the sport altogether.  It is for these reasons that it behooves coaches to take responsibility, own losses, and model for kids that through adversity there is opportunity for growth.  The reality is that in most competitions the outcome is fair, and rarely are games “rigged” or that the opponent has cheated.

Final thoughts

Pointing your finger toward anything other than your own efforts may be comforting in the moment, but it does not reflect reality, nor does it allow for introspection to examine what needs improvement.  For kids to witness poor sportsmanship it also models to them that when you lose it’s not your fault, and that officials are anything but fair.  When kids learn that it’s never their fault, they are more likely to carry that thinking over to the classroom (i.e. blaming bad teachers), and even their future careers (i.e. they were cheated out of a promotion).

drstankovich.com

The post You Lost. Now Act Like it: Examining Healthy Sportsmanship vs Unhealthy Blame appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Comparing coaches

Great youth sport coaches can have an amazing, positive impact on the kids they coach.  Conversely, unprepared coaches can negatively impact the youth sport experience, and even drive kids to quitting if the experience isn’t fun.  In order to size up your child’s coach compare the different approaches below:

Great coaches

• Bring a positive attitude every day, are prepared, and always look for ways to make the experience fun.
• Make it a point to find ways for all kids to participate, and provide ongoing feedback to kids who do not play a lot so that they can continue to improve.
• Talk to kids about the life lessons they are learning while competing, and show them ways to apply the skills they use in sports to become a better student, friend, and future employee one day.
• Place value on the overall team experience, friendships and off-field experiences, and not solely wins and losses.

Unprepared coaches

• More or less wing it when running practices, often with no practice plan to follow.
• Plays only the best kids, and believes that youth sports should always separate kids by talent regardless of age/maturity.
• Hyper-focused on winning, with little focus on growth and learning life skills through sport participation.
• Takes on a very authoritarian approach with kids, and will not hesitate to embarrass or humiliate kids who fail or appear to not be trying their best.

People often ask me if it’s really a big deal the type of coach makes a difference, and the answer is a resounding yes!  Since only a very small percentage of kids will ever play college sports (and an even smaller number go professional), it is important that we use youth sports in the best developmental ways possible.  Great youth sport coaches place an emphasis on keeping it fun, educational, and an experience that kids will cull from the rest of their lives when faced with stress and life challenges.  Additionally, these coaches fully understand that it’s not the wins and losses, but the day-to-day moments when kids reach personal goals, cheer for one another, display integrity and sportsmanship, and learn how to handle adversity and losing.  Coaches who disregard these ideas and approaches not only miss golden opportunities to help kids grow and mature, they also usually drive kids to quitting well before they might have with a better, more tuned in coach.

Final thoughts

Great youth sport coaches take the job seriously, and they work hard to help kids grow as people, not just athletes.  These coaches have a great impact and influence on the kids they coach, and often help kids develop the self-confidence needed to excel in life far beyond the sports field.  Less prepared coaches, comparatively, tend to overly focus on winning at the expense of a more holistic experience for kids, leaving a lot of the value of youth sports behind when the games eventually end.  While you may not always be in control regarding who coaches your kid, when you do have influence, it is important to look at the big picture and seek out coaches who appreciate the importance of helping kids develop by using sports as an important, holistic life experience.

drstankovich.com

The post Behind the Whistle: What Separates Great Youth Sport Coaches From the Rest appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Athlete training today

Objectively speaking, athletes today — including young athletes — regularly outperform previous generations.  Modern day athletes run faster, jump higher, and swim at record speeds, just to offer a few easy examples.  In fact, previous athletic records once held by adults are now regularly challenged by athletes much younger, and in just about every sport that keeps records we see those records fall.  While there may be outlier athletes of the past who would likely still perform at a high level today, those are exceptions, not the norm.  So if we can agree that athletes today are generally better than athletes of the past, why is this the case, and what new problems have developed as athletes have improved?

• Better athletes, but narrower athletes.  Many kids today specialize (only play one sport) in sports early and become quite good — at that one sport.  This approach to sport participation leaves kids vulnerable to sport burnout, and overuse physical injuries.
• The professionalization of childhood.  Year-round seasons, professional coaches, rankings, social media exposure, and recruiting pressure.  This new paradigm for kids creates adult-level pressure for them, an identity exclusively tied to sport performance, and a lot less room for failure.
• Injuries are no longer just “bad luck.”  Sport injuries today are more systemic than they are random.  Overuse injuries like ACL tears and stress fractures occur largely due to the growing number of games played each year coupled by the lack of rest, downtime, and no off-season.
• Sport burnout is a feature, not a bug.  Sport burnout is no longer an anomaly, but is expected at some point in your child’s youth sport career.  Constant pressure and emotional fatigue leads to loss of intrinsic motivation and eventual premature quitting.
• The illusion that more = better.  Does more games, more reps, and more travel always lead to positive outcomes?  The science doesn’t support this approach, as development does not scale linearly but instead in conjunction with rest, variation, and unstructured play.
• Economic and social costs.  Youth sports have essentially become “pay-to-play.”  Travel leagues, private coaching, club fees, and ongoing equipment replacement have created have/have not scenarios that impact what kids get to compete.
• Identity foreclosure.  Kids who only see themselves as athletes and their only future path as college and pro sports set themselves up for future stress, depression, and anxiety constantly battling to be one of the top 2% who ever make it that far.
• Short-term gains vs. long-term development.  Winning now, making the top team, and getting exposure can negatively effect a kid’s long-term development and love of the game.
• Less unstructured play.  Less pickup games in exchange for more structure impacts kids and how they freely interact with others, experience sports with less pressure, and improve social relations by playing for the love of playing, not just to eventually earn a college scholarship.

To be clear, not everything is doom-and-gloom and problematic in sports, but there is also little argument that kids today experience a very different, intense, and less forgiving sport environment than their parents.  In an ideal situation, kids vary their routines, play for the love of playing, embrace life skills learned through sports, and create friendships and experiences for a lifetime.  If a child has athletic talent, then he or she will almost inevitably be noticed and likely have some college opportunities presented.  Unfortunately, what I just described is a fading memory of previous generations being exchanged for a hyper-competitive, pro sport focus for increasingly more kids.

Final thoughts

There is little argument that, generally speaking, athletes today are better than athletes of the past.  The question, however, is whether the means and approaches used to develop better athletes today offsets the growing number of serious issues and concerning trends witnessed as a result?  Is it worth it to see better athletes, when at the same time far more young athletes today are suffering serious physical injuries and experiencing an increase in sport burnout?  Like with most things in life there are trade-offs, and this is certainly the case when it comes to youth sports and how young athletes maximize their sports training.

drstankovich.com

The post Faster, Stronger… and More Broken? The Trade-Offs of Modern Athlete Development appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Today might be the best day of your life (you just don’t know it)

If you have spent time in my company, you may have heard me say that today might be the best day of your life, but you just don’t know it.  In fact, I often say this around kids playing youth sports as I watch them having fun, sharing laughs, and making memories for a lifetime.  Of course, kids don’t know how today is any more important than any other day as they haven’t lived a long enough life to allow for perspective, but we as adults know what it can mean contributing to a team, and being accepted by teammates.  In fact, for many adults, it is only years later that we look back on moments that, at the time, we took for granted.

The best days of our lives are the moments that are tough — if not impossible — to relive.  It’s the first soccer goal, the base hit that won the game, and the moment someone inspired you to push harder, do more, or contribute to something truly special.  It’s someone showing a special interest in you, it’s being recognized for a big accomplishment, and it’s the feeling of connection we experience when we reach out to help someone.  These moments make our lives what they are, and contribute directly to our level of happiness and life satisfaction.  Sadly, too often we take these moments for granted until someone or some thing reminds us, and then we put it all together how special that trip to Dairy Queen was after winning the league championship that year.

Maybe it’s that warm summer day, or brief rain that came out of nowhere, where you just sat with your kid, or a friend, or maybe someone you simply met by chance, that led to a remarkable discussion that literally redirected the trajectory of your life.  A career you just learned about, or a networking opportunity that resulted in the job you always wanted.  Maybe that brief chat over a cup of coffee with a friend turned out to be the most influential 10 minutes of your life, even if you didn’t know know it then.

Sometimes in life we find ourselves sad, upset, or dealing with great adversity, and we need someone or something to turn to for support.  It is in these moments that we can benefit through the product of time and history the importance of our most fond moments and days of life, and those memories can be used again in a variety of healing ways.  Every self-discovery, new idea, and different way of looking at things likely began with a conversation, or a moment someone special empowered you to keep going.  These are the times that help define our happiness, health, and life satisfaction.

Final thoughts

There are countless moments in life that truly shape who we are, how we think, and what we do.  Sadly, many of these moments are not recognized at the time, and usually are not appreciated until years later when we have proper perspective to understand the value.  The next time you feel something special happening, sit back and enjoy the moment, and take in everything special that you are experiencing.  You don’t need to make sense of what is happening, but instead simply appreciate that you could be having one of the best days that you will ever have in your life.

drstankovich.com

The post The Day You Didn’t Notice: Finding Meaning in the Moments We Overlook appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

You are not vulnerable to “chemical imbalances”

Due largely to the work of professors Joanna Moncrieff and Mark Horowitz we now know there is no clear evidence that serotonin levels or serotonin activity are responsible for depression.  Think about that for a moment, it’s not that your brain suddenly went haywire and serotonin acted unpredictably to the point of being medicated to get back to “balance,” but instead far more likely that any depression you have ever experienced was likely brought on by life events and situations, coupled by the ways in which you coped with the accompanying stress.  While it may feel better to think that depression is this thing that occurs randomly and that we have no control over (and therefore no personal responsibility for experiencing), the reality is that depression is a product of how we perceive situations, our coping skills, and our resilience.  When we frame depression that way (accurately), it puts more of the depression on us and how we deal with life, rather than how the drug companies had us thinking that basically “you’re doomed, and only we can help.”

Depersonalizing mental health issues might help us cope in the short run, but introducing potentially dangerous psychotropic drugs can — and often does — create an entirely new and even more serious set of problems.  Don’t believe me?  Tune in closely to the next drug ad you see on tv and take note of the potential side effects that go on and on and on…..it’s actually hard to believe any of these drugs get approved when you take a close look at all the things that can go wrong.  Rather than search for a theory without legs (i.e. the chemical imbalance theory), a much better way to go is to learn better coping, and using professional assistance when needed.

Turning attention toward yourself and how you may have gotten to a depressed mental status can be scary, but buying into theories with no credibility is even worse.  In fact, by knowing that your brain is not damaged, nor that you are the unfortunate recipient of flawed genetics, allows you to quickly move from an “I’m doomed” mindset to a more empowered approach to self-improvement.  No pills needed, but instead a recognition that a mood change has occurred, and that you have the ability to correct the situation through your own personal efforts and not an ongoing prescription of SSRI drugs.

It is important to note that improving mood state is not easy, regardless of what caused the depression.  Working everyday to feel better is challenging work, and there are plenty of moments of hopelessness that often occur along the way.  Depression is very serious, but it is also very important to get it right when assessing why depression occurs, and the best methods to improve mood state.  When we erroneously accept that depression is created by uncontrollable, genetic “chemical imbalances” of serotonin, the first thing we do is immediately stop trying to improve our condition.  After all, why would you try to get better if you are convinced depression is completely out of your control?  We compound matters when we then use potentially dangerous SSRI drugs in exchange for other more authentic and efficacious approaches, including therapy, support groups, and exercise.

Final thoughts

While assuming depression is caused by uncontrollable, genetic chemical imbalances takes the onus of responsibility away from individuals, it’s also not backed up by science.  What this means is that we are responsible for our well-being, and that we have a lot more control than some would think when it comes to our mental health.  While the drug companies would like for you to think improved mental health is beyond your personal control and can only be experienced through their drugs, scientific research says the exact opposite, and shows that our human perception and means for coping with stress are what actually mediates our wellness.  Marketing is one thing, science is another, and with drug companies sometimes blurring the lines it is more important than ever that we become vigilant, critical consumers when it comes to our mental health.

drstankovich.com

The post When Marketing Masquerades as Science: How “Chemical Imbalance” Shaped Modern Mental Health appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

AI versus human therapy

If you have ever played around with AI, then you know how easy it is to forget you are actually communicating with a computer, and not a real human.  AI can be very polite, conversational, and knowledgeable — but can AI help with real mental health challenges?  While millions of people worldwide receive mental health assistance from trained, licensed clinicians, we are witnessing some people replace human therapy with AI mental health assistance.  Is this a good thing, or does AI actually compound mental health issues that might have been resolved by using a trained human instead?

One problem with AI is that it lacks clinical judgement.  AI does not understand language, but instead predicts language patterns — a very different approach compared to human therapy.  AI is also problematic when assessing and managing risk — including self-harm and suicidal ideation — by missing important, yet subtle, warning signs.  While a real clinician is trained to watch for important signs of distress, AI overlooks those indicators, resulting in potentially dangerous situations.

Another problem with AI is that no therapeutic relationship forms between computer and client, as compared to the dynamic that develops in a human therapeutic relationship.  A therapeutic alliance allows for trust and empathy to develop, factors closely associated with positive therapeutic outcomes.  Additional concerns relating to AI therapy include misdiagnosis, as well as oversimplification of complex mental health conditions, factors that can lead to improper, unhealthy, or dangerous treatments.

A final consideration when comparing AI to human therapy has to do with the uniqueness of the support provided.  With AI, advice is general, relies on patterns, and misses individual nuance.  Human therapy, by contrast, is personalized, adaptive, and evolves over time.  Human therapists also track progress over time, adjust treatment, and coordinate care, whereas AI does none of those things.

Final thoughts

AI can simulate conversation, but it cannot replace clinical judgement, human connection, or responsibility for care.  Human therapy is about facilitating change, not just giving advice, as is often the case with AI.  Yes, AI can be useful with some things relating to mental health support, including psycho-education, journaling prompts, and providing a sense of low-level support, but using AI exclusively to assist with mental health issues is not advised, and can even lead to new and more serious concerns.

drstankovich.com

The post Artificial Intelligence vs. Human Therapy: What’s at Stake for Mental Health? appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Is this an ideal summer?  Truthfully, that question is impossible to answer before fully understanding the role of athletics in your child’s life.  For a very select few kids, the summer I just described could lead to eventual positive outcomes by means of a future college athletic scholarship, and even a pro sport opportunity.  In these examples the kids have exceptional athletic talent, clear goals, family support, and strong motivation.  But what about all the other kids playing sports (the vast majority)?  Does the hyper-committed schedule work the same for them?  This group includes kids who simply play sports for fun, with talent that ranges from a little below to a little above average.  Is this the best way to spend a summer, or would a more balanced approach that includes non-sport experiences and activities be a better choice?

Selecting summer sport schedules

Should all kids today play on professional sport schedules?  Absolutely not!  But this is trend we are seeing today, where increasingly more kids are signing up for “elite” sport organizations (often in name only) and playing a ton of games.  Breaking this schedule down, however, shows that kids who follow this pattern often deal with the following concerns:

• A super-busy schedule that leaves little time for anything else.
• Increased chances for sport-related injuries, including serious injuries like concussions and ACL tears.
• Varying playing time, as club/elite teams are supposed to have many other talented kids, leaving only so many opportunities to play (compared to recreation leagues where kids get a ton of playing time).
• Mental health concerns, including anxiety and undeveloped stress coping to deal with new stressors.
• Sport burnout, almost guaranteed to occur at some point as kids simply aren’t wired to play a adult professional sport schedule.

Sure, flexing on the fact that your child plays on an elite team may be cool, but is that experience truly delivering on the needs of your child?  Yeah, the uniforms are flashy, but how is that adding to your child’s sport skill set?  When you talk to experts, including former players and coaches, they will almost always tell you that the best thing you can do for your child and sports is to keep it fun, and find as many opportunities as possible to get reps and develop fundamentals.  As your child enjoys the sport and gets better, then look for advanced opportunities to improve — but really work on those fundamentals first!

Another way you might look at it using an academic example — your child would not go from Introduction to Math right into Advanced Calculus, as there are many incremental steps between basic and advanced math.  Similarly, sport skill advancement is scaled the same way, with the ideal approach being to master the basics, then move up a step at a time to allow for skill mastery and greater self-confidence.  When families chase swag, travel, and prestige, they may be missing out on the real experiences needed to reach maximum athletic potential.

Final thoughts

At the end of the day when it comes to youth sports, kids need reps, not frequent flier miles.  While it is exciting to feel the hype of a so-called big name program, if your kid doesn’t get to play a lot you may actually be setting your kid back, not forward.  Additionally, playing a ton of games over a summer can leave your child at much greater risk for serious injuries, sport burnout, and even premature quitting — things that will quickly curtail your child’s fun and investment into sports.  Finally, fun keeps kids playing sports, and confidence is what motivates them to play harder — putting too much on kids too early can zap the fun, and leave them on the bench watching better skilled kids play instead of them.

drstankovich.com

The post Chasing the Dream or Missing Childhood? The Reality of Youth Sports Today appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Imprinting and critical periods of development

Have you ever watched ducklings walk in sequence behind their mother?  Aside from it being quite cute to observe, it also serves as evidence of the importance of ducklings learning early in their lives the value of following mom.  Even more interesting, scientists have learned that this process, called imprinting, is a time-sensitive experience for ducks to attach — and once passed, can never be recovered in quite the same way.  When ducklings fail to properly imprint, many adverse things can happen, including:

• failing to develop normal social and mating behaviors,
• attaching to inappropriate objects (including people and other animals that are not ducks), and
• struggling to function normally as adults since they never developed in the same, normative ways as other ducklings.

For humans, psychologists have learned that we experience a similar sensitive period where we are prime to learn invaluable life skills.  Just like ducklings, there are windows in development where the human brain is especially receptive to certain experiences, including language development, attachment, social skills, and emotional development.

We know that when kids fail to fully develop during these sensitive periods, unwanted consequences often follow.  For example, if language is not developed during a sensitive period, some kids never fully develop grammar, and often struggle with communication long-term.  When attachment fails to develop during a sensitive period, kids can be later challenged with trust issues, emotional regulation, and social functioning.  Lastly, when kids miss out on social interactions (i.e. playing video games alone for chunks of their teen years) there is evidence that kids lag behind on reading facial expressions, tone of voice, body language, conflict resolution, and empathy.

While there is little debate on the significance of human sensitive periods and the impact on life skills development, there are still questions whether humans can later make up for these periods when they are missed?  Social skills are not simply downloaded form the internet, but they develop during important life periods where kids can trial-and-error things, make mistakes, and learn from others.  If, however, kids glom on to their phones and play hours and hours of video games through their formative years, serious concerns arise that they may never be able to recapture what was missed in terms of life skill development.

Early research on sensitive periods and human development show that when early experiences are limited, social skills may eventually develop later, but less efficiently.  Individuals may also show social awkwardness, difficulty reading cues, emotional dysregulation, and weaker communication skills.  While it appears as though the brain can still learn social skills, it is no longer operating in its most optimal learning window, leaving individuals less developed than they would be had they maximized sensitive periods during development.

Final thoughts

There is definitely a developmental cost to missing invaluable life experiences during sensitive periods, and increasingly more kids today are becoming vulnerable to developmental issues due to high-volume usage of technology (i.e. smart phones and gaming).  In essence, many young people are currently growing into adulthood with limited experience reading body language, verbal communication, and self-regulation largely due to choosing technology over real life human interactions.  As we continue to interface with technology (including artificial intelligence), it is important for parents and teachers to realize the potential psychological damage that can occur when kids replace real-life interactions with stationary phone and video screens.

drstankovich.com

The post Screens vs. Social Skills: What Happens Developmentally When Kids Interact Less in Real Life? appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Robots over humans?

Should Major League umpires be worried about their future?  If I were an ump, I sure would be, as it is clear that the ABS system offers distinct advantages over the human eye, leaving umpires at a huge disadvantage.  In fact, as MLB rolls out the new challenge system, umpires are being regularly humbled each game when their calls are overturned on the in-stadium scoreboard for everyone to see.  Keep in mind umpires are very proud of their job, as all MLB umpires go through rigorous umpire school, and are required to log years of minor league games before ever getting to call a big league game.  Now, for the first time, that credibility and respect are being cast aside — not exactly the best way to empower your employees.

The ABS system, depending on how it is received this year, could soon take the place of human umpires entirely and dramatically alter the game.  New technologies currently allow for absolute precision with balls and strikes, and could soon be responsible for foul ball accuracy, and bang-bang calls on close calls on the bases.  Do we want a future game where there are no human umpires on the field, but instead cameras, sensors, and other technology tools officiating the game?  A game where animated umpire calls that add spirit to the game are replaced by monotone, mechanical output decisions delivered with no feeling?

All of this brings me to my final big question — is it perfection we are after, or does the subjective nature of human decision-making add the most to the game?  The truth is MLB umpires get about 99% of the calls correct (an amazing feat in itself), and the times they do miss often adds flavor to the game by means of crowd involvement, on the fly coaching decisions, and even manager-umpire on-field disputes that bring energy to the game.  Replacing all of that with a boring graphic on the big screen showing a baseball hitting a corner of the strike target might get the call right, but lose a lot of the human component that makes baseball a great American game that has endured for over 150 years.

Final thoughts

Often when new technologies emerge, we quickly forget what we just had, and the value of what is being replaced.  There is no doubt that the efficacy of ABS calls are better than human umpires, but does adding this kind of element to the game add, or take away from, the subjective nature of baseball?  While some fans are adamant that getting it right is always better than a human umpire missing a call, critics worry about adding too much technology, minimizing the value of human umpires, and the overall effect of replacing the energy that real umpires bring in exchange for bland, non-feeling computer evidence.

drstankovich.com

The post The End of Human Officiating? MLB’s ABS System and the Future of Sports appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Jeffrey “The Dude” Lebowski

These days, we hear expressions like “fake news” and “alternative facts,” but what do people really mean when they say these things?  It seems that a lot of what people call “fake” news is really just news they don’t like, and “alternative” facts are not necessarily facts, but alternative opinions of what the person wished were the case.  As people argue what is and isn’t fake about the news we receive, it seems as though the bigger point that needs attention is helping people understand the difference between objective facts and subjective opinions.  For example, something isn’t fake simply because you don’t like it, and just because you don’t like something doesn’t mean you should dream up some alternative that you call a “fact.”

Understanding objective and subjective information

It is important to first define terms before providing examples of objective and subjective perspectives.  When we make an  objective comment, the claim can be confirmed or assumed independently of any minds, and means evaluating situations, data, or information based on facts and verifiable evidence rather than personal feelings, biases, or opinions.  Examples of objective statements include:

• It is 56 degrees outside.
• The Tigers beat the Bears 35-14.
• A student received an 85% on the math exam.
• The new car just parked in the dealership showroom is painted navy blue with an off-white color leather interior.

As you can see from the examples above, it’s “just the facts” when it comes to objective reporting.  Now, let’s take the same 4 examples and offer a subjective opinion based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions:

The next time you hear objective news that you don’t like (i.e. someone you know lost a school board election), you are welcome to offer a subjective opinion about the news, but try to refrain from calling what you don’t like as “fake.”  Instead, first recognize the objective news (someone you know lost the election), and then, if you want, offer a subjective opinion about the news (“I know him, and he would have been a real asset to the board.  Unfortunately, he lost.”).  These kinds of exchanges allow for a common denominator to be established (the results), leaving plenty of room for subjective discussion to follow (he would have been the best board member had he won!).  This type of communication is healthy and allows room for varying opinions, but is based on objective reality that people can verify without bias.

Final thoughts

It is important that we not blur the lines when it comes to objective and subjective views of information — and the good news is there is room for both!  You can accept that your team lost a game, and still have an opinion as to why they lost.  You can accept a grade on a test, and freely offer your thoughts on the quality of the instructor.  When we fail to acknowledge facts (objective evidence), we lose the opportunity to begin discussion around a central, agreed upon piece of evidence that allows for differences of opinion.  Bypassing truth, however, immediately sends us to subjective arguments without a place of consensus, making it near-impossible for fruitful discussion and future growth.

drstankovich.com

The post Critical Thinking in the Age of “Fake News” and “Alternative Facts” appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

A heuristic worth exploring

In psychology, a heuristic is known as a rule or piece of information used in or enabling problem-solving or decision-making, also known as a mental shortcut.  We use heuristics all the time, and often — but not always — they help us with decisions.  Take the following heuristics as examples:

• If something is expensive, it is of good quality.  While this is often the case, it is not always the case.  For example, generally speaking, more expensive cars and computers provide more by means of ease of computing ability and driver perks (equating to better quality).  We also know that not all expensive things are better, as many clothing brands are expensive, but they do not use better materials.  Instead, these companies rely on branding that has been established as high-end, creating an illusion of being better than the competition.
• If something is rare (or scarce), it must be expensive.  Again, some things that are scarce are of greater value, including items that are no longer produced and hard to find.  But not everything that is rare is valuable — if I gave you the only purple paperclip in the world today, it would not have any greater value than other non-purple paperclips even though it is rare.

For psychologists, a contemporary heuristic may be developing in real time, and that is the following:

If someone is a popular influencer online, they must also be of great knowledge and expertise.

Similar to previously established heuristics, the statement above does have some truth to it, as there are some online personalities known as influencers who really are experts in their respective fields.  For example, if there is an emergency room doctor hosting a podcast on how to immediately treat an injury while waiting on an ambulance, we should all pay attention.  But what about the majority of podcasters who are simply, well, popular?  I’ll steer clear of naming names, but I’m sure you can guess a few of them pretty quickly, people who have become influencers online, but have no credible expertise on many of the subjects they opine about daily.

I mean no disrespect by this, but the fella online telling you how to do your hair and makeup — unless he’s also trained in medicine — should not be telling you what you should do about vaccines.

When it comes to medicine, science, engineering, and other important fields that require education and experience before one can claim “expertise,” it is important that we not grant equivalent expertise to online personalities simply because they have a big following.  Perhaps the new heuristic should be much simpler and straightforward: If your favorite online personality has a lot of followers, it simply means he or she has a big following.  HARD STOP!  Having a big online presence means exactly and only that…it does not mean the person is a legitimate expert in anything at all other than drumming up a following.

Final thoughts

As we increasingly live more of our lives online, popular influencers are being seen as experts — and often for things they know little about.  Engaging, polarizing, confident figures tend to command a lot of attention, but is the advice they are spewing of any value?  Or, worse yet, is it dangerous?  Good for influencers who have learned how to make a great living capitalizing off the internet, but use great caution when assuming if they have a big audience, they must know a lot about a lot of stuff.

drstankovich.com

The post When Fame Replaces Expertise: The Rise of the Influencer Authority appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Contrasting how different groups of people use AI

If you have played around with AI, you already know how fun and addicting it can be to use.  While not always perfectly accurate, AI can produce information in mere seconds that previously took us hours, days, and weeks to find.  This ease and quickness of delivery is incredibly useful to different audiences for different reasons, and herein lies the concern.

When experts use AI to enhance learning, the results are usually very positive.  For example, if an auto mechanic plugs in your car’s symptoms into AI and quickly determines the root of your car’s problems, that’s great!  Similarly, an attorney who can acquire case studies in half the time saves you money as a client, and a physician using AI to better understand the newest research about a specific health condition might become more efficient in the ways she treats you and your similar symptoms.  Business leaders can crank out powerpoint presentations in a fraction of the time they used to, thereby leaving them more time to lead!  There are literally countless ways for experts to build on their knowledge base by using AI, allowing them to be more efficient by saving time, energy, and money.

Now onto the bad news — not everybody uses AI in these ways.  Perhaps the most concerning setting right now is in education, as young people today now have the most powerful tool ever, and the ability to use AI in exchange for their own thinking whenever they want.  Having no (or little) foundation of knowledge before AI to build upon, increasingly more students today are simply typing into AI what they need to turn in to their teacher.  “Write me a 1,000 word paper on the extinction of dinosaurs” or “What is the answer to this calculus problem?” or “Summarize the book To Kill a Mockingbird into a presentation I can give the class.”  In many cases students come away with the grade they want, but they couldn’t tell you one thing about dinosaur extinction, the calculus problem, or what To Kill a Mockingbird was about.  How is this helpful in any meaningful way beyond simply getting an undeserved grade in a class?

Students will always be incentivized and rewarded to make high marks in school, and AI is the fastest way to make the grade (and save time and effort).  For younger people who need a grade more than they need the feeling of satisfaction from doing hard, scholarly work, it’s easy to see why more and more students everyday are leaning into AI rather than put in the work.  With just a few keystrokes, an entire paper can be written — compare that to the old way of doing things by going to the library, perusing articles, reading those articles, and then synthesizing what was learned into a neat, coherent, grammatically-correct paper.  What do you think most student s are going to do?  Sure, they might not have a clue relating to the paper they just turned in, but they got the grade — and at this point in their life the grade is a lot more important than developing things like “critical thinking.”  What most young people don’t realize is that there will be a day when they need to actually use what they are going to school for, and AI won’t be able to make up for all that lost learning in just a query or two.

Ironically, with experts (defined loosely here as people who have some kind of working knowledge of a topic) AI can be used in amazing, efficient, and helpful ways.  The contrast between the student simply needing a paper written, and an expert using AI to save time and be better at his job, could not be more dramatic.  Same tool (AI), but used in completely different ways.

Final thoughts

We are currently witnessing a very interesting trend with how different people use artificial intelligence, and their patterns are based on different ages and needs.  For established people already having a knowledge base in a specific subject, AI helps with speed, efficiency, and establishing the best practices to do their job.  For younger people not yet in their careers, grades are the most important thing, and AI can write papers and complete homework assignments in mere seconds.  Whether or not the student understands what he just completed using AI does not seem to matter, only that he got a good grade on the assignment.  While it’s relatively easy to see why different people use AI in different ways, it is more than concerning that younger people may be left very unprepared and untrained for the future from using AI solely to make the grade.

drstankovich.com

The post AI as a Tool—or a Crutch? The Growing Divide in How We Use Artificial Intelligence appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Are gambling ads more dangerous that cigarette ads?

I was only a baby in 1971, so I don’t know the specific conversations that were had leading to the banning of cigarette ads on television and radio.  What I do know is that as a kid of the 1970’s it was well known by then that cigarettes caused cancer, and that chronic smoking contributed to all kinds of respiratory issues and other health concerns.  What led to the decision to ban smoke ads is unclear, but we can assume society at-large saw a tip in the scale from cigarettes being harmless and fun, to something very toxic and worth banning advertising.

While sports gambling addiction doesn’t have the same background story, nor does it lead to lung cancer, it is every bit as potentially dangerous in different, less visible ways.  No, you won’t see a gambling addict hacking away coughing while taking a drag of a smoke, but you often will see that individual high or drunk, depressed and anxious, and losing large sums of money that can lead to divorce, arrest, and incarceration — or even homelessness.  Yes, the path to lung cancer from smoking may be a direct straight line, but if you look closely you can see a fairly clear pattern of the very serious dangers of gambling addiction, too.

Cigarette ads used to be cool, with cowboys on the range taking a drag while herding cattle.  Sports gambling ads, while rarely western-themed, also present a sense of coolness — as well as great jubilation when hitting on that big bet!  These sports gambling ads do lead to more gambling addiction, especially with young men with brains not yet fully developed.  And even if you just want to watch a game without sports gambling ads, you can’t do that in this moment, as literally every big sporting event today includes non-stop sports gambling ads at every turn.  What I am saying is sports gambling ads are everywhere, and these ads are most definitely impacting millions of vulnerable people who can’t get away from them so long as they want to watch sports on television.

Perhaps the reason (beyond the money in advertising) that sports gambling ads are not banned yet is due to the subtle nature of unhealthy consequences that follow.  Unlike the effects of smoking that are painfully easy to see when someone has emphysema or cancer, you don’t always “see” depression, substance abuse, failed marriages, suicidal ideation, and bankruptcy.  The consequences of sports gambling addiction, while very serious, don’t usually present as dramatic, nor is the line as direct with cause-effect.  Are those the reasons why sports gambling ads continue to flourish in this moment?

Sports gambling advertisements have definitely changed the ways in which we watch sports on television, with critics arguing they are tired of seeing the ads non-stop.  The bigger problems, however, have less to do with being annoyed and more to do with the effects that these ads have on gambling, addiction, and the serious mental health and related problems that follow.  Is it finally time to take a closer look at scaling back on these ads — or banning them altogether, as we did with cigarettes?

Final thoughts

In just the last 5 years we have gone from no sports gambling ads on television, to sports gambling ads about parlays, odds, prop bets, and over/under’s at every turn.  This change has been very dramatic, and has invited millions of people who never gambled to try an “easy” first bet, one that many of the casino’s will even allow “on them.”  Sports betting can be fun, especially with that first big win!  But what happens after that, as the odds stack against you and the sports bet losses add up?  The ads keep playing and you keep trying to get back, but the very real consequences of losing money lead to all kinds of new problems you never had, including mental health, marital, and financial issues.   Will there soon be a correction made, one where these ads are limited — or eliminated altogether?  It happened once before with cigarettes, will it happen with sports gambling ads?

drstankovich.com

The post Cigarette Ads Were Banned in 1971—Should Sports Gambling Ads Be Next? appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

One game.

If we played them ten times, they might win nine.
But not this game.
Not tonight.
Tonight, we skate with them.
Tonight, we stay with them.
And we shut them down because we can!

– Herb Brooks, 1980 USA Olympic Hockey Coach

The quote above from  Herb Brooks reminds us of the importance of a winning mindset, and how success in sports (and life) often happens as a result of healthy, positive, successful thinking.  For youth sport coaches, and really coaches at all levels, a big challenge is getting the team to buy-in that they can win today — especially on days where they are clear underdogs.  When I work with athletes I see the same thing — some go into competition always thinking they have a chance, while others have lost the game even before it has started because of their own negative, pessimistic thinking.  The Herb Brooks speech is special for many reasons, but there is a specific part of his message that is especially useful for coaches trying to maximize team abilities, and win games that others think are unwinnable.

Just win one…

“If we played them ten times, they might win nine.  But not this game. Not tonight.”  While some might read that part of the Brooks speech as simple coach rah-rah pump up stuff, there is a much stronger and important point he is making that can be leveraged for increased focus, motivation, and resiliency:

We only have to win ONE.

So often in life we become overwhelmed at the prospect of achieving success at what looks like a massive, daunting task (like how the 1980 USA hockey team felt about the Russians).  In these moments, energy deflates, attitude goes negative, and a survival mindset takes the place of healthy physical play.  Athletes play to not lose, rather than to win.  This all makes logical sense when you believe that there is no way to win today — and this is exactly the place where great coaches know to intervene and challenge their team.  Why not us today?  Sure, they may have a better team on paper, but what if we give it everything we have, and then keep coming back for more?  What if the first time they hit us, we hit them back three-fold?  What if we weren’t in awe of them, but instead saw this game as the biggest challenge of our life?  And that we only have to win it once!

You don’t have to be an Olympic coach to motivate your team in the same way that Herb Brooks did, but as a coach you do have the same task Brooks had when he coached, and that is the task of getting your team fully ready to play.  Especially with social media today, everybody knows who is good, but it is the job of a great coach to help players see past the noise, believe in themselves, and do the job today better than ever before.  You only have to win today.  How do you create a positive attitude, focus on every play, and get back up faster than the opponent anytime we hit the ground?  How do we win the “game within the game” today?

The mental game in sports often comes down to who wants it more, you or the opponent?  If you are at a clear disadvantage on paper, how do you outwork them?  How do you play together as a team today, like a fine-tuned engine?  How do you keep going, especially when you get beat on a play, or a referee makes a terrible call?  How hungry are you for success??  By focusing on these questions and dedicating efforts to improve where shortcomings exist, you will give yourself a great chance at success today — and many times in sports that is all that is needed!

Final thoughts

In life, we often lose any chance for future success the very moment we size up the competition as “impossible,” and this mindset is one that we create entirely on our own.  If we instead break down what at first looks intimidating into more realistic framing, we begin to see we may very well have a chance today.  How does this change in thinking happen?  One way, as Herb Brooks pointed out, is to simply win today, and not be consumed by anything else — including how talented the opponent is on paper.  Yes, they might beat you just about every time out, but if you bring your A-game today you might be shocked at the results.  Don’t believe me?  Go ask the 1980 USA Hockey team how they feel about putting it all together for one big game.

drstankovich.com

The post Miracles Start with Belief: The Mental Edge Behind Great Upsets in Sports appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

The professionalization of interscholastic sports

Today’s youth and interscholastic sports often mirror what we see in college and pro sports — nice, new training facilities and sport venues, field turf, state-of-the-art weight rooms, and branding and social media at every turn.  In fact, in nearly every state today high school student athletes are permitted to cash in on Name, Image, & Likeness (NIL) money, just like college athletes.  While there are a lot of similarities between interscholastic and college/pro sports, there are some really big, important differences that need to be recognized in order to better protect kids.

• These are kids. It is shortsighted to assume kids can handle the same sport and life pressures that college and pro athletes experience, and this is especially true when it comes to how kids identify and cope with stress.  Expecting kids to compete vigorously year-round in an experience that feels more like a serious job than it does a fun sport experience really puts kids in vulnerable situations, and many struggle with mental health issues as a result.
• Their role is not that of elite athlete.  While most pro and elite college athletes self-identify as “athlete” (often exclusively), most kids do not self-ascribe in this way.  In fact, unlike adult athletes, many kids play sports simply because they are good — but they are not necessarily married to this role.  This disconnect in assumption can leave kids in a real bind when they just want to play sports for fun, while others see them branded as “athlete.”
• They rarely have a say, and this can lead to distress.  For many kids, they don’t have a lot of say in their sport experience — mom and dad sign them up, pay for extra training, and if the kid is good they can deeply invest in youth sports.  When kids feel as though they don’t have a say it can lead to a lot of distress, and without support it can lead to isolation, depression, anxiety, and even self-harm.
• Resources are tough to find, especially alone.  When kids feel as though they can’t ask for time off, or feel stuck that they can’t quit sports for fear of letting important people down, they often struggle trying to figure it all out on their own.  Parents are usually the best place to start for a kid dealing with a problem, but how can you go to mom or dad when they are the ones with big sport expectations?
• Youth and interscholastic sports simply aren’t D1 or pro sports, nor should it feel like that.  Lets be honest, while it’s cool to see youth and interscholastic sport improve with the times, many people still like the innocence and organic nature of school and community sports.  The fact of the matter is that no matter how many games you add to a travel schedule, it is not professional sports — nor should it be.  Instead, allow kids to grow, laugh, struggle, and fail, as it’s the life lessons learned and the friendships gained that are the true rewards of youth and interscholastic sports.

Final thoughts

While all kids are vulnerable to mental health issues, student athletes experience some very unique stressors that are sometimes overlooked.  The sport intensity, personal identity, expectations from others, and social media implications are a few examples of issues and challenges young athletes face, and often struggle when trying to find help.  Remember, by far the #1 reason why kids play sports is to have fun, so it is our job as adults to help create the type of experience kids most desire.  Another part of our job as adults is to make sure kids are safe, not just physically from things like concussions and ACL’s, but also their mental health and helping them respond to stressors in healthy and effective ways.

drstankovich.com

The post More Demands, More Stress: Why So Many Student Athletes Are Dealing With Mental Health Issues appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.

Why does rage sell?

Even if you are not in advertising, it’s probably not too difficult to see why sex sells based on primitive, biological drives, but what is it about rage makes us act in similar ways?  And why are we so easily manipulated by rage — even when we are shown clear, demonstrable evidence that what we just consumed online was deeply distorted, if not entirely made up?  And what does it say about us that getting people to hate one another is actually a useful tool when looking to peddle goods and services?

There are no simple answers to the questions just posed, but by Galloway identifying the effects of rage on influence, it allows us to look at ourselves more critically and objectively — and hopefully begin to make corrections where needed.  For example, as you go clicking away today, take note of how often you are prompted to divide, hate, and blame ________ for all your troubles.  How does actively seeking rage help your day?  Do you feel better after consuming rage?  Does it lead to better emotional states, and healthier interactions with others?  Does rage consumption help you become more open-minded, learn about others, and consider new ways of thinking?  How does starting your day by hating a person or group help you grow in any meaningful ways?  While Galloway might be right that rage sells, it is up to us as consumers of rage to look more deeply at what rage-baiting does to us psychologically to our mental health, and to stop consuming content that stunts our development and creates artificial hate toward others.

There are countless healthy and fun ways to use the internet, but actively seeking rage content is not one of them.  When we consume this kind of information day after day, unhealthy thinking and behaviors develop over time, as does our world view.  While these changes occur, we tend to seek more content that confirms our biases (confirmation bias), and we spend more time interacting with other exact like-minded people.  This constant reinforcement impacts our world view, and it is all manipulated by folks who know they can throw out just about any angry and/or outlandish claim and that their audience will be there ready and waiting.

I believe Galloway has identified a growing problem that desperately needs attention, an issue that lives freely on the internet with virtually no policing of any kind.  Increasingly more podcasters are realizing that solid, accurate content doesn’t sell nearly like it would if it were salacious, and so they are incentivized (monetarily) to push truth to the farthest boundary — if not disregard it altogether.  Why not flat-out lie and use rage at every turn?  There doesn’t appear to be any penalty for doing so, and in all likelihood you will soon generate a following of other angry people looking to point their frustrations toward someone or some thing.  Sure, the podcaster makes money and the advertisers see a spike in sales from this artificial rage, but how does it make you feel?  What benefits does it provide to you?  Do you think this kind of daily pattern of tuning into anger helps — or hurts — your mental health?

Final thoughts

Rage certainly sells, especially online where there isn’t much policing, and the goal is to get you to click and stay on specific webpages that make a lot of money keeping you pissed off.  They (the podcasters and advertisers) win, but do you?  While it might feel cathartic in the moment to hate on the same people that your favorite podcaster tells you to hate, there is also very serious, psychological damage that can occur when coping with human stress in this fashion.  Instead, step outside, take a walk, enjoy the company of positive people in your life, and serve as a role model to others for better mental health and life outcomes.  Yes, rage sells, but it only sells if we let it.

drstankovich.com

The post Hooked on Anger: The Mental Health Price of Online Rage Culture appeared first on The Sports Doc Chalk Talk with Dr. Chris Stankovich.