Impacted Vehicles (2021–2024 Model Years)
The issue affects roughly 721,000 vehicles worldwide, specifically focusing on the 2021–2024 model years. Affected models include:

• Chevrolet Silverado 1500
• Chevrolet Tahoe
• Chevrolet Suburban
• GMC Sierra 1500
• GMC Yukon & Yukon XL
• Cadillac Escalade & Escalade ESV

Nature of the Shortage & Recall

• Defect: The 6.2L L87 engines may have defective connecting rods or crankshafts, causing engine seizing or loss of power.
• Shortage Cause: The demand for replacement engines is exceeding production capabilities, creating a bottleneck for repairing existing vehicles while simultaneously trying to build new ones.
• 2025 Exemption: Reports indicate 2025 model-year vehicles are not part of the recall because they were built after June 1, 2024, when GM implemented manufacturing improvements, however we are still seeing 2025 and 2026 vehicles out of service for an extended period of time.
• Status: Many dealers have no 6.2L replacement engines available, leading to long-term loaners for customers or, in some cases, owners waiting months for repairs.

Depending on the age and mileage, consumers impacted by the GM engine shortage have rights to free legal representation under either State Lemon Laws or Federal Warranty Statutes. Potential recourse could include a full repurchase of the vehicle or significant compensation to reflect the diminished value while maintaining full ownership. Under State and Federal laws, General Motors must pay all attorney fees and legal costs on top of recourse if the consumer prevails, When 1 800 LEMON LAW accepts a claim, the client never pays anything, win or lose.  Since 1991, Kimmel & Silverman has successfully resolved more GM lemon Law and Breach of Warranty claims for GM consumers than any other firm in the Country, and their efforts have been featured in numerous news stories and consumer features.

If you are a GMC, Chevrolet, or Cadillac driver dealing with a 6.2 liter engine issue:

• Make sure you get the vehicle to a GM authorized dealer as soon as possible for service.
• Do not drive the vehicle or take the vehicle home until the necessary service is performed.
• Keep written records of when the vehicle is dropped off and service personnel you are working with.
• Communication with service advisors throughout the repair process should  be handled over text or email, versus phone, so you can keep track of correspondence.
• Call 1 800 LEMON LAW (1-800-536-6652) or email us (link to rid.html) to report your issue and further discuss your rights to free legal help and potential recourse.
• Immediately upon receipt of the vehicle following repair, secure detailed repair records with mileage in, mileage out, days out of service, vehicle problems encountered, and repairs performed by the dealer.  These documents are very valuable to you, so keep them in safe place.

Your vehicle is a significant investment and if you have been unable to use it due to the engine shortage, you need to take action to prioritize your situation.  Kimmel and Silverman is ready to help you, as they have previously helped over 25,000 GM consumers secure the recourse they rightfully deserve. If you are driving a Chevrolet, Cadillac, or GMC vehicle with the 6.2 liter engine issue, call 1 800 LEMON LAW today.

The post Lemon Law Help for Drivers with GM Engine Problems appeared first on Kimmel & Silverman, P.C..

Video Transcript

0:00 Rich: Welcome to Riding Counsel with Rich Jaffy, where the open road meets expert advice. I’m Richard Jaffy, an attorney and biking enthusiast. And this is the podcast where we dive into the world of motorcycling safety, culture, charitable giving, and riding right. So whether you’re a seasoned rider or just getting started, let’s talk bikes, the road, and everything in between. Let’s ride.

0:24 Rich: Hello everybody out there in riding.com podcast land. Thank you so much for joining us. If you are a new listener, thank you very much for joining us. And if you are a repeat listener, thanks a lot for coming back. And if you like what you hear on this podcast, please do me a favor: like it, subscribe, share, tell all your friends. I am Rich Jaffy. I’m your host for riding.com, and I am a motorcycle enthusiast. I am a podcaster and I am a personal injury lawyer. I represent people who are injured as a result of the negligence of others and usually these people are on a motorcycle. So things seem to mesh with my podcast and what I do. Today I wanted to bring you some great information because we have a lot of legal information on all my other episodes—some stuff about depositions, some stuff about how to pick a lawyer, all kinds of topics. I also have stuff about MotoGP, other stuff about how to maintain your motorcycle—I’ve got all kinds of episodes. But today, I want to try to get some information from somebody who is much more knowledgeable on the subject than I am on lemon law because I get a lot of questions from a lot of you talking about the lemon law: how do I make a lemon law claim, what is a lemon law, what makes it a lemon—stuff like that. So, I brought on an extremely knowledgeable guest about lemon law and her name is Jackie. Instead of me saying all these amazing things about her—because there’s a lot—I wanted to give her the chance to introduce herself. So, Jackie, who are you? What do you do? What do you like? Give me everything. Give me the 411. Who are you?

2:10 Jackie: Hi, Richard. Thank you for having me on. My name is Jackie Harriet. I am an attorney at Kimmel & Silverman. I’ve been with the firm for 28 years. I’m licensed to practice law in eight states, including New York. Our specialty in our firm is Lemon Law, which includes cars and motorcycles. That’s what we do here, and I’ve been doing it a very long time.

2:38 Rich: Wow. That’s great. I’m happy to have you on because there’s a lot of people who are asking me, like, you know, “I have to bring it in for repair so much, I just want to give it back.” Can you explain—what is the Lemon Law? Tell us what it is.

2:51 Jackie: Sure. The Lemon Law is a statute designed to protect consumers when they buy defective goods, specifically cars and motorcycles—and in New York it also covers motorhomes. It protects you when you have to keep taking your vehicle back because you keep having problems. Specifically with motorcycles, unfortunately the bikes seem to sit out of service for very long periods of time—almost the whole riding season for most of our clients. It’s extremely frustrating when it’s not a car; you want it for the nice riding season and half the time it’s sitting at the dealer. They either can’t get the parts or can’t figure out what’s wrong with it, and most of the time it’s serious safety issues where you can’t ride the bike without being in jeopardy.

3:41 Rich: So, manufacturers have a responsibility to have the parts on hand? Is that what you’re saying?

3:45 Jackie: During COVID they all blamed not being able to get parts, but yes—the basis of the statute is to make repairs within a reasonable amount of time. They have to be able to do that. If the bike—or even a car—sits in the shop for an unreasonable amount of time, they’ve essentially violated the Lemon Law, and they have to either replace your bike, give you your money back, or, if you prefer to keep the bike, you can take a cash settlement.

4:18 Rich: Is this in all cases of a repair? Let’s say someone is in a motorcycle accident and their bike is wrecked and, say, the frame is bent and they have to call the manufacturer for a new frame to repair it. It’s taking like three, four, five months to get that part from the manufacturer—despite the fact it’s a pretty modern bike, newer than 2020. Would something like that qualify as a Lemon Law case?

4:47 Jackie: Unfortunately, accidents would not. It has to be a manufacturing defect. If you’re in an accident and they just can’t get the parts to fix it, that’s not a Lemon Law violation. It has to be a factory defect—something that would be covered under the warranty—to be considered a Lemon Law claim.

5:03 Rich: I see. So it’s a warranty claim and it has to be from the factory—something that went wrong from the factory.

5:11 Jackie: Yeah. If you bought a used bike that had no warranty, you couldn’t bring a Lemon Law case or a breach-of-warranty case. It would have to be a new bike or a used bike that was still covered under the factory warranty when you purchased it.

5:26 Rich: So, this sounds like a federal law. Does it pretty much cover all the states, or is it only some states that are covered by the Lemon Law?

5:32 Jackie: Each state has its own specific Lemon Law, and then there’s the Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act, which is a federal statute that applies throughout the states. But yes—each state has its own Lemon Law and its own standards for what you have to prove to show a violation.

6:08 Rich: Let’s talk thresholds. How many times does it have to go in for repairs? Someone told me they brought in their motorcycle for the same thing for the third time. It’s being repaired in a reasonable amount of time—maybe five days—but they’re sick of bringing it in over and over. Could that be a lemon?

6:39 Jackie: The catch under the Lemon Law is it’s not as easy as people think to prove a violation. Number one, it has to happen within the first 24 months or 18,000 miles. It also has to be a substantial impairment—to use, value, or safety. Not every problem will qualify. You also have to give a reasonable opportunity to repair—often considered four repair attempts for the same issue or 30 total days out of service.

7:08 Rich: And when someone brings a Lemon Law case, do they usually bring it in state court or federal court?

7:18 Jackie: State court. You usually won’t meet the amount-in-controversy for federal court unless you have a super-expensive vehicle. Motorcycles generally won’t get you there, so it’s a state case.

8:38 Rich: If someone listening thinks, “I’ve got a Lemon Law case,” how do they get in contact with you? This is what you do for a living, right?

9:02 Jackie: Sure. Two ways: on the web at lemonlaw.com or our 800 number, 1-800-LEMON-LAW. If they call or go to the web, they’ll be put in contact with client services, who will screen and let them know if it’s something we can help with. Then it comes to an attorney to handle from there.

9:31 Rich: How big is your firm? Is it just you, or do you have a few attorneys there?

9:34 Jackie: We probably have about 12 to 15 attorneys, and like I said, I’m licensed in eight states and other attorneys are licensed in others. We practice all over the United States.

9:49 Rich: There must be a lot of Lemon Law claims to keep you in business.

10:08 Jackie: There are thousands. People are always shocked. I personally have three paralegals and an associate—just for me. It’s a big firm. You wouldn’t believe how many people need our help. We get hundreds of calls a week.

10:36 Rich: I’m not asking how much you earn, but how do clients pay you? Credit card, check, something different?

10:48 Jackie: These cases are fee-shifting. Manufacturers—essentially as a penalty for not voluntarily complying—pay the consumer’s attorney’s fees. Clients don’t pay us. We get paid directly by the manufacturers. Some clients misunderstand and think we work for the manufacturers; it’s the opposite—we pursue them.

11:32 Rich: How many of these actually go to trial?

11:43 Jackie: In 28 years, I’ve tried four jury trials. Most manufacturers realize it’s cheaper to settle—our fee could be $40–50k, while the case might settle for $10k if it goes to trial. Most cases settle. I can sometimes settle a case in two weeks, because we have good programs set up with most manufacturers.

12:25 Rich: That’s the difference between going to a specialist like you versus someone who just “tries a Lemon Law case.” I do motorcycle accident law; I’m not taking on Lemon Law. People should go to someone who knows what they’re doing. With you, they’ll get results—often quickly.

12:56 Jackie: We’ve had people try with their personal injury attorney and get nowhere. Then they give the case to us and we resolve it within a month, because we have the connections and have dealt with the same attorneys for decades. They know we know what we’re doing—and that we won’t go away easily.

13:23 Rich: Let’s get back to Lemon Law specifics. People say, “I don’t know what I did with my paperwork—maintenance records, invoices. I did some maintenance myself and don’t have records.” Does that come into play?

14:07 Jackie: It’s so important. I tell clients: invoices and maintenance records are like medical records in an injury case. Many people don’t think they’ll need them—stick them in an envelope or glove box. With motorcycles, at least save them at home. You can try to get copies later, but dealers tend not to cooperate once they realize what you’re doing. Keeping records makes these cases much easier.

15:00 Rich: I’d imagine once a Lemon Law claim is made, higher-ups spring into action—“we need happy customers; find the part”—and the problems go away.

15:20 Jackie: Clients tell me that a lot. Sadly, it often takes calling us to get the car fixed—they finally take it seriously. We have one manufacturer now where clients’ cars sit for months; dealers won’t call back; we can’t get updates; cars just sit. And the biggest problem is not getting a loaner. Some people pay thousands for rentals—unsustainable. With cars, that’s huge. With motorcycles, maybe it’s not your only transportation, but if it is, your transportation for your job is sitting in the shop and no one cares.

16:19 Rich: Let me ask about warranties. For instance, Harley-Davidson comes with a two-year warranty, but you can buy an extended service warranty. If the warranty is extended by contract, does the Lemon Law follow as well?

16:48 Jackie: The catch with most extended warranties: factory warranty is a promise to repair; extended warranties are usually a promise to pay. As long as they’re paying for covered parts, you can’t really sue under Lemon Law if you only have an extended warranty. It’s tricky. If you bought, say, a Ford with a Ford extended warranty, we still try, but it’s not as easy as under the manufacturer’s original factory warranty. Also, those state Lemon Law windows (like 24 months/18k miles) don’t “extend.”

17:28 Rich: Cosmetic issues—paint chipping after a few months. I love my motorcycle and don’t want any marks. If there’s a paint problem, does that fall under Lemon Law?

18:00 Jackie: Paint depends. If the whole bike needs repainting, that could be a substantial impairment to value and might qualify. We’ve had clients with tiny pin marks—that won’t rise to substantial impairment. It might be breach of warranty, but probably not Lemon Law buyback.

18:33 Rich: This is interesting. The law is designed to help consumers against big manufacturers, but it’s also specific—you can’t just be unhappy with something cosmetic and use the law that way. It’s specific but powerful.

19:01 Jackie: Exactly. Most clients don’t understand that a minor issue—like a radio shutting off—won’t get you a Lemon Law buyback. Courts don’t find that substantial. Lemon Law is essentially saying the vehicle is so dangerous or defective it should be taken off the road, not just fixed for a minor annoyance.

19:34 Rich: You’re incredibly articulate on this and clearly experienced. You’ve helped so many people and it sounds like you have a really solid firm.

19:56 Jackie: Thank you.

19:56 Rich: Just to repeat how to get in touch: either the website, lemonlaw.com, or the 800 number, 1-800-LEMON-LAW.

20:02 Jackie: Yes—either one.

20:04 Rich: How easy is that to remember? Lemonlaw.com and 1-800-LEMON-LAW. If you can’t remember those, don’t worry about the Lemon Law and get to your closest doctor. But seriously—if you need a Lemon Law lawyer, get in touch with Jackie. For anyone dissatisfied, or frustrated at how long the dealer is taking with your bike—get to Jackie. It’s easy: lemonlaw.com or 1-800-LEMON-LAW.

20:37 Rich: I think that’s all the time we have for this episode. Really interesting stuff—thanks for sharing your time and knowledge. A lot of people have been asking, and thankfully we’re talking to an expert on Lemon Law, which is not me. I’m the accident guy. Ridingcounsel.com—remember to like, subscribe, and share. Jackie, I really appreciate it. We’re going to wrap up this episode, and hopefully we’ll have you back on if we get more specific questions. If anybody wants to comment, do so down here. I answer every single comment, every single call. I can get them to Jackie or we can make a whole new episode. Thanks a lot, Jackie, for hanging with us and being so helpful.

21:21 Jackie: Thanks for having me, Richard. Have a good day.

21:23 Rich: You too. And that’s a wrap for this episode of Riding Counsel with Richard Jaffy. Thanks for tuning in. If you enjoyed the ride, be sure to subscribe, leave a review, and share with your fellow riders. Until next time, keep the rubber side down and ride safe.

The post Riding Counsel Podcast 🎙️: Jacqueline Herritt Talks Motorcycle Lemon Law with Rich Jaffe appeared first on Kimmel & Silverman, P.C..

The post The Magnuson Moss Warranty Act: A hidden gem most consumers do not know about appeared first on Kimmel & Silverman, P.C..

The problem centers around a software glitch in the vehicle’s Accessory Protocol Interface Module (APIM), which can cause the backup camera image to freeze, delay, or fail when the car is in reverse. Although Ford plans to release a software update beginning June 17, 2025, that update may come too late for many who have already made repeated trips to the dealership without achieving long-term results.

The recall spans a wide range of 2021 to 2024 Ford and Lincoln models, including the Bronco, Edge, F-150, Escape, Expedition, Mustang Mach-E, Transit, and Super Duty trucks, as well as Lincoln’s Navigator, Nautilus, and Corsair. According to official records, this camera issue has already prompted nearly 40 complaints, and at least one crash has been reported. While Ford has acknowledged the defect, the question remains: what happens to owners who’ve already experienced recurring problems, even before this recall?

That’s where the Lemon Law may come in. If you’ve had repeated issues with your backup camera or have been in and out of the shop with no permanent fix, you may be eligible for compensation. In many cases, consumers are entitled to a replacement vehicle, a full refund, or cash settlement, and the manufacturer is responsible for covering all legal fees. The law doesn’t just apply to brand-new cars. If your vehicle is under warranty and the problem persists, your claim could still be valid.

Since 1991, Kimmel & Silverman has been helping drivers just like you hold manufacturers accountable and get back on the road with confidence. If your Ford or Lincoln has been affected by this backup camera defect, don’t wait. Reach out to us for a free case evaluation by calling 1-800-LEMON-LAW or contacting us online.

The post Ford Rear-view Camera Problem – What Your Need To Know appeared first on Kimmel & Silverman, P.C..

Under the addendum, the PA Lemon Law applies to motorcycles that have been repeatedly in the shop under manufacturers’ warranty for the same issue or 30 or more days for one or more issues within one year of purchase or the term of the warranty, whichever comes first. While the Pennsylvania Lemon Law states that automobile defects must occur within the first 12,000 miles, motorcycles have no mileage parameter.

Potential remedies under the Pennsylvania Motorcycle Lemon Law could include a complete repurchase of the unit, a brand new motorcycle, or significant compensation to reflect the diminished value of the bike as a result of the defect.  The Lemon Law also includes a fee-shifting provision, meaning that if the consumer prevails, the manufacturer must also pay all attorney fees and legal costs on top of damages or as part of any settlement package offered.  With our firm, when we take on a motorcycle Lemon Law claim, there is no cost or risk, win or lose.

If the bike is produced before May 18, 2025, or your warranty repairs fall outside the first year of ownership, the consumer may still have rights under the Federal Magnuson Moss Warranty Act.  Under this law, consumers could secure significant compensation to reflect the diminished value of their bike because of the defects, while keeping the motorcycle.  Like the Lemon Law, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act also has a fee-shifting provision that enables completely free legal representation to distressed drivers.

If you a resident of Pennsylvania including Ambler, PA, Pittsburgh, PA and other cities, and you have questions about the Pennsylvania Motorcycle Lemon Law or Federal Magnuson Moss Warranty Act, we can help. Click here to submit your case for review or call us at 1 -800-536-6652.

The post Pennsylvania Lemon Law Now Covers Motorcycles appeared first on Kimmel & Silverman, P.C..

The 2024 GMC Yukon Denali is marketed as a luxury SUV packed with power, featuring a 6.2-liter V8 engine that delivers performance and reliability. But for a growing number of owners, that promise is falling apart—literally. Reports of sudden engine failures are showing up across the internet, with drivers sharing their experiences under searches like “2024 GMC Yukon Denali engine failures Reddit” and “2024 GMC Yukon Denali engine failures forum.”

If you’re an owner or considering buying one, here’s what you need to know.

What’s Going Wrong with the 2024 Yukon Denali Engines?

Dozens of 2024 Yukon Denali drivers report unexpected engine shutdowns—some even while driving at highway speeds. Posts on Reddit and forums like TahoeYukonForum.com describe cases where the 6.2L V8 engine completely failed, often before reaching 10,000 miles.

One forum member shared that their Denali had suffered not one, but two complete engine failures. The vehicle had been at the dealership for months awaiting a second replacement. According to mechanics and insiders, these failures are tied to a known mechanical issue involving the engine’s connecting rod bearings.

Common Symptoms Before a Failure

While some owners report early warning signs, others say the engine failed with no advance notice. Here are some of the symptoms people have shared online when searching for “2024 GMC Yukon Denali engine failures symptoms”:

• The engine suddenly stalls or shuts down
• Knocking or ticking noises coming from the engine
• Sudden drop in oil pressure
• The check engine light may flicker or briefly turn on
• Complete engine seizure with no prior warning

The most troubling part is that, in many cases, there were no signs until the engine completely gave out.

What’s Causing It?

In January 2025, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) opened an official investigation (Investigation PE25001) into these engine failures. So far, they’ve logged at least 39 complaints involving vehicles with the L87 6.2L V8 engine, which was used in various GM vehicles from 2019 through 2024, including the Yukon, Tahoe, Suburban, Silverado, Sierra, and Escalade.

The issue appears to be a failure of the connecting rod bearings, which can cause the connecting rod to break and pierce the engine block. NHTSA noted that in most cases, there were no warning signs before the engine lost power. This creates a serious safety concern since losing engine power while driving increases the risk of a crash.

2024 GMC 6.2L V8 Engine Specs

The L87 6.2L V8 engine in the 2024 Yukon Denali boasts:

• 420 horsepower
• 460 lb-ft of torque
• Dynamic Fuel Management system
• Premium fuel recommended

These specs may look great on paper, but growing concerns across “2024 GM 6.2 engine problems forum” threads suggest the engine may not be as dependable as promised.

How Widespread Are These Problems?

This isn’t just one or two bad engines. Across multiple forums and Reddit threads, more and more drivers are stepping forward with similar complaints. From full breakdowns to extended repair delays due to lack of replacement parts, many owners are frustrated—and some are even considering legal action.

Some drivers have had to wait months for a new engine, only to experience another failure not long after. Searches like “2024 GMC Yukon Denali 6.2 engine problems” continue to bring up new reports almost weekly.

Impacts on GM Arlington Manufacturing

A critical aspect of this situation is the role of GM’s Arlington Assembly plant in Arlington, Texas. This facility produces the GMC Yukon Denali, among other full-size SUVs like the Chevrolet Tahoe, Suburban, and Cadillac Escalade. Spanning 250 acres and employing over 5,600 workers, Arlington Assembly has been operational since 1954 and is a cornerstone of GM’s SUV production.

Given that the affected vehicles, including the Yukon Denali, are assembled at this plant, the engine issues directly affect Arlington Assembly’s operations. The plant has been lauded for its production capabilities, setting a 70-year monthly production record by manufacturing over 34,000 vehicles in March 2023. However, the current engine concerns may necessitate reviews of manufacturing processes and quality control measures to address and rectify the underlying problems.​

Do You Have Lemon Law Rights?

If your 2024 Yukon Denali has had repeated engine problems or has been stuck in the shop for weeks or months, you might qualify for protection under your state’s lemon law.

Lemon laws vary by state, but generally, they offer recourse if your new vehicle has been repaired multiple times for the same issue or has been out of service for a significant time. That could mean a refund, replacement vehicle, or cash compensation.

If this sounds like your situation, consider contacting the lemon law attorneys at Kimmel & Silverman, P.C. by calling 1-800-Lemon-Law. They’ve helped thousands of drivers nationwide and offer free consultations to review your case.

The post 2024 GMC Yukon Denali Engine Failures: What Owners Need to Know appeared first on Kimmel & Silverman, P.C..

Frustration Over Glitches

A number of Wrangler owners have taken to online discussions to highlight recurring problems with Uconnect. One user on a Wrangler Forum thread titled “Did I Make a Mistake?” shared:

“The interface freezes unexpectedly and my smartphone connection is constantly dropping.”
– Wrangler Forum

Similarly, another participant on JL Wrangler Forums stated:

“My Uconnect seems to lag terribly. It’s frustrating trying to navigate when the system takes forever to respond.”
– JL Wrangler Forums

These excerpts point to a common theme—owners are experiencing inconsistent performance, with some functions working smoothly one moment and then stalling the next.

Early Production Quality Concerns

Many discussions also touch on broader concerns regarding early production quality for the 2024 model. In a JL Wrangler Forums thread discussing “Any Concerns Over 2024 Early Production Quality?” one contributor noted:

“It’s clear that early production models are experiencing several glitches, with Uconnect being the most problematic part of the package.”
– JL Wrangler Forums

While some owners remain hopeful that future software updates and adjustments in production will resolve these issues, others worry that persistent glitches could diminish the overall driving experience.

What This Means for Jeep Owners

For many, these Uconnect issues are more than just minor inconveniences. The frustration over intermittent freezes, lagging responsiveness, and connectivity issues can impact everyday usability—especially when reliable navigation and smartphone integration are expected. Although experiences vary and some drivers report smoother performance, the recurring nature of these complaints is enough to raise questions about whether early production vehicles are truly living up to expectations.

Need a Free Lemon Law Claim Review?

If you’re a 2024 Jeep Wrangler owner dealing with persistent Uconnect problems that you believe significantly impact your vehicle’s performance, you might be wondering if you have a lemon law claim. For a free review of your situation, consider reaching out to the experienced attorneys at 1-800-LEMON-LAW. They can help assess your case and guide you through your legal options if your vehicle isn’t performing as promised.

For more information or to schedule your free consultation, contact 1-800-LEMON-LAW today.

Disclaimer: The excerpts featured in this article are based on user reports from online forums and represent individual experiences. They are provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice.

The post 2024 Jeep Wrangler Uconnect Issues: What Owners Are Saying appeared first on Kimmel & Silverman, P.C..

And while those problems could all be classified as dangerous defects, many drivers are unaware that radio issues, backup camera concerns, or even Bluetooth problems could result in significant recourse, specifically under Federal Law.

Modern vehicles are equipped with advanced electronics that play a critical role in convenience, safety, and functionality.

Faulty sound systems that cut out unexpectedly, navigation systems that misdirect or fail entirely, or Bluetooth connections that drop calls or refuse to sync can create ongoing frustrations for vehicle owners. If these systems repeatedly fail to function as intended despite multiple repair attempts, they could meet the criteria for legal recourse under Federal Law.

Have you been back repeatedly for a Bluetooth problem, a radio replacement, or a navigation system that leads you nowhere? The Federal Magnuson Moss Warranty Act says that if you have a warranty, that warranty should ensure that problems are fixed efficiently and effectively.

If you are back three, four, five times before the problem is resolved, you are entitled to compensation from the manufacturer for the diminished value of your vehicle caused by the defect. This could result in thousands of dollars back in your pocket while you retain ownership of the vehicle.

The same applies to infotainment systems that freeze, rearview cameras that fail to display properly, or faulty electronics that interfere with your ability to drive safely.

Manufacturers are obligated to ensure that these systems work as promised when covered under warranty, and repeated failure to repair them opens the door for legal action under the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act.

Best of all, just like the Lemon Law, representation under the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act is completely free to the consumer. If you prevail, the manufacturer must pay all attorney fees and legal costs on top of your compensation. If you do not prevail, there is no cost to you.

What should you do if one of these frustrating defects is driving you crazy? Start by documenting your repair visits. Always request an invoice from the dealer each time you bring the vehicle in, and ensure it notes that the same issue persists despite previous repair attempts.

Once you’ve returned to the dealer three or more times for the same issue, it’s time to meet with a Lemon Law Attorney in your state to discuss your rights and options.

After all, you pay top dollar for your vehicle. If critical systems aren’t working the way they should, there’s no reason for you to settle for anything less than what you were promised. Whether it’s a transmission issue or a misbehaving navigation system, the law is on your side.

The post Bluetooth Problems Leaving You Speechless? You Have Rights. appeared first on Kimmel & Silverman, P.C..

77-Year-Old, Handicapped Man From Bucks County Sues Cherry Hill Triplex For Fraud, Deceptive Practices, And Theft Of Thousands Of Dollars

CHERRY HILL, N.J. (September 25, 2006) – A 77-year-old man filed suit this past week against the Cherry Hill Triplex automotive group of Southern New Jersey, claiming bait and switch tactics, deception, and theft. Responding to an advertisement offer guaranteeing $8,000 for his trade, Kenneth Hammel of Fairless Hills, PA says he was eventually charged over $42,000 for a 2005 Kia Sedona, that actually had a retail price of $23,250.

Hammel filed suit in the Court of Common Pleas in Bucks County and is being represented by Craig Thor Kimmel of the Lemon Law and Automotive Consumer Advocacy Firm of Kimmel and Silverman.

Hammel, who is physically disabled and requires the use of a motorized wheelchair, claims to have traveled to the Cherry Hill Triplex dealership from his home in Bucks County to trade in his 2000 Chrysler Town & Country for a vehicle that could accommodate a motorized lift. After many hours of high-pressure selling, Hammel agreed to purchase a 2005 silver Kia Sedona.

After demanding a $4,000 deposit, the salesman insisted on accompanying Hammel to the bank to make the withdrawal. Approximately 12 hours after his arrival at Cherry Hill Triplex, Hammel drove home in a new 2005 Kia Sedona, at a purchase price of $23,940.48, $700 more than the suggested retail price of the car.

The next day, Hammel noticed the motorized lift installed by the dealership was not functioning correctly. He contacted Cherry Hill Triplex and was advised to drop off the vehicle for repair three weeks later. When he returned, Hammel alleges the dealership presented him with a different car – a beige 2005 Kia Sedona, claiming it to be the same car. Cherry Hill also insisted that Hammel fill out paperwork and asked for his ATM card for “a credit reference”. After he did as he was told, dealer personnel admitted it was a different car, but claimed that the beige van was “better”.

At this time, unbeknownst to Hammel, the dealership was actually trading in the new car he purchased a few weeks prior, subtracting nearly $8,000 for depreciation, and selling him a second new car at the purchase price of $42,662.92, an increase of more than $18,000 from the previous sale. The annual percentage rate increased from 7.49% to 10.4% and the monthly payment rose from $250 a month to $385.88. Hammel was asked to sign additional paperwork and was told it was needed to “complete” the original sale, when in actuality, it was required to complete the trade.

Two days later, Hammel discovered that the dealership used his ATM card without authorization, withdrawing $2,000 from Hammel’s bank account.

According to his attorney, Craig Thor Kimmel, Hammel was victimized in several ways, some common frauds given the name “spot delivery with yo-yo”, where the consumer is sold a car, delivered with a known problem, in this case the poor wheelchair lift installation, to get the consumer back at a later date, when new documents are signed at higher contract prices, higher monthly payments, additional cash deposits, and/or a different finance rate.

Kimmel says that each of the changes, misrepresentations and acts of non-disclosure were unlawful and deceptive business practices, but not unusual given high profits that can be realized. “This is a particularly outrageous case however, because it involves a highly vulnerable consumer, a senior citizen in need of wheelchair assistance, taken advantage of by certain business practices. While we see cases involving some of these facts on a daily basis, rarely have I seen one as troubling and upsetting as this,” says Kimmel.

With five full-service offices, located in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and Delaware, Kimmel & Silverman is the Northeast’s oldest and largest Lemon Law and automotive consumer advocacy firm. The firm has provided cost-free Lemon Law and breach of warranty help to more than 45,000 consumers since its inception in 1991, recovering over $140 million for their clients.

The post Bait and Switch Fraud appeared first on Kimmel & Silverman, P.C..

The New Jersey Lemon Law is the second most effective Lemon Law in the nation, according to a recent study by the Center For Auto Safety. CAS recently compared the New Jersey Lemon Law to Lemon Laws in other states and the District of Columbia.

Under the NJ Lemon Law, if a consumer’s car suffers a defect which affects the use, value, and safety of the vehicle, within the first 18,000 miles or 24 months, whichever comes first, and the problem can’t be fixed after a reasonable number of repair attempts, the car is deemed a lemon and the consumer is entitled to a new car of equal value or all of their monies back, including down payment, taxes and tags, and trade in, minus a small mileage offset.

The New Jersey Lemon Law also covers vehicles that are in the shop for repair 20 or more collective days during the first year. Both purchased and leased vehicles are covered under this statute.

In a congratulatory letter sent to New Jersey Attorney General David Sampson, the Center for Auto Safety lauded New Jersey for allowing consumers “to go to an attorney immediately to get rid of their lemon rather than waiting for the arbitration process.”

Clarence Ditlow, CAS Executive Director, also commended the state for providing cost-free legal representation under the Law. If a consumer prevails, the manufacturer is responsible for paying all attorneys fees.

“Many New Jersey consumers don’t realize that they have rights if their dream car turns into a nightmare, and that legal representation is cost-free” says nationally-recognized automotive consumer advocate Robert M. Silverman of the Cherry Hill, NJ Lemon Law Firm of Kimmel & Silverman. “The fact is that New Jersey consumers have always had one of the strongest Lemon Law statutes around, and I am pleased that Mr. Ditlow has recognized this.”

The Center for Auto Safety feels that New Jersey could strengthen their Lemon Law provision by requiring only one repair attempt if a defect threatens death or serious bodily injury, covering a vehicle that has many different problems at once, and penalizing auto manufacturers who willfully violate the Lemon Law.

The post New Jersey Lemon Law Ranking appeared first on Kimmel & Silverman, P.C..