<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/</link>
	<description>Lawyer Ron Coleman on brands, the Internet &#38; free speech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 13:47:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">10510281</site>	<item>
		<title>Best of LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®: Nuts to us?  Or a &#8220;real&#8221; Charlie Brown Christmas? (Archive post)</title>
		<link>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/best-of-likelihood-of-confusion-nuts-to-us-or-a-real-charlie-brown-christmas-archive-post/</link>
					<comments>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/best-of-likelihood-of-confusion-nuts-to-us-or-a-real-charlie-brown-christmas-archive-post/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 13:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Management and Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Brown Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coca-Cola]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=17390</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted 2016-12-23 11:29:09. Republished by Blog Post PromoterOriginally published December 9, 2009. Now a heartwarming tradition of bloggy goodness. Instapundit links to this item about the incredible shrinking Charlie Brown specials &#8212; warmly-remembered favorite scenes from the annual Peanut broadcasts being incrementally excised from annual broadcasts to make room for more and more commercials.  [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/best-of-likelihood-of-confusion-nuts-to-us-or-a-real-charlie-brown-christmas-archive-post/">Best of LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®: Nuts to us?  Or a &#8220;real&#8221; Charlie Brown Christmas? (Archive post)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com">LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/best-of-likelihood-of-confusion-nuts-to-us-or-a-real-charlie-brown-christmas-archive-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17390</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Knockoff News 51</title>
		<link>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/knockoff-news-51/</link>
					<comments>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/knockoff-news-51/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 13:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted 2007-02-27 20:03:50. Republished by Blog Post PromoterCounterfeit Chic doesn&#8217;t miss a beat!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/knockoff-news-51/">Knockoff News 51</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com">LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/knockoff-news-51/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">834</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best of 2007: Litigation guy</title>
		<link>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/best-of-2007-litigation-guy-2/</link>
					<comments>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/best-of-2007-litigation-guy-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 13:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Parody and Satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carol Burnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Guy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=14000</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Seems we just get started and before you know it, comes the time we have to say, "So long."</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/best-of-2007-litigation-guy-2/">Best of 2007: Litigation guy</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com">LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/best-of-2007-litigation-guy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14000</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three score and phony years ago</title>
		<link>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/three-score-and-phony-years-ago/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 13:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1021</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted 2007-06-08 17:45:24. Republished by Blog Post PromoterCounterfeit Chic has posted Knockoff News number 60!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/three-score-and-phony-years-ago/">Three score and phony years ago</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com">LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1021</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogadelic</title>
		<link>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/blogadelic/</link>
					<comments>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/blogadelic/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 13:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Roundups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blawg Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted 2011-10-04 18:43:02. Republished by Blog Post PromoterBlawg Review #15 will blow your mind. Man.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/blogadelic/">Blogadelic</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com">LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/blogadelic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">181</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogger lawsuit resolved</title>
		<link>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/blogger-lawsuit-resolved/</link>
					<comments>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/blogger-lawsuit-resolved/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 13:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=937</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted 2010-11-02 11:55:34. Republished by Blog Post PromoterJust Another Pretty Farce indeed! By the way, download Glenn Reynolds&#8217;s article (we&#8217;ve linked to it before) on online defamation. It&#8230; it would mean a lot to him.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/blogger-lawsuit-resolved/">Blogger lawsuit resolved</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com">LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/blogger-lawsuit-resolved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">937</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mix &#8216;n&#8217; match</title>
		<link>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/mix-n-match/</link>
					<comments>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/mix-n-match/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 13:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Practice and Profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyer Jokes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=3251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted 2011-11-08 08:32:24. Republished by Blog Post PromoterThe thing about lawyer jokes &#8212; besides the fact that they&#8217;re never funny when you all of a sudden have to call one of us in the middle of the night &#8212; is that they don&#8217;t necessarily have to make any sense at all to be considered [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/mix-n-match/">Mix &#8216;n&#8217; match</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com">LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/mix-n-match/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3251</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best of 2011:  Dubious assignations</title>
		<link>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/best-of-2011-dubious-assignations/</link>
					<comments>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/best-of-2011-dubious-assignations/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 13:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Rights of Publicity and Personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autographs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimi Hendrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right of Publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor Swift]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=14755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted 2015-03-12 22:42:02. Republished by Blog Post PromoterFirst published on March 8, 2011. Steve Baird generously linked back to this LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® post writing about the trademark status of some singer&#8217;s signature at the superb, now-two-years old Duets Blog.  His novel question: Do you suppose TS fans have an expectation that the Taylor Swift signature trademark represents [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/best-of-2011-dubious-assignations/">Best of 2011:  Dubious assignations</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com">LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/best-of-2011-dubious-assignations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14755</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Counterfeit rodent gets the cheese</title>
		<link>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/counterfeit-rodent-gets-the-cheese/</link>
					<comments>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/counterfeit-rodent-gets-the-cheese/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 12:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture Clash]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1057</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted 2007-07-02 19:31:14. Republished by Blog Post Promoter Decadent western culture is rat obsessed, it&#8217;s true. But sometimes the rodent has to take one for the team. Now, in true Islamist fashion, but with an IP twist: How to avoid (mostly theoretical) trademark / copyright liability while still being &#8230;. defiant? MEMRI TV shows [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/counterfeit-rodent-gets-the-cheese/">Counterfeit rodent gets the cheese</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com">LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/counterfeit-rodent-gets-the-cheese/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1057</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brands, cancel culture &#038; disparaging trademarks</title>
		<link>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/brands-cancel-culture-disparaging-trademarks/</link>
					<comments>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/brands-cancel-culture-disparaging-trademarks/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 12:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Management and Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disparaging Trademarks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=20393</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Cancel culture proves that disparaging trademarks go away by themselves</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/brands-cancel-culture-disparaging-trademarks/">Brands, cancel culture &#038; disparaging trademarks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com">LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/brands-cancel-culture-disparaging-trademarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20393</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s trademark litigation gravy train &#8211; the Bratz / Barbie case is back!</title>
		<link>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/americas-trademark-litigation-gravy-train-the-bratz-barbie-case-back/</link>
					<comments>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/americas-trademark-litigation-gravy-train-the-bratz-barbie-case-back/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Practice and Profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bratz]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=10555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted 2014-09-08 18:10:26. Republished by Blog Post PromoterI can&#8217;t claim to be keeping close tabs on what&#8217;s going on in the Barbie / Bratz trademark litigation. But lookie here: A federal appeals court has ruled that Mattel Inc. doesn&#8217;t have to pay $172 million to MGA Entertainment Inc. to settle a trade secrets theft [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/americas-trademark-litigation-gravy-train-the-bratz-barbie-case-back/">America&#8217;s trademark litigation gravy train &#8211; the Bratz / Barbie case is back!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com">LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/americas-trademark-litigation-gravy-train-the-bratz-barbie-case-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">10555</post-id>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boo.</title>
		<link>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/boo/</link>
					<comments>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/boo/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Costumes and Clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right of Publicity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1223</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Originally posted 2007-10-31 17:21:07. Republished by Blog Post PromoterThe intellectual property concerns regarding celebrity Halloween masks. Cheap-rubber-band-stapled-to-temples-of-plastic-mask tip to Overlawyered.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/boo/">Boo.</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com">LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/boo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1223</post-id>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
