If you ever go to a local supermarket or convenience store to buy an Apple gift card, you may think twice after reading a new report from New Hampshire Public Radio. The state of New Hampshire in the U.S. appears to be the center of a global criminal operation that involves stolen Apple gift cards, huge quantities of Apple hardware bought with those cards, and sales of the gear to gray-market importers who then sell the devices overseas.

The N.H. operation started with the theft of Apple gift cards in retail outlets. The cards were carefully opened so the PIN and other vital statistics could be recorded, but otherwise looked unused. Then the cards are repackaged and placed back in the stores. When the card was activated with a balance, the organization was notified, took the money from the card, and then used it to buy Apple products, such as iPhones and MacBooks.

The Apple products were bought in New Hampshire because the state doesn’t charge sales tax, which allowed the organization to make the most of the stolen money. The products were then shipped to a warehouse in New Hampshire, where the devices were repackaged and sold to gray-market importers in China, Dubai, or South America, who then turned around and sold the devices to individuals or other outlets.

According to the report, police in New Hampshire partnered with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to crack down on the operation that was run by Chinese nationals and involved hundreds of millions of dollars. In one bust, a New Hampshire warehouse housed 4,000 iPhones, estimated to be valued at $8 to $9 million. Nearly 20 people have been charged, with charges including wire fraud, stealing gift cards, and receiving stolen property. The report also states that Apple fully cooperated in the investigation, though it did not comment on NHPR’s article.

NHPR’s report is compelling, explaining in detail how the scam works, the process of laundering the purchases, some of the problems that have arisen in court, and how one person was murdered during a robbery of a warehouse. I encourage you to give it a read.

How to protect yourself from gift card scams

In 2024, the Federal Trade Commission reported that losses from gift and prepaid card scams totaled over $212 million, and the number of scams continues to rise. The FTC has a website that explains how gift card scams work, the common types of scams, and what to do if you think you’ve been scammed.

Apple

There are also several things you can do to protect yourself. It’s convenient to buy a gift card from a retail store, but if you can avoid it, you minimize your risk. Many stores allow you to buy gift cards online, which requires you to send an email address for the recipient, and the store sends a redemption code that the recipient can use when making a purchase. Don’t buy from online auctions, since the cards could be stolen. Buy directly when you can–Apple sells gift cards online.

But sometimes you can’t avoid buying a gift card from a store. If you need to, there are a few things you can do to minimize your risk. The FTC recommends the following:

• Stick to stores you know and trust. Avoid buying from online auction sites because the gift cards may be fake or stolen.
• Inspect the gift card before you buy it. Make sure the protective stickers are on the card and that it doesn’t look like someone tampered with them. Also check that the PIN number on the back isn’t showing. Pick a different gift card if you spot a problem and show the tampered card to a cashier or manager.
• Always keep a copy of the gift card and store receipt. Take a picture of the gift card and store receipt with your phone. The number on the gift card and store receipt will help you file a report with the gift card company if you lose the gift card or if you need to report fraud.

Federal Trade Comission

If you’re in the market for a laptop upgrade, you’ll want to get as much RAM and storage as you can without destroying your budget. Today’s deal does just that, bringing the price of an M5 MacBook Pro with 32GB of RAM and 1TB of storage to just $1,799 at Amazon, a massive $300 savings.

This $300 discount is the best we’ve seen for this particular MacBook configuration. And what more could you ask for? This laptop features the powerful M5 chip boosted by 32GB of unified memory on board. This combo will breeze through any of the tasks you have to complete, whether you’re merely sending emails, coding, or editing complex videos. This MacBook also offers maximum connectivity with Thunderbolt 5 ports, an HDMI port, an SDXC card slot, as well as reliable MagSafe 3 charging, along with a headphone jack.

When it comes to storage space, you’ll have plenty of room for all those files you need to keep because this configuration also includes a 1TB SSD that offers both quick transfer times and boot times. With a 14.2-inch Liquid Retina XDR display, you’ll love streaming content in your downtime, while also taking advantage of fantastic color accuracy when editing images and brilliant HDR for videos.

Don’t miss out on this impressive discount for one of Apple’s best laptop configurations and get the M5 MacBook Pro for $1,799.

With WWDC less than a month away, Apple has officially released iOS 26.5 to all iPhone users, and while it isn’t a major update, it introduces many long-awaited tweaks and improvements, as well as new options for customizing the look of your iPhone or iPad.

From encrypted RCS messages to controversial changes in Maps and a beautiful new Pride wallpaper, here’s everything new in iOS 26.5.

Encrypted RCS messaging

One of the most notable additions in iOS 26.5 is support for end-to-end encrypted RCS messaging in the Messages app. While it’s still technically labeled as a beta feature and limited to supported carriers, it’s the first step toward iPhone users being able to chat securely with their Android friends.

Apple had previously tested encrypted RCS during the iOS 26.4 beta cycle, but the feature didn’t make it into the general release. Now, it’s officially rolling out to users.

Foundry

RCS already brings iMessage-like improvements such as better media quality, typing indicators, and read receipts when messaging Android users. With end-to-end encryption, Apple is closing one of the biggest privacy gaps between iPhone and cross-platform conversations.

That said, availability will vary depending on carrier support, so not everyone will see it right away. However, all three major carriers (Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile) are already beta-testing it, so it shouldn’t be long. You can enable encrypted RCS messages by going to Settings > Apps > Messages > RCS Messaging.

Pride Luminance wallpaper

As part of its annual Pride collection, Apple is introducing a new “Pride Luminance” wallpaper in iOS 26.5. There’s nothing new about that—Apple has released a new wallpaper to celebrate Pride Month for years—but this year’s design takes it to a new level.

Pride Luminance isn’t just a static background. The wallpaper dynamically refracts colors as you move or unlock your iPhone, creating a subtle animated effect.

Foundry

More interestingly, it’s highly customizable. Users can create their own version of the wallpaper by choosing from up to 12 different colors, making it one of the most flexible system wallpapers Apple has ever made.

Not only that, but Apple Watch users will also find a new Pride Luminance watch face in watchOS 26.5 that perfectly matches the new wallpaper. 

Apple Maps gets Suggested Places (and ads)

Foundry

iOS 26.5 also introduces a new “Suggested Places” feature in Apple Maps. This section shows recommendations based on what’s trending nearby, along with your recent searches. On the surface, it’s a discovery feature designed to help users find new restaurants, shops, and points of interest.

But it also marks something more significant: the introduction of ads in Apple Maps.

Businesses can now pay to have their locations promoted in search results, meaning some of the suggestions you see may be sponsored. According to the company, privacy remains a top priority. Ads won’t be linked to users, and advertisers won’t be able to target specific groups of users, Apple promises.

Apple hasn’t made a big deal about this in its release notes, but it represents a notable shift for the platform.

Easier accessory pairing via USB-C

Foundry

Another small but very practical improvement is a new way to pair Apple accessories such as the Magic Mouse and Magic Keyboard.

With iOS 26.5, you can simply connect these devices to your iPhone or iPad using a USB-C cable, and they’ll automatically pair. After that, you can disconnect the cable, and they continue working wirelessly over Bluetooth.

It’s a simple change, but one that removes friction, especially for users who rely on these accessories with multiple devices.

Improvements for switching from iPhone to Android

Following the introduction of a new tool that makes it easier to transfer data from an iPhone to an Android device with iOS 26.3, Apple is now giving users a little more choice.

With iOS 26.5, the iPhone-to-Android transfer process now lets users choose which message attachments they want to keep for more control over what gets moved, instead of forcing a full transfer of all media.

EU-exclusive features continue to expand

As expected, iOS 26.5 includes additional region-specific changes for the European Union.

With this update, users can mirror not only notifications but also Live Activities to non-Apple devices. iOS 26.5 also extends the same AirPods quick-pairing experience to third-party accessories.

Unfortunately, since this is a requirement under EU law, these features aren’t available to iPhone users in the rest of the world.

App marketplaces are coming to Brazil

Foundry

Following similar changes in the EU and Japan, iOS 26.5 lays the groundwork for alternative app marketplaces in Brazil.

While the feature isn’t live for users yet, the update includes the necessary system support for third-party app distribution outside the App Store. That means iPhone users in Brazil will soon be able to download apps from alternative app stores, another international change driven by local regulatory changes.

Update your iPhone right now

In addition to these features, iOS 26.5 also includes bug fixes, performance improvements, and security updates. That’s why it’s always important to keep your devices updated with the latest software.

That said, this is likely the last iOS 26 update ahead of WWDC 2026, where Apple is expected to give a sneak peek at what’s coming in iOS 27.

You can install iOS 26.5 by going to Settings > General > Software Update. The update is available for iPhone 11 and later.

Price When Reviewed

$189

Best Prices Today: Sonos Era 100 SL

Retailer

Price

$189

View Deal

Price comparison from over 24,000 stores worldwide

Product

Price

Price comparison from Backmarket

The Sonos Era 100 SL is a compact wireless smart speaker designed to deliver premium sound quality at a more affordable price point. Built as a simplified version of the original Era 100, it removes voice assistant and microphone features while retaining the same powerful audio performance, sleek design, and wireless connectivity options.

The lower price tag of the Era 100 SL is intended to attract new users who may not have owned any Sonos speakers before. However, it can also be used in conjunction with other Sonos products, such as its soundbars and subwoofers, providing an affordable upgrade path for Sonos fans who may want to expand their existing multi-room or home cinema set-up.

One of the biggest drawbacks of the Sonos Era 100 SL is that its USB-C port cannot be used for direct audio input from devices like laptops, phones, or tablets, meaning users who want a wired connection must purchase a separate Sonos adaptor – an inconvenience that mainly affects people who prefer wired audio setups or want to connect non-wireless devices easily.

What’s different in the Era 100 SL vs Era 100

The original Sonos Era 100 was launched a couple of years ago, with a £249/$249 price tag that pitched it right up against Apple’s HomePod. The Era 100 is still available, but Sonos has just launched a new model called the Era 100 SL that aims to provide a “more accessible” – i.e. cheaper – option at just $189/£169.

As the name suggests, the Era 100 SL is very similar to the earlier Era 100 (which remains on sale, now at a reduced price of $219.00/£199). Available in black or white, the two speakers are virtually identical, with the Era 100 SL standing 183mm high, 120mm wide and 131mm deep. The Era 100 SL is fractionally lighter, though, as it omits the microphone and voice control features of the Era 100, which reduces the weight of the speaker by a few grams to 1.95kg.

The Era 100 SL also has the same internal set-up as its predecessor, with a pair of tweeters handling the higher frequencies, while a single woofer looks after the mid-range and bass. Each of the drivers has its own amplifier, although Sonos doesn’t provide specific details for the amplifier output.

What features does the Era 100 SL offer?

Like all Sonos speakers, the Era 100 SL is primarily designed for wireless audio, supporting Bluetooth and dual-band wi-fi on the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands. And, as always, it supports AirPlay 2 for Apple devices, allowing it to work alongside Apple’s HomePods and other AirPlay speakers as part of a multi-room audio system. The Era 100 SL doesn’t support Dolby Atmos or spatial audio, but it is possible to pair two Era 100 SL speakers together to create a stereo system, or use them with a soundbar as part of a surround-sound system for your TV.

Wired connections are more limited, though. There is a USB-C port on the back of the speaker, but this can’t be used to provide a wired connection from a USB-C port on your Mac or mobile devices. If you want to use a wired connection then you’ll have to buy a separate adaptor from Sonos, which costs $19.00/£19.00 for a basic adaptor with a 3.5mm audio connector, or $39.00 for a ‘combo’ adaptor that includes both a 3.5mm connector and an Ethernet interface for a wired network (although the 3.5mm and Ethernet cables are not included). Our only other complaint is that the power connector is recessed into the base of the speaker, which means that you have to use the special ‘angled power cable’ provided by Sonos and can’t simply use a standard power cable if you misplace the Sonos cable.

How does it sound?

Unsurprisingly, the Era 100 SL sounds very similar to its predecessor, providing very good sound quality for such a compact speaker. Despite the compact design, it works a treat with the atmospheric electronics of Madonna’s Frozen, creating a relaxed, spacious soundstage for the song’s ambient sounds. There’s a smooth tone to the opening strings, and the Era 100 SL picks out all the little details in the track, such as the jangling percussion and the gentle electronic chimes. 

It’s got some muscle too, allowing the drums to crack like a whip as they kick us into the chorus, and the bass drum anchors the sound, while Madonna’s multi-tracked vocal floats gently above it all. That power really comes in handy for the raucous rock/dance mash-up of Sturgill Simpson’s Sing Along, and I’m worried about upsetting the neighbours even with the speaker cruising along at just 60% of maximum volume.

There’s a big, echoing sound to the fuzzy guitar riffs, while the electronic keyboards fizz along with infectious energy and, again, there’s a weighty sound from the bass drum that holds the whole song together. Admittedly, the bass drop at the end of the song could be a little firmer, but bass output is always a weakness with compact speakers such as this, and the Era 100 SL provides good sound quality for a speaker in this price range. 

Should you buy the Sonos Era 100 SL?

If you simply want a Bluetooth speaker for use with mobile devices, then there are certainly cheaper options available that can match the sound quality of the Era 100 SL. But, for Apple users, it’s the AirPlay support that stands out, allowing the Era 100 SL to quickly and easily work with all your Apple devices and apps, as well as working with other AirPlay speakers as part of a multi-room audio system.

The MacBook Neo has certainly created a lot of attention for Apple and the Mac. But if you’re on the outside (a.k.a. a dedicated Windows PC user) looking in, you probably shrugged it all off as the usual Apple hype.

But Microsoft seems to be convinced that the hype is real, because it recently “commissioned” a report by Signal65 to convince everyone that Windows PCs are the better value. Presented as a serious whitepaper, “Windows 11 PCs Compared to MacBook Neo” takes the MacBook Neo and compares it to four different Windows laptops, and explains the “total value each system brings to the table.”

Two of the laptops in Sigal65’s report, the Lenovo Yoga 7i and the HP OmniBook X Flip, are priced at $1,199 and $949, respectively. “The Yoga 7i occupies a category the MacBook Neo does not compete in,” says the report, which also concludes that the Yoga’s and OmniBook’s actual market is the same as the MacBook Air. It’s not clear why they’re even in the study, so let’s move on.

The other two PC laptops are the HP OmniBook 5 and the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3x, $599 and $449, respectively, according to the study (though we couldn’t find the IdeaPad for that price). Both laptops are 16-inch models, and the large form factors play a role in their ability to outperform the 13-inch MacBook Neo. For example, the report touts the battery advantage these PC laptops have over the Neo, but the report fails to mention that the OmniBook 5’s 60 watt-hour battery and the IdeaPad Slim’s 52 watt-hour battery are much larger than the Neo’s 36.5-watt-hour battery. If anything, it’s a relief that those bigger batteries offer longer life.

Foundry

Of course, Signal65’s benchmarks show the PC laptops outperforming the MacBook Neo in most of its tests. And it also points out how they offer better specs: more ports, more storage, and more robust external display support. Advantage to the PCs in these aspects. As for the contention that the 16GB of RAM in these PCs is better than the Neo’s 8GB, PCWorld rightfully points out that “extra memory may not give as much of a performance boost as you’d hope in Windows 11.”

When it comes to the display, our sister site, PCWorld, said the IdeaPad Slim 3X’s display “is the weakest part of the experience,” and that “in real life, it feels not just unusually dim, but also dull.” As for the LED display on the OmniBook 5, PCWorld reported that “the contrast ratio is limited and darker scenes in movies and games can look washed out. Brightness is mediocre; it’s enough in many situations, but a sunlit window can begin to overwhelm the display. Outdoor use is largely out of the question.” So, bigger isn’t necessarily better.

And there’s one major aspect that the report doesn’t cover at all, and that’s the build quality of these laptops. The OmniBook 5 case is completely made of plastic, while the IdeaPad Slim 3X offers a combination of aluminum and plastic. (PC users love plastic, apparently.) Meanwhile, the MacBook Neo offers an all-aluminum case in four fun colors and a top-notch display that looks as good or better than displays in more expensive laptops.

Would you be willing to sacrifice a little bit of processing speed for a display that’s a pleasure to use and construction that’s equally beautiful and durable? Apple understands that a lot of people would. Microsoft, meanwhile, wants you to read a whole paper on why it doesn’t matter.

The ‘platform advantage’

Then there’s the “platform advantage” offered by Copilot+ and Windows 11. Which, I guess, is because Windows is the dominant operating system in business. Windows certainly has an advantage with “bloatware, ads, and other grossness” (those are the words of PCWorld). In their review of the IdeaPad Slim 3X, PCWorld found that the laptop’s “software is a bit obnoxious out of the box, as it tends to be on consumer Lenovo laptops. For example, McAfee antivirus pops up and encourages you to buy a subscription.” That’s a “platform advantage” I can live without.

Microsoft

As for Copilot, PCWorld recently called it “the new Internet Explorer,” which isn’t a compliment, in case you’re too young to remember Internet Explorer. Another PCWorld article opines that “Copilot just seems like a garbage buffet of artificial stupidity, licensing issues, and design decisions that don’t put users first.” Yikes. I mean, what do you expect from something Microsoft says is intended solely for “entertainment purposes”?

The report also describes the “value” that Microsoft offers to college students, which includes a free year of Microsoft 365 Premium. That sounds like a good deal, until you realize that Apple includes its own iWork apps on every Mac for free. Also, many colleges and universities already offer free access to Office 365, regardless of whether you’re using Windows or a Mac. Plus, there’s Google Workspace, Libre Office, or some other online office suite. Overall, the value of Office 365 isn’t really a benefit.

The laptops also include free year-long access to Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, but after that, you need to pay $23 per month to keep it. Students can also get a free Xbox Design Lab Wireless Controller. Okay, I’ll admit Apple can’t compete with PC’s dominance in games, and PCs have an advantage here. But try gaming on one of these laptops, I’ll wait.

But let’s not be too harsh on Microsoft; after all, as PCWorld puts it, “The $600 MacBook Neo is Microsoft’s nightmare,” and it needed to do something to respond to the MacBook Neo hype. But if you need to publish a dubious whitepaper to convince people that your laptops aren’t terrible, well, you might have a bigger problem.

Using rechargeable batteries makes a lot of sense. We are happy to do this with our high-tech gadgets—laptop, phone, wireless keyboard and so on—but a lot of other consumer electronics rely on old-school alkaline cylindrical batteries, usually AA or AAA.

Items such as LED flashlights, blood pressure monitors, wireless gaming controllers and children’s toys typically eat through standard batteries.

When your standard batteries are done you should be taking them to be properly recycled to prevent their toxic chemicals from leaking into landfills and water sources.

It makes better environmental and financial sense to buy rechargeable batteries that you can refill when they run out rather than having to dispose of them and go out to buy some more. Those batteries are mostly of the Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH) variety that allows for recharging unlike cheapo alkaline. The problem is that they require a special dock for charging.

Simon Jary

For a long time, I’ve owned an Energizer battery charger, a dedicated dock that you insert the compatible rechargeable batteries into when they need refilling. This isn’t difficult but the bulky dock needs a decent amount of space to be stored, and it’s usually hidden behind a bunch of other everyday utilities.

These older NiMH rechargeable batteries quickly lose their charge while sitting in a drawer. Superior Lithium-Ion batteries have a lower self-discharge and hold a strong and consistent voltage while in use.

I have now taken my box of NiMH rechargeable batteries to be recycled as I’ve started using high-performance Lithium-Ion batteries that can be recharged via USB-C—so there’s no need for a bulky charging dock. Each battery has a built-in USB-C port and a smart LED battery-life indicator that lets you know when the power is topped up and ready to go.

The brand of eco-friendly rechargeable battery I use is Statik, which sells USB-C rechargeable Lithium-Ion AA and AAA batteries in packs of 4 ($25.99), 8 ($42.99), or 12 ($55.99) at its online store.

Depending on your USB power source, AAA batteries should fully charge in under one hour, and AA batteries in under two hours.

Statik

Statik includes a 4-to-1 charging splitter cable so you can plug up to four batteries directly into a standard USB wall adapter, power bank or even laptop—just like charging your phone. Note that you need to use a USB-A to USB-C cable rather than USB-C to USB-C due to technical details I won’t bore you with here.

Each Statik AA High-Density Lithium-Ion battery has a capacity of 2,800mWh, with the smaller AAA at a lower 850mAh. They should be good for over 1,200 charging cycles, saving you and the planet thousands of disposables.

One of the best ways to charge your Apple gadgets at home and on the road is, hands-down, this Anker Prime 3-in-1 charging station. Even better, you can get it for 30 percent off today, bringing the price down to its lowest yet — $105.

This fold-up charger features three parts. First, there’s the larger magnetic pad where you can place your phone. It’s angled just right to allow you to still check out your notifications or scroll social media while it’s charging. Then, there’s the dedicated Apple Watch charger that allows you to “hang” the watch on it. And just beneath it, you’ll find the AirPods charger pad.

Built for speed, this Anker device uses advanced Qi2.2 technology, which means it can deliver up to 25W of wireless charging, quickly recharging an iPhone 17 Pro from 0 to 50 percent battery in under half an hour. The charging station comes with a 45W USB-C charger and a 5ft cable, so you’ll be able to plug this in wherever you go. And the best part is that the whole device folds on itself, so it’s uber easy to pack and carry with you on vacation, for instance.

Don’t miss out on the chance to get this compact 3-in-1 Anker Prime charging station while it’s still on sale for $105.

Good news, everyone: Google hasn’t copied Apple’s Liquid Glass interface design after all, despite hinting at this in promotional materials. All the Android users who pushed back so vehemently will doubtless be pleased, although it’s debatable whether the thing it actually announced is much better. Instead of copying Apple’s surface aesthetic, Google has copied its unhealthy obsession with system-wide AI.

This year, the company has revealed, Android will transition “from an operating system into an intelligence system.” Its Gemini AI tech will be integrated at all levels: automating tasks across apps, offering autofill suggestions, converting natural speech to more polished text, and acting as a gatekeeper for web browsing. Whenever you turn on an Android device with the new OS, you’ll be confronted by a pushy AI assistant offering to do everything for you.

Google calls this setup Gemini Intelligence, which feels a bit on the nose. I’m not sure why it didn’t go the whole hog and call it Gapple Gintelligence. But a lack of originality is par for the course from Apple’s rivals. Google is just being unoriginal in an unexpected way.

Google

To be clear, I wouldn’t for a second accuse Google of copying Apple’s AI technology. Apple came late to the AI party and still hasn’t caught up, whether because of wise patience or just a frustrating lack of R&D success. Right now, Gemini is objectively better than Apple Intelligence. What Google is copying–and where it’s making a strategic error, in my view–is Apple’s structural and presentational approach to AI. Which is to say, shoving it down users’ throats at every opportunity.

Some users, I suspect, will find this approach alienating: Most people simply do not love AI as universally and uncritically as C-suite tech executives. As things stand, the (admittedly significant) proportion of Android users who are fascinated by AI can seek out the relevant apps and services and play with them to their hearts’ content, but the skeptics are left in peace. Integrating Gemini at the system level forces it upon everyone’s attention and feels like a company pushing its own agenda rather than helping users with theirs. Speaking as an iPhone and HomePod owner, I can certainly confirm that an overeager AI assistant is deeply off-putting.

Credit: Google

Considering the matter from a societal rather than individual perspective, broad AI integration is worrying because, as a colleague neatly phrased it, this reduces the intentionality of using the technology. Instead of hitting a roadblock, struggling for a moment to get past it, deciding to use AI, and then doing so, we are rushed from the first to the last stage. It reduces the friction in the process, and in this case friction is good because it encourages the user to consider whether AI is the right tool and whether they could accomplish the task themselves. Not to mention priming them to watch out for hallucinations (which may be particularly important with Gemini Intelligence’s unproven agents).

This isn’t exactly a startling insight, but it’s entirely absent from Google’s (and Apple’s) pronouncements on the topic, so here we go: AI is kind of bad for us. It diminishes critical thinking, spreads misinformation, puts people out of work, creates revenge porn, harms the environment, fills social media and art sites with boring slop, and pushes up the price of tech hardware. I’m not going to say we all should stop using AI, because that genie is out of the bottle. But at the very least, we should use it thoughtfully, with respect for what it costs and awareness of its limitations. Not just because that’s the first option on our phone screens.

So no, I’m not impressed by Gemini Intelligence. But at least Android won’t have those horrible transparency effects. Chin up, everyone.

The Mac mini appeals to both budget-conscious consumers and creative professionals. More recently, it has also become a highly popular platform for AI development and local model execution, thanks to its unique combination of high-bandwidth unified memory, impressive power efficiency, and compact form factor – perfect for scalable stacks of computing power.

Its recent surge in popularity has been driven largely by the exceptional performance-to-price ratio of Apple silicon. Unfortunately, growing demand from AI developers, combined with ongoing component shortages, has led to extremely limited Mac mini availability, and as of mid May 2026, wait times are stretching into months. As a result, finding one in stock at a reasonable price can be difficult – although we have found Mac mini models available to buy in the U.K.

There is another reason why those looking to purchase a Mac mini should consider waiting: Apple is widely expected to refresh the Mac mini with M5 series chips in the near future. If you can afford to wait, that would be our recommendation. 

However, if you need a Mac mini sooner and manage to find one available, we can help you decide whether it’s worth buying, what a fair price would be, and whether you’d still be better off waiting for the next generation.

Apple Mac mini (M4 Pro, 2024)

Read our review

Price When Reviewed: $1,399

Best Prices Today: $1,399 at Amazon | $1399 at Apple | $1399 at Apple United States

Is now a good time to buy a Mac mini?

IDG

Whether now is a good time to buy a Mac mini depends largely on how urgently you need one. The current M4 and M4 Pro Mac mini (reviewed here) are excellent machines with outstanding performance, efficiency, and value for money, but they are becoming increasingly difficult to find in stock. At the same time, expectations are growing that Apple is preparing to refresh the lineup with M5 and M5 Pro models.

Apple last updated the Mac mini in October 2024, introducing the M4 generation alongside the desktop’s first major redesign in 14 years, reducing the chassis to an ultra-compact 5-by-5-inch form factor. Historically, Apple has refreshed the Mac mini on an approximately two-year cycle, which puts the current lineup close to the expected window for an update.

Rumors initially suggested the next Mac mini could arrive in the first half of 2026, potentially at Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in June. However, severe shortages affecting the current M4 models may complicate Apple’s timeline. As mentioned above, demand from AI developers and memory supply constraints have created unusually long wait times for some configurations. As a result, the M5 Mac mini may not arrive until later in 2026 – and some reports now suggest it could even slip into 2027.

If you can find an M4 Mac mini at a reasonable price and need a machine immediately, it is still an easy recommendation. However, if you can afford to wait, it may be worth holding off to see what Apple announces next.

When is the next Mac mini expected?

The next Mac mini is widely expected to launch sometime in 2026. Earlier rumors suggested Apple was targeting the first half of the year, with WWDC in June seen as the most likely announcement window.

Several factors support the idea that a refresh is approaching. As mentioned, M4 Mac mini inventory has become increasingly limited, with some higher-end configurations facing shipping delays of several weeks. Historically, declining inventory levels at Apple and third-party retailers have preceded a hardware refresh as existing stock is cleared ahead of a new release.

That said, the same factors driving those shortages may also delay the next-generation Mac mini launch. The strong AI-related demand and memory supply issues have put unusual pressure on Mac mini availability, particularly for higher-memory models favored by AI developers. Because of this, while an M5 Mac mini still appears likely for 2026, there is growing speculation that Apple’s schedule could slip into late 2026 or even 2027.

How much should you pay for Mac mini?

The Mac mini is occasionally discounted by third-party retailers. If you can find one on sale – particularly higher-memory configurations or remaining 256GB M4 models – it may still be a worthwhile purchase even with an M5 refresh on the horizon. 

In the U.S. Amazon has previously dropped the price of the $599 Mac mini to $469 (in July 2025), while the $799 model has previously dropped to $669 (November 2025). 

We have also seen Amazon U.K. drop the price of the Mac mini from £799 to £689.99 (in October 2025). While the £599 model had seen a price drop to £499 in November 2025. 

However, at the moment there is little to no stock in the U.S. and, where stock is available, delivery times are long.

We can’t find a Mac mini available in the U.S. Amazon only has old refurbished models in stock currently. 

In the U.K. we have seen the £799 Mac mini on Amazon U.K. and KRCS. Amazon even has it available for next-day delivery. So if you are U.K. based and need to buy one we recommend doing so before stock runs out. Due to the shortages the price is not being discounted by Amazon. KRCS has a discount but the wait is weeks.

Buy the Mac mini from KRCS for £759

Buy the Mac mini from Amazon U.K. for £799

Buy Mac mini M4 Pro from Amazon U.K. for £1,399

Best reasons to buy a Mac mini

Foundry

Excellent value: The Mac mini remains one of the most versatile and cost-effective ways to enter the macOS ecosystem. Although Apple removed the previous entry-level configuration – raising the starting price from $599 to $799 – the Mac mini still delivers excellent performance per dollar. That balance of price, power, and efficiency is one of the main reasons for the desktop’s growing popularity. It also offers access to professional-grade performance for significantly less cash than a similarly specced MacBook Pro.

Long software support window: Even if Apple introduces an M5 Mac mini in the near future, the current M4 generation is still expected to receive many years of macOS updates and security support. Buyers should still get a long usable lifespan out of today’s models. 

Compact desktop footprint: The Mac mini’s ultra-compact 5-inch square design makes it one of the most space-efficient desktop computers available. It fits easily under monitors, in small offices, or in minimalist workstation setups. Its compact form factor also makes it particularly attractive for server racks, home labs, and multi-machine deployments. 

Retail discounts and refurbished deals: Despite already offering strong value at full price, the Mac mini is occasionally discounted by third-party retailers. If you can find a Mac mini deal – particularly higher-memory configurations or remaining 256GB M4 models – it may still be a worthwhile purchase even with an M5 refresh on the horizon. The Apple Refurbished Store can offer even better value, assuming stock is available. In the past, we have seen the M4 Mac mini discounted by around $100/£100, while M4 Pro models have dropped by approximately $200/£210. If deals like these reappear, they are likely worth considering.

What are the biggest reasons not to buy Mac mini?

Foundry

Upcoming M5 models: The strongest reason to wait is the expected arrival of Mac mini models powered by Apple’s M5 and M5 Pro chips. While the current M4 generation is already extremely popular for local AI workloads and development, the M5 is expected to deliver further gains in AI performance, efficiency, and memory handling, as it has with the MacBook Pro.

Reduced configurations and rising prices: Apple has already increased the effective entry price of the Mac mini by removing the least expensive configuration from the lineup. At the same time, ongoing component shortages have reportedly forced Apple to reduce availability of some higher-end configurations, including certain high-memory M4 Pro models. 

Supply shortages: Availability remains a major issue. Buyers may face wait times of three to four weeks for entry-level models, while higher-spec configurations can take considerably longer – in some cases up to 10 weeks to ship. Limited stock also makes it harder to find discounts or preferred configurations. 

What should you avoid when buying a Mac mini?

Intel: Avoid Intel-powered Mac mini models – when shopping for a refurbished Mac mini, prioritize models with Apple Silicon (M-series chips). 

Low RAM: We advise avoiding 8GB RAM models if possible, as newer generations now start with 16GB as the base standard. 

Check status: Additionally, ensure the device is not classified as “Vintage” or “Obsolete,” as Apple typically stops providing parts for repairs after seven to ten years. 

Is Mac mini right for you?

Is the Mac mini the best choice for you? There are a number of trade-offs to consider. 

Mac mini vs Mac Studio: Which should you buy?

Thomas Bergbold

The choice between the Mac mini and the Mac Studio largely comes down to whether you prioritize value or maximum performance.

The Mac mini offers some of the best value in Apple’s desktop lineup. Even the standard M4 model delivers impressive performance for everyday computing, creative work, software development, and local AI tasks, while the M4 Pro configuration provides power for more demanding workloads.

The Mac Studio is designed for users who need workstation-class performance. Following the discontinuation of the Mac Pro, it is now effectively Apple’s most powerful desktop. Starting at $1,999/£1,999 for the M4 Max configuration, the Mac Studio also represents the most affordable way to get a Max-series Apple Silicon chip. It is well suited to professional video production, large AI models, 3D rendering, and other heavily multi-threaded or GPU-intensive workflows.

For most users, the Mac mini is a better value purchase. However, if your workloads demand high performance, more memory and a more powerful GPU, the Mac Studio is the better choice. 

Mac mini vs MacBook Neo: Which is better value?

Thomas Armbrüster

Before the introduction of the MacBook Neo, the Mac mini was Apple’s least expensive Mac. That is no longer the case – particularly now Apple has removed the entry-level $599/£599 Mac mini configuration from the lineup.

The MacBook Neo is now Apple’s most affordable Mac, starting at $599/£599. It is designed as an entry-level Mac and is powered by the A18 Pro chip originally used for the iPhone 16 Pro. The focus is on portability, battery life, and affordability rather than performance.

The Mac mini, by contrast, remains Apple’s best-value desktop Mac for users who already own a monitor, keyboard, and mouse. Thanks to its M4 and M4 Pro chips, active cooling system, and greater performance, it is better suited to demanding workloads such as coding, creative applications, multitasking, and local AI development.

Should you buy a refurbished Mac mini?

Buying a refurbished Mac mini is a practical and cost-effective way to acquire a high-quality computer at a significantly lower price point than a brand-new model. While it offers substantial savings, the decision depends on your budget, performance needs, and where you choose to shop. 

Savings  typically range from 15% to 30% off the original retail price. 

Benefits of buying refurbished include: 

• Rigorous Testing: Official refurbished units undergo full functional testing, thorough cleaning, and inspection to meet the same standards as new products.
• Warranty and Support: Apple includes a one-year limited warranty, 90 days of technical support, and eligibility for AppleCare.
• Like-New Condition: Devices are visually indistinguishable from new models and come repackaged in a new box with all original accessories

However, there are drawbacks: 

While refurbished models are reliable, there are several factors to consider before purchasing:

• Limited Availability: Stock depends on returns and trade-ins, meaning you may not find the exact configuration, RAM, or storage you want.
• The Intel Trap: Many third-party marketplaces sell older Intel-based Mac minis. These lack the performance of Apple Silicon (M1, M2, M3, M4) and will lose software support much sooner.
• Inconsistent Standards: While Apple has strict testing, third-party sellers may have varying refurbishment standards and shorter warranties

Where to buy a refurbished Mac mini

The best place to shop for refurbished Macs is Apple’s Certified Refurbished Store where earlier in 2026 we saw the M4 Mac mini discounted by around $90/£90, while the M4 Pro model has also seen price cuts. However, as of mid May 2026, Apple has no refurbished Mac mini in stock.

On the other hand, we would avoid buying refurbished from Amazon. As of May 2026, Amazon U.S. has only 2020 refurbished Mac mini on sale which we don’t recommend buying. We’ve also seen used listings for the discontinued 256GB model, but due to scarcity these are even higher than the original price. 

Read our guide to the pros and cons of buying refurbished Macs. We also have recommendations of the best places to buy a refurbished Mac.

Formatting an SD card on a Mac can feel like permanent data loss—but in many cases, your files are still recoverable. Whether you accidentally formatted the card during a camera setup, encountered a file system error that forced a format, or simply erased the card to reuse it, understanding your recovery options is critical.

This 2026 guide draws on EaseUS’s years of hands-on Mac SD card recovery experience and testing across all modern macOS versions.

Method 1. Recover data from a formatted SD card on a Mac with software

• Best for: Most users, highest recovery success rate
• Difficulty: Easy
• Success rate: High when data is not overwritten

Specialized data recovery tools are the gold standard for recovering data from formatted SD cards on Mac. EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard for Mac can help you find lost data from the SD cards with a single click.

It can bypass the missing file system index and scan the card sector by sector to identify and rebuild lost files, such as photos, videos, and documents. Unlike macOS built-in tools, it specializes in external storage such as SD cards and supports all common formats, including ExFAT, FAT32, the default for SD cards used with cameras and mobile devices.

Step 1. Select the SD Card

Open the EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard. Select “SD Card” and click “Search for lost data” after selecting the original location of your lost data. 

EaseUS

Step 2. Choose scanned files

After the scan, click “Type” and expand the folder you want. Click on the file type you lost.

EaseUS

Step 3. Preview and recover data from a formatted SD card

Double-click to preview your lost data, select the appropriate version, and click “Recover” to save it to a different secure location on your Mac.

EaseUS

Method 2. Restore from a Backup (Time Machine / Cloud)

• Best for: Users with active backups
• Difficulty: Very easy (built-in Mac tools)
• Success rate: High if the backup is complete and up-to-date

Time Machine is Mac’s built-in backup tool that automatically saves copies of files from connected drives, including SD cards, if you enabled backups for them. To restore data from Time Machine on Mac:

Step 1. Connect your Time Machine backup drive to your Mac.

Step 2. Open the folder where your SD card files were stored.

Step 3. Launch Time Machine from the menu bar by clicking the clock icon or via Spotlight.

Step 4. Use the timeline on the right side of the screen to navigate to a backup date prior to when you formatted the SD card.

Step 5. Select the files or entire folder you want to restore, then click “Restore.” The files will be saved back to their original location.

EaseUS

Finder on Mac has a built-in search feature that lets you find files in any folder on your Mac. It is helpful when you want to retrieve vanishing desktop files or show hidden files on a Mac.

Step 1. Open the Finder and click the Search icon in the upper right corner.

Step 2. Enter the name of the file. The finder will begin searching automatically.

Step 3. If you do not know the name of the missing Excel file, you can instruct Finder to display all Excel files stored on your Mac by typing “.xls” or “.”xlsx” and picking the Microsoft Excel Workbook under Kinds.

Method 3. Use macOS Terminal

• Best for: Advanced users with technical experience
• Difficulty: High
• Success rate: Low–moderate

Mac’s Terminal includes tools like diskutil and dd that can attempt basic recovery, but they are not designed for formatted SD cards and have critical drawbacks.

Unlike professional software, they offer no file preview, no selective recovery, and a high risk of overwriting data if you enter commands incorrectly.

Step 1. Open Terminal (Applications > Utilities > Terminal).

Step 2. Type diskutil list to identify your SD card (look for its size, e.g., “64GB”) and note its identifier (e.g., /dev/disk2).

Step 3. Use diskutil repairDisk /dev/disk2 to repair minor file system errors (this may restore visibility to some files).

For raw recovery, use tools like PhotoRec (open-source, run via Terminal) to scan the card.

Why can formatted SD card data still be recovered

Many Mac users assume formatting erases all data instantly, but that’s not how modern storage works. When you format an SD card on your Mac, the system performs a “quick format” by default, which is designed for speed rather than secure erasure.

Instead, it only removes the file system index. Think of this as tearing out the table of contents from a book – the pages are still there, but you can’t find them without the index. However, it leaves the underlying data fully intact until new files are written over the old sectors.

This is why recovery remains possible. First, you stopped using the SD card immediately after formatting. Every time you take a photo, save a file, or even transfer data to the card, you risk overwriting existing data. Second, no new files were written to the card post-format.

Even a small new file can overwrite critical sectors of a large video or RAW photo. Third, the format was a “quick format” rather than a secure erase. macOS offers a “secure format” option in Disk Utility that overwrites data multiple times, making recovery nearly impossible, but most users perform quick formats by accident.

Final Thoughts

Recovering data from a formatted SD card on a Mac is not only possible. It’s often successful if handled correctly. The key takeaways are simple: stop using the card immediately, prioritize professional recovery software for the highest success rate, and always back up your data to avoid future loss.

With WWDC just weeks away, the rumors about macOS 27 are starting to fly. On June 8, Apple will officially reveal the follow-up to macOS 27 Tahoe, followed by a months-long beta cycle, and the official release of the new operating system in the fall.

As for what to expect, since the development is all in-house at Apple, leaks aren’t as prevalent as hardware, so a lot of the features are seen for the first time at the WWDC keynote. However, we’ve heard about big changes to how Siri is implemented, along with tweaks to the Liquid Glass UI that was released with macOS Tahoe.

We can also draw some conclusions based on Apple’s hardware plans. For example, Apple is rumored to release its first touchscreen MacBook Pro during the macOS 27 cycle, so it’s possible that macOS 27 could bring major interface changes related to the new machine. Leading up to WWDC, stay tuned to this page as we track all the latest macOS 27 rumors.

macOS 27 release date: When will macOS 27 be available?

• First developer beta: June 8, 2026
• First public beta: July 2026
• Final version: September 2026

Apple will debut macOS 27 at WWDC26. Apple’s Keynote presentation will be on June 8, 2026, and it will highlight the key features. Apple also holds a “Platforms State of the Union” session that goes into greater detail on the features and how they are implemented, but the session is for developers, so it’s quite technical.

Apple will release a developer beta at WWDC, followed by a public beta in July. The beta cycle includes several iterations as Apple refines the software. Here’s how you can participate in the beta program.

Apple is usually ready to release the official version of macOS in the fall. In recent years, Apple has released macOS at the same time as iOS. The iOS release has been happening during the second week of September, so Monday, September 14, is our guess as to when macOS 27 becomes available to everyone.

However, Apple has occasionally released macOS at a different time than iOS, delaying it for a few weeks. Here is a history of release dates for macOS:

• macOS 26 Tahoe: September 15, 2025
• macOS 15 Sequoia: September 16, 2024
• macOS 14 Sonoma: September 26, 2023
• macOS 13 Ventura: October 25, 2022
• macOS 12 Monterey: October 25, 2021
• macOS 11 Big Sur: November 19, 2020
• macOS 10.15 Catalina: October 7, 2019
• macOS 10.14 Mojave: September 24, 2018
• macOS 10.13 High Sierra: September 25, 2017
• macOS 10.12 Sierra: September 20, 2016

macOS 27 compatibility: Which Macs will get macOS 27?

• macOS 27 ends support for Intel Macs

With the release of macOS 26 Tahoe last year, Apple announced that it would be the last version that supports Macs with Intel processors. That means when macOS 27 is released, you’ll need a Mac with an M1 processor or later to install it.

Foundry

Only M-series Macs will be able to run macOS 27. The list of supported Macs is expected to look like this:

• MacBook Neo (A18 Pro/2026 and later)
• MacBook Air (M1/2020 and later)
• MacBook Pro (M1/2020 and later)
• iMac (M1/2021 and later)
• Mac mini (M1/2020 and later)
• Mac Studio (M1/2022 and later)
• Mac Pro (M2/2023 and later)

Users should also take note that macOS 27 will be released about six years after the first M1 Macs were released in November 2020. Apple’s macOS support cycle usually runs about seven years; after that, Apple starts the deprecation process that eventually leads to the end of support for the device. Apple has not stated if macOS 27 will be the last or next-to-last version of macOS that M1 Macs can support, but it’s possible that the first Apple silicon Macs could get cut off next year.

macOS 27 performance: Stability improvements

• Main focus on stability

macOS and the rest of the OS 26 releases last year introduced some of the biggest changes that Apple has made to its operating systems in recent history. Since it was such a big release, it follows that the xOS 27 releases this June won’t include a ton of feature changes.

According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple “is focused on improving the software’s quality and underlying performance… Engineering teams are now combing through Apple’s operating systems, hunting for bloat to cut, bugs to eliminate, and any opportunity to meaningfully boost performance and overall quality.”

In this case, Apple seems to be taking a cue from its release of Mac OS X Snow Leopard in 2009, which focused on stability and performance following 2007’s Mac OS X Leopard.

macOS 27 Apple Intelligence: Will Siri finally get an upgrade?

• Siri app
• Chatbot upgrades
• Google Gemini foundational model

The main spotlight at WWDC26 is expected to revolve around upgrades to Siri. Along with the original Apple Intelligence-based features we haven’t gotten yet, namely contextual awareness and app intents, reports have said that Apple plans a further “AI reboot” of Siri, which includes a new interface, a chatbot, a standalone app, and the technical implementation of Google Gemini as the foundational model. Details are somewhat light, but expect a major overhaul of Apple’s digital assistant. Learn more about the new Siri features.

However, the reports we’ve read about the new Siri almost always reference it as part of iOS 27, as Siri is primarily marketed as an iPhone feature. That doesn’t mean it won’t be a major component of macOS 27—it certainly will be—but the reports here reference iOS 27 rather than macOS 27.

Foundry

It’s in Apple’s best interest–given that Siri is already delayed–to update Siri on macOS 27 with the same features as iOS 27. That hasn’t always happened—for example, in 2019, Apple finally updated Siri in Mac OS 10.15 so that it can set alarms and timers, something Siri on iPhone has done from its start in 2011—but in recent years, Siri has received feature parity across iPhones, iPads, and Macs.

Along with the new Siri, reports claim that iOS 27 will have a lot of new Apple Intelligence features, and while many of those features are iPhone specific, there are several that are likely to make their way into macOS 27. Some Apple Intelligence features that could be in macOS 27 include:

• AI-based photo-editing tools in the Photos app
• Text editing tools similar to Grammarly
• AI tools in Calendar
• Automatic tab groups in Safari

macOS 27 UI: Liquid Glass tweaks and touchscreen elements

• Liquid Glass refinements
• Touchscreen MacBook Pro preparation
• Dynamic Island

With macOS 26, Apple introduced a major revamp of the macOS interface, based on Liquid Glass. It’s not going anywhere, but Apple will use macOS 27 to make refinements. Gurman reported that macOS 27 will address “transparency quirks” and other design issues. The changes will “make Liquid Glass look the way Apple’s design team intended it to from the start,” according to the report.

Foundry

Additionally, Apple is expected to release a touchscreen MacBook Pro sometime during the macOS 27 cycle, which will include UI elements for touch. Gurman said in a report that macOS 27 will offer a “refreshed, dynamic user interface that can shift between being optimized for touch or point-and-click input.” A new menu will appear with touch controls when the user touches the screen, and menu items will expand to make touching them easier. Gurman also said that these new laptops will have a Dynamic Island similar to the one on the iPhone. It will not have Face ID, however.

It’s unclear whether macOS 27 will feature visible interface changes to accommodate the new touchscreen MacBook or if the interface will contain hidden elements that adjust for touch input.

macOS 27 name: Which California landmark will macOS 27 get?

With macOS, Apple gives it a name that refers to an association in California. It’s a tradition that started in 2013 with OS X 10.9 Mavericks (referring to the surf break in the Half Moon Bay area). Here is a list of the names since then:

• 10.9 Mavericks
• 10.10 Yosemite
• 10.11 El Capitan
• macOS 10.12 Sierra
• macOS 10.13 High Sierra
• macOS 10.14 Mojave
• macOS 10.15 Catalina
• macOS 11 Big Sur
• macOS 12 Monterey
• macOS 13 Ventura
• macOS 14 Sonoma
• macOS 15 Sequoia
• macOS 26 Tahoe

Three years ago, a list of names that Apple had trademarked was posted to X. Here is that list of (then) trademarked named that have not yet been used:

• Condor
• Diablo
• Farallon
• Grizzly
• Mammoth
• Miramar
• Pacific
• Redwood
• Redtail
• Rincon
• Shasta
• Skyline
• Tiburon

It’s not clear if the trademark has expired on any of these names. However, it’s worth noting that the name “Big Sur” had expired before Apple decided to use it for macOS 11.

TL;DR: Microsoft Windows 11 Pro is down to $9.97 through May 18 (reg. $199).

Even dedicated Apple fans usually end up needing a Windows PC at some point in life. Maybe it’s the office laptop. Maybe there’s one desktop at home handling spreadsheets, schoolwork, taxes, 3D printing projects, or all the random software that somehow still only exists on Windows.

And if that PC still feels stuck in another decade, Windows 11 Pro is a surprisingly inexpensive fix.

Right now, Microsoft Windows 11 Pro is available for just $9.97 (reg. $199) through May 18, which is an upgrade that can immediately improve daily use.

The biggest difference is how much cleaner and smoother everything feels. Snap Layouts make multitasking less chaotic, virtual desktops help organize work and personal projects.

Security also gets a major boost with features like TPM 2.0, BitLocker encryption, Smart App Control, biometric login support, and Windows Sandbox.

Then there’s Copilot, Microsoft’s built-in AI assistant. It can summarize webpages, answer questions, help brainstorm ideas, generate writing prompts, and even assist with coding tasks directly inside Windows.

And because this is the Pro version, you also get access to professional-grade features like Hyper-V virtualization and Azure AD support.

Jump on this chance to get Windows 11 Pro for just $9.97 (reg. $199) through May 18.

Microsoft Windows 11 ProSee Deal

StackSocial prices subject to change.

On paper, face swapping is no longer a technical challenge. The underlying AI has matured quickly, and results have improved across the board. But for Mac users, the experience of actually using these tools hasn’t always kept pace.

Yet Mac users have historically faced a familiar problem: many AI-powered tools either prioritize Windows ecosystems or rely heavily on cloud workflows that compromise speed, privacy, or quality. That’s where newer platforms like VidMage aim to shift the balance, offering a more optimized experience for Mac users seeking reliable, high-quality face-swap solutions.

But how does a tool like this actually fit into the broader landscape of AI media editing? And, more importantly, does it meet the expectations of Mac users accustomed to refined, performance-conscious software?

Let’s break it down.

The Growing Demand for Face Swap on Mac

Search interest in “face swap for Mac” has grown steadily over the past two years, driven by three observable shifts in content creation:

• The dominance of short-form video platforms (TikTok, Instagram Reels, YouTube Shorts)
• Wider accessibility of AI‑generated content tools
• A creator economy that increasingly values speed and differentiation

However, for macOS users, most face‑swap solutions come with friction:

1. Open‑source tools often require manual setup—Python environments, dependency management, and GPU configuration.
2. Browser‑based services struggle with large video files and impose upload limits.
3. Professional editing suites like Final Cut Pro and Premiere Pro lack built‑in AI face‑swap features.

The result is a clear gap between what users want—fast, clean, realistic face swaps—and what existing tools actually deliver on Mac. VidMage positions itself directly within that gap.

A Mac‑First Approach to AI Face Swapping

VidMage

Where many AI tools treat macOS as an afterthought, VidMage adopts a workflow clearly optimized for Mac users. It runs natively on Apple Silicon (M1 or later) and processes all files locally—no internet connection required, no file size limits, and no uploads to external servers. The tool supports batch processing for multiple files, 4K export resolution, and automatic face detection and enhancement.

Core capabilities:

• Face swap in videos, photos, and GIFs
• Local processing (files never leave the device)
• No file size or upload restrictions
• Batch processing for multiple files
• 4K export support
• Automatic face detection and enhancement

Instead of requiring command‑line input, GPU tuning, or third‑party libraries, VidMage streamlines the process into a four‑step pipeline:

Step 1: Import source media. Open the VidMage Mac app and import the video, photo, or GIF to be edited. The tool supports all common media formats and, because processing happens locally, imposes no file size caps.

VidMage

Step 2: Add the target face image. Upload a clear, well‑lit photo of the face to swap in (JPG or PNG recommended). For best results, the source face image should have good lighting and a fully visible face.

VidMage

Step 3. Choose the facial feature mask to swap only the lips, mouth, or nose.

Step 4. Export with minimal manual adjustment

This workflow mirrors what Mac users expect from tools like iMovie or Pixelmator: focused, efficient, and visually guided. The software does not require a native Apple Silicon build to feel at home on macOS—though performance benefits are noticeable on M‑series chips.

Evaluating Output Quality: Alignment, Lighting, and Motion

Face‑swap tools typically fall into two camps:

• Quick but low‑quality: obvious artifacts, poor edge blending, and inconsistent lighting.
• High‑quality but technically demanding:  requiring model training, manual keyframing, or GPU clusters.

VidMage attempts to bridge that divide by prioritizing output realism without demanding technical expertise. In practice, that translates into three areas:

Facial Alignment Precision

The AI model emphasizes consistent facial structure mapping, reducing common issues such as misaligned eyes, warped proportions, or unnatural expressions.

Lighting & Skin Tone Adaptation

Mismatched lighting is one of the quickest giveaways in face‑swap content. VidMage’s processing adjusts tone and exposure to better match the target scene—particularly noticeable in video outputs where lighting changes across frames.

Motion Consistency in Video

For video swaps, frame‑to‑frame temporal consistency is critical. Many tools break down here, producing flicker or distortion. VidMage reduces these artifacts, delivering smoother results suitable for social media and light professional use.

The outcome is not Hollywood‑grade VFX, but it is a clear step above novelty filters.

Conclusion

That’s the complete how‑to for face swap on macOS using VidMage. No terminal, no cloud uploads, no file size anxiety. Just a local Mac app, a few clicks, and a swapped face that never leaves your drive.

The key takeaways are simple: use well‑lit, front‑facing source footage for best results; keep low‑light or fast‑motion clips under 15 seconds per render; and remember that the free tier caps at roughly 20‑30 seconds of video daily. If you need longer clips, batch processing, or 4K export, the paid plan removes those limits.

For Mac users who value privacy over convenience‑at‑any‑cost, this workflow offers a rare combination: local processing without the usual open‑source setup headaches. Now go test it with your own footage—you’ll see exactly where it shines and where a quick lighting fix makes all the difference.

Apple released macOS 26.5 earlier this week, and it’s mostly filled with security updates, to go along with Maps’ Suggested Places and RCS end-to-end encryption. However, Apple added a new option for desktop Mac owners who think it’s too difficult to reach their Mac’s power button.

In the Energy section of System Settings for the Mac mini, iMac, and Mac Studio, there’s a new option labeled “Start up when power is connected.” According to an Apple support document, “Your Mac will now automatically turn on whenever you connect it to power, such as when plugging it into a power outlet or restoring power using an external power switch.”

Foundry

This new option is meant to address complaints about the Mac mini’s power button, which is located under the computer. You have to lift the computer slightly to access the button, which is awkward and a problem when the Mac mini is placed in a chassis or mounted in a specific way, as is somewhat common with the Mac mini due to its small size.

This option also allows users to use switches and other assistive accessories to control the power. Unsupported Macs will see the old option to “Start up automatically after a power failure.”

To install the macOS 26.5 update, go to System Settings > General > Software Update. The Mac will need to restart, and the installation takes several minutes.

With memory and storage shortages impacting everyone, it’s rare to see any type of deals on portable SSDs these days. Well, we’ve got one today: This 2TB Lexar SL500 model is on sale for a record-low at B&H Photo, shaving off $190 off the $400 price tag when you click the on-page coupon.

The Lexar SL500 is tiny enough to fit into your palm and light enough that you won’t hate carrying it with you; in fact, you might just forget you have it with you. With a USB-C 3.2 interface, this portable SSD can hit read speeds of up to 2,000 MB/s and write speeds of up to 1,800 MB/s. That means that if you connect it to your phone, you can use it to record 4K vids at 60fps without filling up precious storage space.

Getting an extra 2TB for your laptop, phone, or tablet is absolutely fantastic, especially if you’ve got a 256GB MacBook Air or Neo. Having a place to store all those pics and vids will also save you on those monthly iCloud fees. Lexar’s DataShield 256-bit AES encryption will protect your data from snooping eyes, while the IP53 dust and water rating will keep the device safe from the elements (and your clumsiness when spilling water on your desk).

Our friends at PCWorld gave this drive 4.5 stars when they reviewed it, praising its performance, profile, and 5-year warranty. In a world where storage deals are so rare they make the news, it’s time to take advantage of this $190 discount and get 2TB of extra storage space for $210.

Getting a brand new iPhone is absolutely fantastic, but budgets are tight these days. So, if you don’t care that someone tried out the phone before you did, a Renewed Premium iPhone 16e is only going to cost you $484 at Amazon right now, more than $200 off its original $699 retail price.

This refurbished phone was marked as “Premium,” which means there are no visible scratches or dents from 12 inches away, the battery has at least 90 percent health, and it comes with all its accessories. Amazon even offers a 30-day return policy and a 12-month warranty. The phone is also fully unlocked, so you won’t have to worry about connecting it to any specific network.

The iPhone 16e isn’t Apple’s newest phone, but it’s still a stellar budget-friendly phone with a 6.1-inch XDR OLED display, 1,200 nits of peak brightness, and an excellent battery. The A16 chip under the hood means this phone is perfectly ready for any Apple Intelligence tasks and then some. Plus, it’s also super fast to launch apps, swap between them, and generally do your bidding, and you’ll get support for years and years to come.

When we reviewed this phone last year, we praised its performance and battery life, as well as its Apple Intelligence support, but balked a bit at the price, which is why we love this deal so much. So, if you’ve been searching for a decently-priced iPhone, this near-perfect renewed 16e for $484 is a fantastic pick.

The MacBook Neo was a brilliant idea, and Apple deserves every bit of success that followed. But that doesn’t mean you can apply the same formula to other products without thinking it through properly, and I fear that all this talk of an iPhone Neo misses the point.

What made the MacBook Neo so appealing to customers? It was an excellent laptop at a great price, with a fun and unique look and a finely balanced set of specs. It compromised in the areas where compromise was acceptable (the trackpad, multi-core performance), and excelled in the ones where it wasn’t (look and feel, the screen, everyday performance). This all sounds simple, but it’s not.

For a start, context matters. Think of the Mac range before the Neo came along. The cheapest Mac overall was a $599 Mac mini, not including a monitor or keyboard. As for the cheapest Mac laptop, this had been $999, and went up to $1,099 the day before the Neo’s launch. Very few pundits thought $599 was a realistic price for Apple to aim for (my guess was between $699 and $799), and those negative expectations made the product look like an absolute bargain when it was announced.

Then let’s consider how Apple achieved that low price. One key element was using A18 Pro chips that were made for the iPhone 16 Pro but ended up in an unused bin due to defective GPU cores. Those binned processors were very little use to Apple, so they’re essentially free parts: it was a clever economy, the tech equivalent of flushing the toilet with water you’ve already used to wash your hands. But what happens if everyone loves your new plumbing system and starts to flush more often than they wash? You’ve got yourself a problem.

Rather oddly, for a product designed to appeal to a wide audience, the MacBook Neo isn’t really scalable: the more successful it becomes, the less sense it makes from an economic perspective. Binned chips aren’t something you choose to make; they’re an accidental byproduct of other processes. If demand explodes and you have to fill the shortfall with non-binned chips (potentially disabling a single core via software for consistency), costs go up. And that’s aside from other component costs rising at the same time, thanks to the memory crisis, another thing for which we can thank the AI bubble.

What would happen if Apple applied the Neo formula to the smartphone space? Let’s imagine, as 9to5Mac does in its plea to John Ternus, that next fall’s iPhone 18e is rebranded as or accompanied by an iPhone Neo. What would that product look like?

It would, of course, be cheap. Not “cheap” like the $599 17e, which 9to5Mac calls “exactly in line with what you’d expect from Apple.” This would sit below that tier, let’s say around $399… a number which may ring some bells, because it’s the original price of the first iPhone SE. Apple has done this before.

To be fair, this wouldn’t be a remake of the SE, which was all about cramming up-to-date components into an old chassis. The Neo formula stresses the importance of an attractive design and looks to make sacrifices in other areas. So our iPhone Neo would look like a modern iPhone but feature older parts: maybe an A17 processor, an LCD screen, a 12MP camera, and similar outdated specs.

Would that be popular? Perhaps, and perhaps not. For one thing, we’d need to bear in mind that the context is different. Mac buyers were pleasantly surprised by the Neo’s price tag, which was unprecedented; whereas a $399 iPhone is, well, precedented. In fact, iPhones could be had for only slightly more than that (a mere $429) as recently as February last year. Nobody is going to be blown away by the idea of a $399 iPhone, particularly after the success of the MBN and the articles demanding a similarly budget-friendly iPhone.

Foundry

On the looks front, too, the context is different. The blush, citrus, and indigo color finishes of the MBN arrived as a breath of fresh air, an antidote to the aesthetic conservatism of the rest of the MacBook range. Apple identified an unoccupied niche and occupied it. But we’ve had colorful iPhones before. Sure, the Pro models display a sad and inexplicable lack of fun, but the iPhone 17 comes in sage and lavender, and the iPhone 16 in teal and pink. Color-starved Mac users needed a Neo model in a way that similarly inclined iPhone users do not.

But most fundamentally, I doubt Apple’s ability to deliver an externally attractive $399 iPhone in the current market without making serious compromises on the inside. We don’t officially know why the company discontinued the iPhone SE line last year, but the profit margin at that price was almost certainly a factor. Components are now more expensive in general, and using a binned processor would only help to a limited extent. Apple already uses them in the Neo, iPad mini, iPhone 17e, and other products, and budget smartphones generally sell in higher numbers than laptops, so we would quickly reach a point where the “free” chips start to run out, and the savings are lost.

Do I think customers like the idea of a $399 iPhone Neo? Of course. But do I think they would like the actual iPhone Apple would make at that price, reflecting component costs and the need to make a profit? No. Steve Jobs famously said that innovation is saying no to 1,000 things: turning down good ideas and focusing on the right ideas. The iPhone Neo is a lovely idea, but someone needs to say no.

On some Apple products, including the M4 iMac, MacBook Pro, and iPad Pro, a feature called nano-texture glass is available. This is something that was first introduced on Apple’s Pro Display XDR, before coming to other Apple products beginning with the long-discontinued 27-inch iMac. So, what is it, and should you spend hundreds more to have it adorn your screen?

What is nano-texture glass?

Glare is often a problem in brightly lit offices and homes, which can render the large, glossy displays little more than hugely elaborate mirrors. One option it to choose a display with a coating to give it a matte finish, but that is not without disadvantages.

Apple’s solution to the problem is nano-texture glass, which drastically reduces glare while avoiding the frostiness and washed-out colors that are often the compromise made when opting for a matte finish.

It’s all thanks to some clever design and a meticulous process that results in displays that can happily cope with bright light sources. The nano-texture glass surface is etched in such a way as to scatter the light that falls on it so that the image quality isn’t affected and the user experiences no glare and reflections.

How does nano-texture glass work?

One of the main causes of glare is light from lamps, windows, and other sources reflecting back at you due to the smooth surfaces of modern displays. Matte finishes combat this by having some kind of coating on the display that diffuses or breaks down the light due to its more angular surface. Sadly, this works both ways, so the light emanating from the display itself is also altered, resulting in the murkier results that usually accompany the technique.

Apple has taken things to the next level by foregoing a coating and instead physically altering the surface itself through tiny (nano) etchings. The pattern of the etchings means that light rays hitting the display are reflected off at a range of angles, eradicating most of the glare in the process.

The very clever part is that this somehow doesn’t seem to have much of an effect on the onscreen display. Of course, making all those microscopic etches in the glass is a precision job, which is why it costs more. For example, to get nano-texture glass on the iMac, you’ll need to get a higher-end model and pay an additional $200, while the cost for the M5 MacBook Pro is $150 and the M5 iPad Pro is $100 more than the standard glass (though it’s only available with 1TB or 2TB of storage). Add nano-texture glass to your Apple Studio Display and you’ll be paying an extra $300!

Apple

How can I clean nano-texture glass?

One of the quirks of Apple’s new Nano-texture glass display is that the company insists it should only be cleaned using a specific Apple cloth. One is included with every display, but we’re not entirely sure what magic ingredients make it such a special piece of fabric. in a scratch test performed by YourTube channel JerryRigEverything, scratches appeared with little effort on the nano-texture glass and began to file down “like a cheese grater on cheese” with less pressure than regular glass. He also found that regular cloths and paper towels performed well when cleaning the glass.

However, if you’ve just forked out a couple hundred bucks for a high-end display technology, it’s probably a good idea to follow Apple’s instructions and spend a little extra on a high-quality cloth.

How durable is nano-texture glass?

Nano-texture glass is as durable as standard glass. Since it doesn’t have a coating, there shouldn’t be any noticeable wear from regular use, however as noted by JerryRigEverything’s testing above, it does scratch easier than normal glass. His testing found that some objects that left no markings on regular glass created permanent marks on the nano-texture glass.

Which Apple devices have nano-texture glass options?

iPad Pro

The nano-texture glass is available with the 1TB and 2TB iPad Pro models, for an additional $100/£100 on the usual price.

MacBook Pro

The nano-texture glass is available with all MacBook Pro models, for an additional $150/£150 on the usual price. For some reason, adding nano glass is not an option when buying a MacBook Pro from Amazon.

iMac

The nano-texture glass is available with all but the cheapest iMac model. It’s an additional $200/£200 on the usual price.

Studio Display

Prepare to dig deep when adding nan-texture glass to Apple’s displays. The option is an additional $300/£300 on the usual price.

Studio Display XDR

In the case of Apple’s Studio Display XDR the nano-texture glass adds $300/£300 onto the price.

Should I get nano-texture glass on my Apple device?

The main reason for adding on the costly nano-texture glass feature is if you are struggling with glare—for example, if you use your iMac or Studio Display in a room with bright overhead lights or work outside on your iPad Pro. You will lose some contrast at certain angles, but if you’re consistently struggling to see your screen in bright light, or need to be absolutely confident that colors appear accurately, it will definitely be worth the money.

iPad Pro users will be interested in ano-texture glass as it offers a better tactile feel for artists and note-takers that leads to a superior writing and drawing experience by providing a subtle texture that mimics paper better than slippery glass.

Fingerprints and oil smudges on matte displays are also less noticeable compared to glossy displays.

Google isn’t shy about experimenting with wacky concepts. The company is well known for releasing and killing dozens of products each year, with its virtual graveyard now housing more than 300 of them. Its latest public beta test arrived this week: an AI-powered Chromebook dubbed the Googlebook.

Googlebooks, not to be confused with Google Books, Alphabet’s ebook storefront, are a new line of premium laptops with Gemini Intelligence at their core. Launching this fall, the devices will offer five distinct features in what Google hopes will set a new standard in desktop computing. The whole concept appears to be a response to the threat Apple’s MacBook Neo poses, updating the Chromebook brand with modern architecture and features. 

A closer look at Google’s announcement and marketing materials, however, reveals how the new brand suffers from an identity crisis. The Googlebook seems to be missing a clear direction or purpose, and it risks further increasing the decades-old device fragmentation that plagues Android. With Chromebooks, customers knew what they were getting, but with the Googlebook, that’s not really the case.

Rather than keeping users from jumping to Apple, Google seems to be making the decision to buy a MacBook Neo easier than ever.

Sticky software situation

Like the Chromebook, the Googlebook’s key selling point is its software. The laptop will run an upgraded variant of ChromeOS, featuring native AI integrations. The marquee feature, according to Google, is Magic Pointer, which triggers Gemini to answer questions and perform tasks. So, if you circle a date in an email, for example, you’ll be able to directly add a relevant event in the Calendar app. You could also mouse over multiple images and have Gemini generate a mashup, or hover over a series of numbers to instantly create a chart.

Google

It’s all very slick, but Magic Pointer isn’t really an original concept. macOS has long allowed users to instantly create Calendar events by selecting dates detected in text and images. And Apple Intelligence already allows you to inquire about on-screen elements using the native ChatGPT integration (and soon, new Siri). As for fusing images using AI, most desktop users don’t need a tool like this on a daily basis, and the ones who do could easily upload the desired images to ChatGPT or Gemini and prompt them to make the needed adjustments.

Beyond AI, the Googlebook’s OS is essentially an AI-upgraded version of ChromeOS. As such, it suffers from the same main restrictions found in Chromebooks, which include the limited library of professional desktop tools, while alienating users who need a stripped-down, lightweight UI. It’s not the comprehensive desktop operating system you get with a MacBook Neo.

It’s also worth noting that the Googlebook will require an active internet connection for the AI features to work. This suggests that the Magic Pointer could’ve easily been implemented in existing Chromebook models through a basic OS update. The new brand seemingly doesn’t bundle any meaningful hardware upgrades that warrant the exclusivity. It’s almost like Google is desperately searching for new ways to force the AI buzzword onto its products.

AI-designed widgets

The second Googlebook highlight is support for creating custom widgets using AI. For instance, you could ask Gemini to build a widget for your upcoming vacation, which would compile personal data, including relevant reservations, photos, a countdown timer, and so on.

The MacBook Neo already supports desktop widgets, allowing users to add small data bites from their favorite apps. And users can create custom widgets that incorporate different elements using third-party apps. While macOS widgets may not be as intuitive or personalized as asking an AI chatbot, they work effectively. Plus, how often does one change their desktop layout and create or add new widgets?

Google

Limited phone mirroring

Speaking of software, Googlebooks also support nearby Android phones. MacBook Neo users are probably familiar with iPhone Mirroring, Apple’s version of the feature. With an iPhone nearby, you can easily access a live view of your notifications, Live Activities, apps, and widgets—right on your Mac’s screen.

Based on Google’s demo, Googlebook’s implementation of phone mirroring appears to be more restricted. While notification forwarding is supported, users seemingly can’t launch and interact with a virtual view of their phone. Instead, it limits you to opening apps installed on it. It’s more like app mirroring than phone mirroring, and it gives users less control over the actions they can perform on their smartphones using their laptops.

Wireless file access

Wireless file access is another Googlebook perk. The feature allows you to instantly browse your Android phone’s local files from your laptop. While handy, Apple already offers convenient file syncing and sharing, as well as an array of Continuity tools on iOS and macOS.

Many Apple users store all of their iPhone files on iCloud, which, by default, makes them and any tweaks they make available on their Macs at all times (and vice versa). For larger local files, AirDrop is a solid tool that utilizes Bluetooth and Wi-Fi Direct for swift data transfer. You can also copy and paste text and images between iOS and macOS, or drag and drop files between an iPad and a Mac. By opting for a MacBook Neo, you’re not really missing out on much here.

Google

Premium branding

The Googlebook’s final highlight is its premium build, which probably means they’ll cost more than the standard Chromebook. Even if they look and feel as good as a MacBook Neo, it’s doubtful Googlebooks will be able to undercut Apple’s laptop on price. 

That’s Google’s main advantage over the Neo. Many customers tolerate Chromebooks’ limitations because of their affordability. Giving Googlebooks a premium quality while maintaining the constrained operating system doesn’t justify the increased costs. 

And given that the MacBook Neo can already do everything a Googlebook can at a mere $599 (or $499 for students), it seems more likely that Google will be pushing people toward the Neo, not away from it.

While the higher-end MacBooks with M1/M2/M3/M4/M5 Pro and Max chips support multiple external displays, Apple’s lower-end range of MacBooks that use a standard M1 and M2 processor cannot natively connect more than one external monitor, and to do so the M3 has to have its lid closed. The MacBook Neo is also limited to just one external monitor.

This is a massive limitation for these entry-level Macs: M1 MacBook, M2 MacBook and MacBook Neo. Apple’s M3 MacBook Air models do support two external monitors but only if the MacBook has its lid closed in what is known as Clamshell Mode. The M3 MacBook Pro supports a similar feature if at least the macOS Sonoma 14.6 update is installed. We explain how to run dual external displays on an M3 MacBook in a separate article.

The solutions below, however, allow for more than two external displays on plain M1, M2 Macs and MacBook Neo plus M3 Macs with their lids open if you want it. The base M4/M5 MacBook Air and M4/M5 MacBook Pro models do natively support two displays with the lid open but if you want three or more displays for these MacBooks, then keep reading.

In each case, there’s a software download and a docking station, hub or adapter required. 

Later, we list our tested and recommended software and hardware solutions for adding more than one display to the plain M1, M2 and M3 Macs, plus MacBook Neo. You can jump straight to our list of the best DisplayLink docks if you know all about it. If not, read on a while.

The simplest solution is to get a USB graphics-enabled docking station or hub, sometimes called a DisplayLink Dock—and we’ve reviewed the best ones later in this article. USB graphics is a software-based technology (DisplayLink or InstantView) that compresses the video signals from the computer to the monitor, enabling you to connect multiple external displays to your M1/M2/M3 or Neo MacBook.

We cover the basics of how to connect your Mac to an external monitor.

Desktop Macs can be helped, too.

While the M1, M2 and Neo MacBooks natively support just one monitor, the desktop M1 Mac Mini and M2 Mac Mini do natively support up to two external monitors—one via the HDMI port and a second via USB-C. The M4 Mac mini supports up to three displays—two displays with up to 6K resolution at 60Hz over Thunderbolt and one display with up to 5K resolution at 60Hz over Thunderbolt or 4K resolution at 60Hz over HDMI.

Workaround: Install DisplayLink software drivers

You can use a combination of display technologies to get around the M1/M2/M3/Neo MacBooks’ single-monitor limitation. DisplayLink is the most common software solution that you pair with a compatible dock, and SiliconMotion’s InstantView is another. Note that the docks need to state DisplayLink or InstantView compatibility—you can’t just install DisplayLink drivers and hope they work with regular docks and hubs. Here, we’ll refer to them all as DisplayLink docks for brevity.

DisplayLink enable adapters or docks to output video over USB ports that would otherwise support only data connections, bypassing limitations on the number of screens a Mac can support natively (for example, the single-display limitation on base M1, M2, M3, and Neo Macs). Many multi-display docks use a combination of native USB-C Alternate Mode (native “Alt Mode” video output) and DisplayLink technology. This combination serves as a workaround to the M1/M2/M3/Neo platform supporting only a single external display via USB-C.

Note that DisplayLink requires a third-party driver to be installed on the Mac. In general, setup is straightforward. Some of the docks we review below offer the DisplayLink software when you first connect the dock to your Mac. The DisplayLink macOS app or DisplayLink Manager app are ways of enabling DisplayLink technology on macOS. The app is available as a standalone installer rather than through the mac App Store. There are download versions for macOS 26 Tahoe and earlier.

The initial InstantView setup is easier than DisplayLink with the hubs from Hyper and Satechi—but it suffers the same challenge that Apple’s software updates could disable it, which will entail installing a newer version and allowing the necessary security & privacy settings for screen recording, just as with DisplayLink. You can download the latest version of InstantView software here. The latest version supports macOS 26 Tahoe, 15 Sequoia, 14 Sonoma, 13 Ventura and 12 Monterey.

Neither software solution is complicated and both worked well in our tests as you can read below. There are some disadvantages to using DisplayLink and InstantView, which we explain in detail in the FAQ section below the dock chart, but none that should bother most users.

1. First, download the latest Mac DisplayLink driver. As stated above, some docks, do this for you but it’s always best to use the latest version.

DisplayLink Manager Graphics Connectivity App v. 15.1 is compatible with macOS Sonoma 14, Sequoia 15 and Tahoe 26. For macOS Ventura 13, you need version 15; and for Monterey 12, it’s version 1.11; for Big Sur 11, look for version 1.9, and v1.5 for Catalina 10.15. It can be managed via the DisplayLink icon in the Apple Menu bar.

Here’s the one fiddly part: you need to enable “Screen Recording” to allow the DisplayLink Manager app to capture pixels and send them to your USB peripheral.

This can be found in System Preferences under Privacy in Security & Privacy; navigate to Screen Recording in the list on the left, then tick the Screen Recording permission for DisplayLink Manager after unlocking the padlock using your admin password. You may need to quit and restart DisplayLink Manager afterward. Don’t worry, DisplayLink isn’t recording your screen—this just lets it do its magic enabling multiple screens.

Installation is straightforward; take a look at the instructions here. Older versions did not support laptops’ closed-display/Clamshell Mode, but 1.8.1 and later do support Clamshell Mode if the MacBook is running macOS 11 or later.

There’s an option in DisplayLink manager to “launch at startup”, or you can drag the DisplayLink Manager to your Login Items in Users & Groups.

2. Then connect the MacBook to a DIsplayLink docking station—the dock must support DisplayLink, as all the reviewed products listed below do.

3. For the first screen you can connect via the dock’s DisplayPort, HDMI or USB-C/Thunderbolt port, and this will be handled natively by the M1/M2 MacBook. If you need to, you can use a USB-C to HDMI or DisplayPort adapter.

The HDMI or DisplayPort output uses Alternate Mode (Alt Mode), and as it is basically a pipeline directly to the system’s native GPU, it will behave just like if you hooked up a USB-C to HDMI dongle to your laptop. This requires no user driver installation.

The second and third displays will rely on the DisplayLink software. DisplayLink uses an installed driver and the system CPU and GPU to convert graphics data on the system into data packets. That data is then sent over the cable as data packets and converted back to video information and output to the monitors via the DisplayLink chip in the docking station.

Which dock is best?

A docking station connects to your MacBook via Thunderbolt or USB-C. It then offers multiple ports that your laptop now has access to. These can include new display ports, such as HDMI, as well as Ethernet for wired Internet access, USB-C/Thunderbolt/USB-A ports at varying speeds, audio plugs, and card readers. A simpler hub or adapter has fewer ports but may have all the video or USB ports required.

The main thing to remember here is that the dock, hub or adapter needs to support either DisplayLink or InstantView for the extra multi-screen magic to work. Non-DisplayLink docking stations are great if your MacBook can handle the number of screens you desire but you need more ports and functionality.

Docking station and hub manufacturers are now actively marketing their products as solutions to the M1/M2/M3/Neo external display limitation—docks have to support DisplayLink to work with the software. All the docks and hubs reviewed below require either the DisplayLink download or another similar software solution, such as InstantView, but no further hardware adapter except for the dock or hub itself. And of course, these hubs offer the usual multi-port benefits as well as the external monitor solution.

The best multiscreen hubs and adapters for Neo, M1, M2, M3, M4 and M5 MacBooks

Below we have gathered the best dedicated hubs and docks for multiscreen M1/M2/M3/M4/M5/Neo. Note that most of these listed (and tested) below use USB-C rather than Thunderbolt, so don’t benefit from the MacBook’s potential pro-level 40-80Gbps data bandwidth but are usually cheaper. If you require bandwidth higher than 10Gbps, go for a DisplayLink-supporting Thunderbolt dock. The MacBook Neo has USB-C rather than Thunderbolt so is limited to 10Gbps anyway but can use the Thunderbolt docks, too if you like as USB-C and Thunderbolt are compatible..

We have tested DisplayLink docks that can support up to five external displays and some that max out at two, which we expect will be plenty enough screen space for most people. You can use a five-screen DisplayLink dock even if you need only two monitors, and use the spare ports for other purposes.

Plugable 5 Display USB-C Dock (UD-7400PD) – five 4K displays at 60Hz

Pros

• Supports up to five external displays at 4K 60Hz
• 3x 8K at 60Hz displays
• 11 ports
• 2x HDMI video ports
• 140W PD laptop charging
• 2.5Gb Ethernet

Cons

• No SD card reader
• North America only

Price When Reviewed: $279.95

Best Prices Today: $293.95 at Amazon$293.95 at Walmart$296.99 at B&H

• Connection: USB-C (10Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 5

Let’s begin with the DisplayLink dock that supports the most external displays: the Plugable UD-7400PD allows even M1 MacBook and Neo users to run up to five 4K displays at a 60Hz refresh rate. This is made possible by use of the latest Synaptics’ DisplayLink DL-7400 chipset. No other dock can match it. Although five displays is probably overkill for most users, financial and data analysts can’t have enough screens and will love it. You don’t have to add five displays, of course, but this dock is the one that will let you do so. It even offers something to the mighty M5 Max MacBook that can natively support four external displays; with the Plugable UD-7400PD it can move to five.

There are two HDMI ports (one HDMI 2.1 for 8K and one 2.0) plus three downstream USB-C ports to connect either those displays or other devices. There are two fast 10Gbps USB-A ports, speedy 2.5Gb Ethernet and an audio jack, but no SD card reader. At the front of the dock, one of the USB-C ports can output power to a connected device at 30W, which is perfect if you want to fast-charge an iPhone or even an iPad.

If you need faster bandwidth, the Satechi Thunderbolt 4 Docking Station with DisplayLink (reviewed below) boasts 40Gbps data transfer and supports four displays for the M3 MacBook Air (while shut in Clamshell Mode), but with it the M1 and M2 MacBooks are limited to three (one at 6K and two at 4K). 

IT managers will appreciate Plugable’s DockTag technology that works with the UD-7400PD, a web-based solution designed for hot-desking and real-time IT asset management in mixed-platform offices.

Read our full Plugable 5 Display USB-C Dock (UD-7400PD) review

Kensington EQ Thunderbolt 4 Dock with DisplayLink – three 4K displays at 60Hz for M1/M2/Neo, four for M3/M4/M5

Pros

• Supports up to four external displays at 4K 60Hz
• One or two displays at 6K 60Hz
• 16 ports, inc. two 40Gbps Thunderbolt 4
• 2x HDMI 2.0 video ports
• 2x DisplayPort video ports
• Two speedy SD card readers
• 96W laptop charging

Cons

• Only three displays for M1/M2/Neo
• 149W power supply

Price When Reviewed: $299.99

Best Prices Today: $260.99 at Amazon$260.99 at B&H$299.99 at Kensington

• Connection: Thunderbolt 4 (40Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 4

While plain M1/M2/Neo MacBooks are limited to three external displays using this dock when DisplayLink software is installed, M3/M4/M5 and M1/M2/M3/M4 Pro/Max MacBooks can connect to four 4K at 60Hz. Other docks reviewed here also allow M1 and M2 Macs to connect to three displays, but what we really like about the Kensington SD5900T is its fast 40Gbps Thunderbolt 4 bandwidth rather than the usual 10Gbps USB-C docks. At present, there are no 80Gps Thunderbolt 5 DisplayLink docks. Note that the Neo uses 10Gbps USB-C rather than Thunderbolt, so is limited to that speed, although it will still work with Thunderbolt docks.

Two other docks—the Satechi Thunderbolt 4 Docking Station with DisplayLink and Plugable TBT-6950PD, both reviewed below—also offer Thunderbolt 4, but the Kensington SD5900T offers more flexibility on video ports, as well as boasting a few more than the other two.

That Thunderbolt port connection also allows one of the three screens to be at 6K resolution (60Hz) while the other two via HDMI or DisplayLink will be 4K at 60Hz. Macs with a Pro or Max M-series chip can run two 4K/60Hz and two 6K/60Hz. Kensington sacrifices one of the potential Thunderbolt ports for an extra DisplayPort, while the Satechi and Plugable docks go with three downstream TB4 plus two HDMI. It does, however, offer an extra 10GBps/15W USB-C port at the front.

Its network port is 2.5Gb Ethernet compared to the 1Gb Ethernet on the Satechi and Plugable. It’s backwards compatible with Gigabit Ethernet so will work fine with standard wired networks.

If connecting to multiple monitors with the greatest flexibility is your principal goal, then the Kensington SD5900T is a great DisplayLink solution. If you want an extra 40Gbps Thunderbolt port, look to the Satechi and Plugable docks.

Read our full Kensington SD5900T EQ Thunderbolt 4 Quad 4K Dock with DisplayLink review

Satechi Thunderbolt 4 Docking Station with DisplayLink – three 4K displays at 60Hz for M1/M2/Neo, four for M3/M4/M5

Pros

• Supports up to four external displays at 4K 60Hz
• One display at 6K 60Hz
• 11 ports, inc. three 40Gbps Thunderbolt 4
• 2x HDMI 2.0 video ports
• Speedy SD card reader
• 96W laptop charging and 180W power supply

Cons

• Only three displays for M1/M2/Neo
• U.K. users need local power cable

Price When Reviewed: $299.99

Best Prices Today: $299.99 at Amazon$299.99 at B&H$299.99 at Satechi

• Connection: Thunderbolt 4 (40Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 4

The benefit of the Satechi Thunderbolt 4 Docking Station with DisplayLink is right there in its name: it’s a full 40Gbps Thunderbolt 4 dock rather than USB-C. That Thunderbolt port connection also allows one of the three screens to be at 6K resolution (60Hz) while the other two via HDMI will be 4K at 60Hz.

There are two HDMI 2.0 ports plus a generous three downstream Thunderbolt 4 ports (as well as one upstream TB4 to the laptop). It doesn’t host any extra USB-C ports but the three Thunderbolt 4 ports (40Gbps data transfer, 15W power output) are backwards compatible with USB-C. There are two fast 10Gbps USB-A ports, too, plus a UHS-II SD card reader, Gigabit Ethernet and an audio jack.

Like the similar Plugable TBT-6950PD dock, reviewed below, it offers one more Thunderbolt 4 port than the Kensington SD5900T reviewed above, but lacks a few of its other ports.

U.K. customers can buy direct from Satechi (with a small shipping fee) but will need to purchase a local power cable.

Satechi also sells a 12-port USB-C-based Triple 4K Display Docking Station that supports three 4K displays at 60Hz using DisplayLink. It is priced the same as the Satechi Thunderbolt DisplayLink Dock. Normally we’d always pick a Thunderbolt dock over USB-C but this one hosts a mix of DisplayPort and HDMI ports that offers a more flexible monitor choice than the Thunderbolt dock’s two HDMI and three TB4 ports. If you prefer DisplayPort for your monitor connection you should consider this USB-C dock although a simple USB-C to DisplayPort adapter will work the same magic on the TB dock—or choose the Kensington SD5900T that gives up one of its Thunderbolt ports for an extra DisplayPort.

Read our full Satechi Thunderbolt 4 Docking Station with DisplayLink review

Plugable Thunderbolt 4 Docking Station (TBT-6950PD) – three 4K displays at 60Hz for M1/M2/Neo, four for M3/M4/M5

Pros

• Supports up to four external displays at 4K 60Hz
• One display at 6K 60Hz
• 11 ports, inc. three 40Gbps Thunderbolt 4
• 2x HDMI 2.0 video ports
• Speedy SD card reader
• 96W laptop charging and 180W power supply

Cons

• Only three displays for M1/M2/Neo
• North America only

Price When Reviewed: $299.95

Best Prices Today: $279.95 at Amazon$279.95 at Walmart$319.99 at B&H

• Connection: Thunderbolt 4 (40Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 4

This dock is almost identical to the Satechi Thunderbolt 4 DisplayLink dock reviewed above. M1/M2/Neo Mac owners can connect up to three external displays, and M3 and M1/M2/M3/M4/M5 Pro and M1/M2/M3/M4 Max users can attach up to four monitors. The M5 Max doesn’t need help to support four external monitors.

The Thunderbolt port means one of the three screens can be at 6K resolution (60Hz) while the other two via HDMI will be 4K at 60Hz.

The USB ports are at least 10Gbps and the SD card reader is also fast at 312MBps.

The Plugable version has a few advantages over the Satechi: a slightly longer (1m vs 0.8m) Thunderbolt cable, Kensington lock slot and two-year warranty (vs 1 year from Satechi). For more video-port flexibility but one fewer Thunderbolt port, look at the Kensington SD5900T dock reviewed above.

Read our full Plugable Thunderbolt 4 Docking Station for 4K Quad Monitors review

WAVLINK USB-C DisplayLink (DL7400) Docking Station – four 4K displays at 60Hz for Neo/M1/M2/M3/M4/M5

Pros

• Supports up to four external displays at 4K 60Hz
• 2x 8K at 60Hz display
• 2.5Gb Ethernet
• 30W USB-C
• 14 ports
• 2x HDMI 2.0 video ports
• 2x DisplayPort video ports
• Speedy SD card readers
• 100W laptop charging and 160W power supply

Price When Reviewed: $279.99

Best Prices Today: $224.99 at Amazon$256.49 at Amazon Prime$279.99 at WAVLINK

• Connection: USB-C (10Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 4

While the Satechi and Plugable Thunderbolt DisplayLink docks support four displays for the M3 MacBook Air (while shut in Clamshell Mode), the M1 and M2 MacBooks are limited to three (one at 6K and two at 4K) using those docks. The Wavlink’s newer DL7400 chipset allows for even the M1 and M2 Macs to connect to four displays at impressive refresh rates: 1x 4K at 120Hz and 3x 4K at 60Hz.

As such, if you desire four displays to be hooked up to your Neo, M1 or M2 MacBook, the Wavlink dock is the better choice. There are three versions. the WL-UG75PD1-DH2 has two DisplayPort and two HDMI ports, while the WL-UG75PD1-4D2 has four DisplayPort and WL-UG75PD1-4H2 has four HDMI. Plugable’s use of the same chipset on its UD-7400PD dock, reviewed above, supports up to five displays but uses USB-C rather than dedicated video ports, which might mean buying adapter cables to link to non-USB-C displays.

The Wavlink DL7400 might lack the Satechi and Plugable docks’ faster Thunderbolt connection but it beats them on network speeds with a 2.5Gb Ethernet port—2.5 times faster if your network matches this (it’s backwards compatible with 1GbE).

The USB ports are at least 10Gbps and the SD and microSD card readers are also speedily rated at 312MBps.

Read our full WAVLINK USB-C DisplayLink (DL7400) Docking Station review

Wavlink Dual 4K DisplayPort & HDMI Adapter – two 5K displays at 60Hz

Pros

• Supports two external displays at 5K 60Hz
• 2x DisplayPort 1.4 video ports
• 2x HDMI 2.0 video ports

Cons

• No USB ports, Ethernet etc
• No passthrough laptop charging

Price When Reviewed: $79

Best Prices Today: $78.99 at Amazon

• Connection: USB-C (5Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 2

Also from Wavlink this simple, portable and affordable adapter doesn’t give you loads of extra USB ports, Ethernet or card readers like a hub or docking station would, but it offers four powerful video ports: two DisplayPort 1.4 and two HDMI 2.0.

Once you’ve installed the DisplayLink drivers, this means a Neo/M1/M2/M3 MacBook can run two extended displays at up to 5K at 60Hz using a combination of these video ports. You’d need to use both DisplayPort 1.4 ports for the maximum 5K resolution—the HDMI 2.0 ports max out at 4096-x-2160 at 60Hz.

Note that 5K is generally 5120×2880 pixels, which is a 16:9 aspect ratio. This Wavlink dock offers 5120×1440 that has the same 5120-pixel horizontal width, but it is a 32:9 “super ultrawide” aspect ratio known as 5K Ultrawide/Dual QHD (DQHD) or “5K2K”.

There’s no passthrough charging so you’ll need to use another of the MacBook’s Thunderbolt ports to keep the laptop powered up in use.

Plugable USB-C Dual HDMI Adapter – two 4K displays at 60Hz

Pros

• Dual 4K monitor support for M1/M2/M3/Neo Macs
• Quad 4K model available

Cons

• No USB ports, Ethernet etc
• No passthrough laptop charging (dual model)

Price When Reviewed: $95.95

Best Prices Today: $95.95 at Amazon$95.95 at Walmart$119.99 at B&H

• Connection: USB-C (5Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 2

Another simple one-function affordable adapter, the Plugable USB-C Dual HDMI Adapter (USBC-6950M), pictured below left, uses DisplayLink to enable dual 4K 60Hz displays for M1, M2 and Neo MacBooks with two HDMI ports. Like the Wavlink Dual 4K DisplayPort & HDMI Adapter it’s no dock but it does the multi-screen M1/M2/Neo job you require without fuss.

Plugable

There’s a slightly pricier (but still cheaper than a dock) version, the Plugable Dual 4K DisplayPort & HDMI Adapter (USBC-7400H4) pictured above right, that supports four external 4K displays at 60Hz and features 90W passthrough charging to the laptop.

Anker Prime Triple Display 14-in-1 Docking Station – two 4K displays at 60Hz plus one 8K/60Hz

Pros

• Supports three displays: two 4K 60Hz and one 8K 60Hz
• 14 ports, inc. 10Gbps USB-C & 2.5GbE
• Informative front display
• 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
• 3x 100W USB-C ports
• 140W PD laptop charging

Cons

• 160W power supply less than ideal
• Pricey for USB-C

Price When Reviewed: $299.99

Best Prices Today: $239.99 at Eufy US$299.99 at Amazon$299.99 at Anker

• Connection: USB-C (10Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 3

Anker calls on DisplayLink for this good-looking docking station to support up to three external 4K displays at an impressive 60Hz refresh rate—indeed the two HDMI ports support 4K at 60Hz, and the DisplayPort capable of 8K at 60Hz.

It includes a bunch of impressive non-display ports. It can fast-charge even the top-end 16-inch MacBook at a full 140W PD 3.1, and boasts three 100W USB-C ports at the front alongside an impressively informative smart display.

However, it’s let down somewhat by its weak overall maximum 160W power—enough for many docks but disappointing on a dock with 440W of possible power from its USB-C ports. A power supply of at least 240W would have been more useful.

This dock’s SD and MicroSD are also not the fastest at 104MBps rather than 312Mbps, as seen on some other docks. Its 2.5Gb Ethernet will be welcomed by users on a fast network, and provides future proofing for the rest of us.

Read our full Anker Prime Docking Station (14-in-1, Triple Display, DisplayLink) review

Alogic DX3 Triple 4K Display Universal Docking Station – three 4K displays at 60Hz

Pros

• Supports three external displays at 4K 60Hz
• 12 ports, inc. 10Gbps USB-C
• 3x DisplayPort 1.4 video ports
• Speedy SD and MicroSD card readers
• 100W laptop charging and 135W power supply

Price When Reviewed: $329.99

Best Prices Today: $329.49 at Alogic$376.99 at Target

• Connection: USB-C (10Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 3

This Alogic DisplayLink docking station supports up to three external 4K displays at an impressive 60Hz refresh rate and has an array of useful non-display ports. It can power the connected laptop at 100W and has a decent 135W external power supply so doesn’t require an extra USB-C charger.

The DisplayLink download link is clearly shown in the user manual, and instructions make sense—although you need a magnifying glass to read them!

The DX3 has three DisplayPort 1.4 ports but no HDMI, so you’ll need to add an adapter between dock and display if you prefer HDMI. As you’ll need to buy video cables anyway, this doesn’t matter as prices for straight cable and adapter cable are close enough.

This dock has two card readers: SD and MicroSD, both at top 312MBps UHS-II—allowing you to add inexpensive portable storage to your laptop setup.

It also has Gigabit Ethernet, four USB-A (one with 7.5W charging) and two 10Gbps USB-C (one 100W PD upstream to the laptop, and one 7.5W smaller device charging).

Reviewed below is Alogic’s DX2, which supports two 4K displays at 60Hz and lacks some of the other ports found on the DX3. if you just need two external monitors for your M1/M2/M3/Neo MacBook this may be a cheaper option.

Alogic DX2 Dual 4K Display Universal Docking Station – two 4K displays at 60Hz

Pros

• Supports two external displays at 4K 60Hz
• 10 ports
• 2x DisplayPort 1.4 video ports
• 65W laptop charging and 100W power supply

Cons

• No card reader

Price When Reviewed: $285.99

Best Prices Today: $248.09 at Amazon$265.99 at Target $285.99 at Alogic

• Connection: USB-C (10Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 2

While we prefer Alogic’s DX3, reviewed above, that supports up to three 4K displays and offers more ports and faster charging for not much more cost, the DX2 is fine if all you require is two top-end monitors connected to your mid-sized M1/M2/Neo MacBook.

It features two DisplayPort 1.4 ports, one 10Gbps USB-C with 7.5W charging, three 5Gbps USB-A ports (one with 7.5W), a 3.5mm audio jack and Gigabit Ethernet.

Plugable USB-C Dual 4K Display Docking Station (UD-6950PDH) – two 4K displays at 60Hz

Pros

• Dual 4K monitor support for M1/M2/M3/Neo Macs
• 13 ports
• 100W PD to laptop
• Fast SD card reader

Cons

• Not for fast data transfer
• North America only

Price When Reviewed: $179.95

Best Prices Today: $179.95 at Amazon$179.95 at B&H$194.99 at Walmart

• Connection: USB-C (5Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 2

If you don’t require full 40Gbps Thunderbolt, Plugable’s redesigned USB-C–based UD-6950PDH docking station plus free-to-download DisplayLink software can connect two extra 4K/60Hz displays to M1, M2, M3 and Neo Macs. While plain M3 MacBooks can already connect to two external displays, this DisplayLink dock allows plain M3 MacBooks to remain open with the two additional displays attached (otherwise the M3 laptop’s lid has to be closed). M4, M5 and M4 Pro MacBooks can already run two screens natively but using a dock saves the laptop’s built-in ports.

It features an impressive 13 ports including Gigabit Ethernet, SD and MicroSD card readers and five spare USB ports.

You won’t get data transfer any faster than 5Gbps so if you crave the full 40Gbps Thunderbolt bandwidth you should instead consider the more powerful Plugable Thunderbolt 4 Docking Station with DisplayLink, reviewed above.

You can use both of the dock’s HDMI ports or both DisplayPort or a mix of each, depending on your monitor requirements. Two video ports will always be left empty, but the flexibility is welcome.

No availability outside of North America has yet been announced.

Read our full Plugable USB-C Dual 4K Display Docking Station (UD-6950PDH) review

Hyperdrive Dual 4K HDMI 10-in-1 USB-C Hub – one 4K display at 60Hz, one 4K display at 30Hz

Pros

• Supports two external displays at 4K
• 10 ports, inc. 5Gbps USB-C and USB-A
• 100W passthrough laptop charging
• InstantView easier than DisplayLink

Cons

• Second 4K display is 30Hz rather than 60Hz
• Requires USB-C charger

Price When Reviewed: $199.99

Best Prices Today: $169.99 at Amazon$199.99 at Hyper

• Connection: USB-C (5Gbps)
• Software: InstantView
• Max screens: 2

The Hyperdrive Dual 4K HDMI 10-in-1 USB-C Hub doesn’t use DisplayLink and instead uses SiliconMotion’s InstantView.

Hyper says that it works “without having to download cumbersome drivers” but there is some software installation involved, and you need to allow InstantView access to your Privacy settings in System Preferences. You connect the hub or adapter to your M1/M2/Neo MacBook and find the HyperDisplay app that appears in a Finder folder sidebar. Double-click the macOS InstantView icon and follow the System Preferences instructions. Once this has been completed your MacBook will automatically recognize the adapter from then on.

It’s an easier solution than DisplayLink but with the same ability to allow M1, M2, M3 and Neo Macs to connect to multiple external displays.

This compact hub still includes 10 ports, including the all-important 2x HDMI. The first display at 60Hz is added via HDMI and DP Alt-mode and the second at 4K 30Hz through HDMI and InstantView.

Also included are Gigabit Ethernet, MicroSD card reader (UHS-I), 3.5mm audio jack, 2x 5Gbps USB-A, and one 5Gbps USB-C. A further USB-C PD port allows you to charge the connected laptop at up to 100W—handy as the hub itself uses up one of your laptop’s Thunderbolt ports.

Hyperdrive Dual 4K HDMI Adapter – one 4K display at 60Hz, one 4K display at 30Hz

Pros

• Supports two external displays at 4K
• 100W passthrough laptop charging
• InstantView easier than DisplayLink

Cons

• Second 4K display is 30Hz rather than 60Hz
• Requires USB-C charger

Price When Reviewed: $129.99

Best Prices Today: $129.99 at Amazon$129.99 at B&H$129.99 at Hyper

• Connection: USB-C (5Gbps)
• Software: InstantView
• Max screens: 2

This double-function hub is designed to provide two HDMI display ports for a MacBook M1/M2/M3/Neo, plus passthrough charging for the laptop. It doesn’t offer a bunch of other ports like its big brother, the Hyperdrive Dual 4K HDMI 10-in-1 USB-C Hub reviewed above. As a result, it is cheaper and is one of the most cost-effective solutions for adding multiple monitors to the limited plain M1/M2/M3 Macs.

Like the 10-in-1 reviewed above, it uses SiliconMotion’s InstantView rather than DisplayLink software to get past the limitation.

The first display at 60Hz is added via HDMI and DP Alt-mode and the second at 4K 30Hz through HDMI and InstantView.

If you require more ports, such as Gigabit Ethernet, card readers and USB ports, consider the Hyperdrive 10-in-1 or one of the other hubs or docks reviewed here..

Ugreen Revodok Pro 209 9-in-1 4K HDMI Docking Station – two 4K displays at 60Hz

Pros

• Supports two external displays at 4K 60Hz
• 9 ports, inc. 10Gbps USB-C and USB-A
• 100W laptop charging
• DisplayLink file on dock connection

Cons

• Requires USB-C charger
• No card reader

Price When Reviewed: $169.99

Best Prices Today: $125.99 at Amazon Prime$169.99 at Amazon$169.99 at Ugreen

• Connection: USB-C (10Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 2

If you don’t need three external screens, we like this USB-C dock—the Revodok Pro 209 9-in-1 4K HDMI Universal Docking Station—for its two HDMI and two DisplayPorts, which you can choose between when adding two displays to your M1, M2, M3 or Neo MacBook. This should suit most monitors, unless you prefer direct USB-C displays.

Its spare USB ports (2x USB-A and 1x USB-C) are fast (10Gbps) for data transfer, and another USB-C port can be plugged into a USB-C charger (not included, which is common with the docks reviewed here) and supply up to 100W of charging power to the connected laptop.

There’s also a Gigabit Ethernet port for fast, stable wired Internet access.

You need to install DisplayLink on your Mac—instructions above—and Ugreen has made this easy by adding the download files to your Mac when you first connect the dock.

Read a full Ugreen 9-in-1 USB-C dock review.

Alogic DV4 Universal Quad Display Docking Station – one 4K display at 60Hz, two HD displays

Pros

• Supports three external displays, one at 4K 60Hz
• 14 ports, inc. 5Gbps USB-C and USB-A
• 3x HDMI 2.0 and 1x DisplayPort 1.4 video ports
• 12W USB-C charging
• 85W PD laptop charging

Cons

• 2 displays at HD, not 4K
• Requires USB-C charger

Price When Reviewed: $199.99

Best Prices Today: $199.99 at Alogic

• Connection: USB-C (5Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 2

With third-party DisplayLink drivers, this dock will support up to three displays on a Mac. You can connect one 4K at 60Hz display (3840×2160 pixels) via either the DisplayPort or one of the HDMI ports. The other two displays via HDMI, however, are at a lesser HD (1920×1080) resolution, both at 60Hz.

There is a link to the DisplayLink download printed in the user manual, although the type in the manual is the smallest we’ve ever seen!

The specs aren’t quite as impressive as the Satechi Triple 4K Display Docking Station, with 5Gbps a maximum data-transfer rate, although charging wattage for USB-A (3.0) is up to 7.5W each and USB-C is up to 12W, which beats the Satechi.

However, it does boast both SD and MicroSD card readers for affordable portable storage options, although UHS-I rather than super-fast UHS-II. And, crucially, it’s cheaper, although you will need to add your own USB-C 100W PD charger, unlike the Satechi Triple 4K Dock.

Satechi USB-C Multimedia M1 Adapter – one 4K display at 60Hz, one 4K display at 30Hz

Pros

• Supports two external displays at 4K
• 6 ports, inc. 5Gbps USB-C and 2x 5Gbps USB-A

Cons

• Second 4K display is 30Hz rather than 60Hz
• Requires USB-C charger
• No passthrough laptop charging
• No card reader

Price When Reviewed: $104.99

Best Prices Today: $104.99 at Satechi$104.99 at Walmart$149.99 at B&H

• Connection: USB-C (5Gbps)
• Software: InstantView
• Max screens: 2

The Satechi USB-C Multimedia M1 Adapter uses InstantView rather than DisplayLink but the installation process is practically the same when you follow the manual.

It includes 2x HDMI ports: one of which can support a 4K display at 60Hz and the other at 30Hz.

It’s more than a mere display adapter, though, as it also boasts USB-C PD passthrough charging at up to 85W, one 5Gbps USB-C port, and two 5Gbps USB-A ports.

Although named after the M1 processor, it will also work with similarly limited M2 and M3 MacBooks, plus the MacBook Neo.

Alogic Dual 4K Universal Compact Docking Station – two 4K displays at 60Hz

Pros

• Supports two external displays at 4K 60Hz
• 7 ports, inc. 10Gbps USB-C and USB-A
• HDMI and DisplayPort versions
• 78W laptop charging

Cons

• Requires USB-C charger

Price When Reviewed: $219.99

Best Prices Today: $219.99 at Alogic

• Connection: USB-C (10Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 2

The Alogic Dual 4K Universal Compact Docking Station comes in two models—the CH2, which features two HDMI 2.0 ports; and the CD2, with two DisplayPort ports—so you can choose which best suits the external displays you already own.

Two external screens are probably enough for most people. If you require three, see the other hubs and docks reviewed here. Both screens can be up to 4K at 60Hz. Basic instructions are given on installing the DisplayLink software for M1, M2, M3 and Neo Macs.

This neat, compact dock doesn’t feature as many ports as others mentioned here but what it has are top-rated: both the USB-A and USB-C ports support 10Gbps data transfer. There is also a Gigabit Ethernet port and a UHS-II SD card reader.

A passthrough USB-C port—you need to add a suitably powerful charger—can handle 100W, although 22W is required by the dock so leaving 78W for laptop and device charging. The dock must be connected to the laptop to allow device charging.

EZQuest Ultimate Plus USB-C Multimedia Hub – one 4K display at 60Hz, one 4K at 30Hz, one HD

Pros

• Supports three external displays (2x 4K; 1x HD)
• VGA if you need it
• 12 ports, inc 4x 5Gbps USB-A
• 85W laptop charging

Cons

• Requires USB-C charger
• Second 4K display is 30Hz rather than 60Hz
• Third display is HD not 4K

Price When Reviewed: $159.99

Best Prices Today: $124.99 at B&H$159.99 at EZQuest

• Connection: USB-C (5Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 3

The EZQuest Ultimate Plus USB-C Multimedia Hub has two HDMI ports and a VGA port, and supports one 4K at 60Hz and one 4K at 30Hz via HDMI and 1080p HD via VGA. If you want three 4K displays, look instead at the Ugreen Triple Display Dock.

It also features 5Gbps USB-A ports, Gigabit Ethernet and card readers.

Like the Ugreen dock, it requires a USB-C charger for power and can pass through up to 85W to the connected MacBook, but connects via slower 5Gbps USB-C.

StarTech.com USB-C Hybrid Triple Monitor Docking Station – DisplayLink dock with video options

Pros

• Supports three external displays at 4K 60Hz
• 15 ports, inc. 10Gbps USB-C and USB-A
• 85W passthrough laptop charging

Cons

• No card reader
• DisplayPort didn’t work on our test Mac

Price When Reviewed: $231.99

Best Prices Today: $217.33 at Amazon$224.38 at Lenovo USA

• Connection: USB-C (10Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 3

This triple-monitor DisplayLink-based docking station is positively bristling with ports: 15 in total.

Most interesting to us here are the six video ports: 3x DisplayPort 1.4 and 3x HDMI 2.0. This doesn’t mean you can connect six displays but it does should give you flexible options for the type of connection that fit your displays. However, in testing we had no success linking via DisplayPort, which makes the extra options rather worthless. As such, we prefer the other docks and hubs reviewed above.

You need to download the DisplayLink drivers for your M1/M2/M3/Neo Mac. StarTech.com has a link and a video, or just follow our guide above.

As well as the half-dozen video ports are six USB ports: 2x USB-C (one at 10Gbps and one 5Gbps), plus 4x USB-A (one 10Gbps and three 5Gbps). The 5Gbps USB-C port can charge a connected device at 18W, enough to fast-charge an iPhone. One of the 5Gbps USB-A ports can charge at 7.5W.

Rounding off the many ports are Gigabit Ethernet and a 3.5mm Audio In-Out.

There’s no card reader to add portable storage but you could connect an adapter to one of the USB ports.

Baseus Nomos NU1 Spacemate Air – two 2.5K displays at 60Hz

Pros

• Supports three external displays at 4K 60Hz
• 12 ports, inc. 10Gbps USB-C
• 90W passthrough laptop charging
• 12 ports
• Compact and portable
• Built-in USB-C cable

Cons

• 2 displays at QHD, not 4K
• No power from USB ports
• Requires USB-C charger
• No card reader

Price When Reviewed: $199.99

Best Prices Today: $199.99 at Baseus

• Connection: USB-C (10Gbps)
• Software: DisplayLink
• Max screens: 3

In some ways this “dock” is more of a high-powered portable hub. It connects to the laptop via its built-in braided USB-C 2.6ft cable that can carry data at 10Gbps and power at 90W to the MacBook when connected to a wall charger.

Most desk-bound docks are weighed down by an external power brick, but the Baseus Spacemate is nimbler and can even draw enough power from the laptop to operate with power coming in.

When connecting two monitors via the Spacemate the resolution is limited to QHD (2560×1440 pixels) that is also called 2.5K to distinguish it from 4K (3840×2160) which most dual-screen DisplayLink docks offer.

There are six USB ports: four USB-A but just two 10Gbps USB-C ports and none that can output any real power to the connected devices.

Read our full Baseus Nomos NU1 Spacemate Air 12-in-1 (Mac) Docking Station review

External display specs for Apple’s current laptops

Here are the external display specs for Apple’s current laptops, and what our workarounds can offer:

• M1 MacBook Air, M2 MacBook Air and M2 MacBook Pro: Maximum one external display—read our workarounds below for up to five displays.
• MacBook Neo: Maximum one external display—read our workarounds below for up to five displays.
• M3 MacBook Air, M3 MacBook Air and M3 MacBook Pro: Maximum two external displays if MacBook lid is closed. Four or more using our workarounds.
• M2 Pro MacBook Pro and M3 Pro MacBook Pro: Maximum two external displays. Four or more using our workarounds.
• M4 MacBook Air, M5 MacBook Air, M4 MacBook Pro, M4 Pro MacBook Pro and M5 MacBook Pro: Maximum two external displays. Three or more using our workarounds, or five using DisplayLink on certain docks.
• M2 Max MacBook Pro, M3 Max MacBook Pro and M4 Max MacBook Pro: Maximum four external displays. Five using DisplayLink on certain docks.
• M5 Pro MacBook: Maximum three external displays. Four or more using our workarounds.
• M5 Max MacBook: Maximum four external displays. Five using DisplayLink on certain docks.

• 
  Foundry

However, there are ways around these plain M1/M2/M3 and Neo limitations, allowing you to run two or more external displays off your MacBook, which we will outline here. In each case, there’s a software download and a docking station, hub or adapter required. 

What you need to know about DisplayLink and InstantView