<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0"><channel><title>The New Yorker Radio Hour</title><link>https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/tnyradiohour</link><description>Profiles, storytelling and insightful conversations, hosted by David Remnick.</description><atom:link href="https://www.wnycstudios.org/feeds/shows/tnyradiohour" rel="self"/><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 06:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><ttl>600</ttl><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/raw/2018/12/WNYC_Studios_Podcast_RadioHour-FINAL_100_100.png"/><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><itunes:category text="News"><itunes:category text="News Commentary"/></itunes:category><itunes:category text="News"><itunes:category text="Politics"/></itunes:category><itunes:category text="Arts"><itunes:category text="Books"/></itunes:category><copyright>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</copyright><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords><itunes:summary>David Remnick is joined by The New Yorker’s award-winning writers, editors and artists to present a weekly mix of profiles, storytelling, and insightful conversations about the issues that matter — plus an occasional blast of comic genius from the magazine’s legendary Shouts and Murmurs page. The New Yorker has set a standard in journalism for generations and The New Yorker Radio Hour gives it a voice on public radio for the first time. Produced by The New Yorker and WNYC Studios. &#13;
 WNYC Studios is a listener-supported producer of other leading podcasts including Radiolab, On the Media, Snap Judgment, Death, Sex &amp; Money, Here’s the Thing with Alec Baldwin, Nancy and many more.   &#13;
© WNYC Studios</itunes:summary><itunes:subtitle>David Remnick is joined by The New Yorker’s award-winning writers, editors and artists to present a weekly mix of profiles, storytelling, and insightful conversations about the issues that matter — plus an occasional blast of comic genius from the magazin</itunes:subtitle><itunes:owner><itunes:email>wnycdigital@gmail.com</itunes:email><itunes:name>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:name></itunes:owner><item><title>Beyoncé Takes the Stage
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/beyonce-takes-stage-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;This summer, the most anticipated tour (in close contest with Taylor Swift) is Beyoncé’s tour for her seventh studio album, “Renaissance,” which came out in 2022. Her previous record “was about the turbulence of [her] marriage and was in some ways a monument to marriage as an institution,” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; music critic Carrie Battan tells David Remnick. “Renaissance”—a homage to club music and queer culture—“is about breaking free of all of those chains. It’s about going to the club, and quitting your job and dancing and experiencing the ultimate freedom.” Battan talks through her favorite tracks on the record. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">76d3b954-c453-4821-96a0-8df799c7d439</guid><enclosure length="9072000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour070423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1340036"/><category>arts</category><category>beyonce</category><category>music</category><category>national_news</category><category>pop_music</category><category>renaissance</category><category>tour</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour070423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1340036"/><media:description type="plain">Beyoncé Takes the Stage
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/06/TNYradiohour063023.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>9:27</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>This summer, the most anticipated tour (in close contest with Taylor Swift) is Beyoncé’s tour for her seventh studio album, “Renaissance,” which came out in 2022. Her previous record “was about the turbulence of [her] marriage and was in some ways a monument to marriage as an institution,” </span><i><span>The</span></i> <i><span>New Yorker’s</span></i><span> music critic Carrie Battan tells David Remnick. “Renaissance”—a homage to club music and queer culture—“is about breaking free of all of those chains. It’s about going to the club, and quitting your job and dancing and experiencing the ultimate freedom.” Battan talks through her favorite tracks on the record. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Beyoncé Takes the Stage</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>This summer, the most anticipated tour (in close contest with Taylor Swift) is Beyoncé’s tour for her seventh studio album, “Renaissance,” which came out in 2022. Her previous record “was about the turbulence of [her] marriage and was in some ways a monument to marriage as an institution,” </span><i><span>The</span></i> <i><span>New Yorker’s</span></i><span> music critic Carrie Battan tells David Remnick. “Renaissance”—a homage to club music and queer culture—“is about breaking free of all of those chains. It’s about going to the club, and quitting your job and dancing and experiencing the ultimate freedom.” Battan talks through her favorite tracks on the record. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>This summer, the most anticipated tour (in close contest with Taylor Swift) is Beyoncé’s tour for her seventh studio album, “Renaissance,” which came out in 2022. Her previous record “was about the turbulence of [her] marriage and was in some ways a monument to marriage as an institution,” The New Yorker’s music critic Carrie Battan tells David Remnick. “Renaissance”—a homage to club music and queer culture—“is about breaking free of all of those chains. It’s about going to the club, and quitting your job and dancing and experiencing the ultimate freedom.” Battan talks through her favorite tracks on the record.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Russia’s No-Good, Very Failed Coup, and Jill Lepore on Amending the Constitution
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/russias-no-good-very-failed-coup-and-jill-lepore-amending-constitution/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Yevgeny Prigozhin’s march on Moscow last weekend, which killed more than a dozen Russian soldiers, fizzled as quickly as it began, but its repercussions are just beginning. The Wagner Group commander issued a video from Belarus claiming that he did not attempt a coup against Putin but a protest against the Defense Ministry.  David Remnick talks with Masha Gessen and the contributor Joshua Yaffa, who has written on the Wagner Group, about what lies ahead in Russia. Both feel that by revealing the reality of the war to his own following—a Putin-loyal, nationalist audience—Prigozhin has seriously damaged the regime’s credibility. If an uprising removes Putin from power, “there will be chaos,” Gessen notes. “Nobody knows what happens next. There’s no succession plan.”  Plus, Jill Lepore on amending the Constitution: suggesting a constitutional amendment these days is so far-fetched, it’s almost a punch line, but the Framers intended the document to be regularly amended, the historian Jill Lepore tells David Remnick. She argues that the failure to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment sank the country into a political quagmire from which it has not arisen, and her latest historial project brings awareness to the problem of amendability.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e55f4f15-2853-409c-b132-1e06b78b90aa</guid><enclosure length="39648000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour063023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1340034"/><category>constitution</category><category>equal_rights_amendment</category><category>national_news</category><category>politics</category><category>protests</category><category>russia</category><category>vladimir_putin</category><category>wagner_group</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour063023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1340034"/><media:description type="plain">Russia’s No-Good, Very Failed Coup, and Jill Lepore on Amending the Constitution
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/06/PUTIN_AP23176518021328.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>41:18</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Yevgeny Prigozhin’s march on Moscow last weekend, which killed more than a dozen Russian soldiers, fizzled as quickly as it began, but its repercussions are just beginning. The Wagner Group commander issued a video from Belarus claiming that he did not attempt a coup against Putin but a protest against the Defense Ministry.  David Remnick talks with Masha Gessen and the contributor Joshua Yaffa, who has written on the Wagner Group, about what lies ahead in Russia. Both feel that by revealing the reality of the war to his own following—a Putin-loyal, nationalist audience—Prigozhin has seriously damaged the regime’s credibility. If an uprising removes Putin from power, “there will be chaos,” Gessen notes. “Nobody knows what happens next. There’s no succession plan.”  Plus, Jill Lepore on amending the Constitution: suggesting a constitutional amendment these days is so far-fetched, it’s almost a punch line, but the Framers intended the document to be regularly amended, the historian Jill Lepore tells David Remnick. She argues that the failure to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment sank the country into a political quagmire from which it has not arisen, and her latest historial project brings awareness to the problem of amendability.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Russia’s No-Good, Very Failed Coup, and Jill Lepore on Amending the Constitution</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Yevgeny Prigozhin’s march on Moscow last weekend, which killed more than a dozen Russian soldiers, fizzled as quickly as it began, but its repercussions are just beginning. The Wagner Group commander issued a video from Belarus claiming that he did not attempt a coup against Putin but a protest against the Defense Ministry.  David Remnick talks with Masha Gessen and the contributor Joshua Yaffa, who has written on the Wagner Group, about what lies ahead in Russia. Both feel that by revealing the reality of the war to his own following—a Putin-loyal, nationalist audience—Prigozhin has seriously damaged the regime’s credibility. If an uprising removes Putin from power, “there will be chaos,” Gessen notes. “Nobody knows what happens next. There’s no succession plan.”  Plus, Jill Lepore on amending the Constitution: suggesting a constitutional amendment these days is so far-fetched, it’s almost a punch line, but the Framers intended the document to be regularly amended, the historian Jill Lepore tells David Remnick. She argues that the failure to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment sank the country into a political quagmire from which it has not arisen, and her latest historial project brings awareness to the problem of amendability.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Yevgeny Prigozhin’s march on Moscow last weekend, which killed more than a dozen Russian soldiers, fizzled as quickly as it began, but its repercussions are just beginning. The Wagner Group commander issued a video from Belarus claiming that he did not attempt a coup against Putin but a protest against the Defense Ministry.  David Remnick talks with Masha Gessen and the contributor Joshua Yaffa, who has written on the Wagner Group, about what lies ahead in Russia. Both feel that by revealing the reality of the war to his own following—a Putin-loyal, nationalist audience—Prigozhin has seriously damaged the regime’s credibility. If an uprising removes Putin from power, “there will be chaos,” Gessen notes. “Nobody knows what happens next. There’s no succession plan.”  Plus, Jill Lepore on amending the Constitution: suggesting a constitutional amendment these days is so far-fetched, it’s almost a punch line, but the Framers intended the document to be regularly amended, the historian Jill Lepore tells David Remnick. She argues that the failure to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment sank the country into a political quagmire from which it has not arisen, and her latest historial project brings awareness to the problem of amendability.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Jonathan Mitchell, a Prominent Anti-Abortion Lawyer, on Restraining the Power of the Supreme Court
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/jonathan-mitchell-prominent-anti-abortion-lawyer-restraining-power-supreme-court-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In recent years, the attorney Jonathan Mitchell has become a crucial figure in the anti-abortion movement. Advising a Texas state senator, Mitchell developed Texas’s S.B. 8 legislation, which allows for civil lawsuits against individuals who have helped facilitate an abortion—acts like driving a patient to an appointment. The law was crafted to evade review by the Supreme Court in the period before Dobbs ended the precedent of Roe v. Wade. Opponents of the law have called it state-sponsored vigilantism. Mitchell is now representing a man seeking millions of dollars in civil damages from friends of his ex-wife—who helped her access abortion medication—in a wrongful death lawsuit. And yet, despite his conservative politics, Mitchell has something in common with some legal thinkers on the left: a critique of the Supreme Court and its extraordinary power. As an opponent of the belief in judicial supremacy, Mitchell asks, “Why should it be the Supreme Court and not Congress?” to have the last word on what the Constitution means. “Why should it be the Supreme Court and not a state legislature that might have a different view?” Mitchell rarely gives interviews, but he agreed to speak with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; contributor, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jeannie-suk"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jeannie Suk Gersen&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, a professor at Harvard Law School who clerked for the former Supreme Court Justice David Souter.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">93236f13-af8e-4e22-9db6-2f7e1f8f2ba7</guid><enclosure length="16384000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour062723_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1337950"/><category>abortion</category><category>health</category><category>law</category><category>national_news</category><category>politics</category><category>protests</category><category>science</category><category>social_justice</category><category>supreme_court</category><category>texas</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour062723_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1337950"/><media:description type="plain">Jonathan Mitchell, a Prominent Anti-Abortion Lawyer, on Restraining the Power of the Supreme Court
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/06/AP22167519392738_AbortionTexas.png" width="130"/><itunes:duration>17:04</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>In recent years, the attorney Jonathan Mitchell has become a crucial figure in the anti-abortion movement. Advising a Texas state senator, Mitchell developed Texas’s S.B. 8 legislation, which allows for civil lawsuits against individuals who have helped facilitate an abortion—acts like driving a patient to an appointment. The law was crafted to evade review by the Supreme Court in the period before Dobbs ended the precedent of Roe v. Wade. Opponents of the law have called it state-sponsored vigilantism. Mitchell is now representing a man seeking millions of dollars in civil damages from friends of his ex-wife—who helped her access abortion medication—in a wrongful death lawsuit. And yet, despite his conservative politics, Mitchell has something in common with some legal thinkers on the left: a critique of the Supreme Court and its extraordinary power. As an opponent of the belief in judicial supremacy, Mitchell asks, “Why should it be the Supreme Court and not Congress?” to have the last word on what the Constitution means. “Why should it be the Supreme Court and not a state legislature that might have a different view?” Mitchell rarely gives interviews, but he agreed to speak with </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> contributor, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jeannie-suk"><span>Jeannie Suk Gersen</span></a><span>, a professor at Harvard Law School who clerked for the former Supreme Court Justice David Souter.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Jonathan Mitchell, a Prominent Anti-Abortion Lawyer, on Restraining the Power of the Supreme Court</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>In recent years, the attorney Jonathan Mitchell has become a crucial figure in the anti-abortion movement. Advising a Texas state senator, Mitchell developed Texas’s S.B. 8 legislation, which allows for civil lawsuits against individuals who have helped facilitate an abortion—acts like driving a patient to an appointment. The law was crafted to evade review by the Supreme Court in the period before Dobbs ended the precedent of Roe v. Wade. Opponents of the law have called it state-sponsored vigilantism. Mitchell is now representing a man seeking millions of dollars in civil damages from friends of his ex-wife—who helped her access abortion medication—in a wrongful death lawsuit. And yet, despite his conservative politics, Mitchell has something in common with some legal thinkers on the left: a critique of the Supreme Court and its extraordinary power. As an opponent of the belief in judicial supremacy, Mitchell asks, “Why should it be the Supreme Court and not Congress?” to have the last word on what the Constitution means. “Why should it be the Supreme Court and not a state legislature that might have a different view?” Mitchell rarely gives interviews, but he agreed to speak with </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> contributor, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jeannie-suk"><span>Jeannie Suk Gersen</span></a><span>, a professor at Harvard Law School who clerked for the former Supreme Court Justice David Souter.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>In recent years, the attorney Jonathan Mitchell has become a crucial figure in the anti-abortion movement. Advising a Texas state senator, Mitchell developed Texas’s S.B. 8 legislation, which allows for civil lawsuits against individuals who have helped facilitate an abortion—acts like driving a patient to an appointment. The law was crafted to evade review by the Supreme Court in the period before Dobbs ended the precedent of Roe v. Wade. Opponents of the law have called it state-sponsored vigilantism. Mitchell is now representing a man seeking millions of dollars in civil damages from friends of his ex-wife—who helped her access abortion medication—in a wrongful death lawsuit. And yet, despite his conservative politics, Mitchell has something in common with some legal thinkers on the left: a critique of the Supreme Court and its extraordinary power. As an opponent of the belief in judicial supremacy, Mitchell asks, “Why should it be the Supreme Court and not Congress?” to have the last word on what the Constitution means. “Why should it be the Supreme Court and not a state legislature that might have a different view?” Mitchell rarely gives interviews, but he agreed to speak with The New Yorker’s contributor, Jeannie Suk Gersen, a professor at Harvard Law School who clerked for the former Supreme Court Justice David Souter.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>A Year of Change for a North Dakota Abortion Clinic, and the Composer John Williams
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/year-change-north-dakota-abortion-clinic-and-composer-john-williams/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;A year ago, the staff writer Emily Witt visited Fargo, North Dakota, to report on the Red River Women’s Clinic—the only abortion provider in the state. The Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision had just come down, and the clinic was scrambling to move across state lines, to the adjacent city of Moorhead, Minnesota. This spring, Witt returned to talk with Tammi Kromenaker, the clinic’s director. Kromenaker says the clinic’s new home has had some notable upsides—a parking lot that shields patients from protestors, for example—but North Dakota patients are increasingly fearful as they reach out for care, afraid even to cross the state line for an abortion. Plus, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; Alex Ross discusses John Williams, who has written scores for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;generations of blockbusters, including “Jaws,” “Star Wars,” “Harry Potter,” and many films of Steven Spielberg. Ross considers him the last practitioner of Hollywood’s grand orchestral tradition, and his retirement will mark the end of an era in music: at ninety-one years old, Williams has said that his score for “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny” may be his last.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6d798848-0222-466b-adaf-f8e2d0c494d1</guid><enclosure length="30688000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour062323_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1337943"/><category>abortion</category><category>composer</category><category>dobbs</category><category>film</category><category>health</category><category>indiana_jones</category><category>john_wililams</category><category>national_news</category><category>politics</category><category>protests</category><category>religion_faith</category><category>roe_v_wade</category><category>science</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour062323_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1337943"/><media:description type="plain">A Year of Change for a North Dakota Abortion Clinic, and the Composer John Williams
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/06/TNYradiohour052323_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>31:58</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>A year ago, the staff writer Emily Witt visited Fargo, North Dakota, to report on the Red River Women’s Clinic—the only abortion provider in the state. The Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision had just come down, and the clinic was scrambling to move across state lines, to the adjacent city of Moorhead, Minnesota. This spring, Witt returned to talk with Tammi Kromenaker, the clinic’s director. Kromenaker says the clinic’s new home has had some notable upsides—a parking lot that shields patients from protestors, for example—but North Dakota patients are increasingly fearful as they reach out for care, afraid even to cross the state line for an abortion. Plus, </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> Alex Ross discusses John Williams, who has written scores for </span><span>generations of blockbusters, including “Jaws,” “Star Wars,” “Harry Potter,” and many films of Steven Spielberg. Ross considers him the last practitioner of Hollywood’s grand orchestral tradition, and his retirement will mark the end of an era in music: at ninety-one years old, Williams has said that his score for “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny” may be his last.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>A Year of Change for a North Dakota Abortion Clinic, and the Composer John Williams</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>A year ago, the staff writer Emily Witt visited Fargo, North Dakota, to report on the Red River Women’s Clinic—the only abortion provider in the state. The Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision had just come down, and the clinic was scrambling to move across state lines, to the adjacent city of Moorhead, Minnesota. This spring, Witt returned to talk with Tammi Kromenaker, the clinic’s director. Kromenaker says the clinic’s new home has had some notable upsides—a parking lot that shields patients from protestors, for example—but North Dakota patients are increasingly fearful as they reach out for care, afraid even to cross the state line for an abortion. Plus, </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> Alex Ross discusses John Williams, who has written scores for </span><span>generations of blockbusters, including “Jaws,” “Star Wars,” “Harry Potter,” and many films of Steven Spielberg. Ross considers him the last practitioner of Hollywood’s grand orchestral tradition, and his retirement will mark the end of an era in music: at ninety-one years old, Williams has said that his score for “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny” may be his last.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>A year ago, the staff writer Emily Witt visited Fargo, North Dakota, to report on the Red River Women’s Clinic—the only abortion provider in the state. The Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision had just come down, and the clinic was scrambling to move across state lines, to the adjacent city of Moorhead, Minnesota. This spring, Witt returned to talk with Tammi Kromenaker, the clinic’s director. Kromenaker says the clinic’s new home has had some notable upsides—a parking lot that shields patients from protestors, for example—but North Dakota patients are increasingly fearful as they reach out for care, afraid even to cross the state line for an abortion. Plus, The New Yorker’s Alex Ross discusses John Williams, who has written scores for generations of blockbusters, including “Jaws,” “Star Wars,” “Harry Potter,” and many films of Steven Spielberg. Ross considers him the last practitioner of Hollywood’s grand orchestral tradition, and his retirement will mark the end of an era in music: at ninety-one years old, Williams has said that his score for “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny” may be his last.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Singer-songwriter Joy Oladokun, Plus Bryan Washington
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/singer-songwriter-joy-oladokun-plus-bryan-washington/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The singer-songwriter Joy Oladokun recently released her fourth album, called “Proof of Life.” Raised near Phoenix, Oladokun had aspirations of becoming a preacher before turning to music in earnest. Like many of the great songwriters, she has a way of staring down the hardest parts of life with an offbeat sort of wit. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/hanif-abdurraqib"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Hanif Abdurraqib&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; calls her a “writer’s writer,” someone “interested in the lyric as an opportunity to build narrative worlds.” Oladokun talked with him about seeing a video of Tracy Chapman performing in a Nelson Mandela tribute concert: “I was ten years old, watching someone who looked like me play the guitar,” she recalls. “I asked my parents for a guitar that Christmas.” Chapman remained a lasting influence on her as an artist. “You could just tell that what drove her to open her mouth in the first place was conviction. Belief in her values and belief that if people would only think about this, it would change the world.” While in New York on tour, Oladokun performed “Trying” and “Keeping the Light On”—both from her new record—live at WNYC. Plus, the fiction writer Bryan Washington on the joys of a Houston ice house. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d965959f-9084-4124-937a-587f30ce1f06</guid><enclosure length="25584000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour062023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1336064"/><category>gospel</category><category>guitar</category><category>houston</category><category>ice_house</category><category>joy_oladokun</category><category>live_performance</category><category>music</category><category>songwriter</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour062023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1336064"/><media:description type="plain">Singer-songwriter Joy Oladokun, Plus Bryan Washington
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/06/JoyOladukon_AP22170190980100.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>26:39</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The singer-songwriter Joy Oladokun recently released her fourth album, called “Proof of Life.” Raised near Phoenix, Oladokun had aspirations of becoming a preacher before turning to music in earnest. Like many of the great songwriters, she has a way of staring down the hardest parts of life with an offbeat sort of wit. </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i> <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/hanif-abdurraqib"><span>Hanif Abdurraqib</span></a><span> calls her a “writer’s writer,” someone “interested in the lyric as an opportunity to build narrative worlds.” Oladokun talked with him about seeing a video of Tracy Chapman performing in a Nelson Mandela tribute concert: “I was ten years old, watching someone who looked like me play the guitar,” she recalls. “I asked my parents for a guitar that Christmas.” Chapman remained a lasting influence on her as an artist. “You could just tell that what drove her to open her mouth in the first place was conviction. Belief in her values and belief that if people would only think about this, it would change the world.” While in New York on tour, Oladokun performed “Trying” and “Keeping the Light On”—both from her new record—live at WNYC. Plus, the fiction writer Bryan Washington on the joys of a Houston ice house. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Singer-songwriter Joy Oladokun, Plus Bryan Washington</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The singer-songwriter Joy Oladokun recently released her fourth album, called “Proof of Life.” Raised near Phoenix, Oladokun had aspirations of becoming a preacher before turning to music in earnest. Like many of the great songwriters, she has a way of staring down the hardest parts of life with an offbeat sort of wit. </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i> <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/hanif-abdurraqib"><span>Hanif Abdurraqib</span></a><span> calls her a “writer’s writer,” someone “interested in the lyric as an opportunity to build narrative worlds.” Oladokun talked with him about seeing a video of Tracy Chapman performing in a Nelson Mandela tribute concert: “I was ten years old, watching someone who looked like me play the guitar,” she recalls. “I asked my parents for a guitar that Christmas.” Chapman remained a lasting influence on her as an artist. “You could just tell that what drove her to open her mouth in the first place was conviction. Belief in her values and belief that if people would only think about this, it would change the world.” While in New York on tour, Oladokun performed “Trying” and “Keeping the Light On”—both from her new record—live at WNYC. Plus, the fiction writer Bryan Washington on the joys of a Houston ice house. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The singer-songwriter Joy Oladokun recently released her fourth album, called “Proof of Life.” Raised near Phoenix, Oladokun had aspirations of becoming a preacher before turning to music in earnest. Like many of the great songwriters, she has a way of staring down the hardest parts of life with an offbeat sort of wit. The New Yorker’s Hanif Abdurraqib calls her a “writer’s writer,” someone “interested in the lyric as an opportunity to build narrative worlds.” Oladokun talked with him about seeing a video of Tracy Chapman performing in a Nelson Mandela tribute concert: “I was ten years old, watching someone who looked like me play the guitar,” she recalls. “I asked my parents for a guitar that Christmas.” Chapman remained a lasting influence on her as an artist. “You could just tell that what drove her to open her mouth in the first place was conviction. Belief in her values and belief that if people would only think about this, it would change the world.” While in New York on tour, Oladokun performed “Trying” and “Keeping the Light On”—both from her new record—live at WNYC. Plus, the fiction writer Bryan Washington on the joys of a Houston ice house.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Dexter Filkins on the Dilemma at the Border
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/dexter-filkins-dilemma-border/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Dexter Filkins has reported on conflict situations around the world, and recently spent months reporting on the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border. In a &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/06/19/bidens-dilemma-at-the-border"&gt;&lt;span&gt;recent piece&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, Filkins tries to untangle how conditions around the globe, an abrupt change in executive direction from Trump to Biden, and an antiquated immigration system have created a chaotic situation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; “It’s difficult to appreciate the scale and the magnitude of what’s happening there unless you see it,” Filkins tells David Remnick. Last year, during a surge at the border, local jurisdictions struggled to provide humanitarian support for thousands of migrants, leading Democratic politicians to openly criticize the Administration. While hardliners dream of a wall across the two-thousand-mile border, “they can’t build a border wall in the middle of a river,” Filkins notes. “So if you can get across the river, and you can get your foot on American soil, that’s all you need to do.” M&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;igrants surrendering to Border Patrol and requesting asylum then enter a yearslong limbo as their claims work through an overburdened system. The last major overhaul of the immigration system took place in 1986, Filkins explains, and with Republicans and Democrats perpetually at loggerheads, there is no will to fix a system that both sides acknowledge as broken. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ed8c802f-d67c-40b6-a5c5-80612b3c4b29</guid><enclosure length="22720000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour061623_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1336063"/><category>asylum</category><category>border</category><category>border_wall</category><category>immigration</category><category>national_news</category><category>politics</category><category>protests</category><category>racism</category><category>social_justice</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour061623_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1336063"/><media:description type="plain">Dexter Filkins on the Dilemma at the Border
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/06/TNYradiohour061623_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>23:40</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Dexter Filkins has reported on conflict situations around the world, and recently spent months reporting on the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border. In a </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/06/19/bidens-dilemma-at-the-border"><span>recent piece</span></a><span>, Filkins tries to untangle how conditions around the globe, an abrupt change in executive direction from Trump to Biden, and an antiquated immigration system have created a chaotic situation.</span><span> “It’s difficult to appreciate the scale and the magnitude of what’s happening there unless you see it,” Filkins tells David Remnick. Last year, during a surge at the border, local jurisdictions struggled to provide humanitarian support for thousands of migrants, leading Democratic politicians to openly criticize the Administration. While hardliners dream of a wall across the two-thousand-mile border, “they can’t build a border wall in the middle of a river,” Filkins notes. “So if you can get across the river, and you can get your foot on American soil, that’s all you need to do.” M</span><span>igrants surrendering to Border Patrol and requesting asylum then enter a yearslong limbo as their claims work through an overburdened system. The last major overhaul of the immigration system took place in 1986, Filkins explains, and with Republicans and Democrats perpetually at loggerheads, there is no will to fix a system that both sides acknowledge as broken. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Dexter Filkins on the Dilemma at the Border</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Dexter Filkins has reported on conflict situations around the world, and recently spent months reporting on the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border. In a </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/06/19/bidens-dilemma-at-the-border"><span>recent piece</span></a><span>, Filkins tries to untangle how conditions around the globe, an abrupt change in executive direction from Trump to Biden, and an antiquated immigration system have created a chaotic situation.</span><span> “It’s difficult to appreciate the scale and the magnitude of what’s happening there unless you see it,” Filkins tells David Remnick. Last year, during a surge at the border, local jurisdictions struggled to provide humanitarian support for thousands of migrants, leading Democratic politicians to openly criticize the Administration. While hardliners dream of a wall across the two-thousand-mile border, “they can’t build a border wall in the middle of a river,” Filkins notes. “So if you can get across the river, and you can get your foot on American soil, that’s all you need to do.” M</span><span>igrants surrendering to Border Patrol and requesting asylum then enter a yearslong limbo as their claims work through an overburdened system. The last major overhaul of the immigration system took place in 1986, Filkins explains, and with Republicans and Democrats perpetually at loggerheads, there is no will to fix a system that both sides acknowledge as broken. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Dexter Filkins has reported on conflict situations around the world, and recently spent months reporting on the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border. In a recent piece, Filkins tries to untangle how conditions around the globe, an abrupt change in executive direction from Trump to Biden, and an antiquated immigration system have created a chaotic situation. “It’s difficult to appreciate the scale and the magnitude of what’s happening there unless you see it,” Filkins tells David Remnick. Last year, during a surge at the border, local jurisdictions struggled to provide humanitarian support for thousands of migrants, leading Democratic politicians to openly criticize the Administration. While hardliners dream of a wall across the two-thousand-mile border, “they can’t build a border wall in the middle of a river,” Filkins notes. “So if you can get across the river, and you can get your foot on American soil, that’s all you need to do.” Migrants surrendering to Border Patrol and requesting asylum then enter a yearslong limbo as their claims work through an overburdened system. The last major overhaul of the immigration system took place in 1986, Filkins explains, and with Republicans and Democrats perpetually at loggerheads, there is no will to fix a system that both sides acknowledge as broken. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>From “On the Media”: Seditious Conspiracy
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/media-seditious-conspiracy/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;On January 6th, 2021, “On the Media” reporter Micah Loewinger recorded the secret communications of the Oath Keepers on a walkie-talkie app called Zello. After reporting on the findings, Loewinger received a subpoena calling on him to testify in the first Oath Keepers criminal trial last year. In conversations with “On the Media” host Brooke Gladstone, “Death, Sex &amp;amp; Money” host Anna Sale, and Roger Parloff, a senior editor at Lawfare, Loewinger grapples with the consequences of his reporting, and explores what happens when a journalist is forced to testify in court. Plus, Loewinger looks at the nineteen-seventies Supreme Court case United States v. Caldwell to understand the legal precedents for journalists being called on to testify in federal investigations, the limits of First Amendment privileges for the press, and the sometimes tenuous relationship between journalists and the government. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This episode originally aired on “On the Media” on May 26, 2023. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5a93be41-8d9a-4867-b55f-de934e9a985c</guid><enclosure length="34320000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour061323_podcastfix.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1333987"/><category>jan_6</category><category>national_news</category><category>news</category><category>on_the_media</category><category>politics</category><category>protests</category><category>social_justice</category><category>storytelling</category><category>technology</category><category>zello</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour061323_podcastfix.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1333987"/><media:description type="plain">From “On the Media”: Seditious Conspiracy
</media:description><itunes:duration>35:45</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>On January 6th, 2021, “On the Media” reporter Micah Loewinger recorded the secret communications of the Oath Keepers on a walkie-talkie app called Zello. After reporting on the findings, Loewinger received a subpoena calling on him to testify in the first Oath Keepers criminal trial last year. In conversations with “On the Media” host Brooke Gladstone, “Death, Sex &amp; Money” host Anna Sale, and Roger Parloff, a senior editor at Lawfare, Loewinger grapples with the consequences of his reporting, and explores what happens when a journalist is forced to testify in court. Plus, Loewinger looks at the nineteen-seventies Supreme Court case United States v. Caldwell to understand the legal precedents for journalists being called on to testify in federal investigations, the limits of First Amendment privileges for the press, and the sometimes tenuous relationship between journalists and the government. </span></p>
<p><i><span>This episode originally aired on “On the Media” on May 26, 2023. </span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>From “On the Media”: Seditious Conspiracy</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>On January 6th, 2021, “On the Media” reporter Micah Loewinger recorded the secret communications of the Oath Keepers on a walkie-talkie app called Zello. After reporting on the findings, Loewinger received a subpoena calling on him to testify in the first Oath Keepers criminal trial last year. In conversations with “On the Media” host Brooke Gladstone, “Death, Sex &amp; Money” host Anna Sale, and Roger Parloff, a senior editor at Lawfare, Loewinger grapples with the consequences of his reporting, and explores what happens when a journalist is forced to testify in court. Plus, Loewinger looks at the nineteen-seventies Supreme Court case United States v. Caldwell to understand the legal precedents for journalists being called on to testify in federal investigations, the limits of First Amendment privileges for the press, and the sometimes tenuous relationship between journalists and the government. </span></p>
<p><i><span>This episode originally aired on “On the Media” on May 26, 2023. </span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>On January 6th, 2021, “On the Media” reporter Micah Loewinger recorded the secret communications of the Oath Keepers on a walkie-talkie app called Zello. After reporting on the findings, Loewinger received a subpoena calling on him to testify in the first Oath Keepers criminal trial last year. In conversations with “On the Media” host Brooke Gladstone, “Death, Sex &amp;amp; Money” host Anna Sale, and Roger Parloff, a senior editor at Lawfare, Loewinger grapples with the consequences of his reporting, and explores what happens when a journalist is forced to testify in court. Plus, Loewinger looks at the nineteen-seventies Supreme Court case United States v. Caldwell to understand the legal precedents for journalists being called on to testify in federal investigations, the limits of First Amendment privileges for the press, and the sometimes tenuous relationship between journalists and the government.  This episode originally aired on “On the Media” on May 26, 2023. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The New York Times’ Publisher on the Future of Journalism, and the Poet Paul Tran
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/new-york-times-publisher-future-journalism-and-poet-paul-tran/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Over the past several years, as more democratic institutions and norms have come under attack, many journalists have raised the question of whether it is ethical to adhere to journalism’s traditional principles of non-bias, objectivity, and political neutrality. In May, A. G. Sulzberger, the publisher of the New York &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Times&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;, staked out his position in the traditionalist camp in &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.cjr.org/special_report/ag-sulzberger-new-york-times-journalisms-essential-value-objectivity-independence.php"&gt;&lt;span&gt;an essay&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; for the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Columbia Journalism Review&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;. “The traditionalists in the ranks have long believed that their long-standing view speaks for itself. I became increasingly convinced that the argument doesn’t make itself,” he tells David Remnick. Sulzberger shies away from the term objectivity, instead describing the “posture of independence” as one that prizes “an open mind, a skeptical mind,” and a clear-eyed pursuit of truth––even if it leads to uncomfortable conclusions. Sulzberger, whose family has owned the paper since 1896, says he wants to push back on a culture of “certitude” in journalism. “In this hyper-politicized, hyper-polarized moment, is society benefiting from every single player getting deeper and deeper, and louder and louder, about declaring their personal allegiances and loyalties and preferences?” he asks.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, this week’s issue of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; features a new poem by Paul Tran, a young writer whose début collection was named one of the best books of 2022. The poem, “The Three Graces,” takes its name from a rock formation near Colorado Springs. “I was curious: what would these three rocks have to say about the nature of love,” Tran tells the producer Jeffrey Masters. Tran’s poetry explores their personal history—their family immigrated to the United States from Vietnam—as well as their trans identity. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">39cc9956-c1bc-413d-81d7-235b57327f49</guid><enclosure length="48096000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour060923_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1333989"/><category>journalism</category><category>media</category><category>national_news</category><category>news</category><category>paul_tran</category><category>poetry</category><category>poetry_reading</category><category>politics</category><category>protests</category><category>racism</category><category>the_new_york_times</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour060923_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1333989"/><media:description type="plain">The New York Times’ Publisher on the Future of Journalism, and the Poet Paul Tran
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/06/tnyradiohour060923_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>50:06</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Over the past several years, as more democratic institutions and norms have come under attack, many journalists have raised the question of whether it is ethical to adhere to journalism’s traditional principles of non-bias, objectivity, and political neutrality. In May, A. G. Sulzberger, the publisher of the New York </span><i><span>Times</span></i><span>, staked out his position in the traditionalist camp in </span><a href="https://www.cjr.org/special_report/ag-sulzberger-new-york-times-journalisms-essential-value-objectivity-independence.php"><span>an essay</span></a><span> for the </span><i><span>Columbia Journalism Review</span></i><span>. “The traditionalists in the ranks have long believed that their long-standing view speaks for itself. I became increasingly convinced that the argument doesn’t make itself,” he tells David Remnick. Sulzberger shies away from the term objectivity, instead describing the “posture of independence” as one that prizes “an open mind, a skeptical mind,” and a clear-eyed pursuit of truth––even if it leads to uncomfortable conclusions. Sulzberger, whose family has owned the paper since 1896, says he wants to push back on a culture of “certitude” in journalism. “In this hyper-politicized, hyper-polarized moment, is society benefiting from every single player getting deeper and deeper, and louder and louder, about declaring their personal allegiances and loyalties and preferences?” he asks.</span></p>
<p><span>Plus, this week’s issue of </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> features a new poem by Paul Tran, a young writer whose début collection was named one of the best books of 2022. The poem, “The Three Graces,” takes its name from a rock formation near Colorado Springs. “I was curious: what would these three rocks have to say about the nature of love,” Tran tells the producer Jeffrey Masters. Tran’s poetry explores their personal history—their family immigrated to the United States from Vietnam—as well as their trans identity. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The New York Times’s Publisher on the Future of Journalism, and the Poet Paul Tran</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Over the past several years, as more democratic institutions and norms have come under attack, many journalists have raised the question of whether it is ethical to adhere to journalism’s traditional principles of non-bias, objectivity, and political neutrality. In May, A. G. Sulzberger, the publisher of the New York </span><i><span>Times</span></i><span>, staked out his position in the traditionalist camp in </span><a href="https://www.cjr.org/special_report/ag-sulzberger-new-york-times-journalisms-essential-value-objectivity-independence.php"><span>an essay</span></a><span> for the </span><i><span>Columbia Journalism Review</span></i><span>. “The traditionalists in the ranks have long believed that their long-standing view speaks for itself. I became increasingly convinced that the argument doesn’t make itself,” he tells David Remnick. Sulzberger shies away from the term objectivity, instead describing the “posture of independence” as one that prizes “an open mind, a skeptical mind,” and a clear-eyed pursuit of truth––even if it leads to uncomfortable conclusions. Sulzberger, whose family has owned the paper since 1896, says he wants to push back on a culture of “certitude” in journalism. “In this hyper-politicized, hyper-polarized moment, is society benefiting from every single player getting deeper and deeper, and louder and louder, about declaring their personal allegiances and loyalties and preferences?” he asks.</span></p>
<p><span>Plus, this week’s issue of </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> features a new poem by Paul Tran, a young writer whose début collection was named one of the best books of 2022. The poem, “The Three Graces,” takes its name from a rock formation near Colorado Springs. “I was curious: what would these three rocks have to say about the nature of love,” Tran tells the producer Jeffrey Masters. Tran’s poetry explores their personal history—their family immigrated to the United States from Vietnam—as well as their trans identity. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Over the past several years, as more democratic institutions and norms have come under attack, many journalists have raised the question of whether it is ethical to adhere to journalism’s traditional principles of non-bias, objectivity, and political neutrality. In May, A. G. Sulzberger, the publisher of the New York Times, staked out his position in the traditionalist camp in an essay for the Columbia Journalism Review. “The traditionalists in the ranks have long believed that their long-standing view speaks for itself. I became increasingly convinced that the argument doesn’t make itself,” he tells David Remnick. Sulzberger shies away from the term objectivity, instead describing the “posture of independence” as one that prizes “an open mind, a skeptical mind,” and a clear-eyed pursuit of truth––even if it leads to uncomfortable conclusions. Sulzberger, whose family has owned the paper since 1896, says he wants to push back on a culture of “certitude” in journalism. “In this hyper-politicized, hyper-polarized moment, is society benefiting from every single player getting deeper and deeper, and louder and louder, about declaring their personal allegiances and loyalties and preferences?” he asks. Plus, this week’s issue of The New Yorker features a new poem by Paul Tran, a young writer whose début collection was named one of the best books of 2022. The poem, “The Three Graces,” takes its name from a rock formation near Colorado Springs. “I was curious: what would these three rocks have to say about the nature of love,” Tran tells the producer Jeffrey Masters. Tran’s poetry explores their personal history—their family immigrated to the United States from Vietnam—as well as their trans identity. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>A Gay Russian, Exiled in Ireland
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/gay-russian-exiled-ireland-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Evgeny Shtorn and Alexander Kondakov were living together in St. Petersburg when Vladimir Putin began his crackdown on the L.G.B.T.Q. movement in Russia, passing laws that prevented gay “propaganda.” Kondakov is a scholar of the movement, and Shtorn has studied the sociology of hate crimes against gay men. The couple also worked for an N.G.O. that received foreign funding, which made them appear particularly suspicious to Russian authorities. After Shtorn’s citizenship was rescinded, he became vulnerable to pressure from the F.S.B., the Russian security agency, which tried to make him an informant. Finally Shtorn decided to flee, seeking refuge as a stateless person in Ireland, where Masha Gessen spoke with him. Gessen says that Putin’s recent targeting of L.G.B.T. people is perfectly in line with his methods. “[We] make the perfect scapegoat, because we stand in for everything,” she says. “We stand in for the West. We stand in all the things that have changed in the last quarter century that make you uncomfortable. And, of course, no Russian thinks they’ve ever met a gay person in person—so that makes it really easy to create that image of ‘the villainous queer people.’ ”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment originally aired June 10, 2019. Since that time, Shtorn received refugee status, and was reunited with Kondakov in Ireland. They married in 2023.   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4b543081-b973-4c6b-bd24-68bd0dc92dab</guid><enclosure length="18032000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour060623_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1331924"/><category>asylum</category><category>hate_crime</category><category>lgbtq</category><category>national_news</category><category>pride_month</category><category>queer_families</category><category>queer_identity</category><category>russia</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour060623_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1331924"/><media:description type="plain">A Gay Russian, Exiled in Ireland
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/06/AP22175473933741_LGBTRussianExiles.png" width="130"/><itunes:duration>18:47</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Evgeny Shtorn and Alexander Kondakov were living together in St. Petersburg when Vladimir Putin began his crackdown on the L.G.B.T.Q. movement in Russia, passing laws that prevented gay “propaganda.” Kondakov is a scholar of the movement, and Shtorn has studied the sociology of hate crimes against gay men. The couple also worked for an N.G.O. that received foreign funding, which made them appear particularly suspicious to Russian authorities. After Shtorn’s citizenship was rescinded, he became vulnerable to pressure from the F.S.B., the Russian security agency, which tried to make him an informant. Finally Shtorn decided to flee, seeking refuge as a stateless person in Ireland, where Masha Gessen spoke with him. Gessen says that Putin’s recent targeting of L.G.B.T. people is perfectly in line with his methods. “[We] make the perfect scapegoat, because we stand in for everything,” she says. “We stand in for the West. We stand in all the things that have changed in the last quarter century that make you uncomfortable. And, of course, no Russian thinks they’ve ever met a gay person in person—so that makes it really easy to create that image of ‘the villainous queer people.’ ”</span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired June 10, 2019. Since that time, Shtorn received refugee status, and was reunited with Kondakov in Ireland. They married in 2023.   </span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>A Gay Russian, Exiled in Ireland</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Evgeny Shtorn and Alexander Kondakov were living together in St. Petersburg when Vladimir Putin began his crackdown on the L.G.B.T.Q. movement in Russia, passing laws that prevented gay “propaganda.” Kondakov is a scholar of the movement, and Shtorn has studied the sociology of hate crimes against gay men. The couple also worked for an N.G.O. that received foreign funding, which made them appear particularly suspicious to Russian authorities. After Shtorn’s citizenship was rescinded, he became vulnerable to pressure from the F.S.B., the Russian security agency, which tried to make him an informant. Finally Shtorn decided to flee, seeking refuge as a stateless person in Ireland, where Masha Gessen spoke with him. Gessen says that Putin’s recent targeting of L.G.B.T. people is perfectly in line with his methods. “[We] make the perfect scapegoat, because we stand in for everything,” she says. “We stand in for the West. We stand in all the things that have changed in the last quarter century that make you uncomfortable. And, of course, no Russian thinks they’ve ever met a gay person in person—so that makes it really easy to create that image of ‘the villainous queer people.’ ”</span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired June 10, 2019. Since that time, Shtorn received refugee status, and was reunited with Kondakov in Ireland. They married in 2023.   </span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Evgeny Shtorn and Alexander Kondakov were living together in St. Petersburg when Vladimir Putin began his crackdown on the L.G.B.T.Q. movement in Russia, passing laws that prevented gay “propaganda.” Kondakov is a scholar of the movement, and Shtorn has studied the sociology of hate crimes against gay men. The couple also worked for an N.G.O. that received foreign funding, which made them appear particularly suspicious to Russian authorities. After Shtorn’s citizenship was rescinded, he became vulnerable to pressure from the F.S.B., the Russian security agency, which tried to make him an informant. Finally Shtorn decided to flee, seeking refuge as a stateless person in Ireland, where Masha Gessen spoke with him. Gessen says that Putin’s recent targeting of L.G.B.T. people is perfectly in line with his methods. “[We] make the perfect scapegoat, because we stand in for everything,” she says. “We stand in for the West. We stand in all the things that have changed in the last quarter century that make you uncomfortable. And, of course, no Russian thinks they’ve ever met a gay person in person—so that makes it really easy to create that image of ‘the villainous queer people.’ ” This segment originally aired June 10, 2019. Since that time, Shtorn received refugee status, and was reunited with Kondakov in Ireland. They married in 2023.   </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Should We, and Can We, Put the Brakes on Artificial Intelligence?
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/should-we-and-can-we-put-brakes-artificial-intelligence-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, which created ChatGPT, says that AI is a powerful tool that will streamline human work and quicken the pace of scientific advancement  But ChatGPT has both enthralled and terrified us, and even some of AI’s pioneers are freaked out by it – by how quickly the technology has advanced.  David Remnick talks with Altman, and with computer scientist Yoshua Bengio, who won the prestigious Turing Award for his work in 2018, but recently signed an open letter calling for a moratorium on some AI research until regulation can be implemented. The stakes, Bengio says, are high. “I believe there is a non-negligible risk that this kind of technology, in the short term, could disrupt democracies.”  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fee77c5d-4f1e-462a-97ba-6d2eb92ec605</guid><enclosure length="31344000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour060223_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1331923"/><category>artificial_intelligence</category><category>chatgpt</category><category>lgbtq</category><category>national_news</category><category>news</category><category>openai</category><category>politics</category><category>russia</category><category>science</category><category>social_justice</category><category>technology</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour060223_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1331923"/><media:description type="plain">Should We, and Can We, Put the Brakes on Artificial Intelligence?
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/06/TNYradiohour060223_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>32:39</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, which created ChatGPT, says that AI is a powerful tool that will streamline human work and quicken the pace of scientific advancement  But ChatGPT has both enthralled and terrified us, and even some of AI’s pioneers are freaked out by it – by how quickly the technology has advanced.  David Remnick talks with Altman, and with computer scientist Yoshua Bengio, who won the prestigious Turing Award for his work in 2018, but recently signed an open letter calling for a moratorium on some AI research until regulation can be implemented. The stakes, Bengio says, are high. “I believe there is a non-negligible risk that this kind of technology, in the short term, could disrupt democracies.”  </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Should We, and Can We, Put the Brakes on Artificial Intelligence?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, which created ChatGPT, says that AI is a powerful tool that will streamline human work and quicken the pace of scientific advancement  But ChatGPT has both enthralled and terrified us, and even some of AI’s pioneers are freaked out by it – by how quickly the technology has advanced.  David Remnick talks with Altman, and with computer scientist Yoshua Bengio, who won the prestigious Turing Award for his work in 2018, but recently signed an open letter calling for a moratorium on some AI research until regulation can be implemented. The stakes, Bengio says, are high. “I believe there is a non-negligible risk that this kind of technology, in the short term, could disrupt democracies.”  </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, which created ChatGPT, says that AI is a powerful tool that will streamline human work and quicken the pace of scientific advancement  But ChatGPT has both enthralled and terrified us, and even some of AI’s pioneers are freaked out by it – by how quickly the technology has advanced.  David Remnick talks with Altman, and with computer scientist Yoshua Bengio, who won the prestigious Turing Award for his work in 2018, but recently signed an open letter calling for a moratorium on some AI research until regulation can be implemented. The stakes, Bengio says, are high. “I believe there is a non-negligible risk that this kind of technology, in the short term, could disrupt democracies.” </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Director Rob Marshall on Halle Bailey as “The Little Mermaid”
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/director-rob-marshall-halle-bailey-little-mermaid/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The live-action remake of Disney’s classic “The Little Mermaid” is out this weekend. The performance of Halle Bailey as Princess Ariel has been widely praised, but some on the right lambasted the casting of a Black actress in the role as an example of—of course—wokeness on the part of Disney. The film’s director, Rob Marshall, dismisses the notion as quickly as he can. “It was never: ‘Let’s do a woke version of ‘Little Mermaid,’ ” he tells &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/naomi-fry"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Naomi Fry&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; “It was: ‘Let’s just do the best version.’ ” Marshall took an unusual path toward directing: he began his career as a dancer on Broadway, moving to film only after becoming injured while performing in “Cats.” Since then, he has directed “Chicago,” “Memoirs of a Geisha,” and “Mary Poppins Returns.” For “The Little Mermaid,” he drew inspiration from the original Hans Christian Andersen text, which he says is a coming-of-age story about a young girl who breaks down barriers to understand herself and the world around her. “I just felt, wow, isn’t that the world we live in?,” he says. “I mean for me, the whole time I was doing this movie, it felt really like an antidote to the times we’re living in, the divisive world we live in.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">859b17a3-6fb1-4d3c-83e9-d74aaa6b9f24</guid><enclosure length="15520000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour053023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1329788"/><category>arts</category><category>disney</category><category>halle_bailey</category><category>movie</category><category>musical</category><category>news</category><category>racism</category><category>rob_marshall</category><category>the_little_mermaid</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour053023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1329788"/><media:description type="plain">The Director Rob Marshall on Halle Bailey as “The Little Mermaid”
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/05/AP23129094448298_RobMarshall.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>16:10</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The live-action remake of Disney’s classic “The Little Mermaid” is out this weekend. The performance of Halle Bailey as Princess Ariel has been widely praised, but some on the right lambasted the casting of a Black actress in the role as an example of—of course—wokeness on the part of Disney. The film’s director, Rob Marshall, dismisses the notion as quickly as he can. “It was never: ‘Let’s do a woke version of ‘Little Mermaid,’ ” he tells </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/naomi-fry"><span>Naomi Fry</span></a><i><span>.</span></i><span> “It was: ‘Let’s just do the best version.’ ” Marshall took an unusual path toward directing: he began his career as a dancer on Broadway, moving to film only after becoming injured while performing in “Cats.” Since then, he has directed “Chicago,” “Memoirs of a Geisha,” and “Mary Poppins Returns.” For “The Little Mermaid,” he drew inspiration from the original Hans Christian Andersen text, which he says is a coming-of-age story about a young girl who breaks down barriers to understand herself and the world around her. “I just felt, wow, isn’t that the world we live in?,” he says. “I mean for me, the whole time I was doing this movie, it felt really like an antidote to the times we’re living in, the divisive world we live in.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Director Rob Marshall on Halle Bailey as “The Little Mermaid”</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The live-action remake of Disney’s classic “The Little Mermaid” is out this weekend. The performance of Halle Bailey as Princess Ariel has been widely praised, but some on the right lambasted the casting of a Black actress in the role as an example of—of course—wokeness on the part of Disney. The film’s director, Rob Marshall, dismisses the notion as quickly as he can. “It was never: ‘Let’s do a woke version of ‘Little Mermaid,’ ” he tells </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/naomi-fry"><span>Naomi Fry</span></a><i><span>.</span></i><span> “It was: ‘Let’s just do the best version.’ ” Marshall took an unusual path toward directing: he began his career as a dancer on Broadway, moving to film only after becoming injured while performing in “Cats.” Since then, he has directed “Chicago,” “Memoirs of a Geisha,” and “Mary Poppins Returns.” For “The Little Mermaid,” he drew inspiration from the original Hans Christian Andersen text, which he says is a coming-of-age story about a young girl who breaks down barriers to understand herself and the world around her. “I just felt, wow, isn’t that the world we live in?,” he says. “I mean for me, the whole time I was doing this movie, it felt really like an antidote to the times we’re living in, the divisive world we live in.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The live-action remake of Disney’s classic “The Little Mermaid” is out this weekend. The performance of Halle Bailey as Princess Ariel has been widely praised, but some on the right lambasted the casting of a Black actress in the role as an example of—of course—wokeness on the part of Disney. The film’s director, Rob Marshall, dismisses the notion as quickly as he can. “It was never: ‘Let’s do a woke version of ‘Little Mermaid,’ ” he tells Naomi Fry. “It was: ‘Let’s just do the best version.’ ” Marshall took an unusual path toward directing: he began his career as a dancer on Broadway, moving to film only after becoming injured while performing in “Cats.” Since then, he has directed “Chicago,” “Memoirs of a Geisha,” and “Mary Poppins Returns.” For “The Little Mermaid,” he drew inspiration from the original Hans Christian Andersen text, which he says is a coming-of-age story about a young girl who breaks down barriers to understand herself and the world around her. “I just felt, wow, isn’t that the world we live in?,” he says. “I mean for me, the whole time I was doing this movie, it felt really like an antidote to the times we’re living in, the divisive world we live in.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>E. Jean Carroll and Roberta Kaplan on Defamatory Trump, and Dexter Filkins on Ron DeSantis
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/e-jean-carroll-and-roberta-kaplan-defamatory-trump-and-dexter-filkins-ron-desantis/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Earlier this month, E Jean Carroll won an unprecedented legal victory: in a civil suit, Donald Trump was found liable for sexual abuse against her in the mid-nineteen-nineties, and for defamation in later accusing her of a hoax. But no sooner was that decision announced than Trump reiterated his defamatory insults against her in a controversial CNN interview. Carroll has now filed an amended complaint, in a separate suit, based on Trump’s continued barrage. But can anything make him stop? “The one thing he understands is money,” Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, tells David Remnick. “At some point he’ll understand that every time he does it, it’s going to cost him  a few million dollars. And that may make a difference.” Carroll acknowledges that Trump will keep attacking her to get a laugh—“a lot of people don’t like women,” she says simply—but she is undaunted, telling Remnick, “I hate to be all positive about this, but I think we’ve made a difference, I really do.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, the staff writer Dexter Filkins on Ron DeSantis, who finally announced his Presidential candidacy this week. In 2022, Filkins profiled the Florida governor as his national ambitions were becoming clear. “He’s very good at staking out a position and pounding the table,” Filkins notes, “saying, ‘I’m not giving in to the liberals in the Northeast.’ ”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 13:20:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d9c95915-55fa-4df8-9f7a-03e058fc5b1a</guid><enclosure length="32560000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour052623_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1329786"/><category>defamation</category><category>e_jean_carroll</category><category>florida</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>national_news</category><category>news</category><category>politics</category><category>president</category><category>ron_desantis</category><category>trump</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour052623_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1329786"/><media:description type="plain">E. Jean Carroll and Roberta Kaplan on Defamatory Trump, and Dexter Filkins on Ron DeSantis
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/05/TNYradiohour_052623_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>33:55</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Earlier this month, E Jean Carroll won an unprecedented legal victory: in a civil suit, Donald Trump was found liable for sexual abuse against her in the mid-nineteen-nineties, and for defamation in later accusing her of a hoax. But no sooner was that decision announced than Trump reiterated his defamatory insults against her in a controversial CNN interview. Carroll has now filed an amended complaint, in a separate suit, based on Trump’s continued barrage. But can anything make him stop? “The one thing he understands is money,” Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, tells David Remnick. “At some point he’ll understand that every time he does it, it’s going to cost him  a few million dollars. And that may make a difference.” Carroll acknowledges that Trump will keep attacking her to get a laugh—“a lot of people don’t like women,” she says simply—but she is undaunted, telling Remnick, “I hate to be all positive about this, but I think we’ve made a difference, I really do.” </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, the staff writer Dexter Filkins on Ron DeSantis, who finally announced his Presidential candidacy this week. In 2022, Filkins profiled the Florida governor as his national ambitions were becoming clear. “He’s very good at staking out a position and pounding the table,” Filkins notes, “saying, ‘I’m not giving in to the liberals in the Northeast.’ ”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>E. Jean Carroll and Roberta Kaplan on Defamatory Trump, and Dexter Filkins on Ron DeSantis</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Earlier this month, E Jean Carroll won an unprecedented legal victory: in a civil suit, Donald Trump was found liable for sexual abuse against her in the mid-nineteen-nineties, and for defamation in later accusing her of a hoax. But no sooner was that decision announced than Trump reiterated his defamatory insults against her in a controversial CNN interview. Carroll has now filed an amended complaint, in a separate suit, based on Trump’s continued barrage. But can anything make him stop? “The one thing he understands is money,” Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, tells David Remnick. “At some point he’ll understand that every time he does it, it’s going to cost him  a few million dollars. And that may make a difference.” Carroll acknowledges that Trump will keep attacking her to get a laugh—“a lot of people don’t like women,” she says simply—but she is undaunted, telling Remnick, “I hate to be all positive about this, but I think we’ve made a difference, I really do.” </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, the staff writer Dexter Filkins on Ron DeSantis, who finally announced his Presidential candidacy this week. In 2022, Filkins profiled the Florida governor as his national ambitions were becoming clear. “He’s very good at staking out a position and pounding the table,” Filkins notes, “saying, ‘I’m not giving in to the liberals in the Northeast.’ ”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Earlier this month, E Jean Carroll won an unprecedented legal victory: in a civil suit, Donald Trump was found liable for sexual abuse against her in the mid-nineteen-nineties, and for defamation in later accusing her of a hoax. But no sooner was that decision announced than Trump reiterated his defamatory insults against her in a controversial CNN interview. Carroll has now filed an amended complaint, in a separate suit, based on Trump’s continued barrage. But can anything make him stop? “The one thing he understands is money,” Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, tells David Remnick. “At some point he’ll understand that every time he does it, it’s going to cost him  a few million dollars. And that may make a difference.” Carroll acknowledges that Trump will keep attacking her to get a laugh—“a lot of people don’t like women,” she says simply—but she is undaunted, telling Remnick, “I hate to be all positive about this, but I think we’ve made a difference, I really do.”  Plus, the staff writer Dexter Filkins on Ron DeSantis, who finally announced his Presidential candidacy this week. In 2022, Filkins profiled the Florida governor as his national ambitions were becoming clear. “He’s very good at staking out a position and pounding the table,” Filkins notes, “saying, ‘I’m not giving in to the liberals in the Northeast.’ ”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Jill Lepore on the Joy of Gardening
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/jill-lepore-joy-gardening-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;It’s the time of year when many people feel an overpowering urge to dig—to plant their back yard or vegetable garden, or even the flowerpots on the fire escape. “I just love the whole process. I love the muck of it,” Jill Lepore tells David Remnick. “You’re kind of entrapped in a completely different rhythm, and it’s all so entirely out of your control. … It’s a never-ending process of education.” Lepore, a professor of history as well as a staff writer, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/03/20/what-we-learn-from-leafing-through-seed-catalogues"&gt;&lt;span&gt;wrote recently&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; on her passion for seed catalogues, and shares a couple of things she’s excited about growing this year.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">52e350d3-4285-4bfe-9dd1-54d7e4d646f0</guid><enclosure length="10128000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour052323_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1328020"/><category>birding</category><category>environment</category><category>food</category><category>gardening</category><category>growing</category><category>history</category><category>life</category><category>spring</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour052323_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1328020"/><media:description type="plain">Jill Lepore on the Joy of Gardening
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/05/AP22119574344907.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>10:33</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>It’s the time of year when many people feel an overpowering urge to dig—to plant their back yard or vegetable garden, or even the flowerpots on the fire escape. “I just love the whole process. I love the muck of it,” Jill Lepore tells David Remnick. “You’re kind of entrapped in a completely different rhythm, and it’s all so entirely out of your control. … It’s a never-ending process of education.” Lepore, a professor of history as well as a staff writer, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/03/20/what-we-learn-from-leafing-through-seed-catalogues"><span>wrote recently</span></a><span> on her passion for seed catalogues, and shares a couple of things she’s excited about growing this year.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Jill Lepore on the Joy of Gardening</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>It’s the time of year when many people feel an overpowering urge to dig—to plant their back yard or vegetable garden, or even the flowerpots on the fire escape. “I just love the whole process. I love the muck of it,” Jill Lepore tells David Remnick. “You’re kind of entrapped in a completely different rhythm, and it’s all so entirely out of your control. … It’s a never-ending process of education.” Lepore, a professor of history as well as a staff writer, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/03/20/what-we-learn-from-leafing-through-seed-catalogues"><span>wrote recently</span></a><span> on her passion for seed catalogues, and shares a couple of things she’s excited about growing this year.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>It’s the time of year when many people feel an overpowering urge to dig—to plant their back yard or vegetable garden, or even the flowerpots on the fire escape. “I just love the whole process. I love the muck of it,” Jill Lepore tells David Remnick. “You’re kind of entrapped in a completely different rhythm, and it’s all so entirely out of your control. … It’s a never-ending process of education.” Lepore, a professor of history as well as a staff writer, wrote recently on her passion for seed catalogues, and shares a couple of things she’s excited about growing this year.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Behind the Scenes with Tom Hanks
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/behind-scenes-tom-hanks-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Tom Hanks has been a constant presence on the American movie screen for forty years. He has played a mermaid’s boyfriend, an astronaut, a soldier on D Day, an F.B.I. agent, an AIDS patient, a castaway, and a strange, innocent character running across America—among dozens of other roles. Hanks won the Academy Award for Best Actor two years in a row. Now in his sixties, Hanks has added another line to his résumé: novelist. “The Making of Another Major Motion Picture Masterpiece”—an overstuffed, often funny, work of fiction—captures what he’s learned from forty years in the business. Hanks describes the process of moviemaking as equal parts chaos and monotony. “If anybody who we call a noncombatant, or a civilian, wants to visit the making of a motion picture, they will be bored out of their skull,” he tells David Remnick, insisting that it’s impossible to know on set whether a production will be a masterpiece or a flop. “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;You do not know if it is going to work out. You can only have faith.”  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Hanks spoke with Remnick onstage at Symphony Space as part of The New Yorker Live to kick off his book tour.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">dd197afc-0b33-4b33-b231-4fb657f48c8d</guid><enclosure length="36288000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour051923_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1328019"/><category>actor</category><category>arts</category><category>books</category><category>classic_film</category><category>film</category><category>hollywood</category><category>movies</category><category>tom_hanks</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour051923_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1328019"/><media:description type="plain">Behind the Scenes with Tom Hanks
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/05/TNYradiohour05192023_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>37:48</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Tom Hanks has been a constant presence on the American movie screen for forty years. He has played a mermaid’s boyfriend, an astronaut, a soldier on D Day, an F.B.I. agent, an AIDS patient, a castaway, and a strange, innocent character running across America—among dozens of other roles. Hanks won the Academy Award for Best Actor two years in a row. Now in his sixties, Hanks has added another line to his résumé: novelist. “The Making of Another Major Motion Picture Masterpiece”—an overstuffed, often funny, work of fiction—captures what he’s learned from forty years in the business. Hanks describes the process of moviemaking as equal parts chaos and monotony. “If anybody who we call a noncombatant, or a civilian, wants to visit the making of a motion picture, they will be bored out of their skull,” he tells David Remnick, insisting that it’s impossible to know on set whether a production will be a masterpiece or a flop. “</span><span>You do not know if it is going to work out. You can only have faith.”  </span></p>
<p><span>Hanks spoke with Remnick onstage at Symphony Space as part of The New Yorker Live to kick off his book tour.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Behind the Scenes with Tom Hanks</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Tom Hanks has been a constant presence on the American movie screen for forty years. He has played a mermaid’s boyfriend, an astronaut, a soldier on D Day, an F.B.I. agent, an AIDS patient, a castaway, and a strange, innocent character running across America—among dozens of other roles. Hanks won the Academy Award for Best Actor two years in a row. Now in his sixties, Hanks has added another line to his résumé: novelist. “The Making of Another Major Motion Picture Masterpiece”—an overstuffed, often funny, work of fiction—captures what he’s learned from forty years in the business. Hanks describes the process of moviemaking as equal parts chaos and monotony. “If anybody who we call a noncombatant, or a civilian, wants to visit the making of a motion picture, they will be bored out of their skull,” he tells David Remnick, insisting that it’s impossible to know on set whether a production will be a masterpiece or a flop. “</span><span>You do not know if it is going to work out. You can only have faith.”  </span></p>
<p><span>Hanks spoke with Remnick onstage at Symphony Space as part of The New Yorker Live to kick off his book tour.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Tom Hanks has been a constant presence on the American movie screen for forty years. He has played a mermaid’s boyfriend, an astronaut, a soldier on D Day, an F.B.I. agent, an AIDS patient, a castaway, and a strange, innocent character running across America—among dozens of other roles. Hanks won the Academy Award for Best Actor two years in a row. Now in his sixties, Hanks has added another line to his résumé: novelist. “The Making of Another Major Motion Picture Masterpiece”—an overstuffed, often funny, work of fiction—captures what he’s learned from forty years in the business. Hanks describes the process of moviemaking as equal parts chaos and monotony. “If anybody who we call a noncombatant, or a civilian, wants to visit the making of a motion picture, they will be bored out of their skull,” he tells David Remnick, insisting that it’s impossible to know on set whether a production will be a masterpiece or a flop. “You do not know if it is going to work out. You can only have faith.”   Hanks spoke with Remnick onstage at Symphony Space as part of The New Yorker Live to kick off his book tour.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>How Climate Change Is Impacting Our Mental Health
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/how-climate-change-impacting-our-mental-health/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In June, a first-of-its-kind lawsuit will go to trial in Montana. The case, Held v. Montana, centers on the climate crisis. Sixteen young plaintiffs allege their state government has failed in its obligation, spelled out in the state constitution, to provide residents with a healthful environment. The psychiatrist Dr. Lise Van Susteren is serving as an expert witness and intends to detail the emotional distress that can result from watching the environmental destruction unfolding year after year. “Kids are talking about their anger. They’re talking about their fear. They’re talking about their despair. They’re talking about feelings of abandonment,” she tells David Remnick. “And they don’t understand why the adults in the room are not taking more action.” Dr. Van Susteren is a co-founder of the Climate Psychiatry Alliance, a network of mental-health providers concerned with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;educating colleagues and the public about the climate crisis.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ed7a1045-9fe7-4a79-aeda-4750e6e82286</guid><enclosure length="16288000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour051623_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1326161"/><category>climate_change</category><category>environment</category><category>mental_health</category><category>national_news</category><category>politics</category><category>psychologist</category><category>science</category><category>social_justice</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour051623_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1326161"/><media:description type="plain">How Climate Change Is Impacting Our Mental Health
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/05/AP19263638685549_ClimateAnxiety.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>16:58</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>In June, a first-of-its-kind lawsuit will go to trial in Montana. The case, Held v. Montana, centers on the climate crisis. Sixteen young plaintiffs allege their state government has failed in its obligation, spelled out in the state constitution, to provide residents with a healthful environment. The psychiatrist Dr. Lise Van Susteren is serving as an expert witness and intends to detail the emotional distress that can result from watching the environmental destruction unfolding year after year. “Kids are talking about their anger. They’re talking about their fear. They’re talking about their despair. They’re talking about feelings of abandonment,” she tells David Remnick. “And they don’t understand why the adults in the room are not taking more action.” Dr. Van Susteren is a co-founder of the Climate Psychiatry Alliance, a network of mental-health providers concerned with </span><span>educating colleagues and the public about the climate crisis.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>How Climate Change Is Impacting Our Mental Health</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>In June, a first-of-its-kind lawsuit will go to trial in Montana. The case, Held v. Montana, centers on the climate crisis. Sixteen young plaintiffs allege their state government has failed in its obligation, spelled out in the state constitution, to provide residents with a healthful environment. The psychiatrist Dr. Lise Van Susteren is serving as an expert witness and intends to detail the emotional distress that can result from watching the environmental destruction unfolding year after year. “Kids are talking about their anger. They’re talking about their fear. They’re talking about their despair. They’re talking about feelings of abandonment,” she tells David Remnick. “And they don’t understand why the adults in the room are not taking more action.” Dr. Van Susteren is a co-founder of the Climate Psychiatry Alliance, a network of mental-health providers concerned with </span><span>educating colleagues and the public about the climate crisis.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>In June, a first-of-its-kind lawsuit will go to trial in Montana. The case, Held v. Montana, centers on the climate crisis. Sixteen young plaintiffs allege their state government has failed in its obligation, spelled out in the state constitution, to provide residents with a healthful environment. The psychiatrist Dr. Lise Van Susteren is serving as an expert witness and intends to detail the emotional distress that can result from watching the environmental destruction unfolding year after year. “Kids are talking about their anger. They’re talking about their fear. They’re talking about their despair. They’re talking about feelings of abandonment,” she tells David Remnick. “And they don’t understand why the adults in the room are not taking more action.” Dr. Van Susteren is a co-founder of the Climate Psychiatry Alliance, a network of mental-health providers concerned with educating colleagues and the public about the climate crisis.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Michael Schulman on the Writers’ Strike, and Samantha Irby with Doreen St. Félix
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/michael-schulman-writers-strike-and-samantha-irby-doreen-st-felix/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The last time the Writers Guild of America hit the picket line was fifteen years ago, with a strike that lasted a hundred days and cost the city of Los Angeles hundreds of millions of dollars. This year’s strike has the potential to drag on even longer. At the core of the dispute is the question of who deserves to profit from the revenue generated by streaming services. “[Studios] tell us that they can’t afford the cost of us,” Laura Jacqmin, a veteran TV writer and a W.G.A. strike captain &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/notes-on-hollywood/why-are-tv-writers-so-miserable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;tells the staff writer Michael Schulman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. “And simultaneously they’re on their public earnings calls, trumpeting bright financial futures to their shareholders.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, the comedian and essayist Samantha Irby talks with the staff writer and critic Doreen St. Félix. Irby is beloved by fans for her particularly unvarnished truth-telling. She recently started writing for television on shows like Hulu‘s “Shrill” and HBO’s “And Just Like That . . .,” the “Sex and the City” reboot, which returns for a second season in June. But she has also maintained her memoir-writing practice, and is out with a new essay collection, “Quietly Hostile,” in May.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5a0987d7-ea1e-4fad-b8f6-7ef272df7f08</guid><enclosure length="32480000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour051223_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1326159"/><category>essay</category><category>hbo</category><category>national_news</category><category>protests</category><category>samantha_irby</category><category>social_justice</category><category>strike</category><category>television</category><category>tv</category><category>wga</category><category>writers</category><category>writers_guild_of_america</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour051223_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1326159"/><media:description type="plain">Michael Schulman on the Writers’ Strike, and Samantha Irby with Doreen St. Félix
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/05/TNYradiohour05112023_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>33:50</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The last time the Writers Guild of America hit the picket line was fifteen years ago, with a strike that lasted a hundred days and cost the city of Los Angeles hundreds of millions of dollars. This year’s strike has the potential to drag on even longer. At the core of the dispute is the question of who deserves to profit from the revenue generated by streaming services. “[Studios] tell us that they can’t afford the cost of us,” Laura Jacqmin, a veteran TV writer and a W.G.A. strike captain </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/notes-on-hollywood/why-are-tv-writers-so-miserable"><span>tells the staff writer Michael Schulman</span></a><span>. “And simultaneously they’re on their public earnings calls, trumpeting bright financial futures to their shareholders.” </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, the comedian and essayist Samantha Irby talks with the staff writer and critic Doreen St. Félix. Irby is beloved by fans for her particularly unvarnished truth-telling. She recently started writing for television on shows like Hulu‘s “Shrill” and HBO’s “And Just Like That . . .,” the “Sex and the City” reboot, which returns for a second season in June. But she has also maintained her memoir-writing practice, and is out with a new essay collection, “Quietly Hostile,” in May.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Michael Schulman on the Writers’ Strike, and Samantha Irby with Doreen St. Félix</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The last time the Writers Guild of America hit the picket line was fifteen years ago, with a strike that lasted a hundred days and cost the city of Los Angeles hundreds of millions of dollars. This year’s strike has the potential to drag on even longer. At the core of the dispute is the question of who deserves to profit from the revenue generated by streaming services. “[Studios] tell us that they can’t afford the cost of us,” Laura Jacqmin, a veteran TV writer and a W.G.A. strike captain </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/notes-on-hollywood/why-are-tv-writers-so-miserable"><span>tells the staff writer Michael Schulman</span></a><span>. “And simultaneously they’re on their public earnings calls, trumpeting bright financial futures to their shareholders.” </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, the comedian and essayist Samantha Irby talks with the staff writer and critic Doreen St. Félix. Irby is beloved by fans for her particularly unvarnished truth-telling. She recently started writing for television on shows like Hulu‘s “Shrill” and HBO’s “And Just Like That . . .,” the “Sex and the City” reboot, which returns for a second season in June. But she has also maintained her memoir-writing practice, and is out with a new essay collection, “Quietly Hostile,” in May.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The last time the Writers Guild of America hit the picket line was fifteen years ago, with a strike that lasted a hundred days and cost the city of Los Angeles hundreds of millions of dollars. This year’s strike has the potential to drag on even longer. At the core of the dispute is the question of who deserves to profit from the revenue generated by streaming services. “[Studios] tell us that they can’t afford the cost of us,” Laura Jacqmin, a veteran TV writer and a W.G.A. strike captain tells the staff writer Michael Schulman. “And simultaneously they’re on their public earnings calls, trumpeting bright financial futures to their shareholders.”  Plus, the comedian and essayist Samantha Irby talks with the staff writer and critic Doreen St. Félix. Irby is beloved by fans for her particularly unvarnished truth-telling. She recently started writing for television on shows like Hulu‘s “Shrill” and HBO’s “And Just Like That . . .,” the “Sex and the City” reboot, which returns for a second season in June. But she has also maintained her memoir-writing practice, and is out with a new essay collection, “Quietly Hostile,” in May.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Germany’s Traumatized Kriegskinder Speak Out
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/germanys-traumatized-kriegskinder-speak-out-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;A troubling question looms over the Kriegskinder, Germans who were children during the Second World War: Was my father a mass murderer? These innocent Germans carried the guilt of their nation while their families often remained silent. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/burkhard-bilger"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Burkhard Bilger&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, whose grandfather was a Nazi, speaks with Sabine Bode, a journalist who encourages the now-elderly Kriegskinder to speak about their unacknowledged trauma. Bilger’s new book, “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/Fatherland-Memoir-Conscience-Family-Secrets/dp/0385353987"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Fatherland: A Memoir of War, Conscience, and Family Secrets&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;,” chronicles his years-long quest to understand the truth behind his family history. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment originally aired October 14, 2016.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b83b0d28-0019-4d2f-b552-dc0631d2f5f7</guid><enclosure length="19536000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour050923_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1323925"/><category>germany</category><category>holocaust</category><category>nazi_germany</category><category>politics</category><category>world_news</category><category>world_war_ii</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour050923_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1323925"/><media:description type="plain">Germany’s Traumatized Kriegskinder Speak Out
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/05/AP450427057_Bilger_Bode.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>20:21</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>A troubling question looms over the Kriegskinder, Germans who were children during the Second World War: Was my father a mass murderer? These innocent Germans carried the guilt of their nation while their families often remained silent. </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i> <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/burkhard-bilger"><span>Burkhard Bilger</span></a><span>, whose grandfather was a Nazi, speaks with Sabine Bode, a journalist who encourages the now-elderly Kriegskinder to speak about their unacknowledged trauma. Bilger’s new book, “</span><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Fatherland-Memoir-Conscience-Family-Secrets/dp/0385353987"><span>Fatherland: A Memoir of War, Conscience, and Family Secrets</span></a><span>,” chronicles his years-long quest to understand the truth behind his family history. </span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired October 14, 2016.</span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Germany’s Traumatized Kriegskinder Speak Out</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>A troubling question looms over the Kriegskinder, Germans who were children during the Second World War: Was my father a mass murderer? These innocent Germans carried the guilt of their nation while their families often remained silent. </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i> <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/burkhard-bilger"><span>Burkhard Bilger</span></a><span>, whose grandfather was a Nazi, speaks with Sabine Bode, a journalist who encourages the now-elderly Kriegskinder to speak about their unacknowledged trauma. Bilger’s new book, “</span><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Fatherland-Memoir-Conscience-Family-Secrets/dp/0385353987"><span>Fatherland: A Memoir of War, Conscience, and Family Secrets</span></a><span>,” chronicles his years-long quest to understand the truth behind his family history. </span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired October 14, 2016.</span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>A troubling question looms over the Kriegskinder, Germans who were children during the Second World War: Was my father a mass murderer? These innocent Germans carried the guilt of their nation while their families often remained silent. The New Yorker’s Burkhard Bilger, whose grandfather was a Nazi, speaks with Sabine Bode, a journalist who encourages the now-elderly Kriegskinder to speak about their unacknowledged trauma. Bilger’s new book, “Fatherland: A Memoir of War, Conscience, and Family Secrets,” chronicles his years-long quest to understand the truth behind his family history.  This segment originally aired October 14, 2016.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Have State Legislatures Gone Rogue? And Joshua Yaffa on Evan Gershkovich
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/have-state-legislatures-gone-rogue-and-joshua-yaffa-evan-gershkovich/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Just a month ago, the story of two lawmakers &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/behind-the-expulsions-of-two-state-representatives-in-tennessee"&gt;&lt;span&gt;expelled from the Tennessee legislature&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; captured headlines across the country. Their offense wasn’t corruption or criminal activity— instead, they had joined a protest at the statehouse in favor of gun control, shortly after the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/after-the-nashville-school-shooting-a-faithless-remedy-for-gun-violence"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Nashville shooting&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; at a Christian school. Earlier this week, Representative Zooey Zephyr, of Montana, was barred from the House chamber after making a speech against a trans health-care ban. In the past few years, in Arizona, Wisconsin, and North Carolina, legislatures have worked to strip powers from state officials who happen to be Democrats in order to put those powers in Republican hands.  Jacob Grumbach, a political-science professor and the author of “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/Laboratories-against-Democracy-International-Perspectives/dp/0691218455"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Laboratories Against Democracy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;,” talks about how state politics  has become nationalized. “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;If you’re a politician, and you’re trying to rise in the ranks from the local or state level in your party,” he notes, “your best bet is to join the national culture wars”—&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;even at the expense of constituents’ real concerns.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, the contributing writer Joshua Yaffa talks with David Remnick about Evan Gershkovich, the first American reporter imprisoned in Russia on charges of espionage since the nineteen-eighties. “Evan was not sanguine or Pollyannaish or naïve about the context in which he was working,” Yaffa notes, but he returned to Russia again and again to tell the story of that country’s descent into autocracy.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e045a32c-f19a-44ca-80e3-762e332a6c6b</guid><enclosure length="29904000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour050523_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1323923"/><category>montana</category><category>national_news</category><category>politics</category><category>protests</category><category>russia</category><category>social_justice</category><category>state_legislatures</category><category>tennessee</category><category>vladimir_putin</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour050523_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1323923"/><media:description type="plain">Have State Legislatures Gone Rogue? And Joshua Yaffa on Evan Gershkovich
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/05/TNYradiohour05042023_IMAGE.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>31:09</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Just a month ago, the story of two lawmakers </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/behind-the-expulsions-of-two-state-representatives-in-tennessee"><span>expelled from the Tennessee legislature</span></a><span> captured headlines across the country. Their offense wasn’t corruption or criminal activity— instead, they had joined a protest at the statehouse in favor of gun control, shortly after the </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/after-the-nashville-school-shooting-a-faithless-remedy-for-gun-violence"><span>Nashville shooting</span></a><span> at a Christian school. Earlier this week, Representative Zooey Zephyr, of Montana, was barred from the House chamber after making a speech against a trans health-care ban. In the past few years, in Arizona, Wisconsin, and North Carolina, legislatures have worked to strip powers from state officials who happen to be Democrats in order to put those powers in Republican hands.  Jacob Grumbach, a political-science professor and the author of “</span><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Laboratories-against-Democracy-International-Perspectives/dp/0691218455"><span>Laboratories Against Democracy</span></a><span>,” talks about how state politics  has become nationalized. “</span><span>If you’re a politician, and you’re trying to rise in the ranks from the local or state level in your party,” he notes, “your best bet is to join the national culture wars”—</span><span>even at the expense of constituents’ real concerns.</span></p>
<p><span>Plus, the contributing writer Joshua Yaffa talks with David Remnick about Evan Gershkovich, the first American reporter imprisoned in Russia on charges of espionage since the nineteen-eighties. “Evan was not sanguine or Pollyannaish or naïve about the context in which he was working,” Yaffa notes, but he returned to Russia again and again to tell the story of that country’s descent into autocracy.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Have State Legislatures Gone Rogue? And Joshua Yaffa on Evan Gershkovich</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Just a month ago, the story of two lawmakers </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/behind-the-expulsions-of-two-state-representatives-in-tennessee"><span>expelled from the Tennessee legislature</span></a><span> captured headlines across the country. Their offense wasn’t corruption or criminal activity— instead, they had joined a protest at the statehouse in favor of gun control, shortly after the </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/after-the-nashville-school-shooting-a-faithless-remedy-for-gun-violence"><span>Nashville shooting</span></a><span> at a Christian school. Earlier this week, Representative Zooey Zephyr, of Montana, was barred from the House chamber after making a speech against a trans health-care ban. In the past few years, in Arizona, Wisconsin, and North Carolina, legislatures have worked to strip powers from state officials who happen to be Democrats in order to put those powers in Republican hands.  Jacob Grumbach, a political-science professor and the author of “</span><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Laboratories-against-Democracy-International-Perspectives/dp/0691218455"><span>Laboratories Against Democracy</span></a><span>,” talks about how state politics  has become nationalized. “</span><span>If you’re a politician, and you’re trying to rise in the ranks from the local or state level in your party,” he notes, “your best bet is to join the national culture wars”—</span><span>even at the expense of constituents’ real concerns.</span></p>
<p><span>Plus, the contributing writer Joshua Yaffa talks with David Remnick about Evan Gershkovich, the first American reporter imprisoned in Russia on charges of espionage since the nineteen-eighties. “Evan was not sanguine or Pollyannaish or naïve about the context in which he was working,” Yaffa notes, but he returned to Russia again and again to tell the story of that country’s descent into autocracy.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Just a month ago, the story of two lawmakers expelled from the Tennessee legislature captured headlines across the country. Their offense wasn’t corruption or criminal activity— instead, they had joined a protest at the statehouse in favor of gun control, shortly after the Nashville shooting at a Christian school. Earlier this week, Representative Zooey Zephyr, of Montana, was barred from the House chamber after making a speech against a trans health-care ban. In the past few years, in Arizona, Wisconsin, and North Carolina, legislatures have worked to strip powers from state officials who happen to be Democrats in order to put those powers in Republican hands.  Jacob Grumbach, a political-science professor and the author of “Laboratories Against Democracy,” talks about how state politics  has become nationalized. “If you’re a politician, and you’re trying to rise in the ranks from the local or state level in your party,” he notes, “your best bet is to join the national culture wars”—even at the expense of constituents’ real concerns. Plus, the contributing writer Joshua Yaffa talks with David Remnick about Evan Gershkovich, the first American reporter imprisoned in Russia on charges of espionage since the nineteen-eighties. “Evan was not sanguine or Pollyannaish or naïve about the context in which he was working,” Yaffa notes, but he returned to Russia again and again to tell the story of that country’s descent into autocracy.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>King Charles III Takes the Throne
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/king-charles-iii-takes-throne-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;On May 6th, King Charles will become the oldest person to ascend the throne of the United Kingdom. He is a bit of an odd duck to be the king, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/rebecca-mead"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Rebecca Mead&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; thinks. Charles has “long made clear that he considers his birthright a burden,” she writes. In fact, many things are a burden: during the ceremonies following the death of Queen Elizabeth, the new king “got into not one but two altercations with malfunctioning pens. . . . As his biographer Catherine Mayer puts it, ‘The world is against him—even &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;inanimate&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; objects are against him. That is absolutely central to his personality.’ ” Mead—a subject of the king, as well as a staff writer—talks with David Remnick about Charles III’s coronation, the problem of Harry and Meghan, and the future of the British monarchy itself. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">feddcb86-4d08-4a33-ae22-d46032225428</guid><enclosure length="9936000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour050223_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1322217"/><category>britain</category><category>charles_iii</category><category>coronation</category><category>monarchy</category><category>royal_family</category><category>the_crown</category><category>united_kingdom</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour050223_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1322217"/><media:description type="plain">King Charles III Takes the Throne
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/04/PrinceCharles_AP23110253259513.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>10:21</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>On May 6th, King Charles will become the oldest person to ascend the throne of the United Kingdom. He is a bit of an odd duck to be the king, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/rebecca-mead"><span>Rebecca Mead</span></a><span> thinks. Charles has “long made clear that he considers his birthright a burden,” she writes. In fact, many things are a burden: during the ceremonies following the death of Queen Elizabeth, the new king “got into not one but two altercations with malfunctioning pens. . . . As his biographer Catherine Mayer puts it, ‘The world is against him—even </span><i><span>inanimate</span></i><span> objects are against him. That is absolutely central to his personality.’ ” Mead—a subject of the king, as well as a staff writer—talks with David Remnick about Charles III’s coronation, the problem of Harry and Meghan, and the future of the British monarchy itself. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>King Charles III Takes the Throne</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>On May 6th, King Charles will become the oldest person to ascend the throne of the United Kingdom. He is a bit of an odd duck to be the king, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/rebecca-mead"><span>Rebecca Mead</span></a><span> thinks. Charles has “long made clear that he considers his birthright a burden,” she writes. In fact, many things are a burden: during the ceremonies following the death of Queen Elizabeth, the new king “got into not one but two altercations with malfunctioning pens. . . . As his biographer Catherine Mayer puts it, ‘The world is against him—even </span><i><span>inanimate</span></i><span> objects are against him. That is absolutely central to his personality.’ ” Mead—a subject of the king, as well as a staff writer—talks with David Remnick about Charles III’s coronation, the problem of Harry and Meghan, and the future of the British monarchy itself. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>On May 6th, King Charles will become the oldest person to ascend the throne of the United Kingdom. He is a bit of an odd duck to be the king, Rebecca Mead thinks. Charles has “long made clear that he considers his birthright a burden,” she writes. In fact, many things are a burden: during the ceremonies following the death of Queen Elizabeth, the new king “got into not one but two altercations with malfunctioning pens. . . . As his biographer Catherine Mayer puts it, ‘The world is against him—even inanimate objects are against him. That is absolutely central to his personality.’ ” Mead—a subject of the king, as well as a staff writer—talks with David Remnick about Charles III’s coronation, the problem of Harry and Meghan, and the future of the British monarchy itself.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Harry Belafonte, the Pioneering Artist-Activist
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/harry-belafonte-pioneering-artist-activist-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;We take it for granted that entertainers can—and probably should—advocate for the causes they believe in, political and otherwise. That wasn’t always the case: at one time, entertainers were supposed to entertain, and little else. Harry Belafonte, who died on April 25th at the age of ninety-six, pioneered the artist-activist approach. One of the most celebrated singers of his era, he &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;had a string of huge hits—“The Banana Boat Song,” “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Mama Look a Boo Boo&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;,” “Jamaica Farewell”—while appearing as the rare Black leading man in the movies. A&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;t the same time, Belafonte used his platform to influence public opinion. He was a key figure in the civil-rights movement, a confidant of Martin Luther King’s; a generation later, he worked with Nelson Mandela to help bring down apartheid in South Africa. Belafonte joined The New Yorker Radio Hour in 2016, when the staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jelani-cobb"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jelani Cobb&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; visited him at his office in Manhattan.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment originally aired September 30, 2016. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">12bfab2c-4b16-4690-b52d-2943ac0223ba</guid><enclosure length="12928000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour043023_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1322224"/><category>dead</category><category>harry_belafonte</category><category>music</category><category>national_news</category><category>race</category><category>singer</category><category>social_justice</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour043023_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1322224"/><media:description type="plain">Harry Belafonte, the Pioneering Artist-Activist
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/1/AP_16236829696873.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>13:28</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>We take it for granted that entertainers can—and probably should—advocate for the causes they believe in, political and otherwise. That wasn’t always the case: at one time, entertainers were supposed to entertain, and little else. Harry Belafonte, who died on April 25th at the age of ninety-six, pioneered the artist-activist approach. One of the most celebrated singers of his era, he </span><span>had a string of huge hits—“The Banana Boat Song,” “</span><span>Mama Look a Boo Boo</span><span>,” “Jamaica Farewell”—while appearing as the rare Black leading man in the movies. A</span><span>t the same time, Belafonte used his platform to influence public opinion. He was a key figure in the civil-rights movement, a confidant of Martin Luther King’s; a generation later, he worked with Nelson Mandela to help bring down apartheid in South Africa. Belafonte joined The New Yorker Radio Hour in 2016, when the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jelani-cobb"><span>Jelani Cobb</span></a><span> visited him at his office in Manhattan.</span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired September 30, 2016. </span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Harry Belafonte, the Pioneering Artist-Activist</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>We take it for granted that entertainers can—and probably should—advocate for the causes they believe in, political and otherwise. That wasn’t always the case: at one time, entertainers were supposed to entertain, and little else. Harry Belafonte, who died on April 25th at the age of ninety-six, pioneered the artist-activist approach. One of the most celebrated singers of his era, he </span><span>had a string of huge hits—“The Banana Boat Song,” “</span><span>Mama Look a Boo Boo</span><span>,” “Jamaica Farewell”—while appearing as the rare Black leading man in the movies. A</span><span>t the same time, Belafonte used his platform to influence public opinion. He was a key figure in the civil-rights movement, a confidant of Martin Luther King’s; a generation later, he worked with Nelson Mandela to help bring down apartheid in South Africa. Belafonte joined The New Yorker Radio Hour in 2016, when the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jelani-cobb"><span>Jelani Cobb</span></a><span> visited him at his office in Manhattan.</span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired September 30, 2016. </span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>We take it for granted that entertainers can—and probably should—advocate for the causes they believe in, political and otherwise. That wasn’t always the case: at one time, entertainers were supposed to entertain, and little else. Harry Belafonte, who died on April 25th at the age of ninety-six, pioneered the artist-activist approach. One of the most celebrated singers of his era, he had a string of huge hits—“The Banana Boat Song,” “Mama Look a Boo Boo,” “Jamaica Farewell”—while appearing as the rare Black leading man in the movies. At the same time, Belafonte used his platform to influence public opinion. He was a key figure in the civil-rights movement, a confidant of Martin Luther King’s; a generation later, he worked with Nelson Mandela to help bring down apartheid in South Africa. Belafonte joined The New Yorker Radio Hour in 2016, when the staff writer Jelani Cobb visited him at his office in Manhattan. This segment originally aired September 30, 2016. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Fall of Tucker Carlson, and the Making of Candace Owens
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/fall-tucker-carlson-and-making-candace-owens-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Once a Beltway neoconservative, Tucker Carlson came to embody the angry, forgotten white man—railing at “the élites” and propagating racist conspiracy theories and the lie of the stolen election. “Unlike a lot of his colleagues at Fox News, he made news, he set the agenda,” Kelefa Sanneh, who &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/10/tucker-carlsons-fighting-words"&gt;&lt;span&gt;wrote about Carlson in 2017&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, says. “People were wondering, What is Tucker going to be saying tonight?” Sanneh joins &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/andrew-marantz"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Andrew Marantz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; and David Remnick to discuss Carlson’s demise, and what comes next. And Clare Malone &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-communications/the-gospel-of-candace-owens"&gt;&lt;span&gt;reports on Candace Owens&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, the powerful right-wing influencer and provocateur who’s set her sights on the future of right-wing media—and on a younger and more female audience than that of Fox News.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">18de06fc-4aac-4bf7-a6e9-f20e18803b32</guid><enclosure length="37888000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour042823_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1322216"/><category>candace_owens</category><category>conservative_media</category><category>fox_news</category><category>influencer</category><category>media</category><category>national_news</category><category>news</category><category>tucker_carlson</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour042823_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1322216"/><media:description type="plain">The Fall of Tucker Carlson, and the Making of Candace Owens
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/04/TNYradiohour042823_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>39:28</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Once a Beltway neoconservative, Tucker Carlson came to embody the angry, forgotten white man—railing at “the élites” and propagating racist conspiracy theories and the lie of the stolen election. “Unlike a lot of his colleagues at Fox News, he made news, he set the agenda,” Kelefa Sanneh, who </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/10/tucker-carlsons-fighting-words"><span>wrote about Carlson in 2017</span></a><span>, says. “People were wondering, What is Tucker going to be saying tonight?” Sanneh joins </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/andrew-marantz"><span>Andrew Marantz</span></a><span> and David Remnick to discuss Carlson’s demise, and what comes next. And Clare Malone </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-communications/the-gospel-of-candace-owens"><span>reports on Candace Owens</span></a><span>, the powerful right-wing influencer and provocateur who’s set her sights on the future of right-wing media—and on a younger and more female audience than that of Fox News.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Fall of Tucker Carlson, and the Making of Candace Owens</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Once a Beltway neoconservative, Tucker Carlson came to embody the angry, forgotten white man—railing at “the élites” and propagating racist conspiracy theories and the lie of the stolen election. “Unlike a lot of his colleagues at Fox News, he made news, he set the agenda,” Kelefa Sanneh, who </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/10/tucker-carlsons-fighting-words"><span>wrote about Carlson in 2017</span></a><span>, says. “People were wondering, What is Tucker going to be saying tonight?” Sanneh joins </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/andrew-marantz"><span>Andrew Marantz</span></a><span> and David Remnick to discuss Carlson’s demise, and what comes next. And Clare Malone </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-communications/the-gospel-of-candace-owens"><span>reports on Candace Owens</span></a><span>, the powerful right-wing influencer and provocateur who’s set her sights on the future of right-wing media—and on a younger and more female audience than that of Fox News.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Once a Beltway neoconservative, Tucker Carlson came to embody the angry, forgotten white man—railing at “the élites” and propagating racist conspiracy theories and the lie of the stolen election. “Unlike a lot of his colleagues at Fox News, he made news, he set the agenda,” Kelefa Sanneh, who wrote about Carlson in 2017, says. “People were wondering, What is Tucker going to be saying tonight?” Sanneh joins Andrew Marantz and David Remnick to discuss Carlson’s demise, and what comes next. And Clare Malone reports on Candace Owens, the powerful right-wing influencer and provocateur who’s set her sights on the future of right-wing media—and on a younger and more female audience than that of Fox News.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Bipartisan Effort to Rein in Presidential Military Power
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/bipartisan-effort-rein-presidential-military-power/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Just three days after 9/11, Congress authorized a major expansion of executive power: the President could now wage war against terrorism without prior approval. The resolution was called the Authorization for Use of Military Force, and it passed almost unanimously. Its reauthorization, in 2002, brought our country to war with Iraq, and has been used to deploy American forces all over the world. More than twenty years later, the mood in the country has changed dramatically, and lawmakers in both parties are pushing to roll back the President’s discretion to use force. A bill to revoke the A.U.M.F. passed the Senate 66&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;–&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;30 a few weeks ago, and it is expected to pass the House as well. David Remnick talks with the senators who led that effort—Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat, and Todd Young, a Republican from Indiana—and with Representative Barbara Lee of California, who, in 2001, cast the sole dissenting vote in all of Congress.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, David Remnick remembers the beloved cartoonist Ed Koren, a fixture of the magazine for more than half a century. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4223e470-f007-4863-9b63-772a51d9a61d</guid><enclosure length="22288000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour042523_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1319863"/><category>cartoonist</category><category>military</category><category>national_news</category><category>new_yorker_cartoon</category><category>politics</category><category>senate</category><category>social_justice</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour042523_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1319863"/><media:description type="plain">The Bipartisan Effort to Rein in Presidential Military Power
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/04/AUMF_AP110319142276_3RMXHTG.png" width="130"/><itunes:duration>23:13</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Just three days after 9/11, Congress authorized a major expansion of executive power: the President could now wage war against terrorism without prior approval. The resolution was called the Authorization for Use of Military Force, and it passed almost unanimously. Its reauthorization, in 2002, brought our country to war with Iraq, and has been used to deploy American forces all over the world. More than twenty years later, the mood in the country has changed dramatically, and lawmakers in both parties are pushing to roll back the President’s discretion to use force. A bill to revoke the A.U.M.F. passed the Senate 66</span><span>–</span><span>30 a few weeks ago, and it is expected to pass the House as well. David Remnick talks with the senators who led that effort—Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat, and Todd Young, a Republican from Indiana—and with Representative Barbara Lee of California, who, in 2001, cast the sole dissenting vote in all of Congress.  </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, David Remnick remembers the beloved cartoonist Ed Koren, a fixture of the magazine for more than half a century. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Bipartisan Effort to Rein in Presidential Military Power</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Just three days after 9/11, Congress authorized a major expansion of executive power: the President could now wage war against terrorism without prior approval. The resolution was called the Authorization for Use of Military Force, and it passed almost unanimously. Its reauthorization, in 2002, brought our country to war with Iraq, and has been used to deploy American forces all over the world. More than twenty years later, the mood in the country has changed dramatically, and lawmakers in both parties are pushing to roll back the President’s discretion to use force. A bill to revoke the A.U.M.F. passed the Senate 66</span><span>–</span><span>30 a few weeks ago, and it is expected to pass the House as well. David Remnick talks with the senators who led that effort—Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat, and Todd Young, a Republican from Indiana—and with Representative Barbara Lee of California, who, in 2001, cast the sole dissenting vote in all of Congress.  </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, David Remnick remembers the beloved cartoonist Ed Koren, a fixture of the magazine for more than half a century. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Just three days after 9/11, Congress authorized a major expansion of executive power: the President could now wage war against terrorism without prior approval. The resolution was called the Authorization for Use of Military Force, and it passed almost unanimously. Its reauthorization, in 2002, brought our country to war with Iraq, and has been used to deploy American forces all over the world. More than twenty years later, the mood in the country has changed dramatically, and lawmakers in both parties are pushing to roll back the President’s discretion to use force. A bill to revoke the A.U.M.F. passed the Senate 66–30 a few weeks ago, and it is expected to pass the House as well. David Remnick talks with the senators who led that effort—Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat, and Todd Young, a Republican from Indiana—and with Representative Barbara Lee of California, who, in 2001, cast the sole dissenting vote in all of Congress.   Plus, David Remnick remembers the beloved cartoonist Ed Koren, a fixture of the magazine for more than half a century.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Jane Mayer on Justice Clarence Thomas, and the Music Critic Hanif Abdurraqib on Concert Merch
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/jane-mayer-justice-clarence-thomas-and-music-critic-hanif-abdurraqib-concert-merch/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The cascade of revelations published by ProPublica concerning Justice Clarence Thomas—the island-hopping yachting adventures underwritten by a right-wing billionaire patron, the undisclosed real estate transactions&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;—&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;raises questions about his proximity to power and money. “I think it stretches common sense,” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jane-mayer"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jane Mayer&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; tells David Remnick, “to think that a judge could be independent when he takes that much money from one person.” Mayer notes that other Justices, including the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, have accepted large gifts from politically connected donors. A deepening public distrust in the integrity of the Supreme Court, Mayer thinks, is dangerous for democracy. “The glue that holds us together is the rule of law in this country,” she says. “People have to believe when they go in front of a court, and in particular the Supreme Court, . . . that it’s justice that’s going to prevail.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">caaef2ca-ad2a-4446-a494-a4bf7af05573</guid><enclosure length="26784000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour042123_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1319862"/><category>bands</category><category>clarence_thomas</category><category>jane_mayer</category><category>merch</category><category>music</category><category>national_news</category><category>politics</category><category>social_justice</category><category>supreme_court</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour042123_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1319862"/><media:description type="plain">Jane Mayer on Justice Clarence Thomas, and the Music Critic Hanif Abdurraqib on Concert Merch
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2023/04/TNYradiohour04212023_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>27:54</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The cascade of revelations published by ProPublica concerning Justice Clarence Thomas—the island-hopping yachting adventures underwritten by a right-wing billionaire patron, the undisclosed real estate transactions</span><i><span>—</span></i><span>raises questions about his proximity to power and money. “I think it stretches common sense,” </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jane-mayer"><span>Jane Mayer</span></a><span> tells David Remnick, “to think that a judge could be independent when he takes that much money from one person.” Mayer notes that other Justices, including the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, have accepted large gifts from politically connected donors. A deepening public distrust in the integrity of the Supreme Court, Mayer thinks, is dangerous for democracy. “The glue that holds us together is the rule of law in this country,” she says. “People have to believe when they go in front of a court, and in particular the Supreme Court, . . . that it’s justice that’s going to prevail.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Jane Mayer on Justice Clarence Thomas, and the Music Critic Hanif Abdurraqib on Concert Merch</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The cascade of revelations published by ProPublica concerning Justice Clarence Thomas—the island-hopping yachting adventures underwritten by a right-wing billionaire patron, the undisclosed real estate transactions</span><i><span>—</span></i><span>raises questions about his proximity to power and money. “I think it stretches common sense,” </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jane-mayer"><span>Jane Mayer</span></a><span> tells David Remnick, “to think that a judge could be independent when he takes that much money from one person.” Mayer notes that other Justices, including the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, have accepted large gifts from politically connected donors. A deepening public distrust in the integrity of the Supreme Court, Mayer thinks, is dangerous for democracy. “The glue that holds us together is the rule of law in this country,” she says. “People have to believe when they go in front of a court, and in particular the Supreme Court, . . . that it’s justice that’s going to prevail.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The cascade of revelations published by ProPublica concerning Justice Clarence Thomas—the island-hopping yachting adventures underwritten by a right-wing billionaire patron, the undisclosed real estate transactions—raises questions about his proximity to power and money. “I think it stretches common sense,” Jane Mayer tells David Remnick, “to think that a judge could be independent when he takes that much money from one person.” Mayer notes that other Justices, including the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, have accepted large gifts from politically connected donors. A deepening public distrust in the integrity of the Supreme Court, Mayer thinks, is dangerous for democracy. “The glue that holds us together is the rule of law in this country,” she says. “People have to believe when they go in front of a court, and in particular the Supreme Court, . . . that it’s justice that’s going to prevail.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Playwright Larissa FastHorse on “The Thanksgiving Play,” Broadway’s New Comedy of White Wokeness
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/playwright-larissa-fasthorse-thanksgiving-play-broadways-new-comedy-white-wokeness/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;“The Thanksgiving Play” is a play about the making of a play. Four performers struggle to devise a Thanksgiving performance that’s respectful of Native peoples, historically accurate (while not too grim for white audiences), and also inclusive to the actors themselves. A train wreck ensues. “First it’s fun. . . . You get to have a good time in the theatre. I would say that’s the sugar, and then there’s the medicine,” the playwright Larissa FastHorse tells the staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/vinson-cunningham"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Vinson Cunningham&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. “The satire is the medicine, and you have to keep taking it.” FastHorse was born into the Sicangu Lakota Nation, and was adopted as a child into a white family. She is the first Native American woman to have a play produced on Broadway. “When I was younger, it was very painful to be separated from a lot of things that I felt like I couldn’t partake in because I wasn’t raised on the reservation or had been away from my Lakota family so long,” she says. “But now I really recognize it as my superpower that I can take Lakota culture . . . and contemporary Indigenous experiences and translate them for white audiences, which unfortunately are still the majority of audiences in American theatre.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21256847-3f9d-4979-a5d5-d93d4649caa7</guid><enclosure length="16448000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour041823_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1317253"/><category>arts</category><category>indigenous_culture</category><category>lakota</category><category>native_american</category><category>play</category><category>storytelling</category><category>thanksgiving</category><category>theater</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour041823_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1317253"/><media:description type="plain">The Playwright Larissa FastHorse on “The Thanksgiving Play,” Broadway’s New Comedy of White Wokeness
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/04/Larrisa-fasthorse2.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>17:08</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>“The Thanksgiving Play” is a play about the making of a play. Four performers struggle to devise a Thanksgiving performance that’s respectful of Native peoples, historically accurate (while not too grim for white audiences), and also inclusive to the actors themselves. A train wreck ensues. “First it’s fun. . . . You get to have a good time in the theatre. I would say that’s the sugar, and then there’s the medicine,” the playwright Larissa FastHorse tells the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/vinson-cunningham"><span>Vinson Cunningham</span></a><span>. “The satire is the medicine, and you have to keep taking it.” FastHorse was born into the Sicangu Lakota Nation, and was adopted as a child into a white family. She is the first Native American woman to have a play produced on Broadway. “When I was younger, it was very painful to be separated from a lot of things that I felt like I couldn’t partake in because I wasn’t raised on the reservation or had been away from my Lakota family so long,” she says. “But now I really recognize it as my superpower that I can take Lakota culture . . . and contemporary Indigenous experiences and translate them for white audiences, which unfortunately are still the majority of audiences in American theatre.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Playwright Larissa FastHorse on “The Thanksgiving Play,” Broadway’s New Comedy of White Wokeness</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>“The Thanksgiving Play” is a play about the making of a play. Four performers struggle to devise a Thanksgiving performance that’s respectful of Native peoples, historically accurate (while not too grim for white audiences), and also inclusive to the actors themselves. A train wreck ensues. “First it’s fun. . . . You get to have a good time in the theatre. I would say that’s the sugar, and then there’s the medicine,” the playwright Larissa FastHorse tells the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/vinson-cunningham"><span>Vinson Cunningham</span></a><span>. “The satire is the medicine, and you have to keep taking it.” FastHorse was born into the Sicangu Lakota Nation, and was adopted as a child into a white family. She is the first Native American woman to have a play produced on Broadway. “When I was younger, it was very painful to be separated from a lot of things that I felt like I couldn’t partake in because I wasn’t raised on the reservation or had been away from my Lakota family so long,” she says. “But now I really recognize it as my superpower that I can take Lakota culture . . . and contemporary Indigenous experiences and translate them for white audiences, which unfortunately are still the majority of audiences in American theatre.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>“The Thanksgiving Play” is a play about the making of a play. Four performers struggle to devise a Thanksgiving performance that’s respectful of Native peoples, historically accurate (while not too grim for white audiences), and also inclusive to the actors themselves. A train wreck ensues. “First it’s fun. . . . You get to have a good time in the theatre. I would say that’s the sugar, and then there’s the medicine,” the playwright Larissa FastHorse tells the staff writer Vinson Cunningham. “The satire is the medicine, and you have to keep taking it.” FastHorse was born into the Sicangu Lakota Nation, and was adopted as a child into a white family. She is the first Native American woman to have a play produced on Broadway. “When I was younger, it was very painful to be separated from a lot of things that I felt like I couldn’t partake in because I wasn’t raised on the reservation or had been away from my Lakota family so long,” she says. “But now I really recognize it as my superpower that I can take Lakota culture . . . and contemporary Indigenous experiences and translate them for white audiences, which unfortunately are still the majority of audiences in American theatre.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>What’s Behind the Bipartisan Attack on TikTok?
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/whats-behind-bipartisan-attack-tiktok-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;A ban of the Chinese social-media app TikTok, first floated by the Trump Administration, is now gaining real traction in Washington. Lawmakers of both parties fear the app could be manipulated by Chinese authorities to gain insight into American users and become an effective tool for propaganda against the United States. “Tiktok arrived in Americans’ lives in about 2018 . . . and in some ways it coincided with the same period of collapse in the U.S.-China relationship,” the staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/evan-osnos"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Evan Osnos&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; tells David Remnick. “If you’re a member of Congress, you look at TikTok and you say, ‘This is the clearest emblem of my concern about China, and this is something I can talk about and touch.’ ” Remnick also talks with the journalist Chris Stokel-Walker—who has written extensively about TikTok and argued against a ban—regarding the global political backlash against the app. “I think we should be suspicious of all social media, but I don’t think that TikTok is the attack vector that we think it is,” he says. “This is exactly the same as any other platform.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1539d52a-f636-4b4b-a323-a03792aef064</guid><enclosure length="31744000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour041423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1317250"/><category>china</category><category>congress</category><category>data</category><category>internet</category><category>national_news</category><category>politics</category><category>social_media</category><category>tech</category><category>technology</category><category>tik_tok</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour041423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1317250"/><media:description type="plain">What’s Behind the Bipartisan Attack on TikTok?
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2023/04/TNYradiohour04142023_IMAGE.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>33:04</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>A ban of the Chinese social-media app TikTok, first floated by the Trump Administration, is now gaining real traction in Washington. Lawmakers of both parties fear the app could be manipulated by Chinese authorities to gain insight into American users and become an effective tool for propaganda against the United States. “Tiktok arrived in Americans’ lives in about 2018 . . . and in some ways it coincided with the same period of collapse in the U.S.-China relationship,” the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/evan-osnos"><span>Evan Osnos</span></a><span> tells David Remnick. “If you’re a member of Congress, you look at TikTok and you say, ‘This is the clearest emblem of my concern about China, and this is something I can talk about and touch.’ ” Remnick also talks with the journalist Chris Stokel-Walker—who has written extensively about TikTok and argued against a ban—regarding the global political backlash against the app. “I think we should be suspicious of all social media, but I don’t think that TikTok is the attack vector that we think it is,” he says. “This is exactly the same as any other platform.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>What’s Behind the Bipartisan Attack on TikTok?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>A ban of the Chinese social-media app TikTok, first floated by the Trump Administration, is now gaining real traction in Washington. Lawmakers of both parties fear the app could be manipulated by Chinese authorities to gain insight into American users and become an effective tool for propaganda against the United States. “Tiktok arrived in Americans’ lives in about 2018 . . . and in some ways it coincided with the same period of collapse in the U.S.-China relationship,” the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/evan-osnos"><span>Evan Osnos</span></a><span> tells David Remnick. “If you’re a member of Congress, you look at TikTok and you say, ‘This is the clearest emblem of my concern about China, and this is something I can talk about and touch.’ ” Remnick also talks with the journalist Chris Stokel-Walker—who has written extensively about TikTok and argued against a ban—regarding the global political backlash against the app. “I think we should be suspicious of all social media, but I don’t think that TikTok is the attack vector that we think it is,” he says. “This is exactly the same as any other platform.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>A ban of the Chinese social-media app TikTok, first floated by the Trump Administration, is now gaining real traction in Washington. Lawmakers of both parties fear the app could be manipulated by Chinese authorities to gain insight into American users and become an effective tool for propaganda against the United States. “Tiktok arrived in Americans’ lives in about 2018 . . . and in some ways it coincided with the same period of collapse in the U.S.-China relationship,” the staff writer Evan Osnos tells David Remnick. “If you’re a member of Congress, you look at TikTok and you say, ‘This is the clearest emblem of my concern about China, and this is something I can talk about and touch.’ ” Remnick also talks with the journalist Chris Stokel-Walker—who has written extensively about TikTok and argued against a ban—regarding the global political backlash against the app. “I think we should be suspicious of all social media, but I don’t think that TikTok is the attack vector that we think it is,” he says. “This is exactly the same as any other platform.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Country Singer Margo Price Talks with Emily Nussbaum
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/country-singer-margo-price-talks-emily-nussbaum/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Margo Price moved to Nashville from rural Illinois at the age of nineteen. After struggling for years to break through in the country-music scene, she found success with her 2016 release “Midwest Farmer’s Daughter,” widely considered one of the best albums of the year. Since then, she’s established herself as one of music’s new stars, an artist in the outlaw-country lineage—and a free spirit not afraid to speak frankly. Price talks with the staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/emily-nussbaum"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Emily Nussbaum&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, who is well known as a television critic and is also a fan of country music, about her fourth studio album, “Strays.” It was released earlier this year, around the same time as her memoir, “Maybe We’ll Make It,” which discusses her years of struggle before establishing herself as an artist. They also discussed Price’s drug use—she speaks proudly of using psilocybin and her stance in favor of gun control in the wake of a school shooting in Nashville.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1f96e5f9-05e7-4c41-807c-b89244da2d4c</guid><enclosure length="17472000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour041123_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1315644"/><category>country_music</category><category>country_western_music</category><category>margo_price</category><category>music</category><category>outlaw_country</category><category>tennessee</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour041123_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1315644"/><media:description type="plain">The Country Singer Margo Price Talks with Emily Nussbaum
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/04/MargoPrice_AlysseGafkjen.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>18:12</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Margo Price moved to Nashville from rural Illinois at the age of nineteen. After struggling for years to break through in the country-music scene, she found success with her 2016 release “Midwest Farmer’s Daughter,” widely considered one of the best albums of the year. Since then, she’s established herself as one of music’s new stars, an artist in the outlaw-country lineage—and a free spirit not afraid to speak frankly. Price talks with the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/emily-nussbaum"><span>Emily Nussbaum</span></a><span>, who is well known as a television critic and is also a fan of country music, about her fourth studio album, “Strays.” It was released earlier this year, around the same time as her memoir, “Maybe We’ll Make It,” which discusses her years of struggle before establishing herself as an artist. They also discussed Price’s drug use—she speaks proudly of using psilocybin and her stance in favor of gun control in the wake of a school shooting in Nashville.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Country Singer Margo Price Talks with Emily Nussbaum</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Margo Price moved to Nashville from rural Illinois at the age of nineteen. After struggling for years to break through in the country-music scene, she found success with her 2016 release “Midwest Farmer’s Daughter,” widely considered one of the best albums of the year. Since then, she’s established herself as one of music’s new stars, an artist in the outlaw-country lineage—and a free spirit not afraid to speak frankly. Price talks with the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/emily-nussbaum"><span>Emily Nussbaum</span></a><span>, who is well known as a television critic and is also a fan of country music, about her fourth studio album, “Strays.” It was released earlier this year, around the same time as her memoir, “Maybe We’ll Make It,” which discusses her years of struggle before establishing herself as an artist. They also discussed Price’s drug use—she speaks proudly of using psilocybin and her stance in favor of gun control in the wake of a school shooting in Nashville.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Margo Price moved to Nashville from rural Illinois at the age of nineteen. After struggling for years to break through in the country-music scene, she found success with her 2016 release “Midwest Farmer’s Daughter,” widely considered one of the best albums of the year. Since then, she’s established herself as one of music’s new stars, an artist in the outlaw-country lineage—and a free spirit not afraid to speak frankly. Price talks with the staff writer Emily Nussbaum, who is well known as a television critic and is also a fan of country music, about her fourth studio album, “Strays.” It was released earlier this year, around the same time as her memoir, “Maybe We’ll Make It,” which discusses her years of struggle before establishing herself as an artist. They also discussed Price’s drug use—she speaks proudly of using psilocybin and her stance in favor of gun control in the wake of a school shooting in Nashville.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Israel on the Brink: Understanding the Judicial Overhaul, and the Protests Against It
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/israel-brink-understanding-judicial-overhaul-and-protests-against-it-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s proposed law changing the judiciary is described as a reform. To opponents, it’s a move to gut the independence of the Supreme Court as a check on executive power—and a move from the playbook of autocrats like Hungary’s Viktor Orbán. The protests that followed are the largest in the country’s history, and are now stretching into their third month. Ruth Margalit, who is based in Tel Aviv, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-jerusalem/israels-transformative-protest-movement"&gt;&lt;span&gt;covered&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; the protests for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;, and she tells David Remnick that the strength and success of the protests so far has brought a sense of hope for many who were losing faith in the country’s political future. “I think there is a sign of optimism. There is this potential for a kind of political realignment,” she says. “I do have some friends who were thinking of leaving and suddenly are saying, ‘Well, let’s just see how this plays out.’ And they suddenly feel that they have a role.” Remnick also speaks with Margalit’s father, the political philosopher Avishai Margalit, about demographic and cultural factors driving Israeli politics. The nation has been moving to the right probably since the failure of the Oslo peace accords in the nineteen-nineties, but “the new element,” Avishai thinks, “is the strong fusion of religion and nationalism,” elements that were once kept separate in Israel. “The current government is utterly dependent on the votes of the religious and the ultra-religious,” he says. The big unknown, Ruth says, is whether the popular uprising will expand beyond the judicial reforms. “Let’s say the fight over democracy is won—what happens then?” she says. “Can we branch out this fight over democracy? Can it include the West Bank and bring an end to the occupation?”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7141eab3-6a18-4fec-bc9c-4ead4c6f92b3</guid><enclosure length="31120000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour040723_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1315642"/><category>israel</category><category>judicial_reform</category><category>netanyahu</category><category>news</category><category>palestine</category><category>politics</category><category>protests</category><category>religion_faith</category><category>social_justice</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour040723_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1315642"/><media:description type="plain">Israel on the Brink: Understanding the Judicial Overhaul, and the Protests Against It
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/04/TNYradiohour04072023_IMAGE.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>32:25</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s proposed law changing the judiciary is described as a reform. To opponents, it’s a move to gut the independence of the Supreme Court as a check on executive power—and a move from the playbook of autocrats like Hungary’s Viktor Orbán. The protests that followed are the largest in the country’s history, and are now stretching into their third month. Ruth Margalit, who is based in Tel Aviv, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-jerusalem/israels-transformative-protest-movement"><span>covered</span></a><span> the protests for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span>, and she tells David Remnick that the strength and success of the protests so far has brought a sense of hope for many who were losing faith in the country’s political future. “I think there is a sign of optimism. There is this potential for a kind of political realignment,” she says. “I do have some friends who were thinking of leaving and suddenly are saying, ‘Well, let’s just see how this plays out.’ And they suddenly feel that they have a role.” Remnick also speaks with Margalit’s father, the political philosopher Avishai Margalit, about demographic and cultural factors driving Israeli politics. The nation has been moving to the right probably since the failure of the Oslo peace accords in the nineteen-nineties, but “the new element,” Avishai thinks, “is the strong fusion of religion and nationalism,” elements that were once kept separate in Israel. “The current government is utterly dependent on the votes of the religious and the ultra-religious,” he says. The big unknown, Ruth says, is whether the popular uprising will expand beyond the judicial reforms. “Let’s say the fight over democracy is won—what happens then?” she says. “Can we branch out this fight over democracy? Can it include the West Bank and bring an end to the occupation?”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Israel on the Brink: Understanding the Judicial Overhaul, and the Protests Against It</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s proposed law changing the judiciary is described as a reform. To opponents, it’s a move to gut the independence of the Supreme Court as a check on executive power—and a move from the playbook of autocrats like Hungary’s Viktor Orbán. The protests that followed are the largest in the country’s history, and are now stretching into their third month. Ruth Margalit, who is based in Tel Aviv, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-jerusalem/israels-transformative-protest-movement"><span>covered</span></a><span> the protests for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span>, and she tells David Remnick that the strength and success of the protests so far has brought a sense of hope for many who were losing faith in the country’s political future. “I think there is a sign of optimism. There is this potential for a kind of political realignment,” she says. “I do have some friends who were thinking of leaving and suddenly are saying, ‘Well, let’s just see how this plays out.’ And they suddenly feel that they have a role.” Remnick also speaks with Margalit’s father, the political philosopher Avishai Margalit, about demographic and cultural factors driving Israeli politics. The nation has been moving to the right probably since the failure of the Oslo peace accords in the nineteen-nineties, but “the new element,” Avishai thinks, “is the strong fusion of religion and nationalism,” elements that were once kept separate in Israel. “The current government is utterly dependent on the votes of the religious and the ultra-religious,” he says. The big unknown, Ruth says, is whether the popular uprising will expand beyond the judicial reforms. “Let’s say the fight over democracy is won—what happens then?” she says. “Can we branch out this fight over democracy? Can it include the West Bank and bring an end to the occupation?”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s proposed law changing the judiciary is described as a reform. To opponents, it’s a move to gut the independence of the Supreme Court as a check on executive power—and a move from the playbook of autocrats like Hungary’s Viktor Orbán. The protests that followed are the largest in the country’s history, and are now stretching into their third month. Ruth Margalit, who is based in Tel Aviv, covered the protests for The New Yorker, and she tells David Remnick that the strength and success of the protests so far has brought a sense of hope for many who were losing faith in the country’s political future. “I think there is a sign of optimism. There is this potential for a kind of political realignment,” she says. “I do have some friends who were thinking of leaving and suddenly are saying, ‘Well, let’s just see how this plays out.’ And they suddenly feel that they have a role.” Remnick also speaks with Margalit’s father, the political philosopher Avishai Margalit, about demographic and cultural factors driving Israeli politics. The nation has been moving to the right probably since the failure of the Oslo peace accords in the nineteen-nineties, but “the new element,” Avishai thinks, “is the strong fusion of religion and nationalism,” elements that were once kept separate in Israel. “The current government is utterly dependent on the votes of the religious and the ultra-religious,” he says. The big unknown, Ruth says, is whether the popular uprising will expand beyond the judicial reforms. “Let’s say the fight over democracy is won—what happens then?” she says. “Can we branch out this fight over democracy? Can it include the West Bank and bring an end to the occupation?”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Brooke Shields on the Sexualization of Girls in Hollywood
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/brooke-shields-sexualization-girls-hollywood/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In the late nineteen-seventies and into the eighties, Brooke Shields was one of the most famous and most controversial people in America. At age eleven, she appeared in the film “Pretty Baby,” playing a child prostitute; by fifteen she was in the heavy-breathing desert-island love story “Blue Lagoon.” She was the face of a series of ads for Calvin Klein jeans featuring notoriously smutty innuendo. Yet Shields herself—rather than the filmmakers and ad men who developed her roles—became the object of fascination and public reproach, as the new documentary “Pretty Baby: Brooke Shields,” premièring on Hulu, demonstrates in detail. Yet, if she was exploited by adults around her when she was young, Shields denies any sense of being a victim. In a conversation with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Michael Schulman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, she calls hypocrisy on models who criticize their industry. “You’re making money, and you’re selling something, and, in most cases, sex sells,” she says. “ ‘Oh, I’m being objectified.’ You’re a model! That’s the point!” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d9c60331-3a82-40af-8353-985517d62fc3</guid><enclosure length="20048000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour040423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1313131"/><category>actress</category><category>arts</category><category>entertainment</category><category>hollywood</category><category>model</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour040423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1313131"/><media:description type="plain">Brooke Shields on the Sexualization of Girls in Hollywood
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/03/BrookeShields_AP23022035875314.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>20:53</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>In the late nineteen-seventies and into the eighties, Brooke Shields was one of the most famous and most controversial people in America. At age eleven, she appeared in the film “Pretty Baby,” playing a child prostitute; by fifteen she was in the heavy-breathing desert-island love story “Blue Lagoon.” She was the face of a series of ads for Calvin Klein jeans featuring notoriously smutty innuendo. Yet Shields herself—rather than the filmmakers and ad men who developed her roles—became the object of fascination and public reproach, as the new documentary “Pretty Baby: Brooke Shields,” premièring on Hulu, demonstrates in detail. Yet, if she was exploited by adults around her when she was young, Shields denies any sense of being a victim. In a conversation with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"><span>Michael Schulman</span></a><span>, she calls hypocrisy on models who criticize their industry. “You’re making money, and you’re selling something, and, in most cases, sex sells,” she says. “ ‘Oh, I’m being objectified.’ You’re a model! That’s the point!” </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Brooke Shields on the Sexualization of Girls in Hollywood</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>In the late nineteen-seventies and into the eighties, Brooke Shields was one of the most famous and most controversial people in America. At age eleven, she appeared in the film “Pretty Baby,” playing a child prostitute; by fifteen she was in the heavy-breathing desert-island love story “Blue Lagoon.” She was the face of a series of ads for Calvin Klein jeans featuring notoriously smutty innuendo. Yet Shields herself—rather than the filmmakers and ad men who developed her roles—became the object of fascination and public reproach, as the new documentary “Pretty Baby: Brooke Shields,” premièring on Hulu, demonstrates in detail. Yet, if she was exploited by adults around her when she was young, Shields denies any sense of being a victim. In a conversation with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"><span>Michael Schulman</span></a><span>, she calls hypocrisy on models who criticize their industry. “You’re making money, and you’re selling something, and, in most cases, sex sells,” she says. “ ‘Oh, I’m being objectified.’ You’re a model! That’s the point!” </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>In the late nineteen-seventies and into the eighties, Brooke Shields was one of the most famous and most controversial people in America. At age eleven, she appeared in the film “Pretty Baby,” playing a child prostitute; by fifteen she was in the heavy-breathing desert-island love story “Blue Lagoon.” She was the face of a series of ads for Calvin Klein jeans featuring notoriously smutty innuendo. Yet Shields herself—rather than the filmmakers and ad men who developed her roles—became the object of fascination and public reproach, as the new documentary “Pretty Baby: Brooke Shields,” premièring on Hulu, demonstrates in detail. Yet, if she was exploited by adults around her when she was young, Shields denies any sense of being a victim. In a conversation with Michael Schulman, she calls hypocrisy on models who criticize their industry. “You’re making money, and you’re selling something, and, in most cases, sex sells,” she says. “ ‘Oh, I’m being objectified.’ You’re a model! That’s the point!”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Jon Meacham on How the Trump Fever Breaks
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/jon-meacham-how-trump-fever-breaks-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In 2018, at the midpoint of the Trump Presidency, the journalist and historian Jon Meacham wrote a book called “The Soul of America,” warning of the gravity of Trump’s threat to democracy. This was hardly a unique point of view, but Meacham’s particular way of putting things, steeped in a critical reverence for American history, hit home with one reader in particular: Joe Biden. In the years since, Meacham became an informal adviser to Biden, helping him recently with the State of the Union address. Meacham, who has written biographies of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, George H. W. Bush, John Lewis, and, now, Abraham Lincoln, reflects on the vulnerability of American democracy in the current moment, with an overt autocrat as the leading Republican contender for the next Presidential election. “Having a dictatorial figure is not new either in human experience or American history. What is new is that so many people are willing to suspend their better judgment to support him,” he says. “I am flummoxed to some extent at the durability of partisan feeling.” Plus, the music critic Kelefa Sanneh on a fleet of artists bringing fresh sounds to what has become the least cool genre: mainstream rock. He shares tracks by &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;HARDY&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;, Giovannie &amp;amp; the Hired Guns, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;AVOID&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;, and Jelly Roll.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1c386adc-9e7f-4406-96a2-c7485a585070</guid><enclosure length="29488000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour033123_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1312969"/><category>breaking_news</category><category>court</category><category>donald_trump</category><category>legal</category><category>national_news</category><category>news</category><category>politics</category><category>presidents</category><category>radio</category><category>rock</category><category>social_justice</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour033123_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1312969"/><media:description type="plain">Jon Meacham on How the Trump Fever Breaks
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/09/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>30:43</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>In 2018, at the midpoint of the Trump Presidency, the journalist and historian Jon Meacham wrote a book called “The Soul of America,” warning of the gravity of Trump’s threat to democracy. This was hardly a unique point of view, but Meacham’s particular way of putting things, steeped in a critical reverence for American history, hit home with one reader in particular: Joe Biden. In the years since, Meacham became an informal adviser to Biden, helping him recently with the State of the Union address. Meacham, who has written biographies of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, George H. W. Bush, John Lewis, and, now, Abraham Lincoln, reflects on the vulnerability of American democracy in the current moment, with an overt autocrat as the leading Republican contender for the next Presidential election. “Having a dictatorial figure is not new either in human experience or American history. What is new is that so many people are willing to suspend their better judgment to support him,” he says. “I am flummoxed to some extent at the durability of partisan feeling.” Plus, the music critic Kelefa Sanneh on a fleet of artists bringing fresh sounds to what has become the least cool genre: mainstream rock. He shares tracks by </span><span>HARDY</span><span>, Giovannie &amp; the Hired Guns, </span><span>AVOID</span><span>, and Jelly Roll.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Jon Meacham on How the Trump Fever Breaks</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>In 2018, at the midpoint of the Trump Presidency, the journalist and historian Jon Meacham wrote a book called “The Soul of America,” warning of the gravity of Trump’s threat to democracy. This was hardly a unique point of view, but Meacham’s particular way of putting things, steeped in a critical reverence for American history, hit home with one reader in particular: Joe Biden. In the years since, Meacham became an informal adviser to Biden, helping him recently with the State of the Union address. Meacham, who has written biographies of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, George H. W. Bush, John Lewis, and, now, Abraham Lincoln, reflects on the vulnerability of American democracy in the current moment, with an overt autocrat as the leading Republican contender for the next Presidential election. “Having a dictatorial figure is not new either in human experience or American history. What is new is that so many people are willing to suspend their better judgment to support him,” he says. “I am flummoxed to some extent at the durability of partisan feeling.” Plus, the music critic Kelefa Sanneh on a fleet of artists bringing fresh sounds to what has become the least cool genre: mainstream rock. He shares tracks by </span><span>HARDY</span><span>, Giovannie &amp; the Hired Guns, </span><span>AVOID</span><span>, and Jelly Roll.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>In 2018, at the midpoint of the Trump Presidency, the journalist and historian Jon Meacham wrote a book called “The Soul of America,” warning of the gravity of Trump’s threat to democracy. This was hardly a unique point of view, but Meacham’s particular way of putting things, steeped in a critical reverence for American history, hit home with one reader in particular: Joe Biden. In the years since, Meacham became an informal adviser to Biden, helping him recently with the State of the Union address. Meacham, who has written biographies of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, George H. W. Bush, John Lewis, and, now, Abraham Lincoln, reflects on the vulnerability of American democracy in the current moment, with an overt autocrat as the leading Republican contender for the next Presidential election. “Having a dictatorial figure is not new either in human experience or American history. What is new is that so many people are willing to suspend their better judgment to support him,” he says. “I am flummoxed to some extent at the durability of partisan feeling.” Plus, the music critic Kelefa Sanneh on a fleet of artists bringing fresh sounds to what has become the least cool genre: mainstream rock. He shares tracks by HARDY, Giovannie &amp;amp; the Hired Guns, AVOID, and Jelly Roll.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Who Was H. G. Carrillo? D. T. Max on a Novelist Whose Fictions Went Too Far
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/who-was-h-g-carrillo-d-t-max-novelist-whose-fictions-went-too-far/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;H. G. Carrillo was a writer’s writer—not a household name, but esteemed in literary circles. He began writing later in life, and was in his mid-forties when his first novel, “Loosing My Espanish,” was published. The book, which describes a Cuban-immigrant experience, was hailed as a triumph of Latino fiction; Junot Díaz praised the author’s “formidable” talent, calling his “lyricism pitch-perfect and his compassion limitless.” Carrillo went on to literary positions in and outside of the academy. He was an early casualty of the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;COVID&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; pandemic, dying in the spring of 2020 at the age of fifty-nine. But his &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/cuban-american-author-hg-carrillo-who-explored-themes-of-cultural-alienation-died-after-contracting-covid-19/2020/05/21/35478894-97d8-11ea-91d7-cf4423d47683_story.html"&gt;&lt;span&gt;obituary&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;—instead of tying a bow on the historical record—unspooled in quite a different direction, revealing secrets that Carrillo had worked for decades to conceal. For two years, the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/d-t-max"&gt;&lt;span&gt;staff writer D. T. Max &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;has been trying to trace what happened, and why. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8eed00cc-ac7f-4014-9dbd-c1a60a603b8b</guid><enclosure length="31600000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour032823_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1311333"/><category>arts</category><category>books</category><category>cuba</category><category>fiction</category><category>latin_america</category><category>literature</category><category>news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour032823_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1311333"/><media:description type="plain">Who Was H. G. Carrillo? D. T. Max on a Novelist Whose Fictions Went Too Far
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/03/22041_cabin-11.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>32:55</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>H. G. Carrillo was a writer’s writer—not a household name, but esteemed in literary circles. He began writing later in life, and was in his mid-forties when his first novel, “Loosing My Espanish,” was published. The book, which describes a Cuban-immigrant experience, was hailed as a triumph of Latino fiction; Junot Díaz praised the author’s “formidable” talent, calling his “lyricism pitch-perfect and his compassion limitless.” Carrillo went on to literary positions in and outside of the academy. He was an early casualty of the </span><span>COVID</span><span> pandemic, dying in the spring of 2020 at the age of fifty-nine. But his </span><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/cuban-american-author-hg-carrillo-who-explored-themes-of-cultural-alienation-died-after-contracting-covid-19/2020/05/21/35478894-97d8-11ea-91d7-cf4423d47683_story.html"><span>obituary</span></a><span>—instead of tying a bow on the historical record—unspooled in quite a different direction, revealing secrets that Carrillo had worked for decades to conceal. For two years, the </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/d-t-max"><span>staff writer D. T. Max </span></a><span>has been trying to trace what happened, and why. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Who Was H. G. Carrillo? D. T. Max on a Novelist Whose Fictions Went Too Far</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>H. G. Carrillo was a writer’s writer—not a household name, but esteemed in literary circles. He began writing later in life, and was in his mid-forties when his first novel, “Loosing My Espanish,” was published. The book, which describes a Cuban-immigrant experience, was hailed as a triumph of Latino fiction; Junot Díaz praised the author’s “formidable” talent, calling his “lyricism pitch-perfect and his compassion limitless.” Carrillo went on to literary positions in and outside of the academy. He was an early casualty of the </span><span>COVID</span><span> pandemic, dying in the spring of 2020 at the age of fifty-nine. But his </span><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/cuban-american-author-hg-carrillo-who-explored-themes-of-cultural-alienation-died-after-contracting-covid-19/2020/05/21/35478894-97d8-11ea-91d7-cf4423d47683_story.html"><span>obituary</span></a><span>—instead of tying a bow on the historical record—unspooled in quite a different direction, revealing secrets that Carrillo had worked for decades to conceal. For two years, the </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/d-t-max"><span>staff writer D. T. Max </span></a><span>has been trying to trace what happened, and why. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>H. G. Carrillo was a writer’s writer—not a household name, but esteemed in literary circles. He began writing later in life, and was in his mid-forties when his first novel, “Loosing My Espanish,” was published. The book, which describes a Cuban-immigrant experience, was hailed as a triumph of Latino fiction; Junot Díaz praised the author’s “formidable” talent, calling his “lyricism pitch-perfect and his compassion limitless.” Carrillo went on to literary positions in and outside of the academy. He was an early casualty of the COVID pandemic, dying in the spring of 2020 at the age of fifty-nine. But his obituary—instead of tying a bow on the historical record—unspooled in quite a different direction, revealing secrets that Carrillo had worked for decades to conceal. For two years, the staff writer D. T. Max has been trying to trace what happened, and why.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Jia Tolentino on the Ozempic Weight-Loss Craze
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/jia-tolentino-ozempic-weight-loss-craze-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The prescription drug Ozempic was designed to help people with Type 2 diabetes manage their disease, and, under the name Wegovy, to treat obesity. But it has been embraced recently as a tool for weight loss, and many celebrities are rumored to use it in order to shed pounds. Known generically as semaglutide, the drug gives users the feeling of satiation—even to the point of uncomfortable fullness. “One doctor I spoke to compared it to a turkey dinner in a pen,” the staff writer Jia Tolentino tells David Remnick. Tolentino &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/03/27/will-the-ozempic-era-change-how-we-think-about-being-fat-and-being-thin"&gt;&lt;span&gt;recently reported on&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; the use and misuse of the drug, and what its prominence among celebrities says about our relationship to thinness today. After some years in which body culture seemed to become more accepting, Tolentino fears the drug will wind the clock back to the brutal insistence on thinness of decades past. “Like any technology, it’s very complicated,” she says. “For some people, this drug might save their lives. For others, it does not make sense to be used in any casual way.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e1af97ec-6875-456d-ba59-8d8342f609d8</guid><enclosure length="16688000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour032423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1311332"/><category>diet</category><category>health</category><category>national_news</category><category>ozempic</category><category>politics</category><category>science</category><category>technology</category><category>weight_loss</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour032423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1311332"/><media:description type="plain">Jia Tolentino on the Ozempic Weight-Loss Craze
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/03/TNY032423_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>17:23</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The prescription drug Ozempic was designed to help people with Type 2 diabetes manage their disease, and, under the name Wegovy, to treat obesity. But it has been embraced recently as a tool for weight loss, and many celebrities are rumored to use it in order to shed pounds. Known generically as semaglutide, the drug gives users the feeling of satiation—even to the point of uncomfortable fullness. “One doctor I spoke to compared it to a turkey dinner in a pen,” the staff writer Jia Tolentino tells David Remnick. Tolentino </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/03/27/will-the-ozempic-era-change-how-we-think-about-being-fat-and-being-thin"><span>recently reported on</span></a><span> the use and misuse of the drug, and what its prominence among celebrities says about our relationship to thinness today. After some years in which body culture seemed to become more accepting, Tolentino fears the drug will wind the clock back to the brutal insistence on thinness of decades past. “Like any technology, it’s very complicated,” she says. “For some people, this drug might save their lives. For others, it does not make sense to be used in any casual way.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Jia Tolentino on the Ozempic Weight-Loss Craze</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The prescription drug Ozempic was designed to help people with Type 2 diabetes manage their disease, and, under the name Wegovy, to treat obesity. But it has been embraced recently as a tool for weight loss, and many celebrities are rumored to use it in order to shed pounds. Known generically as semaglutide, the drug gives users the feeling of satiation—even to the point of uncomfortable fullness. “One doctor I spoke to compared it to a turkey dinner in a pen,” the staff writer Jia Tolentino tells David Remnick. Tolentino </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/03/27/will-the-ozempic-era-change-how-we-think-about-being-fat-and-being-thin"><span>recently reported on</span></a><span> the use and misuse of the drug, and what its prominence among celebrities says about our relationship to thinness today. After some years in which body culture seemed to become more accepting, Tolentino fears the drug will wind the clock back to the brutal insistence on thinness of decades past. “Like any technology, it’s very complicated,” she says. “For some people, this drug might save their lives. For others, it does not make sense to be used in any casual way.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The prescription drug Ozempic was designed to help people with Type 2 diabetes manage their disease, and, under the name Wegovy, to treat obesity. But it has been embraced recently as a tool for weight loss, and many celebrities are rumored to use it in order to shed pounds. Known generically as semaglutide, the drug gives users the feeling of satiation—even to the point of uncomfortable fullness. “One doctor I spoke to compared it to a turkey dinner in a pen,” the staff writer Jia Tolentino tells David Remnick. Tolentino recently reported on the use and misuse of the drug, and what its prominence among celebrities says about our relationship to thinness today. After some years in which body culture seemed to become more accepting, Tolentino fears the drug will wind the clock back to the brutal insistence on thinness of decades past. “Like any technology, it’s very complicated,” she says. “For some people, this drug might save their lives. For others, it does not make sense to be used in any casual way.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>How the Culture Wars Came to the Catholic Church
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/how-culture-wars-came-catholic-church/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The pontificate of Pope Francis, which just reached its tenth year, has brought a greater willingness to engage with modern issues. Francis has addressed Catholics on the climate emergency, arguing a religious position against consumerism and irresponsible development. Without changing the Church’s doctrines, he struck a very different tone than his predecessors Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI on the inclusion of gay people and the involvement of women in Church leadership. The traditionalist reaction against Francis has also been unprecedented, with prominent figures in the Church openly seeking to discredit him. The &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;New Yorker &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;contributor Paul Elie, who recently &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/how-a-decade-of-pope-francis-has-changed-the-church"&gt;&lt;span&gt;wrote about&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; this decade of Francis’s leadership, explores how tensions in the Church were overtaken by an American-style culture war. Elie speaks with Bishop Frank Caggiano, of Bridgeport, Connecticut, and M. Cathleen Kaveny, a prominent law professor and theologian at Boston College. “For John Paul,” Kaveny says, “the main challenge that the faith faced was moral relativism. The conservatives . . . are worried that [moral relativism] is not appreciated by Pope Francis.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">16631013-d2f0-46bc-b2c0-6d043cbdb5f8</guid><enclosure length="21088000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour032123_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1309578"/><category>catholic_church</category><category>news</category><category>politics</category><category>pope</category><category>pope_francis</category><category>protests</category><category>religion_faith</category><category>social_justice</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour032123_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1309578"/><media:description type="plain">How the Culture Wars Came to the Catholic Church
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/03/PopeFrancis_AP23067350030543.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>21:58</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The pontificate of Pope Francis, which just reached its tenth year, has brought a greater willingness to engage with modern issues. Francis has addressed Catholics on the climate emergency, arguing a religious position against consumerism and irresponsible development. Without changing the Church’s doctrines, he struck a very different tone than his predecessors Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI on the inclusion of gay people and the involvement of women in Church leadership. The traditionalist reaction against Francis has also been unprecedented, with prominent figures in the Church openly seeking to discredit him. The </span><i><span>New Yorker </span></i><span>contributor Paul Elie, who recently </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/how-a-decade-of-pope-francis-has-changed-the-church"><span>wrote about</span></a><span> this decade of Francis’s leadership, explores how tensions in the Church were overtaken by an American-style culture war. Elie speaks with Bishop Frank Caggiano, of Bridgeport, Connecticut, and M. Cathleen Kaveny, a prominent law professor and theologian at Boston College. “For John Paul,” Kaveny says, “the main challenge that the faith faced was moral relativism. The conservatives . . . are worried that [moral relativism] is not appreciated by Pope Francis.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>How the Culture Wars Came to the Catholic Church</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The pontificate of Pope Francis, which just reached its tenth year, has brought a greater willingness to engage with modern issues. Francis has addressed Catholics on the climate emergency, arguing a religious position against consumerism and irresponsible development. Without changing the Church’s doctrines, he struck a very different tone than his predecessors Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI on the inclusion of gay people and the involvement of women in Church leadership. The traditionalist reaction against Francis has also been unprecedented, with prominent figures in the Church openly seeking to discredit him. The </span><i><span>New Yorker </span></i><span>contributor Paul Elie, who recently </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/how-a-decade-of-pope-francis-has-changed-the-church"><span>wrote about</span></a><span> this decade of Francis’s leadership, explores how tensions in the Church were overtaken by an American-style culture war. Elie speaks with Bishop Frank Caggiano, of Bridgeport, Connecticut, and M. Cathleen Kaveny, a prominent law professor and theologian at Boston College. “For John Paul,” Kaveny says, “the main challenge that the faith faced was moral relativism. The conservatives . . . are worried that [moral relativism] is not appreciated by Pope Francis.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The pontificate of Pope Francis, which just reached its tenth year, has brought a greater willingness to engage with modern issues. Francis has addressed Catholics on the climate emergency, arguing a religious position against consumerism and irresponsible development. Without changing the Church’s doctrines, he struck a very different tone than his predecessors Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI on the inclusion of gay people and the involvement of women in Church leadership. The traditionalist reaction against Francis has also been unprecedented, with prominent figures in the Church openly seeking to discredit him. The New Yorker contributor Paul Elie, who recently wrote about this decade of Francis’s leadership, explores how tensions in the Church were overtaken by an American-style culture war. Elie speaks with Bishop Frank Caggiano, of Bridgeport, Connecticut, and M. Cathleen Kaveny, a prominent law professor and theologian at Boston College. “For John Paul,” Kaveny says, “the main challenge that the faith faced was moral relativism. The conservatives . . . are worried that [moral relativism] is not appreciated by Pope Francis.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>What if the Supreme Court Ends Affirmative Action?
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/what-if-supreme-court-ends-affirmative-action-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority appears likely to strike down affirmative action, in a decision expected by this summer. The practice of considering race as a tool to counteract discrimination has been in place at many colleges and universities, and in some workplaces, since the civil-rights era. But a long-running legal campaign has threatened the practice for decades. David Remnick talks with two academics who have had a front-row seat in this fight. Ruth Simmons tells him, “For me, it’s quite simply the question of what will become of us as a nation if we go into our separate enclaves without the opportunity to interact and to learn from each other.” Simmons was the Ivy League’s first Black president, and more recently led Prairie View A. &amp;amp; M., in Texas. Lee Bollinger, while leading the University of Michigan, was the defendant in Grutter v. Bollinger, a landmark case twenty years ago in which the Supreme Court upheld affirmative action. The Court’s current conservative majority is likely to overturn that precedent.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Remnick also speaks with Femi Ogundele, the dean of undergraduate admissions at the University of California,Berkeley. Consideration of race in admissions at California state schools has been banned for nearly thirty years. “A lot of us are being kind of tapped on the shoulder and asked, ‘How are you doing what you’re doing in this new reality?’ ” he says. “I want to be very clear: I do not think there is any race-neutral alternative to creating diversity on a college campus,” Ogundele tells Remnick. “However, I do think we can do better than what we’ve done.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">aee669ee-d9a6-4869-b4b2-f5157fbe626c</guid><enclosure length="27232000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour031723_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1309577"/><category>affirmative_action</category><category>education</category><category>history</category><category>national_news</category><category>politics</category><category>protests</category><category>racism</category><category>social_justice</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour031723_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1309577"/><media:description type="plain">What if the Supreme Court Ends Affirmative Action?
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/03/tnyradiohour_20230316_IMAGE.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>28:22</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority appears likely to strike down affirmative action, in a decision expected by this summer. The practice of considering race as a tool to counteract discrimination has been in place at many colleges and universities, and in some workplaces, since the civil-rights era. But a long-running legal campaign has threatened the practice for decades. David Remnick talks with two academics who have had a front-row seat in this fight. Ruth Simmons tells him, “For me, it’s quite simply the question of what will become of us as a nation if we go into our separate enclaves without the opportunity to interact and to learn from each other.” Simmons was the Ivy League’s first Black president, and more recently led Prairie View A. &amp; M., in Texas. Lee Bollinger, while leading the University of Michigan, was the defendant in Grutter v. Bollinger, a landmark case twenty years ago in which the Supreme Court upheld affirmative action. The Court’s current conservative majority is likely to overturn that precedent.</span></p>
<p><span>Remnick also speaks with Femi Ogundele, the dean of undergraduate admissions at the University of California,Berkeley. Consideration of race in admissions at California state schools has been banned for nearly thirty years. “A lot of us are being kind of tapped on the shoulder and asked, ‘How are you doing what you’re doing in this new reality?’ ” he says. “I want to be very clear: I do not think there is any race-neutral alternative to creating diversity on a college campus,” Ogundele tells Remnick. “However, I do think we can do better than what we’ve done.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>What if the Supreme Court Ends Affirmative Action?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority appears likely to strike down affirmative action, in a decision expected by this summer. The practice of considering race as a tool to counteract discrimination has been in place at many colleges and universities, and in some workplaces, since the civil-rights era. But a long-running legal campaign has threatened the practice for decades. David Remnick talks with two academics who have had a front-row seat in this fight. Ruth Simmons tells him, “For me, it’s quite simply the question of what will become of us as a nation if we go into our separate enclaves without the opportunity to interact and to learn from each other.” Simmons was the Ivy League’s first Black president, and more recently led Prairie View A. &amp; M., in Texas. Lee Bollinger, while leading the University of Michigan, was the defendant in Grutter v. Bollinger, a landmark case twenty years ago in which the Supreme Court upheld affirmative action. The Court’s current conservative majority is likely to overturn that precedent.</span></p>
<p><span>Remnick also speaks with Femi Ogundele, the dean of undergraduate admissions at the University of California,Berkeley. Consideration of race in admissions at California state schools has been banned for nearly thirty years. “A lot of us are being kind of tapped on the shoulder and asked, ‘How are you doing what you’re doing in this new reality?’ ” he says. “I want to be very clear: I do not think there is any race-neutral alternative to creating diversity on a college campus,” Ogundele tells Remnick. “However, I do think we can do better than what we’ve done.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority appears likely to strike down affirmative action, in a decision expected by this summer. The practice of considering race as a tool to counteract discrimination has been in place at many colleges and universities, and in some workplaces, since the civil-rights era. But a long-running legal campaign has threatened the practice for decades. David Remnick talks with two academics who have had a front-row seat in this fight. Ruth Simmons tells him, “For me, it’s quite simply the question of what will become of us as a nation if we go into our separate enclaves without the opportunity to interact and to learn from each other.” Simmons was the Ivy League’s first Black president, and more recently led Prairie View A. &amp;amp; M., in Texas. Lee Bollinger, while leading the University of Michigan, was the defendant in Grutter v. Bollinger, a landmark case twenty years ago in which the Supreme Court upheld affirmative action. The Court’s current conservative majority is likely to overturn that precedent. Remnick also speaks with Femi Ogundele, the dean of undergraduate admissions at the University of California,Berkeley. Consideration of race in admissions at California state schools has been banned for nearly thirty years. “A lot of us are being kind of tapped on the shoulder and asked, ‘How are you doing what you’re doing in this new reality?’ ” he says. “I want to be very clear: I do not think there is any race-neutral alternative to creating diversity on a college campus,” Ogundele tells Remnick. “However, I do think we can do better than what we’ve done.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Trans Activist Janet Mock Finds Her Voice
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/trans-activist-janet-mock-finds-her-voice/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Janet Mock first heard the word “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;māhū&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;,” a Native Hawaiian word for people who exist outside the male-female binary, when she was twelve. She had just moved back to Oahu, where she was born, from Texas, and, by that point, Mock knew that the gender she presented as didn’t feel right. “I don’t like to say the word ‘trapped,’ ” Mock tells &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; Hilton Als. “But I was feeling very, very tightly contained in my body.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Eventually, Mock left Hawaii for New York, where she worked as an editor for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;People &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;magazine. “[Everyone was] bigger and louder and smarter and bolder than me,” she tells Als. “So, in that sense, I could kind of blend in.” After working at &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;People&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; for five years, she came out publicly as trans; since then, she has emerged as a leading voice on trans issues. She’s written two books, produced a documentary, and signed a deal with Netflix. In 2018, she became the first trans woman of color to be hired as a writer on a TV series—Ryan Murphy’s FX series “Pose,” which just concluded its final season.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This story originally aired January 4, 2019&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:53:44 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9bbeb772-ab87-4e52-b651-556cf8b50c11</guid><enclosure length="24192000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour031423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1308536"/><category>national_news</category><category>new_yorker_festival</category><category>politics</category><category>pose</category><category>protests</category><category>social_justice</category><category>storytelling</category><category>trans</category><category>trans_rights</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour031423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1308536"/><media:description type="plain">Trans Activist Janet Mock Finds Her Voice
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/09/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>25:12</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Janet Mock first heard the word “</span><i><span>māhū</span></i><span>,” a Native Hawaiian word for people who exist outside the male-female binary, when she was twelve. She had just moved back to Oahu, where she was born, from Texas, and, by that point, Mock knew that the gender she presented as didn’t feel right. “I don’t like to say the word ‘trapped,’ ” Mock tells </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> Hilton Als. “But I was feeling very, very tightly contained in my body.” </span></p>
<p><span>Eventually, Mock left Hawaii for New York, where she worked as an editor for </span><i><span>People </span></i><span>magazine. “[Everyone was] bigger and louder and smarter and bolder than me,” she tells Als. “So, in that sense, I could kind of blend in.” After working at </span><i><span>People</span></i><span> for five years, she came out publicly as trans; since then, she has emerged as a leading voice on trans issues. She’s written two books, produced a documentary, and signed a deal with Netflix. In 2018, she became the first trans woman of color to be hired as a writer on a TV series—Ryan Murphy’s FX series “Pose,” which just concluded its final season.</span></p>
<p><i><span>This story originally aired January 4, 2019</span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Trans Activist Janet Mock Finds Her Voice</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Janet Mock first heard the word “</span><i><span>māhū</span></i><span>,” a Native Hawaiian word for people who exist outside the male-female binary, when she was twelve. She had just moved back to Oahu, where she was born, from Texas, and, by that point, Mock knew that the gender she presented as didn’t feel right. “I don’t like to say the word ‘trapped,’ ” Mock tells </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> Hilton Als. “But I was feeling very, very tightly contained in my body.” </span></p>
<p><span>Eventually, Mock left Hawaii for New York, where she worked as an editor for </span><i><span>People </span></i><span>magazine. “[Everyone was] bigger and louder and smarter and bolder than me,” she tells Als. “So, in that sense, I could kind of blend in.” After working at </span><i><span>People</span></i><span> for five years, she came out publicly as trans; since then, she has emerged as a leading voice on trans issues. She’s written two books, produced a documentary, and signed a deal with Netflix. In 2018, she became the first trans woman of color to be hired as a writer on a TV series—Ryan Murphy’s FX series “Pose,” which just concluded its final season.</span></p>
<p><i><span>This story originally aired January 4, 2019</span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Janet Mock first heard the word “māhū,” a Native Hawaiian word for people who exist outside the male-female binary, when she was twelve. She had just moved back to Oahu, where she was born, from Texas, and, by that point, Mock knew that the gender she presented as didn’t feel right. “I don’t like to say the word ‘trapped,’ ” Mock tells The New Yorker’s Hilton Als. “But I was feeling very, very tightly contained in my body.”  Eventually, Mock left Hawaii for New York, where she worked as an editor for People magazine. “[Everyone was] bigger and louder and smarter and bolder than me,” she tells Als. “So, in that sense, I could kind of blend in.” After working at People for five years, she came out publicly as trans; since then, she has emerged as a leading voice on trans issues. She’s written two books, produced a documentary, and signed a deal with Netflix. In 2018, she became the first trans woman of color to be hired as a writer on a TV series—Ryan Murphy’s FX series “Pose,” which just concluded its final season. This story originally aired January 4, 2019</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Masha Gessen on the Battle Over Trans Rights
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/masha-gessen-battle-over-trans-rights-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Many culture-war politicians are attacking the rights of trans people, and making a regressive view of gender as biology the key to their platforms. In this episode, David Remnick talks to two people who’ve found themselves at the center of the battle over transgender rights. In Nebraska, a state senator has committed to filibustering every piece of legislation to ward off a vote on a Republican-sponsored bill that would ban gender-affirming care for trans people under age nineteen. Then Masha Gessen—who fled Russia years ago as an L.G.B.T. person targeted by government repression—explains why anti-trans messaging has been effective for the right, and why discussions of trans issues can be fraught even for those who support them.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c1ccee09-fde5-47dd-8ffc-1f0cbc475d63</guid><enclosure length="47408000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour031023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1307442"/><category>health</category><category>national_news</category><category>nebraska</category><category>news</category><category>politics</category><category>social_justice</category><category>trans_rights</category><category>transgender</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour031023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1307442"/><media:description type="plain">Masha Gessen on the Battle Over Trans Rights
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/03/tnyradiohour_03102023_IMAGE.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>49:23</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Many culture-war politicians are attacking the rights of trans people, and making a regressive view of gender as biology the key to their platforms. In this episode, David Remnick talks to two people who’ve found themselves at the center of the battle over transgender rights. In Nebraska, a state senator has committed to filibustering every piece of legislation to ward off a vote on a Republican-sponsored bill that would ban gender-affirming care for trans people under age nineteen. Then Masha Gessen—who fled Russia years ago as an L.G.B.T. person targeted by government repression—explains why anti-trans messaging has been effective for the right, and why discussions of trans issues can be fraught even for those who support them.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Masha Gessen on the Battle Over Trans Rights</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Many culture-war politicians are attacking the rights of trans people, and making a regressive view of gender as biology the key to their platforms. In this episode, David Remnick talks to two people who’ve found themselves at the center of the battle over transgender rights. In Nebraska, a state senator has committed to filibustering every piece of legislation to ward off a vote on a Republican-sponsored bill that would ban gender-affirming care for trans people under age nineteen. Then Masha Gessen—who fled Russia years ago as an L.G.B.T. person targeted by government repression—explains why anti-trans messaging has been effective for the right, and why discussions of trans issues can be fraught even for those who support them.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Many culture-war politicians are attacking the rights of trans people, and making a regressive view of gender as biology the key to their platforms. In this episode, David Remnick talks to two people who’ve found themselves at the center of the battle over transgender rights. In Nebraska, a state senator has committed to filibustering every piece of legislation to ward off a vote on a Republican-sponsored bill that would ban gender-affirming care for trans people under age nineteen. Then Masha Gessen—who fled Russia years ago as an L.G.B.T. person targeted by government repression—explains why anti-trans messaging has been effective for the right, and why discussions of trans issues can be fraught even for those who support them.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Introducing: “In The Dark”
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/introducing-dark/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;“In The Dark,” the acclaimed investigative podcast from American Public Media, is joining &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; and Condé Nast Entertainment. In its first two seasons, “In The Dark,” hosted by the reporter Madeleine Baran, has taken a close look at the criminal-justice system in America. The first season examined the abduction and murder, in 1989, of eleven-year-old Jacob Wetterling, and exposed devastating failures on the part of law enforcement. The second season focussed on Curtis Flowers, a Black man from Winona, Mississippi, who was tried six times for the same crime. When the show’s reporters began looking into the case, Flowers was on death row. After their reporting, the Supreme Court reversed Flowers’s conviction. Today, he is a free man.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span&gt;A third season of “In The Dark,” which will be the show’s most ambitious one yet, is on its way. David Remnick recently sat down with Baran and the show’s managing producer, Samara Freemark, to talk about the remarkable first two seasons of the show, and what to expect in the future. To listen to the entirety of the “In The Dark” catalogue, subscribe &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://link.chtbl.com/inthedark"&gt;&lt;span&gt;wherever you get your podcasts&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">bba43fc0-e82c-4cee-9c0c-97f0c38c2d44</guid><enclosure length="18048000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour030923_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1306625"/><category>criminal_justice_system</category><category>in_the_dark</category><category>mass_incarceration</category><category>police</category><category>politics</category><category>racism</category><category>social_justice</category><category>storytelling</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour030923_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1306625"/><media:description type="plain">Introducing: “In The Dark”
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/09/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>18:48</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>“In The Dark,” the acclaimed investigative podcast from American Public Media, is joining </span><em><span>The New Yorker</span></em><span> and Condé Nast Entertainment. In its first two seasons, “In The Dark,” hosted by the reporter Madeleine Baran, has taken a close look at the criminal-justice system in America. The first season examined the abduction and murder, in 1989, of eleven-year-old Jacob Wetterling, and exposed devastating failures on the part of law enforcement. The second season focussed on Curtis Flowers, a Black man from Winona, Mississippi, who was tried six times for the same crime. When the show’s reporters began looking into the case, Flowers was on death row. After their reporting, the Supreme Court reversed Flowers’s conviction. Today, he is a free man.</span></p>
<p><span>A third season of “In The Dark,” which will be the show’s most ambitious one yet, is on its way. David Remnick recently sat down with Baran and the show’s managing producer, Samara Freemark, to talk about the remarkable first two seasons of the show, and what to expect in the future. To listen to the entirety of the “In The Dark” catalogue, subscribe<span> </span></span><a href="https://link.chtbl.com/inthedark"><span>wherever you get your podcasts</span></a><span>.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Introducing: “In The Dark”</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>“In The Dark,” the acclaimed investigative podcast from American Public Media, is joining </span><em><span>The New Yorker</span></em><span> and Condé Nast Entertainment. In its first two seasons, “In The Dark,” hosted by the reporter Madeleine Baran, has taken a close look at the criminal-justice system in America. The first season examined the abduction and murder, in 1989, of eleven-year-old Jacob Wetterling, and exposed devastating failures on the part of law enforcement. The second season focussed on Curtis Flowers, a Black man from Winona, Mississippi, who was tried six times for the same crime. When the show’s reporters began looking into the case, Flowers was on death row. After their reporting, the Supreme Court reversed Flowers’s conviction. Today, he is a free man.</span></p>
<p><span>A third season of “In The Dark,” which will be the show’s most ambitious one yet, is on its way. David Remnick recently sat down with Baran and the show’s managing producer, Samara Freemark, to talk about the remarkable first two seasons of the show, and what to expect in the future. To listen to the entirety of the “In The Dark” catalogue, subscribe<span> </span></span><a href="https://link.chtbl.com/inthedark"><span>wherever you get your podcasts</span></a><span>.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>“In The Dark,” the acclaimed investigative podcast from American Public Media, is joining The New Yorker and Condé Nast Entertainment. In its first two seasons, “In The Dark,” hosted by the reporter Madeleine Baran, has taken a close look at the criminal-justice system in America. The first season examined the abduction and murder, in 1989, of eleven-year-old Jacob Wetterling, and exposed devastating failures on the part of law enforcement. The second season focussed on Curtis Flowers, a Black man from Winona, Mississippi, who was tried six times for the same crime. When the show’s reporters began looking into the case, Flowers was on death row. After their reporting, the Supreme Court reversed Flowers’s conviction. Today, he is a free man. A third season of “In The Dark,” which will be the show’s most ambitious one yet, is on its way. David Remnick recently sat down with Baran and the show’s managing producer, Samara Freemark, to talk about the remarkable first two seasons of the show, and what to expect in the future. To listen to the entirety of the “In The Dark” catalogue, subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Chloe Bailey on Working Solo; and the Lost New Jersey Photos of Cartier-Bresson
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/chloe-bailey-working-solo-and-lost-new-jersey-photos-cartier-bresson/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;When they were just thirteen and eleven years old, sisters Chloe and Halle Bailey started posting videos of themselves singing on YouTube and quickly built a following. Their covers often went viral—their version of Beyoncé’s “Pretty Hurts” even caught the attention of Beyoncé, who brought them on tour as her opening act.  Now, with two albums and five Grammy nominations behind them, the sisters are for the first time working on separate projects: Halle is starring as Ariel in an upcoming remake of “The Little Mermaid,” and Chloe is releasing a solo album, “In Pieces,” later this month. Chloe Bailey spoke with the contributing writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/lauren-michele-jackson"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Lauren Michele Jackson&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; at the New Yorker Festival in October about the mixed blessing of social-media stardom. “When we program our minds to think about being No. 1 … it really suffocates you and it stifles the process,” she says. “Right now, I’m just creating to be creating, and I have never felt more free.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, the lost New Jersey photographs of Henri Cartier-Bresson. In 1975, the French master photographer spent a month documenting New Jersey, which he called a “shortcut to America.” Why did the pictures disappear?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2023 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e2386878-dfad-4637-b33b-a917ece81198</guid><enclosure length="23744000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour030723_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1304955"/><category>arts</category><category>music</category><category>new_jersey</category><category>new_yorker_festival</category><category>photography</category><category>pop_music</category><category>producing</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour030723_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1304955"/><media:description type="plain">Chloe Bailey on Working Solo; and the Lost New Jersey Photos of Cartier-Bresson
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/03/ChloeAP23035237600913.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>24:44</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>When they were just thirteen and eleven years old, sisters Chloe and Halle Bailey started posting videos of themselves singing on YouTube and quickly built a following. Their covers often went viral—their version of Beyoncé’s “Pretty Hurts” even caught the attention of Beyoncé, who brought them on tour as her opening act.  Now, with two albums and five Grammy nominations behind them, the sisters are for the first time working on separate projects: Halle is starring as Ariel in an upcoming remake of “The Little Mermaid,” and Chloe is releasing a solo album, “In Pieces,” later this month. Chloe Bailey spoke with the contributing writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/lauren-michele-jackson"><span>Lauren Michele Jackson</span></a><span> at the New Yorker Festival in October about the mixed blessing of social-media stardom. “When we program our minds to think about being No. 1 … it really suffocates you and it stifles the process,” she says. “Right now, I’m just creating to be creating, and I have never felt more free.” </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, the lost New Jersey photographs of Henri Cartier-Bresson. In 1975, the French master photographer spent a month documenting New Jersey, which he called a “shortcut to America.” Why did the pictures disappear?</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Chloe Bailey on Working Solo; and the Lost New Jersey Photos of Cartier-Bresson</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>When they were just thirteen and eleven years old, sisters Chloe and Halle Bailey started posting videos of themselves singing on YouTube and quickly built a following. Their covers often went viral—their version of Beyoncé’s “Pretty Hurts” even caught the attention of Beyoncé, who brought them on tour as her opening act.  Now, with two albums and five Grammy nominations behind them, the sisters are for the first time working on separate projects: Halle is starring as Ariel in an upcoming remake of “The Little Mermaid,” and Chloe is releasing a solo album, “In Pieces,” later this month. Chloe Bailey spoke with the contributing writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/lauren-michele-jackson"><span>Lauren Michele Jackson</span></a><span> at the New Yorker Festival in October about the mixed blessing of social-media stardom. “When we program our minds to think about being No. 1 … it really suffocates you and it stifles the process,” she says. “Right now, I’m just creating to be creating, and I have never felt more free.” </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, the lost New Jersey photographs of Henri Cartier-Bresson. In 1975, the French master photographer spent a month documenting New Jersey, which he called a “shortcut to America.” Why did the pictures disappear?</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>When they were just thirteen and eleven years old, sisters Chloe and Halle Bailey started posting videos of themselves singing on YouTube and quickly built a following. Their covers often went viral—their version of Beyoncé’s “Pretty Hurts” even caught the attention of Beyoncé, who brought them on tour as her opening act.  Now, with two albums and five Grammy nominations behind them, the sisters are for the first time working on separate projects: Halle is starring as Ariel in an upcoming remake of “The Little Mermaid,” and Chloe is releasing a solo album, “In Pieces,” later this month. Chloe Bailey spoke with the contributing writer Lauren Michele Jackson at the New Yorker Festival in October about the mixed blessing of social-media stardom. “When we program our minds to think about being No. 1 … it really suffocates you and it stifles the process,” she says. “Right now, I’m just creating to be creating, and I have never felt more free.”  Plus, the lost New Jersey photographs of Henri Cartier-Bresson. In 1975, the French master photographer spent a month documenting New Jersey, which he called a “shortcut to America.” Why did the pictures disappear?</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Russian Activist Maria Pevchikh on the Fate of Alexey Navalny, and the Future of Russia
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/russian-activist-maria-pevchikh-fate-alexey-navalny-and-future-russia/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Well before launching the horrifying campaign against Ukraine a year ago, Vladimir Putin had been undermining Russia as well: normalizing corruption on a massive scale, and suppressing dissent and democracy.  One of the darkest moments on that trajectory was the poisoning of the opposition leader Alexey Navalny with the nerve agent novichok.  Navalny and a team of investigators had illustrated the corruption of Putin and his circle in startling detail, and Navalny began travelling the country to launch a bid for the Presidency.  “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Every time when I heard Navalny giving an interview, I don’t think there was one interview where he wasn’t asked, ‘How come you’re still alive? How come they still haven’t they killed you?,’ ” recalls &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;the Russian activist Maria Pevchikh, the head of investigations and media for Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;. “And Navalny is rolling his eyes saying, ‘I don’t know, I’m tired of this question, stop asking. I don’t know why I’m still alive and why they haven’t tried to assassinate me.’ ”  Pevchikh was travelling with Navalny when he was poisoned, and&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; helped uncover the involvement of the F.S.B. security services.  After surviving the assassination and recuperating abroad, Navalny returned to Russia only to be arrested and then detained in a penal colony. “I think Putin wants him to suffer a lot and then die in prison,” Pevchikh tells David Remnick. Still, she maintains hope. “The situation is so chaotic, specifically because of the war,” she says. “Is the likelihood of Navalny being released when the war ends high? I think it is almost certain.” Pevchikh also served as an executive producer of the documentary “Navalny,” which is nominated for an Academy Award.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ec539a34-802d-4f3f-9803-3182dff88202</guid><enclosure length="25152000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour030323_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1304953"/><category>news</category><category>politics</category><category>putin</category><category>russia</category><category>social_justice</category><category>ukraine</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour030323_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1304953"/><media:description type="plain">The Russian Activist Maria Pevchikh on the Fate of Alexey Navalny, and the Future of Russia
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/03/tnyradiohour_03032023_IMAGE.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>26:12</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Well before launching the horrifying campaign against Ukraine a year ago, Vladimir Putin had been undermining Russia as well: normalizing corruption on a massive scale, and suppressing dissent and democracy.  One of the darkest moments on that trajectory was the poisoning of the opposition leader Alexey Navalny with the nerve agent novichok.  Navalny and a team of investigators had illustrated the corruption of Putin and his circle in startling detail, and Navalny began travelling the country to launch a bid for the Presidency.  “</span><span>Every time when I heard Navalny giving an interview, I don’t think there was one interview where he wasn’t asked, ‘How come you’re still alive? How come they still haven’t they killed you?,’ ” recalls </span><span>the Russian activist Maria Pevchikh, the head of investigations and media for Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation</span><span>. “And Navalny is rolling his eyes saying, ‘I don’t know, I’m tired of this question, stop asking. I don’t know why I’m still alive and why they haven’t tried to assassinate me.’ ”  Pevchikh was travelling with Navalny when he was poisoned, and</span><span> helped uncover the involvement of the F.S.B. security services.  After surviving the assassination and recuperating abroad, Navalny returned to Russia only to be arrested and then detained in a penal colony. “I think Putin wants him to suffer a lot and then die in prison,” Pevchikh tells David Remnick. Still, she maintains hope. “The situation is so chaotic, specifically because of the war,” she says. “Is the likelihood of Navalny being released when the war ends high? I think it is almost certain.” Pevchikh also served as an executive producer of the documentary “Navalny,” which is nominated for an Academy Award.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Russian Activist Maria Pevchikh on the Fate of Alexey Navalny, and the Future of Russia</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Well before launching the horrifying campaign against Ukraine a year ago, Vladimir Putin had been undermining Russia as well: normalizing corruption on a massive scale, and suppressing dissent and democracy.  One of the darkest moments on that trajectory was the poisoning of the opposition leader Alexey Navalny with the nerve agent novichok.  Navalny and a team of investigators had illustrated the corruption of Putin and his circle in startling detail, and Navalny began travelling the country to launch a bid for the Presidency.  “</span><span>Every time when I heard Navalny giving an interview, I don’t think there was one interview where he wasn’t asked, ‘How come you’re still alive? How come they still haven’t they killed you?,’ ” recalls </span><span>the Russian activist Maria Pevchikh, the head of investigations and media for Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation</span><span>. “And Navalny is rolling his eyes saying, ‘I don’t know, I’m tired of this question, stop asking. I don’t know why I’m still alive and why they haven’t tried to assassinate me.’ ”  Pevchikh was travelling with Navalny when he was poisoned, and</span><span> helped uncover the involvement of the F.S.B. security services.  After surviving the assassination and recuperating abroad, Navalny returned to Russia only to be arrested and then detained in a penal colony. “I think Putin wants him to suffer a lot and then die in prison,” Pevchikh tells David Remnick. Still, she maintains hope. “The situation is so chaotic, specifically because of the war,” she says. “Is the likelihood of Navalny being released when the war ends high? I think it is almost certain.” Pevchikh also served as an executive producer of the documentary “Navalny,” which is nominated for an Academy Award.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Well before launching the horrifying campaign against Ukraine a year ago, Vladimir Putin had been undermining Russia as well: normalizing corruption on a massive scale, and suppressing dissent and democracy.  One of the darkest moments on that trajectory was the poisoning of the opposition leader Alexey Navalny with the nerve agent novichok.  Navalny and a team of investigators had illustrated the corruption of Putin and his circle in startling detail, and Navalny began travelling the country to launch a bid for the Presidency.  “Every time when I heard Navalny giving an interview, I don’t think there was one interview where he wasn’t asked, ‘How come you’re still alive? How come they still haven’t they killed you?,’ ” recalls the Russian activist Maria Pevchikh, the head of investigations and media for Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation. “And Navalny is rolling his eyes saying, ‘I don’t know, I’m tired of this question, stop asking. I don’t know why I’m still alive and why they haven’t tried to assassinate me.’ ”  Pevchikh was travelling with Navalny when he was poisoned, and helped uncover the involvement of the F.S.B. security services.  After surviving the assassination and recuperating abroad, Navalny returned to Russia only to be arrested and then detained in a penal colony. “I think Putin wants him to suffer a lot and then die in prison,” Pevchikh tells David Remnick. Still, she maintains hope. “The situation is so chaotic, specifically because of the war,” she says. “Is the likelihood of Navalny being released when the war ends high? I think it is almost certain.” Pevchikh also served as an executive producer of the documentary “Navalny,” which is nominated for an Academy Award.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Stephanie Hsu on “Everything Everywhere All at Once”; and the 2023 Brody Awards
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/stephanie-hsu-everything-everywhere-all-once-and-2023-brody-awards/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;“Everything Everywhere All at Once” is in a genre all its own, and is an extremely unlikely favorite for the Academy Award for Best Picture. It’s a loopy sci-fi quest that becomes a martial arts revenge battle, superimposed on a sentimental family drama. Stephanie Hsu plays both Joy, a depressed young woman struggling with her immigrant mother (played by Michelle Yeoh), and Jobu Tupaki, an interdimensional supervillain bent on sowing chaos, and possibly the end of the world.  “The relationship between Evelyn and Joy in its simplest terms is very fraught,” Hsu tells the staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jia-tolentino"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jia Tolentino&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. “It’s the story of a relationship of a daughter who’s a lesbian who is deeply longing for her mother’s acceptance . . . but they keep chasing each other around in the universe and they can just never find one another. Until, of course, they launch into the multiverse and become nemeses.” The film is nominated for eleven Academy Awards, including Best Supporting Actress, for Hsu’s performance. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, in a New Yorker Radio Hour annual tradition, the incorruptible film critic Richard Brody bequeaths the awards that really matter: the Brody Awards, recognizing the finest performances and the best picture of 2022. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d31dafe5-25be-484f-a7fa-a1c767eb31db</guid><enclosure length="30640000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour022823_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1302634"/><category>academy_awards</category><category>arts</category><category>everything_everywhere_all_at_once</category><category>film</category><category>movies</category><category>oscars</category><category>science_fiction</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour022823_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1302634"/><media:description type="plain">Stephanie Hsu on “Everything Everywhere All at Once”; and the 2023 Brody Awards
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/02/StephanieHsu_AP23044733036653.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>31:55</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>“Everything Everywhere All at Once” is in a genre all its own, and is an extremely unlikely favorite for the Academy Award for Best Picture. It’s a loopy sci-fi quest that becomes a martial arts revenge battle, superimposed on a sentimental family drama. Stephanie Hsu plays both Joy, a depressed young woman struggling with her immigrant mother (played by Michelle Yeoh), and Jobu Tupaki, an interdimensional supervillain bent on sowing chaos, and possibly the end of the world.  “The relationship between Evelyn and Joy in its simplest terms is very fraught,” Hsu tells the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jia-tolentino"><span>Jia Tolentino</span></a><span>. “It’s the story of a relationship of a daughter who’s a lesbian who is deeply longing for her mother’s acceptance . . . but they keep chasing each other around in the universe and they can just never find one another. Until, of course, they launch into the multiverse and become nemeses.” The film is nominated for eleven Academy Awards, including Best Supporting Actress, for Hsu’s performance. </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, in a New Yorker Radio Hour annual tradition, the incorruptible film critic Richard Brody bequeaths the awards that really matter: the Brody Awards, recognizing the finest performances and the best picture of 2022. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Stephanie Hsu on “Everything Everywhere All at Once”; and the 2023 Brody Awards</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>“Everything Everywhere All at Once” is in a genre all its own, and is an extremely unlikely favorite for the Academy Award for Best Picture. It’s a loopy sci-fi quest that becomes a martial arts revenge battle, superimposed on a sentimental family drama. Stephanie Hsu plays both Joy, a depressed young woman struggling with her immigrant mother (played by Michelle Yeoh), and Jobu Tupaki, an interdimensional supervillain bent on sowing chaos, and possibly the end of the world.  “The relationship between Evelyn and Joy in its simplest terms is very fraught,” Hsu tells the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jia-tolentino"><span>Jia Tolentino</span></a><span>. “It’s the story of a relationship of a daughter who’s a lesbian who is deeply longing for her mother’s acceptance . . . but they keep chasing each other around in the universe and they can just never find one another. Until, of course, they launch into the multiverse and become nemeses.” The film is nominated for eleven Academy Awards, including Best Supporting Actress, for Hsu’s performance. </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, in a New Yorker Radio Hour annual tradition, the incorruptible film critic Richard Brody bequeaths the awards that really matter: the Brody Awards, recognizing the finest performances and the best picture of 2022. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>“Everything Everywhere All at Once” is in a genre all its own, and is an extremely unlikely favorite for the Academy Award for Best Picture. It’s a loopy sci-fi quest that becomes a martial arts revenge battle, superimposed on a sentimental family drama. Stephanie Hsu plays both Joy, a depressed young woman struggling with her immigrant mother (played by Michelle Yeoh), and Jobu Tupaki, an interdimensional supervillain bent on sowing chaos, and possibly the end of the world.  “The relationship between Evelyn and Joy in its simplest terms is very fraught,” Hsu tells the staff writer Jia Tolentino. “It’s the story of a relationship of a daughter who’s a lesbian who is deeply longing for her mother’s acceptance . . . but they keep chasing each other around in the universe and they can just never find one another. Until, of course, they launch into the multiverse and become nemeses.” The film is nominated for eleven Academy Awards, including Best Supporting Actress, for Hsu’s performance.  Plus, in a New Yorker Radio Hour annual tradition, the incorruptible film critic Richard Brody bequeaths the awards that really matter: the Brody Awards, recognizing the finest performances and the best picture of 2022.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Pandemic at Three: Who Got it Right?
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/pandemic-three-who-got-it-right-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;As the COVID-19 pandemic approaches its fourth year, we can begin to gain some clarity on which countries, and which U.S. states, had the best outcomes over time. In a conversation with David Remnick, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/dhruv-khullar"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Dhruv Khullar&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, a contributing writer and a practicing physician in New York, explains some of the key factors. Robust testing was key for public-health authorities to make good decisions, unsurprisingly. What also seems clear from a distance, Khullar says, is that social cohesion was a decisive underlying condition. This helps explain why the United States did poorly in its pandemic response, despite a technologically advanced health-care system. Peer pressure, in other words, trumped mandates. Khullar also speaks to Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about how misinformation and political polarization inhibit our country’s efforts on public health.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0c692ae1-5bae-4ccf-a81c-ec32ffb44ea6</guid><enclosure length="18320000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour022423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1302625"/><category>cdc</category><category>coronavirus</category><category>covid_19</category><category>health</category><category>national_news</category><category>news</category><category>politics</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour022423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1302625"/><media:description type="plain">The Pandemic at Three: Who Got it Right?
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/02/tnyradiohour_20230224_IMAGE.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>19:05</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>As the COVID-19 pandemic approaches its fourth year, we can begin to gain some clarity on which countries, and which U.S. states, had the best outcomes over time. In a conversation with David Remnick, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/dhruv-khullar"><span>Dhruv Khullar</span></a><span>, a contributing writer and a practicing physician in New York, explains some of the key factors. Robust testing was key for public-health authorities to make good decisions, unsurprisingly. What also seems clear from a distance, Khullar says, is that social cohesion was a decisive underlying condition. This helps explain why the United States did poorly in its pandemic response, despite a technologically advanced health-care system. Peer pressure, in other words, trumped mandates. Khullar also speaks to Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about how misinformation and political polarization inhibit our country’s efforts on public health.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Pandemic at Three: Who Got it Right?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>As the COVID-19 pandemic approaches its fourth year, we can begin to gain some clarity on which countries, and which U.S. states, had the best outcomes over time. In a conversation with David Remnick, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/dhruv-khullar"><span>Dhruv Khullar</span></a><span>, a contributing writer and a practicing physician in New York, explains some of the key factors. Robust testing was key for public-health authorities to make good decisions, unsurprisingly. What also seems clear from a distance, Khullar says, is that social cohesion was a decisive underlying condition. This helps explain why the United States did poorly in its pandemic response, despite a technologically advanced health-care system. Peer pressure, in other words, trumped mandates. Khullar also speaks to Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about how misinformation and political polarization inhibit our country’s efforts on public health.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>As the COVID-19 pandemic approaches its fourth year, we can begin to gain some clarity on which countries, and which U.S. states, had the best outcomes over time. In a conversation with David Remnick, Dhruv Khullar, a contributing writer and a practicing physician in New York, explains some of the key factors. Robust testing was key for public-health authorities to make good decisions, unsurprisingly. What also seems clear from a distance, Khullar says, is that social cohesion was a decisive underlying condition. This helps explain why the United States did poorly in its pandemic response, despite a technologically advanced health-care system. Peer pressure, in other words, trumped mandates. Khullar also speaks to Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about how misinformation and political polarization inhibit our country’s efforts on public health.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Angela Bassett on Playing Tina Turner and Queen Ramonda of Wakanda
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/angela-bassett-playing-tina-turner-and-queen-ramonda-wakanda/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;It’s been almost three decades since Angela Bassett emerged in Hollywood as a “totem of empowered Black womanhood,” as &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/the-undeniable-royalty-of-angela-bassett"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Michael Schulman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; puts it—known for groundbreaking roles in films like “What’s Love Got to Do with It” and “How Stella Got Her Groove Back.” Now, at sixty-four, Bassett is nominated for an Oscar for her performance in “Black Panther: Wakanda Forever.” As the fierce, grieving Queen Ramonda, she is the first actor nominated for any Marvel movie. Bassett speaks with Schulman about her preparation for the film, and reflects on how a poetry recitation drove her to acting as a young person. “It was the first recognition for me, at fifteen, that drama, that theatre, that words, that &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;passion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; from one human being could move another,” she says. “And that maybe I had a gift for it.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">997e7843-3d06-4502-bc77-be51ca5a1add</guid><enclosure length="19616000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour022123_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1300266"/><category>angela_bassett</category><category>arts</category><category>black_panther</category><category>marvel</category><category>movies</category><category>oscars</category><category>tina_turner</category><category>wakanda</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour022123_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1300266"/><media:description type="plain">Angela Bassett on Playing Tina Turner and Queen Ramonda of Wakanda
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/02/Bassett_DAndreMichael.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>20:26</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>It’s been almost three decades since Angela Bassett emerged in Hollywood as a “totem of empowered Black womanhood,” as </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/the-undeniable-royalty-of-angela-bassett"><span>Michael Schulman</span></a><span> puts it—known for groundbreaking roles in films like “What’s Love Got to Do with It” and “How Stella Got Her Groove Back.” Now, at sixty-four, Bassett is nominated for an Oscar for her performance in “Black Panther: Wakanda Forever.” As the fierce, grieving Queen Ramonda, she is the first actor nominated for any Marvel movie. Bassett speaks with Schulman about her preparation for the film, and reflects on how a poetry recitation drove her to acting as a young person. “It was the first recognition for me, at fifteen, that drama, that theatre, that words, that </span><i><span>passion</span></i><span> from one human being could move another,” she says. “And that maybe I had a gift for it.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Angela Bassett on Playing Tina Turner and Queen Ramonda of Wakanda</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>It’s been almost three decades since Angela Bassett emerged in Hollywood as a “totem of empowered Black womanhood,” as </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/the-undeniable-royalty-of-angela-bassett"><span>Michael Schulman</span></a><span> puts it—known for groundbreaking roles in films like “What’s Love Got to Do with It” and “How Stella Got Her Groove Back.” Now, at sixty-four, Bassett is nominated for an Oscar for her performance in “Black Panther: Wakanda Forever.” As the fierce, grieving Queen Ramonda, she is the first actor nominated for any Marvel movie. Bassett speaks with Schulman about her preparation for the film, and reflects on how a poetry recitation drove her to acting as a young person. “It was the first recognition for me, at fifteen, that drama, that theatre, that words, that </span><i><span>passion</span></i><span> from one human being could move another,” she says. “And that maybe I had a gift for it.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>It’s been almost three decades since Angela Bassett emerged in Hollywood as a “totem of empowered Black womanhood,” as Michael Schulman puts it—known for groundbreaking roles in films like “What’s Love Got to Do with It” and “How Stella Got Her Groove Back.” Now, at sixty-four, Bassett is nominated for an Oscar for her performance in “Black Panther: Wakanda Forever.” As the fierce, grieving Queen Ramonda, she is the first actor nominated for any Marvel movie. Bassett speaks with Schulman about her preparation for the film, and reflects on how a poetry recitation drove her to acting as a young person. “It was the first recognition for me, at fifteen, that drama, that theatre, that words, that passion from one human being could move another,” she says. “And that maybe I had a gift for it.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>A Year of the War in Ukraine
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/year-war-ukraine/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In the year since Russia’s invasion, Ukrainians have shown incredible fortitude on the battlefield. Yet an end to the conflict seems nowhere in sight. “Putin’s strategy could be defined as ‘I can’t have it—nobody can have it.’ And, sadly, that’s where the tragedy is right now,” Stephen Kotkin, a fellow at the Hoover Institution and a scholar of Russian history, tells David Remnick. “Ukraine is winning in the sense that [it] didn’t allow Russia to take that whole country. But it’s losing in the sense that its country is being destroyed.” Kotkin says that the standards for a victory laid out by President Volodymyr Zelensky set an impossibly high bar, and that Ukraine—however distasteful the prospect—may be forced to cut its losses. He suggests it could accept its loss of control over some of its territory while aiming to secure expedited accession to the European Union, and still consider this a victory.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Remnick also speaks with Sevgil Musaieva, the thirty-five-year-old editor-in-chief of Ukrainska Pravda, an online publication based in Kyiv, about the toll that the war is taking on her and her peers. “We have to destroy the Soviet Empire and the ghosts of the Soviet Empire, and this is the goal of our generation,” Musaieva says. “People of my generation, they don’t have family. They don’t have kids. They just dedicate their lives—the best years of their lives—to country.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Kotkin says that the standards for a victory laid out by President Volodymyr Zelensky set an impossibly high bar, and that Ukraine—however distasteful the prospect—may be forced to cut its losses. He suggests it might need to accept its loss of control over some of its territory while aiming to secure expedited accession to the European Union, and still consider this a victory.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fa0b0b80-a9d2-4e60-a27f-34a16059063d</guid><enclosure length="29136000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour021723_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1300064"/><category>history</category><category>kyiv</category><category>news</category><category>politics</category><category>putin_war</category><category>russia</category><category>social_justice</category><category>ukraine</category><category>ukraine_war</category><category>war</category><category>zelensky</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour021723_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1300064"/><media:description type="plain">A Year of the War in Ukraine
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/02/tnyradiohour_021623Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>30:21</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>In the year since Russia’s invasion, Ukrainians have shown incredible fortitude on the battlefield. Yet an end to the conflict seems nowhere in sight. “Putin’s strategy could be defined as ‘I can’t have it—nobody can have it.’ And, sadly, that’s where the tragedy is right now,” Stephen Kotkin, a fellow at the Hoover Institution and a scholar of Russian history, tells David Remnick. “Ukraine is winning in the sense that [it] didn’t allow Russia to take that whole country. But it’s losing in the sense that its country is being destroyed.” Kotkin says that the standards for a victory laid out by President Volodymyr Zelensky set an impossibly high bar, and that Ukraine—however distasteful the prospect—may be forced to cut its losses. He suggests it could accept its loss of control over some of its territory while aiming to secure expedited accession to the European Union, and still consider this a victory.</span></p>
<p><span>Remnick also speaks with Sevgil Musaieva, the thirty-five-year-old editor-in-chief of Ukrainska Pravda, an online publication based in Kyiv, about the toll that the war is taking on her and her peers. “We have to destroy the Soviet Empire and the ghosts of the Soviet Empire, and this is the goal of our generation,” Musaieva says. “People of my generation, they don’t have family. They don’t have kids. They just dedicate their lives—the best years of their lives—to country.”</span></p>
<p><span>Kotkin says that the standards for a victory laid out by President Volodymyr Zelensky set an impossibly high bar, and that Ukraine—however distasteful the prospect—may be forced to cut its losses. He suggests it might need to accept its loss of control over some of its territory while aiming to secure expedited accession to the European Union, and still consider this a victory.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>A Year of the War in Ukraine</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>In the year since Russia’s invasion, Ukrainians have shown incredible fortitude on the battlefield. Yet an end to the conflict seems nowhere in sight. “Putin’s strategy could be defined as ‘I can’t have it—nobody can have it.’ And, sadly, that’s where the tragedy is right now,” Stephen Kotkin, a fellow at the Hoover Institution and a scholar of Russian history, tells David Remnick. “Ukraine is winning in the sense that [it] didn’t allow Russia to take that whole country. But it’s losing in the sense that its country is being destroyed.” Kotkin says that the standards for a victory laid out by President Volodymyr Zelensky set an impossibly high bar, and that Ukraine—however distasteful the prospect—may be forced to cut its losses. He suggests it could accept its loss of control over some of its territory while aiming to secure expedited accession to the European Union, and still consider this a victory.</span></p>
<p><span>Remnick also speaks with Sevgil Musaieva, the thirty-five-year-old editor-in-chief of Ukrainska Pravda, an online publication based in Kyiv, about the toll that the war is taking on her and her peers. “We have to destroy the Soviet Empire and the ghosts of the Soviet Empire, and this is the goal of our generation,” Musaieva says. “People of my generation, they don’t have family. They don’t have kids. They just dedicate their lives—the best years of their lives—to country.”</span></p>
<p><span>Kotkin says that the standards for a victory laid out by President Volodymyr Zelensky set an impossibly high bar, and that Ukraine—however distasteful the prospect—may be forced to cut its losses. He suggests it might need to accept its loss of control over some of its territory while aiming to secure expedited accession to the European Union, and still consider this a victory.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>In the year since Russia’s invasion, Ukrainians have shown incredible fortitude on the battlefield. Yet an end to the conflict seems nowhere in sight. “Putin’s strategy could be defined as ‘I can’t have it—nobody can have it.’ And, sadly, that’s where the tragedy is right now,” Stephen Kotkin, a fellow at the Hoover Institution and a scholar of Russian history, tells David Remnick. “Ukraine is winning in the sense that [it] didn’t allow Russia to take that whole country. But it’s losing in the sense that its country is being destroyed.” Kotkin says that the standards for a victory laid out by President Volodymyr Zelensky set an impossibly high bar, and that Ukraine—however distasteful the prospect—may be forced to cut its losses. He suggests it could accept its loss of control over some of its territory while aiming to secure expedited accession to the European Union, and still consider this a victory. Remnick also speaks with Sevgil Musaieva, the thirty-five-year-old editor-in-chief of Ukrainska Pravda, an online publication based in Kyiv, about the toll that the war is taking on her and her peers. “We have to destroy the Soviet Empire and the ghosts of the Soviet Empire, and this is the goal of our generation,” Musaieva says. “People of my generation, they don’t have family. They don’t have kids. They just dedicate their lives—the best years of their lives—to country.” Kotkin says that the standards for a victory laid out by President Volodymyr Zelensky set an impossibly high bar, and that Ukraine—however distasteful the prospect—may be forced to cut its losses. He suggests it might need to accept its loss of control over some of its territory while aiming to secure expedited accession to the European Union, and still consider this a victory.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Martin McDonagh Talks with Patrick Radden Keefe
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/martin-mcdonagh-talks-patrick-radden-keefe/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Martin McDonagh burst onto the London theatre scene as a young playwright in the nineteen-nineties. At one point, he had four plays running simultaneously on stages across London. But McDonagh also aspired to work in movies, and he eventually shifted his focus to directing films such as “In Bruges” and “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.” “When you sit down to write something, how do you know if it’s a movie or a play?” the staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/patrick-radden-keefe"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Patrick Radden Keefe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; asked McDonagh at The New Yorker Festival. “If it has four characters, and it’s set indoors, it’s a play,” McDonagh replied—“if it doesn’t have any donkeys or dogs.” McDonagh’s new film, “The Banshees of Inisherin,” starring Colin Farrell and Brendan Gleeson, is his first feature set in Ireland, and it prominently features a donkey. “Banshees” traces the story of a friendship breaking apart in the beautiful, remote hills of the country’s west. “I just wanted this [movie] to be sort of plotless in a way,” McDonagh said. “Just to have the unravelling of this breakup be what the whole story was about.” The film is now nominated for nine Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Director. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment originally aired on October 21, 2022. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f6c7460e-c7fe-4917-ab33-f82bf6a06365</guid><enclosure length="14240000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour021423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1296117"/><category>academy_awards</category><category>arts</category><category>film</category><category>interview</category><category>martin_mcdonagh</category><category>oscars</category><category>storytelling</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour021423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1296117"/><media:description type="plain">Martin McDonagh Talks with Patrick Radden Keefe
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/02/McDonaugh_AP.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>14:50</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Martin McDonagh burst onto the London theatre scene as a young playwright in the nineteen-nineties. At one point, he had four plays running simultaneously on stages across London. But McDonagh also aspired to work in movies, and he eventually shifted his focus to directing films such as “In Bruges” and “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.” “When you sit down to write something, how do you know if it’s a movie or a play?” the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/patrick-radden-keefe"><span>Patrick Radden Keefe</span></a><span> asked McDonagh at The New Yorker Festival. “If it has four characters, and it’s set indoors, it’s a play,” McDonagh replied—“if it doesn’t have any donkeys or dogs.” McDonagh’s new film, “The Banshees of Inisherin,” starring Colin Farrell and Brendan Gleeson, is his first feature set in Ireland, and it prominently features a donkey. “Banshees” traces the story of a friendship breaking apart in the beautiful, remote hills of the country’s west. “I just wanted this [movie] to be sort of plotless in a way,” McDonagh said. “Just to have the unravelling of this breakup be what the whole story was about.” The film is now nominated for nine Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Director. </span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired on October 21, 2022. </span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Martin McDonagh Talks with Patrick Radden Keefe</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Martin McDonagh burst onto the London theatre scene as a young playwright in the nineteen-nineties. At one point, he had four plays running simultaneously on stages across London. But McDonagh also aspired to work in movies, and he eventually shifted his focus to directing films such as “In Bruges” and “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.” “When you sit down to write something, how do you know if it’s a movie or a play?” the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/patrick-radden-keefe"><span>Patrick Radden Keefe</span></a><span> asked McDonagh at The New Yorker Festival. “If it has four characters, and it’s set indoors, it’s a play,” McDonagh replied—“if it doesn’t have any donkeys or dogs.” McDonagh’s new film, “The Banshees of Inisherin,” starring Colin Farrell and Brendan Gleeson, is his first feature set in Ireland, and it prominently features a donkey. “Banshees” traces the story of a friendship breaking apart in the beautiful, remote hills of the country’s west. “I just wanted this [movie] to be sort of plotless in a way,” McDonagh said. “Just to have the unravelling of this breakup be what the whole story was about.” The film is now nominated for nine Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Director. </span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired on October 21, 2022. </span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Martin McDonagh burst onto the London theatre scene as a young playwright in the nineteen-nineties. At one point, he had four plays running simultaneously on stages across London. But McDonagh also aspired to work in movies, and he eventually shifted his focus to directing films such as “In Bruges” and “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.” “When you sit down to write something, how do you know if it’s a movie or a play?” the staff writer Patrick Radden Keefe asked McDonagh at The New Yorker Festival. “If it has four characters, and it’s set indoors, it’s a play,” McDonagh replied—“if it doesn’t have any donkeys or dogs.” McDonagh’s new film, “The Banshees of Inisherin,” starring Colin Farrell and Brendan Gleeson, is his first feature set in Ireland, and it prominently features a donkey. “Banshees” traces the story of a friendship breaking apart in the beautiful, remote hills of the country’s west. “I just wanted this [movie] to be sort of plotless in a way,” McDonagh said. “Just to have the unravelling of this breakup be what the whole story was about.” The film is now nominated for nine Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Director.  This segment originally aired on October 21, 2022.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Chuck D on How Hip-Hop Changed the World
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/chuck-d-how-hip-hop-changed-world-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Forty years ago, Chuck D showed listeners how exciting, radical, and unpredictable hip-hop could be. His song “Fight the Power” became a protest anthem for a generation, and a Greek chorus in Spike Lee’s film “Do the Right Thing.” The Public Enemy front man talks with the staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/kelefa-sanneh"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Kelefa Sanneh&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; about his life in music. “I wanted to curate, present, navigate, teach, and lead the hip-hop art, making it something that people would revere,” he says. Now, at sixty-two, Chuck D is an elder statesman of his genre, and also a critic of it and some of its more commercial impulses. His latest project is a four-part documentary, “Fight the Power: How Hip-Hop Changed the World,” which is airing now on PBS. “I’ve been to one hundred sixteen countries over thirty-eight years, so I’ve seen the changes,” he says. “People have made their way to me to say, ‘Chuck, this is what this art form has meant to me,’ in all continents except for Antarctica.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, Alex Barasch, who &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/01/02/can-the-last-of-us-break-the-curse-of-bad-video-game-adaptations"&gt;&lt;span&gt;wrote about&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; “The Last of Us,” joins David Remnick to talk about why adapting video games to film and television has been so challenging: for every “Tomb Raider,” there are dozens of forgotten shows and flops. “The Last of Us” has been years in the making, but it’s paid off for HBO, winning both critical and commercial success.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4badfda3-8a67-4095-bbec-326753a6aaa5</guid><enclosure length="28048000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour021023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1296104"/><category>arts</category><category>chuck_d</category><category>hip_hop</category><category>music</category><category>politics</category><category>public_enemy</category><category>rap</category><category>social_justice</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour021023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1296104"/><media:description type="plain">Chuck D on How Hip-Hop Changed the World
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/02/Chuck_D.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>29:13</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Forty years ago, Chuck D showed listeners how exciting, radical, and unpredictable hip-hop could be. His song “Fight the Power” became a protest anthem for a generation, and a Greek chorus in Spike Lee’s film “Do the Right Thing.” The Public Enemy front man talks with the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/kelefa-sanneh"><span>Kelefa Sanneh</span></a><span> about his life in music. “I wanted to curate, present, navigate, teach, and lead the hip-hop art, making it something that people would revere,” he says. Now, at sixty-two, Chuck D is an elder statesman of his genre, and also a critic of it and some of its more commercial impulses. His latest project is a four-part documentary, “Fight the Power: How Hip-Hop Changed the World,” which is airing now on PBS. “I’ve been to one hundred sixteen countries over thirty-eight years, so I’ve seen the changes,” he says. “People have made their way to me to say, ‘Chuck, this is what this art form has meant to me,’ in all continents except for Antarctica.” </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, Alex Barasch, who </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/01/02/can-the-last-of-us-break-the-curse-of-bad-video-game-adaptations"><span>wrote about</span></a><span> “The Last of Us,” joins David Remnick to talk about why adapting video games to film and television has been so challenging: for every “Tomb Raider,” there are dozens of forgotten shows and flops. “The Last of Us” has been years in the making, but it’s paid off for HBO, winning both critical and commercial success.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Chuck D on How Hip-Hop Changed the World</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Forty years ago, Chuck D showed listeners how exciting, radical, and unpredictable hip-hop could be. His song “Fight the Power” became a protest anthem for a generation, and a Greek chorus in Spike Lee’s film “Do the Right Thing.” The Public Enemy front man talks with the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/kelefa-sanneh"><span>Kelefa Sanneh</span></a><span> about his life in music. “I wanted to curate, present, navigate, teach, and lead the hip-hop art, making it something that people would revere,” he says. Now, at sixty-two, Chuck D is an elder statesman of his genre, and also a critic of it and some of its more commercial impulses. His latest project is a four-part documentary, “Fight the Power: How Hip-Hop Changed the World,” which is airing now on PBS. “I’ve been to one hundred sixteen countries over thirty-eight years, so I’ve seen the changes,” he says. “People have made their way to me to say, ‘Chuck, this is what this art form has meant to me,’ in all continents except for Antarctica.” </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, Alex Barasch, who </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/01/02/can-the-last-of-us-break-the-curse-of-bad-video-game-adaptations"><span>wrote about</span></a><span> “The Last of Us,” joins David Remnick to talk about why adapting video games to film and television has been so challenging: for every “Tomb Raider,” there are dozens of forgotten shows and flops. “The Last of Us” has been years in the making, but it’s paid off for HBO, winning both critical and commercial success.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Forty years ago, Chuck D showed listeners how exciting, radical, and unpredictable hip-hop could be. His song “Fight the Power” became a protest anthem for a generation, and a Greek chorus in Spike Lee’s film “Do the Right Thing.” The Public Enemy front man talks with the staff writer Kelefa Sanneh about his life in music. “I wanted to curate, present, navigate, teach, and lead the hip-hop art, making it something that people would revere,” he says. Now, at sixty-two, Chuck D is an elder statesman of his genre, and also a critic of it and some of its more commercial impulses. His latest project is a four-part documentary, “Fight the Power: How Hip-Hop Changed the World,” which is airing now on PBS. “I’ve been to one hundred sixteen countries over thirty-eight years, so I’ve seen the changes,” he says. “People have made their way to me to say, ‘Chuck, this is what this art form has meant to me,’ in all continents except for Antarctica.”  Plus, Alex Barasch, who wrote about “The Last of Us,” joins David Remnick to talk about why adapting video games to film and television has been so challenging: for every “Tomb Raider,” there are dozens of forgotten shows and flops. “The Last of Us” has been years in the making, but it’s paid off for HBO, winning both critical and commercial success.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Salman Rushdie on Surviving the Fatwa
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/salman-rushdie-surviving-fatwa-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Thirty-four years ago, the Ayatollah Khomeini, the Supreme Leader of Iran, issued a fatwa calling for the assassination of the novelist Salman Rushdie, whose book “The Satanic Verses” Khomeini declared blasphemous. It caused a worldwide uproar. Rushdie lived in hiding in London for a decade before moving to New York, where he began to let his guard down. “I had come to feel that it was a very long time ago and, and that the world moves on,” he tells David Remnick. “That’s what I had agreed with myself was the case. And then it wasn’t.” In August of last year, a man named Hadi Matar attacked Rushdie onstage before a public event, stabbing him about a dozen times. Rushdie barely survived. Now, in his first interview since the assassination attempt, Rushdie discusses the long shadow of the fatwa; his recovery from extensive injuries; and his writing. It was “just a piece of fortune, given what happened,” that Rushdie had finished work on a new novel, “Victory City,” weeks before the attack. The book is being published this week. “I’ve always thought that my books are more interesting than my life,” he remarks. “Unfortunately, the world appears to disagree.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;David Remnick’s Profile of Rushdie appears in the February 13th &amp;amp; 20th issue of The New Yorker.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a1879668-d403-42a8-b06b-d0bc43f7e9d4</guid><enclosure length="48416000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour020623_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1296114"/><category>arts</category><category>books</category><category>history</category><category>india</category><category>literature</category><category>novel</category><category>politics</category><category>salman_rushdie</category><category>storytelling</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour020623_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1296114"/><media:description type="plain">Salman Rushdie on Surviving the Fatwa
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/02/NYRH_021023_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>50:26</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Thirty-four years ago, the Ayatollah Khomeini, the Supreme Leader of Iran, issued a fatwa calling for the assassination of the novelist Salman Rushdie, whose book “The Satanic Verses” Khomeini declared blasphemous. It caused a worldwide uproar. Rushdie lived in hiding in London for a decade before moving to New York, where he began to let his guard down. “I had come to feel that it was a very long time ago and, and that the world moves on,” he tells David Remnick. “That’s what I had agreed with myself was the case. And then it wasn’t.” In August of last year, a man named Hadi Matar attacked Rushdie onstage before a public event, stabbing him about a dozen times. Rushdie barely survived. Now, in his first interview since the assassination attempt, Rushdie discusses the long shadow of the fatwa; his recovery from extensive injuries; and his writing. It was “just a piece of fortune, given what happened,” that Rushdie had finished work on a new novel, “Victory City,” weeks before the attack. The book is being published this week. “I’ve always thought that my books are more interesting than my life,” he remarks. “Unfortunately, the world appears to disagree.” </span></p>
<p><em><span>David Remnick’s Profile of Rushdie appears in the February 13th &amp; 20th issue of The New Yorker.</span></em></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Salman Rushdie on Surviving the Fatwa</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Thirty-four years ago, the Ayatollah Khomeini, the Supreme Leader of Iran, issued a fatwa calling for the assassination of the novelist Salman Rushdie, whose book “The Satanic Verses” Khomeini declared blasphemous. It caused a worldwide uproar. Rushdie lived in hiding in London for a decade before moving to New York, where he began to let his guard down. “I had come to feel that it was a very long time ago and, and that the world moves on,” he tells David Remnick. “That’s what I had agreed with myself was the case. And then it wasn’t.” In August of last year, a man named Hadi Matar attacked Rushdie onstage before a public event, stabbing him about a dozen times. Rushdie barely survived. Now, in his first interview since the assassination attempt, Rushdie discusses the long shadow of the fatwa; his recovery from extensive injuries; and his writing. It was “just a piece of fortune, given what happened,” that Rushdie had finished work on a new novel, “Victory City,” weeks before the attack. The book is being published this week. “I’ve always thought that my books are more interesting than my life,” he remarks. “Unfortunately, the world appears to disagree.” </span></p>
<p><em><span>David Remnick’s Profile of Rushdie appears in the February 13th &amp; 20th issue of The New Yorker.</span></em></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Thirty-four years ago, the Ayatollah Khomeini, the Supreme Leader of Iran, issued a fatwa calling for the assassination of the novelist Salman Rushdie, whose book “The Satanic Verses” Khomeini declared blasphemous. It caused a worldwide uproar. Rushdie lived in hiding in London for a decade before moving to New York, where he began to let his guard down. “I had come to feel that it was a very long time ago and, and that the world moves on,” he tells David Remnick. “That’s what I had agreed with myself was the case. And then it wasn’t.” In August of last year, a man named Hadi Matar attacked Rushdie onstage before a public event, stabbing him about a dozen times. Rushdie barely survived. Now, in his first interview since the assassination attempt, Rushdie discusses the long shadow of the fatwa; his recovery from extensive injuries; and his writing. It was “just a piece of fortune, given what happened,” that Rushdie had finished work on a new novel, “Victory City,” weeks before the attack. The book is being published this week. “I’ve always thought that my books are more interesting than my life,” he remarks. “Unfortunately, the world appears to disagree.”  David Remnick’s Profile of Rushdie appears in the February 13th &amp;amp; 20th issue of The New Yorker.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Bonnie Raitt Talks with David Remnick
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/bonnie-raitt-talks-david-remnick-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;You couldn’t write a history of American music without a solid chapter on Bonnie Raitt. From her roots as a blues guitarist, she’s created a gorgeous melange of rock, R. &amp;amp; B., blues, folk, and country—helping to establish a new category now known as Americana. But she’s far from resting on her laurels; her latest album, “Just Like That . . . ,” is nominated for four Grammy Awards this year, including Song of the Year—a category in which her competition includes Beyoncé and Adele, stars a generation younger than Raitt. She talks with David Remnick about her early career in the blues clubs of Boston; the relationship between older Black artists and the nineteen-sixties generation of younger white afficionados; and the state of the genre today. “The way that blues and R. &amp;amp; B. and soul music [are] interwoven with so many different styles now . . . the cross pollination of influences that streaming has made possible—it means that blues is always at the root of whatever funky music is out at the time,” she says. Raitt also reflects on how finding sobriety in her forties changed her music. “I think a lot of us are busy putting on a big persona—proving ourselves in the world—for the first two decades of our careers,” she says. “I became more who I really am at forty-one than I was at thirty-one.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5243580a-32bf-489b-afed-c9b412dcdf98</guid><enclosure length="20800000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour020323_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1296100"/><category>arts</category><category>blues</category><category>bonnie_raitt</category><category>country_music</category><category>grammy_awards</category><category>music</category><category>slide_guitar</category><category>songwriting</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour020323_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1296100"/><media:description type="plain">Bonnie Raitt Talks with David Remnick
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/02/NYRH_20230203_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>21:40</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>You couldn’t write a history of American music without a solid chapter on Bonnie Raitt. From her roots as a blues guitarist, she’s created a gorgeous melange of rock, R. &amp; B., blues, folk, and country—helping to establish a new category now known as Americana. But she’s far from resting on her laurels; her latest album, “Just Like That . . . ,” is nominated for four Grammy Awards this year, including Song of the Year—a category in which her competition includes Beyoncé and Adele, stars a generation younger than Raitt. She talks with David Remnick about her early career in the blues clubs of Boston; the relationship between older Black artists and the nineteen-sixties generation of younger white afficionados; and the state of the genre today. “The way that blues and R. &amp; B. and soul music [are] interwoven with so many different styles now . . . the cross pollination of influences that streaming has made possible—it means that blues is always at the root of whatever funky music is out at the time,” she says. Raitt also reflects on how finding sobriety in her forties changed her music. “I think a lot of us are busy putting on a big persona—proving ourselves in the world—for the first two decades of our careers,” she says. “I became more who I really am at forty-one than I was at thirty-one.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Bonnie Raitt Talks with David Remnick</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>You couldn’t write a history of American music without a solid chapter on Bonnie Raitt. From her roots as a blues guitarist, she’s created a gorgeous melange of rock, R. &amp; B., blues, folk, and country—helping to establish a new category now known as Americana. But she’s far from resting on her laurels; her latest album, “Just Like That . . . ,” is nominated for four Grammy Awards this year, including Song of the Year—a category in which her competition includes Beyoncé and Adele, stars a generation younger than Raitt. She talks with David Remnick about her early career in the blues clubs of Boston; the relationship between older Black artists and the nineteen-sixties generation of younger white afficionados; and the state of the genre today. “The way that blues and R. &amp; B. and soul music [are] interwoven with so many different styles now . . . the cross pollination of influences that streaming has made possible—it means that blues is always at the root of whatever funky music is out at the time,” she says. Raitt also reflects on how finding sobriety in her forties changed her music. “I think a lot of us are busy putting on a big persona—proving ourselves in the world—for the first two decades of our careers,” she says. “I became more who I really am at forty-one than I was at thirty-one.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>You couldn’t write a history of American music without a solid chapter on Bonnie Raitt. From her roots as a blues guitarist, she’s created a gorgeous melange of rock, R. &amp;amp; B., blues, folk, and country—helping to establish a new category now known as Americana. But she’s far from resting on her laurels; her latest album, “Just Like That . . . ,” is nominated for four Grammy Awards this year, including Song of the Year—a category in which her competition includes Beyoncé and Adele, stars a generation younger than Raitt. She talks with David Remnick about her early career in the blues clubs of Boston; the relationship between older Black artists and the nineteen-sixties generation of younger white afficionados; and the state of the genre today. “The way that blues and R. &amp;amp; B. and soul music [are] interwoven with so many different styles now . . . the cross pollination of influences that streaming has made possible—it means that blues is always at the root of whatever funky music is out at the time,” she says. Raitt also reflects on how finding sobriety in her forties changed her music. “I think a lot of us are busy putting on a big persona—proving ourselves in the world—for the first two decades of our careers,” she says. “I became more who I really am at forty-one than I was at thirty-one.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Custody Battles Awaiting Mothers of Children Conceived in Rape
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/custody-battles-awaiting-mothers-children-conceived-rape/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Exceptions in the case of rape used to be considered a necessity in abortion legislation, even within the pro-life movement. But today ten states have no rape exception in their abortion laws, and more will likely consider moving in that direction this year. “I think few people understand how common this scenario actually is,” the contributing writer Eren Orbey, who has &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/12/12/an-anti-abortion-activists-quest-to-end-the-rape-exception"&gt;&lt;span&gt;reported&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; on the issue, says; according to C.D.C. statistics, nearly three million women have become pregnant as a result of rape. With abortion laws changing, more and more women will be forced to carry these pregnancies to term. In some cases, they’ll find themselves tied to their assailants through the family-court system until their children turn eighteen. “Many states . . . require a conviction for first-degree rape—which is really hard to come by even if there’s a lot of evidence—in order to terminate parental rights,” Lucy Guarnera, a professor of psychiatry and neurobehavioral sciences at the University of Virginia, says. Orbey talks with Guarnera, one of a few researchers who have studied this issue in depth, and with a mother of twins about the challenges of parenthood under these conditions. “The reality is: these exceptions are far less effective than we assume they are,” Orbey says. “They create the false impression that we’re taking care of all rape survivors when we’re not.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">76b922d0-2dcd-48f0-89be-4013e50d22c1</guid><enclosure length="20480000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour013123_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1293623"/><category>abortion</category><category>child_custody</category><category>politics</category><category>religion_faith</category><category>science</category><category>sexual_assault</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour013123_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1293623"/><media:description type="plain">The Custody Battles Awaiting Mothers of Children Conceived in Rape
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/01/EricGay_Abortion.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>21:20</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Exceptions in the case of rape used to be considered a necessity in abortion legislation, even within the pro-life movement. But today ten states have no rape exception in their abortion laws, and more will likely consider moving in that direction this year. “I think few people understand how common this scenario actually is,” the contributing writer Eren Orbey, who has </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/12/12/an-anti-abortion-activists-quest-to-end-the-rape-exception"><span>reported</span></a><span> on the issue, says; according to C.D.C. statistics, nearly three million women have become pregnant as a result of rape. With abortion laws changing, more and more women will be forced to carry these pregnancies to term. In some cases, they’ll find themselves tied to their assailants through the family-court system until their children turn eighteen. “Many states . . . require a conviction for first-degree rape—which is really hard to come by even if there’s a lot of evidence—in order to terminate parental rights,” Lucy Guarnera, a professor of psychiatry and neurobehavioral sciences at the University of Virginia, says. Orbey talks with Guarnera, one of a few researchers who have studied this issue in depth, and with a mother of twins about the challenges of parenthood under these conditions. “The reality is: these exceptions are far less effective than we assume they are,” Orbey says. “They create the false impression that we’re taking care of all rape survivors when we’re not.” </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Custody Battles Awaiting Mothers of Children Conceived in Rape</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Exceptions in the case of rape used to be considered a necessity in abortion legislation, even within the pro-life movement. But today ten states have no rape exception in their abortion laws, and more will likely consider moving in that direction this year. “I think few people understand how common this scenario actually is,” the contributing writer Eren Orbey, who has </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/12/12/an-anti-abortion-activists-quest-to-end-the-rape-exception"><span>reported</span></a><span> on the issue, says; according to C.D.C. statistics, nearly three million women have become pregnant as a result of rape. With abortion laws changing, more and more women will be forced to carry these pregnancies to term. In some cases, they’ll find themselves tied to their assailants through the family-court system until their children turn eighteen. “Many states . . . require a conviction for first-degree rape—which is really hard to come by even if there’s a lot of evidence—in order to terminate parental rights,” Lucy Guarnera, a professor of psychiatry and neurobehavioral sciences at the University of Virginia, says. Orbey talks with Guarnera, one of a few researchers who have studied this issue in depth, and with a mother of twins about the challenges of parenthood under these conditions. “The reality is: these exceptions are far less effective than we assume they are,” Orbey says. “They create the false impression that we’re taking care of all rape survivors when we’re not.” </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Exceptions in the case of rape used to be considered a necessity in abortion legislation, even within the pro-life movement. But today ten states have no rape exception in their abortion laws, and more will likely consider moving in that direction this year. “I think few people understand how common this scenario actually is,” the contributing writer Eren Orbey, who has reported on the issue, says; according to C.D.C. statistics, nearly three million women have become pregnant as a result of rape. With abortion laws changing, more and more women will be forced to carry these pregnancies to term. In some cases, they’ll find themselves tied to their assailants through the family-court system until their children turn eighteen. “Many states . . . require a conviction for first-degree rape—which is really hard to come by even if there’s a lot of evidence—in order to terminate parental rights,” Lucy Guarnera, a professor of psychiatry and neurobehavioral sciences at the University of Virginia, says. Orbey talks with Guarnera, one of a few researchers who have studied this issue in depth, and with a mother of twins about the challenges of parenthood under these conditions. “The reality is: these exceptions are far less effective than we assume they are,” Orbey says. “They create the false impression that we’re taking care of all rape survivors when we’re not.” </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>What Exactly Does “Woke” Mean, and How Did It Become so Powerful?
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/what-exactly-does-woke-mean-and-how-did-it-become-so-powerful/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Many on the right blame “wokeness” for all of America’s ills—everything from deadly mass shootings to lower military recruitment. Florida’s governor, Ron DeSantis, recently signed a so-called Stop WOKE Act into law, and made the issue the center of his midterm victory speech. In Washington, there has been talk in the House of forming an “anti-woke caucus.” “I think ‘woke’ is a very interesting term right now, because I think it’s an unusable word—although it is used all the time—because it doesn’t actually mean anything,” the linguist and lexicographer Tony Thorne, the author of “Dictionary of Contemporary Slang,” tells David Remnick. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, the poet Robin Coste Lewis talks with the staff writer Hilton Als about how suffering a traumatic brian injury led her to a career in poetry. Her most recent book, “To the Realization of Perfect Helplessness,” was published last month.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e8100ab0-23fe-4a7b-bcbe-9bcd27ea9467</guid><enclosure length="28240000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour012723_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1293621"/><category>arts</category><category>linguistics</category><category>poetry</category><category>politics</category><category>social_justice</category><category>woke</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour012723_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1293621"/><media:description type="plain">What Exactly Does “Woke” Mean, and How Did It Become so Powerful?
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/01/NYRH_012723_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>29:25</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Many on the right blame “wokeness” for all of America’s ills—everything from deadly mass shootings to lower military recruitment. Florida’s governor, Ron DeSantis, recently signed a so-called Stop WOKE Act into law, and made the issue the center of his midterm victory speech. In Washington, there has been talk in the House of forming an “anti-woke caucus.” “I think ‘woke’ is a very interesting term right now, because I think it’s an unusable word—although it is used all the time—because it doesn’t actually mean anything,” the linguist and lexicographer Tony Thorne, the author of “Dictionary of Contemporary Slang,” tells David Remnick. </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, the poet Robin Coste Lewis talks with the staff writer Hilton Als about how suffering a traumatic brian injury led her to a career in poetry. Her most recent book, “To the Realization of Perfect Helplessness,” was published last month.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>What Exactly Does “Woke” Mean, and How Did It Become so Powerful?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Many on the right blame “wokeness” for all of America’s ills—everything from deadly mass shootings to lower military recruitment. Florida’s governor, Ron DeSantis, recently signed a so-called Stop WOKE Act into law, and made the issue the center of his midterm victory speech. In Washington, there has been talk in the House of forming an “anti-woke caucus.” “I think ‘woke’ is a very interesting term right now, because I think it’s an unusable word—although it is used all the time—because it doesn’t actually mean anything,” the linguist and lexicographer Tony Thorne, the author of “Dictionary of Contemporary Slang,” tells David Remnick. </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, the poet Robin Coste Lewis talks with the staff writer Hilton Als about how suffering a traumatic brian injury led her to a career in poetry. Her most recent book, “To the Realization of Perfect Helplessness,” was published last month.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Many on the right blame “wokeness” for all of America’s ills—everything from deadly mass shootings to lower military recruitment. Florida’s governor, Ron DeSantis, recently signed a so-called Stop WOKE Act into law, and made the issue the center of his midterm victory speech. In Washington, there has been talk in the House of forming an “anti-woke caucus.” “I think ‘woke’ is a very interesting term right now, because I think it’s an unusable word—although it is used all the time—because it doesn’t actually mean anything,” the linguist and lexicographer Tony Thorne, the author of “Dictionary of Contemporary Slang,” tells David Remnick.  Plus, the poet Robin Coste Lewis talks with the staff writer Hilton Als about how suffering a traumatic brian injury led her to a career in poetry. Her most recent book, “To the Realization of Perfect Helplessness,” was published last month.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Michael Schulman on Oscars History, and a Visit with “Annie” Composer Charles Strouse
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/michael-schulman-oscars-history-and-visit-annie-composer-charles-strouse/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Despite years of controversy, the Academy Awards and the other awards shows remain must-watch television for many Americans. The awards may be “unreliable as a pure measure of cinematic worth,” Schulman tells David Remnick. “But I would argue that the Oscars are sort of a decoder ring for cultural conflict and where the industry is headed,” Schulman says. “They are a way to understand where pop culture is.” With theatre attendance in continuing decline, the Academy is looking for solutions, Schulman believes, and that could result in a higher-grossing outlier winner for the coveted Best Picture award. Plus, a visit with the Broadway composer Charles Strouse, who is ninety-four and compiling his archives to donate to the Library of Congress. He reflects on his work with Jay-Z and his “friendly enemy” relationship with Stephen Sondheim: “He didn’t like me much. I didn’t like him less.” Still nimble at the piano, Strouse plays a rendition of his classic, “Tomorrow.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4e7edf97-46fb-4927-8972-f29ec6a073ed</guid><enclosure length="26800000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour012423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1291312"/><category>academy_awards</category><category>annie</category><category>arts</category><category>books</category><category>broadway</category><category>movies</category><category>oscars</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour012423_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1291312"/><media:description type="plain">Michael Schulman on Oscars History, and a Visit with “Annie” Composer Charles Strouse
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/01/Sayles_Oscars_xvbw7JI.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>27:55</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Despite years of controversy, the Academy Awards and the other awards shows remain must-watch television for many Americans. The awards may be “unreliable as a pure measure of cinematic worth,” Schulman tells David Remnick. “But I would argue that the Oscars are sort of a decoder ring for cultural conflict and where the industry is headed,” Schulman says. “They are a way to understand where pop culture is.” With theatre attendance in continuing decline, the Academy is looking for solutions, Schulman believes, and that could result in a higher-grossing outlier winner for the coveted Best Picture award. Plus, a visit with the Broadway composer Charles Strouse, who is ninety-four and compiling his archives to donate to the Library of Congress. He reflects on his work with Jay-Z and his “friendly enemy” relationship with Stephen Sondheim: “He didn’t like me much. I didn’t like him less.” Still nimble at the piano, Strouse plays a rendition of his classic, “Tomorrow.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Michael Schulman on Oscars History, and a Visit with “Annie” Composer Charles Strouse</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Despite years of controversy, the Academy Awards and the other awards shows remain must-watch television for many Americans. The awards may be “unreliable as a pure measure of cinematic worth,” Schulman tells David Remnick. “But I would argue that the Oscars are sort of a decoder ring for cultural conflict and where the industry is headed,” Schulman says. “They are a way to understand where pop culture is.” With theatre attendance in continuing decline, the Academy is looking for solutions, Schulman believes, and that could result in a higher-grossing outlier winner for the coveted Best Picture award. Plus, a visit with the Broadway composer Charles Strouse, who is ninety-four and compiling his archives to donate to the Library of Congress. He reflects on his work with Jay-Z and his “friendly enemy” relationship with Stephen Sondheim: “He didn’t like me much. I didn’t like him less.” Still nimble at the piano, Strouse plays a rendition of his classic, “Tomorrow.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Despite years of controversy, the Academy Awards and the other awards shows remain must-watch television for many Americans. The awards may be “unreliable as a pure measure of cinematic worth,” Schulman tells David Remnick. “But I would argue that the Oscars are sort of a decoder ring for cultural conflict and where the industry is headed,” Schulman says. “They are a way to understand where pop culture is.” With theatre attendance in continuing decline, the Academy is looking for solutions, Schulman believes, and that could result in a higher-grossing outlier winner for the coveted Best Picture award. Plus, a visit with the Broadway composer Charles Strouse, who is ninety-four and compiling his archives to donate to the Library of Congress. He reflects on his work with Jay-Z and his “friendly enemy” relationship with Stephen Sondheim: “He didn’t like me much. I didn’t like him less.” Still nimble at the piano, Strouse plays a rendition of his classic, “Tomorrow.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>A Local Paper First Sounded the Alarm on George Santos. Nobody Listened.
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/local-paper-first-sounded-alarm-george-santos-nobody-listened/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;George Santos is hardly the first scammer elected to office—but his lies, David Remnick says, are “extra.” Most Americans learned of Santos’s extraordinary fabrications from a New York &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Times&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; report published after the midterm election, but a local newspaper called the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;North Shore Leader&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; was sounding the alarm months before. The &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;New Yorker &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/clare-malone"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Clare Malone&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; took a trip to Long Island to speak with the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Leader’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; publisher, Grant Lally, and its managing editor, Maureen Daly, to find out how the story began. “We heard story after story after story about him doing bizarre things,” Lally told her. “He was so well known, at least in the more active political circles, to be a liar, that by early summer he was already being called George Scamtos.” Lally explains how redistricting drama in New York State turned Santos from a “sacrificial” candidate—to whom no one was paying attention—to a front-runner. At the same time, Malone thinks, “the oddly permissive structure that the Republican Party has created for candidates on a gamut of issues” enabled his penchant for fabrication. “[There’s] lots of crazy stuff that’s popped up in politics over the past few years. I think maybe Santos thought, Eh, who’s gonna check?”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">626e3545-6789-4e42-ab6c-0b6d6a7b526a</guid><enclosure length="22368000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour012023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1291306"/><category>congress</category><category>lies</category><category>local</category><category>long_island</category><category>politics</category><category>republican</category><category>santos</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour012023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1291306"/><media:description type="plain">A Local Paper First Sounded the Alarm on George Santos. Nobody Listened.
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/01/NYRH_012023.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>23:18</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>George Santos is hardly the first scammer elected to office—but his lies, David Remnick says, are “extra.” Most Americans learned of Santos’s extraordinary fabrications from a New York </span><i><span>Times</span></i><span> report published after the midterm election, but a local newspaper called the </span><i><span>North Shore Leader</span></i><span> was sounding the alarm months before. The </span><i><span>New Yorker </span></i><span>staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/clare-malone"><span>Clare Malone</span></a><span> took a trip to Long Island to speak with the </span><i><span>Leader’s</span></i><span> publisher, Grant Lally, and its managing editor, Maureen Daly, to find out how the story began. “We heard story after story after story about him doing bizarre things,” Lally told her. “He was so well known, at least in the more active political circles, to be a liar, that by early summer he was already being called George Scamtos.” Lally explains how redistricting drama in New York State turned Santos from a “sacrificial” candidate—to whom no one was paying attention—to a front-runner. At the same time, Malone thinks, “the oddly permissive structure that the Republican Party has created for candidates on a gamut of issues” enabled his penchant for fabrication. “[There’s] lots of crazy stuff that’s popped up in politics over the past few years. I think maybe Santos thought, Eh, who’s gonna check?”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>A Local Paper First Sounded the Alarm on George Santos. Nobody Listened.</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>George Santos is hardly the first scammer elected to office—but his lies, David Remnick says, are “extra.” Most Americans learned of Santos’s extraordinary fabrications from a New York </span><i><span>Times</span></i><span> report published after the midterm election, but a local newspaper called the </span><i><span>North Shore Leader</span></i><span> was sounding the alarm months before. The </span><i><span>New Yorker </span></i><span>staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/clare-malone"><span>Clare Malone</span></a><span> took a trip to Long Island to speak with the </span><i><span>Leader’s</span></i><span> publisher, Grant Lally, and its managing editor, Maureen Daly, to find out how the story began. “We heard story after story after story about him doing bizarre things,” Lally told her. “He was so well known, at least in the more active political circles, to be a liar, that by early summer he was already being called George Scamtos.” Lally explains how redistricting drama in New York State turned Santos from a “sacrificial” candidate—to whom no one was paying attention—to a front-runner. At the same time, Malone thinks, “the oddly permissive structure that the Republican Party has created for candidates on a gamut of issues” enabled his penchant for fabrication. “[There’s] lots of crazy stuff that’s popped up in politics over the past few years. I think maybe Santos thought, Eh, who’s gonna check?”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>George Santos is hardly the first scammer elected to office—but his lies, David Remnick says, are “extra.” Most Americans learned of Santos’s extraordinary fabrications from a New York Times report published after the midterm election, but a local newspaper called the North Shore Leader was sounding the alarm months before. The New Yorker staff writer Clare Malone took a trip to Long Island to speak with the Leader’s publisher, Grant Lally, and its managing editor, Maureen Daly, to find out how the story began. “We heard story after story after story about him doing bizarre things,” Lally told her. “He was so well known, at least in the more active political circles, to be a liar, that by early summer he was already being called George Scamtos.” Lally explains how redistricting drama in New York State turned Santos from a “sacrificial” candidate—to whom no one was paying attention—to a front-runner. At the same time, Malone thinks, “the oddly permissive structure that the Republican Party has created for candidates on a gamut of issues” enabled his penchant for fabrication. “[There’s] lots of crazy stuff that’s popped up in politics over the past few years. I think maybe Santos thought, Eh, who’s gonna check?”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Deepti Kapoor Discusses “Age of Vice” with Parul Sehgal
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/deepti-kapoor-discusses-age-vice-parul-sehgal/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Deepti Kapoor describes New Delhi, the setting of her novel “Age of Vice” as “extremely beautiful, but also violent. . . . It’s a place where you think you’re gonna get cheated and robbed until someone does something incredibly kind and breaks your heart.” The highly anticipated book, published simultaneously in twenty countries this month, is part crime thriller, part family saga centered on a reckless playboy who wants to break away from his mob family; a young man working as a servant to him; and a naïve young journalist. Kapoor, who spent a decade as a journalist herself, tells &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/parul-sehgal"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Parul Sehgal&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; that she wrote the book while living abroad—needing the distance from her country in order to see it more clearly. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f57e587c-2f27-4ff5-aecc-29dea1990063</guid><enclosure length="15840000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour011723_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1288984"/><category>books</category><category>crime</category><category>fiction</category><category>india</category><category>new_dehli</category><category>novel</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour011723_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1288984"/><media:description type="plain">Deepti Kapoor Discusses “Age of Vice” with Parul Sehgal
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/01/DeeptiKapoor_MattewParker.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>16:30</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Deepti Kapoor describes New Delhi, the setting of her novel “Age of Vice” as “extremely beautiful, but also violent. . . . It’s a place where you think you’re gonna get cheated and robbed until someone does something incredibly kind and breaks your heart.” The highly anticipated book, published simultaneously in twenty countries this month, is part crime thriller, part family saga centered on a reckless playboy who wants to break away from his mob family; a young man working as a servant to him; and a naïve young journalist. Kapoor, who spent a decade as a journalist herself, tells </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/parul-sehgal"><span>Parul Sehgal</span></a><span> that she wrote the book while living abroad—needing the distance from her country in order to see it more clearly. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Deepti Kapoor Discusses “Age of Vice” with Parul Sehgal</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Deepti Kapoor describes New Delhi, the setting of her novel “Age of Vice” as “extremely beautiful, but also violent. . . . It’s a place where you think you’re gonna get cheated and robbed until someone does something incredibly kind and breaks your heart.” The highly anticipated book, published simultaneously in twenty countries this month, is part crime thriller, part family saga centered on a reckless playboy who wants to break away from his mob family; a young man working as a servant to him; and a naïve young journalist. Kapoor, who spent a decade as a journalist herself, tells </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/parul-sehgal"><span>Parul Sehgal</span></a><span> that she wrote the book while living abroad—needing the distance from her country in order to see it more clearly. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Deepti Kapoor describes New Delhi, the setting of her novel “Age of Vice” as “extremely beautiful, but also violent. . . . It’s a place where you think you’re gonna get cheated and robbed until someone does something incredibly kind and breaks your heart.” The highly anticipated book, published simultaneously in twenty countries this month, is part crime thriller, part family saga centered on a reckless playboy who wants to break away from his mob family; a young man working as a servant to him; and a naïve young journalist. Kapoor, who spent a decade as a journalist herself, tells Parul Sehgal that she wrote the book while living abroad—needing the distance from her country in order to see it more clearly.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>In Politics, How Old Is Too Old?
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/politics-how-old-too-old-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;It wasn’t so long ago that Ronald Reagan was considered over the hill, too old to govern. Now a sitting President has turned eighty in office, and a Presidential contest between Joe Biden and Donald Trump would put two near-eighty-year-olds against each other. (Trump—while denying President Biden’s fitness—commented, “Life begins at eighty.”) Yet the question of age has not disappeared; even some of Biden’s ardent supporters have expressed concerns about him starting a second term. David Remnick talks with the gerontologist Jack Rowe, a professor at Columbia University who also founded Harvard Medical School’s Division on Aging, about how to evaluate a candidate’s competency for office; and with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jill-lepore"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jill Lepore&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jane-mayer"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jane Mayer&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, keen observers of the Presidency. Rowe argues that ageism underlies the public discourse; an occasional slip or unsteadiness, he thinks, is not consequential to the job. “If I give you a seventy-eight-year-old man with a history of heart disease, you don’t know if he’s in a nursing home or on the Supreme Court of the United States,” he tells Remnick. But Lepore and Mayer argue public opinion, and not only medical prognosis, should be considered seriously as we look at aging politicians. If Biden and Trump face off, Lepore says, “Age won’t be an issue between them. But age will be an issue for American voters. . . . I think of the young people that I teach everyday. They will be furious.” Mayer sees something anti-democratic in play as well. “Incumbency is such an advantage at this point,” she notes, that “it leads to gerontocracy,” because “it’s really hard to unseat someone.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2023 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5228c679-6343-44bc-8b70-d04a00652d98</guid><enclosure length="32656000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour011323b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1288982"/><category>aging</category><category>biden</category><category>old</category><category>politicians</category><category>politics</category><category>president</category><category>science</category><category>trump</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour011323b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1288982"/><media:description type="plain">In Politics, How Old Is Too Old?
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/01/NYRH_011323_Image.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>34:01</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>It wasn’t so long ago that Ronald Reagan was considered over the hill, too old to govern. Now a sitting President has turned eighty in office, and a Presidential contest between Joe Biden and Donald Trump would put two near-eighty-year-olds against each other. (Trump—while denying President Biden’s fitness—commented, “Life begins at eighty.”) Yet the question of age has not disappeared; even some of Biden’s ardent supporters have expressed concerns about him starting a second term. David Remnick talks with the gerontologist Jack Rowe, a professor at Columbia University who also founded Harvard Medical School’s Division on Aging, about how to evaluate a candidate’s competency for office; and with</span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jill-lepore"><span> Jill Lepore</span></a><span> and </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jane-mayer"><span>Jane Mayer</span></a><span>, keen observers of the Presidency. Rowe argues that ageism underlies the public discourse; an occasional slip or unsteadiness, he thinks, is not consequential to the job. “If I give you a seventy-eight-year-old man with a history of heart disease, you don’t know if he’s in a nursing home or on the Supreme Court of the United States,” he tells Remnick. But Lepore and Mayer argue public opinion, and not only medical prognosis, should be considered seriously as we look at aging politicians. If Biden and Trump face off, Lepore says, “Age won’t be an issue between them. But age will be an issue for American voters. . . . I think of the young people that I teach everyday. They will be furious.” Mayer sees something anti-democratic in play as well. “Incumbency is such an advantage at this point,” she notes, that “it leads to gerontocracy,” because “it’s really hard to unseat someone.” </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>In Politics, How Old Is Too Old?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>It wasn’t so long ago that Ronald Reagan was considered over the hill, too old to govern. Now a sitting President has turned eighty in office, and a Presidential contest between Joe Biden and Donald Trump would put two near-eighty-year-olds against each other. (Trump—while denying President Biden’s fitness—commented, “Life begins at eighty.”) Yet the question of age has not disappeared; even some of Biden’s ardent supporters have expressed concerns about him starting a second term. David Remnick talks with the gerontologist Jack Rowe, a professor at Columbia University who also founded Harvard Medical School’s Division on Aging, about how to evaluate a candidate’s competency for office; and with</span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jill-lepore"><span> Jill Lepore</span></a><span> and </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jane-mayer"><span>Jane Mayer</span></a><span>, keen observers of the Presidency. Rowe argues that ageism underlies the public discourse; an occasional slip or unsteadiness, he thinks, is not consequential to the job. “If I give you a seventy-eight-year-old man with a history of heart disease, you don’t know if he’s in a nursing home or on the Supreme Court of the United States,” he tells Remnick. But Lepore and Mayer argue public opinion, and not only medical prognosis, should be considered seriously as we look at aging politicians. If Biden and Trump face off, Lepore says, “Age won’t be an issue between them. But age will be an issue for American voters. . . . I think of the young people that I teach everyday. They will be furious.” Mayer sees something anti-democratic in play as well. “Incumbency is such an advantage at this point,” she notes, that “it leads to gerontocracy,” because “it’s really hard to unseat someone.” </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>It wasn’t so long ago that Ronald Reagan was considered over the hill, too old to govern. Now a sitting President has turned eighty in office, and a Presidential contest between Joe Biden and Donald Trump would put two near-eighty-year-olds against each other. (Trump—while denying President Biden’s fitness—commented, “Life begins at eighty.”) Yet the question of age has not disappeared; even some of Biden’s ardent supporters have expressed concerns about him starting a second term. David Remnick talks with the gerontologist Jack Rowe, a professor at Columbia University who also founded Harvard Medical School’s Division on Aging, about how to evaluate a candidate’s competency for office; and with Jill Lepore and Jane Mayer, keen observers of the Presidency. Rowe argues that ageism underlies the public discourse; an occasional slip or unsteadiness, he thinks, is not consequential to the job. “If I give you a seventy-eight-year-old man with a history of heart disease, you don’t know if he’s in a nursing home or on the Supreme Court of the United States,” he tells Remnick. But Lepore and Mayer argue public opinion, and not only medical prognosis, should be considered seriously as we look at aging politicians. If Biden and Trump face off, Lepore says, “Age won’t be an issue between them. But age will be an issue for American voters. . . . I think of the young people that I teach everyday. They will be furious.” Mayer sees something anti-democratic in play as well. “Incumbency is such an advantage at this point,” she notes, that “it leads to gerontocracy,” because “it’s really hard to unseat someone.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Photographer Who Documented a Long-Forgotten Pan-African Festival
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/photographer-who-documented-long-forgotten-pan-african-festival/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Forty-six years ago, a young photographer named Marilyn Nance got the opportunity of a lifetime. A student at the Pratt Institute, an art school in Brooklyn, Nance had never left the country. But she became one of the official photographers documenting a festival in Lagos, Nigeria, called FESTAC ’77. The monthlong festival featured artists from across Africa and the diaspora, and has been described as the most important Black cultural event of the twentieth century. But, on returning from the festival, Nance didn’t find any takers to publish her photos, and fifty years later, few people know it took place. “I thought I would be talking about FESTAC in 1978, not in 2022,” Nance told the staff writer Julian Lucas. “If some tragic thing had happened, everybody would remember. . . . But I guess maybe there was no investment in celebrating Black joy.” A collection of Nance’s photographs from the event was published late in 2022, in the book “Last Day in Lagos.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">dc0273cd-96b5-4ddd-ab1a-bbdcbfc757ad</guid><enclosure length="16992000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour011023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1286964"/><category>africa</category><category>arts</category><category>books</category><category>lagos</category><category>photography</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour011023_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1286964"/><media:description type="plain">The Photographer Who Documented a Long-Forgotten Pan-African Festival
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/01/Nance_FESTACimage.png" width="130"/><itunes:duration>17:42</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Forty-six years ago, a young photographer named Marilyn Nance got the opportunity of a lifetime. A student at the Pratt Institute, an art school in Brooklyn, Nance had never left the country. But she became one of the official photographers documenting a festival in Lagos, Nigeria, called FESTAC ’77. The monthlong festival featured artists from across Africa and the diaspora, and has been described as the most important Black cultural event of the twentieth century. But, on returning from the festival, Nance didn’t find any takers to publish her photos, and fifty years later, few people know it took place. “I thought I would be talking about FESTAC in 1978, not in 2022,” Nance told the staff writer Julian Lucas. “If some tragic thing had happened, everybody would remember. . . . But I guess maybe there was no investment in celebrating Black joy.” A collection of Nance’s photographs from the event was published late in 2022, in the book “Last Day in Lagos.” </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Photographer Who Documented a Long-Forgotten Pan-African Festival</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Forty-six years ago, a young photographer named Marilyn Nance got the opportunity of a lifetime. A student at the Pratt Institute, an art school in Brooklyn, Nance had never left the country. But she became one of the official photographers documenting a festival in Lagos, Nigeria, called FESTAC ’77. The monthlong festival featured artists from across Africa and the diaspora, and has been described as the most important Black cultural event of the twentieth century. But, on returning from the festival, Nance didn’t find any takers to publish her photos, and fifty years later, few people know it took place. “I thought I would be talking about FESTAC in 1978, not in 2022,” Nance told the staff writer Julian Lucas. “If some tragic thing had happened, everybody would remember. . . . But I guess maybe there was no investment in celebrating Black joy.” A collection of Nance’s photographs from the event was published late in 2022, in the book “Last Day in Lagos.” </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Forty-six years ago, a young photographer named Marilyn Nance got the opportunity of a lifetime. A student at the Pratt Institute, an art school in Brooklyn, Nance had never left the country. But she became one of the official photographers documenting a festival in Lagos, Nigeria, called FESTAC ’77. The monthlong festival featured artists from across Africa and the diaspora, and has been described as the most important Black cultural event of the twentieth century. But, on returning from the festival, Nance didn’t find any takers to publish her photos, and fifty years later, few people know it took place. “I thought I would be talking about FESTAC in 1978, not in 2022,” Nance told the staff writer Julian Lucas. “If some tragic thing had happened, everybody would remember. . . . But I guess maybe there was no investment in celebrating Black joy.” A collection of Nance’s photographs from the event was published late in 2022, in the book “Last Day in Lagos.” </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Bob Woodward on His Trump Tapes
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/bob-woodward-his-trump-tapes-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Bob Woodward is not one to editorialize. But, during his interviews with Donald Trump at the time of the COVID-19 crisis, Woodward found himself shouting at the President—explaining how to make a decision and trying to browbeat him into listening to public-health experts. Woodward has released audio recordings of some of their interviews in a new audiobook called “The Trump Tapes,” which documents details of Trump’s state of mind, and also of Woodward’s process and craft. “I could call him anytime, [and] he would call me,” Woodward tells David Remnick. His wife, Elsa Walsh, “used to joke [that] there’s three of us in the marriage.” And, in the wake of Damar Hamlin’s accident, the staff writer Louisa Thomas talks with David Remnick about an uncomfortable truth: football’s danger to players is part of its singular popularity. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">09a94516-daab-4682-ad1d-b23543783da4</guid><enclosure length="31664000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour010623_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1286963"/><category>books</category><category>photography</category><category>politics</category><category>trump</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour010623_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1286963"/><media:description type="plain">Bob Woodward on His Trump Tapes
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2023/01/NYRH_WoodwardTrump.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>32:59</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Bob Woodward is not one to editorialize. But, during his interviews with Donald Trump at the time of the COVID-19 crisis, Woodward found himself shouting at the President—explaining how to make a decision and trying to browbeat him into listening to public-health experts. Woodward has released audio recordings of some of their interviews in a new audiobook called “The Trump Tapes,” which documents details of Trump’s state of mind, and also of Woodward’s process and craft. “I could call him anytime, [and] he would call me,” Woodward tells David Remnick. His wife, Elsa Walsh, “used to joke [that] there’s three of us in the marriage.” And, in the wake of Damar Hamlin’s accident, the staff writer Louisa Thomas talks with David Remnick about an uncomfortable truth: football’s danger to players is part of its singular popularity. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Bob Woodward on His Trump Tapes</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Bob Woodward is not one to editorialize. But, during his interviews with Donald Trump at the time of the COVID-19 crisis, Woodward found himself shouting at the President—explaining how to make a decision and trying to browbeat him into listening to public-health experts. Woodward has released audio recordings of some of their interviews in a new audiobook called “The Trump Tapes,” which documents details of Trump’s state of mind, and also of Woodward’s process and craft. “I could call him anytime, [and] he would call me,” Woodward tells David Remnick. His wife, Elsa Walsh, “used to joke [that] there’s three of us in the marriage.” And, in the wake of Damar Hamlin’s accident, the staff writer Louisa Thomas talks with David Remnick about an uncomfortable truth: football’s danger to players is part of its singular popularity. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Bob Woodward is not one to editorialize. But, during his interviews with Donald Trump at the time of the COVID-19 crisis, Woodward found himself shouting at the President—explaining how to make a decision and trying to browbeat him into listening to public-health experts. Woodward has released audio recordings of some of their interviews in a new audiobook called “The Trump Tapes,” which documents details of Trump’s state of mind, and also of Woodward’s process and craft. “I could call him anytime, [and] he would call me,” Woodward tells David Remnick. His wife, Elsa Walsh, “used to joke [that] there’s three of us in the marriage.” And, in the wake of Damar Hamlin’s accident, the staff writer Louisa Thomas talks with David Remnick about an uncomfortable truth: football’s danger to players is part of its singular popularity. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>“Giselle,” and What to Do with the Problematic Past – Part II
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/giselle-and-what-do-problematic-past-part-ii/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;When the renowned choreographer Akram Khan was commissioned to update the classic “Giselle” for the English National Ballet, he couldn’t simply put new steps to a Romantic-era plot. Beautiful as it is, “Giselle” has a view of ideal womanhood that is insupportable in our century—and it didn’t reflect the women he knew.  In Khan’s 2016 “Giselle,” the title character doesn’t chastely expire from a broken heart; she is a strong woman victimized by more powerful men.  The story still culminates in an act of forgiveness, but in a way that resonates with the era of #MeToo. Vincenzo Lamagna composed the production’s new score. The producer Ngofeen Mputubwele describes the production as not simply a great modern ballet but a model for how to reimagine a story that doesn’t work anymore.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 10:43:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3be2bec6-370d-4bc0-a328-1f90a4c8d80c</guid><enclosure length="16016000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour010323_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1283070"/><category>arts</category><category>ballet</category><category>dance</category><category>me_too</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour010323_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1283070"/><media:description type="plain">“Giselle,” and What to Do with the Problematic Past – Part II
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/12/NYRH_Ballet_Giselle.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>16:41</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>When the renowned choreographer Akram Khan was commissioned to update the classic “Giselle” for the English National Ballet, he couldn’t simply put new steps to a Romantic-era plot. Beautiful as it is, “Giselle” has a view of ideal womanhood that is insupportable in our century—and it didn’t reflect the women he knew.  In Khan’s 2016 “Giselle,” the title character doesn’t chastely expire from a broken heart; she is a strong woman victimized by more powerful men.  The story still culminates in an act of forgiveness, but in a way that resonates with the era of #MeToo. Vincenzo Lamagna composed the production’s new score. The producer Ngofeen Mputubwele describes the production as not simply a great modern ballet but a model for how to reimagine a story that doesn’t work anymore.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>“Giselle,” and What to Do with the Problematic Past – Part II</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>When the renowned choreographer Akram Khan was commissioned to update the classic “Giselle” for the English National Ballet, he couldn’t simply put new steps to a Romantic-era plot. Beautiful as it is, “Giselle” has a view of ideal womanhood that is insupportable in our century—and it didn’t reflect the women he knew.  In Khan’s 2016 “Giselle,” the title character doesn’t chastely expire from a broken heart; she is a strong woman victimized by more powerful men.  The story still culminates in an act of forgiveness, but in a way that resonates with the era of #MeToo. Vincenzo Lamagna composed the production’s new score. The producer Ngofeen Mputubwele describes the production as not simply a great modern ballet but a model for how to reimagine a story that doesn’t work anymore.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>When the renowned choreographer Akram Khan was commissioned to update the classic “Giselle” for the English National Ballet, he couldn’t simply put new steps to a Romantic-era plot. Beautiful as it is, “Giselle” has a view of ideal womanhood that is insupportable in our century—and it didn’t reflect the women he knew.  In Khan’s 2016 “Giselle,” the title character doesn’t chastely expire from a broken heart; she is a strong woman victimized by more powerful men.  The story still culminates in an act of forgiveness, but in a way that resonates with the era of #MeToo. Vincenzo Lamagna composed the production’s new score. The producer Ngofeen Mputubwele describes the production as not simply a great modern ballet but a model for how to reimagine a story that doesn’t work anymore.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>What to Do with the Problematic Past, Part I
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/what-do-problematic-past-part-i/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;We draw meaning and comfort from traditions, but when the world changes, traditions can stop reflecting our values and cause us pain. This episode features three people struggling against traditions that have become problematic.  The producer Ngofeen Mputubwele talks with Jeanna Kadlec, the author of “Heretic,” a memoir of leaving the evangelical church; and the actor Britton Smith, a leader of Broadway Advocacy Coalition, which seeks to make Broadway an equitable workplace for performers of color. “The fire was loud and the reckoning was very visible to everyone,” Smith tells Mputubwele. “The fire crumbled into ashes, and now the ashes are starting to settle.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6ef84f0d-53f6-43dd-ba09-cb4d99f34275</guid><enclosure length="32464000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour123022_podcast_v2.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1283068"/><category>arts</category><category>books</category><category>broadway</category><category>equity</category><category>life</category><category>race</category><category>religion_faith</category><category>storytelling</category><category>tradition</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour123022_podcast_v2.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1283068"/><media:description type="plain">What to Do with the Problematic Past, Part I
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/12/SEGA-Jeanna-Kadlec-Heretic-megjoneswallphoto.JPG" width="130"/><itunes:duration>33:49</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>We draw meaning and comfort from traditions, but when the world changes, traditions can stop reflecting our values and cause us pain. This episode features three people struggling against traditions that have become problematic.  The producer Ngofeen Mputubwele talks with Jeanna Kadlec, the author of “Heretic,” a memoir of leaving the evangelical church; and the actor Britton Smith, a leader of Broadway Advocacy Coalition, which seeks to make Broadway an equitable workplace for performers of color. “The fire was loud and the reckoning was very visible to everyone,” Smith tells Mputubwele. “The fire crumbled into ashes, and now the ashes are starting to settle.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>What to Do with the Problematic Past, Part I</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>We draw meaning and comfort from traditions, but when the world changes, traditions can stop reflecting our values and cause us pain. This episode features three people struggling against traditions that have become problematic.  The producer Ngofeen Mputubwele talks with Jeanna Kadlec, the author of “Heretic,” a memoir of leaving the evangelical church; and the actor Britton Smith, a leader of Broadway Advocacy Coalition, which seeks to make Broadway an equitable workplace for performers of color. “The fire was loud and the reckoning was very visible to everyone,” Smith tells Mputubwele. “The fire crumbled into ashes, and now the ashes are starting to settle.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>We draw meaning and comfort from traditions, but when the world changes, traditions can stop reflecting our values and cause us pain. This episode features three people struggling against traditions that have become problematic.  The producer Ngofeen Mputubwele talks with Jeanna Kadlec, the author of “Heretic,” a memoir of leaving the evangelical church; and the actor Britton Smith, a leader of Broadway Advocacy Coalition, which seeks to make Broadway an equitable workplace for performers of color. “The fire was loud and the reckoning was very visible to everyone,” Smith tells Mputubwele. “The fire crumbled into ashes, and now the ashes are starting to settle.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>As Poet Laureate, Tracy K. Smith Hit the Road
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/poet-laureate-tracy-k-smith-road-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Tracy K. Smith was named Poet Laureate in 2017, at the beginning of the fierce partisan divide of the Trump era. She quickly turned to her craft to address the deep political divisions the election laid bare, putting together a collection called “American Journal: Fifty Poems for Our Time.” Then she hit the road, visiting community centers, senior centers, prisons, and colleges, and reading poems written by herself and others for groups small and large. “It was exhausting, and exhilarating, and it was probably the best thing I could have done as an American,” she told &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; poetry editor, Kevin Young. &lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment originally aired July 5, 2019.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b79967c9-a7d3-444e-889d-d199e7e5cef6</guid><enclosure length="21536000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour122722_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1280772"/><category>arts</category><category>poet</category><category>poet_laureate</category><category>poetry</category><category>tracy_k_smith</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour122722_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1280772"/><media:description type="plain">As Poet Laureate, Tracy K. Smith Hit the Road
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2018/09/AP_120416119184_YmIW5yy.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>22:26</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Tracy K. Smith was named Poet Laureate in 2017, at the beginning of the fierce partisan divide of the Trump era. She quickly turned to her craft to address the deep political divisions the election laid bare, putting together a collection called “American Journal: Fifty Poems for Our Time.” Then she hit the road, visiting community centers, senior centers, prisons, and colleges, and reading poems written by herself and others for groups small and large. “It was exhausting, and exhilarating, and it was probably the best thing I could have done as an American,” she told </span><em><span>The New Yorker’s</span></em><span> poetry editor, Kevin Young. </span> </p>
<p><em><span>This segment originally aired July 5, 2019.</span></em></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>As Poet Laureate, Tracy K. Smith Hit the Road</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Tracy K. Smith was named Poet Laureate in 2017, at the beginning of the fierce partisan divide of the Trump era. She quickly turned to her craft to address the deep political divisions the election laid bare, putting together a collection called “American Journal: Fifty Poems for Our Time.” Then she hit the road, visiting community centers, senior centers, prisons, and colleges, and reading poems written by herself and others for groups small and large. “It was exhausting, and exhilarating, and it was probably the best thing I could have done as an American,” she told </span><em><span>The New Yorker’s</span></em><span> poetry editor, Kevin Young. </span> </p>
<p><em><span>This segment originally aired July 5, 2019.</span></em></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Tracy K. Smith was named Poet Laureate in 2017, at the beginning of the fierce partisan divide of the Trump era. She quickly turned to her craft to address the deep political divisions the election laid bare, putting together a collection called “American Journal: Fifty Poems for Our Time.” Then she hit the road, visiting community centers, senior centers, prisons, and colleges, and reading poems written by herself and others for groups small and large. “It was exhausting, and exhilarating, and it was probably the best thing I could have done as an American,” she told The New Yorker’s poetry editor, Kevin Young.   This segment originally aired July 5, 2019.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Kirk Douglas, the Guitarist for the Roots, Revamps the Holiday Classics
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/kirk-douglas-guitarist-roots-holiday-classics-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;As the guitarist for the Roots, the band for “The Tonight Show,” Kirk Douglas plays anything and everything. So David Remnick put him to the test on some holiday classics. And two longtime &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; staffers, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/patricia-marx"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Patricia Marx&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/roz-chast"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Roz Chast&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, divulge their celebrated history playing together in a ukulele band. As the Daily Pukuleles, they claim, they influenced some of the biggest names in music in the sixties and beyond. But they were always a little too far ahead of the curve for the mainstream. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5c922eac-8c02-4707-8b54-188228bba5b8</guid><enclosure length="29648000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour122322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1280770"/><category>cartoonist</category><category>christmas</category><category>comedy</category><category>guitar</category><category>holiday</category><category>kirk_douglas</category><category>music</category><category>patricia_marx</category><category>roz_chast</category><category>ukulele</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour122322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1280770"/><media:description type="plain">Kirk Douglas, the Guitarist for the Roots, Revamps the Holiday Classics
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2018/12/Radio-Hour_Golden-Cosmos_Holidays_4x3.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>30:53</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>As the guitarist for the Roots, the band for “The Tonight Show,” Kirk Douglas plays anything and everything. So David Remnick put him to the test on some holiday classics. And two longtime </span><i><span>New Yorker</span></i><span> staffers, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/patricia-marx"><span>Patricia Marx</span></a><span> and </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/roz-chast"><span>Roz Chast</span></a><span>, divulge their celebrated history playing together in a ukulele band. As the Daily Pukuleles, they claim, they influenced some of the biggest names in music in the sixties and beyond. But they were always a little too far ahead of the curve for the mainstream. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Kirk Douglas, the Guitarist for the Roots, Revamps the Holiday Classics</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>As the guitarist for the Roots, the band for “The Tonight Show,” Kirk Douglas plays anything and everything. So David Remnick put him to the test on some holiday classics. And two longtime </span><i><span>New Yorker</span></i><span> staffers, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/patricia-marx"><span>Patricia Marx</span></a><span> and </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/roz-chast"><span>Roz Chast</span></a><span>, divulge their celebrated history playing together in a ukulele band. As the Daily Pukuleles, they claim, they influenced some of the biggest names in music in the sixties and beyond. But they were always a little too far ahead of the curve for the mainstream. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>As the guitarist for the Roots, the band for “The Tonight Show,” Kirk Douglas plays anything and everything. So David Remnick put him to the test on some holiday classics. And two longtime New Yorker staffers, Patricia Marx and Roz Chast, divulge their celebrated history playing together in a ukulele band. As the Daily Pukuleles, they claim, they influenced some of the biggest names in music in the sixties and beyond. But they were always a little too far ahead of the curve for the mainstream.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>An Audiobook Master on the Secrets of Her Craft
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/audiobook-master-secrets-her-craft-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;You’ve probably never heard of Robin Miles, but you may well have heard her—possibly at some length. Miles is an actor who’s cultivated a particular specialty in recording audiobooks, a booming segment of the publishing industry. She has lent her voice to more than 400 titles in all sorts of genres—from the classic “Charlotte’s Web” to Isabel Wilkerson’s “Caste,” a deep analysis of race in America. “Telling a story, fully, all of it—from all the aspects of it—and creating the kind of intimacy between you and your listener is so satisfying,” she tells the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; editor &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/daniel-a-gross"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Daniel Gross&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. “Being in a great play means you have to have the money and the other actors and a script and a director. This is just me and my book, and I love that.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e61eafb6-90b6-4e8e-b67e-4e8eefb8b750</guid><enclosure length="22224000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour122022_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1280700"/><category>arts</category><category>audiobook</category><category>books</category><category>robin_miles</category><category>voice_actors</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour122022_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1280700"/><media:description type="plain">An Audiobook Master on the Secrets of Her Craft
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/12/Robin-Miles-1024x682_JordanMatter.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>23:09</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>You’ve probably never heard of Robin Miles, but you may well have heard her—possibly at some length. Miles is an actor who’s cultivated a particular specialty in recording audiobooks, a booming segment of the publishing industry. She has lent her voice to more than 400 titles in all sorts of genres—from the classic “Charlotte’s Web” to Isabel Wilkerson’s “Caste,” a deep analysis of race in America. “Telling a story, fully, all of it—from all the aspects of it—and creating the kind of intimacy between you and your listener is so satisfying,” she tells the </span><i><span>New Yorker</span></i><span> editor </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/daniel-a-gross"><span>Daniel Gross</span></a><span>. “Being in a great play means you have to have the money and the other actors and a script and a director. This is just me and my book, and I love that.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>An Audiobook Master on the Secrets of Her Craft</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>You’ve probably never heard of Robin Miles, but you may well have heard her—possibly at some length. Miles is an actor who’s cultivated a particular specialty in recording audiobooks, a booming segment of the publishing industry. She has lent her voice to more than 400 titles in all sorts of genres—from the classic “Charlotte’s Web” to Isabel Wilkerson’s “Caste,” a deep analysis of race in America. “Telling a story, fully, all of it—from all the aspects of it—and creating the kind of intimacy between you and your listener is so satisfying,” she tells the </span><i><span>New Yorker</span></i><span> editor </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/daniel-a-gross"><span>Daniel Gross</span></a><span>. “Being in a great play means you have to have the money and the other actors and a script and a director. This is just me and my book, and I love that.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>You’ve probably never heard of Robin Miles, but you may well have heard her—possibly at some length. Miles is an actor who’s cultivated a particular specialty in recording audiobooks, a booming segment of the publishing industry. She has lent her voice to more than 400 titles in all sorts of genres—from the classic “Charlotte’s Web” to Isabel Wilkerson’s “Caste,” a deep analysis of race in America. “Telling a story, fully, all of it—from all the aspects of it—and creating the kind of intimacy between you and your listener is so satisfying,” she tells the New Yorker editor Daniel Gross. “Being in a great play means you have to have the money and the other actors and a script and a director. This is just me and my book, and I love that.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Ina Garten: Cooking Is Hard; Plus an Essay from Susan Orlean
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/ina-garten-cooking-hard-plus-essay-susan-orlean-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;With the Food Network program “Barefoot Contessa,” Ina Garten became a beloved household name. Although she is a gregarious teacher and presence on television, Garten &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;prefers to do her actual cooking alone. “Cooking’s hard for me. I mean, I do it a lot, but it’s really hard and I just love having the space to concentrate on what I’'m doing, so I make sure it comes out well.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;G&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;arten joins David Remnick to reflect on her early days in the kitchen, and to answer listener questions about holiday meals and more. Her latest book is “Go-To Dinners.” Plus, Susan Orlean joins with an installment from her column “Afterword.” She writes about the life of a Texas man who founded a rattlesnake handling business. He liked providing a service for his neighbors, and for whatever reason, he just loved rattlesnakes—a passion that proved fatal. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6cb3bd59-799d-4532-aba6-f69626e7c237</guid><enclosure length="26304000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour121622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1280698"/><category>chef</category><category>cooking</category><category>food</category><category>ina_garten</category><category>kitchen</category><category>obituary</category><category>rattlesnake</category><category>susan_orlean</category><category>texas</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour121622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1280698"/><media:description type="plain">Ina Garten: Cooking Is Hard; Plus an Essay from Susan Orlean
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/12/NYRH_InaGarten.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>27:24</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>With the Food Network program “Barefoot Contessa,” Ina Garten became a beloved household name. Although she is a gregarious teacher and presence on television, Garten </span><span>prefers to do her actual cooking alone. “Cooking’s hard for me. I mean, I do it a lot, but it’s really hard and I just love having the space to concentrate on what I’'m doing, so I make sure it comes out well.”<span> </span></span><span>G</span><span>arten joins David Remnick to reflect on her early days in the kitchen, and to answer listener questions about holiday meals and more. Her latest book is “Go-To Dinners.” Plus, Susan Orlean joins with an installment from her column “Afterword.” She writes about the life of a Texas man who founded a rattlesnake handling business. He liked providing a service for his neighbors, and for whatever reason, he just loved rattlesnakes—a passion that proved fatal.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Ina Garten: Cooking Is Hard; Plus an Essay from Susan Orlean</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>With the Food Network program “Barefoot Contessa,” Ina Garten became a beloved household name. Although she is a gregarious teacher and presence on television, Garten </span><span>prefers to do her actual cooking alone. “Cooking’s hard for me. I mean, I do it a lot, but it’s really hard and I just love having the space to concentrate on what I’'m doing, so I make sure it comes out well.”<span> </span></span><span>G</span><span>arten joins David Remnick to reflect on her early days in the kitchen, and to answer listener questions about holiday meals and more. Her latest book is “Go-To Dinners.” Plus, Susan Orlean joins with an installment from her column “Afterword.” She writes about the life of a Texas man who founded a rattlesnake handling business. He liked providing a service for his neighbors, and for whatever reason, he just loved rattlesnakes—a passion that proved fatal.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>With the Food Network program “Barefoot Contessa,” Ina Garten became a beloved household name. Although she is a gregarious teacher and presence on television, Garten prefers to do her actual cooking alone. “Cooking’s hard for me. I mean, I do it a lot, but it’s really hard and I just love having the space to concentrate on what I’'m doing, so I make sure it comes out well.” Garten joins David Remnick to reflect on her early days in the kitchen, and to answer listener questions about holiday meals and more. Her latest book is “Go-To Dinners.” Plus, Susan Orlean joins with an installment from her column “Afterword.” She writes about the life of a Texas man who founded a rattlesnake handling business. He liked providing a service for his neighbors, and for whatever reason, he just loved rattlesnakes—a passion that proved fatal.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The poet John Lee Clark Translates the DeafBlind Experience to the Page
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/poet-john-lee-clark-translates-deafblind-experience-page-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Although many hearing and sighted people imagine DeafBlind life in tragic terms, as an experience of isolation and darkness, the poet John Lee Clark’s writing is full of joy. It’s funny and surprising, mapping the contours of a regular life marked by common pleasures and frustrations. Clark, who was born Deaf and lost his sight at a young age, has established himself not just as a writer and translator but as a scholar of Deaf and DeafBlind literature. His new collection, “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://wwnorton.com/books/9781324035343"&gt;&lt;span&gt;How to Communicate&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;,” includes original works and translations from American Sign Language and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-inquiry/deafblind-communities-may-be-creating-a-new-language-of-touch"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Protactile&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. He speaks with the contributor Andrew Leland, who is working &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/635964/the-country-of-the-blind-by-andrew-leland/"&gt;&lt;span&gt;on a book&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; about his own experience of losing his sight in adulthood. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6d2b8415-924c-4f42-8c6d-b4ed450c8dc8</guid><enclosure length="24928000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour121322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1278448"/><category>arts</category><category>blind</category><category>deaf_community</category><category>poet</category><category>poetry</category><category>protactile</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour121322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1278448"/><media:description type="plain">The poet John Lee Clark Translates the DeafBlind Experience to the Page
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/12/john-lee-clark.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>25:58</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Although many hearing and sighted people imagine DeafBlind life in tragic terms, as an experience of isolation and darkness, the poet John Lee Clark’s writing is full of joy. It’s funny and surprising, mapping the contours of a regular life marked by common pleasures and frustrations. Clark, who was born Deaf and lost his sight at a young age, has established himself not just as a writer and translator but as a scholar of Deaf and DeafBlind literature. His new collection, “</span><a href="https://wwnorton.com/books/9781324035343"><span>How to Communicate</span></a><span>,” includes original works and translations from American Sign Language and </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-inquiry/deafblind-communities-may-be-creating-a-new-language-of-touch"><span>Protactile</span></a><span>. He speaks with the contributor Andrew Leland, who is working </span><a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/635964/the-country-of-the-blind-by-andrew-leland/"><span>on a book</span></a><span> about his own experience of losing his sight in adulthood. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The poet John Lee Clark Translates the DeafBlind Experience to the Page</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Although many hearing and sighted people imagine DeafBlind life in tragic terms, as an experience of isolation and darkness, the poet John Lee Clark’s writing is full of joy. It’s funny and surprising, mapping the contours of a regular life marked by common pleasures and frustrations. Clark, who was born Deaf and lost his sight at a young age, has established himself not just as a writer and translator but as a scholar of Deaf and DeafBlind literature. His new collection, “</span><a href="https://wwnorton.com/books/9781324035343"><span>How to Communicate</span></a><span>,” includes original works and translations from American Sign Language and </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-inquiry/deafblind-communities-may-be-creating-a-new-language-of-touch"><span>Protactile</span></a><span>. He speaks with the contributor Andrew Leland, who is working </span><a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/635964/the-country-of-the-blind-by-andrew-leland/"><span>on a book</span></a><span> about his own experience of losing his sight in adulthood. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Although many hearing and sighted people imagine DeafBlind life in tragic terms, as an experience of isolation and darkness, the poet John Lee Clark’s writing is full of joy. It’s funny and surprising, mapping the contours of a regular life marked by common pleasures and frustrations. Clark, who was born Deaf and lost his sight at a young age, has established himself not just as a writer and translator but as a scholar of Deaf and DeafBlind literature. His new collection, “How to Communicate,” includes original works and translations from American Sign Language and Protactile. He speaks with the contributor Andrew Leland, who is working on a book about his own experience of losing his sight in adulthood.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Politico’s Mathias Döpfner, and Sam Knight Reports from Qatar
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/politicos-mathias-dopfner-and-sam-knight-reports-qatar-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/sam-knight"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Sam Knight&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; was in Qatar recently, reporting on the World Cup, where, despite years of controversy, a familiar rhythm of upsets, triumphs, and defeats has taken hold. But he finds that the geographical shift toward an Arab nation may benefit the sport. Plus, David Remnick talks with Mathias Döpfner, the C.E.O. of the German news publisher Axel Springer, which acquired Politico for a billion dollars last year. Döpfner relishes taking provocative stances, but has been a vocal critic of media outlets that he says are increasingly catering to partisan audiences. “I think it is not about objectivity or neutrality,” he notes. “It is about plurality.” Politico, Döpfner says, is taking “a kind of contrarian bet: if everybody polarizes, the few who do differently may have the better future.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f45ac0a-bad2-432f-bcb4-3915226f885f</guid><enclosure length="24048000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour120922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1278443"/><category>journalism</category><category>media</category><category>middle_east</category><category>politico</category><category>politics</category><category>qatar</category><category>soccer</category><category>sports</category><category>washington</category><category>world_cup</category><category>world_cup_2022</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour120922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1278443"/><media:description type="plain">Politico’s Mathias Döpfner, and Sam Knight Reports from Qatar
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/12/NYRH_WorldCup.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>25:03</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/sam-knight"><span>Sam Knight</span></a><span> was in Qatar recently, reporting on the World Cup, where, despite years of controversy, a familiar rhythm of upsets, triumphs, and defeats has taken hold. But he finds that the geographical shift toward an Arab nation may benefit the sport. Plus, David Remnick talks with Mathias Döpfner, the C.E.O. of the German news publisher Axel Springer, which acquired Politico for a billion dollars last year. Döpfner relishes taking provocative stances, but has been a vocal critic of media outlets that he says are increasingly catering to partisan audiences. “I think it is not about objectivity or neutrality,” he notes. “It is about plurality.” Politico, Döpfner says, is taking “a kind of contrarian bet: if everybody polarizes, the few who do differently may have the better future.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Politico’s Mathias Döpfner, and Sam Knight Reports from Qatar</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/sam-knight"><span>Sam Knight</span></a><span> was in Qatar recently, reporting on the World Cup, where, despite years of controversy, a familiar rhythm of upsets, triumphs, and defeats has taken hold. But he finds that the geographical shift toward an Arab nation may benefit the sport. Plus, David Remnick talks with Mathias Döpfner, the C.E.O. of the German news publisher Axel Springer, which acquired Politico for a billion dollars last year. Döpfner relishes taking provocative stances, but has been a vocal critic of media outlets that he says are increasingly catering to partisan audiences. “I think it is not about objectivity or neutrality,” he notes. “It is about plurality.” Politico, Döpfner says, is taking “a kind of contrarian bet: if everybody polarizes, the few who do differently may have the better future.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The staff writer Sam Knight was in Qatar recently, reporting on the World Cup, where, despite years of controversy, a familiar rhythm of upsets, triumphs, and defeats has taken hold. But he finds that the geographical shift toward an Arab nation may benefit the sport. Plus, David Remnick talks with Mathias Döpfner, the C.E.O. of the German news publisher Axel Springer, which acquired Politico for a billion dollars last year. Döpfner relishes taking provocative stances, but has been a vocal critic of media outlets that he says are increasingly catering to partisan audiences. “I think it is not about objectivity or neutrality,” he notes. “It is about plurality.” Politico, Döpfner says, is taking “a kind of contrarian bet: if everybody polarizes, the few who do differently may have the better future.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Is Our Democracy Safe? 
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/our-democracy-safe-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;This year’s midterm elections were widely seen as a victory for democracy in the United States. Election deniers were defeated in many closely watched races and voting proceeded smoothly, even in areas where the Big Lie has taken a firm hold. But the threat of authoritarianism remains strong. David Remnick talks with Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, authors of the best-seller “How Democracies Die” about recent political trends. “You can’t really live in a functioning democracy if you feel like each election is a national emergency,” Ziblatt says. “Because what it means is that we’re not confronting the major problems confronting our society.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">14430be5-82f7-482d-aef6-80510fff10cb</guid><enclosure length="29392000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour120622b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1276244"/><category>authoritarianism</category><category>choco_taco</category><category>constitution</category><category>democracy</category><category>donald_trump</category><category>election</category><category>food</category><category>government</category><category>junk_food</category><category>obituary</category><category>politics</category><category>susan_orlean</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour120622b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1276244"/><media:description type="plain">Is Our Democracy Safe? 
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/12/ManuelBalceCeneta.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>30:37</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>This year’s midterm elections were widely seen as a victory for democracy in the United States. Election deniers were defeated in many closely watched races and voting proceeded smoothly, even in areas where the Big Lie has taken a firm hold. But the threat of authoritarianism remains strong. David Remnick talks with Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, authors of the best-seller “How Democracies Die” about recent political trends. “You can’t really live in a functioning democracy if you feel like each election is a national emergency,” Ziblatt says. “Because what it means is that we’re not confronting the major problems confronting our society.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Is Our Democracy Safe?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>This year’s midterm elections were widely seen as a victory for democracy in the United States. Election deniers were defeated in many closely watched races and voting proceeded smoothly, even in areas where the Big Lie has taken a firm hold. But the threat of authoritarianism remains strong. David Remnick talks with Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, authors of the best-seller “How Democracies Die” about recent political trends. “You can’t really live in a functioning democracy if you feel like each election is a national emergency,” Ziblatt says. “Because what it means is that we’re not confronting the major problems confronting our society.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>This year’s midterm elections were widely seen as a victory for democracy in the United States. Election deniers were defeated in many closely watched races and voting proceeded smoothly, even in areas where the Big Lie has taken a firm hold. But the threat of authoritarianism remains strong. David Remnick talks with Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, authors of the best-seller “How Democracies Die” about recent political trends. “You can’t really live in a functioning democracy if you feel like each election is a national emergency,” Ziblatt says. “Because what it means is that we’re not confronting the major problems confronting our society.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Supreme Court Case That Could Upend Elections
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/supreme-court-case-could-upend-elections-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;J. Michael Luttig is a retired judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals and a prominent legal mind in conservative circles, close with figures including Clarence Thomas and William Barr. On January 5, 2020, he got a call from Vice-President Mike Pence’s then-lawyer asking Luttig to publicly back Pence’s decision not to attempt to overturn the election the next day. Luttig tweeted that the Vice-President had no constitutional authority to stop the election, and suddenly the judge was thrust into the center of the crisis.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Now Luttig is siding with Democrats as co-counsel on the Supreme Court case Moore v. Harper, which he tells David Remnick is “the most important case, since the founding, for American democracy.” At the heart of the debate is the independent-state-legislature theory, a once-fringe legal concept that Donald Trump and his allies believe should have allowed Pence to reject the popular vote in 2020. If the court adopts the theory, it could grant legislatures essentially unfettered authority to run national elections; they could not be challenged even if the election violated the state constitution. Such power, in the hands of a gerrymandered legislature, could be used to bypass the popular vote and appoint a new slate of electors, effectively empowering state lawmakers to choose a winner. The court will hear the case on December 7th.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">641e539f-3a33-46b0-9590-d3ffc10eeddc</guid><enclosure length="19408000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour120222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1276241"/><category>authoritarianism</category><category>constitution</category><category>democracy</category><category>election</category><category>government</category><category>politics</category><category>supreme_court</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour120222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1276241"/><media:description type="plain">The Supreme Court Case That Could Upend Elections
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/12/NYRH_GavelBallotBox.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>20:13</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. Michael Luttig is a retired judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals and a prominent legal mind in conservative circles, close with figures including Clarence Thomas and William Barr. On January 5, 2020, he got a call from Vice-President Mike Pence’s then-lawyer asking Luttig to publicly back Pence’s decision not to attempt to overturn the election the next day. Luttig tweeted that the Vice-President had no constitutional authority to stop the election, and suddenly the judge was thrust into the center of the crisis.</p>
<p>Now Luttig is siding with Democrats as co-counsel on the Supreme Court case Moore v. Harper, which he tells David Remnick is “the most important case, since the founding, for American democracy.” At the heart of the debate is the independent-state-legislature theory, a once-fringe legal concept that Donald Trump and his allies believe should have allowed Pence to reject the popular vote in 2020. If the court adopts the theory, it could grant legislatures essentially unfettered authority to run national elections; they could not be challenged even if the election violated the state constitution. Such power, in the hands of a gerrymandered legislature, could be used to bypass the popular vote and appoint a new slate of electors, effectively empowering state lawmakers to choose a winner. The court will hear the case on December 7th.</p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Supreme Court Case That Could Upend Elections</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>J. Michael Luttig is a retired judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals and a prominent legal mind in conservative circles, close with figures including Clarence Thomas and William Barr. On January 5, 2020, he got a call from Vice-President Mike Pence’s then-lawyer asking Luttig to publicly back Pence’s decision not to attempt to overturn the election the next day. Luttig tweeted that the Vice-President had no constitutional authority to stop the election, and suddenly the judge was thrust into the center of the crisis.</p>
<p>Now Luttig is siding with Democrats as co-counsel on the Supreme Court case Moore v. Harper, which he tells David Remnick is “the most important case, since the founding, for American democracy.” At the heart of the debate is the independent-state-legislature theory, a once-fringe legal concept that Donald Trump and his allies believe should have allowed Pence to reject the popular vote in 2020. If the court adopts the theory, it could grant legislatures essentially unfettered authority to run national elections; they could not be challenged even if the election violated the state constitution. Such power, in the hands of a gerrymandered legislature, could be used to bypass the popular vote and appoint a new slate of electors, effectively empowering state lawmakers to choose a winner. The court will hear the case on December 7th.</p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>J. Michael Luttig is a retired judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals and a prominent legal mind in conservative circles, close with figures including Clarence Thomas and William Barr. On January 5, 2020, he got a call from Vice-President Mike Pence’s then-lawyer asking Luttig to publicly back Pence’s decision not to attempt to overturn the election the next day. Luttig tweeted that the Vice-President had no constitutional authority to stop the election, and suddenly the judge was thrust into the center of the crisis. Now Luttig is siding with Democrats as co-counsel on the Supreme Court case Moore v. Harper, which he tells David Remnick is “the most important case, since the founding, for American democracy.” At the heart of the debate is the independent-state-legislature theory, a once-fringe legal concept that Donald Trump and his allies believe should have allowed Pence to reject the popular vote in 2020. If the court adopts the theory, it could grant legislatures essentially unfettered authority to run national elections; they could not be challenged even if the election violated the state constitution. Such power, in the hands of a gerrymandered legislature, could be used to bypass the popular vote and appoint a new slate of electors, effectively empowering state lawmakers to choose a winner. The court will hear the case on December 7th.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Why Christine Baranski Fought the Good Fight
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/why-christine-baranski-fought-good-fight/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The veteran stage and screen actress Christine Baranski first became a household name thanks to her Emmy-winning turn on the nineties sitcom “Cybill,” and her Tony-award winning work on Broadway. But “The Good Fight” took her to another level. As Diane Lockhart, a Chicago attorney and diehard liberal, Baranski captured the tensions of the political moment of Donald Trump, and the show ended its run this month. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/emily-nussbaum"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Emily Nussbaum&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; could barely contain her excitement when sat down with Baranski at The New Yorker Festival in 2018 for a wide-ranging conversation about Baranski’s career and the timeliness of “The Good Fight.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;em&gt;This segment originally aired April 12, 2019.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d04447e9-7604-4edc-9896-92a27b3f001e</guid><enclosure length="17552000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour112922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1272685"/><category>arts</category><category>christine_baranski</category><category>doreen_st_felix</category><category>new_yorker_festival</category><category>television</category><category>the_good_fight</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour112922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1272685"/><media:description type="plain">Why Christine Baranski Fought the Good Fight
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2019/04/AP_18197809463604.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>18:17</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The veteran stage and screen actress Christine Baranski first became a household name thanks to her Emmy-winning turn on the nineties sitcom “Cybill,” and her Tony-award winning work on Broadway. But “The Good Fight” took her to another level. As Diane Lockhart, a Chicago attorney and diehard liberal, Baranski captured the tensions of the political moment of Donald Trump, and the show ended its run this month. </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/emily-nussbaum"><span>Emily Nussbaum</span></a><span> could barely contain her excitement when sat down with Baranski at The New Yorker Festival in 2018 for a wide-ranging conversation about Baranski’s career and the timeliness of “The Good Fight.” </span></p>
<p><span><i>This segment originally aired April 12, 2019.</i></span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Why Christine Baranski Fought the Good Fight</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The veteran stage and screen actress Christine Baranski first became a household name thanks to her Emmy-winning turn on the nineties sitcom “Cybill,” and her Tony-award winning work on Broadway. But “The Good Fight” took her to another level. As Diane Lockhart, a Chicago attorney and diehard liberal, Baranski captured the tensions of the political moment of Donald Trump, and the show ended its run this month. </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/emily-nussbaum"><span>Emily Nussbaum</span></a><span> could barely contain her excitement when sat down with Baranski at The New Yorker Festival in 2018 for a wide-ranging conversation about Baranski’s career and the timeliness of “The Good Fight.” </span></p>
<p><span><i>This segment originally aired April 12, 2019.</i></span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The veteran stage and screen actress Christine Baranski first became a household name thanks to her Emmy-winning turn on the nineties sitcom “Cybill,” and her Tony-award winning work on Broadway. But “The Good Fight” took her to another level. As Diane Lockhart, a Chicago attorney and diehard liberal, Baranski captured the tensions of the political moment of Donald Trump, and the show ended its run this month. Emily Nussbaum could barely contain her excitement when sat down with Baranski at The New Yorker Festival in 2018 for a wide-ranging conversation about Baranski’s career and the timeliness of “The Good Fight.” This segment originally aired April 12, 2019.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Quinta Brunson, a “Child of the Internet,” Revives the Sitcom
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/quinta-brunson-child-internet-revives-sitcom-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Quinta Brunson made a name for herself as a master of meme comedy and is a self-described “child of the Internet,” yet her ABC mockumentary series “Abbott Elementary” is an unabashed throwback to the sitcoms of her youth. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/doreen-st-felix"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Doreen St. Félix&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; talked with Brunson at the 2022 New Yorker Festival about her influences and the everyday comedy of the workplace. St. Félix believes that Brunson has found “freedom in formula” when it comes to “Abbott,” which documents the lives of the beleaguered staff at a Philadelphia public school. “There is nothing that I could do,” Brunson says, “or [that] anyone can do that is more triumphant than someone going to their shitty job.” Writing in the wake of shows like “Black-ish,” Brunson relishes being able to center her story on Black people without addressing topical issues about race; the school is its own self-enclosed world. Just surviving, she thinks, provides its own form of liberation. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;“&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;So much has happened to Black people,” she says. “Why are we still here? . . . We really could have called it quits a long time ago, and somehow we just keep going. It’s crazy to me.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b7661725-8e2f-4c12-8657-78db9bb8267a</guid><enclosure length="30720000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour112522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1272683"/><category>abbott_elementary</category><category>arts</category><category>comedy</category><category>quinta_brunson</category><category>sitcom</category><category>television</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour112522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1272683"/><media:description type="plain">Quinta Brunson, a “Child of the Internet,” Revives the Sitcom
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/11/thumbnail_TNY_final.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>32:00</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Quinta Brunson made a name for herself as a master of meme comedy and is a self-described “child of the Internet,” yet her ABC mockumentary series “Abbott Elementary” is an unabashed throwback to the sitcoms of her youth. </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/doreen-st-felix"><span>Doreen St. Félix</span></a><span> talked with Brunson at the 2022 New Yorker Festival about her influences and the everyday comedy of the workplace. St. Félix believes that Brunson has found “freedom in formula” when it comes to “Abbott,” which documents the lives of the beleaguered staff at a Philadelphia public school. “There is nothing that I could do,” Brunson says, “or [that] anyone can do that is more triumphant than someone going to their shitty job.” Writing in the wake of shows like “Black-ish,” Brunson relishes being able to center her story on Black people without addressing topical issues about race; the school is its own self-enclosed world. Just surviving, she thinks, provides its own form of liberation. </span><span>“</span><span>So much has happened to Black people,” she says. “Why are we still here? . . . We really could have called it quits a long time ago, and somehow we just keep going. It’s crazy to me.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Quinta Brunson, a “Child of the Internet,” Revives the Sitcom</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Quinta Brunson made a name for herself as a master of meme comedy and is a self-described “child of the Internet,” yet her ABC mockumentary series “Abbott Elementary” is an unabashed throwback to the sitcoms of her youth. </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/doreen-st-felix"><span>Doreen St. Félix</span></a><span> talked with Brunson at the 2022 New Yorker Festival about her influences and the everyday comedy of the workplace. St. Félix believes that Brunson has found “freedom in formula” when it comes to “Abbott,” which documents the lives of the beleaguered staff at a Philadelphia public school. “There is nothing that I could do,” Brunson says, “or [that] anyone can do that is more triumphant than someone going to their shitty job.” Writing in the wake of shows like “Black-ish,” Brunson relishes being able to center her story on Black people without addressing topical issues about race; the school is its own self-enclosed world. Just surviving, she thinks, provides its own form of liberation. </span><span>“</span><span>So much has happened to Black people,” she says. “Why are we still here? . . . We really could have called it quits a long time ago, and somehow we just keep going. It’s crazy to me.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Quinta Brunson made a name for herself as a master of meme comedy and is a self-described “child of the Internet,” yet her ABC mockumentary series “Abbott Elementary” is an unabashed throwback to the sitcoms of her youth. Doreen St. Félix talked with Brunson at the 2022 New Yorker Festival about her influences and the everyday comedy of the workplace. St. Félix believes that Brunson has found “freedom in formula” when it comes to “Abbott,” which documents the lives of the beleaguered staff at a Philadelphia public school. “There is nothing that I could do,” Brunson says, “or [that] anyone can do that is more triumphant than someone going to their shitty job.” Writing in the wake of shows like “Black-ish,” Brunson relishes being able to center her story on Black people without addressing topical issues about race; the school is its own self-enclosed world. Just surviving, she thinks, provides its own form of liberation. “So much has happened to Black people,” she says. “Why are we still here? . . . We really could have called it quits a long time ago, and somehow we just keep going. It’s crazy to me.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Unpacking the Latino Vote, and Susan Orlean on the Queen of Tigers
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/unpacking-latino-vote-and-susan-orlean-queen-tigers-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In the lead-up to this year’s midterm elections, many pundits expected Republicans to make significant gains among &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-political-scene/there-is-no-one-story-about-latino-voters"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Latino voters&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, further eroding a base of support that Democrats have arguably taken for granted for decades. “What happened instead, as you know, is a more complicated story,” the contributing writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/stephania-taladrid"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Stephania Taladrid&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; says, one that both parties will be examining closely as 2024 approaches. Taladrid speaks with two political consultants, Chuck Rocha and Mike Madrid, to unpack the results. Rocha and Madrid co-host “The Latino Vote” podcast. Rocha, a Democrat, was a senior adviser to &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/10/12/the-populist-prophet"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Bernie Sanders&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; and Madrid, a Republican, was a founding member of the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/10/12/inside-the-lincoln-projects-war-against-trump"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Lincoln Project&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;And &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/susan-orlean"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Susan Orlean&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; reads from one of her &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/afterword"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Afterword&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; columns, about the long and fecund life of a tiger mother. “Unlike most tiger mothers,” she writes, “Collarwali was, in fact, a tiger.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2b4a5219-2da9-476f-915c-8fe72dba91cc</guid><enclosure length="27328000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour112222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1272641"/><category>animals</category><category>election</category><category>latino</category><category>latino_vote</category><category>midterms</category><category>midterms_2022</category><category>politics</category><category>tiger</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour112222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1272641"/><media:description type="plain">Unpacking the Latino Vote, and Susan Orlean on the Queen of Tigers
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/11/AP22309792474375.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>28:28</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>In the lead-up to this year’s midterm elections, many pundits expected Republicans to make significant gains among </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-political-scene/there-is-no-one-story-about-latino-voters"><span>Latino voters</span></a><span>, further eroding a base of support that Democrats have arguably taken for granted for decades. “What happened instead, as you know, is a more complicated story,” the contributing writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/stephania-taladrid"><span>Stephania Taladrid</span></a><span> says, one that both parties will be examining closely as 2024 approaches. Taladrid speaks with two political consultants, Chuck Rocha and Mike Madrid, to unpack the results. Rocha and Madrid co-host “The Latino Vote” podcast. Rocha, a Democrat, was a senior adviser to </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/10/12/the-populist-prophet"><span>Bernie Sanders</span></a><span> and Madrid, a Republican, was a founding member of the </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/10/12/inside-the-lincoln-projects-war-against-trump"><span>Lincoln Project</span></a><span>. </span></p>
<p><span>And </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/susan-orlean"><span>Susan Orlean</span></a><span> reads from one of her </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/afterword"><span>Afterword</span></a><span> columns, about the long and fecund life of a tiger mother. “Unlike most tiger mothers,” she writes, “Collarwali was, in fact, a tiger.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Unpacking the Latino Vote, and Susan Orlean on the Queen of Tigers</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>In the lead-up to this year’s midterm elections, many pundits expected Republicans to make significant gains among </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-political-scene/there-is-no-one-story-about-latino-voters"><span>Latino voters</span></a><span>, further eroding a base of support that Democrats have arguably taken for granted for decades. “What happened instead, as you know, is a more complicated story,” the contributing writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/stephania-taladrid"><span>Stephania Taladrid</span></a><span> says, one that both parties will be examining closely as 2024 approaches. Taladrid speaks with two political consultants, Chuck Rocha and Mike Madrid, to unpack the results. Rocha and Madrid co-host “The Latino Vote” podcast. Rocha, a Democrat, was a senior adviser to </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/10/12/the-populist-prophet"><span>Bernie Sanders</span></a><span> and Madrid, a Republican, was a founding member of the </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/10/12/inside-the-lincoln-projects-war-against-trump"><span>Lincoln Project</span></a><span>. </span></p>
<p><span>And </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/susan-orlean"><span>Susan Orlean</span></a><span> reads from one of her </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/afterword"><span>Afterword</span></a><span> columns, about the long and fecund life of a tiger mother. “Unlike most tiger mothers,” she writes, “Collarwali was, in fact, a tiger.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>In the lead-up to this year’s midterm elections, many pundits expected Republicans to make significant gains among Latino voters, further eroding a base of support that Democrats have arguably taken for granted for decades. “What happened instead, as you know, is a more complicated story,” the contributing writer Stephania Taladrid says, one that both parties will be examining closely as 2024 approaches. Taladrid speaks with two political consultants, Chuck Rocha and Mike Madrid, to unpack the results. Rocha and Madrid co-host “The Latino Vote” podcast. Rocha, a Democrat, was a senior adviser to Bernie Sanders and Madrid, a Republican, was a founding member of the Lincoln Project.  And Susan Orlean reads from one of her Afterword columns, about the long and fecund life of a tiger mother. “Unlike most tiger mothers,” she writes, “Collarwali was, in fact, a tiger.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Stories of #MeToo
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/stories-metoo-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Five years ago, reporting on the film producer Harvey Weinstein’s history of assault and misconduct opened the floodgates of the national reckoning with gender and power known as #MeToo. Three &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; critics—&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/alexandra-schwartz"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Alexandra Schwartz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/naomi-fry"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Naomi Fry&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/vinson-cunningham"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Vinson Cunningham&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;—recently gathered to assess #MeToo’s impact on the culture more broadly. They discussed works like the new film “Tár,” the movie “The Assistant,” the fiction pieces “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/books/novellas/this-is-pleasure"&gt;&lt;span&gt;This Is Pleasure&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;” and “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/11/cat-person"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Cat Person&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;,” and more. Schwartz notes that #MeToo is not only an event in time but also a lens through which to tell stories about interpersonal relationships that have long been taken for granted.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">bb4d0ae1-0656-4842-8db3-4b7c5b83ead3</guid><enclosure length="37840000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour112122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1272701"/><category>harvey_weinstein</category><category>life</category><category>metoo</category><category>metoo_movement</category><category>politics</category><category>social_justice</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour112122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1272701"/><media:description type="plain">The Stories of #MeToo
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/09/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>39:25</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Five years ago, reporting on the film producer Harvey Weinstein’s history of assault and misconduct opened the floodgates of the national reckoning with gender and power known as #MeToo. Three </span><i><span>New Yorker</span></i><span> critics—</span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/alexandra-schwartz"><span>Alexandra Schwartz</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/naomi-fry"><span>Naomi Fry</span></a><span>, and </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/vinson-cunningham"><span>Vinson Cunningham</span></a><span>—recently gathered to assess #MeToo’s impact on the culture more broadly. They discussed works like the new film “Tár,” the movie “The Assistant,” the fiction pieces “</span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/books/novellas/this-is-pleasure"><span>This Is Pleasure</span></a><span>” and “</span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/11/cat-person"><span>Cat Person</span></a><span>,” and more. Schwartz notes that #MeToo is not only an event in time but also a lens through which to tell stories about interpersonal relationships that have long been taken for granted.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Stories of #MeToo</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Five years ago, reporting on the film producer Harvey Weinstein’s history of assault and misconduct opened the floodgates of the national reckoning with gender and power known as #MeToo. Three </span><i><span>New Yorker</span></i><span> critics—</span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/alexandra-schwartz"><span>Alexandra Schwartz</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/naomi-fry"><span>Naomi Fry</span></a><span>, and </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/vinson-cunningham"><span>Vinson Cunningham</span></a><span>—recently gathered to assess #MeToo’s impact on the culture more broadly. They discussed works like the new film “Tár,” the movie “The Assistant,” the fiction pieces “</span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/books/novellas/this-is-pleasure"><span>This Is Pleasure</span></a><span>” and “</span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/11/cat-person"><span>Cat Person</span></a><span>,” and more. Schwartz notes that #MeToo is not only an event in time but also a lens through which to tell stories about interpersonal relationships that have long been taken for granted.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Five years ago, reporting on the film producer Harvey Weinstein’s history of assault and misconduct opened the floodgates of the national reckoning with gender and power known as #MeToo. Three New Yorker critics—Alexandra Schwartz, Naomi Fry, and Vinson Cunningham—recently gathered to assess #MeToo’s impact on the culture more broadly. They discussed works like the new film “Tár,” the movie “The Assistant,” the fiction pieces “This Is Pleasure” and “Cat Person,” and more. Schwartz notes that #MeToo is not only an event in time but also a lens through which to tell stories about interpersonal relationships that have long been taken for granted.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>How Qatar Took the World Cup
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/how-qatar-took-world-cup-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;No self-respecting sports fan is naïve about the role that money plays in pro sports. But, by any standard, the greed and cynicism behind the World Cup are extraordinary. The cloud of scandal surrounding FIFA, the international soccer organization, has led to indictments and arrests on charges of wire fraud, racketeering, and money laundering around the globe. Headlines have been filled with reports of the deaths of workers who constructed the facilities. “People are normally careful enough not to leave a paper trail,” the contributor &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/heidi-blake"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Heidi Blake&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; notes. But she says, of investigating FIFA, “I’ve never seen graft and corruption documented in this kind of detail.” Blake speaks with David Remnick about “The Ugly Game,” which she co-authored with Jonathan Calvert, and how Qatar came to host the World Cup. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">caf33726-cf6f-456e-8a02-811f8cf9d830</guid><enclosure length="21088000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour111822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1272640"/><category>fifa</category><category>fifa_corruption</category><category>fifa_world_cup</category><category>qatar</category><category>soccer</category><category>sports</category><category>world_cup</category><category>world_cup_2022</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour111822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1272640"/><media:description type="plain">How Qatar Took the World Cup
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/11/NYRH_WorldCup.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>21:58</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No self-respecting sports fan is naïve about the role that money plays in pro sports. But, by any standard, the greed and cynicism behind the World Cup are extraordinary. The cloud of scandal surrounding FIFA, the international soccer organization, has led to indictments and arrests on charges of wire fraud, racketeering, and money laundering around the globe. Headlines have been filled with reports of the deaths of workers who constructed the facilities. “People are normally careful enough not to leave a paper trail,” the contributor <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/heidi-blake">Heidi Blake</a> notes. But she says, of investigating FIFA, “I’ve never seen graft and corruption documented in this kind of detail.” Blake speaks with David Remnick about “The Ugly Game,” which she co-authored with Jonathan Calvert, and how Qatar came to host the World Cup. </p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>How Qatar Took the World Cup</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>No self-respecting sports fan is naïve about the role that money plays in pro sports. But, by any standard, the greed and cynicism behind the World Cup are extraordinary. The cloud of scandal surrounding FIFA, the international soccer organization, has led to indictments and arrests on charges of wire fraud, racketeering, and money laundering around the globe. Headlines have been filled with reports of the deaths of workers who constructed the facilities. “People are normally careful enough not to leave a paper trail,” the contributor <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/heidi-blake">Heidi Blake</a> notes. But she says, of investigating FIFA, “I’ve never seen graft and corruption documented in this kind of detail.” Blake speaks with David Remnick about “The Ugly Game,” which she co-authored with Jonathan Calvert, and how Qatar came to host the World Cup. </p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>No self-respecting sports fan is naïve about the role that money plays in pro sports. But, by any standard, the greed and cynicism behind the World Cup are extraordinary. The cloud of scandal surrounding FIFA, the international soccer organization, has led to indictments and arrests on charges of wire fraud, racketeering, and money laundering around the globe. Headlines have been filled with reports of the deaths of workers who constructed the facilities. “People are normally careful enough not to leave a paper trail,” the contributor Heidi Blake notes. But she says, of investigating FIFA, “I’ve never seen graft and corruption documented in this kind of detail.” Blake speaks with David Remnick about “The Ugly Game,” which she co-authored with Jonathan Calvert, and how Qatar came to host the World Cup.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Safia Elhillo on Vulnerability and Anger in “Girls That Never Die”
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/safia-elhillo-vulnerability-and-anger-girls-never-die-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The poet Safia Elhillo first found her voice onstage, performing in youth poetry slams in Washington, D.C., where she grew up, the child of Sudanese immigrants. She published her first collection in 2017, and in 2021 her novel in verse, “Home Is Not a Country,” was long-listed for the National Book Award. She’s now out with a new collection, “Girls That Never Die,” which she characterizes as her most personal and vulnerable work yet. It responds to some of the backlash she received online after her earlier work was published. “Before this book, I think I had really clear rules for myself about what I was and was not allowed to write poetry about. And my body was one of the things that I was not allowed to write poetry about,” Elhillo tells &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/dana-goodyear"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Dana Goodyear&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. “I think I really had to sit down and dismantle this idea that if I was polite enough, respectful enough, modest enough, quiet enough, silent enough—that nobody would ever want to do me harm.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">87324e84-174a-47df-b1d0-d6ad12f98ec3</guid><enclosure length="0" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour111522_podcastb.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1270038"/><category>arts</category><category>books</category><category>poet</category><category>poetry</category><category>safia_elhillo</category><category>sudanese_american</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour111522_podcastb.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1270038"/><media:description type="plain">Safia Elhillo on Vulnerability and Anger in “Girls That Never Die”
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/11/Safia_Elhillo.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The poet Safia Elhillo first found her voice onstage, performing in youth poetry slams in Washington, D.C., where she grew up, the child of Sudanese immigrants. She published her first collection in 2017, and in 2021 her novel in verse, “Home Is Not a Country,” was long-listed for the National Book Award. She’s now out with a new collection, “Girls That Never Die,” which she characterizes as her most personal and vulnerable work yet. It responds to some of the backlash she received online after her earlier work was published. “Before this book, I think I had really clear rules for myself about what I was and was not allowed to write poetry about. And my body was one of the things that I was not allowed to write poetry about,” Elhillo tells </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/dana-goodyear"><span>Dana Goodyear</span></a><span>. “I think I really had to sit down and dismantle this idea that if I was polite enough, respectful enough, modest enough, quiet enough, silent enough—that nobody would ever want to do me harm.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Safia Elhillo on Vulnerability and Anger in “Girls That Never Die”</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The poet Safia Elhillo first found her voice onstage, performing in youth poetry slams in Washington, D.C., where she grew up, the child of Sudanese immigrants. She published her first collection in 2017, and in 2021 her novel in verse, “Home Is Not a Country,” was long-listed for the National Book Award. She’s now out with a new collection, “Girls That Never Die,” which she characterizes as her most personal and vulnerable work yet. It responds to some of the backlash she received online after her earlier work was published. “Before this book, I think I had really clear rules for myself about what I was and was not allowed to write poetry about. And my body was one of the things that I was not allowed to write poetry about,” Elhillo tells </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/dana-goodyear"><span>Dana Goodyear</span></a><span>. “I think I really had to sit down and dismantle this idea that if I was polite enough, respectful enough, modest enough, quiet enough, silent enough—that nobody would ever want to do me harm.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The poet Safia Elhillo first found her voice onstage, performing in youth poetry slams in Washington, D.C., where she grew up, the child of Sudanese immigrants. She published her first collection in 2017, and in 2021 her novel in verse, “Home Is Not a Country,” was long-listed for the National Book Award. She’s now out with a new collection, “Girls That Never Die,” which she characterizes as her most personal and vulnerable work yet. It responds to some of the backlash she received online after her earlier work was published. “Before this book, I think I had really clear rules for myself about what I was and was not allowed to write poetry about. And my body was one of the things that I was not allowed to write poetry about,” Elhillo tells Dana Goodyear. “I think I really had to sit down and dismantle this idea that if I was polite enough, respectful enough, modest enough, quiet enough, silent enough—that nobody would ever want to do me harm.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Man Who Escaped from Auschwitz to Warn the World
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/man-who-escaped-auschwitz-warn-world-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Rudolf Vrba was sent to Auschwitz at the age of seventeen, and, because he was young and in good health, he was not killed immediately but put to labor in the camp. Vrba (originally named Walter Rosenberg) quickly discovered that the scale of the killing was greater than anyone on the outside knew or could imagine, and Jewish communities were being deported without understanding their fate. Jonathan Freedland chronicles Vrba’s story in his new book, “The Escape Artist.” The young Vrba had a “crucial realization, which is [that] the only way this machine is going to be stopped—this death machine—is if somebody gets the word out,” Freedland told David Remnick. Freedland recounts how, against terrible odds, Vrba managed to escape the camp, and provided direct testimony of the Holocaust that reached Allied governments.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;em&gt;This interview was recorded at a live event at the Museum of Jewish Heritage—A Living Memorial to the Holocaust. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b95bb341-8e37-41ca-a2dd-e96fdc862842</guid><enclosure length="33536000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour111122_podcastuse.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1270034"/><category>auschwitz</category><category>author</category><category>books</category><category>history</category><category>holocaust</category><category>jewish_history</category><category>jonathan_freedland</category><category>politics</category><category>rudolf_vrba</category><category>war</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour111122_podcastuse.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1270034"/><media:description type="plain">The Man Who Escaped from Auschwitz to Warn the World
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/11/NYRH_Auschwitz_az0D0T0.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>34:56</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Rudolf Vrba was sent to Auschwitz at the age of seventeen, and, because he was young and in good health, he was not killed immediately but put to labor in the camp. Vrba (originally named Walter Rosenberg) quickly discovered that the scale of the killing was greater than anyone on the outside knew or could imagine, and Jewish communities were being deported without understanding their fate. Jonathan Freedland chronicles Vrba’s story in his new book, “The Escape Artist.” The young Vrba had a “crucial realization, which is [that] the only way this machine is going to be stopped—this death machine—is if somebody gets the word out,” Freedland told David Remnick. Freedland recounts how, against terrible odds, Vrba managed to escape the camp, and provided direct testimony of the Holocaust that reached Allied governments.</span></p>
<p><span><i>This interview was recorded at a live event at the Museum of Jewish Heritage—A Living Memorial to the Holocaust. </i></span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Man Who Escaped from Auschwitz to Warn the World</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Rudolf Vrba was sent to Auschwitz at the age of seventeen, and, because he was young and in good health, he was not killed immediately but put to labor in the camp. Vrba (originally named Walter Rosenberg) quickly discovered that the scale of the killing was greater than anyone on the outside knew or could imagine, and Jewish communities were being deported without understanding their fate. Jonathan Freedland chronicles Vrba’s story in his new book, “The Escape Artist.” The young Vrba had a “crucial realization, which is [that] the only way this machine is going to be stopped—this death machine—is if somebody gets the word out,” Freedland told David Remnick. Freedland recounts how, against terrible odds, Vrba managed to escape the camp, and provided direct testimony of the Holocaust that reached Allied governments.</span></p>
<p><span><i>This interview was recorded at a live event at the Museum of Jewish Heritage—A Living Memorial to the Holocaust. </i></span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Rudolf Vrba was sent to Auschwitz at the age of seventeen, and, because he was young and in good health, he was not killed immediately but put to labor in the camp. Vrba (originally named Walter Rosenberg) quickly discovered that the scale of the killing was greater than anyone on the outside knew or could imagine, and Jewish communities were being deported without understanding their fate. Jonathan Freedland chronicles Vrba’s story in his new book, “The Escape Artist.” The young Vrba had a “crucial realization, which is [that] the only way this machine is going to be stopped—this death machine—is if somebody gets the word out,” Freedland told David Remnick. Freedland recounts how, against terrible odds, Vrba managed to escape the camp, and provided direct testimony of the Holocaust that reached Allied governments. This interview was recorded at a live event at the Museum of Jewish Heritage—A Living Memorial to the Holocaust.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Mike White on the New Season of “The White Lotus” in Sicily
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/mike-white-new-season-white-lotus-sicily/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The first season of “The White Lotus” won ten Emmy Awards and was a critics’ favorite. A dark satire of the privileged, the show chronicled the visit to a luxurious Hawaiian resort of a tech mogul and her family, a pair of newlyweds, and a single woman—all having the worst time of their lives—while the hotel manager goes off the wagon in a way both hilarious and harrowing. In Season 2, creator Mike White has moved the action to Sicily, and is focussing on gender roles and masculinity. White speaks with the staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/naomi-fry"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Naomi Fry&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; about his upbringing as the child of a minister, in a modest family in a wealthy community. “I hope that I’m not writing this show for the rest of my career,” White says. “But it does feel like, if you’re taking a snapshot, I am being true to the things that I’m thinking about right now.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2022 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">695b246a-df9c-42ab-82d2-cb1f9eaad279</guid><enclosure length="18192000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour110822b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1268037"/><category>arts</category><category>comedy</category><category>gender</category><category>masculinity</category><category>privilege</category><category>satire</category><category>sicily</category><category>television</category><category>the_white_lotus</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour110822b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1268037"/><media:description type="plain">Mike White on the New Season of “The White Lotus” in Sicily
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/11/WhiteLotus.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>18:57</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The first season of “The White Lotus” won ten Emmy Awards and was a critics’ favorite. A dark satire of the privileged, the show chronicled the visit to a luxurious Hawaiian resort of a tech mogul and her family, a pair of newlyweds, and a single woman—all having the worst time of their lives—while the hotel manager goes off the wagon in a way both hilarious and harrowing. In Season 2, creator Mike White has moved the action to Sicily, and is focussing on gender roles and masculinity. White speaks with the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/naomi-fry"><span>Naomi Fry</span></a><span> about his upbringing as the child of a minister, in a modest family in a wealthy community. “I hope that I’m not writing this show for the rest of my career,” White says. “But it does feel like, if you’re taking a snapshot, I am being true to the things that I’m thinking about right now.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Mike White on the New Season of “The White Lotus” in Sicily</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The first season of “The White Lotus” won ten Emmy Awards and was a critics’ favorite. A dark satire of the privileged, the show chronicled the visit to a luxurious Hawaiian resort of a tech mogul and her family, a pair of newlyweds, and a single woman—all having the worst time of their lives—while the hotel manager goes off the wagon in a way both hilarious and harrowing. In Season 2, creator Mike White has moved the action to Sicily, and is focussing on gender roles and masculinity. White speaks with the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/naomi-fry"><span>Naomi Fry</span></a><span> about his upbringing as the child of a minister, in a modest family in a wealthy community. “I hope that I’m not writing this show for the rest of my career,” White says. “But it does feel like, if you’re taking a snapshot, I am being true to the things that I’m thinking about right now.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The first season of “The White Lotus” won ten Emmy Awards and was a critics’ favorite. A dark satire of the privileged, the show chronicled the visit to a luxurious Hawaiian resort of a tech mogul and her family, a pair of newlyweds, and a single woman—all having the worst time of their lives—while the hotel manager goes off the wagon in a way both hilarious and harrowing. In Season 2, creator Mike White has moved the action to Sicily, and is focussing on gender roles and masculinity. White speaks with the staff writer Naomi Fry about his upbringing as the child of a minister, in a modest family in a wealthy community. “I hope that I’m not writing this show for the rest of my career,” White says. “But it does feel like, if you’re taking a snapshot, I am being true to the things that I’m thinking about right now.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Russell Moore on Christian Nationalism
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/russell-moore-christian-nationalism-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Russell Moore, a prominent figure in the Southern Baptist Convention, resigned over the church’s response to racism—which Moore considers a sin—and documented sexual abuse allegations. The theologian sits down with David Remnick to reflect on the intersection of Christianity and American politics. “Jesus always refused to have his gospel used as a means to an end,” Moore says. “People who settle for Christianity or any other religion as politics are really making a pitiful deal.” Plus, the contributing writer Eliza Griswold reports on an energized movement of Christian nationalists aiming for statewide power in Pennsylvania. They believe that the authority to rule comes from God, not from a plurality of voters. “This isn’t about injecting Christian values into society,” Griswold notes, “this is about overthrowing secular democracy.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9cb9ce0-164c-405b-a8b9-9734763351b3</guid><enclosure length="29632000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour110422b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1268033"/><category>christianity</category><category>election</category><category>midterm_2022</category><category>pennsylvania</category><category>politics</category><category>religion_faith</category><category>social_justice</category><category>southern_baptist_convention</category><category>theology</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour110422b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1268033"/><media:description type="plain">Russell Moore on Christian Nationalism
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/11/NYRH_RussellMoore.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>30:52</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Russell Moore, a prominent figure in the Southern Baptist Convention, resigned over the church’s response to racism—which Moore considers a sin—and documented sexual abuse allegations. The theologian sits down with David Remnick to reflect on the intersection of Christianity and American politics. “Jesus always refused to have his gospel used as a means to an end,” Moore says. “People who settle for Christianity or any other religion as politics are really making a pitiful deal.” Plus, the contributing writer Eliza Griswold reports on an energized movement of Christian nationalists aiming for statewide power in Pennsylvania. They believe that the authority to rule comes from God, not from a plurality of voters. “This isn’t about injecting Christian values into society,” Griswold notes, “this is about overthrowing secular democracy.” </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Russell Moore on Christian Nationalism</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Russell Moore, a prominent figure in the Southern Baptist Convention, resigned over the church’s response to racism—which Moore considers a sin—and documented sexual abuse allegations. The theologian sits down with David Remnick to reflect on the intersection of Christianity and American politics. “Jesus always refused to have his gospel used as a means to an end,” Moore says. “People who settle for Christianity or any other religion as politics are really making a pitiful deal.” Plus, the contributing writer Eliza Griswold reports on an energized movement of Christian nationalists aiming for statewide power in Pennsylvania. They believe that the authority to rule comes from God, not from a plurality of voters. “This isn’t about injecting Christian values into society,” Griswold notes, “this is about overthrowing secular democracy.” </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Russell Moore, a prominent figure in the Southern Baptist Convention, resigned over the church’s response to racism—which Moore considers a sin—and documented sexual abuse allegations. The theologian sits down with David Remnick to reflect on the intersection of Christianity and American politics. “Jesus always refused to have his gospel used as a means to an end,” Moore says. “People who settle for Christianity or any other religion as politics are really making a pitiful deal.” Plus, the contributing writer Eliza Griswold reports on an energized movement of Christian nationalists aiming for statewide power in Pennsylvania. They believe that the authority to rule comes from God, not from a plurality of voters. “This isn’t about injecting Christian values into society,” Griswold notes, “this is about overthrowing secular democracy.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Mayor Francis Suarez’s View from Miami
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/mayor-francis-suarezs-view-miami/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Francis Suarez, the Republican mayor of Miami, is popular in the city he governs, and increasingly prominent beyond it. Conservative voices as disparate as Kanye West and George Will have floated him as a 2024 Presidential candidate. Suarez is a proudly dissident Republican: he loves tech companies, welcomes migrants, and thinks his party can lead the fight against climate change. He’s no culture warrior, and, though he shares a state with Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis, he has kept both at arm’s length. So is he, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/kelefa-sanneh"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Kelefa Sanneh&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; wonders, a Republican at all? Suarez seems to be taking a long view. “Leadership,” he says, depends on whether “you have the talent to articulate a message, a vision, and a plan to get people to a place where people will follow—even if maybe they’re not so sure, maybe they’re not that comfortable with it.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd15a2da-8fb9-44c3-9b14-5f1957716eeb</guid><enclosure length="17424000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour110122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1265770"/><category>florida</category><category>francis_suarez</category><category>immigration [lc]</category><category>miami</category><category>politics</category><category>republican party (u.s. : 1854- ) [lc]</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour110122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1265770"/><media:description type="plain">Mayor Francis Suarez’s View from Miami
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/10/Francis_Suarez_AP_Wilfredo_Lee.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>18:09</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Francis Suarez, the Republican mayor of Miami, is popular in the city he governs, and increasingly prominent beyond it. Conservative voices as disparate as Kanye West and George Will have floated him as a 2024 Presidential candidate. Suarez is a proudly dissident Republican: he loves tech companies, welcomes migrants, and thinks his party can lead the fight against climate change. He’s no culture warrior, and, though he shares a state with Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis, he has kept both at arm’s length. So is he, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/kelefa-sanneh"><span>Kelefa Sanneh</span></a><span> wonders, a Republican at all? Suarez seems to be taking a long view. “Leadership,” he says, depends on whether “you have the talent to articulate a message, a vision, and a plan to get people to a place where people will follow—even if maybe they’re not so sure, maybe they’re not that comfortable with it.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Mayor Francis Suarez’s View from Miami</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Francis Suarez, the Republican mayor of Miami, is popular in the city he governs, and increasingly prominent beyond it. Conservative voices as disparate as Kanye West and George Will have floated him as a 2024 Presidential candidate. Suarez is a proudly dissident Republican: he loves tech companies, welcomes migrants, and thinks his party can lead the fight against climate change. He’s no culture warrior, and, though he shares a state with Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis, he has kept both at arm’s length. So is he, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/kelefa-sanneh"><span>Kelefa Sanneh</span></a><span> wonders, a Republican at all? Suarez seems to be taking a long view. “Leadership,” he says, depends on whether “you have the talent to articulate a message, a vision, and a plan to get people to a place where people will follow—even if maybe they’re not so sure, maybe they’re not that comfortable with it.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Francis Suarez, the Republican mayor of Miami, is popular in the city he governs, and increasingly prominent beyond it. Conservative voices as disparate as Kanye West and George Will have floated him as a 2024 Presidential candidate. Suarez is a proudly dissident Republican: he loves tech companies, welcomes migrants, and thinks his party can lead the fight against climate change. He’s no culture warrior, and, though he shares a state with Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis, he has kept both at arm’s length. So is he, Kelefa Sanneh wonders, a Republican at all? Suarez seems to be taking a long view. “Leadership,” he says, depends on whether “you have the talent to articulate a message, a vision, and a plan to get people to a place where people will follow—even if maybe they’re not so sure, maybe they’re not that comfortable with it.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>U2’s Bono Talks with David Remnick—Live
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/u2s-bono-talks-david-remnicklive-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Last month, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; published a &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/09/26/from-boy-to-bono"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Personal History&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; about growing up in Ireland during the nineteen-sixties and seventies. It covers the interfaith marriage of the author’s parents, which was unusual in Dublin; his mother’s early death; and finding his calling in music. The author was Bono, for more than forty years the lyricist and lead singer of one of the biggest rock bands on the planet. As U2 sold out arenas and stadiums, Bono held forth on a range of social causes; he became “the definitive rock star of the modern era,” as Kelefa Sanneh puts it. Bono joined David Remnick at the 2022 New Yorker Festival to talk about his new memoir, “Surrender.” “When I sang in U2, something got ahold of me,” Bono said. “And it made sense of me.” They &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;discussed how the band almost ended because of the members’ religious faith, and how they navigated the Troubles as a bunch of young men from Dublin suddenly on the world stage. Bono shared a life lesson from Paul McCartney, and he opened up about the early death of his mother. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;“This wound in me just turned into this opening where I had to fill the hole with music,” Bono said. In the loss of a loved one, “there's sometimes a gift. The opening up of music came from my mother.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f7a49929-2419-4e1d-bd6e-3594a2417dd2</guid><enclosure length="30624000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour102822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1265769"/><category>bono</category><category>ireland [lc]</category><category>memoirs [lc]</category><category>music</category><category>religion_faith</category><category>social_justice</category><category>storytelling</category><category>troubles</category><category>u2</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour102822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1265769"/><media:description type="plain">U2’s Bono Talks with David Remnick—Live
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/10/TNY_final.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>31:54</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Last month, </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> published a </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/09/26/from-boy-to-bono"><span>Personal History</span></a><span> about growing up in Ireland during the nineteen-sixties and seventies. It covers the interfaith marriage of the author’s parents, which was unusual in Dublin; his mother’s early death; and finding his calling in music. The author was Bono, for more than forty years the lyricist and lead singer of one of the biggest rock bands on the planet. As U2 sold out arenas and stadiums, Bono held forth on a range of social causes; he became “the definitive rock star of the modern era,” as Kelefa Sanneh puts it. Bono joined David Remnick at the 2022 New Yorker Festival to talk about his new memoir, “Surrender.” “When I sang in U2, something got ahold of me,” Bono said. “And it made sense of me.” They </span><span>discussed how the band almost ended because of the members’ religious faith, and how they navigated the Troubles as a bunch of young men from Dublin suddenly on the world stage. Bono shared a life lesson from Paul McCartney, and he opened up about the early death of his mother. </span><span>“This wound in me just turned into this opening where I had to fill the hole with music,” Bono said. In the loss of a loved one, “there's sometimes a gift. The opening up of music came from my mother.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>U2’s Bono Talks with David Remnick—Live</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Last month, </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> published a </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/09/26/from-boy-to-bono"><span>Personal History</span></a><span> about growing up in Ireland during the nineteen-sixties and seventies. It covers the interfaith marriage of the author’s parents, which was unusual in Dublin; his mother’s early death; and finding his calling in music. The author was Bono, for more than forty years the lyricist and lead singer of one of the biggest rock bands on the planet. As U2 sold out arenas and stadiums, Bono held forth on a range of social causes; he became “the definitive rock star of the modern era,” as Kelefa Sanneh puts it. Bono joined David Remnick at the 2022 New Yorker Festival to talk about his new memoir, “Surrender.” “When I sang in U2, something got ahold of me,” Bono said. “And it made sense of me.” They </span><span>discussed how the band almost ended because of the members’ religious faith, and how they navigated the Troubles as a bunch of young men from Dublin suddenly on the world stage. Bono shared a life lesson from Paul McCartney, and he opened up about the early death of his mother. </span><span>“This wound in me just turned into this opening where I had to fill the hole with music,” Bono said. In the loss of a loved one, “there's sometimes a gift. The opening up of music came from my mother.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Last month, The New Yorker published a Personal History about growing up in Ireland during the nineteen-sixties and seventies. It covers the interfaith marriage of the author’s parents, which was unusual in Dublin; his mother’s early death; and finding his calling in music. The author was Bono, for more than forty years the lyricist and lead singer of one of the biggest rock bands on the planet. As U2 sold out arenas and stadiums, Bono held forth on a range of social causes; he became “the definitive rock star of the modern era,” as Kelefa Sanneh puts it. Bono joined David Remnick at the 2022 New Yorker Festival to talk about his new memoir, “Surrender.” “When I sang in U2, something got ahold of me,” Bono said. “And it made sense of me.” They discussed how the band almost ended because of the members’ religious faith, and how they navigated the Troubles as a bunch of young men from Dublin suddenly on the world stage. Bono shared a life lesson from Paul McCartney, and he opened up about the early death of his mother. “This wound in me just turned into this opening where I had to fill the hole with music,” Bono said. In the loss of a loved one, “there's sometimes a gift. The opening up of music came from my mother.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Playwrights Suzan-Lori Parks and Martin McDonagh, Live at The New Yorker Festival
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/playwrights-suzan-lori-parks-and-martin-mcdonagh-live-new-yorker-festival/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;This year’s New Yorker Festival featured two conversations with renowned playwrights: Suzan-Lori Parks and Martin McDonagh. Parks, the first African American woman to receive the Pulitzer Prize for drama, sat down with the staff writer Vinson Cunningham. “The marketplace is telling us that Black joy is what sells,” she said. “I’m very suspicious about what the marketplace wants me to create because I know in my experience where real Black joy resides—and sometimes that’s in the place where there might be some traumatic thing that also happened.” A revival of Parks’s groundbreaking play, “Topdog/Underdog,” just opened on Broadway. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;And McDonagh, who is out with a new film, “The Banshees of Inisherin,” spoke with Patrick Radden Keefe. “The Banshees of Inisherin” traces the story of a friendship breaking apart in the beautiful, remote hills of western Ireland. “I just wanted this [movie] to be sort of plotless in a way,” McDonagh said. “Just to have the unravelling of this breakup be what the whole story was about.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c1a7a1f8-107f-40d2-b5d7-446955f17404</guid><enclosure length="31632000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour102522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1263885"/><category>arts</category><category>broadway</category><category>cinema</category><category>film</category><category>ireland</category><category>playwright</category><category>pulitzer_prize_for_drama</category><category>theater</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour102522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1263885"/><media:description type="plain">The Playwrights Suzan-Lori Parks and Martin McDonagh, Live at The New Yorker Festival
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/10/NYRH_Playwright.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>32:57</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>This year’s New Yorker Festival featured two conversations with renowned playwrights: Suzan-Lori Parks and Martin McDonagh. Parks, the first African American woman to receive the Pulitzer Prize for drama, sat down with the staff writer Vinson Cunningham. “The marketplace is telling us that Black joy is what sells,” she said. “I’m very suspicious about what the marketplace wants me to create because I know in my experience where real Black joy resides—and sometimes that’s in the place where there might be some traumatic thing that also happened.” A revival of Parks’s groundbreaking play, “Topdog/Underdog,” just opened on Broadway. </span></p>
<p><span>And McDonagh, who is out with a new film, “The Banshees of Inisherin,” spoke with Patrick Radden Keefe. “The Banshees of Inisherin” traces the story of a friendship breaking apart in the beautiful, remote hills of western Ireland. “I just wanted this [movie] to be sort of plotless in a way,” McDonagh said. “Just to have the unravelling of this breakup be what the whole story was about.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Playwrights Suzan-Lori Parks and Martin McDonagh, Live at The New Yorker Festival</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>This year’s New Yorker Festival featured two conversations with renowned playwrights: Suzan-Lori Parks and Martin McDonagh. Parks, the first African American woman to receive the Pulitzer Prize for drama, sat down with the staff writer Vinson Cunningham. “The marketplace is telling us that Black joy is what sells,” she said. “I’m very suspicious about what the marketplace wants me to create because I know in my experience where real Black joy resides—and sometimes that’s in the place where there might be some traumatic thing that also happened.” A revival of Parks’s groundbreaking play, “Topdog/Underdog,” just opened on Broadway. </span></p>
<p><span>And McDonagh, who is out with a new film, “The Banshees of Inisherin,” spoke with Patrick Radden Keefe. “The Banshees of Inisherin” traces the story of a friendship breaking apart in the beautiful, remote hills of western Ireland. “I just wanted this [movie] to be sort of plotless in a way,” McDonagh said. “Just to have the unravelling of this breakup be what the whole story was about.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>This year’s New Yorker Festival featured two conversations with renowned playwrights: Suzan-Lori Parks and Martin McDonagh. Parks, the first African American woman to receive the Pulitzer Prize for drama, sat down with the staff writer Vinson Cunningham. “The marketplace is telling us that Black joy is what sells,” she said. “I’m very suspicious about what the marketplace wants me to create because I know in my experience where real Black joy resides—and sometimes that’s in the place where there might be some traumatic thing that also happened.” A revival of Parks’s groundbreaking play, “Topdog/Underdog,” just opened on Broadway.  And McDonagh, who is out with a new film, “The Banshees of Inisherin,” spoke with Patrick Radden Keefe. “The Banshees of Inisherin” traces the story of a friendship breaking apart in the beautiful, remote hills of western Ireland. “I just wanted this [movie] to be sort of plotless in a way,” McDonagh said. “Just to have the unravelling of this breakup be what the whole story was about.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Vulnerabilities of our Voting Machines, and How to Secure Them
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/vulnerabilities-our-voting-machines-and-how-secure-them-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The security of voting has become a huge topic of concern. That’s especially true after 2020, when it became an article of faith for Trump supporters that the election was somehow stolen by President Joe Biden. Alex Halderman, a professor of computer science and engineering at University of Michigan, has been studying voting machines and software for more than a decade. “We made a number of discoveries, including that [voting machines] had vulnerabilities that basically anyone could exploit to inject malicious software and change votes,” he tells the staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/sue-halpern"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Sue Halpern&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. Conspiracy theories aside, he says, we must address those vulnerabilities in computerized voting. But hand counting of ballots, advocated by some election skeptics, is not a plausible solution. “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Perhaps as time goes on we’ll get Republicans and Democrats to agree that there are some real problems in election security that we would all benefit from addressing. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d0f9ba29-1204-4178-b9ca-e2d179d3d367</guid><enclosure length="16608000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour102122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1263884"/><category>computer_science</category><category>cyber_security</category><category>election</category><category>politics</category><category>security</category><category>technology</category><category>voting</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour102122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1263884"/><media:description type="plain">The Vulnerabilities of our Voting Machines, and How to Secure Them
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/10/J_Alex_Halderman_AP_photographer_Carlos_Osorio.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>17:18</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The security of voting has become a huge topic of concern. That’s especially true after 2020, when it became an article of faith for Trump supporters that the election was somehow stolen by President Joe Biden. Alex Halderman, a professor of computer science and engineering at University of Michigan, has been studying voting machines and software for more than a decade. “We made a number of discoveries, including that [voting machines] had vulnerabilities that basically anyone could exploit to inject malicious software and change votes,” he tells the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/sue-halpern"><span>Sue Halpern</span></a><span>. Conspiracy theories aside, he says, we must address those vulnerabilities in computerized voting. But hand counting of ballots, advocated by some election skeptics, is not a plausible solution. “</span><span>Perhaps as time goes on we’ll get Republicans and Democrats to agree that there are some real problems in election security that we would all benefit from addressing. </span><span>”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Vulnerabilities of our Voting Machines, and How to Secure Them</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The security of voting has become a huge topic of concern. That’s especially true after 2020, when it became an article of faith for Trump supporters that the election was somehow stolen by President Joe Biden. Alex Halderman, a professor of computer science and engineering at University of Michigan, has been studying voting machines and software for more than a decade. “We made a number of discoveries, including that [voting machines] had vulnerabilities that basically anyone could exploit to inject malicious software and change votes,” he tells the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/sue-halpern"><span>Sue Halpern</span></a><span>. Conspiracy theories aside, he says, we must address those vulnerabilities in computerized voting. But hand counting of ballots, advocated by some election skeptics, is not a plausible solution. “</span><span>Perhaps as time goes on we’ll get Republicans and Democrats to agree that there are some real problems in election security that we would all benefit from addressing. </span><span>”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The security of voting has become a huge topic of concern. That’s especially true after 2020, when it became an article of faith for Trump supporters that the election was somehow stolen by President Joe Biden. Alex Halderman, a professor of computer science and engineering at University of Michigan, has been studying voting machines and software for more than a decade. “We made a number of discoveries, including that [voting machines] had vulnerabilities that basically anyone could exploit to inject malicious software and change votes,” he tells the staff writer Sue Halpern. Conspiracy theories aside, he says, we must address those vulnerabilities in computerized voting. But hand counting of ballots, advocated by some election skeptics, is not a plausible solution. “Perhaps as time goes on we’ll get Republicans and Democrats to agree that there are some real problems in election security that we would all benefit from addressing. ”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>In Defense of the Comic Novel: Andrew Sean Greer Talks “Less is Lost”
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/defense-comic-novel-andrew-sean-greer-talks-less-lost-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Arthur Less is a novelist—a “minor American novelist,” to be precise. He’s a man whose biggest talent seems to be taking a problem and making it five times worse. And he’s the hero of Andrew Sean Greer’s novel “Less,” which won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction, an especially rare feat for a comic novel.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Andrew Sean Greer is now out with a sequel, “Less Is Lost,” which takes Arthur on a road trip across the U.S. He talks with the staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/parul-sehgal#:~:text=Parul%20Sehgal%20is%20a%20staff,Critics%20Circle%20for%20her%20criticism."&gt;&lt;span&gt;Parul Sehgal&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, for thirty years, the poet Ellen Bass has taken the same walk almost every day, on West Cliff Drive, a road along the ocean in Santa Cruz, California. Friends and family have teased her for being stuck in her ways, so she wrote the poem “Ode to Repetition,” about taking the same walk, listening to the same songs, and doing the same daily tasks, as life marches toward its end. (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment originally aired May 26, 2017.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">18d1f493-4d33-4569-b49a-527ae7c94c51</guid><enclosure length="23664000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour101422_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1260945"/><category>andrew_sean_greer</category><category>arts</category><category>author</category><category>books</category><category>california</category><category>ellen_bass</category><category>fiction</category><category>novel</category><category>poetry</category><category>pulitzer_prize</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour101422_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1260945"/><media:description type="plain">In Defense of the Comic Novel: Andrew Sean Greer Talks “Less is Lost”
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/10/Andrew_Sean_Greer.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>24:39</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Arthur Less is a novelist—a “minor American novelist,” to be precise. He’s a man whose biggest talent seems to be taking a problem and making it five times worse. And he’s the hero of Andrew Sean Greer’s novel “Less,” which won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction, an especially rare feat for a comic novel.  </span></p>
<p><span>Andrew Sean Greer is now out with a sequel, “Less Is Lost,” which takes Arthur on a road trip across the U.S. He talks with the staff writer<span> </span></span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/parul-sehgal#:~:text=Parul%20Sehgal%20is%20a%20staff,Critics%20Circle%20for%20her%20criticism."><span>Parul Sehgal</span></a><span>. </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, for thirty years, the poet Ellen Bass has taken the same walk almost every day, on West Cliff Drive, a road along the ocean in Santa Cruz, California. Friends and family have teased her for being stuck in her ways, so she wrote the poem “Ode to Repetition,” about taking the same walk, listening to the same songs, and doing the same daily tasks, as life marches toward its end. (</span><em><span>This segment originally aired May 26, 2017.</span></em><span>)</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>In Defense of the Comic Novel: Andrew Sean Greer Talks “Less is Lost”</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Arthur Less is a novelist—a “minor American novelist,” to be precise. He’s a man whose biggest talent seems to be taking a problem and making it five times worse. And he’s the hero of Andrew Sean Greer’s novel “Less,” which won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction, an especially rare feat for a comic novel.  </span></p>
<p><span>Andrew Sean Greer is now out with a sequel, “Less Is Lost,” which takes Arthur on a road trip across the U.S. He talks with the staff writer<span> </span></span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/parul-sehgal#:~:text=Parul%20Sehgal%20is%20a%20staff,Critics%20Circle%20for%20her%20criticism."><span>Parul Sehgal</span></a><span>. </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, for thirty years, the poet Ellen Bass has taken the same walk almost every day, on West Cliff Drive, a road along the ocean in Santa Cruz, California. Friends and family have teased her for being stuck in her ways, so she wrote the poem “Ode to Repetition,” about taking the same walk, listening to the same songs, and doing the same daily tasks, as life marches toward its end. (</span><em><span>This segment originally aired May 26, 2017.</span></em><span>)</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Arthur Less is a novelist—a “minor American novelist,” to be precise. He’s a man whose biggest talent seems to be taking a problem and making it five times worse. And he’s the hero of Andrew Sean Greer’s novel “Less,” which won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction, an especially rare feat for a comic novel.   Andrew Sean Greer is now out with a sequel, “Less Is Lost,” which takes Arthur on a road trip across the U.S. He talks with the staff writer Parul Sehgal.  Plus, for thirty years, the poet Ellen Bass has taken the same walk almost every day, on West Cliff Drive, a road along the ocean in Santa Cruz, California. Friends and family have teased her for being stuck in her ways, so she wrote the poem “Ode to Repetition,” about taking the same walk, listening to the same songs, and doing the same daily tasks, as life marches toward its end. (This segment originally aired May 26, 2017.)</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Tom Stoppard on “Leopoldstadt,” and Geena Davis talks with Michael Schulman
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/tom-stoppard-leopoldstadt-and-geena-davis-talks-michael-schulman-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Tom Stoppard has been a fixture on Broadway since his famous early play,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt; “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead,” travelled there in 1967. Stoppard is eighty-five years old, and has largely resisted the autobiographical element in his work. But now, in “Leopoldstadt,” a play that has just opened on Broadway, he draws on his family’s tragic losses in the Second World War. Stoppard talks with&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;the contributor &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/andrew-dickson"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Andrew Dickson&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; about his latest work. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;And the Oscar- and Emmy Award-winning actor Geena Davis, best known for her role in “Thelma and Louise,” talks with the staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Michael Schulman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; about her life and career. Davis ascribes much of her early experience on- and offscreen to a certain level of politeness, a character trait ingrained in her from childhood. “I learned politeness from minute one, I’m sure,” she tells Schulman. “That was my family: very old-fashioned New Englanders.” She reflects on her childhood, her iconic roles in the eighties and nineties, and her “journey to badassery” in her new memoir, “Dying of Politeness,” out this month. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2fe98c74-7284-40e9-90de-cb47eeb0739c</guid><enclosure length="29744000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour101122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1258798"/><category>arts</category><category>books</category><category>broadway</category><category>geena_davis</category><category>history</category><category>holocaust</category><category>memoir</category><category>play</category><category>playwright</category><category>theater</category><category>tom_stoppard</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour101122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1258798"/><media:description type="plain">Tom Stoppard on “Leopoldstadt,” and Geena Davis talks with Michael Schulman
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/10/NYRH_Stoppard.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>30:59</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Tom Stoppard has been a fixture on Broadway since his famous early play,</span><i><span> “</span></i><span>Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead,” travelled there in 1967. Stoppard is eighty-five years old, and has largely resisted the autobiographical element in his work. But now, in “Leopoldstadt,” a play that has just opened on Broadway, he draws on his family’s tragic losses in the Second World War. Stoppard talks with</span> <span>the contributor </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/andrew-dickson"><span>Andrew Dickson</span></a><span> about his latest work. </span></p>
<p><span>And the Oscar- and Emmy Award-winning actor Geena Davis, best known for her role in “Thelma and Louise,” talks with the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"><span>Michael Schulman</span></a><span> about her life and career. Davis ascribes much of her early experience on- and offscreen to a certain level of politeness, a character trait ingrained in her from childhood. “I learned politeness from minute one, I’m sure,” she tells Schulman. “That was my family: very old-fashioned New Englanders.” She reflects on her childhood, her iconic roles in the eighties and nineties, and her “journey to badassery” in her new memoir, “Dying of Politeness,” out this month. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Tom Stoppard on “Leopoldstadt,” and Geena Davis talks with Michael Schulman</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Tom Stoppard has been a fixture on Broadway since his famous early play,</span><i><span> “</span></i><span>Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead,” travelled there in 1967. Stoppard is eighty-five years old, and has largely resisted the autobiographical element in his work. But now, in “Leopoldstadt,” a play that has just opened on Broadway, he draws on his family’s tragic losses in the Second World War. Stoppard talks with</span> <span>the contributor </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/andrew-dickson"><span>Andrew Dickson</span></a><span> about his latest work. </span></p>
<p><span>And the Oscar- and Emmy Award-winning actor Geena Davis, best known for her role in “Thelma and Louise,” talks with the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"><span>Michael Schulman</span></a><span> about her life and career. Davis ascribes much of her early experience on- and offscreen to a certain level of politeness, a character trait ingrained in her from childhood. “I learned politeness from minute one, I’m sure,” she tells Schulman. “That was my family: very old-fashioned New Englanders.” She reflects on her childhood, her iconic roles in the eighties and nineties, and her “journey to badassery” in her new memoir, “Dying of Politeness,” out this month. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Tom Stoppard has been a fixture on Broadway since his famous early play, “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead,” travelled there in 1967. Stoppard is eighty-five years old, and has largely resisted the autobiographical element in his work. But now, in “Leopoldstadt,” a play that has just opened on Broadway, he draws on his family’s tragic losses in the Second World War. Stoppard talks with the contributor Andrew Dickson about his latest work.  And the Oscar- and Emmy Award-winning actor Geena Davis, best known for her role in “Thelma and Louise,” talks with the staff writer Michael Schulman about her life and career. Davis ascribes much of her early experience on- and offscreen to a certain level of politeness, a character trait ingrained in her from childhood. “I learned politeness from minute one, I’m sure,” she tells Schulman. “That was my family: very old-fashioned New Englanders.” She reflects on her childhood, her iconic roles in the eighties and nineties, and her “journey to badassery” in her new memoir, “Dying of Politeness,” out this month.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The New Abortion Underground
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/new-abortion-underground-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Since the reversal of Roe v. Wade, the contributor Stephania Taladrid has been following a network of women who are secretly distributing abortion pills across the United States. The network has its roots in Mexico, where some medications used for at-home abortion are available at a lower cost over the counter. Volunteers—they call themselves “pill fairies”—are sourcing the pills at Mexican pharmacies and bringing them over the border. The work is increasingly perilous: in states like Texas, abetting an abortion is considered a felony, carrying long prison sentences. But, to Taladrid’s sources, it’s imperative. “I mean, there’s nothing else to do, right?” one woman in Texas, who had an abortion using the medication she received from a pill fairy, said. “You can’t just lie down and accept it. You can’t.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Note: The interview excerpts featured in this story (with the exception of Verónica Cruz) are not the actual voices of Taladrid’s subjects. To protect their anonymity, the excerpts were re-recorded by actors. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/10/17/the-post-roe-abortion-underground"&gt;Read Stephania Taladrid’s full reporting at newyorker.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">db4b9e8c-874e-430b-91e0-de3a986c6be9</guid><enclosure length="24464000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour101022remix_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1258823"/><category>abortion</category><category>health</category><category>mexico</category><category>politics</category><category>reproductive_rights</category><category>roe_v_wade</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour101022remix_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1258823"/><media:description type="plain">The New Abortion Underground
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/10/NYRH_Pills.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>25:29</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Since the reversal of Roe v. Wade, the contributor Stephania Taladrid has been following a network of women who are secretly distributing abortion pills across the United States. The network has its roots in Mexico, where some medications used for at-home abortion are  available at a lower cost over the counter. Volunteers—they call themselves “pill fairies”—are sourcing the pills at Mexican pharmacies and bringing them over the border. The work is increasingly perilous: in states like Texas, abetting an abortion is considered a felony, carrying long prison sentences. But, to Taladrid’s sources, it’s imperative. “I mean, there’s nothing else to do, right?” one woman in Texas, who had an abortion using the medication she received from a pill fairy, said. “You can’t just lie down and accept it. You can’t.” </span></p>
<p><i><span>Note: The interview excerpts featured in this story (with the exception of Verónica Cruz) are not the actual voices of Taladrid’s subjects. To protect their anonymity, the excerpts were re-recorded by actors. </span></i><span> </span></p>
<p><span>Read Stephania Taladrid’s full reporting at newyorker.com.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The New Abortion Underground</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Since the reversal of Roe v. Wade, the contributor Stephania Taladrid has been following a network of women who are secretly distributing abortion pills across the United States. The network has its roots in Mexico, where some medications used for at-home abortion are  available at a lower cost over the counter. Volunteers—they call themselves “pill fairies”—are sourcing the pills at Mexican pharmacies and bringing them over the border. The work is increasingly perilous: in states like Texas, abetting an abortion is considered a felony, carrying long prison sentences. But, to Taladrid’s sources, it’s imperative. “I mean, there’s nothing else to do, right?” one woman in Texas, who had an abortion using the medication she received from a pill fairy, said. “You can’t just lie down and accept it. You can’t.” </span></p>
<p><i><span>Note: The interview excerpts featured in this story (with the exception of Verónica Cruz) are not the actual voices of Taladrid’s subjects. To protect their anonymity, the excerpts were re-recorded by actors. </span></i><span> </span></p>
<p><span>Read Stephania Taladrid’s full reporting at newyorker.com.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Since the reversal of Roe v. Wade, the contributor Stephania Taladrid has been following a network of women who are secretly distributing abortion pills across the United States. The network has its roots in Mexico, where some medications used for at-home abortion are available at a lower cost over the counter. Volunteers—they call themselves “pill fairies”—are sourcing the pills at Mexican pharmacies and bringing them over the border. The work is increasingly perilous: in states like Texas, abetting an abortion is considered a felony, carrying long prison sentences. But, to Taladrid’s sources, it’s imperative. “I mean, there’s nothing else to do, right?” one woman in Texas, who had an abortion using the medication she received from a pill fairy, said. “You can’t just lie down and accept it. You can’t.”  Note: The interview excerpts featured in this story (with the exception of Verónica Cruz) are not the actual voices of Taladrid’s subjects. To protect their anonymity, the excerpts were re-recorded by actors.   Read Stephania Taladrid’s full reporting at newyorker.com.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Major Decisions Ahead for the Supreme Court
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/major-decisions-ahead-supreme-court-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In its last term, the Supreme Court dropped bombshell after bombshell—marking major conservative advances on gun rights, separation of church and state, environmental protection, and reproductive rights. “The Court is not behaving as an institution invested in social stability,” the contributor &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jeannie-suk"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jeannie Suk Gersen&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/07/11/the-supreme-courts-conservatives-have-asserted-their-power"&gt;&lt;span&gt;wrote in July&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. She joins David Remnick to preview the Court’s fall term.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, after covering the landslide victory for pro-choice forces in Kansas this summer, the contributor Peter Slevin has been following midterm races in Michigan, where voters this fall will decide not only on state and congressional races but also on a constitutional amendment that would guarantee the right to an abortion in the state.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e3459335-dcc5-4823-a02b-c0b9cd1fb854</guid><enclosure length="18384000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour100722_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1258795"/><category>abortion</category><category>midterm_elections</category><category>politics</category><category>reproductive_rights</category><category>supreme_court</category><category>voters</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour100722_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1258795"/><media:description type="plain">Major Decisions Ahead for the Supreme Court
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/10/SupremeCourt.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>19:09</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>In its last term, the Supreme Court dropped bombshell after bombshell—marking major conservative advances on gun rights, separation of church and state, environmental protection, and reproductive rights. “The Court is not behaving as an institution invested in social stability,” the contributor </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jeannie-suk"><span>Jeannie Suk Gersen</span></a> <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/07/11/the-supreme-courts-conservatives-have-asserted-their-power"><span>wrote in July</span></a><span>. She joins David Remnick to preview the Court’s fall term.</span></p>
<p><span>Plus, after covering the landslide victory for pro-choice forces in Kansas this summer, the contributor Peter Slevin has been following midterm races in Michigan, where voters this fall will decide not only on state and congressional races but also on a constitutional amendment that would guarantee the right to an abortion in the state.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Major Decisions Ahead for the Supreme Court</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>In its last term, the Supreme Court dropped bombshell after bombshell—marking major conservative advances on gun rights, separation of church and state, environmental protection, and reproductive rights. “The Court is not behaving as an institution invested in social stability,” the contributor </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jeannie-suk"><span>Jeannie Suk Gersen</span></a> <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/07/11/the-supreme-courts-conservatives-have-asserted-their-power"><span>wrote in July</span></a><span>. She joins David Remnick to preview the Court’s fall term.</span></p>
<p><span>Plus, after covering the landslide victory for pro-choice forces in Kansas this summer, the contributor Peter Slevin has been following midterm races in Michigan, where voters this fall will decide not only on state and congressional races but also on a constitutional amendment that would guarantee the right to an abortion in the state.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>In its last term, the Supreme Court dropped bombshell after bombshell—marking major conservative advances on gun rights, separation of church and state, environmental protection, and reproductive rights. “The Court is not behaving as an institution invested in social stability,” the contributor Jeannie Suk Gersen wrote in July. She joins David Remnick to preview the Court’s fall term. Plus, after covering the landslide victory for pro-choice forces in Kansas this summer, the contributor Peter Slevin has been following midterm races in Michigan, where voters this fall will decide not only on state and congressional races but also on a constitutional amendment that would guarantee the right to an abortion in the state.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Joshua Yaffa on What’s Next for Ukraine
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/joshua-yaffa-whats-next-ukraine-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The contributor Joshua Yaffa, who was based in Moscow for years and has been reporting from Ukraine since the start of the war, speaks to David Remnick from Kyiv. There, Yaffa says, the latest news from Russia—including threats of nuclear attack and reports of political upheaval—has been treated with near-indifference. “Ukraine has been in the fight for its survival since the end of February, fully aware that Russia is ready to throw any and all resources at the attempted subjugation of the Ukrainian state,” he says. “And after things like the massacre in Bucha and other areas outside of Kyiv, earlier this spring, there’s not much that can surprise or shock or scare the Ukrainian public about what Russia is ready to do.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">84e5f0d3-d4f6-4801-b195-ce1487d8a177</guid><enclosure length="13712000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour100422_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1256854"/><category>kyiv</category><category>politics</category><category>putin</category><category>russia</category><category>ukraine</category><category>war</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour100422_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1256854"/><media:description type="plain">Joshua Yaffa on What’s Next for Ukraine
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/09/Yaffa.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>14:17</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The contributor Joshua Yaffa, who was based in Moscow for years and has been reporting from Ukraine since the start of the war, speaks to David Remnick from Kyiv. There, Yaffa says, the latest news from Russia—including threats of nuclear attack and reports of political upheaval—has been treated with near-indifference. “Ukraine has been in the fight for its survival since the end of February, fully aware that Russia is ready to throw any and all resources at the attempted subjugation of the Ukrainian state,” he says. “And after things like the massacre in Bucha and other areas outside of Kyiv, earlier this spring, there’s not much that can surprise or shock or scare the Ukrainian public about what Russia is ready to do.” </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Joshua Yaffa on What’s Next for Ukraine</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The contributor Joshua Yaffa, who was based in Moscow for years and has been reporting from Ukraine since the start of the war, speaks to David Remnick from Kyiv. There, Yaffa says, the latest news from Russia—including threats of nuclear attack and reports of political upheaval—has been treated with near-indifference. “Ukraine has been in the fight for its survival since the end of February, fully aware that Russia is ready to throw any and all resources at the attempted subjugation of the Ukrainian state,” he says. “And after things like the massacre in Bucha and other areas outside of Kyiv, earlier this spring, there’s not much that can surprise or shock or scare the Ukrainian public about what Russia is ready to do.” </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The contributor Joshua Yaffa, who was based in Moscow for years and has been reporting from Ukraine since the start of the war, speaks to David Remnick from Kyiv. There, Yaffa says, the latest news from Russia—including threats of nuclear attack and reports of political upheaval—has been treated with near-indifference. “Ukraine has been in the fight for its survival since the end of February, fully aware that Russia is ready to throw any and all resources at the attempted subjugation of the Ukrainian state,” he says. “And after things like the massacre in Bucha and other areas outside of Kyiv, earlier this spring, there’s not much that can surprise or shock or scare the Ukrainian public about what Russia is ready to do.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Billy Eichner on “Bros” and Joyce Carol Oates on “Blonde”
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/billy-eichner-bros-and-joyce-carol-oates-blonde-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;One of the first queer rom-coms released in cinemas by a major studio, “Bros” is making movie history. But the film’s co-writer and star, the comedian Billy Eichner, tells David Remnick that the milestone has taken too long to achieve. “Culture and society at large, for the vast majority of human existence, [did] not want to talk about the private lives of gay people and L.G.B.T.Q. people,” he says.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;staff writer Katy Waldman talks with the prolific novelist Joyce Carol Oates about the new film adaptation of her novel “Blonde,” which premières on Netflix this week. Directed by Andrew Dominick, it’s a fictionalized account of the life of Marilyn Monroe. Oates tells Waldman that she enjoyed the production but found it “extremely emotionally exhausting” and “not for the faint of heart.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">48bca776-9a2b-41f6-aa1d-414098638dc6</guid><enclosure length="29632000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour093022_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1256847"/><category>arts</category><category>billy_eichner</category><category>books</category><category>cinema</category><category>comedy</category><category>film</category><category>hollywood</category><category>joyce_carol_oates</category><category>lgbtq</category><category>marilyn_monroe</category><category>queer</category><category>rom_com</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour093022_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1256847"/><media:description type="plain">Billy Eichner on “Bros” and Joyce Carol Oates on “Blonde”
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/09/NYRH_Eichner.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>30:52</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>One of the first queer rom-coms released in cinemas by a major studio, “Bros” is making movie history. But the film’s co-writer and star, the comedian Billy Eichner, tells David Remnick that the milestone has taken too long to achieve. “Culture and society at large, for the vast majority of human existence, [did] not want to talk about the private lives of gay people and L.G.B.T.Q. people,” he says.</span></p>
<p><span>Plus, the<span> </span></span><span>staff writer Katy Waldman talks with the prolific novelist Joyce Carol Oates about the new film adaptation of her novel “Blonde,” which premières on Netflix this week. Directed by Andrew Dominick, it’s a fictionalized account of the life of Marilyn Monroe. Oates tells Waldman that she enjoyed the production but found it “extremely emotionally exhausting” and “not for the faint of heart.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Billy Eichner on “Bros” and Joyce Carol Oates on “Blonde”</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>One of the first queer rom-coms released in cinemas by a major studio, “Bros” is making movie history. But the film’s co-writer and star, the comedian Billy Eichner, tells David Remnick that the milestone has taken too long to achieve. “Culture and society at large, for the vast majority of human existence, [did] not want to talk about the private lives of gay people and L.G.B.T.Q. people,” he says.</span></p>
<p><span>Plus, the<span> </span></span><span>staff writer Katy Waldman talks with the prolific novelist Joyce Carol Oates about the new film adaptation of her novel “Blonde,” which premières on Netflix this week. Directed by Andrew Dominick, it’s a fictionalized account of the life of Marilyn Monroe. Oates tells Waldman that she enjoyed the production but found it “extremely emotionally exhausting” and “not for the faint of heart.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>One of the first queer rom-coms released in cinemas by a major studio, “Bros” is making movie history. But the film’s co-writer and star, the comedian Billy Eichner, tells David Remnick that the milestone has taken too long to achieve. “Culture and society at large, for the vast majority of human existence, [did] not want to talk about the private lives of gay people and L.G.B.T.Q. people,” he says. Plus, the staff writer Katy Waldman talks with the prolific novelist Joyce Carol Oates about the new film adaptation of her novel “Blonde,” which premières on Netflix this week. Directed by Andrew Dominick, it’s a fictionalized account of the life of Marilyn Monroe. Oates tells Waldman that she enjoyed the production but found it “extremely emotionally exhausting” and “not for the faint of heart.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Why Play Music: A Conversation with Questlove and Maggie Rogers
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/why-play-music-conversation-questlove-and-maggie-rogers-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Earlier this month, two acclaimed musicians—Questlove and Maggie Rogers—joined &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; Kelefa Sanneh live onstage for a conversation that probed at an essential question for musicians and music lovers alike: How can music provide a spiritual experience, and how do we sustain that feeling in our lives? Questlove—the co-founder of the Roots and the musical director of the “Tonight Show”—was one of Rogers’s professors while she was an undergraduate at New York University, and the two have stayed in touch. Rogers received a 2019 Grammy nomination for Best New Artist, after the release of her début album, “Heard It in a Past Life.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Onstage, both musicians reflected on the space that the pandemic has given them to turn inward, finding a more sustainable path in their careers. “Music is not a job, it’s a way of being,” Rogers said, to which Questlove laughed. “I’m glad you know that at twenty, because I had to learn that at fifty,” he said.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Rogers also performed songs off her new album, “Surrender.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">632258ef-3884-4ee2-8fee-5ab50bb792a3</guid><enclosure length="38240000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour092722_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1254111"/><category>arts</category><category>conversation</category><category>maggie_rogers</category><category>music</category><category>performance</category><category>questlove</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour092722_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1254111"/><media:description type="plain">Why Play Music: A Conversation with Questlove and Maggie Rogers
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/09/NYRH_Rogers_Questlove.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>39:50</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Earlier this month, two acclaimed musicians—Questlove and Maggie Rogers—joined </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> Kelefa Sanneh live onstage for a conversation that probed at an essential question for musicians and music lovers alike: How can music provide a spiritual experience, and how do we sustain that feeling in our lives? Questlove—the co-founder of the Roots and the musical director of the “Tonight Show”—was one of Rogers’s professors while she was an undergraduate at New York University, and the two have stayed in touch. Rogers received a 2019 Grammy nomination for Best New Artist, after the release of her début album, “Heard It in a Past Life.”</span></p>
<p><span>Onstage, both musicians reflected on the space that the pandemic has given them to turn inward, finding a more sustainable path in their careers. “Music is not a job, it’s a way of being,” Rogers said, to which Questlove laughed. “I’m glad you know that at twenty, because I had to learn that at fifty,” he said.</span></p>
<p><span>Rogers also performed songs off her new album, “Surrender.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Why Play Music: A Conversation with Questlove and Maggie Rogers</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Earlier this month, two acclaimed musicians—Questlove and Maggie Rogers—joined </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> Kelefa Sanneh live onstage for a conversation that probed at an essential question for musicians and music lovers alike: How can music provide a spiritual experience, and how do we sustain that feeling in our lives? Questlove—the co-founder of the Roots and the musical director of the “Tonight Show”—was one of Rogers’s professors while she was an undergraduate at New York University, and the two have stayed in touch. Rogers received a 2019 Grammy nomination for Best New Artist, after the release of her début album, “Heard It in a Past Life.”</span></p>
<p><span>Onstage, both musicians reflected on the space that the pandemic has given them to turn inward, finding a more sustainable path in their careers. “Music is not a job, it’s a way of being,” Rogers said, to which Questlove laughed. “I’m glad you know that at twenty, because I had to learn that at fifty,” he said.</span></p>
<p><span>Rogers also performed songs off her new album, “Surrender.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Earlier this month, two acclaimed musicians—Questlove and Maggie Rogers—joined The New Yorker’s Kelefa Sanneh live onstage for a conversation that probed at an essential question for musicians and music lovers alike: How can music provide a spiritual experience, and how do we sustain that feeling in our lives? Questlove—the co-founder of the Roots and the musical director of the “Tonight Show”—was one of Rogers’s professors while she was an undergraduate at New York University, and the two have stayed in touch. Rogers received a 2019 Grammy nomination for Best New Artist, after the release of her début album, “Heard It in a Past Life.” Onstage, both musicians reflected on the space that the pandemic has given them to turn inward, finding a more sustainable path in their careers. “Music is not a job, it’s a way of being,” Rogers said, to which Questlove laughed. “I’m glad you know that at twenty, because I had to learn that at fifty,” he said. Rogers also performed songs off her new album, “Surrender.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Roger Federer on Retirement and His Evolution in Tennis
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/roger-federer-retirement-and-his-evolution-tennis/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Roger Federer is playing the last professional tennis match of his career this week. It’s the end of an incredible run. Over two decades, he has demonstrated an unmatchable court intelligence and temperament, winning twenty Grand Slam titles and spending three hundred and ten weeks as the top-ranked men’s player.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In 2019, on the eve of playing in his nineteenth U.S. Open, Federer spoke with David Remnick about how he got over an early hot temper and predilection for throwing racquets on the court. At the advanced age of thirty-eight—and as a father of young children—Federer explained what he had to give up in order to keep playing professionally. “I think it’s nice to keep on playing, and really squeeze the last drop of lemon out of it,” he told Remnick, “and not leave the game of tennis thinking, Oh, I should have stayed longer.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment originally aired on August 23, 2019.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f2882ba2-7f86-4d01-ade2-3eed8eaa9523</guid><enclosure length="9696000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour092322_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1254107"/><category>retirement</category><category>roger_federer</category><category>sports</category><category>tennis</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour092322_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1254107"/><media:description type="plain">Roger Federer on Retirement and His Evolution in Tennis
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2019/08/RadioHour-Federer-4x3.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>10:06</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Roger Federer is playing the last professional tennis match of his career this week. It’s the end of an incredible run. Over two decades, he has demonstrated an unmatchable court intelligence and temperament, winning twenty Grand Slam titles and spending three hundred and ten weeks as the top-ranked men’s player.</span></p>
<p><span>In 2019, on the eve of playing in his nineteenth U.S. Open, Federer spoke with David Remnick about how he got over an early hot temper and predilection for throwing racquets on the court. At the advanced age of thirty-eight—and as a father of young children—Federer explained what he had to give up in order to keep playing professionally. “I think it’s nice to keep on playing, and really squeeze the last drop of lemon out of it,” he told Remnick, “and not leave the game of tennis thinking, Oh, I should have stayed longer.”</span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired on August 23, 2019.</span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Roger Federer on Retirement and His Evolution in Tennis</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Roger Federer is playing the last professional tennis match of his career this week. It’s the end of an incredible run. Over two decades, he has demonstrated an unmatchable court intelligence and temperament, winning twenty Grand Slam titles and spending three hundred and ten weeks as the top-ranked men’s player.</span></p>
<p><span>In 2019, on the eve of playing in his nineteenth U.S. Open, Federer spoke with David Remnick about how he got over an early hot temper and predilection for throwing racquets on the court. At the advanced age of thirty-eight—and as a father of young children—Federer explained what he had to give up in order to keep playing professionally. “I think it’s nice to keep on playing, and really squeeze the last drop of lemon out of it,” he told Remnick, “and not leave the game of tennis thinking, Oh, I should have stayed longer.”</span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired on August 23, 2019.</span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Roger Federer is playing the last professional tennis match of his career this week. It’s the end of an incredible run. Over two decades, he has demonstrated an unmatchable court intelligence and temperament, winning twenty Grand Slam titles and spending three hundred and ten weeks as the top-ranked men’s player. In 2019, on the eve of playing in his nineteenth U.S. Open, Federer spoke with David Remnick about how he got over an early hot temper and predilection for throwing racquets on the court. At the advanced age of thirty-eight—and as a father of young children—Federer explained what he had to give up in order to keep playing professionally. “I think it’s nice to keep on playing, and really squeeze the last drop of lemon out of it,” he told Remnick, “and not leave the game of tennis thinking, Oh, I should have stayed longer.” This segment originally aired on August 23, 2019.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Will Voter Suppression Become the Law?
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/will-voter-suppression-become-law/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Now seven weeks away, the midterms are often cast as a referendum on the President and his party. But, this year, some see democracy itself on the ballot. One of those people is the attorney Mark Elias, who has made the fight for voting rights his mission. The Supreme Court will hear two of his cases in its upcoming term, which starts next month. Earlier this year, the staff writer Sue Halpern &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/persons-of-interest/the-first-defense-against-trumps-assault-on-democracy"&gt;&lt;span&gt;profiled&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; Elias for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;, and she spoke with him again recently about the legal fight ahead. “I really believe that when the history books are written,” says Elias, “what they write about our generation will be whether or not we were able to preserve democracy.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">38052f8e-b903-42c2-9ca9-e688d0bf1b4b</guid><enclosure length="19840000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour092022_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1251523"/><category>democracy</category><category>politics</category><category>sue_halpern</category><category>supreme_court</category><category>voter_suppression</category><category>voting_rights</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour092022_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1251523"/><media:description type="plain">Will Voter Suppression Become the Law?
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2022/09/Marc_Elias_AP_Pool.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>20:40</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Now seven weeks away, the midterms are often cast as a referendum on the President and his party. But, this year, some see democracy itself on the ballot. One of those people is the attorney Mark Elias, who has made the fight for voting rights his mission. The Supreme Court will hear two of his cases in its upcoming term, which starts next month. Earlier this year, the staff writer Sue Halpern </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/persons-of-interest/the-first-defense-against-trumps-assault-on-democracy"><span>profiled</span></a><span> Elias for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span>, and she spoke with him again recently about the legal fight ahead. “I really believe that when the history books are written,” says Elias, “what they write about our generation will be whether or not we were able to preserve democracy.” </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Will Voter Suppression Become the Law?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Now seven weeks away, the midterms are often cast as a referendum on the President and his party. But, this year, some see democracy itself on the ballot. One of those people is the attorney Mark Elias, who has made the fight for voting rights his mission. The Supreme Court will hear two of his cases in its upcoming term, which starts next month. Earlier this year, the staff writer Sue Halpern </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/persons-of-interest/the-first-defense-against-trumps-assault-on-democracy"><span>profiled</span></a><span> Elias for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span>, and she spoke with him again recently about the legal fight ahead. “I really believe that when the history books are written,” says Elias, “what they write about our generation will be whether or not we were able to preserve democracy.” </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Now seven weeks away, the midterms are often cast as a referendum on the President and his party. But, this year, some see democracy itself on the ballot. One of those people is the attorney Mark Elias, who has made the fight for voting rights his mission. The Supreme Court will hear two of his cases in its upcoming term, which starts next month. Earlier this year, the staff writer Sue Halpern profiled Elias for The New Yorker, and she spoke with him again recently about the legal fight ahead. “I really believe that when the history books are written,” says Elias, “what they write about our generation will be whether or not we were able to preserve democracy.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Andy Borowitz, and the Hunt for Invasive Lionfish
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/andy-borowitz-and-hunt-invasive-lionfish/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Not only are we living in a time where people are proud of their ignorance, argues the writer and comedian Andy Borowitz, but some of our most educated politicians are now playing down their intelligence as a strategy to get elected. Borowitz, the author of the long-running satirical column The Borowitz Report, examines this phenomenon in his new book, “Profiles of Ignorance: How America’s Politicians Got Dumb and Dumber.” “When Trump was elected, a lot of us supposedly knowledgeable people were taken by surprise,” he tells David Remnick. “But the more I researched the past fifty years, the more likely and plausible—and maybe even inevitable—his election was, because he actually had a great deal in common with his forebears." &lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, native to the waters of the Indo-Pacific, lionfish have proven themselves incredibly well adapted to the Atlantic coast. In their original habitat, the fish are kept under control by natural predators: groupers, eels, and sharks. But, elsewhere, predators can’t compete, and lionfish—with their voracious appetite and high fecundity—are upending the equilibrium of reef life. The staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/d-t-max"&gt;&lt;span&gt;D. T. Max&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; takes a stab at lionfish spearing off the coast of Florida and talks with one of the most passionate lionfish hunters diving today, Rachel Bowman. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e4cb026c-c9c9-430a-a5c6-2ee53cfad5e9</guid><enclosure length="28256000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour091622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1251525"/><category>andy_borowitz</category><category>comedy</category><category>divers</category><category>dt_max</category><category>environment</category><category>fish</category><category>hunting</category><category>invasive_species</category><category>lionfish</category><category>politicians</category><category>politics</category><category>science</category><category>wildlife</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour091622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1251525"/><media:description type="plain">Andy Borowitz, and the Hunt for Invasive Lionfish
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/09/NYRH_Lionfish.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>29:26</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Not only are we living in a time where people are proud of their ignorance, argues the writer and comedian Andy Borowitz, but some of our most educated politicians are now playing down their intelligence as a strategy to get elected. Borowitz, the author of the long-running satirical column The Borowitz Report, examines this phenomenon in his new book, “Profiles of Ignorance: How America’s Politicians Got Dumb and Dumber.” “When Trump was elected, a lot of us supposedly knowledgeable people were taken by surprise,” he tells David Remnick. “But the more I researched the past fifty years, the more likely and plausible—and maybe even inevitable—his election was, because he actually had a great deal in common with his forebears." </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, native to the waters of the Indo-Pacific, lionfish have proven themselves incredibly well adapted to the Atlantic coast. In their original habitat, the fish are kept under control by natural predators: groupers, eels, and sharks. But, elsewhere, predators can’t compete, and lionfish—with their voracious appetite and high fecundity—are upending the equilibrium of reef life. The staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/d-t-max"><span>D. T. Max</span></a><span> takes a stab at lionfish spearing off the coast of Florida and talks with one of the most passionate lionfish hunters diving today, Rachel Bowman. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Andy Borowitz, and the Hunt for Invasive Lionfish</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Not only are we living in a time where people are proud of their ignorance, argues the writer and comedian Andy Borowitz, but some of our most educated politicians are now playing down their intelligence as a strategy to get elected. Borowitz, the author of the long-running satirical column The Borowitz Report, examines this phenomenon in his new book, “Profiles of Ignorance: How America’s Politicians Got Dumb and Dumber.” “When Trump was elected, a lot of us supposedly knowledgeable people were taken by surprise,” he tells David Remnick. “But the more I researched the past fifty years, the more likely and plausible—and maybe even inevitable—his election was, because he actually had a great deal in common with his forebears." </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, native to the waters of the Indo-Pacific, lionfish have proven themselves incredibly well adapted to the Atlantic coast. In their original habitat, the fish are kept under control by natural predators: groupers, eels, and sharks. But, elsewhere, predators can’t compete, and lionfish—with their voracious appetite and high fecundity—are upending the equilibrium of reef life. The staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/d-t-max"><span>D. T. Max</span></a><span> takes a stab at lionfish spearing off the coast of Florida and talks with one of the most passionate lionfish hunters diving today, Rachel Bowman. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Not only are we living in a time where people are proud of their ignorance, argues the writer and comedian Andy Borowitz, but some of our most educated politicians are now playing down their intelligence as a strategy to get elected. Borowitz, the author of the long-running satirical column The Borowitz Report, examines this phenomenon in his new book, “Profiles of Ignorance: How America’s Politicians Got Dumb and Dumber.” “When Trump was elected, a lot of us supposedly knowledgeable people were taken by surprise,” he tells David Remnick. “But the more I researched the past fifty years, the more likely and plausible—and maybe even inevitable—his election was, because he actually had a great deal in common with his forebears."   Plus, native to the waters of the Indo-Pacific, lionfish have proven themselves incredibly well adapted to the Atlantic coast. In their original habitat, the fish are kept under control by natural predators: groupers, eels, and sharks. But, elsewhere, predators can’t compete, and lionfish—with their voracious appetite and high fecundity—are upending the equilibrium of reef life. The staff writer D. T. Max takes a stab at lionfish spearing off the coast of Florida and talks with one of the most passionate lionfish hunters diving today, Rachel Bowman.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>How Sheryl Lee Ralph Is Reshaping Hollywood
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/how-sheryl-lee-ralph-reshaping-hollywood-pod2/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Sheryl Lee Ralph has been a staple of Black entertainment for decades. She played Deena Jones in the original Broadway production of “Dreamgirls,” and was in “Sister Act 2” alongside Lauryn Hill and Whoopi Goldberg. She’s currently starring in the new ABC sitcom “Abbott Elementary,” for which she just won her first Emmy Award. Her decades-long career gives her a unique perspective on how the industry has changed since she started—and how it hasn’t. “I think that, sometimes in order for institutions like Broadway to truly make room for others, you’ve got to break it down,” she tells The New Yorker’s Vinson Cunningham. “Because you’ve got to help people see things differently, outside of their own vision. And, even if it’s 20/20, it’s not perfect.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;em&gt;This segment was originally aired on February 25, 2022.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 17:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6d410ed8-476d-4815-859d-d73d802418be</guid><enclosure length="26240000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour091322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1250009"/><category>art</category><category>culture</category><category>emmys</category><category>hollywod</category><category>news</category><category>quinta_brunson</category><category>sitcom</category><category>storytelling</category><category>television</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour091322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1250009"/><media:description type="plain">How Sheryl Lee Ralph Is Reshaping Hollywood
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/02/abbottelementary.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>27:20</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Sheryl Lee Ralph has been a staple of Black entertainment for decades. She played Deena Jones in the original Broadway production of “Dreamgirls,” and was in “Sister Act 2” alongside Lauryn Hill and Whoopi Goldberg. She’s currently starring in the new ABC sitcom “Abbott Elementary,” for which she just won her first Emmy Award. Her decades-long career gives her a unique perspective on how the industry has changed since she started—and how it hasn’t. “I think that, sometimes in order for institutions like Broadway to truly make room for others, you’ve got to break it down,” she tells The New Yorker’s Vinson Cunningham. “Because you’ve got to help people see things differently, outside of their own vision. And, even if it’s 20/20, it’s not perfect.”</span></p>
<p><span><em>This segment was originally aired on February 25, 2022.</em> </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>How Sheryl Lee Ralph Is Reshaping Hollywood</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Sheryl Lee Ralph has been a staple of Black entertainment for decades. She played Deena Jones in the original Broadway production of “Dreamgirls,” and was in “Sister Act 2” alongside Lauryn Hill and Whoopi Goldberg. She’s currently starring in the new ABC sitcom “Abbott Elementary,” for which she just won her first Emmy Award. Her decades-long career gives her a unique perspective on how the industry has changed since she started—and how it hasn’t. “I think that, sometimes in order for institutions like Broadway to truly make room for others, you’ve got to break it down,” she tells The New Yorker’s Vinson Cunningham. “Because you’ve got to help people see things differently, outside of their own vision. And, even if it’s 20/20, it’s not perfect.”</span></p>
<p><span><em>This segment was originally aired on February 25, 2022.</em> </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Sheryl Lee Ralph has been a staple of Black entertainment for decades. She played Deena Jones in the original Broadway production of “Dreamgirls,” and was in “Sister Act 2” alongside Lauryn Hill and Whoopi Goldberg. She’s currently starring in the new ABC sitcom “Abbott Elementary,” for which she just won her first Emmy Award. Her decades-long career gives her a unique perspective on how the industry has changed since she started—and how it hasn’t. “I think that, sometimes in order for institutions like Broadway to truly make room for others, you’ve got to break it down,” she tells The New Yorker’s Vinson Cunningham. “Because you’ve got to help people see things differently, outside of their own vision. And, even if it’s 20/20, it’s not perfect.” This segment was originally aired on February 25, 2022.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Keeping Score: A Year Inside a Divided Brooklyn High School
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/keeping-score-year-inside-divided-brooklyn-high-school-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Nearly seventy years after the Brown v. Board of Education decision, our public schools effectively remain segregated. And, by some measures, New York City has the most segregated system in the country. For a group of high schools in Brooklyn, change has long seemed impossible. But now those schools are putting their hopes in an unlikely place: sports.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The John Jay Educational Campus in Park Slope, Brooklyn, houses four public high schools. Three of them have a student body with a Black-and-Latino majority; the fourth is disproportionately white and Asian. For a decade, students from all four schools shared a cafeteria and a gym but played on two separate sports teams—sometimes even competing against one other. Last year, the athletics programs merged, and the hope is that this change will break down some of the divisions between students. Angelina Sharifi, a student who plays volleyball, said that a team has to mesh in order to win. “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;And meshing is, like, the best feeling ever—having a pass, set, swing, that fits perfectly with one another,” she said. “That kind of unspoken connection that comes with volleyball is super-satisfying for me.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;This is a story of how students and adults grapple with enduring inequities, and how the merger is playing out on the girls’ varsity volleyball team. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;“I want this to work. I really do,” the student Mariah Morgan said, “because it has the potential to be incredibly anti-racist.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This reporting originally aired as part of the podcast “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/anxiety/projects/keeping-score"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Keeping Score&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;,” a co-production of WNYC Studios and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.bellvoices.org/"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Bell&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c4439593-47fa-44a3-9c16-f58961f4812c</guid><enclosure length="47376000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour090922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1248541"/><category>brooklyn</category><category>brown_v_board_of_education</category><category>education</category><category>park_slope</category><category>public_school</category><category>segregation</category><category>sports</category><category>volleyball</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour090922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1248541"/><media:description type="plain">Keeping Score: A Year Inside a Divided Brooklyn High School
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/09/NYRH_Volleyball.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>49:21</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jessica Gould</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jenny Lawton</dc:creator><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emily Botein</dc:creator><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Nearly seventy years after the Brown v. Board of Education decision, our public schools effectively remain segregated. And, by some measures, New York City has the most segregated system in the country. For a group of high schools in Brooklyn, change has long seemed impossible. But now those schools are putting their hopes in an unlikely place: sports.</span></p>
<p><span>The John Jay Educational Campus in Park Slope, Brooklyn, houses four public high schools. Three of them have a student body with a Black-and-Latino majority; the fourth is disproportionately white and Asian. For a decade, students from all four schools shared a cafeteria and a gym but played on two separate sports teams—sometimes even competing against one other. Last year, the athletics programs merged, and the hope is that this change will break down some of the divisions between students. Angelina Sharifi, a student who plays volleyball, said that a team has to mesh in order to win. “</span><span>And meshing is, like, the best feeling ever—having a pass, set, swing, that fits perfectly with one another,” she said. “That kind of unspoken connection that comes with volleyball is super-satisfying for me.</span></p>
<p><span>This is a story of how students and adults grapple with enduring inequities, and how the merger is playing out on the girls’ varsity volleyball team.<span> </span></span><span>“I want this to work. I really do,” the student Mariah Morgan said, “because it has the potential to be incredibly anti-racist.”</span></p>
<p><em><span>This reporting originally aired as part of the podcast “</span></em><a href="https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/anxiety/projects/keeping-score"><em><span>Keeping Score</span></em></a><em><span>,” a co-production of WNYC Studios and<span> </span></span></em><a href="https://www.bellvoices.org/"><em><span>The Bell</span></em></a><span>.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Keeping Score: A Year Inside a Divided Brooklyn High School</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Nearly seventy years after the Brown v. Board of Education decision, our public schools effectively remain segregated. And, by some measures, New York City has the most segregated system in the country. For a group of high schools in Brooklyn, change has long seemed impossible. But now those schools are putting their hopes in an unlikely place: sports.</span></p>
<p><span>The John Jay Educational Campus in Park Slope, Brooklyn, houses four public high schools. Three of them have a student body with a Black-and-Latino majority; the fourth is disproportionately white and Asian. For a decade, students from all four schools shared a cafeteria and a gym but played on two separate sports teams—sometimes even competing against one other. Last year, the athletics programs merged, and the hope is that this change will break down some of the divisions between students. Angelina Sharifi, a student who plays volleyball, said that a team has to mesh in order to win. “</span><span>And meshing is, like, the best feeling ever—having a pass, set, swing, that fits perfectly with one another,” she said. “That kind of unspoken connection that comes with volleyball is super-satisfying for me.</span></p>
<p><span>This is a story of how students and adults grapple with enduring inequities, and how the merger is playing out on the girls’ varsity volleyball team.<span> </span></span><span>“I want this to work. I really do,” the student Mariah Morgan said, “because it has the potential to be incredibly anti-racist.”</span></p>
<p><em><span>This reporting originally aired as part of the podcast “</span></em><a href="https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/anxiety/projects/keeping-score"><em><span>Keeping Score</span></em></a><em><span>,” a co-production of WNYC Studios and<span> </span></span></em><a href="https://www.bellvoices.org/"><em><span>The Bell</span></em></a><span>.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Nearly seventy years after the Brown v. Board of Education decision, our public schools effectively remain segregated. And, by some measures, New York City has the most segregated system in the country. For a group of high schools in Brooklyn, change has long seemed impossible. But now those schools are putting their hopes in an unlikely place: sports. The John Jay Educational Campus in Park Slope, Brooklyn, houses four public high schools. Three of them have a student body with a Black-and-Latino majority; the fourth is disproportionately white and Asian. For a decade, students from all four schools shared a cafeteria and a gym but played on two separate sports teams—sometimes even competing against one other. Last year, the athletics programs merged, and the hope is that this change will break down some of the divisions between students. Angelina Sharifi, a student who plays volleyball, said that a team has to mesh in order to win. “And meshing is, like, the best feeling ever—having a pass, set, swing, that fits perfectly with one another,” she said. “That kind of unspoken connection that comes with volleyball is super-satisfying for me. This is a story of how students and adults grapple with enduring inequities, and how the merger is playing out on the girls’ varsity volleyball team. “I want this to work. I really do,” the student Mariah Morgan said, “because it has the potential to be incredibly anti-racist.” This reporting originally aired as part of the podcast “Keeping Score,” a co-production of WNYC Studios and The Bell.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Aimee Mann Live, with Atul Gawande
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/aimee-mann-live-atul-gawande-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Aimee Mann, the celebrated Los Angeles singer and songwriter, recently released an album called “Queens of the Summer Hotel.” It was inspired in part by Susanna Kaysen’s best-selling memoir “Girl, Interrupted,” about Kaysen’s time in a psychiatric hospital. Mann sat down with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/atul-gawande?source=search_google_dsa_paid&amp;amp;gclid=CjwKCAiAv_KMBhAzEiwAs-rX1LmZwop5gjPIz1BxVXHqjse3TD3nH9KqvnzhoAUdNVuHnin_wQmzXRoCu3oQAvD_BwE"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Atul Gawande&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; at The New Yorker Festival to talk about the new album, the lessons of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/tag/coronavirus"&gt;&lt;span&gt;living through a pandemic&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, and how liberated she felt when she broke her ties with major record labels. “When you’re at a record label and you’re trying to ascertain whether something can be a hit or a single, you listen in a different way—and then everything sounds like garbage,” she said. Mann decided that she didn’t “want to keep baring my soul to people who hate everything I’m doing.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment was originally aired November 26, 2021.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f082a138-8d1d-4d74-b6e5-91526e400ea7</guid><enclosure length="22576000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour090622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1245093"/><category>aimee_mann</category><category>arts</category><category>interview</category><category>music</category><category>new_yorker_festival</category><category>performance</category><category>singer_songwriter</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour090622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1245093"/><media:description type="plain">Aimee Mann Live, with Atul Gawande
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2021/11/RadioHour_Aimee_Mann_Dave_Grohl.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>23:31</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Aimee Mann, the celebrated Los Angeles singer and songwriter, recently released an album called “Queens of the Summer Hotel.” It was inspired in part by Susanna Kaysen’s best-selling memoir “Girl, Interrupted,” about Kaysen’s time in a psychiatric hospital. Mann sat down with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/atul-gawande?source=search_google_dsa_paid&amp;gclid=CjwKCAiAv_KMBhAzEiwAs-rX1LmZwop5gjPIz1BxVXHqjse3TD3nH9KqvnzhoAUdNVuHnin_wQmzXRoCu3oQAvD_BwE"><span>Atul Gawande</span></a><span> at The New Yorker Festival to talk about the new album, the lessons of </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/tag/coronavirus"><span>living through a pandemic</span></a><span>, and how liberated she felt when she broke her ties with major record labels. “When you’re at a record label and you’re trying to ascertain whether something can be a hit or a single, you listen in a different way—and then everything sounds like garbage,” she said. Mann decided that she didn’t “want to keep baring my soul to people who hate everything I’m doing.” </span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment was originally aired November 26, 2021.</span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Aimee Mann Live, with Atul Gawande</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Aimee Mann, the celebrated Los Angeles singer and songwriter, recently released an album called “Queens of the Summer Hotel.” It was inspired in part by Susanna Kaysen’s best-selling memoir “Girl, Interrupted,” about Kaysen’s time in a psychiatric hospital. Mann sat down with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/atul-gawande?source=search_google_dsa_paid&amp;gclid=CjwKCAiAv_KMBhAzEiwAs-rX1LmZwop5gjPIz1BxVXHqjse3TD3nH9KqvnzhoAUdNVuHnin_wQmzXRoCu3oQAvD_BwE"><span>Atul Gawande</span></a><span> at The New Yorker Festival to talk about the new album, the lessons of </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/tag/coronavirus"><span>living through a pandemic</span></a><span>, and how liberated she felt when she broke her ties with major record labels. “When you’re at a record label and you’re trying to ascertain whether something can be a hit or a single, you listen in a different way—and then everything sounds like garbage,” she said. Mann decided that she didn’t “want to keep baring my soul to people who hate everything I’m doing.” </span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment was originally aired November 26, 2021.</span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Aimee Mann, the celebrated Los Angeles singer and songwriter, recently released an album called “Queens of the Summer Hotel.” It was inspired in part by Susanna Kaysen’s best-selling memoir “Girl, Interrupted,” about Kaysen’s time in a psychiatric hospital. Mann sat down with Atul Gawande at The New Yorker Festival to talk about the new album, the lessons of living through a pandemic, and how liberated she felt when she broke her ties with major record labels. “When you’re at a record label and you’re trying to ascertain whether something can be a hit or a single, you listen in a different way—and then everything sounds like garbage,” she said. Mann decided that she didn’t “want to keep baring my soul to people who hate everything I’m doing.”  This segment was originally aired November 26, 2021.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Dave Grohl’s Tales of Life and Music
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/dave-grohls-tales-life-and-music-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;At The New Yorker Festival, Dave Grohl talked with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/kelefa-sanneh"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Kelefa Sanneh&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; about Grohl’s recent book, “The Storyteller: Tales of Life and Music.” Grohl, who was the drummer for Nirvana before becoming the front man of the Foo Fighters, recalled one of his earliest experiences of taking music seriously: harmonizing with his mom to Carly Simon on the car radio. He also talked about what it was like to collaborate with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/personal-history/my-time-with-kurt-cobain"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Kurt Cobain&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, who was known for his capricious genius, and about stepping out from behind the drums to lead his own band. “After Kurt died, I was, like, I’m not playing music anymore—it’s too painful,” he remembered. “And then I eventually realized that if music saved my life, my entire life, this is what’s going to save my life again.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;em&gt;This segment was originally aired November 26, 2021.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">bf8750fe-c074-4ee4-b3d4-aa8934095bea</guid><enclosure length="25584000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour090222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1245088"/><category>arts</category><category>dave_grohl</category><category>foo_fighters</category><category>interview</category><category>music</category><category>new_yorker_festival</category><category>nirvana</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour090222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1245088"/><media:description type="plain">Dave Grohl’s Tales of Life and Music
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2021/11/RadioHour_Aimee_Mann_Dave_Grohl.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>26:39</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>At The New Yorker Festival, Dave Grohl talked with <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/kelefa-sanneh"><span>Kelefa Sanneh</span></a><span> about Grohl’s recent book, “The Storyteller: Tales of Life and Music.” Grohl, who was the drummer for Nirvana before becoming the front man of the Foo Fighters, recalled one of his earliest experiences of taking music seriously: harmonizing with his mom to Carly Simon on the car radio. He also talked about what it was like to collaborate with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/personal-history/my-time-with-kurt-cobain"><span>Kurt Cobain</span></a><span>, who was known for his capricious genius, and about stepping out from behind the drums to lead his own band. “After Kurt died, I was, like, I’m not playing music anymore—it’s too painful,” he remembered. “And then I eventually realized that if music saved my life, my entire life, this is what’s going to save my life again.”</span></span></p>
<p><span><span><i>This segment was originally aired November 26, 2021.</i></span></span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Dave Grohl’s Tales of Life and Music</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>At The New Yorker Festival, Dave Grohl talked with <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/kelefa-sanneh"><span>Kelefa Sanneh</span></a><span> about Grohl’s recent book, “The Storyteller: Tales of Life and Music.” Grohl, who was the drummer for Nirvana before becoming the front man of the Foo Fighters, recalled one of his earliest experiences of taking music seriously: harmonizing with his mom to Carly Simon on the car radio. He also talked about what it was like to collaborate with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/personal-history/my-time-with-kurt-cobain"><span>Kurt Cobain</span></a><span>, who was known for his capricious genius, and about stepping out from behind the drums to lead his own band. “After Kurt died, I was, like, I’m not playing music anymore—it’s too painful,” he remembered. “And then I eventually realized that if music saved my life, my entire life, this is what’s going to save my life again.”</span></span></p>
<p><span><span><i>This segment was originally aired November 26, 2021.</i></span></span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>At The New Yorker Festival, Dave Grohl talked with Kelefa Sanneh about Grohl’s recent book, “The Storyteller: Tales of Life and Music.” Grohl, who was the drummer for Nirvana before becoming the front man of the Foo Fighters, recalled one of his earliest experiences of taking music seriously: harmonizing with his mom to Carly Simon on the car radio. He also talked about what it was like to collaborate with Kurt Cobain, who was known for his capricious genius, and about stepping out from behind the drums to lead his own band. “After Kurt died, I was, like, I’m not playing music anymore—it’s too painful,” he remembered. “And then I eventually realized that if music saved my life, my entire life, this is what’s going to save my life again.” This segment was originally aired November 26, 2021.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>A New Civil War in America?
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/new-civil-war-america-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Since the F.B.I. raid on former President Donald Trump’s home, Mar-A-Lago, the phrases “civil war” and “lock and load” have trended on right-wing social media. The F.B.I. and the Department of Homeland Security are taking the threats seriously, and issued an internal warning that detailed specific calls for assassinating the judge and the agents involved in authorizing and carrying out the search. Where could this all be headed? David Remnick talks with Barbara F. Walter, the author of the new book “How Civil Wars Start: And How to Stop Them.” Walter is a political scientist and a professor at the University of California, San Diego, and a co-director of the online magazine Political Violence at a Glance. She has studied countries that slide into civil war for the C.I.A., and she says that the United States meets many of the criteria her group identified. In particular, anti-democratic trends such as increased voting restrictions point to a nation on the brink. “Full democracies rarely have civil wars. Full autocracies rarely have civil wars,” she says. “It’s the ones that are in between that are particularly at risk.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment was originally aired January 7, 2022.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The segment also features an excerpt from “The Muddle,” a short story by Sana Krasikov. The full story is available on newyorker.com.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">bf6bda83-3510-4614-a596-d241ccef6796</guid><enclosure length="30992000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour083022d_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1243557"/><category>autocracy</category><category>civil_war</category><category>extremism</category><category>political_violence</category><category>politics</category><category>right_wing</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour083022d_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1243557"/><media:description type="plain">A New Civil War in America?
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/01/NYRH_final-6.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>32:17</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Since the F.B.I. raid on former President Donald Trump’s home, Mar-A-Lago, the phrases “civil war” and “lock and load” have trended on right-wing social media. The F.B.I. and the Department of Homeland Security are taking the threats seriously, and issued an internal warning that detailed specific calls for assassinating the judge and the agents involved in authorizing and carrying out the search. Where could this all be headed? David Remnick talks with Barbara F. Walter, the author of the new book “How Civil Wars Start: And How to Stop Them.” Walter is a political scientist and a professor at the University of California, San Diego, and a co-director of the online magazine Political Violence at a Glance. She has studied countries that slide into civil war for the C.I.A., and she says that the United States meets many of the criteria her group identified. In particular, anti-democratic trends such as increased voting restrictions point to a nation on the brink. “Full democracies rarely have civil wars. Full autocracies rarely have civil wars,” she says. “It’s the ones that are in between that are particularly at risk.”</span></p>
<p><span>This segment was originally aired January 7, 2022.</span></p>
<p><span>The segment also features an excerpt from “The Muddle,” a short story by Sana Krasikov. The full story is available on newyorker.com.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>A New Civil War in America?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Since the F.B.I. raid on former President Donald Trump’s home, Mar-A-Lago, the phrases “civil war” and “lock and load” have trended on right-wing social media. The F.B.I. and the Department of Homeland Security are taking the threats seriously, and issued an internal warning that detailed specific calls for assassinating the judge and the agents involved in authorizing and carrying out the search. Where could this all be headed? David Remnick talks with Barbara F. Walter, the author of the new book “How Civil Wars Start: And How to Stop Them.” Walter is a political scientist and a professor at the University of California, San Diego, and a co-director of the online magazine Political Violence at a Glance. She has studied countries that slide into civil war for the C.I.A., and she says that the United States meets many of the criteria her group identified. In particular, anti-democratic trends such as increased voting restrictions point to a nation on the brink. “Full democracies rarely have civil wars. Full autocracies rarely have civil wars,” she says. “It’s the ones that are in between that are particularly at risk.”</span></p>
<p><span>This segment was originally aired January 7, 2022.</span></p>
<p><span>The segment also features an excerpt from “The Muddle,” a short story by Sana Krasikov. The full story is available on newyorker.com.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Since the F.B.I. raid on former President Donald Trump’s home, Mar-A-Lago, the phrases “civil war” and “lock and load” have trended on right-wing social media. The F.B.I. and the Department of Homeland Security are taking the threats seriously, and issued an internal warning that detailed specific calls for assassinating the judge and the agents involved in authorizing and carrying out the search. Where could this all be headed? David Remnick talks with Barbara F. Walter, the author of the new book “How Civil Wars Start: And How to Stop Them.” Walter is a political scientist and a professor at the University of California, San Diego, and a co-director of the online magazine Political Violence at a Glance. She has studied countries that slide into civil war for the C.I.A., and she says that the United States meets many of the criteria her group identified. In particular, anti-democratic trends such as increased voting restrictions point to a nation on the brink. “Full democracies rarely have civil wars. Full autocracies rarely have civil wars,” she says. “It’s the ones that are in between that are particularly at risk.” This segment was originally aired January 7, 2022. The segment also features an excerpt from “The Muddle,” a short story by Sana Krasikov. The full story is available on newyorker.com.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Actor Jenifer Lewis: Mother, Activist, Hurricane
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/actor-jenifer-lewis-mother-activist-hurricane-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jenifer Lewis is known as the “Mother of Black Hollywood” for good reason; her screen progeny have included Whitney Houston, Angela Bassett, and Tupac Shakur. In her latest turn, she’s playing the alpha boss of a home-shopping network on the Showtime series “I Love That For You.” It’s no surprise that Lewis keeps getting cast as formidable ladies—the roles come naturally to her, as you’ll hear in her conversation with the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; contributor Michael Schulman. Lewis’s new memoir is called “Walking in My Joy: In These Streets.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">68ae3636-ecf3-4f97-aafa-484df0adc74f</guid><enclosure length="16864000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour082622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1243553"/><category>arts</category><category>books</category><category>cinema</category><category>film</category><category>hollywood</category><category>jennifer_lewis</category><category>music</category><category>piano</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour082622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1243553"/><media:description type="plain">The Actor Jenifer Lewis: Mother, Activist, Hurricane
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/08/NYRH_JenniferLewis.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>17:34</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Jenifer Lewis is known as the “Mother of Black Hollywood” for good reason; her screen progeny have included Whitney Houston, Angela Bassett, and Tupac Shakur. In her latest turn, she’s playing the alpha boss of a home-shopping network on the Showtime series “I Love That For You.” It’s no surprise that Lewis keeps getting cast as formidable ladies—the roles come naturally to her, as you’ll hear in her conversation with the </span><i><span>New Yorker</span></i><span> contributor Michael Schulman. Lewis’s new memoir is called “Walking in My Joy: In These Streets.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Actor Jenifer Lewis: Mother, Activist, Hurricane</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Jenifer Lewis is known as the “Mother of Black Hollywood” for good reason; her screen progeny have included Whitney Houston, Angela Bassett, and Tupac Shakur. In her latest turn, she’s playing the alpha boss of a home-shopping network on the Showtime series “I Love That For You.” It’s no surprise that Lewis keeps getting cast as formidable ladies—the roles come naturally to her, as you’ll hear in her conversation with the </span><i><span>New Yorker</span></i><span> contributor Michael Schulman. Lewis’s new memoir is called “Walking in My Joy: In These Streets.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Jenifer Lewis is known as the “Mother of Black Hollywood” for good reason; her screen progeny have included Whitney Houston, Angela Bassett, and Tupac Shakur. In her latest turn, she’s playing the alpha boss of a home-shopping network on the Showtime series “I Love That For You.” It’s no surprise that Lewis keeps getting cast as formidable ladies—the roles come naturally to her, as you’ll hear in her conversation with the New Yorker contributor Michael Schulman. Lewis’s new memoir is called “Walking in My Joy: In These Streets.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>What’s Driving Black Candidates to the Republican Party?
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/whats-driving-black-candidates-republican-party-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Republican Party has recently attracted an almost unprecedented number of Black candidates to its fold—more than at any time since the Reconstruction era. “In a moment where the Party . . . has really wholeheartedly embraced white-grievance politics,” Leah Wright Rigueur tells David Remnick, “they are endorsing more Black candidates than they have in the past twenty-five years.” Rigueur is a historian at Johns Hopkins University and the author of “The Loneliness of the Black Republican.” The G.O.P., she argues, is exploiting a moment when the long-standing relationship between Black Americans and the Democratic Party is weakening, and it aims to capitalize on an “everyday conservatism” among voters. “It actually makes sense that in the aftermath of Barack Obama—with Black people’s levels of support and warmth for the Democratic Party in decline and the belief among a small sect of African Americans that [it] is just as racist as the Republican Party—that actually frees some people up to actually vote Republican.” Plus, the staff writer Emma Green, who covers the pro-life movement, discusses how individuals’ positions seldom reflect the furious partisan divide, and she shares some nuanced sources that have informed her reporting.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9172dae5-7de8-4466-a2b3-49d4e6c212c9</guid><enclosure length="28912000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour082322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1241205"/><category>abortion</category><category>black</category><category>candidate</category><category>health</category><category>politics</category><category>reproductive_rights</category><category>republican_party</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour082322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1241205"/><media:description type="plain">What’s Driving Black Candidates to the Republican Party?
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2022/08/Leah_Wright_Rigeuer_Martha_Stewart.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>30:07</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The Republican Party has recently attracted an almost unprecedented number of Black candidates to its fold—more than at any time since the Reconstruction era. “In a moment where the Party . . . has really wholeheartedly embraced white-grievance politics,” Leah Wright Rigueur tells David Remnick, “they are endorsing more Black candidates than they have in the past twenty-five years.” Rigueur is a historian at Johns Hopkins University and the author of “The Loneliness of the Black Republican.” The G.O.P., she argues, is exploiting a moment when the long-standing relationship between Black Americans and the Democratic Party is weakening, and it aims to capitalize on an “everyday conservatism” among voters. “It actually makes sense that in the aftermath of Barack Obama—with Black people’s levels of support and warmth for the Democratic Party in decline and the belief among a small sect of African Americans that [it] is just as racist as the Republican Party—that actually frees some people up to actually vote Republican.” Plus, the staff writer Emma Green, who covers the pro-life movement, discusses how individuals’ positions seldom reflect the furious partisan divide, and she shares some nuanced sources that have informed her reporting.  </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>What’s Driving Black Candidates to the Republican Party?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The Republican Party has recently attracted an almost unprecedented number of Black candidates to its fold—more than at any time since the Reconstruction era. “In a moment where the Party . . . has really wholeheartedly embraced white-grievance politics,” Leah Wright Rigueur tells David Remnick, “they are endorsing more Black candidates than they have in the past twenty-five years.” Rigueur is a historian at Johns Hopkins University and the author of “The Loneliness of the Black Republican.” The G.O.P., she argues, is exploiting a moment when the long-standing relationship between Black Americans and the Democratic Party is weakening, and it aims to capitalize on an “everyday conservatism” among voters. “It actually makes sense that in the aftermath of Barack Obama—with Black people’s levels of support and warmth for the Democratic Party in decline and the belief among a small sect of African Americans that [it] is just as racist as the Republican Party—that actually frees some people up to actually vote Republican.” Plus, the staff writer Emma Green, who covers the pro-life movement, discusses how individuals’ positions seldom reflect the furious partisan divide, and she shares some nuanced sources that have informed her reporting.  </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The Republican Party has recently attracted an almost unprecedented number of Black candidates to its fold—more than at any time since the Reconstruction era. “In a moment where the Party . . . has really wholeheartedly embraced white-grievance politics,” Leah Wright Rigueur tells David Remnick, “they are endorsing more Black candidates than they have in the past twenty-five years.” Rigueur is a historian at Johns Hopkins University and the author of “The Loneliness of the Black Republican.” The G.O.P., she argues, is exploiting a moment when the long-standing relationship between Black Americans and the Democratic Party is weakening, and it aims to capitalize on an “everyday conservatism” among voters. “It actually makes sense that in the aftermath of Barack Obama—with Black people’s levels of support and warmth for the Democratic Party in decline and the belief among a small sect of African Americans that [it] is just as racist as the Republican Party—that actually frees some people up to actually vote Republican.” Plus, the staff writer Emma Green, who covers the pro-life movement, discusses how individuals’ positions seldom reflect the furious partisan divide, and she shares some nuanced sources that have informed her reporting. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Neil Gaiman on the Power of Fantasy in our Lives
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/neil-gaiman-power-fantasy-our-lives-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Neil Gaiman, one of the great fantasy writers of our time, first started writing his comic series “The Sandman” in the nineteen-eightiess. Decades later, a TV adaptation is a huge hit on Netflix, topping the platform’s charts in countries across the globe. Gaiman talks with the producer Ngofeen Mputubwele about the powerful role that fantasy can play in helping audiences process real experiences in their lives. “You’re making things that aren’t true,” he says, “and you’re giving them to people in order to allow them to see—we hope—greater truths.” Though the Netflix début marks a major expansion of “The Sandman” ’s visibility, the series has long attracted audiences beyond ardent comic fans. Looking back to the early success of his comics, Gaiman recalls, “I would go to conventions and large, sweaty gentlemen would come over to me, grab my hands and say, ‘You brought women into my store. . . . Let me shake your hand.’ ”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">374c8877-0220-40d2-a03a-ca4e33b04352</guid><enclosure length="18000000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour081922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1241195"/><category>arts</category><category>comic_books</category><category>comics</category><category>drama</category><category>fantasy</category><category>graphic_novel</category><category>neil_gaiman</category><category>netflix</category><category>television</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour081922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1241195"/><media:description type="plain">Neil Gaiman on the Power of Fantasy in our Lives
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/08/NYRH_Gaiman.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>18:45</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Neil Gaiman, one of the great fantasy writers of our time, first started writing his comic series “The Sandman” in the nineteen-eightiess. Decades later, a TV adaptation is a huge hit on Netflix, topping the platform’s charts in countries across the globe. Gaiman talks with the producer Ngofeen Mputubwele about the powerful role that fantasy can play in helping audiences process real experiences in their lives. “You’re making things that aren’t true,” he says, “and you’re giving them to people in order to allow them to see—we hope—greater truths.” Though the Netflix début marks a major expansion of “The Sandman” ’s visibility, the series has long attracted audiences beyond ardent comic fans. Looking back to the early success of his comics, Gaiman recalls, “I would go to conventions and large, sweaty gentlemen would come over to me, grab my hands and say, ‘You brought women into my store. . . . Let me shake your hand.’ ”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Neil Gaiman on the Power of Fantasy in our Lives</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Neil Gaiman, one of the great fantasy writers of our time, first started writing his comic series “The Sandman” in the nineteen-eightiess. Decades later, a TV adaptation is a huge hit on Netflix, topping the platform’s charts in countries across the globe. Gaiman talks with the producer Ngofeen Mputubwele about the powerful role that fantasy can play in helping audiences process real experiences in their lives. “You’re making things that aren’t true,” he says, “and you’re giving them to people in order to allow them to see—we hope—greater truths.” Though the Netflix début marks a major expansion of “The Sandman” ’s visibility, the series has long attracted audiences beyond ardent comic fans. Looking back to the early success of his comics, Gaiman recalls, “I would go to conventions and large, sweaty gentlemen would come over to me, grab my hands and say, ‘You brought women into my store. . . . Let me shake your hand.’ ”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Neil Gaiman, one of the great fantasy writers of our time, first started writing his comic series “The Sandman” in the nineteen-eightiess. Decades later, a TV adaptation is a huge hit on Netflix, topping the platform’s charts in countries across the globe. Gaiman talks with the producer Ngofeen Mputubwele about the powerful role that fantasy can play in helping audiences process real experiences in their lives. “You’re making things that aren’t true,” he says, “and you’re giving them to people in order to allow them to see—we hope—greater truths.” Though the Netflix début marks a major expansion of “The Sandman” ’s visibility, the series has long attracted audiences beyond ardent comic fans. Looking back to the early success of his comics, Gaiman recalls, “I would go to conventions and large, sweaty gentlemen would come over to me, grab my hands and say, ‘You brought women into my store. . . . Let me shake your hand.’ ”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Designing a Soundscape for the Cars of the Future
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/designing-soundscape-cars-future-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Electric cars, compared to cars with internal-combustion engines, are nearly silent, which can present a danger to cyclists and pedestrians. So car companies are turning to sound engineers to craft artificial soundtracks for things like backing up, or starting the engine. John Seabrook, who writes often about music, reported on the composers and designers who are building a new soundscape for the streets and highways of America. Plus, a visit with Ada Limón, who was recently named the twenty-fourth U.S. Poet Laureate. Limón lives in Kentucky, and in 2018 she took the Radio Hour to her favorite racetrack, and spoke about her lifelong love of horses. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">27b7eacb-2274-4d98-8226-12ce47f12dc3</guid><enclosure length="21808000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour081622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1238621"/><category>arts</category><category>electric_vehicles</category><category>environment</category><category>horse_racing</category><category>sports</category><category>technology</category><category>transportation</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour081622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1238621"/><media:description type="plain">Designing a Soundscape for the Cars of the Future
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/08/NYRH_ElectricVehicleSoundscape.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>22:43</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Electric cars, compared to cars with internal-combustion engines, are nearly silent, which can present a danger to cyclists and pedestrians. So car companies are turning to sound engineers to craft artificial soundtracks for things like backing up, or starting the engine. John Seabrook, who writes often about music, reported on the composers and designers who are building a new soundscape for the streets and highways of America. Plus, a visit with Ada Limón, who was recently named the twenty-fourth U.S. Poet Laureate. Limón lives in Kentucky, and in 2018 she took the Radio Hour to her favorite racetrack, and spoke about her lifelong love of horses. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Designing a Soundscape for the Cars of the Future</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Electric cars, compared to cars with internal-combustion engines, are nearly silent, which can present a danger to cyclists and pedestrians. So car companies are turning to sound engineers to craft artificial soundtracks for things like backing up, or starting the engine. John Seabrook, who writes often about music, reported on the composers and designers who are building a new soundscape for the streets and highways of America. Plus, a visit with Ada Limón, who was recently named the twenty-fourth U.S. Poet Laureate. Limón lives in Kentucky, and in 2018 she took the Radio Hour to her favorite racetrack, and spoke about her lifelong love of horses. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Electric cars, compared to cars with internal-combustion engines, are nearly silent, which can present a danger to cyclists and pedestrians. So car companies are turning to sound engineers to craft artificial soundtracks for things like backing up, or starting the engine. John Seabrook, who writes often about music, reported on the composers and designers who are building a new soundscape for the streets and highways of America. Plus, a visit with Ada Limón, who was recently named the twenty-fourth U.S. Poet Laureate. Limón lives in Kentucky, and in 2018 she took the Radio Hour to her favorite racetrack, and spoke about her lifelong love of horses.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Elizabeth Kolbert on a Historic Climate Bill, Plus a Lesson from Kansas
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/elizabeth-kolbert-historic-climate-bill-plus-lesson-from-kansas/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Inflation Reduction Act now before Congress is being celebrated as the most important piece of climate legislation in the history of this country—which is “a pretty low bar,” the staff writer and Pulitzer Prize-winner Elizabeth Kolbert tells David Remnick, “because they’ve never really passed a piece of legislation on climate change.” The Inflation Reduction Act is a huge political victory for Democrats; will it help save the planet? And we look at how pro-choice messaging in Kansas delivered a surprise victory for reproductive choice by borrowing a classic conservative theme: government overreach.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5e982228-b9de-45ff-8d3a-f9f1ec447dfd</guid><enclosure length="26592000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour081222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1238611"/><category>climate_change</category><category>congress</category><category>environment</category><category>legislation</category><category>politics</category><category>reproductive_rights</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour081222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1238611"/><media:description type="plain">Elizabeth Kolbert on a Historic Climate Bill, Plus a Lesson from Kansas
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/08/Slevin_Kansas_AP_Charlie_Riedel.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>27:42</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The Inflation Reduction Act now before Congress is being celebrated as the most important piece of climate legislation in the history of this country—which is “a pretty low bar,” the staff writer and Pulitzer Prize-winner Elizabeth Kolbert tells David Remnick, “because they’ve never really passed a piece of legislation on climate change.” The Inflation Reduction Act is a huge political victory for Democrats; will it help save the planet? And we look at how pro-choice messaging in Kansas delivered a surprise victory for reproductive choice by borrowing a classic conservative theme: government overreach.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Elizabeth Kolbert on a Historic Climate Bill, Plus a Lesson from Kansas</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The Inflation Reduction Act now before Congress is being celebrated as the most important piece of climate legislation in the history of this country—which is “a pretty low bar,” the staff writer and Pulitzer Prize-winner Elizabeth Kolbert tells David Remnick, “because they’ve never really passed a piece of legislation on climate change.” The Inflation Reduction Act is a huge political victory for Democrats; will it help save the planet? And we look at how pro-choice messaging in Kansas delivered a surprise victory for reproductive choice by borrowing a classic conservative theme: government overreach.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The Inflation Reduction Act now before Congress is being celebrated as the most important piece of climate legislation in the history of this country—which is “a pretty low bar,” the staff writer and Pulitzer Prize-winner Elizabeth Kolbert tells David Remnick, “because they’ve never really passed a piece of legislation on climate change.” The Inflation Reduction Act is a huge political victory for Democrats; will it help save the planet? And we look at how pro-choice messaging in Kansas delivered a surprise victory for reproductive choice by borrowing a classic conservative theme: government overreach.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>A Trip to the Boundary Waters
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/trip-boundary-waters-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Alex Kotlowitz is known as a chronicler of the city of Chicago, and of lives marred by urban poverty and violence. His books set in Chicago include “An American Summer,” “There Are No Children Here,” and “Never a City So Real.” But for some 40 years, he has returned to a remote stretch of woods summer after summer. At a young age, he found himself navigating a canoe through a series of lakes, deep in the woods along Minnesota’s border with Canada. The stretch of wilderness is known as the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Larger than the state of Rhode Island, it is a patchwork of more than a thousand lakes, so pristine you can drink directly from the surface. At the age of sixty-seven, he finds the days of paddling, the leaky tents, the long portages, the schlepping of days’ worth of food (and alcohol) harder, but Kotlowitz will return to the Boundary Waters as long as he can. This spring, he brought a recorder with him on his annual canoe trip, capturing what has kept him coming back year after year. Plus, Susan Orlean remembers Ivana Trump, who died last month, at the age of 73.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">bedcc9d5-b799-46e7-91c1-6349f3fc48e6</guid><enclosure length="23984000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour080922b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1236381"/><category>alex_kotlowitz</category><category>boundary_waters</category><category>canoe</category><category>environment</category><category>ivana_trump</category><category>minnesota</category><category>outdoors</category><category>susan_orlean</category><category>wilderness</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour080922b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1236381"/><media:description type="plain">A Trip to the Boundary Waters
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/08/NYRH_BoundaryWaters.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>24:59</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Alex Kotlowitz is known as a chronicler of the city of Chicago, and of lives marred by urban poverty and violence. His books set in Chicago include “An American Summer,” “There Are No Children Here,” and “Never a City So Real.” But for some 40 years, he has returned to a remote stretch of woods summer after summer. At a young age, he found himself navigating a canoe through a series of lakes, deep in the woods along Minnesota’s border with Canada. The stretch of wilderness is known as the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Larger than the state of Rhode Island, it is a patchwork of more than a thousand lakes, so pristine you can drink directly from the surface. At the age of sixty-seven, he finds the days of paddling, the leaky tents, the long portages, the schlepping of days’ worth of food (and alcohol) harder, but Kotlowitz will return to the Boundary Waters as long as he can. This spring, he brought a recorder with him on his annual canoe trip, capturing what has kept him coming back year after year. Plus, Susan Orlean remembers Ivana Trump, who died last month, at the age of 73.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>A Trip to the Boundary Waters</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Alex Kotlowitz is known as a chronicler of the city of Chicago, and of lives marred by urban poverty and violence. His books set in Chicago include “An American Summer,” “There Are No Children Here,” and “Never a City So Real.” But for some 40 years, he has returned to a remote stretch of woods summer after summer. At a young age, he found himself navigating a canoe through a series of lakes, deep in the woods along Minnesota’s border with Canada. The stretch of wilderness is known as the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Larger than the state of Rhode Island, it is a patchwork of more than a thousand lakes, so pristine you can drink directly from the surface. At the age of sixty-seven, he finds the days of paddling, the leaky tents, the long portages, the schlepping of days’ worth of food (and alcohol) harder, but Kotlowitz will return to the Boundary Waters as long as he can. This spring, he brought a recorder with him on his annual canoe trip, capturing what has kept him coming back year after year. Plus, Susan Orlean remembers Ivana Trump, who died last month, at the age of 73.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Alex Kotlowitz is known as a chronicler of the city of Chicago, and of lives marred by urban poverty and violence. His books set in Chicago include “An American Summer,” “There Are No Children Here,” and “Never a City So Real.” But for some 40 years, he has returned to a remote stretch of woods summer after summer. At a young age, he found himself navigating a canoe through a series of lakes, deep in the woods along Minnesota’s border with Canada. The stretch of wilderness is known as the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Larger than the state of Rhode Island, it is a patchwork of more than a thousand lakes, so pristine you can drink directly from the surface. At the age of sixty-seven, he finds the days of paddling, the leaky tents, the long portages, the schlepping of days’ worth of food (and alcohol) harder, but Kotlowitz will return to the Boundary Waters as long as he can. This spring, he brought a recorder with him on his annual canoe trip, capturing what has kept him coming back year after year. Plus, Susan Orlean remembers Ivana Trump, who died last month, at the age of 73.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Jane Mayer on Ohio’s Lurch to the Right
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/jane-mayer-ohios-lurch-right/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Last month, the story of a 10-year-old rape victim captured national headlines. The young girl was forced to travel out of state because of Ohio’s draconian abortion ban with no exceptions for rape or incest, which would have been nearly unthinkable until very recently. Jane Mayer took a deep dive into statehouse politics to learn how a longtime swing state—Ohio voted twice for President Barack Obama—ended up legislating like a radically conservative one. Its laws, she says, are increasingly out of step with the state’s voters, and this is owing to a sweeping Republican effort at gerrymandering. While familiar, gerrymandering “has become much more of a dark art,” Mayer tells David Remnick, “thanks to computers and digital mapping. They have figured out ways now to do it that are so extreme, you can create districts [in which the incumbent] cannot be knocked out by someone from another party.” Mayer also speaks with David Pepper, an Ohio politician and the author of “Laboratories of Autocracy,” who explains how a district is firmly controlled by one party, the representative is driven by the primary process inexorably toward extremism, until you have “a complete meltdown of democracy.”&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944ce547-a11d-45dc-9637-63ed7280650e</guid><enclosure length="24144000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour080522b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1236377"/><category>abortion</category><category>autocracy</category><category>democracy</category><category>extremism</category><category>gerrymandering</category><category>jane_mayer</category><category>ohio</category><category>politics</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour080522b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1236377"/><media:description type="plain">Jane Mayer on Ohio’s Lurch to the Right
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/08/Ohio_PhotoCred_David_Richard_AP_Photos.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>25:09</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month, the story of a 10-year-old rape victim captured national headlines. The young girl was forced to travel out of state because of Ohio’s draconian abortion ban with no exceptions for rape or incest, which would have been nearly unthinkable until very recently. Jane Mayer took a deep dive into statehouse politics to learn how a longtime swing state—Ohio voted twice for President Barack Obama—ended up legislating like a radically conservative one. Its laws, she says, are increasingly out of step with the state’s voters, and this is owing to a sweeping Republican effort at gerrymandering. While familiar, gerrymandering “has become much more of a dark art,” Mayer tells David Remnick, “thanks to computers and digital mapping. They have figured out ways now to do it that are so extreme, you can create districts [in which the incumbent] cannot be knocked out by someone from another party.” Mayer also speaks with David Pepper, an Ohio politician and the author of “Laboratories of Autocracy,” who explains how a district is firmly controlled by one party, the representative is driven by the primary process inexorably toward extremism, until you have “a complete meltdown of democracy.”</p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Jane Mayer on Ohio’s Lurch to the Right</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>Last month, the story of a 10-year-old rape victim captured national headlines. The young girl was forced to travel out of state because of Ohio’s draconian abortion ban with no exceptions for rape or incest, which would have been nearly unthinkable until very recently. Jane Mayer took a deep dive into statehouse politics to learn how a longtime swing state—Ohio voted twice for President Barack Obama—ended up legislating like a radically conservative one. Its laws, she says, are increasingly out of step with the state’s voters, and this is owing to a sweeping Republican effort at gerrymandering. While familiar, gerrymandering “has become much more of a dark art,” Mayer tells David Remnick, “thanks to computers and digital mapping. They have figured out ways now to do it that are so extreme, you can create districts [in which the incumbent] cannot be knocked out by someone from another party.” Mayer also speaks with David Pepper, an Ohio politician and the author of “Laboratories of Autocracy,” who explains how a district is firmly controlled by one party, the representative is driven by the primary process inexorably toward extremism, until you have “a complete meltdown of democracy.”</p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Last month, the story of a 10-year-old rape victim captured national headlines. The young girl was forced to travel out of state because of Ohio’s draconian abortion ban with no exceptions for rape or incest, which would have been nearly unthinkable until very recently. Jane Mayer took a deep dive into statehouse politics to learn how a longtime swing state—Ohio voted twice for President Barack Obama—ended up legislating like a radically conservative one. Its laws, she says, are increasingly out of step with the state’s voters, and this is owing to a sweeping Republican effort at gerrymandering. While familiar, gerrymandering “has become much more of a dark art,” Mayer tells David Remnick, “thanks to computers and digital mapping. They have figured out ways now to do it that are so extreme, you can create districts [in which the incumbent] cannot be knocked out by someone from another party.” Mayer also speaks with David Pepper, an Ohio politician and the author of “Laboratories of Autocracy,” who explains how a district is firmly controlled by one party, the representative is driven by the primary process inexorably toward extremism, until you have “a complete meltdown of democracy.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Notes from a Warming World
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/notes-warming-world-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Much of the globe has seen record-breaking temperatures in recent heat waves that seem increasingly routine. Dhruv Khullar, a contributor and a practicing physician, looks at the effects of extreme heat in India, where the capital, New Delhi, recorded a temperature this year of 122 degrees. “People are amazingly resilient,” he notes. “But I think we’re approaching that point where even the most resilient people, the type of lives that they have to live—because of climate change—are not going to be sustainable for very much longer.” And the climate activist Daniel Sherrell talks about his book “Warmth: Coming of Age at the End of the World” with Ngofeen Mputubwele. The book articulates Sherrell’s view that we can live now only by walking a tightrope between hope and despair.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">be6a49f6-4cb5-403a-842d-912dc9086903</guid><enclosure length="30768000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour080222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1233973"/><category>climate_change</category><category>environment</category><category>health</category><category>india</category><category>memoir</category><category>new_dehli</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour080222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1233973"/><media:description type="plain">Notes from a Warming World
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/07/NYRH_climate_change_bird.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>32:03</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Much of the globe has seen record-breaking temperatures in recent heat waves that seem increasingly routine. Dhruv Khullar, a contributor and a practicing physician, looks at the effects of extreme heat in India, where the capital, New Delhi, recorded a temperature this year of 122 degrees. “People are amazingly resilient,” he notes. “But I think we’re approaching that point where even the most resilient people, the type of lives that they have to live—because of climate change—are not going to be sustainable for very much longer.” And the climate activist Daniel Sherrell talks about his book “Warmth: Coming of Age at the End of the World” with Ngofeen Mputubwele. The book articulates Sherrell’s view that we can live now only by walking a tightrope between hope and despair.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Notes from a Warming World</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Much of the globe has seen record-breaking temperatures in recent heat waves that seem increasingly routine. Dhruv Khullar, a contributor and a practicing physician, looks at the effects of extreme heat in India, where the capital, New Delhi, recorded a temperature this year of 122 degrees. “People are amazingly resilient,” he notes. “But I think we’re approaching that point where even the most resilient people, the type of lives that they have to live—because of climate change—are not going to be sustainable for very much longer.” And the climate activist Daniel Sherrell talks about his book “Warmth: Coming of Age at the End of the World” with Ngofeen Mputubwele. The book articulates Sherrell’s view that we can live now only by walking a tightrope between hope and despair.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Much of the globe has seen record-breaking temperatures in recent heat waves that seem increasingly routine. Dhruv Khullar, a contributor and a practicing physician, looks at the effects of extreme heat in India, where the capital, New Delhi, recorded a temperature this year of 122 degrees. “People are amazingly resilient,” he notes. “But I think we’re approaching that point where even the most resilient people, the type of lives that they have to live—because of climate change—are not going to be sustainable for very much longer.” And the climate activist Daniel Sherrell talks about his book “Warmth: Coming of Age at the End of the World” with Ngofeen Mputubwele. The book articulates Sherrell’s view that we can live now only by walking a tightrope between hope and despair.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Jamie Raskin on the Facts of January 6th, and the Danger Ahead
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/jamie-raskin-facts-january-6th-and-danger-ahead-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jamie Raskin, a Democrat from Maryland, serves on Congress’s Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the Capitol. He spoke with David Remnick about the effort to demonstrate Donald Trump’s culpability in the insurrection in a way that would resonate with voters, and about Trump’s political future. Trump is “guilty as sin, and everybody can see it,” Raskin says, and he is running low on patience for the Department of Justice to act. “As a citizen, I would hope and expect to see action,” Raskin notes, given the committee’s findings. “But I try to be careful not to browbeat the Attorney General of the United States.”&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0dfbd597-cf32-4386-b1a9-7712c6436d5c</guid><enclosure length="17184000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour072922b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1233962"/><category>capitol_attack</category><category>congress</category><category>department_of_justice</category><category>investigation</category><category>jamie_raskin</category><category>january_6th</category><category>politics</category><category>trump</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour072922b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1233962"/><media:description type="plain">Jamie Raskin on the Facts of January 6th, and the Danger Ahead
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/07/Raskin_AP22193696877533.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>17:54</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Jamie Raskin, a Democrat from Maryland, serves on Congress’s Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the Capitol.  He spoke with David Remnick about the effort to demonstrate Donald Trump’s culpability in the insurrection in a way that would resonate with voters, and about Trump’s political future.  Trump is “guilty as sin, and everybody can see it,” Raskin says, and he is running low on patience for the Department of Justice to act.  “As a citizen, I would hope and expect to see action,” Raskin notes, given the committee’s findings. “But I try to be careful not to browbeat the Attorney General of the United States.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Jamie Raskin on the Facts of January 6th, and the Danger Ahead</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Jamie Raskin, a Democrat from Maryland, serves on Congress’s Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the Capitol.  He spoke with David Remnick about the effort to demonstrate Donald Trump’s culpability in the insurrection in a way that would resonate with voters, and about Trump’s political future.  Trump is “guilty as sin, and everybody can see it,” Raskin says, and he is running low on patience for the Department of Justice to act.  “As a citizen, I would hope and expect to see action,” Raskin notes, given the committee’s findings. “But I try to be careful not to browbeat the Attorney General of the United States.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Jamie Raskin, a Democrat from Maryland, serves on Congress’s Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the Capitol. He spoke with David Remnick about the effort to demonstrate Donald Trump’s culpability in the insurrection in a way that would resonate with voters, and about Trump’s political future. Trump is “guilty as sin, and everybody can see it,” Raskin says, and he is running low on patience for the Department of Justice to act. “As a citizen, I would hope and expect to see action,” Raskin notes, given the committee’s findings. “But I try to be careful not to browbeat the Attorney General of the United States.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Jason Isbell on Songwriting While Sober
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/jason-isbell-songwriting-while-sober-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jason Isbell got into the music business early; he had a publishing deal when he was twenty-one. But he really came into his own as a songwriter around ten years ago, as he was getting sober from years of alcohol and drug use. His record “Southeastern,” which comes in the tradition of musicians like Guy Clark, swept the Americana Music Awards in 2014. Isbell spoke with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/john-seabrook"&gt;&lt;span&gt;John Seabrook&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; at The New Yorker Festival in 2016, shortly after his record “Something More than Free” was released, and he played a live set of songs including “Different Days,” “How to Forget,” and “Speed Trap Town.”  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment first aired December 30, 2016.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6e99dfc9-8d3d-4b9c-81f6-50e88433552e</guid><enclosure length="34608000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour072622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1231547"/><category>americana</category><category>jason_isbell</category><category>live_music</category><category>music</category><category>sober</category><category>sobriety</category><category>songwriter</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour072622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1231547"/><media:description type="plain">Jason Isbell on Songwriting While Sober
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/07/NYRH_JasonIsbell.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>36:03</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Jason Isbell got into the music business early; he had a publishing deal when he was twenty-one. But he really came into his own as a songwriter around ten years ago, as he was getting sober from years of alcohol and drug use. His record “Southeastern,” which comes in the tradition of musicians like Guy Clark, swept the Americana Music Awards in 2014. Isbell spoke with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/john-seabrook"><span>John Seabrook</span></a><span> at The New Yorker Festival in 2016, shortly after his record “Something More than Free” was released, and he played a live set of songs including “Different Days,” “How to Forget,” and “Speed Trap Town.”  </span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment first aired December 30, 2016.</span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Jason Isbell on Songwriting While Sober</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Jason Isbell got into the music business early; he had a publishing deal when he was twenty-one. But he really came into his own as a songwriter around ten years ago, as he was getting sober from years of alcohol and drug use. His record “Southeastern,” which comes in the tradition of musicians like Guy Clark, swept the Americana Music Awards in 2014. Isbell spoke with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/john-seabrook"><span>John Seabrook</span></a><span> at The New Yorker Festival in 2016, shortly after his record “Something More than Free” was released, and he played a live set of songs including “Different Days,” “How to Forget,” and “Speed Trap Town.”  </span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment first aired December 30, 2016.</span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Jason Isbell got into the music business early; he had a publishing deal when he was twenty-one. But he really came into his own as a songwriter around ten years ago, as he was getting sober from years of alcohol and drug use. His record “Southeastern,” which comes in the tradition of musicians like Guy Clark, swept the Americana Music Awards in 2014. Isbell spoke with John Seabrook at The New Yorker Festival in 2016, shortly after his record “Something More than Free” was released, and he played a live set of songs including “Different Days,” “How to Forget,” and “Speed Trap Town.”   This segment first aired December 30, 2016.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>New Mexico Is a “Safe Haven” for Abortion Between Texas and Arizona
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/new-mexico-safe-haven-abortion-between-texas-and-arizona-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In New Mexico, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham has declared the state a “reproductive safe haven” between Arizona to the west, and Texas to the east. Already, she says, New Mexico’s few abortion clinics are seeing an influx of patients from outside its borders. “When you are a safe-haven state,” she says, “you put real stress on [the] current provider system.” Lujan Grisham speaks with David Remnick about her executive order—issued days after the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs—to prevent the extradition of abortion providers, a request that she expects to see from Texas law enforcement. Dobbs puts states at odds over one of the contentious issues of our time. “They’ve invited states now to fight with each other, sue each other,” she says; this is “the most despicable and horrible aspect, frankly, of this particular decision.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fc6f9d64-c66c-4afe-8784-1c9dd3525853</guid><enclosure length="13424000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour072222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1231542"/><category>abortion</category><category>abortion_rights</category><category>arizona</category><category>health</category><category>new_mexico</category><category>politics</category><category>texas</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour072222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1231542"/><media:description type="plain">New Mexico Is a “Safe Haven” for Abortion Between Texas and Arizona
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/07/GrishamAP22178808772268.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>13:59</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>In New Mexico, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham has declared the state a “reproductive safe haven” between Arizona to the west, and Texas to the east. Already, she says, New Mexico’s few abortion clinics are seeing an influx of patients from outside its borders. “When you are a safe-haven state,” she says, “you put real stress on [the] current provider system.” Lujan Grisham speaks with David Remnick about her executive order—issued days after the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs—to prevent the extradition of abortion providers, a request that she expects to see from Texas law enforcement. Dobbs puts states at odds over one of the contentious issues of our time. “They’ve invited states now to fight with each other, sue each other,” she says; this is “the most despicable and horrible aspect, frankly, of this particular decision.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>New Mexico Is a “Safe Haven” for Abortion Between Texas and Arizona</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>In New Mexico, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham has declared the state a “reproductive safe haven” between Arizona to the west, and Texas to the east. Already, she says, New Mexico’s few abortion clinics are seeing an influx of patients from outside its borders. “When you are a safe-haven state,” she says, “you put real stress on [the] current provider system.” Lujan Grisham speaks with David Remnick about her executive order—issued days after the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs—to prevent the extradition of abortion providers, a request that she expects to see from Texas law enforcement. Dobbs puts states at odds over one of the contentious issues of our time. “They’ve invited states now to fight with each other, sue each other,” she says; this is “the most despicable and horrible aspect, frankly, of this particular decision.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>In New Mexico, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham has declared the state a “reproductive safe haven” between Arizona to the west, and Texas to the east. Already, she says, New Mexico’s few abortion clinics are seeing an influx of patients from outside its borders. “When you are a safe-haven state,” she says, “you put real stress on [the] current provider system.” Lujan Grisham speaks with David Remnick about her executive order—issued days after the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs—to prevent the extradition of abortion providers, a request that she expects to see from Texas law enforcement. Dobbs puts states at odds over one of the contentious issues of our time. “They’ve invited states now to fight with each other, sue each other,” she says; this is “the most despicable and horrible aspect, frankly, of this particular decision.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Nerdwriter Conquers the Internet, Plus Kelefa Sanneh on Country Radio 
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/nerdwriter-conquers-internet-plus-kelefa-sanneh-country-radio-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Evan Puschak, known on YouTube as the Nerdwriter, posts videos dissecting topics from Shakespeare and Tarkovsky to Superman; from Martin Luther King, Jr., and Bernie Sanders to Donald Trump. The videos are complex; he may spend weeks editing image, sound, and written narration. He spoke with the Radio Hour’s &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.wnycstudios.org/people/ngofeen-mputubwele"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Ngofeen Mputubwele&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; about what drew him to the essay form, and how he’s found success online. “The essay is not a treatise. It’s not a term paper. It’s not something systematically covering everything about a subject,” Puschak says. “It is an inquiry. . . . The cool thing about the video essay is that you are seeing these people’s thoughts articulated with a whole new toolbox.” As much as he loves the video form, Puschak is crossing over into print next month with a book of essays titled “Escape Into Meaning.” Plus, the writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/kelefa-sanneh"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Kelefa Sanneh&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; highlights some notable tracks playing on country radio stations this summer.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0a9dca6d-67a5-4d6d-b0cd-7ea18b47bd66</guid><enclosure length="26864000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour071922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1228934"/><category>arts</category><category>country_music</category><category>essay</category><category>internet</category><category>music</category><category>radio</category><category>technology</category><category>writer</category><category>youtube</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour071922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1228934"/><media:description type="plain">The Nerdwriter Conquers the Internet, Plus Kelefa Sanneh on Country Radio 
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/07/HaileyWhittersAP22163023918463.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>27:59</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Evan Puschak, known on YouTube as the Nerdwriter, posts videos dissecting topics from Shakespeare and Tarkovsky to Superman; from Martin Luther King, Jr., and Bernie Sanders to Donald Trump. The videos are complex; he may spend weeks editing image, sound, and written narration. He spoke with the Radio Hour’s </span><a href="https://www.wnycstudios.org/people/ngofeen-mputubwele"><span>Ngofeen Mputubwele</span></a><span> about what drew him to the essay form, and how he’s found success online. “The essay is not a treatise. It’s not a term paper. It’s not something systematically covering everything about a subject,” Puschak says. “It is an inquiry. . . . The cool thing about the video essay is that you are seeing these people’s thoughts articulated with a whole new toolbox.” As much as he loves the video form, Puschak is crossing over into print next month with a book of essays titled “Escape Into Meaning.” Plus, the writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/kelefa-sanneh"><span>Kelefa Sanneh</span></a><span> highlights some notable tracks playing on country radio stations this summer.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Nerdwriter Conquers the Internet, Plus Kelefa Sanneh on Country Radio </itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Evan Puschak, known on YouTube as the Nerdwriter, posts videos dissecting topics from Shakespeare and Tarkovsky to Superman; from Martin Luther King, Jr., and Bernie Sanders to Donald Trump. The videos are complex; he may spend weeks editing image, sound, and written narration. He spoke with the Radio Hour’s </span><a href="https://www.wnycstudios.org/people/ngofeen-mputubwele"><span>Ngofeen Mputubwele</span></a><span> about what drew him to the essay form, and how he’s found success online. “The essay is not a treatise. It’s not a term paper. It’s not something systematically covering everything about a subject,” Puschak says. “It is an inquiry. . . . The cool thing about the video essay is that you are seeing these people’s thoughts articulated with a whole new toolbox.” As much as he loves the video form, Puschak is crossing over into print next month with a book of essays titled “Escape Into Meaning.” Plus, the writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/kelefa-sanneh"><span>Kelefa Sanneh</span></a><span> highlights some notable tracks playing on country radio stations this summer.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Evan Puschak, known on YouTube as the Nerdwriter, posts videos dissecting topics from Shakespeare and Tarkovsky to Superman; from Martin Luther King, Jr., and Bernie Sanders to Donald Trump. The videos are complex; he may spend weeks editing image, sound, and written narration. He spoke with the Radio Hour’s Ngofeen Mputubwele about what drew him to the essay form, and how he’s found success online. “The essay is not a treatise. It’s not a term paper. It’s not something systematically covering everything about a subject,” Puschak says. “It is an inquiry. . . . The cool thing about the video essay is that you are seeing these people’s thoughts articulated with a whole new toolbox.” As much as he loves the video form, Puschak is crossing over into print next month with a book of essays titled “Escape Into Meaning.” Plus, the writer Kelefa Sanneh highlights some notable tracks playing on country radio stations this summer.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Writer Dmitry Bykov on Putin’s Russia, the Land of the “Most Free Slaves”
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/writer-dmitry-bykov-putins-russia-land-most-free-slaves-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Until very recently, Dmitry Bykov was a huge presence on the Russian literary scene. He is a novelist, a poet, a biographer, and a critic. He was a frequent presence on Echo of Moscow, the liberal radio station that was closed after the invasion of Ukraine, and his blunt political commentary made him an enemy of the regime. Bykov was teaching in the United States, at the Institute for European Studies at Cornell University, when the invasion of Ukraine began, and because of his forthright opposition to it, he may not be able to return home as long as Putin remains in power. Bykov calls Putin’s dictatorship “the final stage of Russian decline.” He blames not only Putin himself but the Russian people for the failure of democracy to take root. “In Russia they have a ch&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;oice: to&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; change the country—change themselves—or to keep Putin. They prefer to keep Putin,” Bykov tells David Remnick. “They’re really ready to die, but not to change their mind.” Most Russians, he continues, seem content “to make Putin responsible for everything, exclaiming, ‘We didn’t know, we couldn’t prevent him.’ ”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">af4475f3-8dd8-4f9a-adce-46911a2449cb</guid><enclosure length="21296000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour071522b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1228922"/><category>dictatorship</category><category>politics</category><category>putin</category><category>russia</category><category>vladimir_putin</category><category>writer</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour071522b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1228922"/><media:description type="plain">The Writer Dmitry Bykov on Putin’s Russia, the Land of the “Most Free Slaves”
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/07/NYRH_PutinDoors.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>22:11</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Until very recently, Dmitry Bykov was a huge presence on the Russian literary scene. He is a novelist, a poet, a biographer, and a critic. He was a frequent presence on Echo of Moscow, the liberal radio station that was closed after the invasion of Ukraine, and his blunt political commentary made him an enemy of the regime. Bykov was teaching in the United States, at the Institute for European Studies at Cornell University, when the invasion of Ukraine began, and because of his forthright opposition to it, he may not be able to return home as long as Putin remains in power. Bykov calls Putin’s dictatorship “the final stage of Russian decline.” He blames not only Putin himself but the Russian people for the failure of democracy to take root. “In Russia they have a ch</span><span>oice: to</span><span> change the country—change themselves—or to keep Putin. They prefer to keep Putin,” Bykov tells David Remnick. “They’re really ready to die, but not to change their mind.” Most Russians, he continues, seem content “to make Putin responsible for everything, exclaiming, ‘We didn’t know, we couldn’t prevent him.’ ”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Writer Dmitry Bykov on Putin’s Russia, the Land of the “Most Free Slaves”</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Until very recently, Dmitry Bykov was a huge presence on the Russian literary scene. He is a novelist, a poet, a biographer, and a critic. He was a frequent presence on Echo of Moscow, the liberal radio station that was closed after the invasion of Ukraine, and his blunt political commentary made him an enemy of the regime. Bykov was teaching in the United States, at the Institute for European Studies at Cornell University, when the invasion of Ukraine began, and because of his forthright opposition to it, he may not be able to return home as long as Putin remains in power. Bykov calls Putin’s dictatorship “the final stage of Russian decline.” He blames not only Putin himself but the Russian people for the failure of democracy to take root. “In Russia they have a ch</span><span>oice: to</span><span> change the country—change themselves—or to keep Putin. They prefer to keep Putin,” Bykov tells David Remnick. “They’re really ready to die, but not to change their mind.” Most Russians, he continues, seem content “to make Putin responsible for everything, exclaiming, ‘We didn’t know, we couldn’t prevent him.’ ”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Until very recently, Dmitry Bykov was a huge presence on the Russian literary scene. He is a novelist, a poet, a biographer, and a critic. He was a frequent presence on Echo of Moscow, the liberal radio station that was closed after the invasion of Ukraine, and his blunt political commentary made him an enemy of the regime. Bykov was teaching in the United States, at the Institute for European Studies at Cornell University, when the invasion of Ukraine began, and because of his forthright opposition to it, he may not be able to return home as long as Putin remains in power. Bykov calls Putin’s dictatorship “the final stage of Russian decline.” He blames not only Putin himself but the Russian people for the failure of democracy to take root. “In Russia they have a choice: to change the country—change themselves—or to keep Putin. They prefer to keep Putin,” Bykov tells David Remnick. “They’re really ready to die, but not to change their mind.” Most Russians, he continues, seem content “to make Putin responsible for everything, exclaiming, ‘We didn’t know, we couldn’t prevent him.’ ”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Comedian Hannah Gadsby Renounces Comedy, and Patricia Marx Tries to Relax
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/comedian-hannah-gadsby-renounces-comedy-and-patricia-marx-tries-relax-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The comedian Hannah Gadsby has been touring this summer with a show called “Body of Work.” She came to wide attention in 2018, with the Netflix special “Nanette.” It was a full-length comedy show, and, at the same time, a carefully structured critique of standup comedy which argued that comedians have to distort personal experience for the sake of a joke, inflicting a kind of violence on themselves and their audiences. Gadsby recently published a memoir about her breakout moment called “Ten Steps to Nanette.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/emily-nussbaum"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Emily Nussbaum&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; talked with Gadsby back in 2018, when “Nanette” had just been released. Plus, Patricia Marx tries the trendy relaxation technique called flotation therapy—formerly known as a sensory deprivation tank. But relaxing, Marx found, is just too stressful, and her microphone was the only thing that found peace.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">55569ad4-f357-4ede-b5c0-a7b58e0f2442</guid><enclosure length="25872000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour071222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1226394"/><category>comedy</category><category>hannah_gadsby</category><category>joke</category><category>patricia_marx</category><category>standup_comedy</category><category>therapy</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour071222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1226394"/><media:description type="plain">The Comedian Hannah Gadsby Renounces Comedy, and Patricia Marx Tries to Relax
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/1/Radio-Hour-Hannah-Gadsby-4x3.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>26:57</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The comedian Hannah Gadsby has been touring this summer with a show called “Body of Work.” She came to wide attention in 2018, with the Netflix special “Nanette.” It was a full-length comedy show, and, at the same time, a carefully structured critique of standup comedy which argued that comedians have to distort personal experience for the sake of a joke, inflicting a kind of violence on themselves and their audiences. Gadsby recently published a memoir about her breakout moment called “Ten Steps to Nanette.” </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i> <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/emily-nussbaum"><span>Emily Nussbaum</span></a><span> talked with Gadsby back in 2018, when “Nanette” had just been released. Plus, Patricia Marx tries the trendy relaxation technique called flotation therapy—formerly known as a sensory deprivation tank. But relaxing, Marx found, is just too stressful, and her microphone was the only thing that found peace.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Comedian Hannah Gadsby Renounces Comedy, and Patricia Marx Tries to Relax</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The comedian Hannah Gadsby has been touring this summer with a show called “Body of Work.” She came to wide attention in 2018, with the Netflix special “Nanette.” It was a full-length comedy show, and, at the same time, a carefully structured critique of standup comedy which argued that comedians have to distort personal experience for the sake of a joke, inflicting a kind of violence on themselves and their audiences. Gadsby recently published a memoir about her breakout moment called “Ten Steps to Nanette.” </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i> <a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/emily-nussbaum"><span>Emily Nussbaum</span></a><span> talked with Gadsby back in 2018, when “Nanette” had just been released. Plus, Patricia Marx tries the trendy relaxation technique called flotation therapy—formerly known as a sensory deprivation tank. But relaxing, Marx found, is just too stressful, and her microphone was the only thing that found peace.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The comedian Hannah Gadsby has been touring this summer with a show called “Body of Work.” She came to wide attention in 2018, with the Netflix special “Nanette.” It was a full-length comedy show, and, at the same time, a carefully structured critique of standup comedy which argued that comedians have to distort personal experience for the sake of a joke, inflicting a kind of violence on themselves and their audiences. Gadsby recently published a memoir about her breakout moment called “Ten Steps to Nanette.” The New Yorker’s Emily Nussbaum talked with Gadsby back in 2018, when “Nanette” had just been released. Plus, Patricia Marx tries the trendy relaxation technique called flotation therapy—formerly known as a sensory deprivation tank. But relaxing, Marx found, is just too stressful, and her microphone was the only thing that found peace.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>What Precedents Would Clarence Thomas Overturn Next?
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/what-precedents-would-clarence-thomas-overturn-next-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Justice Clarence Thomas once was an outlier for his legal views. But Thomas is now the heart of the Court’s conservative bloc, and his concurring opinion in the recent abortion ruling calls out some other precedents the Court might overturn. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jeannie-suk"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jeannie Suk Gersen&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; teaches constitutional law at Harvard Law School and clerked for former Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court; she has been covering the end of Roe v. Wade for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;, and she spoke with David Remnick about Thomas’s concurrence. It articulates a view more extreme than Justice Alito’s majority opinion, saying that other rights derived from privacy—such as contraception and same-sex intimacy—are not constitutional rights at all. “We have to remember he’s been saying it out loud for quite some time,” Suk Gersen says. “This is not a new thing from Justice Thomas. It’s just that we normally—over decades—didn’t pay that much attention to him, because he was alone in his dissents and concurrences.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8929f829-0f83-42c0-8f50-c6a858a44c4c</guid><enclosure length="22896000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour070822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1226385"/><category>abortion</category><category>clarence_thomas</category><category>constitution</category><category>health</category><category>politics</category><category>privacy</category><category>rights</category><category>supreme_court</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour070822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1226385"/><media:description type="plain">What Precedents Would Clarence Thomas Overturn Next?
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2022/07/NYRH_Woman_Court.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>23:51</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Justice Clarence Thomas once was an outlier for his legal views. But Thomas is now the heart of the Court’s conservative bloc, and his concurring opinion in the recent abortion ruling calls out some other precedents the Court might overturn. </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jeannie-suk"><span>Jeannie Suk Gersen</span></a><span> teaches constitutional law at Harvard Law School and clerked for former Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court; she has been covering the end of Roe v. Wade for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span>, and she spoke with David Remnick about Thomas’s concurrence. It articulates a view more extreme than Justice Alito’s majority opinion, saying that other rights derived from privacy—such as contraception and same-sex intimacy—are not constitutional rights at all. “We have to remember he’s been saying it out loud for quite some time,” Suk Gersen says. “This is not a new thing from Justice Thomas. It’s just that we normally—over decades—didn’t pay that much attention to him, because he was alone in his dissents and concurrences.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>What Precedents Would Clarence Thomas Overturn Next?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Justice Clarence Thomas once was an outlier for his legal views. But Thomas is now the heart of the Court’s conservative bloc, and his concurring opinion in the recent abortion ruling calls out some other precedents the Court might overturn. </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jeannie-suk"><span>Jeannie Suk Gersen</span></a><span> teaches constitutional law at Harvard Law School and clerked for former Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court; she has been covering the end of Roe v. Wade for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span>, and she spoke with David Remnick about Thomas’s concurrence. It articulates a view more extreme than Justice Alito’s majority opinion, saying that other rights derived from privacy—such as contraception and same-sex intimacy—are not constitutional rights at all. “We have to remember he’s been saying it out loud for quite some time,” Suk Gersen says. “This is not a new thing from Justice Thomas. It’s just that we normally—over decades—didn’t pay that much attention to him, because he was alone in his dissents and concurrences.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Justice Clarence Thomas once was an outlier for his legal views. But Thomas is now the heart of the Court’s conservative bloc, and his concurring opinion in the recent abortion ruling calls out some other precedents the Court might overturn. Jeannie Suk Gersen teaches constitutional law at Harvard Law School and clerked for former Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court; she has been covering the end of Roe v. Wade for The New Yorker, and she spoke with David Remnick about Thomas’s concurrence. It articulates a view more extreme than Justice Alito’s majority opinion, saying that other rights derived from privacy—such as contraception and same-sex intimacy—are not constitutional rights at all. “We have to remember he’s been saying it out loud for quite some time,” Suk Gersen says. “This is not a new thing from Justice Thomas. It’s just that we normally—over decades—didn’t pay that much attention to him, because he was alone in his dissents and concurrences.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Astrid Holleeder’s Crime Family
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/astrid-holleeders-crime-family-podcast-22/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;All her life, Astrid Holleeder knew that her older brother Willem was involved in crime. But she was stunned when, in 1983, Willem and his best friend, Cornelius van Hout, were revealed to be the masterminds behind the audacious kidnapping of the beer magnate Alfred Heineken. It was the beginning of a successful career for Willem, known as Wim. After a stay in prison, he became a celebrity criminal; he had a newspaper column, appeared on talk shows, and took selfies with admirers in Amsterdam. He got rich off of his investments in the sex trade and other businesses, but kept them well hidden. But when van Hout was assassinated and other associates started turning up dead, Astrid suspected that her brother had committed the murders. She decided to wear a wire and gather the evidence to put him away. If that didn't work, Astrid tells staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/patrick-radden-keefe"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Patrick Radden Keefe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, she would have to kill Willem herself. After Astrid testified against him, Willem was convicted of multiple murders. Living in hiding, and travelling in disguise, she tells Keefe the story of her complicity and its consequences. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Keefe’s &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; story &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/08/06/how-a-notorious-gangster-was-exposed-by-his-own-sister"&gt;&lt;span&gt;about Astrid Holleeder&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; appears in his new collection, “Rogues: True Stories of Grifters, Killers, Rebels, and Crooks.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment originally aired August 3, 2018.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b58060cb-c2ce-4645-af76-93af3f47fe77</guid><enclosure length="29856000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour070522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1224836"/><category>amsterdam</category><category>celebrity</category><category>crime</category><category>criminal</category><category>history</category><category>life</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour070522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1224836"/><media:description type="plain">Astrid Holleeder’s Crime Family
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2018/08/Radio-Hour-Keefe-4x3.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>31:06</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>All her life, Astrid Holleeder knew that her older brother Willem was involved in crime. But she was stunned when, in 1983, Willem and his best friend, Cornelius van Hout, were revealed to be the masterminds behind the audacious kidnapping of the beer magnate Alfred Heineken. It was the beginning of a successful career for Willem, known as Wim. After a stay in prison, he became a celebrity criminal; he had a newspaper column, appeared on talk shows, and took selfies with admirers in Amsterdam. He got rich off of his investments in the sex trade and other businesses, but kept them well hidden. But when van Hout was assassinated and other associates started turning up dead, Astrid suspected that her brother had committed the murders. She decided to wear a wire and gather the evidence to put him away. If that didn't work, Astrid tells staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/patrick-radden-keefe"><span>Patrick Radden Keefe</span></a><span>, she would have to kill Willem herself. After Astrid testified against him, Willem was convicted of multiple murders. Living in hiding, and travelling in disguise, she tells Keefe the story of her complicity and its consequences. </span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span>Keefe’s </span><i><span>New Yorker</span></i><span> story </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/08/06/how-a-notorious-gangster-was-exposed-by-his-own-sister"><span>about Astrid Holleeder</span></a><span> appears in his new collection, “Rogues: True Stories of Grifters, Killers, Rebels, and Crooks.”</span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired August 3, 2018.</span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Astrid Holleeder’s Crime Family</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>All her life, Astrid Holleeder knew that her older brother Willem was involved in crime. But she was stunned when, in 1983, Willem and his best friend, Cornelius van Hout, were revealed to be the masterminds behind the audacious kidnapping of the beer magnate Alfred Heineken. It was the beginning of a successful career for Willem, known as Wim. After a stay in prison, he became a celebrity criminal; he had a newspaper column, appeared on talk shows, and took selfies with admirers in Amsterdam. He got rich off of his investments in the sex trade and other businesses, but kept them well hidden. But when van Hout was assassinated and other associates started turning up dead, Astrid suspected that her brother had committed the murders. She decided to wear a wire and gather the evidence to put him away. If that didn't work, Astrid tells staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/patrick-radden-keefe"><span>Patrick Radden Keefe</span></a><span>, she would have to kill Willem herself. After Astrid testified against him, Willem was convicted of multiple murders. Living in hiding, and travelling in disguise, she tells Keefe the story of her complicity and its consequences. </span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span>Keefe’s </span><i><span>New Yorker</span></i><span> story </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/08/06/how-a-notorious-gangster-was-exposed-by-his-own-sister"><span>about Astrid Holleeder</span></a><span> appears in his new collection, “Rogues: True Stories of Grifters, Killers, Rebels, and Crooks.”</span></p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired August 3, 2018.</span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>All her life, Astrid Holleeder knew that her older brother Willem was involved in crime. But she was stunned when, in 1983, Willem and his best friend, Cornelius van Hout, were revealed to be the masterminds behind the audacious kidnapping of the beer magnate Alfred Heineken. It was the beginning of a successful career for Willem, known as Wim. After a stay in prison, he became a celebrity criminal; he had a newspaper column, appeared on talk shows, and took selfies with admirers in Amsterdam. He got rich off of his investments in the sex trade and other businesses, but kept them well hidden. But when van Hout was assassinated and other associates started turning up dead, Astrid suspected that her brother had committed the murders. She decided to wear a wire and gather the evidence to put him away. If that didn't work, Astrid tells staff writer Patrick Radden Keefe, she would have to kill Willem herself. After Astrid testified against him, Willem was convicted of multiple murders. Living in hiding, and travelling in disguise, she tells Keefe the story of her complicity and its consequences.  Keefe’s New Yorker story about Astrid Holleeder appears in his new collection, “Rogues: True Stories of Grifters, Killers, Rebels, and Crooks.” This segment originally aired August 3, 2018.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Jia Tolentino and Stephania Taladrid on the End of Roe v. Wade 
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/jia-tolentino-and-stephania-taladrid-end-roe-v-wade-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Supreme Court’s ruling in the Dobbs case was not a surprise; given the draft opinion that was leaked in May, its decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey was nearly a certainty. But the effects of the ruling have been rapid and chaotic. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In some states, abortions stopped overnight; in others, there’s profound confusion over what qualifies as a legally acceptable reason for having an abortion. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Far from settling the legal issue of abortion—by sending it back to the states—the Dobbs ruling opens an uncharted legal dimension where the health of a pregnant person is being pitted against the life of a fetus, with potentially fatal consequences. “Flat out, women will die in the course of ordinary pregnancy,” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jia-tolentino"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jia Tolentino&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; says, “because of physician fears about anything that might make them liable for felony changes of performing an abortion. It will make pregnancy significantly more dangerous for many, many people.” Tolentino and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/stephania-taladrid"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Stephania Taladrid&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; have both reported extensively on abortion access, and they spoke this week with the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;New Yorker &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;editor Tyler Foggatt. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;A longer version of this conversation appears on The New Yorker’s &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/podcast/politics-and-more"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Politics and More&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt; podcast.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6d5daa89-a82d-4fd5-b676-2b363ec86785</guid><enclosure length="18368000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour070122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1224826"/><category>abortion</category><category>dobbs</category><category>health</category><category>planned_parenthood</category><category>politics</category><category>roe_v_wade</category><category>supreme_court</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour070122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1224826"/><media:description type="plain">Jia Tolentino and Stephania Taladrid on the End of Roe v. Wade 
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/h/80/2022/07/NYRH_gavel_Dodd.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>19:08</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The Supreme Court’s ruling in the Dobbs case was not a surprise; given the draft opinion that was leaked in May, its decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey was nearly a certainty. But the effects of the ruling have been rapid and chaotic. </span><span>In some states, abortions stopped overnight; in others, there’s profound confusion over what qualifies as a legally acceptable reason for having an abortion. </span><span>Far from settling the legal issue of abortion—by sending it back to the states—the Dobbs ruling opens an uncharted legal dimension where the health of a pregnant person is being pitted against the life of a fetus, with potentially fatal consequences. “Flat out, women will die in the course of ordinary pregnancy,” </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jia-tolentino"><span>Jia Tolentino</span></a><span> says, “because of physician fears about anything that might make them liable for felony changes of performing an abortion. It will make pregnancy significantly more dangerous for many, many people.” Tolentino and </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/stephania-taladrid"><span>Stephania Taladrid</span></a><span> have both reported extensively on abortion access, and they spoke this week with the </span><i><span>New Yorker </span></i><span>editor Tyler Foggatt. </span></p>
<p><i><span>A longer version of this conversation appears on The New Yorker’s </span></i><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/podcast/politics-and-more"><i><span>Politics and More</span></i></a><i><span> podcast.  </span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Jia Tolentino and Stephania Taladrid on the End of Roe v. Wade </itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The Supreme Court’s ruling in the Dobbs case was not a surprise; given the draft opinion that was leaked in May, its decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey was nearly a certainty. But the effects of the ruling have been rapid and chaotic. </span><span>In some states, abortions stopped overnight; in others, there’s profound confusion over what qualifies as a legally acceptable reason for having an abortion. </span><span>Far from settling the legal issue of abortion—by sending it back to the states—the Dobbs ruling opens an uncharted legal dimension where the health of a pregnant person is being pitted against the life of a fetus, with potentially fatal consequences. “Flat out, women will die in the course of ordinary pregnancy,” </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jia-tolentino"><span>Jia Tolentino</span></a><span> says, “because of physician fears about anything that might make them liable for felony changes of performing an abortion. It will make pregnancy significantly more dangerous for many, many people.” Tolentino and </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/stephania-taladrid"><span>Stephania Taladrid</span></a><span> have both reported extensively on abortion access, and they spoke this week with the </span><i><span>New Yorker </span></i><span>editor Tyler Foggatt. </span></p>
<p><i><span>A longer version of this conversation appears on The New Yorker’s </span></i><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/podcast/politics-and-more"><i><span>Politics and More</span></i></a><i><span> podcast.  </span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The Supreme Court’s ruling in the Dobbs case was not a surprise; given the draft opinion that was leaked in May, its decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey was nearly a certainty. But the effects of the ruling have been rapid and chaotic. In some states, abortions stopped overnight; in others, there’s profound confusion over what qualifies as a legally acceptable reason for having an abortion. Far from settling the legal issue of abortion—by sending it back to the states—the Dobbs ruling opens an uncharted legal dimension where the health of a pregnant person is being pitted against the life of a fetus, with potentially fatal consequences. “Flat out, women will die in the course of ordinary pregnancy,” Jia Tolentino says, “because of physician fears about anything that might make them liable for felony changes of performing an abortion. It will make pregnancy significantly more dangerous for many, many people.” Tolentino and Stephania Taladrid have both reported extensively on abortion access, and they spoke this week with the New Yorker editor Tyler Foggatt.  A longer version of this conversation appears on The New Yorker’s Politics and More podcast. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Why Do Conservatives Love Hungary’s Viktor Orbán?
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/why-do-conservatives-love-hungarys-viktor-orban-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;When the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;New Yorker &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/andrew-marantz"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Andrew Marantz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; first heard that the Conservative Political Action Conference, the flagship event of the American conservative movement, was holding a meeting in Hungary, he thought it might be a joke. “A lot of people have worried for a few years now that the Republican Party is becoming more ambivalent about certain bedrock norms of American democracy,” Marantz told David Remnick. “To openly state, ‘We’re going to this semi-authoritarian country’ . . .  I thought it was maybe a troll.” But C.P.A.C. Hungary was very real, and the event demonstrated an increasingly close relationship between American conservatives and authoritarians abroad. Viktor Orbán wins elections and claims a democratic mandate, but his legislative maneuvers and rewrites to the constitution have rendered political opposition increasingly powerless. Marantz finds the admiration for him by many in America unsettling. “I couldn’t really imagine a Putin-style takeover” of power in America, Marantz says; but “this kind of technical, legalistic Orbán model” seems all too plausible. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">90ecaaa4-9269-4638-989f-fd26a2b1d21e</guid><enclosure length="19888000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour062722_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1221896"/><category>authoritarianism</category><category>cpac</category><category>hungary</category><category>politics</category><category>viktor_orban</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour062722_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1221896"/><media:description type="plain">Why Do Conservatives Love Hungary’s Viktor Orbán?
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/06/NYRH_ViktorOrban.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>20:43</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>When the </span><i><span>New Yorker </span></i><span>staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/andrew-marantz"><span>Andrew Marantz</span></a><span> first heard that the Conservative Political Action Conference, the flagship event of the American conservative movement, was holding a meeting in Hungary, he thought it might be a joke. “A lot of people have worried for a few years now that the Republican Party is becoming more ambivalent about certain bedrock norms of American democracy,” Marantz told David Remnick. “To openly state, ‘We’re going to this semi-authoritarian country’ . . .  I thought it was maybe a troll.” But C.P.A.C. Hungary was very real, and the event demonstrated an increasingly close relationship between American conservatives and authoritarians abroad. Viktor Orbán wins elections and claims a democratic mandate, but his legislative maneuvers and rewrites to the constitution have rendered political opposition increasingly powerless. Marantz finds the admiration for him by many in America unsettling. “I couldn’t really imagine a Putin-style takeover” of power in America, Marantz says; but “this kind of technical, legalistic Orbán model” seems all too plausible. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Why Do Conservatives Love Hungary’s Viktor Orbán?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>When the </span><i><span>New Yorker </span></i><span>staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/andrew-marantz"><span>Andrew Marantz</span></a><span> first heard that the Conservative Political Action Conference, the flagship event of the American conservative movement, was holding a meeting in Hungary, he thought it might be a joke. “A lot of people have worried for a few years now that the Republican Party is becoming more ambivalent about certain bedrock norms of American democracy,” Marantz told David Remnick. “To openly state, ‘We’re going to this semi-authoritarian country’ . . .  I thought it was maybe a troll.” But C.P.A.C. Hungary was very real, and the event demonstrated an increasingly close relationship between American conservatives and authoritarians abroad. Viktor Orbán wins elections and claims a democratic mandate, but his legislative maneuvers and rewrites to the constitution have rendered political opposition increasingly powerless. Marantz finds the admiration for him by many in America unsettling. “I couldn’t really imagine a Putin-style takeover” of power in America, Marantz says; but “this kind of technical, legalistic Orbán model” seems all too plausible. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>When the New Yorker staff writer Andrew Marantz first heard that the Conservative Political Action Conference, the flagship event of the American conservative movement, was holding a meeting in Hungary, he thought it might be a joke. “A lot of people have worried for a few years now that the Republican Party is becoming more ambivalent about certain bedrock norms of American democracy,” Marantz told David Remnick. “To openly state, ‘We’re going to this semi-authoritarian country’ . . .  I thought it was maybe a troll.” But C.P.A.C. Hungary was very real, and the event demonstrated an increasingly close relationship between American conservatives and authoritarians abroad. Viktor Orbán wins elections and claims a democratic mandate, but his legislative maneuvers and rewrites to the constitution have rendered political opposition increasingly powerless. Marantz finds the admiration for him by many in America unsettling. “I couldn’t really imagine a Putin-style takeover” of power in America, Marantz says; but “this kind of technical, legalistic Orbán model” seems all too plausible.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Alan Alda, Podcaster
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/alan-alda-podcaster/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Alan Alda spent his early years in the burlesque theatres where his father, the actor Robert Alda, would perform. Those early years opened his eyes in more ways than one: “I was very aware of the naked women,” he told &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; Michael Schulman, “but I was also aware of the comics.” Watching from the wings, Alda grew an appreciation for being funny, being creative, and being present. He put those skills to use for eleven years on “M*A*S*H” and in dozens of other performances on stage and screen—recently, as a divorce lawyer for Adam Driver’s character in “Marriage Story.” But it was only later in life that Alda realized his skills might be useful in another arena: science. Alda made it his crusade to help scientists communicate their ideas to a broad audience. “What occurred to me,” Alda told Schulman, “was that if we trained scientists starting from actually improvising, they would be able to relate to the audience the way they were relating to me.” He hosted a series of science programs and founded the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science at Stony Brook University. He also started a podcast. On “Clear+Vivid with Alan Alda,” Alda interviews luminaries from the fields of science, politics, and entertainment, drawing on his training to make their specialist knowledge accessible to listeners. Interviewing, he thinks, isn’t unlike performing with a scene partner: “You have to relate to the other person,” says Alda. “You have to observe the other person. You have to be watching their face, their body and language” to determine what it is the guest “really means.” Plus, if you’re still looking for something for the kids to do this summer, have you considered Horse Camp? A comedy sketch by Emily Flake and Sarah Hutto.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">59e5ffed-d5d5-4276-9ec6-9503630fe4d8</guid><enclosure length="27792000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour062422_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1221897"/><category>alan_alda</category><category>camp</category><category>communication</category><category>horse</category><category>podcast</category><category>science</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour062422_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1221897"/><media:description type="plain">Alan Alda, Podcaster
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/06/NYRH_AlanAlda.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>28:57</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Alan Alda spent his early years in the burlesque theatres where his father, the actor Robert Alda, would perform. Those early years opened his eyes in more ways than one: “I was very aware of the naked women,” he told </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> Michael Schulman, “but I was also aware of the comics.” Watching from the wings, Alda grew an appreciation for being funny, being creative, and being present. He put those skills to use for eleven years on “M*A*S*H” and in dozens of other performances on stage and screen—recently, as a divorce lawyer for Adam Driver’s character in “Marriage Story.” But it was only later in life that Alda realized his skills might be useful in another arena: science. Alda made it his crusade to help scientists communicate their ideas to a broad audience. “What occurred to me,” Alda told Schulman, “was that if we trained scientists starting from actually improvising, they would be able to relate to the audience the way they were relating to me.” He hosted a series of science programs and founded the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science at Stony Brook University. He also started a podcast. On “Clear+Vivid with Alan Alda,” Alda interviews luminaries from the fields of science, politics, and entertainment, drawing on his training to make their specialist knowledge accessible to listeners. Interviewing, he thinks, isn’t unlike performing with a scene partner: “You have to relate to the other person,” says Alda. “You have to observe the other person. You have to be watching their face, their body and language” to determine what it is the guest “really means.” Plus, if you’re still looking for something for the kids to do this summer, have you considered Horse Camp? A comedy sketch by Emily Flake and Sarah Hutto.  </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Alan Alda, Podcaster</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Alan Alda spent his early years in the burlesque theatres where his father, the actor Robert Alda, would perform. Those early years opened his eyes in more ways than one: “I was very aware of the naked women,” he told </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> Michael Schulman, “but I was also aware of the comics.” Watching from the wings, Alda grew an appreciation for being funny, being creative, and being present. He put those skills to use for eleven years on “M*A*S*H” and in dozens of other performances on stage and screen—recently, as a divorce lawyer for Adam Driver’s character in “Marriage Story.” But it was only later in life that Alda realized his skills might be useful in another arena: science. Alda made it his crusade to help scientists communicate their ideas to a broad audience. “What occurred to me,” Alda told Schulman, “was that if we trained scientists starting from actually improvising, they would be able to relate to the audience the way they were relating to me.” He hosted a series of science programs and founded the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science at Stony Brook University. He also started a podcast. On “Clear+Vivid with Alan Alda,” Alda interviews luminaries from the fields of science, politics, and entertainment, drawing on his training to make their specialist knowledge accessible to listeners. Interviewing, he thinks, isn’t unlike performing with a scene partner: “You have to relate to the other person,” says Alda. “You have to observe the other person. You have to be watching their face, their body and language” to determine what it is the guest “really means.” Plus, if you’re still looking for something for the kids to do this summer, have you considered Horse Camp? A comedy sketch by Emily Flake and Sarah Hutto.  </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Alan Alda spent his early years in the burlesque theatres where his father, the actor Robert Alda, would perform. Those early years opened his eyes in more ways than one: “I was very aware of the naked women,” he told The New Yorker’s Michael Schulman, “but I was also aware of the comics.” Watching from the wings, Alda grew an appreciation for being funny, being creative, and being present. He put those skills to use for eleven years on “M*A*S*H” and in dozens of other performances on stage and screen—recently, as a divorce lawyer for Adam Driver’s character in “Marriage Story.” But it was only later in life that Alda realized his skills might be useful in another arena: science. Alda made it his crusade to help scientists communicate their ideas to a broad audience. “What occurred to me,” Alda told Schulman, “was that if we trained scientists starting from actually improvising, they would be able to relate to the audience the way they were relating to me.” He hosted a series of science programs and founded the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science at Stony Brook University. He also started a podcast. On “Clear+Vivid with Alan Alda,” Alda interviews luminaries from the fields of science, politics, and entertainment, drawing on his training to make their specialist knowledge accessible to listeners. Interviewing, he thinks, isn’t unlike performing with a scene partner: “You have to relate to the other person,” says Alda. “You have to observe the other person. You have to be watching their face, their body and language” to determine what it is the guest “really means.” Plus, if you’re still looking for something for the kids to do this summer, have you considered Horse Camp? A comedy sketch by Emily Flake and Sarah Hutto. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Forget Dating Apps—the “Marriage Pact” Goes for the Long Haul
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/forget-dating-apps-marriage-pact-goes-long-haul-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;A survey that started as a student project at Stanford University has become a popular dating and relationship tool on campuses across the country. Its goal is to delve deeper than the superficial information found on a typ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;ical dating-app profile, connecting people based on deeply held values rather than looks or sports teams.  Most apps, says Liam MacGregor, who created the Marriage Pact with a fellow-student, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;“were designed to solve really specific problems … if you want a short-term relationship. But because they’re the only tools out there, people have tried to use them to solve these other problems.”  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Marriage Pact “set out to solve this very specific problem at the beginning: If you need a backup plan for a 50-year-long relationship, who’s right for that?” Would you put an elderly relative in a nursing home? Do you keep people as friends because they might be useful to you &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;later? Would you keep a gun in the house? More than 250,000 students across more than 75 campuses have taken the survey. The Radio Hour’s producer KalaLea talked to students at Princeton University, where the survey was being conducted, to find out what it was all about. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, perched high above the ice at Madison Square Garden, the organist Ray Castoldi has conducted the soundtrack of Rangers games and more for thirty years.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 05:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3f95f07e-0af5-4018-86e6-a3d15366e0ac</guid><enclosure length="29008000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour062122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1219163"/><category>algorithm</category><category>dating</category><category>madison_square_garden</category><category>marriage</category><category>marriage pact</category><category>organist</category><category>relationship</category><category>sports</category><category>stanford</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour062122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1219163"/><media:description type="plain">Forget Dating Apps—the “Marriage Pact” Goes for the Long Haul
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/06/MarriagePact.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>30:13</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>A survey that started as a student project at Stanford University has become a popular dating and relationship tool on campuses across the country. Its goal is to delve deeper than the superficial information found on a typ</span><span>ical dating-app profile, connecting people based on deeply held values rather than looks or sports teams.  Most apps, says Liam MacGregor, who created the Marriage Pact with a fellow-student, </span><span>“were designed to solve really specific problems … if you want a short-term relationship. But because they’re the only tools out there, people have tried to use them to solve these other problems.”  </span><span>The Marriage Pact “set out to solve this very specific problem at the beginning: If you need a backup plan for a 50-year-long relationship, who’s right for that?” Would you put an elderly relative in a nursing home? Do you keep people as friends because they might be useful to you </span><span>later? Would you keep a gun in the house? More than 250,000 students across more than 75 campuses have taken the survey. The Radio Hour’s producer KalaLea talked to students at Princeton University, where the survey was being conducted, to find out what it was all about. </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, perched high above the ice at Madison Square Garden, the organist Ray Castoldi has conducted the soundtrack of Rangers games and more for thirty years.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Forget Dating Apps—the “Marriage Pact” Goes for the Long Haul</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>A survey that started as a student project at Stanford University has become a popular dating and relationship tool on campuses across the country. Its goal is to delve deeper than the superficial information found on a typ</span><span>ical dating-app profile, connecting people based on deeply held values rather than looks or sports teams.  Most apps, says Liam MacGregor, who created the Marriage Pact with a fellow-student, </span><span>“were designed to solve really specific problems … if you want a short-term relationship. But because they’re the only tools out there, people have tried to use them to solve these other problems.”  </span><span>The Marriage Pact “set out to solve this very specific problem at the beginning: If you need a backup plan for a 50-year-long relationship, who’s right for that?” Would you put an elderly relative in a nursing home? Do you keep people as friends because they might be useful to you </span><span>later? Would you keep a gun in the house? More than 250,000 students across more than 75 campuses have taken the survey. The Radio Hour’s producer KalaLea talked to students at Princeton University, where the survey was being conducted, to find out what it was all about. </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, perched high above the ice at Madison Square Garden, the organist Ray Castoldi has conducted the soundtrack of Rangers games and more for thirty years.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>A survey that started as a student project at Stanford University has become a popular dating and relationship tool on campuses across the country. Its goal is to delve deeper than the superficial information found on a typical dating-app profile, connecting people based on deeply held values rather than looks or sports teams.  Most apps, says Liam MacGregor, who created the Marriage Pact with a fellow-student, “were designed to solve really specific problems … if you want a short-term relationship. But because they’re the only tools out there, people have tried to use them to solve these other problems.”  The Marriage Pact “set out to solve this very specific problem at the beginning: If you need a backup plan for a 50-year-long relationship, who’s right for that?” Would you put an elderly relative in a nursing home? Do you keep people as friends because they might be useful to you later? Would you keep a gun in the house? More than 250,000 students across more than 75 campuses have taken the survey. The Radio Hour’s producer KalaLea talked to students at Princeton University, where the survey was being conducted, to find out what it was all about. Plus, perched high above the ice at Madison Square Garden, the organist Ray Castoldi has conducted the soundtrack of Rangers games and more for thirty years.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Dexter Filkins on the Rise of Ron DeSantis
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/dexter-filkins-rise-ron-desantis-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has shown himself uniquely skilled at attracting attention beyond the borders of his home state.  Just this month, DeSantis blocked state funds for the Tampa Bay Rays stadium after players voiced support for gun control in the wake of the mass shooting in Uvalde, Texas.  He’s also continuing a fight to punish the Disney Corporation for criticizing Florida’s so-called Don’t Say Gay law.  An Ivy League-educated anti-élitist firebrand, he is willing to pick a fight with anyone—reporters, health officials, teachers, Mickey Mouse—to grab a headline. DeSantis “practically radiates ambition,” the staff writer Dexter Filkins tells David Remnick. “He sounds like Trump, except that he speaks in complete sentences. … He’s very good at staking out a position and pounding the table and saying, I’m not giving in to the liberals in the Northeast.” Yet despite having been anointed by Donald Trump in his primary election, DeSantis has refused to “kiss the ring,” and many see DeSantis as a possible opponent to Trump in a 2024 Republican primary. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5d824a25-1241-477b-8316-73759cc9c1ed</guid><enclosure length="19248000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour061722b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1219160"/><category>covid</category><category>election</category><category>government</category><category>news</category><category>politicians</category><category>politics</category><category>reporting</category><category>ron_desantis</category><category>trump</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour061722b_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1219160"/><media:description type="plain">Dexter Filkins on the Rise of Ron DeSantis
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/06/TNYEP348final.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>20:03</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has shown himself uniquely skilled at attracting attention beyond the borders of his home state.  Just this month, DeSantis blocked state funds for the Tampa Bay Rays stadium after players voiced support for gun control in the wake of the mass shooting in Uvalde, Texas.  He’s also continuing a fight to punish the Disney Corporation for criticizing Florida’s so-called Don’t Say Gay law.  An Ivy League-educated anti-élitist firebrand, he is willing to pick a fight with anyone—reporters, health officials, teachers, Mickey Mouse—to grab a headline. DeSantis “practically radiates ambition,” the staff writer Dexter Filkins tells David Remnick. “He sounds like Trump, except that he speaks in complete sentences. … He’s very good at staking out a position and pounding the table and saying, I’m not giving in to the liberals in the Northeast.” Yet despite having been anointed by Donald Trump in his primary election, DeSantis has refused to “kiss the ring,” and many see DeSantis as a possible opponent to Trump in a 2024 Republican primary. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Dexter Filkins on the Rise of Ron DeSantis</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has shown himself uniquely skilled at attracting attention beyond the borders of his home state.  Just this month, DeSantis blocked state funds for the Tampa Bay Rays stadium after players voiced support for gun control in the wake of the mass shooting in Uvalde, Texas.  He’s also continuing a fight to punish the Disney Corporation for criticizing Florida’s so-called Don’t Say Gay law.  An Ivy League-educated anti-élitist firebrand, he is willing to pick a fight with anyone—reporters, health officials, teachers, Mickey Mouse—to grab a headline. DeSantis “practically radiates ambition,” the staff writer Dexter Filkins tells David Remnick. “He sounds like Trump, except that he speaks in complete sentences. … He’s very good at staking out a position and pounding the table and saying, I’m not giving in to the liberals in the Northeast.” Yet despite having been anointed by Donald Trump in his primary election, DeSantis has refused to “kiss the ring,” and many see DeSantis as a possible opponent to Trump in a 2024 Republican primary. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has shown himself uniquely skilled at attracting attention beyond the borders of his home state.  Just this month, DeSantis blocked state funds for the Tampa Bay Rays stadium after players voiced support for gun control in the wake of the mass shooting in Uvalde, Texas.  He’s also continuing a fight to punish the Disney Corporation for criticizing Florida’s so-called Don’t Say Gay law.  An Ivy League-educated anti-élitist firebrand, he is willing to pick a fight with anyone—reporters, health officials, teachers, Mickey Mouse—to grab a headline. DeSantis “practically radiates ambition,” the staff writer Dexter Filkins tells David Remnick. “He sounds like Trump, except that he speaks in complete sentences. … He’s very good at staking out a position and pounding the table and saying, I’m not giving in to the liberals in the Northeast.” Yet despite having been anointed by Donald Trump in his primary election, DeSantis has refused to “kiss the ring,” and many see DeSantis as a possible opponent to Trump in a 2024 Republican primary.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Michael R. Jackson on “A Strange Loop,” His Black, Queer Coming-of-Age Musical
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/michael-r-jackson-strange-loop-his-black-queer-coming-age-musical-tony/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Michael R. Jackson’s Tony and Pulitzer Prize-winning musical “A Strange Loop” features a Black queer writer named Usher, who works as an usher, struggling to write a musical about a Black queer writer. Jackson’s work tackles the terror of the blank page alongside the terrors of the dating scene, and it speaks in frank and heartbreaking terms about Usher’s attempt to navigate gay life among Black and white partners. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/hilton-als"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Hilton Als&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; talked with Jackson about how he found inspiration in his own experience seeking identity and community. “I started writing the original monologue—building a sort of life raft for myself—to understand myself,” Jackson said. “It wasn’t until I got to a place of understanding that in my life I was caught up in a loop of self-hatred, that I could see what Usher’s problem was, and therefore what the structure of the piece was that would lead him out of that and into a better place.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;“A Strange Loop” is playing now at the Lyceum Theatre, on Broadway. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">795186f1-6eda-4688-80af-b23d4bc07d31</guid><enclosure length="16624000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour061522_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1217864"/><category>broadway</category><category>music</category><category>musical theater [lc]</category><category>pulitzer prize [lc]</category><category>storytelling</category><category>theater [lc]</category><category>tony_award</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour061522_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1217864"/><media:description type="plain">Michael R. Jackson on “A Strange Loop,” His Black, Queer Coming-of-Age Musical
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2022/04/RadioHour_StrangeLoop.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>17:19</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Michael R. Jackson’s Tony and Pulitzer Prize-winning musical “A Strange Loop” features a Black queer writer named Usher, who works as an usher, struggling to write a musical about a Black queer writer. Jackson’s work tackles the terror of the blank page alongside the terrors of the dating scene, and it speaks in frank and heartbreaking terms about Usher’s attempt to navigate gay life among Black and white partners. </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/hilton-als"><span>Hilton Als</span></a><span> talked with Jackson about how he found inspiration in his own experience seeking identity and community. “I started writing the original monologue—building a sort of life raft for myself—to understand myself,” Jackson said. “It wasn’t until I got to a place of understanding that in my life I was caught up in a loop of self-hatred, that I could see what Usher’s problem was, and therefore what the structure of the piece was that would lead him out of that and into a better place.”</span></p>
<p><span>“A Strange Loop” is playing now at the Lyceum Theatre, on Broadway. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Michael R. Jackson on “A Strange Loop,” His Black, Queer Coming-of-Age Musical</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Michael R. Jackson’s Tony and Pulitzer Prize-winning musical “A Strange Loop” features a Black queer writer named Usher, who works as an usher, struggling to write a musical about a Black queer writer. Jackson’s work tackles the terror of the blank page alongside the terrors of the dating scene, and it speaks in frank and heartbreaking terms about Usher’s attempt to navigate gay life among Black and white partners. </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/hilton-als"><span>Hilton Als</span></a><span> talked with Jackson about how he found inspiration in his own experience seeking identity and community. “I started writing the original monologue—building a sort of life raft for myself—to understand myself,” Jackson said. “It wasn’t until I got to a place of understanding that in my life I was caught up in a loop of self-hatred, that I could see what Usher’s problem was, and therefore what the structure of the piece was that would lead him out of that and into a better place.”</span></p>
<p><span>“A Strange Loop” is playing now at the Lyceum Theatre, on Broadway. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Michael R. Jackson’s Tony and Pulitzer Prize-winning musical “A Strange Loop” features a Black queer writer named Usher, who works as an usher, struggling to write a musical about a Black queer writer. Jackson’s work tackles the terror of the blank page alongside the terrors of the dating scene, and it speaks in frank and heartbreaking terms about Usher’s attempt to navigate gay life among Black and white partners. Hilton Als talked with Jackson about how he found inspiration in his own experience seeking identity and community. “I started writing the original monologue—building a sort of life raft for myself—to understand myself,” Jackson said. “It wasn’t until I got to a place of understanding that in my life I was caught up in a loop of self-hatred, that I could see what Usher’s problem was, and therefore what the structure of the piece was that would lead him out of that and into a better place.”   “A Strange Loop” is playing now at the Lyceum Theatre, on Broadway.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Adrenaline Rush of Racing Drones
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/adrenaline-rush-racing-drones/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://newyorker.com/contributors/ian-frazier"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Ian Frazier&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, who has chronicled American life for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; for more than forty years, travelled to a house in Fort Collins, Colorado, where three roommates build, fly, and race drones. Jordan Temkin, Zachry Thayer, and Travis McIntyre were among the early professional drone racers in the sport, piloting the tiny devices through complex courses at upward of eighty miles an hour. Drones have had an enormous impact on military strategy, and the commercial applications seem limitless, but to these pilots drones exist in the strange overlap between pure adrenaline and big money that defines pro sports.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This piece originally aired on February 9, 2018.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42e18a04-be2e-40cc-b9ee-25e1456a6241</guid><enclosure length="15824000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour061422_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1216681"/><category>colorado</category><category>drones</category><category>extreme_sports</category><category>sports</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour061422_podcast_nomidroll.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1216681"/><media:description type="plain">The Adrenaline Rush of Racing Drones
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/1/drones-43crop-small.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>16:29</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://newyorker.com/contributors/ian-frazier"><span>Ian Frazier</span></a><span>, who has chronicled American life for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> for more than forty years, travelled to a house in Fort Collins, Colorado, where three roommates build, fly, and race drones. Jordan Temkin, Zachry Thayer, and Travis McIntyre were among the early professional drone racers in the sport, piloting the tiny devices through complex courses at upward of eighty miles an hour. Drones have had an enormous impact on military strategy, and the commercial applications seem limitless, but to these pilots drones exist in the strange overlap between pure adrenaline and big money that defines pro sports.</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><i><span>This piece originally aired on February 9, 2018.</span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Adrenaline Rush of Racing Drones</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://newyorker.com/contributors/ian-frazier"><span>Ian Frazier</span></a><span>, who has chronicled American life for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> for more than forty years, travelled to a house in Fort Collins, Colorado, where three roommates build, fly, and race drones. Jordan Temkin, Zachry Thayer, and Travis McIntyre were among the early professional drone racers in the sport, piloting the tiny devices through complex courses at upward of eighty miles an hour. Drones have had an enormous impact on military strategy, and the commercial applications seem limitless, but to these pilots drones exist in the strange overlap between pure adrenaline and big money that defines pro sports.</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><i><span>This piece originally aired on February 9, 2018.</span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Ian Frazier, who has chronicled American life for The New Yorker for more than forty years, travelled to a house in Fort Collins, Colorado, where three roommates build, fly, and race drones. Jordan Temkin, Zachry Thayer, and Travis McIntyre were among the early professional drone racers in the sport, piloting the tiny devices through complex courses at upward of eighty miles an hour. Drones have had an enormous impact on military strategy, and the commercial applications seem limitless, but to these pilots drones exist in the strange overlap between pure adrenaline and big money that defines pro sports.   This piece originally aired on February 9, 2018.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Regina Spektor on Her New Album, “Home, Before and After”
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/regina-spektor-her-new-album-home-and-after-podcast/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Twenty years ago, Regina Spektor was yet another aspiring musician in New York, lugging around a backpack full of self-produced CDs, and playing at little clubs in the East Village—anywhere that had a piano. But anonymity in Spektor’s case didn’t last long.  She toured with the Strokes in 2003, and once she had a record deal, her ambitions grew outside indie music.  She moved into a pop vein, writing anthems about love and heartbreak, loneliness and death, belief and doubt.  Her 2006 album “Begin to Hope” went gold.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;“Home, Before and After,” being released this month, is Spektor’s first new album in six years.  She sat down at a grand piano with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/amanda-petrusich"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Amanda Petrusich&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, who covers music for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;, playing songs from the record and talking about the role of imagination and playfulness in her songwriting and her vocals.  “I think that life pushes you—especially as an adult, and especially when you’re responsible for other little humans—to be present in this logistic[al] sort of way,” she says. “I try as much as possible to integrate fun, because I love fun. And I love beauty. And I love magic. … I will not have anybody take that away.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Spektor performed “Loveology,” “Becoming All Alone,” and the older “Aprѐs Moi,” accompanying herself on piano.  The podcast episode for this segment features a bonus track, “Spacetime Fairytale.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 12:09:45 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">78df313b-6620-462c-b392-7f947f788966</guid><enclosure length="41616000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour061022_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1216678"/><category>music</category><category>pop_music</category><category>russia</category><category>songwriting</category><category>ukraine</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour061022_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1216678"/><media:description type="plain">Regina Spektor on Her New Album, “Home, Before and After”
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/06/NYRH_ReginaSpektor.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>43:21</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Twenty years ago, Regina Spektor was yet another aspiring musician in New York, lugging around a backpack full of self-produced CDs, and playing at little clubs in the East Village—anywhere that had a piano. But anonymity in Spektor’s case didn’t last long.  She toured with the Strokes in 2003, and once she had a record deal, her ambitions grew outside indie music.  She moved into a pop vein, writing anthems about love and heartbreak, loneliness and death, belief and doubt.  Her 2006 album “Begin to Hope” went gold.  </span></p>
<p><span>“Home, Before and After,” being released this month, is Spektor’s first new album in six years.  She sat down at a grand piano with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/amanda-petrusich"><span>Amanda Petrusich</span></a><span>, who covers music for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span>, playing songs from the record and talking about the role of imagination and playfulness in her songwriting and her vocals.  “I think that life pushes you—especially as an adult, and especially when you’re responsible for other little humans—to be present in this logistic[al] sort of way,” she says. “I try as much as possible to integrate fun, because I love fun. And I love beauty. And I love magic. … I will not have anybody take that away.”</span></p>
<p><span>Spektor performed “Loveology,” “Becoming All Alone,” and the older “Aprѐs Moi,” accompanying herself on piano.  The podcast episode for this segment features a bonus track, “Spacetime Fairytale.” </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Regina Spektor on Her New Album, “Home, Before and After”</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Twenty years ago, Regina Spektor was yet another aspiring musician in New York, lugging around a backpack full of self-produced CDs, and playing at little clubs in the East Village—anywhere that had a piano. But anonymity in Spektor’s case didn’t last long.  She toured with the Strokes in 2003, and once she had a record deal, her ambitions grew outside indie music.  She moved into a pop vein, writing anthems about love and heartbreak, loneliness and death, belief and doubt.  Her 2006 album “Begin to Hope” went gold.  </span></p>
<p><span>“Home, Before and After,” being released this month, is Spektor’s first new album in six years.  She sat down at a grand piano with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/amanda-petrusich"><span>Amanda Petrusich</span></a><span>, who covers music for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span>, playing songs from the record and talking about the role of imagination and playfulness in her songwriting and her vocals.  “I think that life pushes you—especially as an adult, and especially when you’re responsible for other little humans—to be present in this logistic[al] sort of way,” she says. “I try as much as possible to integrate fun, because I love fun. And I love beauty. And I love magic. … I will not have anybody take that away.”</span></p>
<p><span>Spektor performed “Loveology,” “Becoming All Alone,” and the older “Aprѐs Moi,” accompanying herself on piano.  The podcast episode for this segment features a bonus track, “Spacetime Fairytale.” </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Twenty years ago, Regina Spektor was yet another aspiring musician in New York, lugging around a backpack full of self-produced CDs, and playing at little clubs in the East Village—anywhere that had a piano. But anonymity in Spektor’s case didn’t last long.  She toured with the Strokes in 2003, and once she had a record deal, her ambitions grew outside indie music.  She moved into a pop vein, writing anthems about love and heartbreak, loneliness and death, belief and doubt.  Her 2006 album “Begin to Hope” went gold.   “Home, Before and After,” being released this month, is Spektor’s first new album in six years.  She sat down at a grand piano with Amanda Petrusich, who covers music for The New Yorker, playing songs from the record and talking about the role of imagination and playfulness in her songwriting and her vocals.  “I think that life pushes you—especially as an adult, and especially when you’re responsible for other little humans—to be present in this logistic[al] sort of way,” she says. “I try as much as possible to integrate fun, because I love fun. And I love beauty. And I love magic. … I will not have anybody take that away.” Spektor performed “Loveology,” “Becoming All Alone,” and the older “Aprѐs Moi,” accompanying herself on piano.  The podcast episode for this segment features a bonus track, “Spacetime Fairytale.” </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Masha Gessen on the Quiet in Kyiv
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/masha-gessen-quiet-kyiv/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Masha Gessen is reporting for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; on the war in Ukraine, which is now in its fourth month. They checked in with David Remnick from Kyiv, which seems almost normal, with “hipsters in cafés” and people riding electric scooters. But the scooters, Gessen noted, are popular because prices have skyrocketed and gasoline is unaffordable. All the talk, meanwhile, is of war crimes—of murder, rape, torture, and kidnapping. (The Russian government has denied involvement in any war crimes.) And outside the city, in the suburbs, Gessen finds “unimaginable destruction,” comparable to what they saw in Grozny, Chechnya, “after the second war—after they’d had nearly ten years of carpet bombing.” The scale of atrocities, Gessen says, makes any diplomatic compromise over territory impossible for Ukrainians to accept. Plus, the head of the largest flight attendants’ union talks with the staff writer Jennifer Gonnerman about leading her members through turbulent times, with organized labor making a comeback, while unruly passenger behavior is reaching new heights.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 03:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">41b50578-2356-4fcb-bb65-a120f4818d32</guid><enclosure length="19824000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour060722_podcast_2.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1214140"/><category>breaking_news</category><category>national_news</category><category>sad</category><category>serious</category><category>ukraine_war</category><category>unions</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour060722_podcast_2.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1214140"/><media:description type="plain">Masha Gessen on the Quiet in Kyiv
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/06/AP22149613598567_K3i1rJA.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>20:39</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Masha Gessen is reporting for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> on the war in Ukraine, which is now in its fourth month. They checked in with David Remnick from Kyiv, which seems almost normal, with “hipsters in cafés” and people riding electric scooters. But the scooters, Gessen noted, are popular because prices have skyrocketed and gasoline is unaffordable. All the talk, meanwhile, is of war crimes—of murder, rape, torture, and kidnapping. (The Russian government has denied involvement in any war crimes.) And outside the city, in the suburbs, Gessen finds “unimaginable destruction,” comparable to what they saw in Grozny, Chechnya, “after the second war—after they’d had nearly ten years of carpet bombing.” The scale of atrocities, Gessen says, makes any diplomatic compromise over territory impossible for Ukrainians to accept. Plus, the head of the largest flight attendants’ union talks with the staff writer Jennifer Gonnerman about leading her members through turbulent times, with organized labor making a comeback, while unruly passenger behavior is reaching new heights.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Masha Gessen on the Quiet in Kyiv</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Masha Gessen is reporting for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> on the war in Ukraine, which is now in its fourth month. They checked in with David Remnick from Kyiv, which seems almost normal, with “hipsters in cafés” and people riding electric scooters. But the scooters, Gessen noted, are popular because prices have skyrocketed and gasoline is unaffordable. All the talk, meanwhile, is of war crimes—of murder, rape, torture, and kidnapping. (The Russian government has denied involvement in any war crimes.) And outside the city, in the suburbs, Gessen finds “unimaginable destruction,” comparable to what they saw in Grozny, Chechnya, “after the second war—after they’d had nearly ten years of carpet bombing.” The scale of atrocities, Gessen says, makes any diplomatic compromise over territory impossible for Ukrainians to accept. Plus, the head of the largest flight attendants’ union talks with the staff writer Jennifer Gonnerman about leading her members through turbulent times, with organized labor making a comeback, while unruly passenger behavior is reaching new heights.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Masha Gessen is reporting for The New Yorker on the war in Ukraine, which is now in its fourth month. They checked in with David Remnick from Kyiv, which seems almost normal, with “hipsters in cafés” and people riding electric scooters. But the scooters, Gessen noted, are popular because prices have skyrocketed and gasoline is unaffordable. All the talk, meanwhile, is of war crimes—of murder, rape, torture, and kidnapping. (The Russian government has denied involvement in any war crimes.) And outside the city, in the suburbs, Gessen finds “unimaginable destruction,” comparable to what they saw in Grozny, Chechnya, “after the second war—after they’d had nearly ten years of carpet bombing.” The scale of atrocities, Gessen says, makes any diplomatic compromise over territory impossible for Ukrainians to accept. Plus, the head of the largest flight attendants’ union talks with the staff writer Jennifer Gonnerman about leading her members through turbulent times, with organized labor making a comeback, while unruly passenger behavior is reaching new heights.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>“The Book of Queer,” and “Bob’s Burgers” Hits the Big Screen
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/book-queer-and-bobs-burgers-hits-big-screen/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;While working on his Ph.D., the historian Eric Cervini (whose book “The Deviant’s War” was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize) noticed the lack of popular histories on L.G.B.T.Q. issues. Researchers were publishing plenty of papers, but they were mostly in peer-reviewed journals and other academic outlets. His attempts to change that—first with his Instagram videos, and now with a series on Discovery+—bring to life key moments and figures in queer history, including the pharaoh Akhenaten and President Abraham Lincoln. “I would describe [the show] as a queer-history variety show,” Cervini told &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Michael Schulman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. “The Book of Queer” is streaming on Discovery+, with new episodes each week in June. Plus,Loren Bouchard, the creator of “Bob’s Burgers,” resisted making a movie from his TV show—until now. He talked with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; Sarah Larson about the show’s surprising strain of optimism.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2604bb6b-81fc-43ce-9c7e-6a716e65dd16</guid><enclosure length="28544000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour060322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1214132"/><category>arts</category><category>bobs_burgers</category><category>funny</category><category>interview</category><category>lgbtq</category><category>movies</category><category>queer</category><category>sweet</category><category>weird</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour060322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1214132"/><media:description type="plain">“The Book of Queer,” and “Bob’s Burgers” Hits the Big Screen
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/06/EP346FinalArt.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>29:44</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>While working on his Ph.D., the historian Eric Cervini (whose book “The Deviant’s War” was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize) noticed the lack of popular histories on L.G.B.T.Q. issues. Researchers were publishing plenty of papers, but they were mostly in peer-reviewed journals and other academic outlets. His attempts to change that—first with his Instagram videos, and now with a series on Discovery+—bring to life key moments and figures in queer history, including the pharaoh Akhenaten and President Abraham Lincoln. “I would describe [the show] as a queer-history variety show,” Cervini told </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"><span>Michael Schulman</span></a><span>. “The Book of Queer” is streaming on Discovery+, with new episodes each week in June. Plus,Loren Bouchard, the creator of “Bob’s Burgers,” resisted making a movie from his TV show—until now. He talked with </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> Sarah Larson about the show’s surprising strain of optimism.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>“The Book of Queer,” and “Bob’s Burgers” Hits the Big Screen</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>While working on his Ph.D., the historian Eric Cervini (whose book “The Deviant’s War” was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize) noticed the lack of popular histories on L.G.B.T.Q. issues. Researchers were publishing plenty of papers, but they were mostly in peer-reviewed journals and other academic outlets. His attempts to change that—first with his Instagram videos, and now with a series on Discovery+—bring to life key moments and figures in queer history, including the pharaoh Akhenaten and President Abraham Lincoln. “I would describe [the show] as a queer-history variety show,” Cervini told </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"><span>Michael Schulman</span></a><span>. “The Book of Queer” is streaming on Discovery+, with new episodes each week in June. Plus,Loren Bouchard, the creator of “Bob’s Burgers,” resisted making a movie from his TV show—until now. He talked with </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> Sarah Larson about the show’s surprising strain of optimism.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>While working on his Ph.D., the historian Eric Cervini (whose book “The Deviant’s War” was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize) noticed the lack of popular histories on L.G.B.T.Q. issues. Researchers were publishing plenty of papers, but they were mostly in peer-reviewed journals and other academic outlets. His attempts to change that—first with his Instagram videos, and now with a series on Discovery+—bring to life key moments and figures in queer history, including the pharaoh Akhenaten and President Abraham Lincoln. “I would describe [the show] as a queer-history variety show,” Cervini told Michael Schulman. “The Book of Queer” is streaming on Discovery+, with new episodes each week in June. Plus,Loren Bouchard, the creator of “Bob’s Burgers,” resisted making a movie from his TV show—until now. He talked with The New Yorker’s Sarah Larson about the show’s surprising strain of optimism.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Remembering Roger Angell, and Fishing with Karen Chee
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/remembering-roger-angell-and-fishing-karen-chee/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Roger Angell, who died last week, at the age of 101, was inducted in 2014 into the Baseball Hall of Fame in recognition of his extraordinary accomplishment as a baseball writer. But in a career at &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; that goes back to the Second World War, he wrote on practically every subject under the sun; he also served as fiction editor, taking the post once held by his mother, Katharine White.  Angell “did as much to distinguish &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; as anyone in the magazine’s nearly century-long history,” David Remnick wrote &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/postscript/remembering-roger-angell-hall-of-famer"&gt;&lt;span&gt;in a remembrance&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; last week. “His prose and his editorial judgment left an imprint that’s hard to overstate.”  In 2015, Remnick sat down for a long interview with Angell about his career, and particularly his masterful late essays—collected in “This Old Man: All in Pieces”—on aging, loss, and finding new love. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, we join the comedian—a writer for “Late Night with Seth Meyers” and “Pachinko,” and a &lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; contributor—on her favorite kind of outing: a fishing trip that doesn’t yield any fish.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ccc4219e-367a-4584-8b8f-8173a53e7699</guid><enclosure length="22864000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour053122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1212372"/><category>aging</category><category>baseball</category><category>books</category><category>comedy</category><category>fishing</category><category>interview</category><category>life</category><category>sports</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour053122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1212372"/><media:description type="plain">Remembering Roger Angell, and Fishing with Karen Chee
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/05/RAngell.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>23:49</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Roger Angell, who died last week, at the age of 101, was inducted in 2014 into the Baseball Hall of Fame in recognition of his extraordinary accomplishment as a baseball writer. But in a career at </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> that goes back to the Second World War, he wrote on practically every subject under the sun; he also served as fiction editor, taking the post once held by his mother, Katharine White.  Angell “did as much to distinguish </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> as anyone in the magazine’s nearly century-long history,” David Remnick wrote </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/postscript/remembering-roger-angell-hall-of-famer"><span>in a remembrance</span></a><span> last week. “His prose and his editorial judgment left an imprint that’s hard to overstate.”  In 2015, Remnick sat down for a long interview with Angell about his career, and particularly his masterful late essays—collected in “This Old Man: All in Pieces”—on aging, loss, and finding new love. </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, we join the comedian—a writer for “Late Night with Seth Meyers” and “Pachinko,” and a <i><span>New Yorker</span></i><span> contributor—on her favorite kind of outing: a fishing trip that doesn’t yield any fish.</span></span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Remembering Roger Angell, and Fishing with Karen Chee</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Roger Angell, who died last week, at the age of 101, was inducted in 2014 into the Baseball Hall of Fame in recognition of his extraordinary accomplishment as a baseball writer. But in a career at </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> that goes back to the Second World War, he wrote on practically every subject under the sun; he also served as fiction editor, taking the post once held by his mother, Katharine White.  Angell “did as much to distinguish </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> as anyone in the magazine’s nearly century-long history,” David Remnick wrote </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/postscript/remembering-roger-angell-hall-of-famer"><span>in a remembrance</span></a><span> last week. “His prose and his editorial judgment left an imprint that’s hard to overstate.”  In 2015, Remnick sat down for a long interview with Angell about his career, and particularly his masterful late essays—collected in “This Old Man: All in Pieces”—on aging, loss, and finding new love. </span></p>
<p><span>Plus, we join the comedian—a writer for “Late Night with Seth Meyers” and “Pachinko,” and a <i><span>New Yorker</span></i><span> contributor—on her favorite kind of outing: a fishing trip that doesn’t yield any fish.</span></span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Roger Angell, who died last week, at the age of 101, was inducted in 2014 into the Baseball Hall of Fame in recognition of his extraordinary accomplishment as a baseball writer. But in a career at The New Yorker that goes back to the Second World War, he wrote on practically every subject under the sun; he also served as fiction editor, taking the post once held by his mother, Katharine White.  Angell “did as much to distinguish The New Yorker as anyone in the magazine’s nearly century-long history,” David Remnick wrote in a remembrance last week. “His prose and his editorial judgment left an imprint that’s hard to overstate.”  In 2015, Remnick sat down for a long interview with Angell about his career, and particularly his masterful late essays—collected in “This Old Man: All in Pieces”—on aging, loss, and finding new love. Plus, we join the comedian—a writer for “Late Night with Seth Meyers” and “Pachinko,” and a New Yorker contributor—on her favorite kind of outing: a fishing trip that doesn’t yield any fish.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>What Makes a Mass Shooter? 
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/what-makes-mass-shooter-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In America, unthinkable violence has become routine.  In the wake of the Buffalo and Uvalde mass shootings, David Remnick speaks with the researchers Jillian Peterson and James Densley, whose book “The Violence Project” is the most in-depth study of mass shooters. Pro-gun politicians may continue to block any measures to reduce violence, but we can understand better a different side of the equation: what motivates these crimes. David Remnick speaks with two criminal-justice researchers who have studied mass killers, James Densley, of Metropolitan State University, and Jillian Peterson, of Hamline University. They point out that mass shootings have risen alongside deaths of despair, including overdoses and suicide.  “The perpetrator goes in with no escape plan,” Peterson points out.  “What we can learn from suicide prevention can teach us how to prevent some of these mass shootings.  We haven’t connected these two things.”  Remnick is also joined by &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/keeanga-yamahtta-taylor"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, who wrote about the Buffalo attack for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;; and we hear from a 70-year-old resident of Uvalde, Texas, about the aftermath of the killings in a tight-knit community. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd2e4059-6fe9-44fa-8b8b-2f94580fb98f</guid><enclosure length="25712000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour052722_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1212370"/><category>breaking_news</category><category>emotional</category><category>first-person_story</category><category>health</category><category>interview</category><category>news_analysis</category><category>racism</category><category>sad</category><category>serious</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour052722_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1212370"/><media:description type="plain">What Makes a Mass Shooter? 
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2022/05/EP345artfinal.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>26:47</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>In America, unthinkable violence has become routine.  In the wake of the Buffalo and Uvalde mass shootings, David Remnick speaks with the researchers Jillian Peterson and James Densley, whose book “The Violence Project” is the most in-depth study of mass shooters. Pro-gun politicians may continue to block any measures to reduce violence, but we can understand better a different side of the equation: what motivates these crimes. David Remnick speaks with two criminal-justice researchers who have studied mass killers, James Densley, of Metropolitan State University, and Jillian Peterson, of Hamline University. They point out that mass shootings have risen alongside deaths of despair, including overdoses and suicide.  “The perpetrator goes in with no escape plan,” Peterson points out.  “What we can learn from suicide prevention can teach us how to prevent some of these mass shootings.  We haven’t connected these two things.”  Remnick is also joined by </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/keeanga-yamahtta-taylor"><span>Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor</span></a><span>, who wrote about the Buffalo attack for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span>; and we hear from a 70-year-old resident of Uvalde, Texas, about the aftermath of the killings in a tight-knit community. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>What Makes a Mass Shooter?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>In America, unthinkable violence has become routine.  In the wake of the Buffalo and Uvalde mass shootings, David Remnick speaks with the researchers Jillian Peterson and James Densley, whose book “The Violence Project” is the most in-depth study of mass shooters. Pro-gun politicians may continue to block any measures to reduce violence, but we can understand better a different side of the equation: what motivates these crimes. David Remnick speaks with two criminal-justice researchers who have studied mass killers, James Densley, of Metropolitan State University, and Jillian Peterson, of Hamline University. They point out that mass shootings have risen alongside deaths of despair, including overdoses and suicide.  “The perpetrator goes in with no escape plan,” Peterson points out.  “What we can learn from suicide prevention can teach us how to prevent some of these mass shootings.  We haven’t connected these two things.”  Remnick is also joined by </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/keeanga-yamahtta-taylor"><span>Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor</span></a><span>, who wrote about the Buffalo attack for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span>; and we hear from a 70-year-old resident of Uvalde, Texas, about the aftermath of the killings in a tight-knit community. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>In America, unthinkable violence has become routine.  In the wake of the Buffalo and Uvalde mass shootings, David Remnick speaks with the researchers Jillian Peterson and James Densley, whose book “The Violence Project” is the most in-depth study of mass shooters. Pro-gun politicians may continue to block any measures to reduce violence, but we can understand better a different side of the equation: what motivates these crimes. David Remnick speaks with two criminal-justice researchers who have studied mass killers, James Densley, of Metropolitan State University, and Jillian Peterson, of Hamline University. They point out that mass shootings have risen alongside deaths of despair, including overdoses and suicide.  “The perpetrator goes in with no escape plan,” Peterson points out.  “What we can learn from suicide prevention can teach us how to prevent some of these mass shootings.  We haven’t connected these two things.”  Remnick is also joined by Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, who wrote about the Buffalo attack for The New Yorker; and we hear from a 70-year-old resident of Uvalde, Texas, about the aftermath of the killings in a tight-knit community.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Florence and the Machine, Live at The New Yorker Festival
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/florence-and-machine-live-new-yorker-festival-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Across five studio albums, Florence and the Machine has explored genres from pop to punk and soul; the band’s most recent record, “Dance Fever,” just came out. Florence Welch, the group’s singer and main songwriter, is by turns introspective and theatrical, poetic and confessional. She sat down with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/john-seabrook"&gt;&lt;span&gt;John Seabrook &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;at The New Yorker Festival in 2019 to reflect on her band’s rapid rise to stardom. She also spoke about her turn toward sobriety after years of heavy drinking. “The first year that I stopped, I felt like I’d really lost a big part of who I was and how I understood myself,” she says. “What I understood is that that was rock and roll, and, if you couldn’t go the hardest, you were letting rock and roll down.” But eventually getting sober let her connect more deeply with fans and with the music. “To be conscious and to be present and to really feel what’s going on—even though it’s painful, it feels like much more a truly reborn spirit of rock and roll,” she says.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a2138093-aded-4f35-bf12-ea72a0cd8c6f</guid><enclosure length="20624000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour052422_florencepodcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1210139"/><category>arts</category><category>concert</category><category>funny</category><category>in-studio_performance</category><category>interview</category><category>music</category><category>sweet</category><category>weird</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour052422_florencepodcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1210139"/><media:description type="plain">Florence and the Machine, Live at The New Yorker Festival
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/05/FATM.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>21:29</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Across five studio albums, Florence and the Machine has explored genres from pop to punk and soul; the band’s most recent record, “Dance Fever,” just came out. Florence Welch, the group’s singer and main songwriter, is by turns introspective and theatrical, poetic and confessional. She sat down with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/john-seabrook"><span>John Seabrook </span></a><span>at The New Yorker Festival in 2019 to reflect on her band’s rapid rise to stardom. She also spoke about her turn toward sobriety after years of heavy drinking. “The first year that I stopped, I felt like I’d really lost a big part of who I was and how I understood myself,” she says. “What I understood is that that was rock and roll, and, if you couldn’t go the hardest, you were letting rock and roll down.” But eventually getting sober let her connect more deeply with fans and with the music. “To be conscious and to be present and to really feel what’s going on—even though it’s painful, it feels like much more a truly reborn spirit of rock and roll,” she says.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Florence and the Machine, Live at The New Yorker Festival</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Across five studio albums, Florence and the Machine has explored genres from pop to punk and soul; the band’s most recent record, “Dance Fever,” just came out. Florence Welch, the group’s singer and main songwriter, is by turns introspective and theatrical, poetic and confessional. She sat down with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/john-seabrook"><span>John Seabrook </span></a><span>at The New Yorker Festival in 2019 to reflect on her band’s rapid rise to stardom. She also spoke about her turn toward sobriety after years of heavy drinking. “The first year that I stopped, I felt like I’d really lost a big part of who I was and how I understood myself,” she says. “What I understood is that that was rock and roll, and, if you couldn’t go the hardest, you were letting rock and roll down.” But eventually getting sober let her connect more deeply with fans and with the music. “To be conscious and to be present and to really feel what’s going on—even though it’s painful, it feels like much more a truly reborn spirit of rock and roll,” she says.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Across five studio albums, Florence and the Machine has explored genres from pop to punk and soul; the band’s most recent record, “Dance Fever,” just came out. Florence Welch, the group’s singer and main songwriter, is by turns introspective and theatrical, poetic and confessional. She sat down with John Seabrook at The New Yorker Festival in 2019 to reflect on her band’s rapid rise to stardom. She also spoke about her turn toward sobriety after years of heavy drinking. “The first year that I stopped, I felt like I’d really lost a big part of who I was and how I understood myself,” she says. “What I understood is that that was rock and roll, and, if you couldn’t go the hardest, you were letting rock and roll down.” But eventually getting sober let her connect more deeply with fans and with the music. “To be conscious and to be present and to really feel what’s going on—even though it’s painful, it feels like much more a truly reborn spirit of rock and roll,” she says.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Attack on Gender-Affirming Medical Care
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/attack-gender-affirming-medical-care-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Across the United States, conservative politicians are leading a backlash against L.G.B.T.Q. identity, framing legal restrictions as protection of children. Several states have introduced laws to ban medical treatments known as gender-affirming care—including hormones and puberty blockers—prescribed to adolescents. Major medical organizations have approved the treatments, but &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/rachel-monroe"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Rachel Monroe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, who has been following efforts to ban gender-affirming care in Texas, found that doctors wouldn’t speak out about the political furor because the resulting attention could endanger themselves, their clinics, and their patients. One specialist, however, was willing to go on the record: Dr. Gina Sequeira, a co-director of the Gender Clinic at Seattle Children’s. “I was growing so frustrated seeing the narrative around gender-affirming care provision for youth so full of misinformation and so full of blatant falsehoods that I couldn't in good conscience continue to stay quiet,” Sequeira told her. Doctors cite a body of data that gender-affirming care reduces the risk of suicide, which is high among trans youth. Sequeira’s Seattle clinic has been fielding calls from Texas families looking to relocate if the proposed ban in Texas prevents their children from accessing care. “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;If we were to stop care, I would be afraid that our child wouldn’t survive,” the mother of a trans girl told Monroe. “There’s no question that she’s not safe to herself.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">67bbaa23-6de7-40ae-8a12-0584653df69a</guid><enclosure length="27952000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour052022_transkidspodcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1210132"/><category>edifying</category><category>emotional</category><category>first-person_story</category><category>health</category><category>interview</category><category>national_news</category><category>news_analysis</category><category>sad</category><category>serious</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour052022_transkidspodcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1210132"/><media:description type="plain">The Attack on Gender-Affirming Medical Care
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2022/05/EP_344_art_tfkwLDB.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>29:07</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Across the United States, conservative politicians are leading a backlash against L.G.B.T.Q. identity, framing legal restrictions as protection of children. Several states have introduced laws to ban medical treatments known as gender-affirming care—including hormones and puberty blockers—prescribed to adolescents. Major medical organizations have approved the treatments, but </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/rachel-monroe"><span>Rachel Monroe</span></a><span>, who has been following efforts to ban gender-affirming care in Texas, found that doctors wouldn’t speak out about the political furor because the resulting attention could endanger themselves, their clinics, and their patients. One specialist, however, was willing to go on the record: Dr. Gina Sequeira, a co-director of the Gender Clinic at Seattle Children’s. “I was growing so frustrated seeing the narrative around gender-affirming care provision for youth so full of misinformation and so full of blatant falsehoods that I couldn't in good conscience continue to stay quiet,” Sequeira told her. Doctors cite a body of data that gender-affirming care reduces the risk of suicide, which is high among trans youth. Sequeira’s Seattle clinic has been fielding calls from Texas families looking to relocate if the proposed ban in Texas prevents their children from accessing care. “</span><span>If we were to stop care, I would be afraid that our child wouldn’t survive,” the mother of a trans girl told Monroe. “There’s no question that she’s not safe to herself.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Attack on Gender-Affirming Medical Care</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Across the United States, conservative politicians are leading a backlash against L.G.B.T.Q. identity, framing legal restrictions as protection of children. Several states have introduced laws to ban medical treatments known as gender-affirming care—including hormones and puberty blockers—prescribed to adolescents. Major medical organizations have approved the treatments, but </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/rachel-monroe"><span>Rachel Monroe</span></a><span>, who has been following efforts to ban gender-affirming care in Texas, found that doctors wouldn’t speak out about the political furor because the resulting attention could endanger themselves, their clinics, and their patients. One specialist, however, was willing to go on the record: Dr. Gina Sequeira, a co-director of the Gender Clinic at Seattle Children’s. “I was growing so frustrated seeing the narrative around gender-affirming care provision for youth so full of misinformation and so full of blatant falsehoods that I couldn't in good conscience continue to stay quiet,” Sequeira told her. Doctors cite a body of data that gender-affirming care reduces the risk of suicide, which is high among trans youth. Sequeira’s Seattle clinic has been fielding calls from Texas families looking to relocate if the proposed ban in Texas prevents their children from accessing care. “</span><span>If we were to stop care, I would be afraid that our child wouldn’t survive,” the mother of a trans girl told Monroe. “There’s no question that she’s not safe to herself.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Across the United States, conservative politicians are leading a backlash against L.G.B.T.Q. identity, framing legal restrictions as protection of children. Several states have introduced laws to ban medical treatments known as gender-affirming care—including hormones and puberty blockers—prescribed to adolescents. Major medical organizations have approved the treatments, but Rachel Monroe, who has been following efforts to ban gender-affirming care in Texas, found that doctors wouldn’t speak out about the political furor because the resulting attention could endanger themselves, their clinics, and their patients. One specialist, however, was willing to go on the record: Dr. Gina Sequeira, a co-director of the Gender Clinic at Seattle Children’s. “I was growing so frustrated seeing the narrative around gender-affirming care provision for youth so full of misinformation and so full of blatant falsehoods that I couldn't in good conscience continue to stay quiet,” Sequeira told her. Doctors cite a body of data that gender-affirming care reduces the risk of suicide, which is high among trans youth. Sequeira’s Seattle clinic has been fielding calls from Texas families looking to relocate if the proposed ban in Texas prevents their children from accessing care. “If we were to stop care, I would be afraid that our child wouldn’t survive,” the mother of a trans girl told Monroe. “There’s no question that she’s not safe to herself.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Comedian Megan Stalter on Finding Inspiration in American Absurdity
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/comedian-megan-stalter-finding-inspiration-american-absurdity/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Before the pandemic, Megan Stalter was an unknown comedian, trying to catch a lucky break at clubs in New York City. But with the arrival of COVID-19, social media became her only outlet, and she quickly found an audience with her short-form, D.I.Y. character videos,  portraying the “breadth of American idiocy,” as &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Michael Schulman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; puts it, with such accuracy and heart that it’s hard to turn away. After her rise to Internet fame—she was dubbed the “queen of quarantine”—Stalter was offered the part of Kayla, the overprivileged and clueless assistant, on HBO’s hit series “Hacks.”  It was her first acting job.  Plus, Helen Rosner joins the chef Andy Baraghani in his home kitchen for a lesson on cauliflower ragu. Baraghani, best known for his YouTube cooking videos for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Bon Appetit&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;, is out with a new cookbook called “The Cook You Want to Be.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 03:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">12c18347-cff4-46b0-ad40-8abbabe857e4</guid><enclosure length="27168000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour051722_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1207963"/><category>comedy</category><category>hacks</category><category>internet</category><category>lgbtq</category><category>meg stalter</category><category>social_media</category><category>television</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour051722_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1207963"/><media:description type="plain">The Comedian Megan Stalter on Finding Inspiration in American Absurdity
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/05/megstalteralexavisicus.JPG" width="130"/><itunes:duration>28:18</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Before the pandemic, Megan Stalter was an unknown comedian, trying to catch a lucky break at clubs in New York City. But with the arrival of COVID-19, social media became her only outlet, and she quickly found an audience with her short-form, D.I.Y. character videos,  portraying the “breadth of American idiocy,” as </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"><span>Michael Schulman</span></a><span> puts it, with such accuracy and heart that it’s hard to turn away. After her rise to Internet fame—she was dubbed the “queen of quarantine”—Stalter was offered the part of Kayla, the overprivileged and clueless assistant, on HBO’s hit series “Hacks.”  It was her first acting job.  Plus, Helen Rosner joins the chef Andy Baraghani in his home kitchen for a lesson on cauliflower ragu. Baraghani, best known for his YouTube cooking videos for </span><i><span>Bon Appetit</span></i><span>, is out with a new cookbook called “The Cook You Want to Be.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Comedian Megan Stalter on Finding Inspiration in American Absurdity</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Before the pandemic, Megan Stalter was an unknown comedian, trying to catch a lucky break at clubs in New York City. But with the arrival of COVID-19, social media became her only outlet, and she quickly found an audience with her short-form, D.I.Y. character videos,  portraying the “breadth of American idiocy,” as </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"><span>Michael Schulman</span></a><span> puts it, with such accuracy and heart that it’s hard to turn away. After her rise to Internet fame—she was dubbed the “queen of quarantine”—Stalter was offered the part of Kayla, the overprivileged and clueless assistant, on HBO’s hit series “Hacks.”  It was her first acting job.  Plus, Helen Rosner joins the chef Andy Baraghani in his home kitchen for a lesson on cauliflower ragu. Baraghani, best known for his YouTube cooking videos for </span><i><span>Bon Appetit</span></i><span>, is out with a new cookbook called “The Cook You Want to Be.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Before the pandemic, Megan Stalter was an unknown comedian, trying to catch a lucky break at clubs in New York City. But with the arrival of COVID-19, social media became her only outlet, and she quickly found an audience with her short-form, D.I.Y. character videos,  portraying the “breadth of American idiocy,” as Michael Schulman puts it, with such accuracy and heart that it’s hard to turn away. After her rise to Internet fame—she was dubbed the “queen of quarantine”—Stalter was offered the part of Kayla, the overprivileged and clueless assistant, on HBO’s hit series “Hacks.”  It was her first acting job.  Plus, Helen Rosner joins the chef Andy Baraghani in his home kitchen for a lesson on cauliflower ragu. Baraghani, best known for his YouTube cooking videos for Bon Appetit, is out with a new cookbook called “The Cook You Want to Be.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Battle After Roe v. Wade
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/battle-after-roe-v-wade-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Assuming that Justice Samuel Alito’s final opinion in the Mississippi abortion case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization gets majority support, there will be profound social, political, and health-care implications across the United States.   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/margaret-talbot"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Margaret Talbot&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/peter-slevin"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Peter Slevin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jia-tolentino"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jia Tolentino&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; assess the world after Roe.  Opponents will surely not stop by leaving abortion at the state level but will try to ban it under federal law.  Tolentino discusses fetal personhood, the legal concept that a fertilized egg is entitled to full legal rights, which severely compromises the bodily autonomy of a pregnant woman.  There is already speculation that access to birth control and same-sex marriage could be challenged. “If people feel panicked about all those things, I wouldn’t invalidate that,” Tolentino says. But focussing on the immediate post-Roe future, she says, presents enough to worry about. “This is a universe of panic on its own. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21960396-c9ab-4dcc-9800-86ce688a4357</guid><enclosure length="20016000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour051322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1207624"/><category>abortion</category><category>abortion_laws</category><category>jia_tolentino</category><category>margaret_talbot</category><category>news</category><category>reproductive rights [lc]</category><category>suprem_court</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour051322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1207624"/><media:description type="plain">The Battle After Roe v. Wade
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/05/TNY-EP-343-Art.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>20:51</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Assuming that Justice Samuel Alito’s final opinion in the Mississippi abortion case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization gets majority support, there will be profound social, political, and health-care implications across the United States.   </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/margaret-talbot"><span>Margaret Talbot</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/peter-slevin"><span>Peter Slevin</span></a><span> and </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jia-tolentino"><span>Jia Tolentino</span></a><span> assess the world after Roe.  Opponents will surely not stop by leaving abortion at the state level but will try to ban it under federal law.  Tolentino discusses fetal personhood, the legal concept that a fertilized egg is entitled to full legal rights, which severely compromises the bodily autonomy of a pregnant woman.  There is already speculation that access to birth control and same-sex marriage could be challenged. “If people feel panicked about all those things, I wouldn’t invalidate that,” Tolentino says. But focussing on the immediate post-Roe future, she says, presents enough to worry about. “This is a universe of panic on its own.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Battle After Roe v. Wade</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Assuming that Justice Samuel Alito’s final opinion in the Mississippi abortion case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization gets majority support, there will be profound social, political, and health-care implications across the United States.   </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/margaret-talbot"><span>Margaret Talbot</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/peter-slevin"><span>Peter Slevin</span></a><span> and </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jia-tolentino"><span>Jia Tolentino</span></a><span> assess the world after Roe.  Opponents will surely not stop by leaving abortion at the state level but will try to ban it under federal law.  Tolentino discusses fetal personhood, the legal concept that a fertilized egg is entitled to full legal rights, which severely compromises the bodily autonomy of a pregnant woman.  There is already speculation that access to birth control and same-sex marriage could be challenged. “If people feel panicked about all those things, I wouldn’t invalidate that,” Tolentino says. But focussing on the immediate post-Roe future, she says, presents enough to worry about. “This is a universe of panic on its own.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Assuming that Justice Samuel Alito’s final opinion in the Mississippi abortion case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization gets majority support, there will be profound social, political, and health-care implications across the United States.   Margaret Talbot, Peter Slevin and Jia Tolentino assess the world after Roe.  Opponents will surely not stop by leaving abortion at the state level but will try to ban it under federal law.  Tolentino discusses fetal personhood, the legal concept that a fertilized egg is entitled to full legal rights, which severely compromises the bodily autonomy of a pregnant woman.  There is already speculation that access to birth control and same-sex marriage could be challenged. “If people feel panicked about all those things, I wouldn’t invalidate that,” Tolentino says. But focussing on the immediate post-Roe future, she says, presents enough to worry about. “This is a universe of panic on its own.   </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Stephanie Hsu on “Everything Everywhere All at Once”
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/stephanie-hsu-everything-everywhere-all-once-pod2/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;“Everything Everywhere All At Once”&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;is in a genre all its own—you could call it sci-fi-martial-arts-family-drama.  Stephanie Hsu plays both Joy, an angsty teen-ager struggling with her immigrant mother, and Jobu, an omnipotent, interdimensional supervillain.  “The relationship between Evelyn and Joy in its simplest terms is very fraught,” Hsu tells &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jia-tolentino"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jia Tolentino&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;.  “It’s the story of a relationship of a daughter who’s a lesbian who is deeply longing for her mother’s acceptance … but they keep chasing each other around in the universe and they can just never find one another. Until of course they launch into the multiverse and become nemeses.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 03:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d1a1317b-e3e6-4bc6-a7c6-827e020670d0</guid><enclosure length="20064000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour051022_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1205571"/><category>children [lc]</category><category>despair</category><category>existentialism</category><category>film</category><category>immigration</category><category>movies</category><category>parents [lc]</category><category>storytelling</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour051022_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1205571"/><media:description type="plain">Stephanie Hsu on “Everything Everywhere All at Once”
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/05/TNY_final_aLeYg4V.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>20:54</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>“Everything Everywhere All At Once”</span> <span>is in a genre all its own—you could call it sci-fi-martial-arts-family-drama.  Stephanie Hsu plays both Joy, an angsty teen-ager struggling with her immigrant mother, and Jobu, an omnipotent, interdimensional supervillain.  “The relationship between Evelyn and Joy in its simplest terms is very fraught,” Hsu tells </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jia-tolentino"><span>Jia Tolentino</span></a><span>.  “It’s the story of a relationship of a daughter who’s a lesbian who is deeply longing for her mother’s acceptance … but they keep chasing each other around in the universe and they can just never find one another. Until of course they launch into the multiverse and become nemeses.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Stephanie Hsu on “Everything Everywhere All at Once”</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>“Everything Everywhere All At Once”</span> <span>is in a genre all its own—you could call it sci-fi-martial-arts-family-drama.  Stephanie Hsu plays both Joy, an angsty teen-ager struggling with her immigrant mother, and Jobu, an omnipotent, interdimensional supervillain.  “The relationship between Evelyn and Joy in its simplest terms is very fraught,” Hsu tells </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jia-tolentino"><span>Jia Tolentino</span></a><span>.  “It’s the story of a relationship of a daughter who’s a lesbian who is deeply longing for her mother’s acceptance … but they keep chasing each other around in the universe and they can just never find one another. Until of course they launch into the multiverse and become nemeses.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>“Everything Everywhere All At Once” is in a genre all its own—you could call it sci-fi-martial-arts-family-drama.  Stephanie Hsu plays both Joy, an angsty teen-ager struggling with her immigrant mother, and Jobu, an omnipotent, interdimensional supervillain.  “The relationship between Evelyn and Joy in its simplest terms is very fraught,” Hsu tells Jia Tolentino.  “It’s the story of a relationship of a daughter who’s a lesbian who is deeply longing for her mother’s acceptance … but they keep chasing each other around in the universe and they can just never find one another. Until of course they launch into the multiverse and become nemeses.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Last Abortion Clinic in Mississippi; and a Look at White Empathy
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/last-abortion-clinic-mississippi-and-look-white-empathy-pod1/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Last week, a draft opinion was leaked which suggests that a majority of Supreme Court Justices are ready to overturn the precedents of Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey—the decisions that have guaranteed a right to abortion at the federal level.  The case in question is Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, in which Mississippi officials seek to close the state’s last remaining abortion clinic under a law that bans performing an abortion after the fifteenth week of pregnancy—a point well before the time of fetal viability.  In November, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/rachel-monroe"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Rachel Monroe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; visited the Jackson abortion clinic, speaking to its director, Shannon Brewer; a physician who asked to remain anonymous, describing the risks to abortion providers; and a patient, who had driven all night from Texas, where she was not able to obtain an abortion. “Somebody else is telling me what I should do with my body, and it’s not right,” she said. “It’s my body. It’s my decision. It’s my choice. It’s my life. It’s my soul, if it’s going to Hell.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Produced with assistance from Ezekiel Bandy and Kim Green.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment originally aired November 19, 2021.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, the staff writer Alexis Okeowo talks with the producer Ngofeen Mputubwele about why the Ukrainian refugee crisis seems both familiar and startlingly different from conflicts in other parts of the world. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">53f53bdd-f464-423a-b730-228aea5ca71d</guid><enclosure length="27808000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour050622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1205572"/><category>abortion</category><category>history [lc]</category><category>medical</category><category>mississippi</category><category>news</category><category>politics</category><category>scotus</category><category>supreme court</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour050622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1205572"/><media:description type="plain">The Last Abortion Clinic in Mississippi; and a Look at White Empathy
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2021/11/Radio_Hour_Roe_v_Wade.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>28:58</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Last week, a draft opinion was leaked which suggests that a majority of Supreme Court Justices are ready to overturn the precedents of Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey—the decisions that have guaranteed a right to abortion at the federal level.  The case in question is Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, in which Mississippi officials seek to close the state’s last remaining abortion clinic under a law that bans performing an abortion after the fifteenth week of pregnancy—a point well before the time of fetal viability.  In November, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/rachel-monroe"><span>Rachel Monroe</span></a><span> visited the Jackson abortion clinic, speaking to its director, Shannon Brewer; a physician who asked to remain anonymous, describing the risks to abortion providers; and a patient, who had driven all night from Texas, where she was not able to obtain an abortion. “Somebody else is telling me what I should do with my body, and it’s not right,” she said. “It’s my body. It’s my decision. It’s my choice. It’s my life. It’s my soul, if it’s going to Hell.” </span><em><span>Produced with assistance from Ezekiel Bandy and Kim Green.</span></em><span> </span><em><span>This segment originally aired November 19, 2021.  </span></em></p>
<p><em><span>Plus, the staff writer Alexis Okeowo talks with the producer Ngofeen Mputubwele about why the Ukrainian refugee crisis seems both familiar and startlingly different from conflicts in other parts of the world. </span></em></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Last Abortion Clinic in Mississippi; and a Look at White Empathy</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Last week, a draft opinion was leaked which suggests that a majority of Supreme Court Justices are ready to overturn the precedents of Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey—the decisions that have guaranteed a right to abortion at the federal level.  The case in question is Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, in which Mississippi officials seek to close the state’s last remaining abortion clinic under a law that bans performing an abortion after the fifteenth week of pregnancy—a point well before the time of fetal viability.  In November, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/rachel-monroe"><span>Rachel Monroe</span></a><span> visited the Jackson abortion clinic, speaking to its director, Shannon Brewer; a physician who asked to remain anonymous, describing the risks to abortion providers; and a patient, who had driven all night from Texas, where she was not able to obtain an abortion. “Somebody else is telling me what I should do with my body, and it’s not right,” she said. “It’s my body. It’s my decision. It’s my choice. It’s my life. It’s my soul, if it’s going to Hell.” </span><em><span>Produced with assistance from Ezekiel Bandy and Kim Green.</span></em><span> </span><em><span>This segment originally aired November 19, 2021.  </span></em></p>
<p><em><span>Plus, the staff writer Alexis Okeowo talks with the producer Ngofeen Mputubwele about why the Ukrainian refugee crisis seems both familiar and startlingly different from conflicts in other parts of the world. </span></em></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Last week, a draft opinion was leaked which suggests that a majority of Supreme Court Justices are ready to overturn the precedents of Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey—the decisions that have guaranteed a right to abortion at the federal level.  The case in question is Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, in which Mississippi officials seek to close the state’s last remaining abortion clinic under a law that bans performing an abortion after the fifteenth week of pregnancy—a point well before the time of fetal viability.  In November, Rachel Monroe visited the Jackson abortion clinic, speaking to its director, Shannon Brewer; a physician who asked to remain anonymous, describing the risks to abortion providers; and a patient, who had driven all night from Texas, where she was not able to obtain an abortion. “Somebody else is telling me what I should do with my body, and it’s not right,” she said. “It’s my body. It’s my decision. It’s my choice. It’s my life. It’s my soul, if it’s going to Hell.” Produced with assistance from Ezekiel Bandy and Kim Green. This segment originally aired November 19, 2021.   Plus, the staff writer Alexis Okeowo talks with the producer Ngofeen Mputubwele about why the Ukrainian refugee crisis seems both familiar and startlingly different from conflicts in other parts of the world.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Rickie Lee Jones’s Life on the Road
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/rickie-lee-joness-life-road-pod2/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Rickie Lee Jones emerged into the pop world fully formed; her début album was nominated for five Grammys, in 1980, and she won for Best New Artist. One of the songs on that record was “The Last Chance Texaco,” and Jones has made that the title of her recent memoir. The song evokes a service station on a long stretch of highway, and Jones’s book reflects on her almost obsessive need to travel and uproot herself at almost any cost. “All I wanted to do was leave” from a very young age, she says. “When I talk about it from here, it seems like it was so horribly dangerous.” She adds, “Suddenly I’ll [say], ‘I think I’ll go to Big Sur,’ and I’m in a car, going. But the chaos and trouble that brings to a life!” The producer Scott Carrier, who hosts the podcast “Home of the Brave,” interviewed Jones near her home in New Orleans.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This story originally aired April 9, 2021.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 03:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a58879d9-8a62-4a7e-9cb5-d947660f49d4</guid><enclosure length="21056000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour050322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1203767"/><category>album</category><category>art</category><category>music</category><category>rickie lee jones</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour050322_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1203767"/><media:description type="plain">Rickie Lee Jones’s Life on the Road
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/04/RadioHour-RickieLeeJones-4x3.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>21:56</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Rickie Lee Jones emerged into the pop world fully formed; her début album was nominated for five Grammys, in 1980, and she won for Best New Artist. One of the songs on that record was “The Last Chance Texaco,” and Jones has made that the title of her recent memoir. The song evokes a service station on a long stretch of highway, and Jones’s book reflects on her almost obsessive need to travel and uproot herself at almost any cost. “All I wanted to do was leave” from a very young age, she says. “When I talk about it from here, it seems like it was so horribly dangerous.” She adds, “Suddenly I’ll [say], ‘I think I’ll go to Big Sur,’ and I’m in a car, going. But the chaos and trouble that brings to a life!” The producer Scott Carrier, who hosts the podcast “Home of the Brave,” interviewed Jones near her home in New Orleans.</span></p>
<p><i><span>This story originally aired April 9, 2021.</span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Rickie Lee Jones’s Life on the Road</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Rickie Lee Jones emerged into the pop world fully formed; her début album was nominated for five Grammys, in 1980, and she won for Best New Artist. One of the songs on that record was “The Last Chance Texaco,” and Jones has made that the title of her recent memoir. The song evokes a service station on a long stretch of highway, and Jones’s book reflects on her almost obsessive need to travel and uproot herself at almost any cost. “All I wanted to do was leave” from a very young age, she says. “When I talk about it from here, it seems like it was so horribly dangerous.” She adds, “Suddenly I’ll [say], ‘I think I’ll go to Big Sur,’ and I’m in a car, going. But the chaos and trouble that brings to a life!” The producer Scott Carrier, who hosts the podcast “Home of the Brave,” interviewed Jones near her home in New Orleans.</span></p>
<p><i><span>This story originally aired April 9, 2021.</span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Rickie Lee Jones emerged into the pop world fully formed; her début album was nominated for five Grammys, in 1980, and she won for Best New Artist. One of the songs on that record was “The Last Chance Texaco,” and Jones has made that the title of her recent memoir. The song evokes a service station on a long stretch of highway, and Jones’s book reflects on her almost obsessive need to travel and uproot herself at almost any cost. “All I wanted to do was leave” from a very young age, she says. “When I talk about it from here, it seems like it was so horribly dangerous.” She adds, “Suddenly I’ll [say], ‘I think I’ll go to Big Sur,’ and I’m in a car, going. But the chaos and trouble that brings to a life!” The producer Scott Carrier, who hosts the podcast “Home of the Brave,” interviewed Jones near her home in New Orleans. This story originally aired April 9, 2021.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>A Ukrainian Diplomat on the Future of Russian Aggression
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/ukrainian-diplomat-future-russian-aggression-pod1/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;As the Russian invasion of Ukraine enters a third month, prospects of ending the conflict are still nowhere in sight, and there seems to be no end to the destruction that Vladimir Putin is willing to inflict. Sergiy Kyslytsya, Ukraine’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, tells David Remnick that he expects Russia to continue escalating its attack leading up to May 9th, a day of military celebration in Russia commemorating the German surrender in the Second World War. “They will escalate attacks by missiles from the sky to terrorize Ukraine in general,” he predicts, “and to make the government more susceptible to surrender.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In contrast to President Volodymyr Zelensky—who was a political rookie when he took office, in 2019—Kyslytsya has spent his career in Ukraine’s foreign service. In the years after the Soviet breakup, he says, Ukraine wanted to both placate its neighbor and ally itself with Western institutions. This created a “cognitive dissonance,” he says, that prevented Ukraine from recognizing the extent of Russian aggression. Having watched as diplomacy failed, Kyslytsya still has to separate his work from the personal toll of Russia’s invasion on his family and friends. “I try not to engage emotionally because if I engage emotionally too much, I am not operational,” he says. “And if I am not operational . . . I’m of very little use for my government.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2604fcdf-9cb3-437b-9ac5-6d6d48981efc</guid><enclosure length="25216000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour042922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1203768"/><category>politics</category><category>russia [lc]</category><category>ukraine [lc]</category><category>ukraine_invasion</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour042922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1203768"/><media:description type="plain">A Ukrainian Diplomat on the Future of Russian Aggression
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2022/04/TNY_final_TNwdnOG.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>26:16</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>As the Russian invasion of Ukraine enters a third month, prospects of ending the conflict are still nowhere in sight, and there seems to be no end to the destruction that Vladimir Putin is willing to inflict. Sergiy Kyslytsya, Ukraine’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, tells David Remnick that he expects Russia to continue escalating its attack leading up to May 9th, a day of military celebration in Russia commemorating the German surrender in the Second World War. “They will escalate attacks by missiles from the sky to terrorize Ukraine in general,” he predicts, “and to make the government more susceptible to surrender.” </span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span>In contrast to President Volodymyr Zelensky—who was a political rookie when he took office, in 2019—Kyslytsya has spent his career in Ukraine’s foreign service. In the years after the Soviet breakup, he says, Ukraine wanted to both placate its neighbor and ally itself with Western institutions. This created a “cognitive dissonance,” he says, that prevented Ukraine from recognizing the extent of Russian aggression. Having watched as diplomacy failed, Kyslytsya still has to separate his work from the personal toll of Russia’s invasion on his family and friends. “I try not to engage emotionally because if I engage emotionally too much, I am not operational,” he says. “And if I am not operational . . . I’m of very little use for my government.”</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>A Ukrainian Diplomat on the Future of Russian Aggression</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>As the Russian invasion of Ukraine enters a third month, prospects of ending the conflict are still nowhere in sight, and there seems to be no end to the destruction that Vladimir Putin is willing to inflict. Sergiy Kyslytsya, Ukraine’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, tells David Remnick that he expects Russia to continue escalating its attack leading up to May 9th, a day of military celebration in Russia commemorating the German surrender in the Second World War. “They will escalate attacks by missiles from the sky to terrorize Ukraine in general,” he predicts, “and to make the government more susceptible to surrender.” </span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span>In contrast to President Volodymyr Zelensky—who was a political rookie when he took office, in 2019—Kyslytsya has spent his career in Ukraine’s foreign service. In the years after the Soviet breakup, he says, Ukraine wanted to both placate its neighbor and ally itself with Western institutions. This created a “cognitive dissonance,” he says, that prevented Ukraine from recognizing the extent of Russian aggression. Having watched as diplomacy failed, Kyslytsya still has to separate his work from the personal toll of Russia’s invasion on his family and friends. “I try not to engage emotionally because if I engage emotionally too much, I am not operational,” he says. “And if I am not operational . . . I’m of very little use for my government.”</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><author>wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>As the Russian invasion of Ukraine enters a third month, prospects of ending the conflict are still nowhere in sight, and there seems to be no end to the destruction that Vladimir Putin is willing to inflict. Sergiy Kyslytsya, Ukraine’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, tells David Remnick that he expects Russia to continue escalating its attack leading up to May 9th, a day of military celebration in Russia commemorating the German surrender in the Second World War. “They will escalate attacks by missiles from the sky to terrorize Ukraine in general,” he predicts, “and to make the government more susceptible to surrender.”    In contrast to President Volodymyr Zelensky—who was a political rookie when he took office, in 2019—Kyslytsya has spent his career in Ukraine’s foreign service. In the years after the Soviet breakup, he says, Ukraine wanted to both placate its neighbor and ally itself with Western institutions. This created a “cognitive dissonance,” he says, that prevented Ukraine from recognizing the extent of Russian aggression. Having watched as diplomacy failed, Kyslytsya still has to separate his work from the personal toll of Russia’s invasion on his family and friends. “I try not to engage emotionally because if I engage emotionally too much, I am not operational,” he says. “And if I am not operational . . . I’m of very little use for my government.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Viola Davis on Playing Michelle Obama, and Finding Her Voice as an Actor
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/viola-davis-playing-michelle-obama-and-finding-her-voice-actor-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Oscar-winning actor Viola Davis traces her career in Hollywood back to a single moment of inspiration from her childhood: watching Cicely Tyson star in the 1974 movie “The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman.” “I saw excellence and craft, and I saw transformation,” Davis tells David Remnick. “And more importantly, what it planted in me is that seed of—literally—I am not defined by the boundaries of my life.” In a new memoir, “Finding Me,” Davis writes of a difficult upbringing in Rhode Island, marked by poverty and an abusive father. She pursued her dream of attending the prestigious Juilliard School, but felt alienated by a white-focussed approach that left little room for her background or identity. She talks with Remnick about how she grew past these early challenges, the lingering impostor syndrome that many successful people experience, and how she prepared to play Michelle Obama in the series “The First Lady.” Plus, the cartoonist Liana Finck, a regular presence in&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt; The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;, explains how a ride on the Long Island Rail Road gets her creative ideas flowing; she can work among people without anyone talking to her. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 03:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b22aad06-6635-42b2-9177-14e5089ba49b</guid><enclosure length="29168000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour042622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1201490"/><category>books</category><category>cartoons</category><category>julliard</category><category>liana_finck</category><category>local_wnyc</category><category>long_island_railroad</category><category>memoir</category><category>michelle_obama</category><category>viola_davis. arts</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour042622_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1201490"/><media:description type="plain">Viola Davis on Playing Michelle Obama, and Finding Her Voice as an Actor
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/04/Violacredit_AB_DM.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>30:23</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The Oscar-winning actor Viola Davis traces her career in Hollywood back to a single moment of inspiration from her childhood: watching Cicely Tyson star in the 1974 movie “The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman.” “I saw excellence and craft, and I saw transformation,” Davis tells David Remnick. “And more importantly, what it planted in me is that seed of—literally—I am not defined by the boundaries of my life.” In a new memoir, “Finding Me,” Davis writes of a difficult upbringing in Rhode Island, marked by poverty and an abusive father. She pursued her dream of attending the prestigious Juilliard School, but felt alienated by a white-focussed approach that left little room for her background or identity. She talks with Remnick about how she grew past these early challenges, the lingering impostor syndrome that many successful people experience, and how she prepared to play Michelle Obama in the series “The First Lady.” </span><span>Plus, the cartoonist Liana Finck, a regular presence in</span><em><span><span> </span>The New Yorker</span></em><span>, explains how a ride on the Long Island Rail Road gets her creative ideas flowing; she can work among people without anyone talking to her.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Viola Davis on Playing Michelle Obama, and Finding Her Voice as an Actor</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The Oscar-winning actor Viola Davis traces her career in Hollywood back to a single moment of inspiration from her childhood: watching Cicely Tyson star in the 1974 movie “The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman.” “I saw excellence and craft, and I saw transformation,” Davis tells David Remnick. “And more importantly, what it planted in me is that seed of—literally—I am not defined by the boundaries of my life.” In a new memoir, “Finding Me,” Davis writes of a difficult upbringing in Rhode Island, marked by poverty and an abusive father. She pursued her dream of attending the prestigious Juilliard School, but felt alienated by a white-focussed approach that left little room for her background or identity. She talks with Remnick about how she grew past these early challenges, the lingering impostor syndrome that many successful people experience, and how she prepared to play Michelle Obama in the series “The First Lady.” </span><span>Plus, the cartoonist Liana Finck, a regular presence in</span><em><span><span> </span>The New Yorker</span></em><span>, explains how a ride on the Long Island Rail Road gets her creative ideas flowing; she can work among people without anyone talking to her.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The Oscar-winning actor Viola Davis traces her career in Hollywood back to a single moment of inspiration from her childhood: watching Cicely Tyson star in the 1974 movie “The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman.” “I saw excellence and craft, and I saw transformation,” Davis tells David Remnick. “And more importantly, what it planted in me is that seed of—literally—I am not defined by the boundaries of my life.” In a new memoir, “Finding Me,” Davis writes of a difficult upbringing in Rhode Island, marked by poverty and an abusive father. She pursued her dream of attending the prestigious Juilliard School, but felt alienated by a white-focussed approach that left little room for her background or identity. She talks with Remnick about how she grew past these early challenges, the lingering impostor syndrome that many successful people experience, and how she prepared to play Michelle Obama in the series “The First Lady.” Plus, the cartoonist Liana Finck, a regular presence in The New Yorker, explains how a ride on the Long Island Rail Road gets her creative ideas flowing; she can work among people without anyone talking to her.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Ronan Farrow on the Threat of Modern Spyware
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/ronan-farrow-threat-modern-spyware-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Ronan Farrow has published an &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/04/25/how-democracies-spy-on-their-citizens"&gt;&lt;span&gt;investigation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; into a software called Pegasus and its maker, NSO Group. Pegasus is one of the most invasive spywares known; it allows users—including law-enforcement officials or government authorities—to hack into a target’s smartphone, gaining access to photos, messages, and the feeds from a camera or microphone. NSO markets Pegasus as a tool to catch terrorists and other violent criminals, but once a surveillance tool is on the market it can be very difficult to control. Farrow finds that Pegasus is being used to suppress political opposition in democratic nations, including Spain. The largest known cluster of Pegasus attacks has targeted people in Catalonia who support the independence movement, which the Spanish government views as a threat. “This is not just an information-gathering tool,” Farrow tells David Remnick; “It’s an intimidation tactic, and it works.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">07a01b37-ff8c-4066-bd29-c43b59d96c56</guid><enclosure length="18624000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour042222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1201480"/><category>catalonia</category><category>hacking</category><category>political_dissent</category><category>spyware</category><category>surveillance</category><category>technology</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour042222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1201480"/><media:description type="plain">Ronan Farrow on the Threat of Modern Spyware
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2022/04/TNY_final.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>19:24</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Ronan Farrow has published an </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/04/25/how-democracies-spy-on-their-citizens"><span>investigation</span></a><span> into a software called Pegasus and its maker, NSO Group. Pegasus is one of the most invasive spywares known; it allows users—including law-enforcement officials or government authorities—to hack into a target’s smartphone, gaining access to photos, messages, and the feeds from a camera or microphone. NSO markets Pegasus as a tool to catch terrorists and other violent criminals, but once a surveillance tool is on the market it can be very difficult to control. Farrow finds that Pegasus is being used to suppress political opposition in democratic nations, including Spain. The largest known cluster of Pegasus attacks has targeted people in Catalonia who support the independence movement, which the Spanish government views as a threat. “This is not just an information-gathering tool,” Farrow tells David Remnick; “It’s an intimidation tactic, and it works.” </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Ronan Farrow on the Threat of Modern Spyware</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Ronan Farrow has published an </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/04/25/how-democracies-spy-on-their-citizens"><span>investigation</span></a><span> into a software called Pegasus and its maker, NSO Group. Pegasus is one of the most invasive spywares known; it allows users—including law-enforcement officials or government authorities—to hack into a target’s smartphone, gaining access to photos, messages, and the feeds from a camera or microphone. NSO markets Pegasus as a tool to catch terrorists and other violent criminals, but once a surveillance tool is on the market it can be very difficult to control. Farrow finds that Pegasus is being used to suppress political opposition in democratic nations, including Spain. The largest known cluster of Pegasus attacks has targeted people in Catalonia who support the independence movement, which the Spanish government views as a threat. “This is not just an information-gathering tool,” Farrow tells David Remnick; “It’s an intimidation tactic, and it works.” </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Ronan Farrow has published an investigation into a software called Pegasus and its maker, NSO Group. Pegasus is one of the most invasive spywares known; it allows users—including law-enforcement officials or government authorities—to hack into a target’s smartphone, gaining access to photos, messages, and the feeds from a camera or microphone. NSO markets Pegasus as a tool to catch terrorists and other violent criminals, but once a surveillance tool is on the market it can be very difficult to control. Farrow finds that Pegasus is being used to suppress political opposition in democratic nations, including Spain. The largest known cluster of Pegasus attacks has targeted people in Catalonia who support the independence movement, which the Spanish government views as a threat. “This is not just an information-gathering tool,” Farrow tells David Remnick; “It’s an intimidation tactic, and it works.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>“We’re All Going to the World’s Fair” and a Short History of Movies about the Internet
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/were-all-going-worlds-fair-and-short-history-movies-about-internet-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Internet can be a scary place in real life, and far more so in Jane Schoenbrun’s film “We’re All Going to the World’s Fair,” which premièred at the Sundance Film Festival last year and is being released in theatres and streaming. It’s a horror movie centered on a lonely and bored teen-age girl named Casey, who spends most of her time being online and trying to figure out who she is. She undertakes a ritual that she’s read about—the so-called World’s Fair Challenge—which is said to cause unknown and possibly dire changes. “Everyone wants to know, ‘Do you think the Internet is good or the Internet is bad?’ ” Schoenbrun told the Radio Hour’s &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.wnyc.org/people/alex-barron/"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Alex Barron&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. “That’s like asking, ‘Do you think that people are good or bad?’ There’s not a simple answer.” They spoke about the forty-year history of movies depicting the online world. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 03:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1f75dfb9-3d7a-410a-8563-d670468cab90</guid><enclosure length="16944000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour041922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1199389"/><category>arts</category><category>internet</category><category>movies</category><category>technology</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour041922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1199389"/><media:description type="plain">“We’re All Going to the World’s Fair” and a Short History of Movies about the Internet
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/04/shoenburn.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>17:39</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The Internet can be a scary place in real life, and far more so in Jane Schoenbrun’s film “We’re All Going to the World’s Fair,” which premièred at the Sundance Film Festival last year and is being released in theatres and streaming. It’s a horror movie centered on a lonely and bored teen-age girl named Casey, who spends most of her time being online and trying to figure out who she is. She undertakes a ritual that she’s read about—the so-called World’s Fair Challenge—which is said to cause unknown and possibly dire changes. “Everyone wants to know, ‘Do you think the Internet is good or the Internet is bad?’ ” Schoenbrun told the Radio Hour’s </span><a href="https://www.wnyc.org/people/alex-barron/"><span>Alex Barron</span></a><span>. “That’s like asking, ‘Do you think that people are good or bad?’ There’s not a simple answer.” They spoke about the forty-year history of movies depicting the online world. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>“We’re All Going to the World’s Fair” and a Short History of Movies about the Internet</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>The Internet can be a scary place in real life, and far more so in Jane Schoenbrun’s film “We’re All Going to the World’s Fair,” which premièred at the Sundance Film Festival last year and is being released in theatres and streaming. It’s a horror movie centered on a lonely and bored teen-age girl named Casey, who spends most of her time being online and trying to figure out who she is. She undertakes a ritual that she’s read about—the so-called World’s Fair Challenge—which is said to cause unknown and possibly dire changes. “Everyone wants to know, ‘Do you think the Internet is good or the Internet is bad?’ ” Schoenbrun told the Radio Hour’s </span><a href="https://www.wnyc.org/people/alex-barron/"><span>Alex Barron</span></a><span>. “That’s like asking, ‘Do you think that people are good or bad?’ There’s not a simple answer.” They spoke about the forty-year history of movies depicting the online world. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The Internet can be a scary place in real life, and far more so in Jane Schoenbrun’s film “We’re All Going to the World’s Fair,” which premièred at the Sundance Film Festival last year and is being released in theatres and streaming. It’s a horror movie centered on a lonely and bored teen-age girl named Casey, who spends most of her time being online and trying to figure out who she is. She undertakes a ritual that she’s read about—the so-called World’s Fair Challenge—which is said to cause unknown and possibly dire changes. “Everyone wants to know, ‘Do you think the Internet is good or the Internet is bad?’ ” Schoenbrun told the Radio Hour’s Alex Barron. “That’s like asking, ‘Do you think that people are good or bad?’ There’s not a simple answer.” They spoke about the forty-year history of movies depicting the online world.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Jennifer Egan on the Literary Pleasures of the Concept Album
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/jennifer-egan-literary-pleasures-concept-album-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jennifer Egan’s new novel, “The Candy House,” one of the most anticipated books of the year, has just been published. It is related—not a sequel exactly, but something like a sibling—to her Pulitzer Prize-winning “A Visit from the Goon Squad,” from 2010. That earlier book was largely about the music business, and Egan, a passionate music fan, has described its unusual structure as having been inspired by the concept albums of her youth. “The very nature of a concept album is that it tells one big story in small pieces that sound very different from each other and that sort of collide,” she tells David Remnick. “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;I thought, How would I do that narratively? I ask myself that all the time.” We asked Egan to speak about three concept albums that influenced her, and she picked&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Who’s “Quadrophenia,” about a disaffected, working-class mod in the nineteen-sixties; Patti Smith’s “Horses”; and Eminem’s “Recovery.”  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, a story about two young boys, obsessed with basketball cards, who schemed to get a rare triptych card from a third friend. Decades later, their ill-gotten prize might be worth a lot of money—but whose money is it? The staff writer Charles Bethea looks at the grown-up consequences of a childhood prank.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b382fa0b-001a-4f70-b97a-2b34428ed359</guid><enclosure length="30736000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour041222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1197424"/><category>arts</category><category>basketball</category><category>books</category><category>jennifer_egan</category><category>life</category><category>magic_johnson</category><category>music</category><category>patti_smith</category><category>sports</category><category>the_who</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour041222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1197424"/><media:description type="plain">Jennifer Egan on the Literary Pleasures of the Concept Album
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/04/Jennifer-Egan-by-Pieter-M.-Van-Hattem.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>32:01</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Jennifer Egan’s new novel, “The Candy House,” one of the most anticipated books of the year, has just been published. It is related—not a sequel exactly, but something like a sibling—to her Pulitzer Prize-winning “A Visit from the Goon Squad,” from 2010. That earlier book was largely about the music business, and Egan, a passionate music fan, has described its unusual structure as having been inspired by the concept albums of her youth. “The very nature of a concept album is that it tells one big story in small pieces that sound very different from each other and that sort of collide,” she tells David Remnick. “</span><span>I thought, How would I do that narratively? I ask myself that all the time.” We asked Egan to speak about three concept albums that influenced her, and she picked </span><span>The Who’s “Quadrophenia,” about a disaffected, working-class mod in the nineteen-sixties; Patti Smith’s “Horses”; and Eminem’s “Recovery.”  </span><span>Plus, a story about two young boys, obsessed with basketball cards, who schemed to get a rare triptych card from a third friend. Decades later, their ill-gotten prize might be worth a lot of money—but whose money is it? The staff writer Charles Bethea looks at the grown-up consequences of a childhood prank.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Jennifer Egan on the Literary Pleasures of the Concept Album</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Jennifer Egan’s new novel, “The Candy House,” one of the most anticipated books of the year, has just been published. It is related—not a sequel exactly, but something like a sibling—to her Pulitzer Prize-winning “A Visit from the Goon Squad,” from 2010. That earlier book was largely about the music business, and Egan, a passionate music fan, has described its unusual structure as having been inspired by the concept albums of her youth. “The very nature of a concept album is that it tells one big story in small pieces that sound very different from each other and that sort of collide,” she tells David Remnick. “</span><span>I thought, How would I do that narratively? I ask myself that all the time.” We asked Egan to speak about three concept albums that influenced her, and she picked </span><span>The Who’s “Quadrophenia,” about a disaffected, working-class mod in the nineteen-sixties; Patti Smith’s “Horses”; and Eminem’s “Recovery.”  </span><span>Plus, a story about two young boys, obsessed with basketball cards, who schemed to get a rare triptych card from a third friend. Decades later, their ill-gotten prize might be worth a lot of money—but whose money is it? The staff writer Charles Bethea looks at the grown-up consequences of a childhood prank.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Jennifer Egan’s new novel, “The Candy House,” one of the most anticipated books of the year, has just been published. It is related—not a sequel exactly, but something like a sibling—to her Pulitzer Prize-winning “A Visit from the Goon Squad,” from 2010. That earlier book was largely about the music business, and Egan, a passionate music fan, has described its unusual structure as having been inspired by the concept albums of her youth. “The very nature of a concept album is that it tells one big story in small pieces that sound very different from each other and that sort of collide,” she tells David Remnick. “I thought, How would I do that narratively? I ask myself that all the time.” We asked Egan to speak about three concept albums that influenced her, and she picked The Who’s “Quadrophenia,” about a disaffected, working-class mod in the nineteen-sixties; Patti Smith’s “Horses”; and Eminem’s “Recovery.”  Plus, a story about two young boys, obsessed with basketball cards, who schemed to get a rare triptych card from a third friend. Decades later, their ill-gotten prize might be worth a lot of money—but whose money is it? The staff writer Charles Bethea looks at the grown-up consequences of a childhood prank.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Anita Hill and Jane Mayer on Ketanji Brown Jackson, and the State of the Supreme Court
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/anita-hill-and-jane-mayer-ketanji-brown-jackson-and-state-supreme-court-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Ketanji Brown Jackson has been voted in as a Supreme Court Justice—the first Black woman to serve in that role. But, to reach this milestone, Jackson has faced enormous hurdles at every turn, including confirmation hearings that featured blatant political grandstanding and barely disguised race-baiting. Nominations have become so partisan that, on both the left and the right, the Court itself is commonly viewed as merely a tool of the party that picked its members, and several polls report a decline in public confidence in the Court. “The real political end” of the attacks on Brown Jackson, Hill believes, “is to denigrate her personally, honestly, but also to really reduce the validity of any opinions that she ultimately writes. Even though . . . many of her opinions will be dissenting opinions, dissenting opinions can carry a lot of weight.” Meanwhile, Justice Clarence Thomas’s decision not to recuse himself from cases related to the January 6th insurrection, even after it came to light that his wife Ginni Thomas actively sought to influence Trump Administration officials to try to overturn the Presidential election, also undercuts the court’s impartiality. It seems that the reputation and independence of the Court is in serious trouble. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Anita Hill, a professor of social policy, law, and women’s studies at Brandeis University, spoke with David Remnick about the Ketanji Brown Jackson hearings, along with the staff writer &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jane-mayer"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jane Mayer&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, who is &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/01/31/is-ginni-thomas-a-threat-to-the-supreme-court"&gt;&lt;span&gt;reporting on the Ginni Thomas controversy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. (Hill, who testified in the 1991 Thomas nomination hearings, has declined to speak about his stance on recusal.) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9502f2e2-fa5f-4cb4-959e-07ddfef7db3d</guid><enclosure length="17360000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour040822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1197423"/><category>anita_hill</category><category>clarence_thomas</category><category>ketanji_brown_jackson</category><category>social_justice</category><category>supreme_court</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour040822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1197423"/><media:description type="plain">Anita Hill and Jane Mayer on Ketanji Brown Jackson, and the State of the Supreme Court
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/04/AP22080703088022.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>18:05</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Ketanji Brown Jackson has been voted in as a Supreme Court Justice—the first Black woman to serve in that role. But, to reach this milestone, Jackson has faced enormous hurdles at every turn, including confirmation hearings that featured blatant political grandstanding and barely disguised race-baiting. Nominations have become so partisan that, on both the left and the right, the Court itself is commonly viewed as merely a tool of the party that picked its members, and several polls report a decline in public confidence in the Court. “The real political end” of the attacks on Brown Jackson, Hill believes, “is to denigrate her personally, honestly, but also to really reduce the validity of any opinions that she ultimately writes. Even though . . . many of her opinions will be dissenting opinions, dissenting opinions can carry a lot of weight.” Meanwhile, Justice Clarence Thomas’s decision not to recuse himself from cases related to the January 6th insurrection, even after it came to light that his wife Ginni Thomas actively sought to influence Trump Administration officials to try to overturn the Presidential election, also undercuts the court’s impartiality. It seems that the reputation and independence of the Court is in serious trouble. </span></p>
<p><span>Anita Hill, a professor of social policy, law, and women’s studies at Brandeis University, spoke with David Remnick about the Ketanji Brown Jackson hearings, along with the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jane-mayer"><span>Jane Mayer</span></a><span>, who is </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/01/31/is-ginni-thomas-a-threat-to-the-supreme-court"><span>reporting on the Ginni Thomas controversy</span></a><span>. (Hill, who testified in the 1991 Thomas nomination hearings, has declined to speak about his stance on recusal.) </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Anita Hill and Jane Mayer on Ketanji Brown Jackson, and the State of the Supreme Court</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Ketanji Brown Jackson has been voted in as a Supreme Court Justice—the first Black woman to serve in that role. But, to reach this milestone, Jackson has faced enormous hurdles at every turn, including confirmation hearings that featured blatant political grandstanding and barely disguised race-baiting. Nominations have become so partisan that, on both the left and the right, the Court itself is commonly viewed as merely a tool of the party that picked its members, and several polls report a decline in public confidence in the Court. “The real political end” of the attacks on Brown Jackson, Hill believes, “is to denigrate her personally, honestly, but also to really reduce the validity of any opinions that she ultimately writes. Even though . . . many of her opinions will be dissenting opinions, dissenting opinions can carry a lot of weight.” Meanwhile, Justice Clarence Thomas’s decision not to recuse himself from cases related to the January 6th insurrection, even after it came to light that his wife Ginni Thomas actively sought to influence Trump Administration officials to try to overturn the Presidential election, also undercuts the court’s impartiality. It seems that the reputation and independence of the Court is in serious trouble. </span></p>
<p><span>Anita Hill, a professor of social policy, law, and women’s studies at Brandeis University, spoke with David Remnick about the Ketanji Brown Jackson hearings, along with the staff writer </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/jane-mayer"><span>Jane Mayer</span></a><span>, who is </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/01/31/is-ginni-thomas-a-threat-to-the-supreme-court"><span>reporting on the Ginni Thomas controversy</span></a><span>. (Hill, who testified in the 1991 Thomas nomination hearings, has declined to speak about his stance on recusal.) </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Ketanji Brown Jackson has been voted in as a Supreme Court Justice—the first Black woman to serve in that role. But, to reach this milestone, Jackson has faced enormous hurdles at every turn, including confirmation hearings that featured blatant political grandstanding and barely disguised race-baiting. Nominations have become so partisan that, on both the left and the right, the Court itself is commonly viewed as merely a tool of the party that picked its members, and several polls report a decline in public confidence in the Court. “The real political end” of the attacks on Brown Jackson, Hill believes, “is to denigrate her personally, honestly, but also to really reduce the validity of any opinions that she ultimately writes. Even though . . . many of her opinions will be dissenting opinions, dissenting opinions can carry a lot of weight.” Meanwhile, Justice Clarence Thomas’s decision not to recuse himself from cases related to the January 6th insurrection, even after it came to light that his wife Ginni Thomas actively sought to influence Trump Administration officials to try to overturn the Presidential election, also undercuts the court’s impartiality. It seems that the reputation and independence of the Court is in serious trouble.  Anita Hill, a professor of social policy, law, and women’s studies at Brandeis University, spoke with David Remnick about the Ketanji Brown Jackson hearings, along with the staff writer Jane Mayer, who is reporting on the Ginni Thomas controversy. (Hill, who testified in the 1991 Thomas nomination hearings, has declined to speak about his stance on recusal.)</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>The Missing Boater
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/missing-boater-pod-rerun/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Dick Conant spent years of his life crisscrossing America by canoe, like a Mark Twain character. On land, he worked a variety of jobs and was often homeless, but paddling on a river, he was king. By chance, on a voyage which began near the Canadian border, on his way to Florida, Conant met Ben McGrath, a&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Yorker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;staff writer, outside McGrath’s home on the Hudson River. McGrath’s&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/12/14/the-wayfarer"&gt;piece&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; about Conant appeared in&lt;span&gt; the December 14, 2015, issue of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;this week; here, he tells the story of a troubled man who found refuge in adventure.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Ben McGrath’s book about Conant, “Riverman: An American Odyssey,” will be published in April. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Originally aired December 11, 2015.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e0f6f108-9bff-410d-9c52-9b0394a3632b</guid><enclosure length="19504000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour040522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1195274"/><category>ben_mcgrath</category><category>boating</category><category>hudson_river</category><category>life</category><category>storytelling</category><category>the_new_yorker</category><category>travel</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour040522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1195274"/><media:description type="plain">The Missing Boater
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/1/dick.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>20:19</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Dick Conant spent years of his life crisscrossing America by canoe, like a Mark Twain character. On land, he worked a variety of jobs and was often homeless, but paddling on a river, he was king. By chance, on a voyage which began near the Canadian border, on his way to Florida, Conant met Ben McGrath, a <em>New Yorker</em> staff writer, outside McGrath’s home on the Hudson River. McGrath’s </span><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/12/14/the-wayfarer">piece</a><span> about Conant appeared in the December 14, 2015, issue of </span><em>The New Yorker</em><span> this week; here, he tells the story of a troubled man who found refuge in adventure.</span></p>
<p><span>Ben McGrath’s book about Conant, “Riverman: An American Odyssey,” will be published in April. </span></p>
<p><em><span>Originally aired December 11, 2015.</span></em></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>The Missing Boater</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Dick Conant spent years of his life crisscrossing America by canoe, like a Mark Twain character. On land, he worked a variety of jobs and was often homeless, but paddling on a river, he was king. By chance, on a voyage which began near the Canadian border, on his way to Florida, Conant met Ben McGrath, a <em>New Yorker</em> staff writer, outside McGrath’s home on the Hudson River. McGrath’s </span><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/12/14/the-wayfarer">piece</a><span> about Conant appeared in the December 14, 2015, issue of </span><em>The New Yorker</em><span> this week; here, he tells the story of a troubled man who found refuge in adventure.</span></p>
<p><span>Ben McGrath’s book about Conant, “Riverman: An American Odyssey,” will be published in April. </span></p>
<p><em><span>Originally aired December 11, 2015.</span></em></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Dick Conant spent years of his life crisscrossing America by canoe, like a Mark Twain character. On land, he worked a variety of jobs and was often homeless, but paddling on a river, he was king. By chance, on a voyage which began near the Canadian border, on his way to Florida, Conant met Ben McGrath, a New Yorker staff writer, outside McGrath’s home on the Hudson River. McGrath’s piece about Conant appeared in the December 14, 2015, issue of The New Yorker this week; here, he tells the story of a troubled man who found refuge in adventure. Ben McGrath’s book about Conant, “Riverman: An American Odyssey,” will be published in April.  Originally aired December 11, 2015.  </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Investigating January 6th
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/investigating-january-6th-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;With a judge declaring that Donald Trump “more likely than not” committed a felony in his attempt to overturn the Presidential election, the congressional committee investigating January 6th is racing to finish its work before the looming midterm elections. Amy Davidson Sorkin and the legal scholar Jeannie Suk Gersen talk with David Remnick about the law and the politics of holding Trump accountable. And the music writer Sheldon Pearce shares three artists that didn’t get their due in the Grammy nominations. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">48d50d58-333f-449f-ab82-3254ecef28d4</guid><enclosure length="27584000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour040122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1194866"/><category>donald_trump</category><category>january_6th</category><category>midterm_elections</category><category>national_news</category><category>politics</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour040122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1194866"/><media:description type="plain">Investigating January 6th
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2021/01/RadioHour-Capitol-4x3.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>28:44</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>With a judge declaring that Donald Trump “more likely than not” committed a felony in his attempt to overturn the Presidential election, the congressional committee investigating January 6th is racing to finish its work before the looming midterm elections. Amy Davidson Sorkin and the legal scholar Jeannie Suk Gersen talk with David Remnick about the law and the politics of holding Trump accountable. And the music writer Sheldon Pearce shares three artists that didn’t get their due in the Grammy nominations. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Investigating January 6th</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>With a judge declaring that Donald Trump “more likely than not” committed a felony in his attempt to overturn the Presidential election, the congressional committee investigating January 6th is racing to finish its work before the looming midterm elections. Amy Davidson Sorkin and the legal scholar Jeannie Suk Gersen talk with David Remnick about the law and the politics of holding Trump accountable. And the music writer Sheldon Pearce shares three artists that didn’t get their due in the Grammy nominations. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>With a judge declaring that Donald Trump “more likely than not” committed a felony in his attempt to overturn the Presidential election, the congressional committee investigating January 6th is racing to finish its work before the looming midterm elections. Amy Davidson Sorkin and the legal scholar Jeannie Suk Gersen talk with David Remnick about the law and the politics of holding Trump accountable. And the music writer Sheldon Pearce shares three artists that didn’t get their due in the Grammy nominations. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Connor Ratliff Talks with Sarah Larson, Plus Chef Bryant Terry
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/connor-ratliff-talks-sarah-larson-plus-chef-bryant-terry/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;An aspiring actor named Connor Ratliff thought he had it made when he got a small part on the 2001 miniseries “Band of Brothers,” in an episode directed by Hollywood legend Tom Hanks. The day before shooting his scene, Ratliff was unceremoniously fired by Hanks, who said the rookie had “dead eyes.” It was a life-altering disappointment for Ratliff. He told&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/sarah-larson"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Sarah Larson&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;how he came to launch the podcast “Dead Eyes,” which explores failure as a universal part of life—in show business and beyond. When Ratliff was able to land Tom Hanks as a guest on the show, fans thought their interview would bring “Dead Eyes” to a close. But Ratliff has other ideas. Plus,&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Helen Rosner talks with the cookbook author and food-justice activist Bryant Terry about uplifting diverse traditions in Black cooking and reclaiming veganism from white hipsters.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 03:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">95c9242b-89aa-40ca-abfb-cb3ccc472120</guid><enclosure length="27936000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour032922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1193047"/><category>bryant_terry</category><category>comedy</category><category>connor_ratliff</category><category>cooking</category><category>food</category><category>podcast</category><category>tom_hanks</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour032922_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1193047"/><media:description type="plain">Connor Ratliff Talks with Sarah Larson, Plus Chef Bryant Terry
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2022/03/Radio_Hour_Connor_Ratliff.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>29:06</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>An aspiring actor named Connor Ratliff thought he had it made when he got a small part on the 2001 miniseries “Band of Brothers,” in an episode directed by Hollywood legend Tom Hanks. The day before shooting his scene, Ratliff was unceremoniously fired by Hanks, who said the rookie had “dead eyes.” It was a life-altering disappointment for Ratliff. He told </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/sarah-larson"><span>Sarah Larson</span></a><span> how he came to launch the podcast “Dead Eyes,” which explores failure as a universal part of life—in show business and beyond. When Ratliff was able to land Tom Hanks as a guest on the show, fans thought their interview would bring “Dead Eyes” to a close. But Ratliff has other ideas. Plus, <span>Helen Rosner talks with the cookbook author and food-justice activist Bryant Terry about uplifting diverse traditions in Black cooking and reclaiming veganism from white hipsters.</span></span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Connor Ratliff Talks with Sarah Larson, Plus Chef Bryant Terry</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>An aspiring actor named Connor Ratliff thought he had it made when he got a small part on the 2001 miniseries “Band of Brothers,” in an episode directed by Hollywood legend Tom Hanks. The day before shooting his scene, Ratliff was unceremoniously fired by Hanks, who said the rookie had “dead eyes.” It was a life-altering disappointment for Ratliff. He told </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/sarah-larson"><span>Sarah Larson</span></a><span> how he came to launch the podcast “Dead Eyes,” which explores failure as a universal part of life—in show business and beyond. When Ratliff was able to land Tom Hanks as a guest on the show, fans thought their interview would bring “Dead Eyes” to a close. But Ratliff has other ideas. Plus, <span>Helen Rosner talks with the cookbook author and food-justice activist Bryant Terry about uplifting diverse traditions in Black cooking and reclaiming veganism from white hipsters.</span></span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>An aspiring actor named Connor Ratliff thought he had it made when he got a small part on the 2001 miniseries “Band of Brothers,” in an episode directed by Hollywood legend Tom Hanks. The day before shooting his scene, Ratliff was unceremoniously fired by Hanks, who said the rookie had “dead eyes.” It was a life-altering disappointment for Ratliff. He told Sarah Larson how he came to launch the podcast “Dead Eyes,” which explores failure as a universal part of life—in show business and beyond. When Ratliff was able to land Tom Hanks as a guest on the show, fans thought their interview would bring “Dead Eyes” to a close. But Ratliff has other ideas. Plus, Helen Rosner talks with the cookbook author and food-justice activist Bryant Terry about uplifting diverse traditions in Black cooking and reclaiming veganism from white hipsters.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Jill Lepore on Parents’ Rights and the Culture War 
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/jill-lepore-parents-rights-and-culture-war-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;A wave of book bannings sweeping the country, along with conservative fury over titles like “Antiracist Baby,” seems like a backlash against the heightened racial consciousness of the post-George Floyd era. The historian and staff writer Jill Lepore sees these conflicts as the continuation of an old dynamic. She relates today’s “anti-anti-racism” movement to the anti-evolution campaign of the nineteen-twenties, which included the prosecution of a Tennessee teacher for teaching Darwin’s theory in a high-school class. Lepore tells David Remnick that what links these battles over biology and history is the argument that parents have the right to determine their children’s education in public schools. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">308334af-0d05-4c80-b1ec-b28425eae178</guid><enclosure length="17616000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour032522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1193046"/><category>critical_race_theory</category><category>history</category><category>racism</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour032522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1193046"/><media:description type="plain">Jill Lepore on Parents’ Rights and the Culture War 
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/03/AP21162858949395.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>18:21</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>A wave of book bannings sweeping the country, along with conservative fury over titles like “Antiracist Baby,” seems like a backlash against the heightened racial consciousness of the post-George Floyd era. The historian and staff writer Jill Lepore sees these conflicts as the continuation of an old dynamic. She relates today’s “anti-anti-racism” movement to the anti-evolution campaign of the nineteen-twenties, which included the prosecution of a Tennessee teacher for teaching Darwin’s theory in a high-school class. Lepore tells David Remnick that what links these battles over biology and history is the argument that parents have the right to determine their children’s education in public schools. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Jill Lepore on Parents’ Rights and the Culture War </itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>A wave of book bannings sweeping the country, along with conservative fury over titles like “Antiracist Baby,” seems like a backlash against the heightened racial consciousness of the post-George Floyd era. The historian and staff writer Jill Lepore sees these conflicts as the continuation of an old dynamic. She relates today’s “anti-anti-racism” movement to the anti-evolution campaign of the nineteen-twenties, which included the prosecution of a Tennessee teacher for teaching Darwin’s theory in a high-school class. Lepore tells David Remnick that what links these battles over biology and history is the argument that parents have the right to determine their children’s education in public schools. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>A wave of book bannings sweeping the country, along with conservative fury over titles like “Antiracist Baby,” seems like a backlash against the heightened racial consciousness of the post-George Floyd era. The historian and staff writer Jill Lepore sees these conflicts as the continuation of an old dynamic. She relates today’s “anti-anti-racism” movement to the anti-evolution campaign of the nineteen-twenties, which included the prosecution of a Tennessee teacher for teaching Darwin’s theory in a high-school class. Lepore tells David Remnick that what links these battles over biology and history is the argument that parents have the right to determine their children’s education in public schools.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Returning to the Office . . . While Black
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/returning-office-while-black-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;“&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Coming back to work is partially about surveillance and micromanagement,” Keisha, a podcasting executive, says. “Everybody feels it, but people of color feel it in a different way.” For workers who have been remote for the better part of two years, returning to the office is undeniably complicated. For some Black workers who didn’t feel at ease in majority-white offices to begin with, the complications are even greater. Racial microaggressions abound, and, for some, the stress of excessive visibility that comes with being a minority never goes away. “I would love to be ‘feet on the couch relaxed,’ like some of my colleagues in the past,” Keisha says, but “I don’t know if I could allow myself that.” As an entrepreneur named James put it, “Black folks aren’t really allowed to have bad days.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Radio Hour’s KalaLea talks with four Black professionals and compares their experience to that of Robert Churchwell, a Black reporter hired by the Nashville &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Banner&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; in 1950. Churchwell was excluded from the white newsroom and worked from home for five years.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Audio from an interview with Robert Churchwell comes from the Civil Rights Oral History Project, Special Collections, Nashville Public Library.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">155d7b71-61cb-4a97-8a30-36caf95538f4</guid><enclosure length="19024000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour032122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1190749"/><category>history</category><category>microaggressions</category><category>offices</category><category>racism</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour032122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1190749"/><media:description type="plain">Returning to the Office . . . While Black
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/03/negative-space-desk-mouse-keyboard-angle.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>19:49</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>“</span><span>Coming back to work is partially about surveillance and micromanagement,” Keisha, a podcasting executive, says. “Everybody feels it, but people of color feel it in a different way.” For workers who have been remote for the better part of two years, returning to the office is undeniably complicated. For some Black workers who didn’t feel at ease in majority-white offices to begin with, the complications are even greater. Racial microaggressions abound, and, for some, the stress of excessive visibility that comes with being a minority never goes away. “I would love to be ‘feet on the couch relaxed,’ like some of my colleagues in the past,” Keisha says, but “I don’t know if I could allow myself that.” As an entrepreneur named James put it, “Black folks aren’t really allowed to have bad days.” </span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span>The Radio Hour’s KalaLea talks with four Black professionals and compares their experience to that of Robert Churchwell, a Black reporter hired by the Nashville </span><i><span>Banner</span></i><span> in 1950. Churchwell was excluded from the white newsroom and worked from home for five years.  </span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><i><span>Audio from an interview with Robert Churchwell comes from the Civil Rights Oral History Project, Special Collections, Nashville Public Library.</span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Returning to the Office . . . While Black</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>“</span><span>Coming back to work is partially about surveillance and micromanagement,” Keisha, a podcasting executive, says. “Everybody feels it, but people of color feel it in a different way.” For workers who have been remote for the better part of two years, returning to the office is undeniably complicated. For some Black workers who didn’t feel at ease in majority-white offices to begin with, the complications are even greater. Racial microaggressions abound, and, for some, the stress of excessive visibility that comes with being a minority never goes away. “I would love to be ‘feet on the couch relaxed,’ like some of my colleagues in the past,” Keisha says, but “I don’t know if I could allow myself that.” As an entrepreneur named James put it, “Black folks aren’t really allowed to have bad days.” </span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span>The Radio Hour’s KalaLea talks with four Black professionals and compares their experience to that of Robert Churchwell, a Black reporter hired by the Nashville </span><i><span>Banner</span></i><span> in 1950. Churchwell was excluded from the white newsroom and worked from home for five years.  </span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><i><span>Audio from an interview with Robert Churchwell comes from the Civil Rights Oral History Project, Special Collections, Nashville Public Library.</span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>“Coming back to work is partially about surveillance and micromanagement,” Keisha, a podcasting executive, says. “Everybody feels it, but people of color feel it in a different way.” For workers who have been remote for the better part of two years, returning to the office is undeniably complicated. For some Black workers who didn’t feel at ease in majority-white offices to begin with, the complications are even greater. Racial microaggressions abound, and, for some, the stress of excessive visibility that comes with being a minority never goes away. “I would love to be ‘feet on the couch relaxed,’ like some of my colleagues in the past,” Keisha says, but “I don’t know if I could allow myself that.” As an entrepreneur named James put it, “Black folks aren’t really allowed to have bad days.”    The Radio Hour’s KalaLea talks with four Black professionals and compares their experience to that of Robert Churchwell, a Black reporter hired by the Nashville Banner in 1950. Churchwell was excluded from the white newsroom and worked from home for five years.     Audio from an interview with Robert Churchwell comes from the Civil Rights Oral History Project, Special Collections, Nashville Public Library.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Radio Ukraine
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/radio-ukraine-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Kraina FM&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;is a radio station that broadcasts in Kyiv and more than twenty other cities, playing Ukrainian-language rock and pop. When Russia invaded Ukraine, it took on the mantle of “the station of national resistance,” airing news bulletins and logistical information like requests for supplies. The radio hosts began adding jokes about the invading Russians, and advice from a psychologist about talking to children about the war; a writer told fairy tales on air to occupy those kids during the stressful nights of wartime. The station staff has dispersed, with Bogdan Bolkhovetsky, the general manager, and Roman Davydov, the program director, holed up in a town in the Carpathians, keeping production moving over unreliable Internet and communicating with listeners by text. They don’t know how many of their broadcasting stations are still functioning, and their tower in Kyiv could be destroyed at any time. But “we are not doing anything heroic,” Bolkhovetsky told Nicolas Niarchos, who visited their makeshift studio. “We are still in a lot of luck, having what we have right now. Thousands of people were not so lucky as we are. . . . We’re just doing what we can under these unusual circumstances.” Plus, we present the 2022 Brody Awards—the critic Richard Brody’s assessment of the best performances and the best films of the year.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2022 16:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e975c654-3186-431d-8af2-b34c19e154e2</guid><enclosure length="29520000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour031822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1190745"/><category>arts</category><category>film</category><category>media</category><category>oscars</category><category>radio</category><category>richard_brody</category><category>ukraine</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour031822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1190745"/><media:description type="plain">Radio Ukraine
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2022/03/Radio_Hour_Ukraine_Radio.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>30:45</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Kraina FM</span><span> is a radio station that broadcasts in Kyiv and more than twenty other cities, playing Ukrainian-language rock and pop. When Russia invaded Ukraine, it took on the mantle of “the station of national resistance,” airing news bulletins and logistical information like requests for supplies. The radio hosts began adding jokes about the invading Russians, and advice from a psychologist about talking to children about the war; a writer told fairy tales on air to occupy those kids during the stressful nights of wartime. The station staff has dispersed, with Bogdan Bolkhovetsky, the general manager, and Roman Davydov, the program director, holed up in a town in the Carpathians, keeping production moving over unreliable Internet and communicating with listeners by text. They don’t know how many of their broadcasting stations are still functioning, and their tower in Kyiv could be destroyed at any time. But “we are not doing anything heroic,” Bolkhovetsky told Nicolas Niarchos, who visited their makeshift studio. “We are still in a lot of luck, having what we have right now. Thousands of people were not so lucky as we are. . . . We’re just doing what we can under these unusual circumstances.” Plus, we present the 2022 Brody Awards—the critic Richard Brody’s assessment of the best performances and the best films of the year. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Radio Ukraine</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Kraina FM</span><span> is a radio station that broadcasts in Kyiv and more than twenty other cities, playing Ukrainian-language rock and pop. When Russia invaded Ukraine, it took on the mantle of “the station of national resistance,” airing news bulletins and logistical information like requests for supplies. The radio hosts began adding jokes about the invading Russians, and advice from a psychologist about talking to children about the war; a writer told fairy tales on air to occupy those kids during the stressful nights of wartime. The station staff has dispersed, with Bogdan Bolkhovetsky, the general manager, and Roman Davydov, the program director, holed up in a town in the Carpathians, keeping production moving over unreliable Internet and communicating with listeners by text. They don’t know how many of their broadcasting stations are still functioning, and their tower in Kyiv could be destroyed at any time. But “we are not doing anything heroic,” Bolkhovetsky told Nicolas Niarchos, who visited their makeshift studio. “We are still in a lot of luck, having what we have right now. Thousands of people were not so lucky as we are. . . . We’re just doing what we can under these unusual circumstances.” Plus, we present the 2022 Brody Awards—the critic Richard Brody’s assessment of the best performances and the best films of the year. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Kraina FM is a radio station that broadcasts in Kyiv and more than twenty other cities, playing Ukrainian-language rock and pop. When Russia invaded Ukraine, it took on the mantle of “the station of national resistance,” airing news bulletins and logistical information like requests for supplies. The radio hosts began adding jokes about the invading Russians, and advice from a psychologist about talking to children about the war; a writer told fairy tales on air to occupy those kids during the stressful nights of wartime. The station staff has dispersed, with Bogdan Bolkhovetsky, the general manager, and Roman Davydov, the program director, holed up in a town in the Carpathians, keeping production moving over unreliable Internet and communicating with listeners by text. They don’t know how many of their broadcasting stations are still functioning, and their tower in Kyiv could be destroyed at any time. But “we are not doing anything heroic,” Bolkhovetsky told Nicolas Niarchos, who visited their makeshift studio. “We are still in a lot of luck, having what we have right now. Thousands of people were not so lucky as we are. . . . We’re just doing what we can under these unusual circumstances.” Plus, we present the 2022 Brody Awards—the critic Richard Brody’s assessment of the best performances and the best films of the year.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Jane Campion on “The Power of the Dog”
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/jane-campion-power-dog-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Jane Campion’s “The Power of the Dog” opens like a classic Western: cattle are herded across the sweeping plains of Montana, with imposing mountains in the distance. But the plot of the film, based on a 1967 novel by Thomas Savage, isn’t exactly a Western. It’s a family drama about two brothers who share in the ranching business but couldn’t be more different, and what happens when one of them brings his new wife and her teen-age son to live on the ranch. “&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Power of the Dog” is nominated for twelve Academy Awards, the most of any film this year, including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Actor&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;. Campion talks with David Remnick about Benedict Cumberbatch’s starring performance; her experience working with Harvey Weinstein, and how #MeToo has changed the film industry; and why she’d really like to direct a comedy. Plus, Caetano Veloso, a living giant of Brazilian music, was recently profiled for &lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; by Jonathan Blitzer. The staff writer picks some key tracks from Veloso’s vast catalogue that illuminate his long career.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 03:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">dae88feb-9c44-4991-8629-3aa4fbf615a9</guid><enclosure length="29312000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour031522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1188481"/><category>arts</category><category>brazil</category><category>caetano_veloso</category><category>jane_campion</category><category>western_films</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour031522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1188481"/><media:description type="plain">Jane Campion on “The Power of the Dog”
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/03/Radio_Hour_Campion.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>30:32</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Jane Campion’s “The Power of the Dog” opens like a classic Western: cattle are herded across the sweeping plains of Montana, with imposing mountains in the distance. But the plot of the film, based on a 1967 novel by Thomas Savage, isn’t exactly a Western. It’s a family drama about two brothers who share in the ranching business but couldn’t be more different, and what happens when one of them brings his new wife and her teen-age son to live on the ranch. “</span><span>The Power of the Dog” is nominated for twelve Academy Awards, the most of any film this year, including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Actor</span><span>. Campion talks with David Remnick about Benedict Cumberbatch’s starring performance; her experience working with Harvey Weinstein, and how #MeToo has changed the film industry; and why she’d really like to direct a comedy. Plus, Caetano Veloso, a living giant of Brazilian music, was recently profiled for<span> </span><em><span>The New Yorker</span></em><span><span> </span>by Jonathan Blitzer. The staff writer picks some key tracks from Veloso’s vast catalogue that illuminate his long career.</span></span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Jane Campion on “The Power of the Dog”</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Jane Campion’s “The Power of the Dog” opens like a classic Western: cattle are herded across the sweeping plains of Montana, with imposing mountains in the distance. But the plot of the film, based on a 1967 novel by Thomas Savage, isn’t exactly a Western. It’s a family drama about two brothers who share in the ranching business but couldn’t be more different, and what happens when one of them brings his new wife and her teen-age son to live on the ranch. “</span><span>The Power of the Dog” is nominated for twelve Academy Awards, the most of any film this year, including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Actor</span><span>. Campion talks with David Remnick about Benedict Cumberbatch’s starring performance; her experience working with Harvey Weinstein, and how #MeToo has changed the film industry; and why she’d really like to direct a comedy. Plus, Caetano Veloso, a living giant of Brazilian music, was recently profiled for<span> </span><em><span>The New Yorker</span></em><span><span> </span>by Jonathan Blitzer. The staff writer picks some key tracks from Veloso’s vast catalogue that illuminate his long career.</span></span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Jane Campion’s “The Power of the Dog” opens like a classic Western: cattle are herded across the sweeping plains of Montana, with imposing mountains in the distance. But the plot of the film, based on a 1967 novel by Thomas Savage, isn’t exactly a Western. It’s a family drama about two brothers who share in the ranching business but couldn’t be more different, and what happens when one of them brings his new wife and her teen-age son to live on the ranch. “The Power of the Dog” is nominated for twelve Academy Awards, the most of any film this year, including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Actor. Campion talks with David Remnick about Benedict Cumberbatch’s starring performance; her experience working with Harvey Weinstein, and how #MeToo has changed the film industry; and why she’d really like to direct a comedy. Plus, Caetano Veloso, a living giant of Brazilian music, was recently profiled for The New Yorker by Jonathan Blitzer. The staff writer picks some key tracks from Veloso’s vast catalogue that illuminate his long career.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Stephen Kotkin: Don’t Blame the West for Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/stephen-kotkin-dont-blame-west-russias-invasion-ukraine-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;It’s impossible to understand the destruction and death that Vladimir Putin is unleashing in Ukraine without understanding his most basic conviction: that the breakup of the Soviet empire was a catastrophe from which Russia has yet to recover. Some experts, including &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/why-john-mearsheimer-blames-the-us-for-the-crisis-in-ukraine"&gt;&lt;span&gt;John Mearsheimer&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, have blamed &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;NATO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; expansion for the invasion of Ukraine, arguing that it has provoked Vladimir Putin to defend his sphere of influence. Stephen Kotkin, a professor of history and international affairs at Princeton University, and a research scholar at the Hoover Institution, respectfully disagrees. Putin’s aggression is “n&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;ot some kind of deviation from the historical pattern,” he tells David Remnick. Russia in the nineteenth century looked much as it does today, he says. “It had an autocrat. It had repression. It had militarism. It had suspicion of foreigners and the West.” Kotkin describes how and why the Putin regime has evolved toward despotism, and he speculates that the strategic blunders in invading Ukraine likely resulted from the biases of authoritarian rulers like Putin, and the lack of good information available to them. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Kotkin is the author of an authoritative biography of Joseph Stalin, two volumes of which have been published; a third is in the making. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:54:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ac28e292-188b-42d5-a1ec-eebd4b6a505d</guid><enclosure length="19168000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour031122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1188480"/><category>autocracy</category><category>history</category><category>ukraine</category><category>vladimir_putin</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour031122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1188480"/><media:description type="plain">Stephen Kotkin: Don’t Blame the West for Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/03/AP22057145369699.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>19:58</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>It’s impossible to understand the destruction and death that Vladimir Putin is unleashing in Ukraine without understanding his most basic conviction: that the breakup of the Soviet empire was a catastrophe from which Russia has yet to recover. Some experts, including </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/why-john-mearsheimer-blames-the-us-for-the-crisis-in-ukraine"><span>John Mearsheimer</span></a><span>, have blamed </span><span>NATO</span><span> expansion for the invasion of Ukraine, arguing that it has provoked Vladimir Putin to defend his sphere of influence. Stephen Kotkin, a professor of history and international affairs at Princeton University, and a research scholar at the Hoover Institution, respectfully disagrees. Putin’s aggression is “n</span><span>ot some kind of deviation from the historical pattern,” he tells David Remnick. Russia in the nineteenth century looked much as it does today, he says. “It had an autocrat. It had repression. It had militarism. It had suspicion of foreigners and the West.” Kotkin describes how and why the Putin regime has evolved toward despotism, and he speculates that the strategic blunders in invading Ukraine likely resulted from the biases of authoritarian rulers like Putin, and the lack of good information available to them. </span><span>Kotkin is the author of an authoritative biography of Joseph Stalin, two volumes of which have been published; a third is in the making. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Stephen Kotkin: Don’t Blame the West for Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>It’s impossible to understand the destruction and death that Vladimir Putin is unleashing in Ukraine without understanding his most basic conviction: that the breakup of the Soviet empire was a catastrophe from which Russia has yet to recover. Some experts, including </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/why-john-mearsheimer-blames-the-us-for-the-crisis-in-ukraine"><span>John Mearsheimer</span></a><span>, have blamed </span><span>NATO</span><span> expansion for the invasion of Ukraine, arguing that it has provoked Vladimir Putin to defend his sphere of influence. Stephen Kotkin, a professor of history and international affairs at Princeton University, and a research scholar at the Hoover Institution, respectfully disagrees. Putin’s aggression is “n</span><span>ot some kind of deviation from the historical pattern,” he tells David Remnick. Russia in the nineteenth century looked much as it does today, he says. “It had an autocrat. It had repression. It had militarism. It had suspicion of foreigners and the West.” Kotkin describes how and why the Putin regime has evolved toward despotism, and he speculates that the strategic blunders in invading Ukraine likely resulted from the biases of authoritarian rulers like Putin, and the lack of good information available to them. </span><span>Kotkin is the author of an authoritative biography of Joseph Stalin, two volumes of which have been published; a third is in the making. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>It’s impossible to understand the destruction and death that Vladimir Putin is unleashing in Ukraine without understanding his most basic conviction: that the breakup of the Soviet empire was a catastrophe from which Russia has yet to recover. Some experts, including John Mearsheimer, have blamed NATO expansion for the invasion of Ukraine, arguing that it has provoked Vladimir Putin to defend his sphere of influence. Stephen Kotkin, a professor of history and international affairs at Princeton University, and a research scholar at the Hoover Institution, respectfully disagrees. Putin’s aggression is “not some kind of deviation from the historical pattern,” he tells David Remnick. Russia in the nineteenth century looked much as it does today, he says. “It had an autocrat. It had repression. It had militarism. It had suspicion of foreigners and the West.” Kotkin describes how and why the Putin regime has evolved toward despotism, and he speculates that the strategic blunders in invading Ukraine likely resulted from the biases of authoritarian rulers like Putin, and the lack of good information available to them. Kotkin is the author of an authoritative biography of Joseph Stalin, two volumes of which have been published; a third is in the making.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Pauline Kael on “The Godfather”
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/pauline-kael-godfather-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;As &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; film critic from 1968 to around 1991, the influential Pauline Kael gave voice to her visceral reactions: she wrote as a moviegoer, not a cineaste. Fifty years ago, in the March 10, 1972, issue, she &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1972/03/18/alchemy-pauline-kael"&gt;&lt;span&gt;wrote&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; about a new film by the hot-shot young director Francis Ford Coppola. “If ever there was a great example of how the best popular movies come out of a merger of commerce and art,” Kael wrote, “ ‘The Godfather’ is it.” She noted that Coppola took Mario Puzo’s potboiler of a novel, and the familiar outline of the gangster melodrama, and imbued them with “a new tragic realism,” which reflected a darker view of Americanism in the Watergate era. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Edie Falco performs an excerpted version of Kael’s review. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span&gt;Some of Pauline Kael’s best work for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; is collected in “The Age of Movies,” published by the Library of America.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 03:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a8b3c4c-b79b-4af4-bf95-297d59f65039</guid><enclosure length="7168000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour030822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1186359"/><category>arts</category><category>edie_falco</category><category>godfather</category><category>pauline_kael</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour030822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1186359"/><media:description type="plain">Pauline Kael on “The Godfather”
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/03/godfather.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>7:28</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>As </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> film critic from 1968 to around 1991, the influential Pauline Kael gave voice to her visceral reactions: she wrote as a moviegoer, not a cineaste. Fifty years ago, in the March 10, 1972, issue, she </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1972/03/18/alchemy-pauline-kael"><span>wrote</span></a><span> about a new film by the hot-shot young director Francis Ford Coppola. “If ever there was a great example of how the best popular movies come out of a merger of commerce and art,” Kael wrote, “ ‘The Godfather’ is it.” She noted that Coppola took Mario Puzo’s potboiler of a novel, and the familiar outline of the gangster melodrama, and imbued them with “a new tragic realism,” which reflected a darker view of Americanism in the Watergate era. </span></p>
<p><span>Edie Falco performs an excerpted version of Kael’s review. </span></p>
<p><span>Some of Pauline Kael’s best work for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> is collected in “The Age of Movies,” published by the Library of America.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Pauline Kael on “The Godfather”</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>As </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> film critic from 1968 to around 1991, the influential Pauline Kael gave voice to her visceral reactions: she wrote as a moviegoer, not a cineaste. Fifty years ago, in the March 10, 1972, issue, she </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1972/03/18/alchemy-pauline-kael"><span>wrote</span></a><span> about a new film by the hot-shot young director Francis Ford Coppola. “If ever there was a great example of how the best popular movies come out of a merger of commerce and art,” Kael wrote, “ ‘The Godfather’ is it.” She noted that Coppola took Mario Puzo’s potboiler of a novel, and the familiar outline of the gangster melodrama, and imbued them with “a new tragic realism,” which reflected a darker view of Americanism in the Watergate era. </span></p>
<p><span>Edie Falco performs an excerpted version of Kael’s review. </span></p>
<p><span>Some of Pauline Kael’s best work for </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span> is collected in “The Age of Movies,” published by the Library of America.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>As The New Yorker’s film critic from 1968 to around 1991, the influential Pauline Kael gave voice to her visceral reactions: she wrote as a moviegoer, not a cineaste. Fifty years ago, in the March 10, 1972, issue, she wrote about a new film by the hot-shot young director Francis Ford Coppola. “If ever there was a great example of how the best popular movies come out of a merger of commerce and art,” Kael wrote, “ ‘The Godfather’ is it.” She noted that Coppola took Mario Puzo’s potboiler of a novel, and the familiar outline of the gangster melodrama, and imbued them with “a new tragic realism,” which reflected a darker view of Americanism in the Watergate era.  Edie Falco performs an excerpted version of Kael’s review.  Some of Pauline Kael’s best work for The New Yorker is collected in “The Age of Movies,” published by the Library of America.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Masha Gessen and Joshua Yaffa on the Escalation of Violence in Ukraine
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/masha-gessen-and-joshua-yaffa-escalation-violence-ukraine-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/joshua-yaffa"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Joshua Yaffa&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; is a Moscow correspondent for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;, but he has been travelling throughout the war zone in Ukraine for weeks, reporting on the Russian invasion. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/masha-gessen"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Masha Gessen&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, who has lived in and reported from Russia in the past, returned to Moscow to write about the Russian people’s response to the invasion. Yaffa and Gessen spoke with David Remnick on March 3rd about the week’s escalation of violence, and what Putin’s goal might be. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Plus, David Remnick speaks with &lt;span&gt;Igor Novikov, an Internet researcher and entrepreneur who served as an adviser to President Volodymyr Zelensky. Novikov explains how Zelensky’s background as an actor and a comedian has given him an advantage in the West’s “attention economy.” Ukraine “will only survive if people pay attention,” Novikov notes, and must “make sure people understand who the perpetrator and who the victim is in this situation.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2f9550e8-004a-42a4-a9fb-c8ff76ecae75</guid><enclosure length="40272000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour030422_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1186358"/><category>invasion</category><category>russia</category><category>ukraine</category><category>war</category><category>world_news</category><category>zelensky</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour030422_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1186358"/><media:description type="plain">Masha Gessen and Joshua Yaffa on the Escalation of Violence in Ukraine
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/03/TNY_final-8.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>41:57</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/joshua-yaffa"><span>Joshua Yaffa</span></a><span> is a Moscow correspondent for </span><em><span>The New Yorker</span></em><span>, but he has been travelling throughout the war zone in Ukraine for weeks, reporting on the Russian invasion. </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/masha-gessen"><span>Masha Gessen</span></a><span>, who has lived in and reported from Russia in the past, returned to Moscow to write about the Russian people’s response to the invasion. Yaffa and Gessen spoke with David Remnick on March 3rd about the week’s escalation of violence, and what Putin’s goal might be.</span></p>
<p><span>Plus, David Remnick speaks with<span> </span><span>Igor Novikov, an Internet researcher and entrepreneur who served as an adviser to President Volodymyr Zelensky. Novikov explains how Zelensky’s background as an actor and a comedian has given him an advantage in the West’s “attention economy.” Ukraine “will only survive if people pay attention,” Novikov notes, and must “make sure people understand who the perpetrator and who the victim is in this situation.”</span></span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Masha Gessen and Joshua Yaffa on the Escalation of Violence in Ukraine</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/joshua-yaffa"><span>Joshua Yaffa</span></a><span> is a Moscow correspondent for </span><em><span>The New Yorker</span></em><span>, but he has been travelling throughout the war zone in Ukraine for weeks, reporting on the Russian invasion. </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/masha-gessen"><span>Masha Gessen</span></a><span>, who has lived in and reported from Russia in the past, returned to Moscow to write about the Russian people’s response to the invasion. Yaffa and Gessen spoke with David Remnick on March 3rd about the week’s escalation of violence, and what Putin’s goal might be.</span></p>
<p><span>Plus, David Remnick speaks with<span> </span><span>Igor Novikov, an Internet researcher and entrepreneur who served as an adviser to President Volodymyr Zelensky. Novikov explains how Zelensky’s background as an actor and a comedian has given him an advantage in the West’s “attention economy.” Ukraine “will only survive if people pay attention,” Novikov notes, and must “make sure people understand who the perpetrator and who the victim is in this situation.”</span></span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Joshua Yaffa is a Moscow correspondent for The New Yorker, but he has been travelling throughout the war zone in Ukraine for weeks, reporting on the Russian invasion. Masha Gessen, who has lived in and reported from Russia in the past, returned to Moscow to write about the Russian people’s response to the invasion. Yaffa and Gessen spoke with David Remnick on March 3rd about the week’s escalation of violence, and what Putin’s goal might be. Plus, David Remnick speaks with Igor Novikov, an Internet researcher and entrepreneur who served as an adviser to President Volodymyr Zelensky. Novikov explains how Zelensky’s background as an actor and a comedian has given him an advantage in the West’s “attention economy.” Ukraine “will only survive if people pay attention,” Novikov notes, and must “make sure people understand who the perpetrator and who the victim is in this situation.”  </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Sheryl Lee Ralph on Confronting Hollywood
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/sheryl-lee-ralph-confronting-hollywood-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Sheryl Lee Ralph has been a staple of Black entertainment for decades. She played Deena Jones in the original Broadway production of “Dreamgirls,” and was in “Sister Act 2” alongside Lauryn Hill and Whoopi Goldberg. She’s currently starring in the new ABC sitcom “Abbott Elementary.” Her decades-long career gives her a unique perspective on how the industry has changed since she started—and how it hasn’t. “I think that, sometimes in order for institutions like Broadway to truly make room for others, you’ve got to break it down,” she tells &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; Vinson Cunningham. “Because you’ve got to help people see things differently, outside of their own vision. And, even if it’s 20/20, it’s not perfect.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2022 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2ea7b79e-318b-4dca-bed4-99e238997e8b</guid><enclosure length="25120000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour030122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1183443"/><category>arts</category><category>black_artists</category><category>film</category><category>hollywood</category><category>television</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour030122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1183443"/><media:description type="plain">Sheryl Lee Ralph on Confronting Hollywood
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/02/abbottelementary.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>26:10</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Sheryl Lee Ralph has been a staple of Black entertainment for decades. She played Deena Jones in the original Broadway production of “Dreamgirls,” and was in “Sister Act 2” alongside Lauryn Hill and Whoopi Goldberg. She’s currently starring in the new ABC sitcom “Abbott Elementary.” Her decades-long career gives her a unique perspective on how the industry has changed since she started—and how it hasn’t. “I think that, sometimes in order for institutions like Broadway to truly make room for others, you’ve got to break it down,” she tells </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> Vinson Cunningham. “Because you’ve got to help people see things differently, outside of their own vision. And, even if it’s 20/20, it’s not perfect.” </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Sheryl Lee Ralph on Confronting Hollywood</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Sheryl Lee Ralph has been a staple of Black entertainment for decades. She played Deena Jones in the original Broadway production of “Dreamgirls,” and was in “Sister Act 2” alongside Lauryn Hill and Whoopi Goldberg. She’s currently starring in the new ABC sitcom “Abbott Elementary.” Her decades-long career gives her a unique perspective on how the industry has changed since she started—and how it hasn’t. “I think that, sometimes in order for institutions like Broadway to truly make room for others, you’ve got to break it down,” she tells </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> Vinson Cunningham. “Because you’ve got to help people see things differently, outside of their own vision. And, even if it’s 20/20, it’s not perfect.” </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Sheryl Lee Ralph has been a staple of Black entertainment for decades. She played Deena Jones in the original Broadway production of “Dreamgirls,” and was in “Sister Act 2” alongside Lauryn Hill and Whoopi Goldberg. She’s currently starring in the new ABC sitcom “Abbott Elementary.” Her decades-long career gives her a unique perspective on how the industry has changed since she started—and how it hasn’t. “I think that, sometimes in order for institutions like Broadway to truly make room for others, you’ve got to break it down,” she tells The New Yorker’s Vinson Cunningham. “Because you’ve got to help people see things differently, outside of their own vision. And, even if it’s 20/20, it’s not perfect.”</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>How Black Creators Are Changing Hollywood
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/how-black-creators-are-changing-hollywood-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;In the past few years, it seems a floodgate has opened, releasing a deluge of tremendously successful media that centers the Black experience. “Get Out,” “Black Panther,” and HBO’s “Watchmen” are just some of the big-budget prestige projects that have drawn huge audiences and dominated the cultural conversation. The New Yorker Radio Hour looks at this moment in Black entertainment and investigates the industry forces behind it in a special episode, produced by Ngofeen Mputubwele. A film scholar explains the complicated history between studios and Black audiences.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;And Barry Jenkins, the director of “Moonlight,” tells David Remnick about the doors the Obama Presidency opened for Black creators in Hollywood. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42b670e6-163d-4cc9-9aab-ea7cce969f15</guid><enclosure length="27744000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour022522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1183440"/><category>arts</category><category>barry_jenkins</category><category>black_artists</category><category>business</category><category>film</category><category>hollywood</category><category>television</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour022522_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1183440"/><media:description type="plain">How Black Creators Are Changing Hollywood
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/02/TNY_black_film.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>28:54</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>In the past few years, it seems a floodgate has opened, releasing a deluge of tremendously successful media that centers the Black experience. “Get Out,” “Black Panther,” and HBO’s “Watchmen” are just some of the big-budget prestige projects that have drawn huge audiences and dominated the cultural conversation. The New Yorker Radio Hour looks at this moment in Black entertainment and investigates the industry forces behind it in a special episode, produced by Ngofeen Mputubwele. A film scholar explains the complicated history between studios and Black audiences.</span></p>
<p><span>And Barry Jenkins, the director of “Moonlight,” tells David Remnick about the doors the Obama Presidency opened for Black creators in Hollywood. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>How Black Creators Are Changing Hollywood</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>In the past few years, it seems a floodgate has opened, releasing a deluge of tremendously successful media that centers the Black experience. “Get Out,” “Black Panther,” and HBO’s “Watchmen” are just some of the big-budget prestige projects that have drawn huge audiences and dominated the cultural conversation. The New Yorker Radio Hour looks at this moment in Black entertainment and investigates the industry forces behind it in a special episode, produced by Ngofeen Mputubwele. A film scholar explains the complicated history between studios and Black audiences.</span></p>
<p><span>And Barry Jenkins, the director of “Moonlight,” tells David Remnick about the doors the Obama Presidency opened for Black creators in Hollywood. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>In the past few years, it seems a floodgate has opened, releasing a deluge of tremendously successful media that centers the Black experience. “Get Out,” “Black Panther,” and HBO’s “Watchmen” are just some of the big-budget prestige projects that have drawn huge audiences and dominated the cultural conversation. The New Yorker Radio Hour looks at this moment in Black entertainment and investigates the industry forces behind it in a special episode, produced by Ngofeen Mputubwele. A film scholar explains the complicated history between studios and Black audiences. And Barry Jenkins, the director of “Moonlight,” tells David Remnick about the doors the Obama Presidency opened for Black creators in Hollywood.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>How Should President Biden Respond to Putin’s War on Ukraine?
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/how-should-president-biden-respond-putins-war-ukraine/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Since last summer, Russian troops have been amassing on the Ukrainian border, and, in recent weeks, President Vladimir Putin warned that he intended a military takeover of Ukraine. This week,&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/putin-launches-his-invasion-of-ukraine" data-uri="545ca9ee66f6d665eb384e298ba26616"&gt;Russia began the war&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, with&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/a-sleepless-night-of-russian-air-strikes-in-ukraine" data-uri="2ee5560a6e44177960fc304b14890e00"&gt;widespread attacks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, including in the capital, Kyiv, aimed at&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-crushing-loss-of-hope-in-ukraine" data-uri="f38f3170e29e78d681689a0151010389"&gt;crippling the Ukrainian military&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;. The Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, has called on civilians to enlist in the military to fight the invaders. The U.S. and&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em class="small"&gt;nato&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;are levying heavy sanctions against the Russians, but there are disagreements within the U.S. and among western allies about exactly how to proceed. Susan B. Glasser, a&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Yorker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;staff writer, joins Dorothy Wickenden to discuss the war, and the choices faced by the Biden administration and&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em class="small"&gt;nato&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cbd723bf-f1f1-4742-ac51-58189a2ba0f8</guid><enclosure length="25600000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour022422_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1183061"/><category>nato</category><category>politics</category><category>ukraine</category><category>vladimir_putin</category><category>war</category><category>world_news</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour022422_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1183061"/><media:description type="plain">How Should President Biden Respond to Putin’s War on Ukraine?
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/02/Politics-Biden-Ukraine.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>26:40</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Since last summer, Russian troops have been amassing on the Ukrainian border, and, in recent weeks, President Vladimir Putin warned that he intended a military takeover of Ukraine. This week, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/putin-launches-his-invasion-of-ukraine" data-uri="545ca9ee66f6d665eb384e298ba26616">Russia began the war</a><span>, with<span> </span></span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/a-sleepless-night-of-russian-air-strikes-in-ukraine" data-uri="2ee5560a6e44177960fc304b14890e00">widespread attacks</a><span>, including in the capital, Kyiv, aimed at<span> </span></span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-crushing-loss-of-hope-in-ukraine" data-uri="f38f3170e29e78d681689a0151010389">crippling the Ukrainian military</a><span>. The Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, has called on civilians to enlist in the military to fight the invaders. The U.S. and<span> </span></span><em>nato</em><span><span> </span>are levying heavy sanctions against the Russians, but there are disagreements within the U.S. and among western allies about exactly how to proceed. Susan B. Glasser, a<span> </span></span><em>New Yorker</em><span><span> </span>staff writer, joins Dorothy Wickenden to discuss the war, and the choices faced by the Biden administration and<span> </span></span><em>nato</em><span>.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>How Should President Biden Respond to Putin’s War on Ukraine?</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Since last summer, Russian troops have been amassing on the Ukrainian border, and, in recent weeks, President Vladimir Putin warned that he intended a military takeover of Ukraine. This week, </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/putin-launches-his-invasion-of-ukraine" data-uri="545ca9ee66f6d665eb384e298ba26616">Russia began the war</a><span>, with<span> </span></span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/a-sleepless-night-of-russian-air-strikes-in-ukraine" data-uri="2ee5560a6e44177960fc304b14890e00">widespread attacks</a><span>, including in the capital, Kyiv, aimed at<span> </span></span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-crushing-loss-of-hope-in-ukraine" data-uri="f38f3170e29e78d681689a0151010389">crippling the Ukrainian military</a><span>. The Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, has called on civilians to enlist in the military to fight the invaders. The U.S. and<span> </span></span><em>nato</em><span><span> </span>are levying heavy sanctions against the Russians, but there are disagreements within the U.S. and among western allies about exactly how to proceed. Susan B. Glasser, a<span> </span></span><em>New Yorker</em><span><span> </span>staff writer, joins Dorothy Wickenden to discuss the war, and the choices faced by the Biden administration and<span> </span></span><em>nato</em><span>.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Since last summer, Russian troops have been amassing on the Ukrainian border, and, in recent weeks, President Vladimir Putin warned that he intended a military takeover of Ukraine. This week, Russia began the war, with widespread attacks, including in the capital, Kyiv, aimed at crippling the Ukrainian military. The Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, has called on civilians to enlist in the military to fight the invaders. The U.S. and nato are levying heavy sanctions against the Russians, but there are disagreements within the U.S. and among western allies about exactly how to proceed. Susan B. Glasser, a New Yorker staff writer, joins Dorothy Wickenden to discuss the war, and the choices faced by the Biden administration and nato.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Peter Dinklage on “Cyrano”
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/peter-dinklage-cyrano/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Joe Wright’s film “Cyrano,” nominated for an Academy Award for Best Costume Design, was based on Erica Schmidt’s 2018 stage musical of the same name. Peter Dinklage starred in both, as the unattractive but lovestruck swashbuckler of the 1897 play “Cyrano de Bergerac.” Dinklage spoke with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Michael Schulman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; in 2019, and said that Cyrano’s predicament is not really about his famously giant schnoz; it is about “everyone’s capacity to not feel worthy of love.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Dinklage also spoke about the ending of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;“Game of Thrones,” which had taken place a few months earlier. Fans were still freaking out &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;about Daenerys’s turn to brutality at the series’ end, and Dinklage had little sympathy. “Monsters are created. We vote them into office. . . . Maybe [fans] should have waited for the series finale before you get that tattoo, or name your golden retriever Daenerys. I can’t help you.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment originally aired December 20, 2019. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 03:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a60395d3-c6a9-43bd-98df-9f7a6374a9f6</guid><enclosure length="16048000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour022222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1180804"/><category>arts</category><category>cyrano_de_bergerac</category><category>oscars</category><category>peter_dinklage</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour022222_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1180804"/><media:description type="plain">Peter Dinklage on “Cyrano”
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2019/12/RadioHour-PeterDinklage-4x3.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>16:43</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Joe Wright’s film “Cyrano,” nominated for an Academy Award for Best Costume Design, was based on Erica Schmidt’s 2018 stage musical of the same name. Peter Dinklage starred in both, as the unattractive but lovestruck swashbuckler of the 1897 play “Cyrano de Bergerac.” Dinklage spoke with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"><span>Michael Schulman</span></a><span> in 2019, and said that Cyrano’s predicament is not really about his famously giant schnoz; it is about “everyone’s capacity to not feel worthy of love.” </span><span>Dinklage also spoke about the ending of </span><span>“Game of Thrones,” which had taken place a few months earlier. Fans were still freaking out </span><span>about Daenerys’s turn to brutality at the series’ end, and Dinklage had little sympathy. “Monsters are created. We vote them into office. . . . Maybe [fans] should have waited for the series finale before you get that tattoo, or name your golden retriever Daenerys. I can’t help you.”</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired December 20, 2019. </span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Peter Dinklage on “Cyrano”</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Joe Wright’s film “Cyrano,” nominated for an Academy Award for Best Costume Design, was based on Erica Schmidt’s 2018 stage musical of the same name. Peter Dinklage starred in both, as the unattractive but lovestruck swashbuckler of the 1897 play “Cyrano de Bergerac.” Dinklage spoke with </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/michael-schulman"><span>Michael Schulman</span></a><span> in 2019, and said that Cyrano’s predicament is not really about his famously giant schnoz; it is about “everyone’s capacity to not feel worthy of love.” </span><span>Dinklage also spoke about the ending of </span><span>“Game of Thrones,” which had taken place a few months earlier. Fans were still freaking out </span><span>about Daenerys’s turn to brutality at the series’ end, and Dinklage had little sympathy. “Monsters are created. We vote them into office. . . . Maybe [fans] should have waited for the series finale before you get that tattoo, or name your golden retriever Daenerys. I can’t help you.”</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired December 20, 2019. </span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Joe Wright’s film “Cyrano,” nominated for an Academy Award for Best Costume Design, was based on Erica Schmidt’s 2018 stage musical of the same name. Peter Dinklage starred in both, as the unattractive but lovestruck swashbuckler of the 1897 play “Cyrano de Bergerac.” Dinklage spoke with Michael Schulman in 2019, and said that Cyrano’s predicament is not really about his famously giant schnoz; it is about “everyone’s capacity to not feel worthy of love.” Dinklage also spoke about the ending of “Game of Thrones,” which had taken place a few months earlier. Fans were still freaking out about Daenerys’s turn to brutality at the series’ end, and Dinklage had little sympathy. “Monsters are created. We vote them into office. . . . Maybe [fans] should have waited for the series finale before you get that tattoo, or name your golden retriever Daenerys. I can’t help you.”   This segment originally aired December 20, 2019.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Nicholas Britell on the Art of the Film Score
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/nicholas-britell-art-film-score/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Nicholas Britell has emerged as one of the most in-demand film composers working today, creating original music for projects that hew to no style or model. He wrote the infuriatingly catchy theme of HBO’s “Succession”; he is nominated for an Academy Award for the score of Adam McKay’s manic apocalypse comedy “Don’t Look Up”; he was previously nominated for his score for Barry Jenkins’s “Moonlight.” In 2017, Britell spoke with the&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt; New Yorker&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; editor Henry Finder on the occasion of the release of “Battle of the Sexes,” about the 1973 tennis match between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;This segment originally aired September 22, 2017. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d9913cd1-687b-4fc9-b6aa-f315a817a14b</guid><enclosure length="17392000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour021822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1180803"/><category>arts</category><category>composer</category><category>film_scores</category><category>music</category><category>nicholas_britell</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour021822_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1180803"/><media:description type="plain">Nicholas Britell on the Art of the Film Score
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/1/AP_17037730909975.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>18:07</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Nicholas Britell has emerged as one of the most in-demand film composers working today, creating original music for projects that hew to no style or model. He wrote the infuriatingly catchy theme of HBO’s “Succession”; he is nominated for an Academy Award for the score of Adam McKay’s manic apocalypse comedy “Don’t Look Up”; he was previously nominated for his score for Barry Jenkins’s “Moonlight.” In 2017, Britell spoke with the</span><i><span> New Yorker</span></i><span> editor Henry Finder on the occasion of the release of “Battle of the Sexes,” about the 1973 tennis match between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs. </span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired September 22, 2017. </span></i></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Nicholas Britell on the Art of the Film Score</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Nicholas Britell has emerged as one of the most in-demand film composers working today, creating original music for projects that hew to no style or model. He wrote the infuriatingly catchy theme of HBO’s “Succession”; he is nominated for an Academy Award for the score of Adam McKay’s manic apocalypse comedy “Don’t Look Up”; he was previously nominated for his score for Barry Jenkins’s “Moonlight.” In 2017, Britell spoke with the</span><i><span> New Yorker</span></i><span> editor Henry Finder on the occasion of the release of “Battle of the Sexes,” about the 1973 tennis match between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs. </span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><i><span>This segment originally aired September 22, 2017. </span></i></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Nicholas Britell has emerged as one of the most in-demand film composers working today, creating original music for projects that hew to no style or model. He wrote the infuriatingly catchy theme of HBO’s “Succession”; he is nominated for an Academy Award for the score of Adam McKay’s manic apocalypse comedy “Don’t Look Up”; he was previously nominated for his score for Barry Jenkins’s “Moonlight.” In 2017, Britell spoke with the New Yorker editor Henry Finder on the occasion of the release of “Battle of the Sexes,” about the 1973 tennis match between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs.    This segment originally aired September 22, 2017.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the Path Forward for the Left
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-path-forward-left/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is one of the most prominent progressives in Washington. Her political ascent began with her shocking 2018 defeat of a longtime incumbent in a New York district that includes parts of Queens and the Bronx. She is a strong advocate of the Green New Deal and Medicare for All. With her party’s razor-thin majorities now in peril, many of her priorities seem out of reach. Can the agenda she was elected to advance survive? &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Ocasio-Cortez reflects on her time in Washington with David Remnick, painting a dysfunctional portrait of Congress. “Honestly, it is a shit show,” she says. “It’s scandalizing, every single day. What is surprising to me is how it never stops being scandalizing.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;This conversation is part of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The New Yorker’s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt; first &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://newyorker.com/interviews-issue-2022"&gt;&lt;span&gt;digital-only issue&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, a special collection of New Yorker Interviews.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b08087ff-7274-4c77-ae41-0b75a624bb07</guid><enclosure length="46464000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour021422_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1178795"/><category>alexandria_ocasio_cortez</category><category>national_news</category><category>politics</category><category>progressive_policies</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour021422_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1178795"/><media:description type="plain">Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the Path Forward for the Left
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/l/80/2022/02/AP19207519570308.jpg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>48:24</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is one of the most prominent progressives in Washington. Her political ascent began with her shocking 2018 defeat of a longtime incumbent in a New York district that includes parts of Queens and the Bronx. She is a strong advocate of the Green New Deal and Medicare for All. With her party’s razor-thin majorities now in peril, many of her priorities seem out of reach. Can the agenda she was elected to advance survive? </span> </p>
<p><span>Ocasio-Cortez reflects on her time in Washington with David Remnick, painting a dysfunctional portrait of Congress. “Honestly, it is a shit show,” she says. “It’s scandalizing, every single day. What is surprising to me is how it never stops being scandalizing.”</span></p>
<p><span>This conversation is part of </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> first </span><a href="https://newyorker.com/interviews-issue-2022"><span>digital-only issue</span></a><span>, a special collection of New Yorker Interviews.</span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the Path Forward for the Left</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is one of the most prominent progressives in Washington. Her political ascent began with her shocking 2018 defeat of a longtime incumbent in a New York district that includes parts of Queens and the Bronx. She is a strong advocate of the Green New Deal and Medicare for All. With her party’s razor-thin majorities now in peril, many of her priorities seem out of reach. Can the agenda she was elected to advance survive? </span> </p>
<p><span>Ocasio-Cortez reflects on her time in Washington with David Remnick, painting a dysfunctional portrait of Congress. “Honestly, it is a shit show,” she says. “It’s scandalizing, every single day. What is surprising to me is how it never stops being scandalizing.”</span></p>
<p><span>This conversation is part of </span><i><span>The New Yorker’s</span></i><span> first </span><a href="https://newyorker.com/interviews-issue-2022"><span>digital-only issue</span></a><span>, a special collection of New Yorker Interviews.</span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is one of the most prominent progressives in Washington. Her political ascent began with her shocking 2018 defeat of a longtime incumbent in a New York district that includes parts of Queens and the Bronx. She is a strong advocate of the Green New Deal and Medicare for All. With her party’s razor-thin majorities now in peril, many of her priorities seem out of reach. Can the agenda she was elected to advance survive?  Ocasio-Cortez reflects on her time in Washington with David Remnick, painting a dysfunctional portrait of Congress. “Honestly, it is a shit show,” she says. “It’s scandalizing, every single day. What is surprising to me is how it never stops being scandalizing.” This conversation is part of The New Yorker’s first digital-only issue, a special collection of New Yorker Interviews.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item><item><title>On Cancel Culture and the State of Free Speech
</title><link>http://www.wnycstudios.org/story/cancel-culture-and-state-free-speech-pod/</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Every few weeks, it seems, another example of so-called cancel culture is dominating the headlines and trending on social-media platforms. The refrain “you can’t say anything these days” has become a slogan of cultural politics, particularly on the right. And yet there’s a wide gulf of opinion on what the term “cancelling” means—and whether the phenomenon even exists. In this special episode, we examine the issue with Representative &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/tag/alexandria-ocasio-cortez"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, the YouTube video creator Lindsay Ellis, the comedy historian Kliph Nesteroff, and the writers Jay Caspian Kang and William Deresiewicz. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">be9eca5d-e054-4c7b-ade0-6c43245ad0ea</guid><enclosure length="47392000" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour021122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1178740"/><category>academia</category><category>cancel_culture</category><category>comedy</category><category>free_speech</category><category>politics</category><category>protests</category><category>social_media</category><category>youtube</category><media:content type="audio/mpeg" url="https://chrt.fm/track/7E7E1F/pdst.fm/e/dts.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/waaa.wnyc.org/tnyradiohour/tnyradiohour021122_podcast.mp3?awCollectionId=537711&amp;awEpisodeId=1178740"/><media:description type="plain">On Cancel Culture and the State of Free Speech
</media:description><media:thumbnail height="130" url="https://media.wnyc.org/i/130/130/c/80/2022/02/Radio_Hour_Free_Speech.jpeg" width="130"/><itunes:duration>49:22</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://media.wnyc.org/i/1400/1400/l/80/2019/01/The_New_Yorker_Radio_Hour_Logo_3000x3000_final_nb.png"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Every few weeks, it seems, another example of so-called cancel culture is dominating the headlines and trending on social-media platforms. The refrain “you can’t say anything these days” has become a slogan of cultural politics, particularly on the right. And yet there’s a wide gulf of opinion on what the term “cancelling” means—and whether the phenomenon even exists. In this special episode, we examine the issue with Representative </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/tag/alexandria-ocasio-cortez"><span>Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez</span></a><span>, the YouTube video creator Lindsay Ellis, the comedy historian Kliph Nesteroff, and the writers Jay Caspian Kang and William Deresiewicz. </span></p>]]></content:encoded><itunes:title>On Cancel Culture and the State of Free Speech</itunes:title><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><span>Every few weeks, it seems, another example of so-called cancel culture is dominating the headlines and trending on social-media platforms. The refrain “you can’t say anything these days” has become a slogan of cultural politics, particularly on the right. And yet there’s a wide gulf of opinion on what the term “cancelling” means—and whether the phenomenon even exists. In this special episode, we examine the issue with Representative </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/tag/alexandria-ocasio-cortez"><span>Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez</span></a><span>, the YouTube video creator Lindsay Ellis, the comedy historian Kliph Nesteroff, and the writers Jay Caspian Kang and William Deresiewicz. </span></p>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wnycdigital@gmail.com (WNYC Studios and The New Yorker)</dc:creator><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Every few weeks, it seems, another example of so-called cancel culture is dominating the headlines and trending on social-media platforms. The refrain “you can’t say anything these days” has become a slogan of cultural politics, particularly on the right. And yet there’s a wide gulf of opinion on what the term “cancelling” means—and whether the phenomenon even exists. In this special episode, we examine the issue with Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the YouTube video creator Lindsay Ellis, the comedy historian Kliph Nesteroff, and the writers Jay Caspian Kang and William Deresiewicz.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>WNYC Studios and The New Yorker</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>David,Remnick,New,Yorker,storytelling,wnyc</itunes:keywords></item></channel></rss>