https://www.spreaker.com/show/podslawA podcast by a Scots lawyer bringing updates on recent judicial decisions. ~~ Facebook: www.facebook.com/podslawjk Twitter: @podslaw iTunes: http://ow.ly/o2Y3h RSS feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/podslaw Website: http://www.terrafirmachambers.com/our-advocates.html?advocate_id=87 E-mail: julius.komorowski@terrafirmachambers.com ~~ Incidental music was created by lucasgonze: http://ow.ly/o4f1VenNewsCopyright Julius Komorowskihttps://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/a73c895effff314b124565c1911903fd.jpghttps://www.spreaker.com/show/podslawSat, 06 Feb 2016 11:31:59 +0000Julius KomorowskiA podcast by a Scots lawyer discussing recent judicial decisions.Pod's law, hosted by Julius Komorowski (tinyurl.com/JuliusKo), discusses important judicial decisions that have recently been decided. Julius is a member of the Faculty of Advocates who regularly appears in the Court of Session. The podcast covers cases from Scotland and the rest of the United Kingdom.noepisodicJulius Komorowskijulius.komorowski@advocates.org.ukA podcast hosted by Julius Komorowski, a Scottish Advocate bringing updates on recent judicial decisions. ~~ Facebook: www.facebook.com/podslawjk Twitter: @podslaw iTunes: www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes RSS feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/podslaw Julius' Website: tinyurl.com/JuliusKo E-mail: julius.komorowski@terrafirmachambers.comNoLaw,Laws,Courts,Court,Judiciary,Appeal,Legislation,Judicial,Judge,Case,Cases,legal,echrjulius.komorowski@advocates.org.ukJulius Komorowskihttps://www.spreaker.com/user/5745794/gardner-on-hung-parliaments
This is a special edition of Pod's law for the General Election, concerning the law and conventions concerning who governs the country in the event of a hung parliament.

If you wish to read more about what we discuss during the show, you might like to look at the following links:

Carl Gardner's Blog: "Ed can enter No. 10 without Nicola’s keys
":
www.headoflegal.com/2015/04/19/ed-can-enter-no-10-without-nicolas-keys/

The Guardian, "Alex Salmond threatens to call election after Scottish parliament rejects SNP's budget":
www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/jan/28/scotland-snp

Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/contents/enacted

House of Commons Library, "Hung Parliaments":
http://tinyurl.com/HCL-hung-parliament

Election Forecast website:
www.electionforecast.co.uk

=ABOUT CARL GARDNER=

My guest is Carl Gardner, previously a practicing barrister and government lawyer, presently lecturer at the Open University and legal blogger at www.headoflegal.com.

Carl tweets at www.twitter.com/carlgardner

=ABOUT JULIUS KOMOROWSKI=

I am a practising member of the Scottish bar (an Advocate). I am a member of Terra Firma Chambers. You can find out details about me here: www.tinyurl.com/JuliusKo

You can follow me on twitter here: www.twitter.com/podslaw

=ABOUT THE PODCAST=

You can find previous episodes of the podcast online at:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw

You can also find episodes at iTunes at:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes

If you subscribe to iTunes, then you will automatically have new episodes downloaded to your phone or computer once they become available.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/6019730Mon, 04 May 2015 10:30:04 +0000Julius Komorowski=ABOUT THIS EPISODE= This is a special edition of Pod's law for the General Election, concerning the law and conventions concerning who governs the country in the event of a hung parliament. If you wish to read more about what we discuss during the...
This is a special edition of Pod's law for the General Election, concerning the law and conventions concerning who governs the country in the event of a hung parliament.

If you wish to read more about what we discuss during the show, you might like to look at the following links:

Carl Gardner's Blog: "Ed can enter No. 10 without Nicola’s keys
":
www.headoflegal.com/2015/04/19/ed-can-enter-no-10-without-nicolas-keys/

The Guardian, "Alex Salmond threatens to call election after Scottish parliament rejects SNP's budget":
www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/jan/28/scotland-snp

Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/contents/enacted

House of Commons Library, "Hung Parliaments":
http://tinyurl.com/HCL-hung-parliament

Election Forecast website:
www.electionforecast.co.uk

=ABOUT CARL GARDNER=

My guest is Carl Gardner, previously a practicing barrister and government lawyer, presently lecturer at the Open University and legal blogger at www.headoflegal.com.

Carl tweets at www.twitter.com/carlgardner

=ABOUT JULIUS KOMOROWSKI=

I am a practising member of the Scottish bar (an Advocate). I am a member of Terra Firma Chambers. You can find out details about me here: www.tinyurl.com/JuliusKo

You can follow me on twitter here: www.twitter.com/podslaw

=ABOUT THE PODCAST=

You can find previous episodes of the podcast online at:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw

You can also find episodes at iTunes at:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes

If you subscribe to iTunes, then you will automatically have new episodes downloaded to your phone or computer once they become available.]]>1753cameron,election,constitution,parliament,milibandcleanfullJulius Komorowski=ABOUT THIS EPISODE= This is a special edition of Pod's law for the General Election, concerning the law and conventions concerning who governs the country in the event of a hung parliament. If you wish to read more about what we discuss during the show, you might like to look at the following links: Carl Gardner's Blog: "Ed can enter No. 10 without Nicola’s keys ": www.headoflegal.com/2015/04/19/ed-can-enter-no-10-without-nicolas-keys/ The Guardian, "Alex Salmond threatens to call election after Scottish parliament rejects SNP's budget": www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/jan/28/scotland-snp Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/contents/enacted House of Commons Library, "Hung Parliaments": http://tinyurl.com/HCL-hung-parliament Election Forecast website: www.electionforecast.co.uk =ABOUT CARL GARDNER= My guest is Carl Gardner, previously a practicing barrister and government lawyer, presently lecturer at the Open University and legal blogger at www.headoflegal.com. Carl tweets at www.twitter.com/carlgardner =ABOUT JULIUS KOMOROWSKI= I am a practising member of the Scottish bar (an Advocate). I am a member of Terra Firma Chambers. You can find out details about me here: www.tinyurl.com/JuliusKo You can follow me on twitter here: www.twitter.com/podslaw =ABOUT THE PODCAST= You can find previous episodes of the podcast online at: www.tinyurl.com/podslaw You can also find episodes at iTunes at: www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes If you subscribe to iTunes, then you will automatically have new episodes downloaded to your phone or computer once they become available.Nojulius.komorowski@advocates.org.uk (Julius Komorowski)https://www.spreaker.com/user/5745794/hooper-on-cmp-national-security
You can view her profile here: www.tinyurl.com/H-J-Hooper

We discuss the following recent cases:

= CF -v- Ministry of Defence =

High Court of England & Wales: Queen's Bench Division (Irwin J)

14 October 2014

[2014] EWHC 3171 (QB)

An applicant alleged that the UK government had colluded in torture and other ill-treatment that he had suffered abroad. He sought to recover damages from the government in a civil action. It had already been decided that it was necessary to exclude the applicant from parts of the civil trial to protect national security. The question was what level of detail of the government's defence must be disclosed to the applicant in order for him to have a fair trial of his civil action.

www.tinyurl.com/CF-v-MOD-CMP

= VB & ors -v- Westminster Magistrates' Court, Govt. of Rwanda & Crown Prosecution Service =

Supreme Court (Lords Neuburger, Mance, Reed, Hughes & Toulson)

5 November 2014

[2014] UKSC 59

The Government of Rwanda sought extradition of certain persons in the United Kingdom. Those persons claimed that their extradition would expose them to serious harm. The witnessess necessary to establish this could not be led, they said, if the witnessess thought the Government of Rwanda would become aware of the evidence they had given. The question was whether the court had any power to employ special measures to avoid this.

www.tinyurl.com/VB-v-Rwanda

= Carlile -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department =

Supreme Court (Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lords Kerr, Clarke & Sumption)

12 November 2014

[2014] UKSC 60

A group of MPs and members of the House of Lords wished to host a meeting with a prominent Iranian opposition politician. The Home Office denied a visa to that politician. The Home Secretary said granting a visa would damage relations with Iran and might expose the British Embassy to retaliation from the Iranian public. In assessing whether the interference with the freedom of expression of the politician and parliamentarians was proportionate, what degree of respect should be accorded to the views of the Home Secretary? How intrusive should review be by the court?

www.tinyurl.com/Carlile-v-SSHD

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced. You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/5283776Sun, 30 Nov 2014 21:06:58 +0000Julius KomorowskiThis episode features an interview with Hayley Hooper, of Homerton College, University of Cambridge on Closed Material Procedure and National Security. You can view her profile here: www.tinyurl.com/H-J-Hooper We discuss the following recent cases:...
You can view her profile here: www.tinyurl.com/H-J-Hooper

We discuss the following recent cases:

= CF -v- Ministry of Defence =

High Court of England & Wales: Queen's Bench Division (Irwin J)

14 October 2014

[2014] EWHC 3171 (QB)

An applicant alleged that the UK government had colluded in torture and other ill-treatment that he had suffered abroad. He sought to recover damages from the government in a civil action. It had already been decided that it was necessary to exclude the applicant from parts of the civil trial to protect national security. The question was what level of detail of the government's defence must be disclosed to the applicant in order for him to have a fair trial of his civil action.

www.tinyurl.com/CF-v-MOD-CMP

= VB & ors -v- Westminster Magistrates' Court, Govt. of Rwanda & Crown Prosecution Service =

Supreme Court (Lords Neuburger, Mance, Reed, Hughes & Toulson)

5 November 2014

[2014] UKSC 59

The Government of Rwanda sought extradition of certain persons in the United Kingdom. Those persons claimed that their extradition would expose them to serious harm. The witnessess necessary to establish this could not be led, they said, if the witnessess thought the Government of Rwanda would become aware of the evidence they had given. The question was whether the court had any power to employ special measures to avoid this.

www.tinyurl.com/VB-v-Rwanda

= Carlile -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department =

Supreme Court (Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lords Kerr, Clarke & Sumption)

12 November 2014

[2014] UKSC 60

A group of MPs and members of the House of Lords wished to host a meeting with a prominent Iranian opposition politician. The Home Office denied a visa to that politician. The Home Secretary said granting a visa would damage relations with Iran and might expose the British Embassy to retaliation from the Iranian public. In assessing whether the interference with the freedom of expression of the politician and parliamentarians was proportionate, what degree of respect should be accorded to the views of the Home Secretary? How intrusive should review be by the court?

www.tinyurl.com/Carlile-v-SSHD

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced. You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>1662court,law,judgmentcleanfullJulius KomorowskiThis episode features an interview with Hayley Hooper, of Homerton College, University of Cambridge on Closed Material Procedure and National Security. You can view her profile here: www.tinyurl.com/H-J-Hooper We discuss the following recent cases: = CF -v- Ministry of Defence = High Court of England & Wales: Queen's Bench Division (Irwin J) 14 October 2014 [2014] EWHC 3171 (QB) An applicant alleged that the UK government had colluded in torture and other ill-treatment that he had suffered abroad. He sought to recover damages from the government in a civil action. It had already been decided that it was necessary to exclude the applicant from parts of the civil trial to protect national security. The question was what level of detail of the government's defence must be disclosed to the applicant in order for him to have a fair trial of his civil action. www.tinyurl.com/CF-v-MOD-CMP = VB & ors -v- Westminster Magistrates' Court, Govt. of Rwanda & Crown Prosecution Service = Supreme Court (Lords Neuburger, Mance, Reed, Hughes & Toulson) 5 November 2014 [2014] UKSC 59 The Government of Rwanda sought extradition of certain persons in the United Kingdom. Those persons claimed that their extradition would expose them to serious harm. The witnessess necessary to establish this could not be led, they said, if the witnessess thought the Government of Rwanda would become aware of the evidence they had given. The question was whether the court had any power to employ special measures to avoid this. www.tinyurl.com/VB-v-Rwanda = Carlile -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department = Supreme Court (Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lords Kerr, Clarke & Sumption) 12 November 2014 [2014] UKSC 60 A group of MPs and members of the House of Lords wished to host a meeting with a prominent Iranian opposition politician. The Home Office denied a visa to that politician. The Home Secretary said granting a visa would damage relations with Iran and might expose the British Embassy to retaliation from the Iranian public. In assessing whether the interference with the freedom of expression of the politician and parliamentarians was proportionate, what degree of respect should be accorded to the views of the Home Secretary? How intrusive should review be by the court? www.tinyurl.com/Carlile-v-SSHD == About the series == You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced. You can also subscribe through iTunes: www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunesNojulius.komorowski@advocates.org.uk (Julius Komorowski)https://www.spreaker.com/user/5745794/hay-on-employment-law
www.tinyurl.com/David-JP-Hay

You can also read the judgment in his recent victory in the EAT here: www.tinyurl.com/Swissport-v-Taylor

We discuss the following case:

= General Dynamics Information Technology Ltd -v- Carranza =

Employment Appeal Tribunal

10 October 2014

[2014] UKEAT 0107

Whether an Employment Tribunal erred in finding that, where a sick and disabled person was subject to disciplinary proceedings due to his absences, a reasonable adjustment would have been to disregard a final written warning for previous absences.

www.tinyurl.com/General-Dynamics-v-Carranza

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced, and like the show on Facebook:

www.facebook.com/podslawjk

You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/5160316Sun, 02 Nov 2014 22:36:17 +0000Julius KomorowskiThe sixth show in the new series is with David Hay, Advocate, of Westwater Advocates. You can find out about him here: www.tinyurl.com/David-JP-Hay You can also read the judgment in his recent victory in the EAT here:...
www.tinyurl.com/David-JP-Hay

You can also read the judgment in his recent victory in the EAT here: www.tinyurl.com/Swissport-v-Taylor

We discuss the following case:

= General Dynamics Information Technology Ltd -v- Carranza =

Employment Appeal Tribunal

10 October 2014

[2014] UKEAT 0107

Whether an Employment Tribunal erred in finding that, where a sick and disabled person was subject to disciplinary proceedings due to his absences, a reasonable adjustment would have been to disregard a final written warning for previous absences.

www.tinyurl.com/General-Dynamics-v-Carranza

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced, and like the show on Facebook:

www.facebook.com/podslawjk

You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>1712discrimination,law,equality,employment,disabilitycleanfullJulius KomorowskiThe sixth show in the new series is with David Hay, Advocate, of Westwater Advocates. You can find out about him here: www.tinyurl.com/David-JP-Hay You can also read the judgment in his recent victory in the EAT here: www.tinyurl.com/Swissport-v-Taylor We discuss the following case: = General Dynamics Information Technology Ltd -v- Carranza = Employment Appeal Tribunal 10 October 2014 [2014] UKEAT 0107 Whether an Employment Tribunal erred in finding that, where a sick and disabled person was subject to disciplinary proceedings due to his absences, a reasonable adjustment would have been to disregard a final written warning for previous absences. www.tinyurl.com/General-Dynamics-v-Carranza == About the series == You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced, and like the show on Facebook: www.facebook.com/podslawjk You can also subscribe through iTunes: www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunesNojulius.komorowski@advocates.org.uk (Julius Komorowski)https://www.spreaker.com/user/5745794/mullan-on-criminal-evidence
www.mullanadvocate.co.uk

We discuss the following case:

= Beurskens v HM Advocate =

Appeal Court, High Court of Justiciary

26 February 2013

[2014] HJAC 99

Were signed statements taken by police officers on the instructions of the procurator fiscal "precognitions" and therefore inadmissable as evidence?

Judgment: http://tinyurl.com/Beurskens-v-HMA

Owen's blog: http://www.mullanadvocate.co.uk/beurskens-v-hma-precognition-or-statement/

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced, and like the show on Facebook:

www.facebook.com/podslawjk

You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/5044895Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:40:47 +0000Julius KomorowskiThe fifth show in our series is with Owen Mullan, Advocate, of Mackinnon Advocates. You can find out about him here: www.mullanadvocate.co.uk We discuss the following case: = Beurskens v HM Advocate = Appeal Court, High Court of Justiciary 26...
www.mullanadvocate.co.uk

We discuss the following case:

= Beurskens v HM Advocate =

Appeal Court, High Court of Justiciary

26 February 2013

[2014] HJAC 99

Were signed statements taken by police officers on the instructions of the procurator fiscal "precognitions" and therefore inadmissable as evidence?

Judgment: http://tinyurl.com/Beurskens-v-HMA

Owen's blog: http://www.mullanadvocate.co.uk/beurskens-v-hma-precognition-or-statement/

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced, and like the show on Facebook:

www.facebook.com/podslawjk

You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>1734scotland,crime,evidence,justiciary,precognitioncleanfullJulius KomorowskiThe fifth show in our series is with Owen Mullan, Advocate, of Mackinnon Advocates. You can find out about him here: www.mullanadvocate.co.uk We discuss the following case: = Beurskens v HM Advocate = Appeal Court, High Court of Justiciary 26 February 2013 [2014] HJAC 99 Were signed statements taken by police officers on the instructions of the procurator fiscal "precognitions" and therefore inadmissable as evidence? Judgment: http://tinyurl.com/Beurskens-v-HMA Owen's blog: http://www.mullanadvocate.co.uk/beurskens-v-hma-precognition-or-statement/ == About the series == You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced, and like the show on Facebook: www.facebook.com/podslawjk You can also subscribe through iTunes: www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunesNojulius.komorowski@advocates.org.uk (Julius Komorowski)https://www.spreaker.com/user/5745794/mcalpine-on-child-law
www.tinyurl.com/Scott-McAlpine

We discuss the following cases:

= S, Petitioners =

Inner House, Court of Session

9 May 2014

[2014] CSIH 43; 2014 Fam LR 23

Whether ECHR, Article 8 considerations relevant to whether parental consent to adoption should be dispensed with.

http://tinyurl.com/S-petitioners

= JM v Taylor =

Inner House, Court of Session

10 July 2014

[2014] CSIH 62

In what circumstances is it expedient to pursue an appeal against a decision of the children's panel to the Inner House?

http://tinyurl.com/JM-v-Taylor

= JS v Mulrooney =

Inner House, Court of Session

29 July 2014

[2014] CSIH 70

In a hearing for determining whether grounds of referral to a children's hearing are established, what does the sheriff's duty to give reasons consist of? In an appeal against that sheriff's decision, when can the Inner House interfere?

http://tinyurl.com/JS-v-Mulrooney

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced, and like the show on Facebook:

www.facebook.com/podslawjk

You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/4938497Sun, 07 Sep 2014 21:52:23 +0000Julius KomorowskiThe fourth show in our series is with Scott McAlpine, Advocate, of Westwater Advocates. You can find out about him here: www.tinyurl.com/Scott-McAlpine We discuss the following cases: = S, Petitioners = Inner House, Court of Session 9 May 2014...
www.tinyurl.com/Scott-McAlpine

We discuss the following cases:

= S, Petitioners =

Inner House, Court of Session

9 May 2014

[2014] CSIH 43; 2014 Fam LR 23

Whether ECHR, Article 8 considerations relevant to whether parental consent to adoption should be dispensed with.

http://tinyurl.com/S-petitioners

= JM v Taylor =

Inner House, Court of Session

10 July 2014

[2014] CSIH 62

In what circumstances is it expedient to pursue an appeal against a decision of the children's panel to the Inner House?

http://tinyurl.com/JM-v-Taylor

= JS v Mulrooney =

Inner House, Court of Session

29 July 2014

[2014] CSIH 70

In a hearing for determining whether grounds of referral to a children's hearing are established, what does the sheriff's duty to give reasons consist of? In an appeal against that sheriff's decision, when can the Inner House interfere?

http://tinyurl.com/JS-v-Mulrooney

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced, and like the show on Facebook:

www.facebook.com/podslawjk

You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>1776children,child,court,scotland,lawcleanfullJulius KomorowskiThe fourth show in our series is with Scott McAlpine, Advocate, of Westwater Advocates. You can find out about him here: www.tinyurl.com/Scott-McAlpine We discuss the following cases: = S, Petitioners = Inner House, Court of Session 9 May 2014 [2014] CSIH 43; 2014 Fam LR 23 Whether ECHR, Article 8 considerations relevant to whether parental consent to adoption should be dispensed with. http://tinyurl.com/S-petitioners = JM v Taylor = Inner House, Court of Session 10 July 2014 [2014] CSIH 62 In what circumstances is it expedient to pursue an appeal against a decision of the children's panel to the Inner House? http://tinyurl.com/JM-v-Taylor = JS v Mulrooney = Inner House, Court of Session 29 July 2014 [2014] CSIH 70 In a hearing for determining whether grounds of referral to a children's hearing are established, what does the sheriff's duty to give reasons consist of? In an appeal against that sheriff's decision, when can the Inner House interfere? http://tinyurl.com/JS-v-Mulrooney == About the series == You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced, and like the show on Facebook: www.facebook.com/podslawjk You can also subscribe through iTunes: www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunesNojulius.komorowski@advocates.org.uk (Julius Komorowski)https://www.spreaker.com/user/5745794/leighton-on-detention-article-5-echr
www.tinyurl.com/DavidLeighton

We discuss the following case:

= P v Cheshire West and Cheshire Council ("Cheshire West") =

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

19 March 2014

[2014] UKSC 19

Whether and in what circumstances individuals with learning disabilities, cared for in a residential setting, were detained in terms of the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 5.

www.tinyurl.com/CheshireWest

At the end of the podcast I also mention:

= Re X (deprivation of liberty) =

Court of Protection of England & Wales

7 August 2014

[2014] EWCOP 25

In what manner should the cases of those who must be regarded as being detained following the Cheshire West judgment be reviewed by the Court of Protection?

www.tinyurl.com/X-Deprivation

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced. You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/4836761Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:24:45 +0000Julius KomorowskiThe third show in our new series is with David Leighton, Advocate, of Hastie Stable. You can find out about him here: www.tinyurl.com/DavidLeighton We discuss the following case: = P v Cheshire West and Cheshire Council ("Cheshire West") = Supreme...
www.tinyurl.com/DavidLeighton

We discuss the following case:

= P v Cheshire West and Cheshire Council ("Cheshire West") =

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

19 March 2014

[2014] UKSC 19

Whether and in what circumstances individuals with learning disabilities, cared for in a residential setting, were detained in terms of the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 5.

www.tinyurl.com/CheshireWest

At the end of the podcast I also mention:

= Re X (deprivation of liberty) =

Court of Protection of England & Wales

7 August 2014

[2014] EWCOP 25

In what manner should the cases of those who must be regarded as being detained following the Cheshire West judgment be reviewed by the Court of Protection?

www.tinyurl.com/X-Deprivation

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced. You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>1778court,law,supreme,detention,echrcleanfullJulius KomorowskiThe third show in our new series is with David Leighton, Advocate, of Hastie Stable. You can find out about him here: www.tinyurl.com/DavidLeighton We discuss the following case: = P v Cheshire West and Cheshire Council ("Cheshire West") = Supreme Court of the United Kingdom 19 March 2014 [2014] UKSC 19 Whether and in what circumstances individuals with learning disabilities, cared for in a residential setting, were detained in terms of the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 5. www.tinyurl.com/CheshireWest At the end of the podcast I also mention: = Re X (deprivation of liberty) = Court of Protection of England & Wales 7 August 2014 [2014] EWCOP 25 In what manner should the cases of those who must be regarded as being detained following the Cheshire West judgment be reviewed by the Court of Protection? www.tinyurl.com/X-Deprivation == About the series == You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced. You can also subscribe through iTunes: www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunesNojulius.komorowski@advocates.org.uk (Julius Komorowski)https://www.spreaker.com/user/5745794/stark-on-assisted-suicide
www.tinyurl.com/FindlayStark

You can also follow Dr Stark on twitter here:

www.twitter.com/findlaystark

We discuss the following case:

= R (o.t.a. Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice =

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

[2014] UKSC 38

Whether the blanket ban on assisted suicide contained in the Suicide Act 1961 was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights; and whether the Director of Public Prosecutions was required by Article 8 to give more precise guidance as to when prosecutions of assisted suicide would ensue.

www.tinyurl.com/Nicklinson

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced. You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/4729017Sun, 13 Jul 2014 18:36:35 +0000Julius KomorowskiThe second show in our new series is with Dr Findlay Stark of Jesus College, University of Cambridge. You can find out about him here: www.tinyurl.com/FindlayStark You can also follow Dr Stark on twitter here: www.twitter.com/findlaystark We...
www.tinyurl.com/FindlayStark

You can also follow Dr Stark on twitter here:

www.twitter.com/findlaystark

We discuss the following case:

= R (o.t.a. Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice =

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

[2014] UKSC 38

Whether the blanket ban on assisted suicide contained in the Suicide Act 1961 was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights; and whether the Director of Public Prosecutions was required by Article 8 to give more precise guidance as to when prosecutions of assisted suicide would ensue.

www.tinyurl.com/Nicklinson

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced. You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>1749suicide,court,law,euthanasia,nicklinsoncleanfullJulius KomorowskiThe second show in our new series is with Dr Findlay Stark of Jesus College, University of Cambridge. You can find out about him here: www.tinyurl.com/FindlayStark You can also follow Dr Stark on twitter here: www.twitter.com/findlaystark We discuss the following case: = R (o.t.a. Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice = Supreme Court of the United Kingdom [2014] UKSC 38 Whether the blanket ban on assisted suicide contained in the Suicide Act 1961 was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights; and whether the Director of Public Prosecutions was required by Article 8 to give more precise guidance as to when prosecutions of assisted suicide would ensue. www.tinyurl.com/Nicklinson == About the series == You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced. You can also subscribe through iTunes: www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunesNojulius.komorowski@advocates.org.uk (Julius Komorowski)https://www.spreaker.com/user/5745794/new-series-mccluskey-on-crime
You can view his profile here: www.tinyurl.com/NiallMcC

We discuss the following recent cases:

= Guardian News and Media Ltd -v- AB & CD =

Court of Appeal: Criminal Division (Gross LJ, Simon & Burnett JJ)

12 June 2014

Whether a terrorism trial could be held with the public and press entirely excluded from proceedings, and the identity of the accused withheld.

www.tinyurl.com/terrorism-trial

= R -v- Crawley =

Court of Appeal: Criminal Division (President of the Queen's Bench Division (Leveson), Davis & Treacy LJJ)

21 May 2014

[2014] EWCA Crim 1028

Whether a complex fraud trial should be stopped in view of difficulties in obtaining counsel willing to appear for the accused.

www.tinyurl.com/CoA-legal-aid

= Bruce Smith -v- Procurator Fiscal, Aberdeen =

High Court of Justiciary (Lady Smith, Lady Clark of Calton, Lord Philip)

10 April 2014

[2014] HJAC 25

Whether accused who possessed a souvenir knuckle-duster and baton bought abroad on holiday had a reasonable excuse for its possession in transit to his home.

www.tinyurl.com/souvenir-weapons

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced. You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/4615191Sun, 15 Jun 2014 18:23:54 +0000Julius KomorowskiOur new series begins with an interview with Niall McCluskey, Advocate. Niall is a member of Black Chambers. You can view his profile here: www.tinyurl.com/NiallMcC We discuss the following recent cases: = Guardian News and Media Ltd -v- AB & CD =...
You can view his profile here: www.tinyurl.com/NiallMcC

We discuss the following recent cases:

= Guardian News and Media Ltd -v- AB & CD =

Court of Appeal: Criminal Division (Gross LJ, Simon & Burnett JJ)

12 June 2014

Whether a terrorism trial could be held with the public and press entirely excluded from proceedings, and the identity of the accused withheld.

www.tinyurl.com/terrorism-trial

= R -v- Crawley =

Court of Appeal: Criminal Division (President of the Queen's Bench Division (Leveson), Davis & Treacy LJJ)

21 May 2014

[2014] EWCA Crim 1028

Whether a complex fraud trial should be stopped in view of difficulties in obtaining counsel willing to appear for the accused.

www.tinyurl.com/CoA-legal-aid

= Bruce Smith -v- Procurator Fiscal, Aberdeen =

High Court of Justiciary (Lady Smith, Lady Clark of Calton, Lord Philip)

10 April 2014

[2014] HJAC 25

Whether accused who possessed a souvenir knuckle-duster and baton bought abroad on holiday had a reasonable excuse for its possession in transit to his home.

www.tinyurl.com/souvenir-weapons

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced. You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes]]>1711scotland,law,crime,terrorism,justiciarycleanfullJulius KomorowskiOur new series begins with an interview with Niall McCluskey, Advocate. Niall is a member of Black Chambers. You can view his profile here: www.tinyurl.com/NiallMcC We discuss the following recent cases: = Guardian News and Media Ltd -v- AB & CD = Court of Appeal: Criminal Division (Gross LJ, Simon & Burnett JJ) 12 June 2014 Whether a terrorism trial could be held with the public and press entirely excluded from proceedings, and the identity of the accused withheld. www.tinyurl.com/terrorism-trial = R -v- Crawley = Court of Appeal: Criminal Division (President of the Queen's Bench Division (Leveson), Davis & Treacy LJJ) 21 May 2014 [2014] EWCA Crim 1028 Whether a complex fraud trial should be stopped in view of difficulties in obtaining counsel willing to appear for the accused. www.tinyurl.com/CoA-legal-aid = Bruce Smith -v- Procurator Fiscal, Aberdeen = High Court of Justiciary (Lady Smith, Lady Clark of Calton, Lord Philip) 10 April 2014 [2014] HJAC 25 Whether accused who possessed a souvenir knuckle-duster and baton bought abroad on holiday had a reasonable excuse for its possession in transit to his home. www.tinyurl.com/souvenir-weapons == About the series == You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced. You can also subscribe through iTunes: www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunesNojulius.komorowski@advocates.org.uk (Julius Komorowski)