Right Doctrine Matters

You Don't Have To Call Or Pray (Ask) To Get To Heaven

2026-05-04T13:38:00.066-05:00

John 6:47, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.”

I humbly agree with Pastor Jack Hyles (1926-2001) that prayer is not necessary to be saved.

Dr. Jack Hyles on a 'Sinner's Prayer' for Salvation

Granted, it is natural for most converts to pray at the time of faith, but the Bible is very clear in Romans 10:14 that we are saved at the moment of FAITH, and not calling or praying (i.e., asking to be saved. When a sinner walks down a church aisle in response to a salvation invitation, they are simply going down front to find out what just happened. They were saved before they even left their pew, at the moment they BELIEVED the Gospel.

Having said that, I am opposed to pastors who require people to walk an aisle to learn how to go to Heaven. Every preacher should tell sinners how to be saved in their pew, regardless of whether they want to come forward. It is a grave sin to add an additional step to God's simple plan of salvation, when God only requires that someone BELIEVE ON THE LORD JESUS CHRIST to be saved.

I don't know when I was saved. I didn't think to write it down. I remember a place, an experience and calling upon Jesus in faith to save me around 1979 or 1980. Since I know that I am saved, I do not worry about the year. But everyone should definitely remember a place and a time when you knew that you were a needy sinner, and you put your trust in Jesus as your personal Savior.

I learned a great truth from Pastor Bob Gray Sr. years ago, which is that Jesus does NOT forgive sin. Jesus has already paid for everyone's sins with His precious blood (1st Peter 1:18-19), which is why eternal life is offered to us as a “free gift” (Romans 5:15-18). A gift need only be taken, not merited. Dr. John MacArthur foolishly taught that salvation is an exchange, a trade of sorts. ...

“Thus in a sense we pay the ultimate price for salvation when our sinful self is nailed to a cross. ...It is an exchange of all that we are for all that Christ is. And it denotes implicit obedience, full surrender to the lordship of Christ. Nothing less can qualify as saving faith.” ('The Gospel According to Jesus,' p. 140)

Sadly, John MacArthur (1939-2025) is now burning in Hell forever without hope. His counterfeit plan of salvation that required "full surrender" to Christ's Lordship could not produce the required new birth to enter into God's Kingdom. We see this truth demonstrated in Matthew 7:21-23. They devoutly followed Jesus in dedicated service, but failed to ever rest in the finished redemptive work of Christ.

No, Mr. MacArthur, salvation is NOT an exchange of all that we are for all that Christ is; it is NOT a trade of sorts! It is a FREE GIFT! You don't have to "ask" for a gift, you simply receive it by faith (by taking God at His written Word), to accept Christ's sacrifice on the cross as full payment for your sins, believing that He was buried, but then miraculously resurrected from the dead three days later. This is the true Gospel which saves according to 1st Corinthians 15:1-6.

I do not scold pastors for using the sinner's prayer. Even Pastor Jack Hyles (1926-2001), who emphasizes in this sermon excerpt that you don't have to pray to get saved, chose to use a sinner's prayer in the Roman's Road presentation of the Gospel. So, I am okay with pastors using the sinner's prayer, providing that they explain it is faith and not prayer that saves a sinner, which is exactly what Brother Hyles is doing in this needful and helpful video excerpt.

When I got saved I worried for several years that I might not be saved. I was fearful because I was focusing on the sinner's prayer. Since I couldn't remember what I had prayed, I just figured I would ask God to save me again, and again, and again, and again for over 10 years, wallowing in needless fear, mental anguish, tears, frustration, uncertainty and worry. No one has ever properly presented God's simple plan of salvation to me. Although I knew that prayer does not save a man, faith does, I still associated getting saved with the sinner's prayer, and that effectively blocked my brain from seeing the simplicity that is in Christ.

I had stopped worrying about God's free gift of salvation long before I had finally obtained perfect peace that solidified my salvation beliefs from Pastor Max D. Younce's helpful book: “SALVATION AND THE PUBLIC INVITATION”...

https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/.../salvationandthepublic...

In this book, Dr. Younce strongly criticizes the needless practice of requiring sinners to walk down a church aisle to find out how to go to Heaven, which practice I hate. ...

https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/.../pastor_kurt_skelly.htm

God only knows how how people are burning in Hell forever, all because some selfish pastor refused to tell them how to be saved in their pew. The reason why Pastor Younce's book helped me so much is because I was saved in a pew. I had always felt guilty for being too shy to walk forward as a young teenager, wondering if it would have made a difference if I had that day.

In the years to follow I read Chick Tracts and every piece of religious literature I could get my hands on, searching for answers to settle my ongoing struggle with the assurance of God's free gift of salvation. Oh that I would have had this wonderful book by Michael P. Bowen, "I NEVER KNEW YOU," when I needed answers. This great book would have cleared my dark stormy skies...

https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/BTP/i_never_knew_you.pdf

I have not doubted my salvation in decades, because I now by God's wondrous grace fully comprehend His great plan of salvation. I gleaned this great quote from Brother Younce: "Salvation is not doing your best, it is having Christ's best put to your account through receiving Him by faith." I love that truth!

So, I do not use the sinner's prayer, nor do I recommend that others use it. There is absolutely nothing wrong with accompanying one's faith with a sinner's prayer, which is essentially asking God to save you, and that is just fine. However, I do take offense and stand firmly against those preachers today who insist that you cannot be saved without praying or calling (asking) to go to Heaven. No such requirement is taught in the inspired King James Bible.

My ministry friend Onorato (Norm) Diamante on YouTube has been verbally attacked (by a particular pastor in Texas), called an "idiot" and "a child of the Devil" for faithfully preaching the biblical truth that you don't have to pray to be saved. Well, Pastor Jack Hyles and myself agree with Onorato.

There is no mention of the 3,000 sinners who were saved on the Day of Pentecost praying or asking to be saved, they simply "gladly received" Peter's Gospel message (Acts 2:41) and were born again.

Nor is there any mention of Cornelius and his companions calling, praying or asking to be saved, they simply believed the GOOD NEWS that they heard preached unto them and were converted (Acts 10:43-44; Galatians 3:2). Faith is the only righteous thing that I can do.

I have heard numerous preachers down play this issue, asking what's the big deal. But they are the one's making it a big deal, by denying that you can get to Heaven without asking, calling or praying to be saved. What saith the Scripture? 𝗝𝗼𝗵𝗻 𝟲:𝟰𝟳, “𝗩𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗹𝘆, 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗹𝘆, 𝗜 𝘀𝗮𝘆 𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂, 𝗛𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲.”

And although Jesus did invite the Samaritan woman in John 4:10 to "ask" Him for the Living Water, there is not one mention in the remainder of the chapter about any of the Samaritans asking Jesus to save them. There is no mention of anyone "asking" to be saved, they simply believed on the dear Savior and were saved. Here is what we read...

John 4:39-42, “And many of the Samaritans of that city believed on him for the saying of the woman, which testified, He told me all that ever I did. So when the Samaritans were come unto him, they besought him that he would tarry with them: and he abode there two days. And many more believed because of his own word; And said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world.”

Let me give you a good illustration. Let's say that it is your birthday and I mail you a birthday present. It arrives by UPS on your birthday and you are holding the gift in your hands with excitement, anticipating what might be inside. Oh boy! Would you call me on the phone, or send me an email, asking if you can open your gift? No, of course not, that would be silly! So what in the world makes someone think that receiving a gift from God is any different? Why would you need to pray to ask God for a gift that He is already freely offering you?

In the cases of the 3,000 Jews saved at Pentecost in Acts 2, and Cornelius and his friends in Acts 10, and the Roman jailer in Acts 16:30-31—there is no mention of anyone "asking" to be saved, they simply believed on the dear Savior and were saved. Shame on any pastor who tries to make you feel bad or stupid for simply believing that faith is enough to get to Heaven.

Pastor Charles Lawson's Damnable Counterfeit Plan Of Salvation

2026-04-29T00:19:46.486-05:00

Luke 13:1-5, “There were present at that season some that told him of the Galilaeans, whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices. And Jesus answering said unto them, Suppose ye that these Galilaeans were sinners above all the Galilaeans, because they suffered such things? I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. Or those eighteen, upon whom the tower in Siloam fell, and slew them, think ye that they were sinners above all men that dwelt in Jerusalem? I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.”

Kindly said, Pastor Charles Lawson (born 1950) has been the long time pastor of the Temple Baptist Church in Knoxville, Tennessee, for 48 years. Sadly, he is a hellbound Calvinist false prophet who preaches damnable heresy. Here is what Lawson teaches...

“Easy-Believism folks, in my estimation, is an abomination to God. Really, because you're giving people a false hope that everything's okay between them and God.” —Pastor Charles Lawson, “Repentance” (Sunday morning service at Temple Baptist Church in Knoxville; preached on April 8, 2018)

Blasphemy! Dear reader, what is so hard about getting saved? The inspired Holy Bible says eternal life is a “free gift” (Romans 5:15-18). Jesus said in John 6:47, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.” What is so hard about that?

Charles Lawson preaches with zeal and authority. I have listened to his sermons for years. Yet, he is wrong on repentance and God's simple plan of salvation.

A Changed Life Is The “Fruit” Of The Indwelling Holy Spirit, Not Repentance Or Salvation

According to Lawson, repentance is not the root of salvation, but the fruit of salvation. That is WRONG! A changed life is the “fruit” of the indwelling Holy Spirit (Galatians 5:22-25), which has nothing to do with the new birth. To say that repentance is the fruit of salvation is to mandate that if your life doesn't change, you're not really saved, and that is exactly what Pastor Lawson foolishly teaches.

One of the most helpful sermons you'll ever hear is by Pastor Jack Hyles (1926-2001) titled, “Your Salvation Did Not Change You A Bit.” Dr. Hyles likens getting saved to a real estate transaction in which a property has exchanged ownership. In the case of salvation, ownership has changed from Satan to God. We are now God's property. But when you acquire ownership of any property it needs to be renovated. Just because you purchase a building and some property doesn't change it's appearance or interior design. You must renovate it! Likewise, the Holy Spirit begins to work in a believer's life to renew our mind with the inspired Word of God (1st Peter 2:2; Romans 12:1-2), and that takes time. If that individual person does not attend a local Bible-believing church, they will not grow. This is why Jesus in The Great Commission included mentoring new converts, teaching them whatsoever things Christ has taught us (Matthew 28:19-20).

The inspired King James Bible plainly says in Galatians 5:25, “If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.” Now, if repentance is a fruit of salvation as Lawson errantly teaches, then why would the Bible command us to WALK IN THE SPIRIT? When you get born again you are alive in the Holy Spirit, but if you don't choose to walk in that Spirit day by day as God's redeemed child, by default you will WALK IN THE FLESH. Galatians 5:25 is proof that just because you are saved doesn't guarantee that you will walk in the Spirit to live a changed life. Repentance in the life of a Christian is produced by the “fruit” of the Holy Spirit, and is NOT an automatic result of salvation. Those preachers who fail to understand this biblical truth fall into the traps of Lordship Salvation and Misunderstood Repentance.

Pastor Lawson Is A Dangerous False Prophet

At best Lawson is very confusing. In his sermon “Repentance” he mentions two infamous serial killers (David Berkowitz “Son of Sam” and Karla Faye Tucker) and how they allegedly found Christ in prison. He uses them as showcase examples of how all sinners should react when they get saved, which is ridiculous and unscriptural. It is clear that Pastor Lawson is implying that every convert should react to the Gospel in the same radical way that these two serial killers did. Dear reader, the only thing you need to know to be saved is that you are a needy hell-deserving guilty sinner and that Jesus is the only Savior who was crucified to pay for your sins, was buried and resurrected from the dead three days later (i.e., the Gospel).

Now, Pastor Lawson is a very confused and confusing man. At no place in his sermon does he bother to tell you what is so wrong with Easy-Believism, except that he thinks it means to pray a sinner's prayer. I am sick and tired of corrupt preachers attacking the sinner's prayer. There is absolutely nothing wrong with praying a sinner's prayer. But you don't get saved by praying, asking or calling, you get saved by BELIEVING THE GOOD NEWS of Jesus Christ crucified, buried and risen from the dead. It's difficult to know what Charles Lawson is talking about because he just foolishly attacks Easy-Believism without explaining hardly anything. What an incompetent preacher!!! I said Pastor Charles Lawson is INCOMPETENT!!!

Easy-Believism is 100% biblical and right! It is free, simple and easy to be saved through just BELIEVING that Jesus did it all for you. Now here is a heretical statement that he makes...

“Repentance in your life is God's way of letting you know that you have saving faith, and not just a bunch of stuff you believe up here. Somebody says some mumbo-jumbo over you, or gets you wet in some pool somewhere, or confirms you, or you prayed the sinner's prayer, and everybody assured you that you're a Christian, but deep down inside your soul you know you're just as dead as you've always been; nothing has changed. But if repentance begins to blossom (and this is important), you're going to do far more repenting after you get saved than that day when you're praying for God to save you. For once the Holy Ghost moves into your soul, you're really going to see what you're made out of.” —Pastor Charles Lawson, “Repentance” (Sunday morning service at Temple Baptist Church in Knoxville; preached on April 8, 2018)

Now, that sounds great to the unlearned Bible student, but it is totally unbiblical. Lawson is confusing repentance with the Holy Spirit. He pounds home the idea that you must repent of your sins and turn away from them as part of getting saved, but then he mentions the Holy Spirit. Dear reader, which is it? The work of the indwelling Holy Spirit is something VERY DIFFERENT than our human efforts to turn away from our sinful ways. Lawson fails to make a distinction.

Although I agree that Catholic confirmation and water baptism do not save a sinner, I take issue with his horrible attack against the sinner's prayer. Even though prayer does not save someone, if a sinner prays from a BELIEVING HEART, they are saved according to Romans 10:14, “How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?” Even before someone calls upon the Lord they are already saved, the moment that they BELIEVED. You need to understand that Charles Lawson DOESN'T believe this to be true. Lawson foolishly thinks that you must turn from your sins to get to Heaven. Honestly, the guy has no formal theological training, which shows in his utter ignorance of the Holy Bible. I say this kindly to be honest and to warn others, lest you end up in Hell with him and his cult.

There is no guarantee just because you get saved that your life is going to radically change for righteousness. The idea that you must feel a profound hatred for your sins, experience guilt and have an earnest desire to turn from your sins is NOT what it means to repent to be saved. In fact, what Pastor Lawson is preaching is by every definition, LORDSHIP SALVATION!!!

The Greek noun for “repent” in the New Testament is metanoia, which simply means “to change your mind,” period. Since we don't know what to change our mind about, we need supplemental information, which can only be determined by the text of a particular passage. For example: The Bible says in Jonah 3:10 that God Himself “repented.” It is clear from the text that the LORD changed His mind not to destroy Nineveh. If repent means to turn away from your sins as Charles Lawson, Pensacola Christian College and other infidels today errantly teach, then how could God repent of sin? God is holy and cannot sin! God just changed His mind, which is all that the word “repent” means, nothing more.

Here are some godly Bible teachers who get Bible repentance 100% right, and I encourage you to read their writings, and then go back and look at the garbage Charles Lawson teaches:

Easy-Believism Is Not Wrong!

In his corrupt sermon “Repentance,” Pastor Lawson refutes two alleged heresies:

Easy-Believism
Lordship Salvation

Pastor Lawson describes a very radical definition of Lordship Salvation which requires obeying all of God's commandment in order to validate one's faith. That is what the Seventh-Day Adventist cult believe, a radical form of Lordship Salvation. But most forms of Lordship Salvation today are much more subtle. I like how Pastor Ralph Yankee Arnold describes Lordship Salvation...

“Lordship Salvation is the unsupportable and unbiblical belief that the performance of good works, the promise of good works, or the evidence of good works, must accompany faith in Christ to establish or provide evidence that such faith has resulted in eternal life.” —Pastor Ralph Yankee Arnold, “Jesus Versus John MacArthur”

Charles Lawson's corrupt plan of salvation is absolutely Lordship Salvation, even though he refuses to admit it. I shared with you his earlier horrible statement in which he calls Easy-Believism “an abomination to God.” An abomination to God? Whoa! What a darn fool! Lawson is a confused man, caught between grace and works. Dear friend, I challenge you to show me anything in the inspired King James Bible that says getting saved is difficult or hard. You cannot. Jesus likened getting saved in John 4:10 to drinking a cup of water. Jesus likened getting saved in John 10:9 with walking through a door. Jesus likened getting saved in John 6:53 with eating some bread. Jesus likened getting saved in John 3:14-16 with looking at a serpent on a pole. Getting saved is free, simple and easy, which is why we call it 'EASY-BELIEVISM!' So, what in tarnation is Pastor Charles Lawson talking about?

In the Gospel of John we find the word “believe” mentioned 85 times with no mention of the word “repent.” That speaks volumes! Pastor Lawson in his sermon says that Jesus continually preached about repentance, but that simply is not true. Sure, Jesus did preach about repentance at times, but there are ten times more passages in the inspired Word of God where Jesus simply said to simply “BELIEVE ON HIM” without any mention whatsoever about repenting. The reason why is obvious, because repentance is an automatic thing. The man who believes has repented; the man who repents has believed. THAT IS EASY-BELIEVISM!!!

Pastor Curtis Hutson Well Explains Luke 13:1-5

Dr. Curtis Hutson explains Luke 13:5 and gets it 100% correct:

In Luke 13:5 Jesus said, “I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.” The context of this verse shows that they needed to repent or change their mind regarding punishment and sin. In this passage, Christ was talking to good people who believed that people suffered only because of their sins, and they concluded that those in Galilee whose blood Pilate mingled with sacrifices and those on whom the tower of Siloam fell were greater sinners because they died such horrible deaths. Jesus contradicts the thinking of these self-righteous people and tells them that they need to repent or change their mind and see themselves as sinners, too, or they will perish in their own self-righteousness.

One does not have to know the Greek language to see that “repent” in this passage does not mean feeling sorry for or turning from sin.

SOURCE: Dr. Curtis Hutson, 'Repentance: What Does The Bible Teach?'

So, we see that it is very easy to take a passage of Scripture out of context. I can do all things through a Bible verse taken out of context!

I am not trying to be unkind, God knows my heart, but Pastor Lawson just doesn't know what he is doing theologically. He should have stayed an automobile mechanic, because he is a lousy preacher. I'm sure he loves his church members and they love him after 48 years, but he is a dangerous false teacher and in that regard he is a bad pastor.

I have heard Pastor Lawson wickedly attack Pastor Jack Hyles, quoting from Brother Hyles' chapter titled: 'Lordship Salvation: An Enemy Of Soul Winning,' falsely accusing Dr. Hyles of leaving off repentance. Nothing could be further from the truth! Dr. Hyles just didn't go along with the damnable heresy that says you must forsake a lifestyle of sinning to be saved, or to prove that you are saved. To do so would be the heresy of Lordship Salvation!

Pastor Lawson plainly teaches that repentance (which he errantly thinks means a radically changed life) is how you know you are saved. ...

“Repentance in your life is God's way of letting you know that you have saving faith, and not just a bunch of stuff you believe up here.” —Pastor Charles Lawson, “Repentance” (Sunday morning service at Temple Baptist Church in Knoxville; preached on April 8, 2018)

But if we were to examine the exterior lives of the false teachers in Matthew 7:21-23, they did “many wonderful works” in Jesus' name, preached (prophesied) in Jesus' name, and called Jesus “Lord, Lord,” but Jesus denied knowing them as His sheep, and they went to Hell forever. They failed to do the WILL OF THE FATHER, which according to John 6:40 is simply to BELIEVE ON JESUS. Nowhere does the Bible require repenting of your sins to be saved!

Charles Lawson Is A Clever Deceiver

The fact that Charles Lawson said that Lordship Salvation is wrong makes his false gospel even more deceiving. I heard a spiritually blind guy say that Charles Lawson doesn't preach Lordship Salvation. And I suspect the reason why is that by saying Lordship Salvation is wrong, it looks like Charles Lawson is right simply because he is correct that Lordship Salvation is wrong. It looks like he preaches right on repentance, when in actuality he's wrong in his own views, and does in fact preach Lordship Salvation himself.

Dr. John MacArthur (1939-2025) didn't say Lordship Salvation is wrong. That's what makes John MacArthur's falsehood of the gospel more obvious. But by Pastor Lawson saying that Lordship Salvation is wrong, while he is preaching it too, provides a cover for his deception. It was 33rd degree Freemason Manly P. Hall (1901-1990) who rightly said: “The best place to hide a lie is between two truths.” Manly Hall also eloquently rightly said: “The most effective lie is the half-truth because in part it can be defended with incontestable logic.” This Luciferian man well understood the art of lying and deception, which tactics Charles Lawson is using.

Being closer to the truth without the truth is more deceitful because it looks genuine.

Easy-Believism Is The Gospel

Kindly said, Charles Lawson is extremely wrong and foolish to deny Easy-Believism and denounce it as “an abomination to God.” What a terrible pastor for teaching that it is not easy to get to Heaven. He is so confused that he cannot even adequately explain what he is trying to convey. Are there some insincere people who merely pray some “Jesus prayer” and never really get saved? Why of course! But such cases are rare in my humble opinion.

On the Day of Pentecost in Acts chapter two 3,000 Jews simply “gladly received” (Acts 2:41) Peter's Gospel message and were instantly saved and added to the church. No one was interrogated to see if they were sincere. No one was monitored for 6 months to see if their behavior changed. They were baptized in water right away, as a public profession of their new found faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. There is no mention of anyone praying, they simply believed what they heard. I supposed Charles Lawson has a problem with that too!

But Jesus did invite the Samaritan woman to pray a sinner's prayer in John 4:10, to “ask” Him for the Living Water of eternal life. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the sinner's prayer, and I disrespect Pastor Lawson for criticizing it. Pastor Lawson can pretend that he is not in the same boat as Pastor John MacArthur (1939-2025) and Dr. R.C. Sproul (1939-2017), the godfathers of Lordship Salvation today, but he is just as guilty as those wicked men.

It is very inappropriate to label people who make light of getting saved, or insincerely go through the outward motions of Christianity without ever being born again, as “Easy-Believism,” which is what Charles Lawson is sinfully doing. You can definitely call such people “False Converts” or better yet, “Tares” (as the Bible calls them).

But there is nothing difficult or hard about getting born again. It is a free gift, which even Pastor Lawson acknowledges in his sermon “Repentance.” And he is dead wrong that believing the Gospel in your mind is insufficient to be saved unless a changed life goes along with it. ...

“Repentance in your life is God's way of letting you know that you have saving faith, and not just a bunch of stuff you believe up here.” —Pastor Charles Lawson, “Repentance” (Sunday morning service at Temple Baptist Church in Knoxville; preached on April 8, 2018)

I hope you clearly see the fallacy and danger of his false teachings. According to Pastor Lawson your faith is invalid unless you've experienced a radical change of behavior and attitude in your life (which he errantly mistakes to mean repentance). That is 100% Lordship Salvation, which he fails to realize or else won't admit. He is combining service with salvation. He is mixing discipleship with sonship. The two must never meet, just like positive and negative battery cables! It is tragic that we've got a bunch of loud-mouthed arrogant fools behind church pulpits today, who are unlearned and wrest the Word of God to their own destruction, and the doom of their victims who follow them into perdition.

I love this excellent quote by Pilgrim's Progress author John Bunyan (1628-1688)...

“If you do not put a difference between justification wrought by the man Christ without and sanctification wrought by the Spirit of Christ within, you are not able to divide the Word aright; but contrariwise, you corrupt the Word of God, and cast stumbling blocks before the people.” —Evangelist John Bunyan

And this great helpful quote by Pastor M.R. DeHaan (1891-1965)...

“There is a vast difference between coming to Jesus for salvation and coming after Jesus for service. Coming to Christ makes one a believer, while coming after Christ makes one a disciple. All believers are not disciples. To become a believer one accepts the invitation of the Gospel, to be a disciple one obeys the challenge to a life of dedicated service and separation. Salvation comes through the sacrifice of Christ; discipleship comes only by sacrifice of self and surrender to His call for devoted service. Salvation is free, but discipleship involves paying the price of a separated walk. Salvation can't be lost because it depends upon God's faithfulness, but discipleship can be lost because it depends upon our faithfulness.” —Pastor M.R. DeHaan, “Hebrews”; Zondervan Publishing House; 1959 (p. 117)

You'll never hear any such biblical truth from Pastor Charles Lawson, he just spews his ignorance of God's Word and confuses people with his Satanic Calvinist ramblings, slandering godly preachers like Pastor Jack Hyles who preached THE TRUTH about Bible repentance.

John Bunyan would have ate Charles Lawson for lunch, and then run him out of the church pulpit by sundown for preaching damnable heresy, for perverting the Gospel! ...

The King James Bible Is 100% Verbally And Plenary Inspired By God

2026-04-28T21:19:00.000-05:00

Psalms 12:6-7, “The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.”

I cannot warn everybody enough about the Satanic CULT at Pensacola Christian College today. Their Campus Church cannot be a genuine church if they are preaching another Gospel. They have been bewitched (Galatians 3:1). I found four different conflicting plans of salvation at PCC, which just proves that making money is their top priority, and protecting the name of their CULT, but individual people and the truth do not matter there. It couldn't be more obvious that they are straddling the fence, playing both sides of the card table, hobnobbing with the Devil's Calvinist CULT at Bob Jones University.

In this needful sermon excerpt, Pastor Jack Hyles exposes Pensacola Christian College for denying that we have an inspired perfect Holy Bible today. I THANK GOD for soulwinning preachers like Brother Hyles and Pastor David Baker (1967-2024) who upheld the INSPIRATION of our beloved KING JAMES BIBLE. Thankfully, I downloaded Pastor Baker's entire website a few years ago, to preserve his labors for the next generation.

Here is Pastor Baker's unedited Statement of Faith regarding the inspired Word of God, as posted from his HACalumni dot com (no longer in existence) website...

𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗢𝗙 𝗙𝗔𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗢𝗡 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗝𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗦 𝗕𝗜𝗕𝗟𝗘
"We believe that, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God..." (2 Tim. 3:16) and that "every word of God is pure" (Prov. 30:5). We believe that the 66 books (Old Testament and New Testament) of our English scriptures, which is the King James Bible (1611), were given under the direct supervision and supernatural guidance of the Holy Spirit and therefore constitute the perfect, preserved and inspired words of God without any admixture of error (Ps. 12:6,7; Ps. 19:7). We do not subscribe to the heresy that only the "original manuscripts" are inspired and preserved. This Holy Bible is our sole authority for truth for all Christian belief and practice."

Amen and amen! That is exactly what I believe and preach as well.

BEWARE of Bob Jones University, Pensacola Christian College, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Faith Baptist Bible College & Theological Seminary, Dallas Theological Seminary; and sadly, Hyles-Anderson College today (to name but a few corrupt institutions), who ALL deny that the King James Bible is inspired by God.

What saith the Scripture? 𝗝𝗼𝗵𝗻 𝟲:𝟲𝟯, “𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗵; 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗹𝗲𝘀𝗵 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝘁𝗲𝘁𝗵 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴: 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗸 𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗶𝘁, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲.” By “inspired” I simply mean that the King James Bible was faithfully translated by 54 men from texts that were already inspired; that is, they were breathed out by God, so they are God's Words, not man's words.

Respectfully, in 2009 Pastor Jack Schaap errantly taught at Pastor's School that the PROCESS alone of God breathing out his Words was inspired, but not the WORDS themselves. That is preposterous in light of John 6:63. Jesus said that the WORDS He spoke are SPIRIT and they are LIFE. The Lord's Words are LIVING WORDS (Hebrews 4:12). It is the WORDS of God that are eternally inspired, forever settled in Heaven (Psalm 119:89).

In 2015, Dr. Russell Anderson (1931-2023) wrote an open letter to Pastor John Wilkerson at the First Baptist Church of Hammond, and insisted that the church to REMOVE his name from Hyles-Anderson College because the church refused to return to their previous doctrinal position (when Pastor Hyles was still alive) that the King James Bible is inspired by God.

Brother Hyles warned every member of the First Baptist Church of Hammond to appoint them self as a guardian of one against heresy creeping into the church. He warned not to allow a half dozen men to CHANGE the church for the worst, which is exactly what happened...

In 2009, Dr. Hyles shameful son in law Dr. Jack Schaap CHANGED the church's long time held position that the King James Bible is inspired by God. So sad! Satan is a beautiful liar!

Most perverted modern translators, such as the New International Version (NIV) committee claim that only the THOUGHTS (Dynamic Theory) are inspired, but not the actual WORDS. That is a blatant lie of Satan! In Psalms 12:6-7 the King James Bible promises that God would keep and preserve His WORDS, not His thoughts, unto every generation. Not surprisingly, EVERY modern perverted Bible revisions has changed and corrupted verse 7 to say that God preserves the saints instead of His Words.

Some heretics (like the First Baptist Church of Hammond today, who control Hyles-Anderson College) foolishly claim that God only "preserved" His Words, but didn't promise to perpetually "inspire" them. That is lunacy! Dr. Jack Hyles is absolutely right, what good is preservation without inspiration? I mean, if somewhere along the way God's perfectly inspired words became corrupted by men and lost their inspiration, then prey tell me what would be the purpose of preserving them?

SHAME on any preacher or Bible professor who denies that we have a perfectly inspired Holy Bible today in the English language. Pastor Al Lacy (1933-2016) was absolutely right, "There can be only one true Bible in any language." I believe we have that perfectly inspired Holy Bible in the 1611 King James Bible.

And although there have been numerous editions to update typos and spelling, there have not been any new translations since 1611. I stand firm with pastors' David Baker, Jack Hyles, Ralph Yankee Arnold, Bob Gray Sr., Allen Domelle, Steven Anderson, Al Lacy and other faithful fundamentalist Bible preachers that the King James Bible is 100% verbally and plenary inspired by God. That means they are God's Words, not mere mortal man's words.

If even one verse in the Holy Bible is corrupt, then any part of the Bible could also be corrupt, and we do not have the truth today. If I sincerely thought that the King James Bible is not inspired by God, I'd throw it into the garbage pail and never read it again. Don't anyone dare tell me that I cannot exclaim with the psalmist in 𝗣𝘀𝗮𝗹𝗺𝘀 𝟭𝟭𝟵:𝟭𝟰𝟬, “𝗧𝗵𝘆 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗶𝘀 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗽𝘂𝗿𝗲: 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲𝘁𝗵 𝗶𝘁.”

In my collection of archives from Pastor David Baker, I found this 2009 Northwest News publication from Pastor Keith Gomez's church. Now Pastor Gomez is WRONG on repentance (and thus the Gospel), so I DO NOT support his ministry, but there is some very helpful information in this 2009 publication in defense of the inspiration of the King James Bible.

I vehemently reject Dr. Jack Schaap's garbage teaching that God only inspired the Hebrew, Chaldean and Greek, and that we all need to become language experts to understand God's Word.

The Holy Spirit Produces A Changed Life, Not The Sinner

2026-04-25T12:02:00.003-05:00

Galatians 5:22-25, “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law. And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts. If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.”

There has been a long time controversy over the biblical meaning of repentance. But dear reader, there is no debate if you simply take the Bible at face value. The Greek noun metanoia just means “a change of mind.” The verb form metanoeo means “to think differently.” I am tired of corrupt preachers adding to these definitions. By themselves, these definitions do not provide enough information to know what to change our mind about. So, we need supplemental information, which can only be determined by the particular Scripture text in a passage. It is poor Bible scholarship (and wicked according to Proverbs 30:5-6) to read into the inspired Holy Bible what it does not say.

For example: Their official position at Pensacola Christian College (PCC), which is taught in their Foundation's Class to all newcomers is that: “Repentance is a change of mind resulting in a change of behavior.” Uh, no, that is absolutely NOT what Bible repentance means. The Greek noun “metanoia” doesn't tell us what to change our mind about. So, why is Campus Church at PCC adding to God's Word? PCC are guilty of changing God's Word into a lie, guilty of perverting God's simple plan of salvation.

The plain reason why so many clergy and laymen alike get Bible repentance wrong is because they are looking at this whole thing from a carnal mindset. That is, from the unsaved man's perspective. In the mind of an unsaved man, it makes perfect sense that if you want to go to Heaven, you must turn away from your sinful ways. I mean, after all, it was our sins in the first place that got us into hot water, right? It appeals to the natural man that no one can go to Heaven unless you first commit to living a drastically changed life.

This is why Adam and Eve sewed together fig leaves to cover their nakedness in the Garden of Eden after eating the forbidden fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. In this 1956 sermon (when Pastor Jack Hyles was only 29 years old), he says that he thinks Eve was the one who sewed the fig leaves together to make clothes. That is interesting.

But the big problem with thinking that you must turn away from your sinning (or be willing to do so) is simply that NO ONE has ever turned from their sinning. NO ONE! You may clean up Mr. Pig with a nice bubble-bath, put some nice smelling perfume on the pig and a bow tie, but he is still a filthy pig and will run for the first nasty mudhole the moment that you release him.

Okay, here is what I want you to learn in this blog, which truth will settle this whole mess. So, don't miss this! It is the indwelling blessed gift of the Holy Spirit who produces a changed life (i.e., the “fruit” of the Spirit in our text verse); and NOT your sincere effort to turn from sin, to reform, to “be willing to turn from sin” (Chick Tracts), to live a changed life, to forsake a lifestyle of sinning, nor anything else to impress God with your filthy rags of self-righteousness!!! I hope you understood what I just wrote.

Let me say it again, it is the indwelling Holy Spirit (who is Jesus Christ living in and through every believer) who produces the “fruit” of the Spirit. Galatians 2:20, “I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.” So, you see dear friend, it is NOT you who produces a changed life when you get saved, it is Christ in you! This is such an important truth to grasp, so you will fully understand what is wrong with the whole concept of being required to “repent of your sins” (or to turn from your sinful bad habits) to be saved.

I bring up Pensacola Christian College (PCC) often in my writings, not to be mean or attack them, God forbid; but rather, to use their heresy as a canvas against which I can paint THE TRUTH. 1st Corinthians 11:19, “For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you.” PCC is very wrong on repentance and the Gospel, and by God's grace I am using their false teaching to help others.

PCC is wrong to teach that “Repentance is a change of mind resulting in a change of behavior.” That is carnal heresy! That statement attributes the change in a believer's life to SELF, instead of being produced by the indwelling HOLY SPIRIT. Do you see the difference? I hope you do, because the former is a corrupt plan of salvation, and the latter is the truth of a free grace Gospel.

In God's simple plan of salvation, you come to God as you are as a needy guilty sinner, and you simply accept Christ's sacrifice on the cross as full payment for your sins, believing that He was buried, but then resurrected from the dead three days later. This is the Gospel.

In PCC's corrupt plan of salvation, God will not save you unless you are first willing to forsake your sinful bad habits and self serving ways, to obey His will. According to assistant pastor Timothy Zacharias at Campus Church (which I heard him preach on July 21, 2021 at PCC), you must experience a profound hatred of your sins, and be willing to forsake them to be saved. And then once you've done that, put your trust in Jesus Christ. This is exactly what they teach at PCC and it is of the Devil, a counterfeit plan of salvation.

So, please remember dear reader, it is not YOU who produces the changes in your life after you get saved, it is the indwelling Holy Spirit. All of these incompetent pastors, clergy and missionaries today who foolishly teach that you must “repent of your sins” or “turn from sin with all your heart” to get to Heaven are LIARS! They are incompetent Bible students. They have removed the burden of sin from Christ's shoulders at Calvary's cross, and have instead laid those heavy burdens upon sinner's shoulders to bear the weight of their own sins.

A Letter From Pastor David Hoffman To Pastor David Baker About The 2009 KJB Summit

2026-04-18T09:37:00.003-05:00

John 6:63, “It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.”

The following open letter from Pastor David Hoffman was posted on the HACalumni dot com website (it no longer exists) for many years. I downloaded and preserved Pastor Baker's website for the next generation. I and Pastor David Baker are both grateful graduates of Hyles-Anderson College. We were both born in 1967 and graduated about the same time from college. Brother Hoffman and the late Dr. David Baker (1967-2024) have both been faithful pastors in Tennessee. I admire and thank God for these dear men.

In March of 2009, Pastor Jack Schaap CHANGED the long held position of the First Baptist Church of Hammond (and thus Hyles-Anderson College that the church owns and controls), declaring publicly at their annual Pastor's School that the King James Bible is no longer inspired. The fallout was swift and harsh from thousands of angry and concerned pastors, parents and churches worldwide. Dr. Schaap opened a can of worms!

In an attempt to save face, Pastor Jack Schaap hosted a King James Bible Summit in July of 2009, and many pastors wrote letters to share their opinion with Pastor David Baker, who led the resistance against Pastor Jack Schaap's false teachings. Here is Pastor Hoffman's letter:

I attended the King James Bible Summit that was hosted by Jack Schaap at Hyles-Anderson College. I was disappointed with them, but excited about the beloved King James Bible.

I have written a four page summary of the summit; of course, it is my slant.

King James Bible Summit
Pastor David Hoffman

Dr. Jack Schaap, pastor of the First Baptist Church of Hammond, Indiana, hosted a King James Bible Summit in the auditorium of Hyles-Anderson College on July 14, 2009. The summit was very organized and under the absolute control of Pastor Schaap and his men and rightfully so. The meeting was impressive and the opinions that were expressed by each speaker could have convinced any novice about this subject.

I personally received letters of invitation to attend and a personal telephone call. The letters implied there would be much time to ask questions. I had my doubts about the opportunity to ask questions, but I chose to attend anyway. Any question had to be written on a card and the leadership of the summit chose the questions to answer. The summit began at 9:00 am and ended at 5:00 pm with the answers for the questions during the final 26 minutes. My two questions were not chosen to be answered. The host and his staff are to be commended for their graciousness in providing three meals and much material at no cost to the attendees. I chose not to accept the meals, but I accepted the materials.

I listened intently and objectively and took copious notes throughout the summit. I observed several inconsistencies as I understand the issue of the perfection and inerrancy of the beloved King James Bible. The co-laborers and followers of Pastor Schaap will probably interpret my comments to be an attack upon him and his ministry. Brother Schaap can believe and preach as he wishes. When he proclaims his viewpoint to others, it is one’s obligation to "prove all things; hold fast that which is good," and "receive the word with all readiness of mind, and search the scriptures daily, whether those things were so."

People unfamiliar with the topic may have overlooked the subtle innuendos, half-truths, and inconsistencies of the speakers. I write these comments under the spirit of the admonishment of a brother (2 Thessalonians 3:14-15), but most likely the blindly loyal followers and co-laborers of Brother Schaap will consider the writer to be an enemy of their great work of God. So be it.

Psalm 12 was not mentioned once, but the actions of Psalm 12:2 were on full display. The typical fundamental Baptist credentials or verifications of rightness were demonstrated; such as, followers extolling the leadership, expressing the successes or numerical gains of the ministry, declaring the opinions of other great men, and mentioning the agreement amongst ourselves. Proverbs 18:17 says, "He that is first in his own cause seemeth just; but his neighbour cometh and searcheth him." Dr. Jack Schaap is the pastor of the largest fundamental Baptist church. One could believe that they are right by evidence of their great results. Are the speakers correct that only the originals were given by inspiration of God and the King James Version of the Bible is the divinely preserved translation of the inspired Word of God for English-speaking people?

Brother Schaap displayed an old King James Bible that he referred as the "she" Bible. The argument is one edition of the King James Bible said "he went into the city," and other editions said, "she went into the city." This purported problem is found in Ruth 3:15. This was one of my two questions that was not answered. My question was, "Which word is wrong (he or she) because the context reveals that BOTH went into the city (Ruth 4:1).

Several speakers of the ministry taught on varies subjects. Ted Speer taught on the subject, "What the Translators Said About Their Own Translation and Their Sources." I heard him ask this question, "Were the King James translators moved upon to write by inspiration of God like the prophets and apostles?" He wisely stated that the phrase "saith the Lord" occurred many times by the prophets. He wisely referenced several passages. His basic position was the translators did not say they were inspired; therefore, they were not inspired. Here’s the problem as I see it: Matthew, Mark, Luke, James, and Jude did not say they were inspired. Samuel, Nehemiah, Ezra, Elihu, David, Solomon, Jonah, and Habakkuk did not claim inspiration either, so are their words given by inspiration of God?

Bob Marshall taught on the subject, "Revisions and Editions." I heard him say inspiration and preservation is the work of God, but translation is the work of men. I also heard him say the Hebrew and Greek is the final authority and a translation cannot be the final authority. I also heard him say a translation cannot be without error. He mentioned leviathan of Job 41:1, but he did not know who or what it was. Why? No lexicon or dictionary reveals who leviathan is; in fact, Brother Bob in his answer to one question said that leviathan was some big terrible thing. The pure English words of Isaiah 27:1 reveal to any twelve-year-old child that leviathan is the natural state of Satan. How could he miss something so easy and clear in the pure English Bible? 1 Thessalonians 2:13 says, "For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because, when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe." The word of God works in the ones that believe. If the King James Bible is a work of men because it is a translation than it is not really believed to be the word of God.

I heard Daryl Moore say, "The Bible never claims inspiration to any translation." This is true, but the intent of the statement is to support a false premise. It is as true as the 80% truths of Satan when he tempted Eve. If the King James Bible is allowed to be the final authority, there are several examples where translation is the work of God and a translation can be without error; in fact, it can be better than the original. God translated the kingdom from Saul to David and David’s kingdom was better than Saul’s (2 Samuel 3:10). God translates the converted sinner into the kingdom of His dear Son and the born again believer is better than the original man of Adam (Colossians 1:13). God translated Enoch and Enoch was better after the translation (Hebrews 11:5).

But, lest I be considered a dumb thump for believing the words and example of the King James Bible let’s look at a translation from one language to another in the final authority. When the New Testament writer wrote, "It is written," it is a translation from Hebrew to Greek given by inspiration of God. Is the original Greek translation better than the original Hebrew? The New Testament translation of "the just shall live by his faith" in Habakkuk 2:4 is better in Romans 1:17 and Galatians 3:11. The New Testament translation of Deuteronomy 30:11-14 is better in Romans 10:5-8. When Paul spoke in Hebrew (Acts 22) and Luke recorded the speech in Greek, was the translation of Luke given by the inspiration of God? A Bible-believer concludes from the practice of the final authority that a translation can be given by inspiration of God.

Hypocrisy is revealed when men revere the Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament in the Septuagint. The Septuagint was an apostate translation and it could not have been written in 200 B.C. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia reveals that NO Apocryphal book was written prior to 170 B.C. and the rest were written from said time to 90 A.D. How did the Apocryphal books get into the LXX before they were written? Why do men revere said apostate translation, but do not glorify the King James Bible? Dare I write, "Hypocrisy"?

I heard Daryl Whitehouse say, "The Bible determines what to believe." Amen and amen, but what does he mean when he says, "The Bible." I can only conclude by the example of the speakers and the host of the summit that he means the original languages. All of their definitions of words came from dictionaries and lexicons. This is a classic case of he who defines the terms wins the argument. The word "inspiration" was defined by Brother Schaap in a publication (The Voice) that was mailed throughout the country and offered free at the summit. Brother Schaap claims to get his theology from God’s Word, but his sources for the definition of inspiration was three dictionaries and one lexicon. He who defines the term wins the argument.

My other question that was not chosen to be answered was, "Since the King James Bible is a self-interpreting Book, why was not Job 32:8 mentioned for the Bible definition of inspiration?" The word "inspiration" is clearly defined by its only other occurrence in the Bible. The usage of the word reveals its definition. Job 32:8 says, "But there is a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding." Noah Webster got the Scriptural definition right on the third definition of the 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language. The pure King James Bible defines inspiration to mean the infusion of ideas into the mind by the Holy Ghost (John 16:13). This is why all scripture IS given by inspiration of God (2 Timothy 3:15-17). It is present tense. Brother Schaap and company limited inspiration to the past originals. Preservation without inspiration is pointless. Fruit that is not preserved in its natural state is of little or no value. The fruit of the words of God is preserved with its in-spir-ation in the King James Bible.

Understanding of the truths of the pure Scriptures IS given by the inspiration of God today and IS profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness today. The giving of understanding to the spirit of the believer is through the Spirit of God (Romans 8:16). Is this too simple? Any humble child can believe and understand that the Author of Scripture is the Interpreter of the words of Scripture (Genesis 40:8; 1 Corinthians 2:9-16).

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. The Son is given to the sincere believer today. The same is true for the written word of God. Understanding of the Scriptures is given to the sincere believer without the scholarship of the original languages. When Phil Pins revealed his wonderful knowledge of the Greek language and his scholarly explanation of 2 Timothy 3:16, he subtly implied the phrase "is given" was referring to the originals in the past; however, said phrase is also in the great commission that is available to Brother Pins today while he wisely wins souls today.

1 Peter 5:1-4 reveals the opportunity to receive a crown of glory to the faithful shepherd who feeds the word of God to his people. There is a vital condition upon receiving the crown of glory in Proverbs 4:7-9. The crown of glory is only given to the faithful shepherd who gives glory and honour to whom it is due. Proverbs 4:7-9 says, "Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding. Exalt her, and she shall promote thee: she shall bring thee to honour, when thou dost embrace her. She shall give to thine head an ornament of grace: a crown of glory shall she deliver to thee." The crown of glory will be given to the shepherd who glorified the wisdom and understanding of the words of God. Psalm 138:2 says, "I will worship toward thy holy temple, and praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name." 2 Thessalonians 3:1 says, "Finally, brethren, pray for us, that the word of the Lord may have free course, and be glorified, even as it is with you." Praise and glory for personal understanding the words of God rightfully belongs to God the Spirit and the words of God (Genesis 41:15-16; Daniel 2:19-23; Luke 24:44-45; 1 Timothy 4:1; Revelation 3:17-22).

I heard Brother Schaap say that we should have a child-like interest in learning. Amen and amen. The source of the learning doesn’t matter to a child. A sincere and humble child believes truth from any source. Truth is truth no matter who says it and an error is an error no matter who says. Just prior to the lunch break I sadly heard Brother Schaap rail about two believers who are faithful to the words of God, but these two believers had been divorced and remarried. I heard him say the name "Ruckman" during this time, but I didn’t hear him say the name "Riplinger." I heard the dear brother piously say he would not mention her name, but Paul mentioned the names of heretics and people who forsook the faith under the inspiration of God. Anyone who has studied this issue knows the books and materials of Gail Riplinger. I heard Brother Schaap equated her to Mary Baker Eddy and Aimee McPherson, but the main difference though is neither of said women believed the words of God in the King James Bible.

I heard a comment that Dr. Jack Hyles did not attack his attackers, but I wonder if Dr. Jack Schaap’s comments about Riplinger would be considered an attack by his people. I heard him equate Gail Riplinger to Aimee McPherson. The insinuation is that believing the documentation of the books of Riplinger is like accepting Charismatic theology. Brother Schaap refuses to get his theology from a woman. I did knot know she had material that taught theology. I heard Brother Schaap say that men need to stay busy in the work of God and quit bickering and fighting. Amen and amen. Within that context he implied to build greater works than Jesus Christ (John 14:12). Does he think his work is greater than the Lord Jesus Christ’s work? That statement was addressed to the apostles. I’ve heard several Charismatics quote the same verse about their works. Now, who is acting like a Charismatic? Paul warned Timothy about men who think gain is godliness (1 Timothy 6:4-5). If gain is godliness, Obama and his Muslim friends have us all beat.

I heard Brother Jack mention that you pastors would not have a divorced man for a deacon; therefore, you should not get theology from divorced people. If divorce and remarriage discredits or disqualifies the author or preacher, than why does Brother Schaap sell Scofield Reference Bibles? C. I. Scofield was divorced and remarried. Will Brother Schaap discard all of the Scofield Reference Bibles in his ministry? Will Brother Schaap remove the Psalms of David and the Proverbs of Solomon because of their marriage problems? Will he remove the book of Hosea because he was divorced and remarried? Will he ignore God Himself because of God divorced Israel (Isaiah 50:1; Jeremiah 3:8)? Will he discredit the revival of Ezra 10 that began with several divorces? I think someone was feeling insecure during his diatribe against other believers in Christ. Truth is truth no matter who says it.

I appreciate the work of the host and his staff of the summit. Nothing that was said caused me to question my faith in the pure words of the King James Bible; in fact, my faith in the inerrancy of the 1611 Authorized King James Bible was verified again. By God’s grace I will continue to use, believe, and glorify said Bible fulfilling the work of God.

The Sin Of Christian Women Wearing Pants

2026-04-12T07:35:00.017-05:00

Proverbs 7:10, “And, behold, there met him a woman with the attire of an harlot, and subtil of heart.”

It is a wicked SIN for Christian women to wear pants according to the Holy Bible. Deuteronomy 22:5, “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.”

Pastor Brad Moffett in April of 2025 dismissed this passage as mere ceremonial law. What an incompetent FOOL! Clearly, God's COMMAND for women not to wear men's clothing was a MORAL LAW. Don't anger God by saying that it's not. Only a wicked pastor would skirt 1st Timothy 2:9 about MODEST APPAREL to sanction his worldly wife wearing her provocative pants to a church picnic. SHAME on Family Baptist Church in Pensacola at 5454 W. Mobile Highway!

Only an incompetent ungodly ignoramus for a Baptist pastor would dare defend his worldly wife's RIGHT to wear men's clothing, provoking LUST in the souls of men struggling with lust (1st Peter 2:11). SHAME on wicked pastors' Bobby and Brad Moffett and their ungodly spoiled brat wives at the Family Baptist Church in Pensacola!

You have blood on your hands!!! I am sick and tired of ungodly unrepentant sinners (religious leaders) in the churches attempting to justify wickedness in the name of Jesus. 1st Timothy 2:9-10, “In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.”

Jeremiah 7:8-10, “Behold, ye trust in lying words, that cannot profit. Will ye steal, murder, and commit adultery, and swear falsely, and burn incense unto Baal, and walk after other gods whom ye know not; And come and stand before me in this house, which is called by my name, and say, We are delivered to do all these abominations?”

Tragically, neo-evangelicals don't care! So, just go ahead you female rebels, wear your wicked pants at Family Baptist Church in Pensacola, but know this: “that for all these things God will bring thee into judgment” (Ecclesiastes 11:9b).

Beware Of The Satanic Lutheran Religion

2026-04-02T18:43:00.000-05:00

Galatians 1:6-8, “I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.”

Martin Luther (1483-1546) was NOT a born again Christian. The man taught Sacramental Salvation his entire life until his death. There is no evidence that Mr. Luther ever repented of his damnable false teachings to be saved. No one is saved who trusts in sacraments.

So, what do Lutherans believe about Baptism? There’s no better place to go for an answer than Luther’s Small Catechism, which is how Lutherans have been poisoning their children for almost five hundred years. Here’s the heretical quote:

It [baptism] works forgiveness of sins, rescues from death and the devil, and gives eternal salvation to all who believe this, as the words and promises of God declare. (Baptism, Second Part)

BLASPHEMY!!! The repentant thief on the cross was never baptized, yet Jesus promised that they would together be in Paradise that same day (Luke 23:43).

The Apostle Paul said in 1st Corinthians 1:17, “For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.” Paul never would have made such a bold statement if water baptism were mandatory for salvation.

No saint in the Old Testament was water baptized, yet Acts 10:43 teaches that they were all saved by faith in Christ, the same as we are today in the New Testament.

The same Apostle John who penned the Gospel of John under inspiration to show us how to get to Heaven (John 20:31), also penned the Epistle of 1st John to help us know that we are saved (1st John 5:13). Yet, not once does John ever mention water baptism in his epistle. Certainly if water baptism were required and essential to be born again, John would have mentioned it with urgency.

I have given you some solid biblical reasons for rejecting the heresy of Baptismal Regeneration. Martin Luther was a damnable heretic concerning God's simple plan of salvation. Lutherans (who follow the teachings of Martin Luther) are not saved. If you are a Lutheran, kindly said, please leave that deadly personality cult.

The Deception Of Feminism

2026-03-26T14:09:00.063-05:00

Genesis 2:18, “And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.”

Ephesians 5:22, “Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.”

1st Timothy 2:11-12, “Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.”

I heard a tremendous sermon today by Evangelist Raymond Cooper titled, 'The Deception Of Feminism,' which I highly encourage you to listen to friend. This is great truth!

To begin, let me kindly say in all holiness that I love and admire women. A woman is the greatest and most precious creature that God ever made. I wouldn't want to live in a world without females. That being said, there's nothing as ugly as a woman who has become a feminist. According to 1st Samuel 15:23, feminism is equal to Satanism, on par with witchcraft and idolatry, “For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, he hath also rejected thee from being king.” In God's sight, a rebellious wife is in the same boat as a witch!

Feminism is NOT a good thing, it is corrupt. The first wave of feminism in America happened between 1848 and 1920, the year in which women were allowed to start voting. The second wave of feminism began in 1960 with the birth control pill. The invention of modern birth control caused major adverse changes to U.S. society which took of in the 1960s:

The normalization of fornication
Delayed marriages
Smaller family sizes
Higher rates of female college attendance
Higher rates of women in the workforce
Economic independence
Cohabitation without marriage (shacking up with your girlfriend)

The wicked argument was that women being pregnant all the time held them back from prospering in the workplace. Well, amen, that is how God intended for things to be. 1st Timothy 5:14-15, “I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully. For some are already turned aside after Satan.”

Many historians document that early female political activism in the United States led to drastic changes in our culture. During the 1920s in the United States there was a visible cultural shift in urban society called. “The New Woman.” Females during this time period of history started wearing their hair shorter, wearing shorter dresses and pants, wearing makeup, smoking and drinking publicly, Jazz dancing and nightlife, they started informal dating instead of having formal courtship periods. During WWI millions of women went to work. This trend took off exponentially in World War II.

Abortion: The Ultimate Evil Expression Of Feminism

By the 1960s second wave feminism took off, which was of the Devil. Birth control was popularized and the abortion industry followed. God will NEVER bless the United States while we continue to murder our children by abortion. Sadly, it is a fact that there have been more abortions since Roe vs. Wade was overturned in 2022, than before it was overturned. There were about 930,000 abortions in 2020. There were about the same number of abortions in 2022. In 2023, there were was well over one million abortions. In 2024, there were approximately1.5 million abortions in the United States! Today, two-thirds of all abortions are done by eating a pill. Feminist activists are pulling on the same rope as the Devil.

Dear reader, abortion is premediated cold-blooded murder! Tens of millions of innocent lives in the United States have been lost (murdered), just so that selfish irresponsible women can go out and have a career, live the nightclub single life, and be a bar-hopping harlot. Thankfully, there is a God in Heaven to whom we must all give account one day in eternity (Ecclesiastes 12:13-14; Romans 14:10-12; Hebrews 4:13). Everything that is wrong with women today is tied to feminism. Pastor's wives wearing their ungodly immodest pants is rooted in the evils of feminism. SHAME on any professed Christian woman who wears pants in public!

Another big reform pushed by feminists was easy divorce. In 1969, ungodly California Governor Ronald Reagan signed the nation's first “No Fault Divorce” policy into law. Adultery is no longer a punishable crime in America. All punishments have been removed from the lawbooks. In Maryland today adultery is legally punishable by a $10 fine. What a shameful mockery of God's law! Whereas God's Old Testament law requires the death penalty for adultery (Leviticus 20:10; Deuteronomy 22:22), the state of Maryland thinks adultery is a laughing matter to be made fun of. Woe unto the leaders of Maryland on Judgment Day.

Third wave feminism pushed heavily for the homosexualization of America in the 1990's through the early 2000's. The U.S. mainstream media and Hollywood were instrumental in promoting the sodomite agenda. Feminist witches are trying to corrupt families and destroy society. Everything that Bible believing fundamentalist Christians are against, wicked feminists support. We are living in the fourth wave of feminism today, which is being run by Satanists!

We are now living in the fourth wave of feminism in America. Fourth-wave feminism began around 2012 and is characterized by a focus on the empowerment of women. According to feminist Rosemary Clark-Parsons, digital platforms have allowed feminist movements to become more connected and visible, allowing activists to reach a global audience and act on it in real time. The evils of fourth wave of feminism seeks greater gender equality by focusing on gendered norms and the marginalization of women in society. In so doing, fools like Rosemary Clark-Parsons total disregard the inspired Holy Bible!

Ungodly Feminist Wives Destroy Their Family

Feminism promotes feminist ideologies: fornication, birth control, abortion, the love of money, career women, the sinful nightclub life, childlessness, debt, worldly attire, et cetera. Dear reader, I cannot warn everyone enough about the dangers of feminist ideologies. We are living in a toxic society today in America! Ungodly advice exists everywhere!

The inspired Holy Bible tells us that Jezebel stirred up her husband Ahab against the LORD. 1st Kings 21:25, “But there was none like unto Ahab, which did sell himself to work wickedness in the sight of the LORD, whom Jezebel his wife stirred up.” Ultimately, dogs licked up the dying blood of both wicked Ahab and his trashy evil wife Jezebel.

In the tragic story of Haman in the book of Esther, we read that his wicked wife gave him some very bad advice, which ultimately resulted in Haman and all 10 of their sons being hung. Haman kept complaining at home that Mordecai (an innocent Jew) refused to bow down to worship him. So, Haman's wife Zeresh wickedly suggested that Haman build a gallows 75 feet tall to hand the Mordecai upon...

Esther 5:14, “Then said Zeresh his wife and all his friends unto him, Let a gallows be made of fifty cubits high, and tomorrow speak thou unto the king that Mordecai may be hanged thereon: then go thou in merrily with the king unto the banquet. And the thing pleased Haman; and he caused the gallows to be made.”

Haman's wife lived to rue the day she ever opened her stupid mouth...

Es:9:13-14, “Then said Esther, If it please the king, let it be granted to the Jews which are in Shushan to do tomorrow also according unto this day's decree, and let Haman's ten sons be hanged upon the gallows. And the king commanded it so to be done: and the decree was given at Shushan; and they hanged Haman's ten sons.”

Oh foolish feminist woman!

Women Should Not Be Teaching The Bible

Revelation 2:19-21, “I know thy works, and charity, and service, and faith, and thy patience, and thy works; and the last to be more than the first. Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols. And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not.”

The inspired Holy Bible teaches that women are more vulnerable and susceptible to demonic deception, which is why they need to be in subjection to male authority. That is why I preach against Miss Renee Roland on YouTube, who has tens of thousands of followers (victims). She is making tons of money begging for money donations. Sadly, she denies the biblical truth of a burning Hell where Christ rejecters will spend eternity. Renee is in big trouble with God.

The Apostle Paul refused to even allow women to teach, the way it should be...

1st Timothy 2:11-14, “Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.”

In the Garden of Eden, Eve was the first woman to have an interaction with an angel Lucifer...

1st Corinthians 11:6-10, “For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man. For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.”

False prophets (bad messengers like the serpent in Eden) are going to lead women astray, and that is why they need to have power (authority) over their head, signified by wearing long hair and head coverings (I admire Arab women who wear burkas). The Bible commands women not to be put into power. Women will destroy the people they lead. ...

2nd Timothy 3:5-7, “Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.”

In 1st Timothy 5:14-15 we read that career women are already turned aside after Satan, the same wicked angel (Lucifer) who led Eve astray in the Garden of Eden. Whenever there is a power vacuum (lack of authority) over a woman's head (her thinking), the worst influences will fill that void. God pity the woman who has no man to look up to for spiritual guidance, love, strength and leadership. Genesis 3:16b, “and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.” Satan is working every step of the way behind the evil feminist's agenda in America. Please RUN from feminist garbage ladies!!!

The real deception of feminism is promising women liberty but bringing them into bondage. The deception of feminism is calling it “feminism” in the first place; it should be called SATANISM!!! Calling female rebellion “feminism” is the same as your greedy credit card bank printing the word “FREEDOM” on your credit card. Credit cards should have a scorpion with a tail stinger displayed. Feminism is a liberal wicked agenda. Feminism enslaves women! Satan is at the helm of the feminist women's rights movement!

Women need power (authority) over their head, lest they be led astray and deceived by false prophets. 2nd Peter 2:18-19, “For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error. While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.”

We live in a throw away culture where over 95% of people will give you ungodly counsel that the best decision you can make as a wife in a troubled marriage is to get a divorce. Psalm 1:1a, “Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly...” Women's shelters today are a spiritually dangerous place for women to be. God only knows how many millions of women have filed for divorce because of being given ungodly advice, and provided a free pro bono scumbag attorney which she obtained through some accursed women's shelter. The inspired Holy Bible warns saints against taking advice from heathens! Jeremiah 10:2, “Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them.”

Tragically, many rebellious Christian wives today might as well shave their head bald and get some tattoos which read “PURE EVIL” on their 8 finger knuckles, because that is the spiritual condition of their wicked heart. We've all seen weird women today who have a crew cut with green hair that looks like a tennis ball, ripped out knees on their blue jeans, looking pathetic and disheveled like something that a cat wouldn't even drag into the house off the street. The Devil loves to kill, steal and destroy everything that he possibly can (John 10:10).

Feminism is Satanism! It is female rebellion against God-ordained male authority. Like it or not ladies, God ordained that only men should lead society, the church, the family and the marriage. If you disagree with that biblical truth, take it up with God. Like I said earlier, I love all you ladies and thank God for you, but God made you to fulfil a role as a HELP MEET to your husband; not a help meet to your pastor, nor your brother, nor your employer at work, nor your neighbour, nor your father, but ONLY to your husband!

Please don't fall for the demonic deception of feminism, which was corrupt from the beginning.

Pastor R. A. Torrey's Damnable Repentance Heresy

2026-03-14T18:42:00.002-05:00

Acts 2:38, “Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.”

One of the greatest religious leaders of the early 20th century was Reuben Archer Torrey (1856-1928). He was commonly known as “R.A. Torrey,” an American evangelist, pastor, educator, and writer. Called by Dwight L. Moody to head Bible institute in Chicago (now Moody Bible Institute). Certainly, Dwight Moody was a mighty man and preacher, and I recognize him as a hero of the Christian faith. My favorite of all the Moody Memorial Church pastors was Harry A. Ironside (1876-1951). Dr. Ironside pastored Moody Memorial Church between 1930-1948. Dr. Torrey joined Dwight L. Moody in his evangelistic work in Chicago in 1889, and became superintendent of the Bible Institute of the Chicago Evangelization Society (now Moody Bible Institute).

Dr. R.A. Torrey was unquestionably sincere, but as all men, he was imperfect in his theology. I have never found one man, neither living or dead, who was without some doctrinal error. Only God's Words are infallible, perfect, inspired, inerrant and divinely preserved. I believe those divinely inspired preserved words to be the King James Bible for the English-speaking world.

Having said that, I must expose what I believe to be doctrinal error in R.A. Torrey's “WHAT THE BIBLE TEACHES,” in which he states:

“II. What Is Repentance?

(1) THE ETYMOLOGY OF THE WORD USED:

The primary thought of the Hebrew word translated 'repent' in the Old Testament is, to pant, to sigh, to groan, and so to lament, to grieve, to grieve about one's doing. ... The Greek word in the New Testament translated 'repent' means 'To change one's mind.'

The same Greek word is used in the LXX for the Hebrew word mentioned above. So its New Testament meaning is to be determined by this Old Testament usage. There is another Greek word used in the New Testament five times and translated 'repent.' This word means, 'it is a care to one afterwards,' —i.e., it 'repents one.' This word is also used in the LXX for the Hebrew word mentioned above. The thought of both sorrow and change of purpose is in the words.”

SOURCE: Pastor R.A. Torrey, “What The Bible Teaches,” p. 353; ©1898, Fleming H. Revell Company

Contrary to what many believers have wrongly been taught, the “Septuagint” is of the Devil. The word “Septuagint” means “70” (or Roman Numeral “LXX”). Between the Old and New Testament, allegedly 70 scholars translated the Old Testament Hebrew into Greek, but this is a myth. The “Septuagint” (LXX) Is A Hoax! Beware Of The Septuagint, Which Is Corrupted Alexandrian Text (it was fabricated in Alexandria, Egypt). The King James Bible is based upon the Masoretic Hebrew text.

Evangelist David W. Daniel's exposes the fraudulent Septuagint:

But do we Christians need the Alexandrian manuscripts? Not at all! For the Old Testament we have the Preserved Words of God in the Hebrew Masoretic text. For the New Testament we have the 5,000-plus manuscripts in Greek, plus the many early translations spread abroad, to witness to the actual words of Christ and His apostles.

So the Septuagint story is a hoax. It was not written before Christ; so it was not used by Jesus or His apostles. It is the only set of manuscripts to include the Apocrypha mixed in with the books of the Bible, so as to justify the Roman Catholic inclusion of them in their Bibles. And it is just those same, perverted Alexandrian codices—the same ones that mess up the New Testament—dressed up in pretty packaging.

Let's stick to our preserved Bible, the King James Bible in English, and leave the Alexandrian perversions alone.

SOURCE: Dr. David W. Daniel's; What Is The Septuagint?

Dr. Torrey gets into hot water doctrinally with the following embellishment of the word “repent”:

“In the usage of the words the thought of regret, and the thought of change of purpose and action, are both found; but the emphasis is upon the change of purpose and action, especially in the first New Testament word mentioned above. In our day there is a danger of underestimating the importance of sorrow for sin. Sorrow for sin is not repentance, but it is an element in repentance. What the repentance or change of mind is about must be determined by the context. Repentance for sin is such a sorrow for sin or abhorrence of sin, such a change of mind about it, as leads the sinner to turn away from it with all his heart.”

SOURCE: Dr. R.A. Torrey; “What The Bible Teaches,” p. 355; ©1898, Fleming H. Revell Company

That is heresy!!! Dr. Torrey is wrong on the subject of repentance. It is a false Gospel to tell unsaved people that they must feel “sorrow” for their sins to be saved. This is the English meaning of the word repent, not the Biblical Greek meaning. Mr. Torrey foolishly attempts to embellish the meaning of repentance from being “a change of mind” to being “a change of life,” by overlaying the New Testament with the Old Testament. That's like comparing green beans to coconuts. The word “repent” in the Old Testament is never used concerning salvation. The word “repent” is mentioned 45 times in the Old Testament. At least 40 of those times, repent refers to God and not man. That fact speaks volumes!!! There is no connection between the word “repent” and salvation in the Old Testament.

The only requirement to BELIEVE THE GOSPEL is to repent (think differently) about whatever has been hindering you from believing the Gospel. A person is born-again the very moment that they BELIEVE. 1st Corinthians 1:21, “For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.” The idea of turning away from sins as a prerequisite to placing one's faith in the Gospel is totally unbiblical. You cannot show me even one mention in the Holy Bible that says to “turn from sins” or “repent of sins” to be saved. This includes the Old Testament. In nearly every mention of the word “repent” in the Old Testament, it is God that is God doing the repenting, not man.

Deep Sorrow For Sin, Regret And Hatred Of it, Are Not Requirements To Believe The Gospel

The idea of repentance being a deep sorrow for sin, and regret over past actions, and a purpose to turn away from it, is not a requirement to receive the free gift of God, which is eternal life. The following is heresy taught by Pastor Torrey, the same wrong meaning of repentance as espoused by Roman Catholicism...

“Repentance for sin is such a sorrow for sin or abhorrence of sin, such a change of mind about it, as leads the sinner to turn away from it with all his heart.”

SOURCE: Dr. R.A. Torrey; “What The Bible Teaches,” p. 355; ©1898, Fleming H. Revell Company

I do not agree with the unbiblical use of sacraments in the Episcopal Church. However, the following explanation of metanoia by Episcopal Pastor Eli Brayley is superbly written, with which I agree wholeheartedly:

Simply put, metanoia is a word filled with remarkable meaning by the preaching of Christ and the apostles. It is not a word that comes replete with it's own meaning. The English word "repentance", on the other hand, comes filled with it's own meaning - it needs no supplementation by context. Repentance means to feel remorse or regret for your sins; it's Latin root literally means "pain; suffering in view of being liable to punishment". Metanoia has no such meaning associated with it. The word is Greek, and it is made up of two words: meta & nous. Meta means "after" or "change", and nous is the Greek word for "mind". The word means "after-mind" and signifies a change of mind: thinking one way, but then afterwards thinking another. It is the opposite of pronoia (pro-nous) which means before-mind: the mind or thinking you have before. Interestingly, there is another Greek word we frequently use in English that is related to metanoia: it is paranoia (para-nous). Literally, the word means to be beside-mind, or we would say "out of your mind", or "beside yourself." Paranoia is not being in a right mind, but having a mind that is off center - that is, not where it should be. If you compare metanoia and paranoia together, you get the idea of what the New Testament call for metanoia is: it is a command to change your mind and get it where it should be.

Of course, metanoia, when used as a command ("change your mind") needs supplementation by context; it needs to be filled with more information because we need to know what we are supposed to change our mind about. It can be something small (metanoia about how to spell "judgment"), to something enormously large (metanoia about your religious worldview). The sky is the limit with metanoia, and that is precisely the point of the remarkable function of the word in the New Testament. It is not restricted, like "repentance", to a narrow meaning of pain and sorrow for sin, which we then have to force unnaturally to fit with the gospel. It is a change of mind unto the gospel itself.

The gospel is what the change of mind is about. The preaching of Jesus and the apostles speaks to the nous and men change or don't change their mind as they hear it. When a man changes his mind at the preaching of the gospel, he has experienced metanoia. Thus, the proclamation of metanoia at the beginning of the New Testament is the doorway into the entire rest of the doctrine of the New Testament: Change your mind! About what? Listen! A radical mindshift in the religious world is about to happen... no, it is happening now... What we thought about God and the law and righteousness and forgiveness is all about to change. Hear! Metanoia and believe the gospel!

New Testament metanoia is a divine call to a radical mind-shift in the way men think about religion. Therefore "repentance" is an entirely unsatisfactory translation of the amazing word "metanoia" which gives a completely different feeling to the preaching of Jesus and His apostles. Was the major proclamation of Jesus and the apostles "Repent! Feel sorry for your sins"? Or was it "Metanoia! Think a new way"!

Do you see what a difference these two words make? Which one is in keeping with the gospel of grace as we know it from the New Testament? Not the first, but the second. The gospel calls us to a new way of thinking about religion. Whereas men think that they are good, and that obedience to the law is the way of salvation, and that the law only requires partial obedience, and that most people won't perish, Jesus calls us to believe that there is none good, and that no one will be saved by obedience to the law, because the law requires perfect obedience, and that broad is the road that leads to destruction.

The apostles call us to believe that the cross of Christ is the power and the wisdom of God, the only way whereby we are saved, and live, through faith, while the world thinks that the cross is foolishness. Which word best summarizes this kind of preaching: "repent", or "metanoia"? Certainly not the first, but the second.

SOURCE: The Great Meaning Of Metanoia

Amen, that is 100% accurate and biblical.

In sharp contrast, Pastor R.A. Torrey does what false prophets typically do. That is, he begins by making a true statement, but then subtly builds from that truthfully statement an entire system of falsehood and heresy. False prophets will come at you with a word salad. Dr. Torrey begins by defining repentance correctly as “a change of mind,” but then he makes the following heretical exaggerated false claim:

“In the usage of the words the thought of regret, and the thought of change of purpose and action, are both found; but the emphasis is upon the change of purpose and action, especially in the first New Testament word mentioned above. In our day there is a danger of underestimating the importance of sorrow for sin. Sorrow for sin is not repentance, but it is an element in repentance. What the repentance or change of mind is about must be determined by the context. Repentance for sin is such a sorrow for sin or abhorrence of sin, such a change of mind about it, as leads the sinner to turn away from it with all his heart.”

SOURCE: Dr. R.A. Torrey; “What The Bible Teaches,” p. 355; ©1898, Fleming H. Revell Company

Dr. Torrey wrongly assumes that repentance is a change of mind about sinful bad habits. That is the English understanding of what it means to “repent,” not the Greek word “metanoia.” Effectively, R.A. Torrey is teaching the heresy of Lordship Salvation.

We Are Saved By God's Imputed Righteousness

But we do read in Genesis 15:6 that Abraham's faith was imputed (counted) for righteousness. Genesis 15:6, “And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.” This is the Gospel. The Gospel is not predicated by turning away from sinful behavior as Dr. Torrey errantly teaches. I mean no unkindness to Dr. Torrey, but the Gospel as defined in the Bible does not require forsaking the world, ceasing from sinful bad habits, nor following Jesus as the “Lord” of one's life. None of these constitute the Gospel.

As appealing as R.A. Torrey's teachings on repentance may be, the Biblical doctrine of IMPUTATION exposes Mr. Torrey as a false prophet. Romans 4:5-6, “But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works.” The word “counted” in Romans 4:5 comes from the same exact Greek word, logizomai, as “impute” in verse 6. A man's faith is IMPUTED for righteousness!!! This totally leaves out the concept of turning away from sins to be saved.

Granted, the entire reason for God saving a man is to liberate him from the chains of sin, and the power of darkness. Colossians 1:13, “Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son.” God saves believers UNTO GOOD WORKS, not BY GOOD WORKS. Ephesians 2:10, “For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.”

Please don't get the wrong idea that I think Christians have God's permission to live in habitual sin, because we don't (Romans 3:31); but if a believer does choose to live in deliberate sin, their eternal security is not in jeopardy (as Evangelists Ray Comfort and Paul Washer falsely teach). This is why there are two separate judgments: one for believers (2nd Corinthians 5:9-11) and another for unbelievers (Revelation 20:11-15). Jesus died for our sins on the cross.

We've been bought with a price, and that “price” is the precious blood of Jesus. 1st Corinthians 6:20, “For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.” If you are a born-again believer, you completely belong to God. We ought to live for the Lord as believers. However, regardless of how we choose to live our life, eternal life is a free gift. The two are not related. Salvation and Discipleship are two separate matters.

It is gross theological incompetence for Bible teachers to turn Romans 10:9 into a requirement to be saved. Of all the hundreds of references in the New Testament to believing the Gospel to be saved, only once in Romans 10:9 do we read anything about “confession” being related to salvation. I have found umpteen websites which require “confessing 'Jesus is Lord'” to be saved. This is a false Gospel. Whereas the King James Bible correctly says, “That if though shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus,” the corrupted New International Version (NIV) says, “That if you confess with your mouth, 'Jesus is Lord'.” This is the corrupted Alexandrian text of Satan. The Bible does not require declaring Jesus as one's Lord to be saved. This is works. Many of today's preachers are caught between grace and works.

The Bible gives us clear evidence that it is possible to BELIEVE THE GOSPEL and still refuse to confess Christ. This plainly teaches us that salvation does not require confession. Romans 10:9 is often taken out of context. It is improper Bible exegesis to lift a Bible verse out of context and base a doctrine of just one passage of Scripture.

John 12:42-43, “Nevertheless among the chief rulers also many believed on him; but because of the Pharisees they did not confess him, lest they should be put out of the synagogue: For they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God.” Anybody who teaches that a person must “confess Jesus” to be saved is teaching heresy. The chief rulers who believed were saved, but “THEY DID NOT CONFESS HIM” (John 12:42-43).

Beware Of The False Doctrine Of Zionism

2026-03-07T11:51:00.002-06:00

Luke 21:24, “And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.”

Israel could be attacked and nuked tomorrow and it would be biblical. The inspired Holy Bible does not guarantee any special divine protection from God during the Times Of The Gentiles, as our text Scripture passage plainly teaches from the book of Luke. The Times Of The Gentiles will be fulfilled at the Second Coming of Jesus Christ (which will happen after the 7-year Tribulation period), the stone cut out of the mountain in king Nebuchadnezzar's image which he saw in a dream (Daniel 2:45).

As a born again Christian, and as an independent fundamentalist Baptist, I stand against present-day manmade Israel. I am sick and tired of hearing brainwashed Zionists in churches misinterpreting Genesis 12:3, “And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.” This promise was exclusively for Abraham alone. This very does NOT apply to all Jews of all time.

We know this to be true because of passages such as Exodus 19:5-6, “Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine: And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel.” Please don't miss that all-important preposition “if,” meaning that God's promises to bless the Jews have always been CONDITIONAL upon their continued faith and obedience. God's promises have always followed a line of faith.

That is why I reject the modern teaching of Replacement Theology, because there was never anything to replace. From the very beginning, God cursed disobedient Jews, He did not bless them (cf. Deuteronomy chapter 28). Israel is Israel and the Church is the Church. That is what I humbly believe. "THE CHOSEN" today include all (and only) born again believers, comprised of Jews and Gentiles alike (Galatians 3:26-29). No unsaved Jew who rejects Jesus as the Messiah will ever enter into The Promised Land, nor into Heaven. Only a born again Jew is of the seed of Abraham in God's sight (Romans 2:28-29).

When the arrogant self-righteous Pharisees boasted of their Jewish ancestry, John the Baptist told them "big deal," God could raise up stones as the children of Abraham if He wanted to do so. Matthew 3:9, “And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.” The fact they were Jewish meant absolutely NOTHING to God. The LORD is not a respecter of persons (Romans 10:12). Hebrews 11:6 says that without faith it is IMPOSSIBLE to please God, and that includes every human being, regardless of one's ancestry, heritage or ethnicity. The United States is falling apart today on many levels. We certainly have NOT been blessed for supporting the manmade farce called" Israel" in Palestine.

Evangelist John R. Rice (1895-1980) did NOT think that present-day Israel is the fulfillment of Bible prophecy, and neither do I. And neither did Pastor J. Vernon McGee (1904-1988). Israel today is no different than any other heathen nation. According to Hosea 3:4-5, the true nation of Israel won't be restored until the Jews repent toward God when Jesus Christ returns. The legitimate nation of Israel has not existed since 586 BC when Jerusalem was annihilated, enslaved and conquered by Babylon. Since 70 AD, due to Roman persecution and annihilation, the Jews have been scattered throughout the world.

And although 7 million Jews have returned to Palestine since 1948, they have not yet returned unto the LORD. When the Man of Sin (Antichrist, or “in place of Christ”) comes, the Jews and Arabs alike will embrace him as their False Messiah. The future Antichrist (aka, the Beast) will deceive the whole world according to Revelation 12:9. If it were possible, he would even deceive God's children, the elect (Matthew 24:24).

Beware of the deceptive evils of Zionist propaganda which have crept into most churches today. Our focus as believers in these last day should be upon preaching the Gospel of the Kingdom to the world, and not upon the future Kingdom of Israel. It is idolatry to idolize the nation of Israel and the Jews. Since God has rejected and cursed the Jews (Romans 11:23-24), we ought not bid them Godspeed (2nd John 1:11). God in His mercy has made a way back to the Olive Tree (the promises of God) for any Jews, which is only through faith in Jesus Christ (Galatians 3:26-29). Thank you for reading my ministry blog. Jesus is precious!!!

What About The New IFB Teaching That You Must Pray To Be Saved?

2026-03-02T11:48:00.000-06:00

John 3:16, “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”

Kindly, I respectfully disagree with Pastor Steven L. Anderson that prayer is the Bible method to be saved, but he has a right to his own opinion as a fundamentalist Bible preacher, which I respect. I love Brother Anderson and he is a ministry friend. It is not damnable heresy as some try to make it. Brother Onorato Diamante on YouTube is also my ministry friend, and I support his soul-winning ministry. In this theological debate, I side with Onorato.

Pastor Jack Hyles taught us to use a Sinner's Prayer at Hyles-Anderson College, which is how I was taught. But Dr. Hyles also made it clear that you don't have to pray to be saved.

Furthermore, Evangelist Bob Jones Sr. (1883-1968), or simply “Dr. Bob” as friends and students called him, rightly taught that you don't have to pray to get to Heaven...

“'Pray to be saved. Ask the Lord to save you.' This is what I heard a minister say to a convicted sinner who came forward for prayer at the close of an evangelistic service. Nowhere in the Bible are men told to pray to be saved. There are examples where men did pray and were saved. Men are told to repent, to believe, to obey the Gospel, but the Bible never says to pray for salvation. It does say that whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved, but nowhere does the Bible command men to pray to be saved. I think I know why, God, who made the human heart, knew that it was not necessary to tell convicted sinners to pray. If a sinner can see Jesus Christ on the cross, it is as natural for him to pray as it is for birds to sing or flowers to bloom. 'Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved.'” —Dr. Bob Jones Sr., “Comments On Here And Hereafter,” chapter titled: 'Prayer And Praise,' p. 163; Bob Jones University Press, Inc., © 1942

Bravo Dr. Bob!

Furthermore, several years ago I heard Pastor Anderson say in a sermon that if anyone says he doesn't believe you can be saved by faith alone without prayer, they are a liar. He simply believes that calling upon the name of the Lord in prayer is the Bible method of winning souls. This does not in any way negate the saving power of the Gospel.

That being said, I am concerned that using a Sinner's Prayer might confuse some people, but that is only my personal experience and opinion. When I got saved at age 12, I needlessly struggled with the assurance of my salvation for the next 10 years, because no one had ever showed me from the Bible that I could be saved by simply believing the Gospel. I kept worrying what I had prayed, and since I couldn't remember, it drove me crazy.

And even though I prayed at least 50 times over those years for God to save me, I still couldn't find any peace in the matter because no one had ever shown me the true simple Gospel, which is salvation by faith in Jesus' death on the cross, burial and His bodily resurrection, apart from all human effort. But it wasn't until I read Pastor Max Younce's helpful book, "Salvation And The Public Invitation" that I finally found the sweet peace that I am saved. Dr. Younce's book SOLIDIFIED my salvation beliefs.

Faithful Word Baptist Church won 10,121 lost souls to Christ over the past year (Pastor Anderson personally led 182 sinners to faith in Christ). Amen and amen! It would be folly to say that none of those people got saved because they were led in a Sinner's Prayer. I led many people to Christ using a Sinner's Prayer in my early ministry days. But I stopped using it many years ago for the aforementioned reasons.

I will say this, it is VERY normal for a person to want to pray a Sinner's Prayer to accompany their faith. I did at age 12. I silently called out to God in my heart to save me, and He graciously did at age 12. I believe people are saved before they ever open their mouth to pray, or walk down a church aisle, because it is the heart's faith that saves a sinner, and not their behavioral responses (Romans 10:9-10). I believe that 95% of sinners instinctively pray a Sinner's Prayer at the time of conversion. This is fine and not wrong to do.

That all being said, I think it is paramount that Bible preachers emphasis that we are saved by faith alone without having to pray, call or ask to be saved. I once heard Pastor Bob Gray Sr. rightly say that Jesus doesn't forgive sin. Jesus has already paid for everyone's sins with His precious blood. I love that! So, all someone needs to do to be saved is to simply by faith (taking God at His written Word) accept Christ's sacrifice on the cross as full payment for their sins, believing that Christ was buried but is now risen, to be saved. It's that easy to go to Heaven.

You don't have to ask to receive a gift that is freely being offered to you, you simply just take it. Eternal life is a "free gift" according to Romans 5:15-18, 6:23 and Ephesians 2:8-9. JESUS PAID IT ALL, all I have to do to receive God's free gift is BELIEVE that Jesus did it all for me through Calvary's cross 2,000 years ago.

One final word, I am aware that some New IFB pastors (e.g., Jonathan Shelley in Texas) insist that you must pray to be saved, which is blatant heresy! Yet, as I mentioned in this blog, Pastor Steven Anderson does not teach that. He has plainly said that it is possible for someone to be saved by faith alone without saying a Sinner's Prayer, but he simply chooses to always use a Sinner's Prayer in his church's soul-winning efforts. Each pastor is different.

Salvation Heresies Of Pastor J. Harold Smith

2026-02-26T16:17:00.004-06:00

Dr. J. Harold Smith (1910–2001) was a dynamic Southern Baptist evangelist and pastor. He was the founder of the 'Radio Bible Hour' in 1935. Here is a short bizarre excerpt from Pastor J. Harold Smith's (1910-2001) sermon, “God's Three Deadlines.” There are numerous Scriptural problems with Dr. Smith's preaching:

You don't get saved by “giving your heart to Jesus.” That is simply not the Gospel. The inspired Word of God plainly defines “the gospel” for us in 1st Corinthians 15:1-6, “Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve: After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep.” In his sermon, Dr. Smith never even mentions Jesus' death, burial and resurrection. I am so sick and tired of these incompetent pastors who leave off the Gospel, embellishing it with a bunch of garbage not found in the Holy Bible. The false prophets in Matthew 7:21-23 gave their heart to Jesus, devoutly following and serving Christ, calling Him: “Lord, Lord,” but Jesus denied knowing them as His redeemed sheep. You may give your heart to Jesus, follow and serve Him, do many wonderful works in Jesus' name, call Him your “Lord,” and yet still die in your sins and go to Hell for eternity to burn in fire (Revelation 14:11). The Devil's greatest weapon is to con people into living the Christian life without ever being born again.
Not one verse in the inspired Holy Bible teaches that the Devil comes to get an unsaved sinner at death. It is God who controls Hell, not Satan. There are no demons torturing sinners in Hell. The Devil does not torture anyone in Hell. Some demons are already imprisoned in a special place in Hell (Greek noun: Tartarus), but they do not hurt lost sinners. God punishes the wicked. Jesus told a true story in Luke 16:19-31 about a rich man and a beggar named Lazarus. Jesus never used proper names when telling a parable. The rich man died in his sleep and woke up in Hell. There were no devils.
You don't have to give up sinning to be saved. Dr. Smith repeats a story told to him by the pastor who allegedly led him to Christ. Smith says in the story that the wealthy man refused to get saved because he was about to partake in a shady deal for $25,000, and he knew that if he got saved he couldn't do the deal. That is false teaching! Dear reader, you can get saved by God's free grace on Sunday, go to the brothel by sundown, divorce your wife on Monday, rob a bank on Tuesday, murder a man on Wednesday and get drunk on Thursday, but you cannot lose your salvation once you've been born again; and forsaking one's sinful ways is NOT required to receive God's free gift of eternal life. Being willing to forsake your sinful ways is absolutely not a part of God's simple plan of salvation. How could it be, since eternal life is being offered by God to all mankind as a free gift, paid for in full by Jesus' precious blood (1st Peter 1:18-19). Salvation is not a reward for the righteous, it is a gift for the guilty.
If this story is true, the dying man was have delusions, because none of it is biblical. Dr. Smith says the man cried out, “Don't let him (the Devil) have me!” Smith says the Devil wrapped chains around his ankles. Smith sounds like that nutcase Bill Wiese and his “21 Minutes In Hell” circus show. What nonsense! As I mentioned, not one verse in the inspired Holy Bible supports this heresy. I cannot find one place in Scripture where Satan came to get someone when they died. We read in 1st Peter 5:8 that Satan roams the earth as a roaring lion to kill, steal and destroy his victims (John 10:10). We read in Isaiah 14:9, “Hell from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee at thy coming: it stirreth up the dead for thee, even all the chief ones of the earth; it hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations.” I did some research concerning this passage. Check out Bible Hub. In our earthly manmade prisons, whenever a new inmate arrives it is the talk of the prisonhouse! I humbly believe the same holds true in Hell. Although there are no parties in Hell, you will burn alive with your wicked unsaved peers if you go there by your own choice. It is clear from the inspired Scripture that eternally condemned sinners in Hell are fully conscious, gnashing their teeth in excruciating regrets (Luke 13:28).
Avoid superstitious preachers! I hate when preachers try to scare people with bizarre stories that are obviously fake. I have heard numerous preachers, including my hero of the faith Pastor Jack Hyles, use the fake story of drillers in Soviet Russia who dropped a microphone down the Kola Superdeep Borehole in the Pechengsky District and allegedly heard victims screaming in Hell. If that were true, why didn't the microphone burn up? There is a fine line between faith and foolishness. Dr. Smith's strange story of a man screaming for the Devil not to take him on his death bed, while having his hair ripped out on the headboard of his bed from struggling against Satan, is simply not biblical. As a born-again believer, and a fundamentalist Baptist preacher, I don't believe in using bizarre stories to scare people to come to Jesus Christ. The biblical truth of an everlasting burning Hell for all Christ-rejecters is horrifying enough!

Pastor J. Harold Smith was a well known Southern Baptist preacher whose ministry spanned over half a century. At best he was sloppy with God's simple plan of salvation, at worst he was a damnable false prophet. For example: In his sermon titled, Simply Salvation, Dr. Smith preaches the Devil's lie of Lordship Salvation...

“You just say: 'Jesus, this preacher says that you'll have mercy upon me tonight. Have mercy on me Lord. Forgive me of my sins. I'll trust you. I'll open the door of my heart that's been closed to you for all these years. And right now, I'll open the door. I'll let Jesus Christ come in, and the best I know how I'll live for you the rest of my life.'” —Evangelist J. Harold Smith (1910-2001), 'Simply Salvation' (hear MP3 excerpt)

Tragically, this is the kind of theological dung that is being preached in 99% of churches today! Sadly, Dr. Smith never even mentions the Gospel. Warning Will Robinson!!! Danger! Danger! There's nothing in the Bible about doing your best to live for Christ the rest of your earthly life. THAT IS WORKS! Avoid Pastor J. Harold Smith! If a man is wrong on God's simple plan of salvation, you simply cannot trust his theology. It's like buttoning a dress shirt, if you get the first button wrong then all the other buttons will also be wrong.

Dr. Don Boyd (1947-2009) thankfully gets Bible repentance right. Don Boyd was the faithful principal of Hammond Baptist High School for the First Baptist Church of Hammond, Indiana, from 1991 until 2008. I heard him preach at Hyles-Anderson College when I was a student (1985-1993). Don was blind in one eye. He wore a patch to cover his glass eye. There is nothing in the inspired King James Bible about repenting of your sins to get to Heaven. Yet, 99% of churches today (including all the pseudo-Christian cults like Mormon, Jehovah's Witness, Seventh-Day Adventism and Roman Catholic) get repentance WRONG! Those false religions all teach that repentance means to turn away from your sinning to get to Heaven. Whereas the inspired Word of God teaches that repentance is a change of mind from unbelief to faith in Jesus Christ.

We can only judge a man's theology based upon what he actually says, not what he might hopefully believe. As far as I can tell, Dr. Smith is wrong on the Gospel. I've listened to his sermons and he is wrong on how to be saved. You don't have to “give your heart to Jesus” to be saved. No such teaching is found in the inspired Holy Bible. It is so important that we do not stray away from the simplicity that is in Christ, which is the Gospel of free grace (Romans 1:16). The Gospel is threefold:

Jesus DIED on a cross for our sins.
Jesus was BURIED.
Jesus physically RESURRECTED from the dead three days later.

So, what's this garbage talk from Harold Smith about “I'll let Jesus Christ come in and the best I know how I'll live for you the rest of my life” nonsense? I triple-dog dare you to show me that heresy in the inspired Scripture!!! I humbly think Pastor Harry Ironside (1876-1951) said it very well...

“The Gospel is not a call to repentance, or to amendment of our ways, to make restitution for past sins, or to promise to do better in the future. These things are proper in their place, but they do not constitute the Gospel; for the Gospel is not good advice to be obeyed, it is good news to be believed. Do not make the mistake then of thinking that the Gospel is a call to duty or a call to reformation, a call to better your condition, to behave yourself in a more perfect way than you have been doing in the past …Nor is the Gospel a demand that you give up the world, that you give up your sins, that you break off bad habits, and try to cultivate good ones. You may do all these things, and yet never believe the Gospel and consequently never be saved at all.”

SOURCE: Pastor Harry A. Ironside, from the tract: 'What Is The Gospel?'

Dear reader, we need a revival in our Bible colleges, missions and churches of presenting the Gospel as clear, unadulterated and simple as possible. I love what Pastor Ralph Yankee Arnold said...

“There is power in this Gospel message. Most people just don't know how to present it... The clarity of the Gospel is what makes it easy for them to believe.”—Pastor Yankee Arnold, “WHY GRACE CAN SAVE THE WORST MAN!”

Amen and amen! Do you know how to present the Gospel clearly and accurately?

Dear friend, preachers everywhere over the past few centuries have been careless in how they handle the inspired Word of Truth. I hear fools like Ray Comfort and John MacArthur (1939-2025) touting the doctrinal soundness of the old-time preachers from the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, but the truth is that in every generation there have been true and false prophets. The so-called “doctrinally sound preachers” that heretics' Ray Comfort and John MacArthur endorse were the damnable false teachers of their generation.

Even in the New Testament the inspired writer of 1st John 2:18 said, “Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.” False prophets have always existed. Please “Search the scripture” as Jesus commanded in John 5:39, so that you won't be woefully deceived and end up in Hell with those lying preachers (Matthew 7:13-15; Luke 13:23-24). Remember, the road to Hell is paved with good intentions (Proverbs 16:25).

RIGHT DOCTRINE MATTERS!

An Ordained Baptist Preacher Who Doesn't Believe Jesus Resurrected From The Dead

2026-02-22T17:24:00.003-06:00

1st Corinthians 15:17, “And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins.”

1st John 2:22-23, “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.”

Dear reader, do you know that there are actually preachers who don't believe Jesus raised up from the dead? I'm talking about ordained Baptist ministers! What a tragedy!

Clearly they have never been born again. I will tell you at the end of this article about whom I am speaking, and you will likely be surprised who it is when I name him. This fella was and still is one of the most famous preachers in history. Yet, he didn't believe the inspired Holy Bible. ...

Matthew 28:7, “And go quickly, and tell his disciples that he is risen from the dead; and, behold, he goeth before you into Galilee; there shall ye see him: lo, I have told you.”

Mark 16:6, “And he saith unto them, Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him.”

Luke 24:1, “Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the sepulchre, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them. And they found the stone rolled away from the sepulchre. And they entered in, and found not the body of the Lord Jesus. And it came to pass, as they were much perplexed thereabout, behold, two men stood by them in shining garments: And as they were afraid, and bowed down their faces to the earth, they said unto them, Why seek ye the living among the dead? He is not here, but is risen: remember how he spake unto you when he was yet in Galilee, Saying, The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again.”

What a fool! Jesus calls him a fool in Luke 24:25-26, “Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken: Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?” Only a fool denies the Gospel.

I'm talking about a Baptist minister who had tens of thousands of loyal followers, who all became his victims. This ordained Baptist minister spent his life preaching a social gospel of equality and justice, but not the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ. Clearly, he used his position as an ordained Baptist preacher as a deceptive front to deceive his victims. He was a clever charlatan. Since he masqueraded as a minister of righteousness, it gave credence to his communist social message of hobnobbing with homosexual associates and other wicked groups in society, turning the opinion of the masses toward ungodliness instead of righteousness, a modern-day Baalam.

It shouldn't come as too big a surprise that Satan would have ordained Baptist preachers working for him in lieu of 2nd Corinthians 11:13-15, “For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.” Truly, truth is stranger than fiction!

Do you know who this ungodly man was? It was Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968). Yes, Martin Luther King Jr. was an ordained Baptist preacher, and a child of the Devil until his untimely death, assassinated in 1968 by a gunman. This just proves that we live in a world of heathen liars, con artists and deceivers who are inspired by Satan.

Right doctrine matters!

Damnable False Prophet, Pastor A.W. Tozer

2026-02-18T12:12:00.041-06:00

Galatians 1:6-9, “I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.”

Aiden Wilson Tozer (1897–1963) was a long-time pastor on Chicago's southside at the Southside Alliance Church from 1928 to 1959. Tragically, Pastor Tozer was a damnable FALSE PROPHET who emphasized that spiritual regeneration requires moral reformation, meaning that true change in one's life and intentions must occur before one can experience the new birth. Tozer foolishly argued against the inspired Scripture that the idea of being pardoned without a commitment to change contradicts biblical teachings. In reality, it was Aiden Tozer who contradicted the Word of God. Right doctrine matters!!!

Here are the accursed words of a darn fool, an unlearned man who interpreted the Holy Scriptures from his own flawed human reasoning, mixing works with grace...

No Regeneration Without Reformation
In the Bible the offer of pardon on the part of God is conditioned upon intention to reform on the part of man. There can be no spiritual regeneration till there has been a moral Reformation. That this statement requires defense only proves how far from the truth we have strayed.

In our current popular theology pardon depends upon faith alone. The very word reform has been banished from among the sons of the Reformation! We often hear the declaration, ” I do not preach Reformation; I preach regeneration.” Now we recognize this as being the expression of a commendable revolt against the insipid and unscriptural doctrine of salvation by human effort. But the declaration as it stands contains real error, for it opposes Reformation to regeneration.

Actually the two are never opposed to each other in sound Bible theology. The not – Reformation – but – regeneration doctrine incorrectly presents us with an either – or; either you take Reformation or you take regeneration. This is inaccurate. The fact is that on this subject we are presented not with an either - or, but with a both - and. The converted man is both reformed and regenerated. And unless the sinner is willing to reform his way of living he will never know the inward experience of regeneration. This is the vital truth which has gotten lost under the leaves in popular evangelical theology.

The idea that God will pardon a rebel who has not given up his rebellion is contrary to the Scriptures and to common sense. How horrible to contemplate a church full of persons who have been pardoned but who still love sin and hate the ways of righteousness. And how much more horrible to think of heaven as filled with sinners who had not repented nor changed their way of living. [emphasis added] —Pastor Aiden Tozer, “The Root Of The Righteous” (1955)

BLASPHEMY! The old adage is very true: To the man with a hammer in his hand, everything starts looking like a nail sticking up. And to Pastor Aiden Tozer who hated sin so much that it corrupted his theology, somewhere along the way he lost his way concerning the Gospel of free grace, which is without works. Galatians 2:21, “I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.” By wickedly requiring reformation (behavior modification) as a prerequisite for regeneration (being born again), Aiden Tozer frustrates the grace of God.

The Greek word for “frustrate” in Galatians 2:21 is atheteo, which means: “to set aside, that is, (by implication) to disesteem, neutralize or violate.” When any corrupt preacher confuses service with salvation, he neutralizes the Gospel. He has unintentionally set aside the truth of the Gospel, so that lost sinners cannot be saved. The Devil is not fighting religion. He is too smart for that. Satan has produced a counterfeit Christianity today, so much like the real one, that true Christians are either too inept or too afraid to speak out against it.

Satan's greatest weapon is to con people into living the Christian life without ever being born again, a term that is rarely heard from church pulpits anymore. The last thing in the world that the Devil wants is for anyone to be born again. He wants you to spend eternity with him burning in the Lake of Fire forever, which is where all Christ-rejecters will spend eternity. No one ever went to Hell except those who chose to go there by rejecting God's free offer of salvation through faith alone in His only begotten Son, apart from all human effort.

John 3:20, 21 And Repentance

The dear LORD Himself said in John 3:20-21, “For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.” Lost people who love sinning won't come to the Savior, lest their sin be reproved (spoken evil against). This is why Jesus said in John 5:40, “And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life.” Jesus did not say “ye cannot come,” He said “ye will not come.”

So, regarding people who intend to continue sinning getting saved, the problem takes care of itself. Jesus said those who love their sins won't get saved. But perverting the Gospel by tampering with it, adding an unbiblical requirement to turn from your sinning is wrong and evil. Being willing to turn from your sins is not a part of God's simple plan of salvation, and you cannot disprove me with the inspired King James Bible.

Anyone who comes to God by faith as an admitted guilty sinner (Romans 3:19-20), believing that Christ died for their sins on Calvary's cross 2,000 years ago, and was buried, and then resurrected three days later, is saved. This is THE GOSPEL which has the power to save those who believe it (1st Corinthians 15:1-6; Romans 1:16). You do not have to be willing to give up your sinning to be saved, you simply need to come to Christ as a needy sinner. It is not my job nor yours to judge sinners, to interrogate them to see if they are willing to stop sinning. To do so is a perversion of God's grace. If someone wants to be saved, that is good enough.

I have never met anybody who rejoiced that they could continue sinning and still go to Heaven. The whole terrible idea of telling someone that God won't save them unless they are willing to “repent of their sins” is very unscriptural. If someone desires to be saved, regardless of what you may foolishly think or perceive, they CAN be saved just as they are.

Just as I am, without one plea,
But that Thy blood was shed for me,
And that Thou bidst me come to Thee,
O Lamb of God, I come, I come. SOURCE

Furthermore, John 3:21 doesn't say “he that turns from his sins” cometh to the light; but rather, it says “he that doeth truth” cometh to the light, to be saved. Jesus said that! 2nd Timothy 2:25, “In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth.” Bible repentance regarding salvation is a matter of changing your mind to acknowledge THE TRUTH that you are a guilty SINNER, and Jesus is the only SAVIOR. In the simplest essence this is what the Holy Bible is—Old and New Testaments; or, respectively, Law and Christ. The Old Testament shows humanity our sinnership (Romans 3:19-20); and then brings us to Christ in the New Testament to be saved by grace through faith in Jesus (Galatians 3:24-26).

Pastor Aiden Tozer's Damnable Counterfeit Gospel

Tragically, Pastor Aiden Tozer undoubtedly is in Hell this moment, regretting his misunderstanding of the Scripture. I do not see how anyone could go to Heaven who is so wrong on God's simple plan of salvation, that they think your must first be willing to forsake a lifestyle of sinning and reform your behavior to please a holy God.

Folks, that is pure works, not grace! Jesus died for your sins on Calvary's cross 2,000 years ago, paying a debt so massive that neither you nor I could pay for it. If God were to require us to pay for our own sins, we'd have to burn in hell forever and ever and ever without hope, without rest day or night, suffering in misery and pain and loneliness, gnashing our teeth with regrets in knowing that FOR FREE we could have enjoyed the blessings and splendor of Heaven for all eternity with joy. The choice is yours alone to make.

I was thinking recently about the sad final fate of AC/DC's original band members, all of whom have rejected Jesus as the Christ. Some fans literally consider AC/DC their religion. The band openly mocks the reality of Hell with such wicked songs as, “Highway To Hell,” spitting in God's face. Woe unto Angus Young, Phil Rudd, Cliff Williams and Brian Johnson when they join Bon Scott and Malcolm Young in the everlasting fires of Hell, the horrifying place that they've made billions of dollars mocking for filthy lucre and entertainment. Woe unto the wicked! Their time is running out quickly on earth (Hebrews 4:13, 9:27; Ecclesiastes 12:13-14).

Pastor Aiden Tozer was sincere, no doubt (Proverbs 16:25); but so was Judas Iscariot who reformed his life after throwing Jesus under the bus. Judas repented of his sins (Matthew 27:3). Judas was truly sorry for betraying an innocent man to death, Jesus. Judas frantically returned the 30 pieces of silver, but the wicked Pharisees rejected the money (Matthew 27:3-5). It was highly hypocritical of the same ungodly Pharisees who wickedly paid Judas the 30 pieces of silver in the first place to betray Jesus, to now after the fact (in their self righteousness) refuse to take back their own money, hypocritically calling it “blood money.” It sure was blood money, and the Pharisee's hands were covered with it!

Please dear reader, “search the Scriptures” as Jesus commanded in John 5:29, and please do not listen to some idiot unlearned preacher who has no idea what he is talking about. Aiden Tozer has it all backwards. He says there can be no regeneration without reformation, but the exact opposite is biblical and true. There can be no reformation (a change of behavior) without regeneration (the new birth). What Pastor Tozer and so many neo-evangelical fools like him fail to understand is that it is God's Holy Spirit who changes a man, that is, the “fruit” of the indwelling Holy Spirit; and not we ourselves (Galatians 5:22-25).

Mr. Tozer errantly requires that a lost sinner reform them self of sinful behavior first (in their own weak human strength), before God will be willing to pardon their iniquities to save them. Tozer has it all backwards. God saves a man, and then the Holy Spirit begins to change him. That being said, the world is full of carnal Christians who live open lives of sin and debauchery. The Gospel of free grace (aka, “easy believism”) is not the problem. The problem is today's lazy, ungodly and incompetent pastors who refuse to preach the truth, refuse to contend for the faith, refuse to cry aloud against sin, refuse to unconditionally love people, and refuse to obey God in other matters as well. Today's churches and Bible colleges are pathetic!

Matthew 7:15, “Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.”

If Christians Will Judge Angels In The Future, Why Do Roman Catholics Pray To Them?

2026-02-12T07:50:00.131-06:00

1st Corinthians 6:1-3, “Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints? Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?”

In my humble opinion, humans are not worth more than the angels. I believe God loves the angels too, but you are correct that only sinful humans have been redeemed by Christ's sacrifice on Calvary's cross. Mankind is the object of God's great love. I do not claim to understand it all, and I humbly don't think any human being can claim to have it all figured out either.

Nowhere does the inspired Holy Bible teaches that men should worship angels. In fact, we read in Colossians 2:18, “Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind...” This Scripture passage clearly indicts the wicked religion of Roman Catholicism, the Whore of Rome. Catholics are so arrogant and wilfully blind that they have even removed the 2nd Commandment not to bow to to graven images and idols. ...

Catholics have changed God's Word into a lie (Romans 1:25), but they still haven't changed THE TRUTH. The Bible says in Psalms 8:5b that God created man “a little lower than the angels,” so at present the angels outrank us. I cannot even grasp the idea that we woefully sinful humans will judge angels. It could be that we will only judge the fallen angels, demons. This raises a good question. Do the good angels sin? If they don't, why would humans judge them? We know that the fallen angels sin, and we will judge them. It makes no sense to us

According to BibleHub.com...

“Believers will judge angels as part of their future role in God's kingdom, reflecting their authority and identity in Christ. This judgment primarily pertains to fallen angels, emphasizing the believers' union with Christ and their participation in His ultimate justice.”

I tend to agree with that exegesis. I see no reason why Christians would judge the faithful angels who haven't sinned. I think we would be wise not to be dogmatic in these unlearned matters in which we can only speculate at best. We know that it is sinful to worship anything or anyone other than God (which includes Jesus, our Creator and Savior, who is also almighty God; and the indwelling Holy Spirit, who is God with us). Someone has said that we pray to the Father in the name of the Son by the power of the Holy Spirit. That being said, we can indeed pray to Jesus and the Holy Spirit too, knowing that we are praying to the ONE true and living God (Deuteronomy 6:4).

I just think it's important that we understand that without Jesus, we have no access to the Father. 1st Timothy 2:5-6, “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.” As a side note, please notice that Jesus gave Himself a ransom for "ALL," not just for "some" as ungodly Calvinists errantly teach. Jesus Christ is the ONLY mediator between God and man. This is why praying to Mary, angels or other saints is futile, because they have no power to help us, nor to relate messages to God. Catholics foolishly teach that since Mary is Jesus' mother, she has a special power to manipulate her Son. But this teaching blatantly contradicts 1st Timothy 2:5, which says that Jesus is the ONLY mediator.

I wish far more Bible preachers would expose the Whore of Rome! It's a rare thing nowadays to hear a preacher exposing the evils of Roman Catholicism, Catholics are everywhere in American society. Our own U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance is a devout hellbound Catholic, as is Governor Ron Desantis in Florida. He's a great governor, but is sadly still in his sins without Christ. NO ONE is saved who trusts in Sacramental Salvation, which fools include heretics like Martin Luther (1483-1546).

In his Large and Small Catechisms written in 1529 (12 years after his alleged conversion to Christianity in 1517), Martin Luther requires “Holy Baptism” and “Holy Communion” (neither of which are biblical terms) to get to Heaven. Sacraments are 100% foreign to the inspired Word of God. Sadly, other than myself and Pastor Max D. Younce (1935-2023), I am not aware of any preachers who expose Martin Luther as a wolf in sheep's clothing, a hellbound reprobate.

Dear reader, you should NEVER bow down nor pray to Catholic statues, nor pray to Mother Mary, nor worship The Image of Divine Mercy. For to do so is the woeful sin of IDOLATRY! Just because the hellbound wicked Vatican has removed the Second Commandment from the Ten Commandments, doesn't mean that it's not still there in the true inspired Holy Bible. Psalms 119:89, “For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven.”

RUN from bastardized Roman and Orthodox (Russian) Catholic churches, and Lutheran churches too! These are deadly manmade false religions who trust in sacraments, and not in biblical salvation by grace alone through faith alone in Jesus Christ alone. Jesus said in no uncertain terms in John 3:3b that if you want to enter into the Kingdom of God, “Ye must be born again.” Have you been born again yet? If not, now is the time to get saved.

You get saved dear reader by coming to God as a guilty sinner (Romans 3:19-20), and by faith (taking God at His written Word) accepting Christ's sacrifice on Calvary's cross 2,000 years ago as full payment for your sins, believing that Jesus was buried, but then bodily resurrected three days later. This is the 'GOOD NEWS' (Gospel) taught in 1st Corinthians 15:1-6. There is no other way of salvation for humanity, than through faith in the precious name of Jesus (Acts 4:10-12; John 14:6; Galatians 3:26).

God's redeemed children (saints) will someday judge the world and the angels. Do not then make the grave error of elevating them, which is the sin of idolatry. Revelation 22:8-9, “And I John saw these things, and heard them. And when I had heard and seen, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel which shewed me these things. Then saith he unto me, See thou do it not: for I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren the prophets, and of them which keep the sayings of this book: worship God.”

PANTS ON FEMALES – Is there more to the issue?

2026-02-07T04:37:00.025-06:00

Deuteronomy 22:5, “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.”

Dear reader, if you honestly think that our text passage of inspired Scripture is mere expired Old Testament Jewish ceremonial law, you are a fool indeed. Deuteronomy 22:5 is moral law applicable to all people for all generations! God mandates that a clear distinction between the two genders of male and female be maintained at all times. Anything else is a sin!

PANTS ON FEMALES – Is there more to the issue?

THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM NO ONE WANTS TO TALK ABOUT

Pants On Women – Is That All There Is To It?

Same-sex marriage, mothers no longer working in the home, families going their separate ways with no time together, the feminization of men, the masculinization of women. These are the things I see as I look out over the landscape of our country. I find myself asking, “Where has manhood gone?” and “Where has femininity gone?”

As I read the messages preached and the books written by my mentor, Dr. Jack Hyles, I sense in him a concern for the direction in which our country was moving with regards to manhood and womanhood. He even preached a sermon, which later was published in booklet form, on the subject of the unisex movement.

Today we seldom even think about it yet so many of the things about which he warned us have now come true and for the most part we have accepted them. We have lost the distinction between the sexes. We’ve lost the pride of masculinity and femininity. In fact, society derides both.

Perhaps nothing has brought more criticism to Dr. Hyles than did his strict position on women wearing pants for those in church leadership. He never wavered on that position, however he never treated women who wore pants with disrespect or unkindness. He NEVER made the issue of a woman wearing pants as proof of whether or not she was a Christian, or whether or not she loved the Lord. The issue really was not as much about the individual as it was with the whole.

He saw us moving away from the distinctiveness of the sexes towards a homogenous sameness that he felt was wrong. He saw the issue in ways that others did not. It was more of a philosophy that he preached. Deuteronomy 22:5 meant more to him than just a matter of women wearing pants. It stood for something much bigger. It stood for the fact that men should dress like men and women like women. Even in Bible days the distinctions were very clear and he wanted for them to remain clear in our day.

Did we somehow become lost and confused as to what the issue was really about? Does it really not matter if men dress differently than women and women than men? Is it really important that there be a distinctiveness between masculinity and femininity? The issue wasn’t as much about pants as it was principle. He was looking at a much bigger picture than most. Perhaps we saw the issue to vaguely. Perhaps we missed the point entirely.

Many men who once agreed on the issue of pants have now changed their position. Perhaps the position was too small or too narrow in the first place. Perhaps pants in and of themselves was not the issue. Perhaps the real issue was the matter of the distinctiveness between the attire of men and women. Pants gave us a focal point for the real issue, which was that men ought to dress like men and women like women.

Has that changed? Does it matter? Should we care if boys dress like girls? Should it matter to us if girls dress like boys? Is it really relevant? There has always been a focal issue that rallied us behind a principle. Long hair on men rallied us against rebellion, which was the bigger issue. Pants was the focal point for the principle of women not dressing like men. Yet when it comes to the issue of women wearing pants we seem to have missed the point. What is the point? The point is the Bible principle.

What is the Bible principle? The principle is that men should dress like men and women should dress like women. Has that changed or is the Bible still true? Should men wear clothing that pertains to a woman? Should women wear clothing that pertains to a man?

If you are an honest person you will have to admit that females in public have taken the half off sale seriously. Hip hugging skinny jeans revealing mid riffs. I travel every week of the world around this great nation of ours. It is embarrassing for a man who is doing the best he can to keep his heart right with all of the female flesh on display.

Then I go into some of our churches and find myself wondering who is standing for the Bible principle of distinction in God’s house. The decline of American morality is reflected in our distinction. The decline of our churches is also reflected in our dress distinction. 50 years ago it was not so in public and for sure it was not so in our churches.

The Mrs. Cleaver look was in almost every home in 1950’s. Not so in either the home or the house of God, in a lot of cases, in this new Millennium. If God wanted a distinction in the Old Testament how much more does He desire it in the New Testament.

Murder was brought to a higher level and was identified in the word “hate.” (Matthew 5:21-22) Adultery was brought to a higher level by Jesus Himself in the New Testament to the word “lust.” (Matthew 5:28) This “second mile” level we find in the New Testament I am afraid is certainly not prevalent in this new Millennium.

Distinction was brought to a higher level in the New Testament. (I Timothy 2:9) Deuteronomy 22:5 has been elevated to “modest” clothing. No skinny jeans here! The Bible principle is for today.

So, if the principle is still true why are we criticizing those who took a stand regarding women wearing pants? I for one must allow others to disagree on the issue, but I’m concerned when they ignore the importance of the Bible principle upon which we built that position. If we lose the principle then we lose the purity of the Scripture.

If we begin to criticize those who took a stand then we should be explaining how we then are carrying out that principle. What should women wear that which a man shouldn’t? What should men wear that women shouldn’t? Does it matter? It has to because it is covered in his word.

Should we fight over the issue of pants? No, however many of the ones who are fighting the most are the ones who are fighting against those who took or still take that stand. I do not fight the women who wear pants or the preachers who allow it nearly as much as they fight me.

They don’t know my heart because they haven’t taken the time to understand why I take my position. My position on this issue is based on principle not preference. I am tolerant of those who disagree with my application but should we be tolerant to those who ignore the principle entirely?

The principle is not up for debate, so why would you criticize my commitment to a principle even though you may not like my application of that principle? The principle is that men are to dress like men and women like women and there must be some distinction.

What is the distinction? If you tell me my position is wrong then simply explain to me what the distinction is that you are making between the attire of men and the attire of women. I’ll be satisfied with that.

If you’re going to criticize me because I have put some kind of distinction into the principle then tell me what your distinction is based upon that same principle. Whether Deuteronomy 22:5 means pants on women or not it must mean something? What does it mean? Explain it.

Don’t tell me that men wore robes in the Bible as your excuse? Trust me, the attire of men and the attire of women in those days was very distinctive. There was no question as to what was a man’s clothing and what was a woman’s clothing. My challenge to you is not proof of whether pants on women is right or wrong but whether or not you know what it means to you.

Let’s face it the breaking down between the sexes has taken place. We no longer have the distinctions we once had between men and women including the way they dress. Dr. Hyles and others warned us of this danger more than they warned us of women wearing pants. He warned us of the danger of losing the distinction between the sexes. Pants was a symptom of the issue, but many have turned this against those who warned of the true danger.

We’ve been called legalists because of a standard based upon a Scriptural principle found in Deuteronomy 22:5. We were not trying to set the standard for everyone. There was a time when public schools made the same distinction and female students were prohibited from wearing pants. There was a time when only women that society considered loose wore pants.

I’m not suggesting that’s true today, but what I am suggesting there is a Bible principle that we are not discussing honestly. Those who take a position are being ridiculed by those who have no position on a very clear principle.

I remember in 1959 when the PTA of our public school held a meeting discussing whether or not they should promote a “Slack Friday” for the girl students. I have often wondered why they did not allow “Skirt Friday” for the boy students? Now in the public work places it is “Slack Week.”

Tell me pastor what should women wear, or does it matter? What should men wear? Does it matter? This is not legalism. This is applying principles to our lives. There’s a legitimate reason that we took the positions we took. I’m saddened by the condition of our country, but I am not surprised. Same sex marriage is a result of the casual way we have dealt with issues in our country and even in many churches.

This smacks of a “oneness” move in fundamentalism that wants to absorb all issues into a “distinctness lessoning” position. I read the BLOGS and it worries me that if you take a contrary stand or an aggressive stand on issues you are causing the cause to not dwell in unity. We are not Catholics! We are not a part of a “universal body.” When the cause becomes greater than the truth we are on a downward spiral spiritually.

We are a nation that has completely lost its mind and its morality. Yet we are criticizing men who say women shouldn’t wear pants, because women are commanded to dress differently than men? How dare you be so concerned about a man who preaches against women wearing pants that you neglect to acknowledge that the distinction between the sexes has been broken. Yet, it is a distinction God gave us.

So, now I put the responsibility back on your shoulders. Tell us what to do? If there’s no problem then there’s nothing to worry about, but I think we all know there is a problem. Dr. Hyles was right. The unisex movement is a satanic pursuit to blur the lines between the roles and identity of men and women. How do we fix it? What’s the standard going to be? Is there going to be no standard? I think it’s time to give it a second thought.

If the pastor’s wife has no distinction in her dress, then no wonder the pastor has lock-jaw and is like the Antartica and frozen at the mouth. This makes it difficult to lead a local church let alone a movement.

Christians who believe in traditional marriage were shocked at the in your face sodomy display at the NFL draft. The truth is they may have to look in the mirror and figure out what happened to the distinction of the sexes as having laid the foundation for this and other woes. This is NOT hate speech, this is Scriptural speech. We are losing ground because we have lost the distinctiveness God gave us! —Pastor Bob Gray Sr., 'PANTS ON FEMALES – Is there more to the issue?'

Pastor David Hoffman Is Wrong To Promote A Flat Earth And Geocentricity

2026-02-03T17:00:00.051-06:00

Genesis 7:10, “And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth.”
“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.” —George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950)”
Kindly said, respectfully, Pastor David Hoffman discredits himself as a trustworthy preacher by ridiculously teaching that the earth is flat. It is not good. Science easily proves in numerous ways that the earth is a sphere, not flat. The International Space Station circles the earth 16 times each day in orbit. I just bought a Common Man's Reference Bible for $155. I wanted to learn what I could from Pastor Hoffman as a fellow King James Bible preacher, and refute his shameful teaching that we live on a flat earth that doesn't move through space (aka, the heresy of Geocentricity). I bought Pastor Hoffman's soft cover lambskin 6th edition (2021) of 'The Common Man's Reference Bible.'

On page 13 in his commentary for Genesis 7:10, Pastor Hoffman writes (this is the full quote):

“Religious evolutionists believe the earth is rotating over 1,000 miles an hour at the equator while the earth travels around the sun over 66,600 miles per hour. When the windows of the firmament were opened, a deluge of water settled to its own level and covered the earth. The waters are naturally contained within a massive wall of ice commonly called Antarctica or the ends of the earth (Job 26:10; 37:10; Ps. 135:7; Prov. 8:29; Jer. 51:15-16; Amos 5:8). The natural physics of the upper surface of water at rest is a horizontal plane or sea level.”

Religious evolutionists? No, Pastor Hoffman, legitimate scientists! Legitimate science is correct that the earth spins on its axis 1,040 miles per hour at the equator, and indeed the earth does in fact orbit the sun at 67,000 miles an hour. Pastor Hoffman is blatantly WRONG!

Here are the above cited passages by David Hoffman, so you can examine them for yourself...

Job 26:10, "He hath compassed the waters with bounds, until the day and night come to an end."

Job 37:10, "By the breath of God frost is given: and the breadth of the waters is straitened."

Psalms 135:7, "He causeth the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth; he maketh lightnings for the rain; he bringeth the wind out of his treasuries."

Proverbs 8:29, "When he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of the earth."

Jeremiah 51:15-16, "He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his wisdom, and hath stretched out the heaven by his understanding. When he uttereth his voice, there is a multitude of waters in the heavens; and he causeth the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth: he maketh lightnings with rain, and bringeth forth the wind out of his treasures."

Amos 5:8, "Seek him that maketh the seven stars and Orion, and turneth the shadow of death into the morning, and maketh the day dark with night: that calleth for the waters of the sea, and poureth them out upon the face of the earth: The LORD is his name."

Nothing in these inspired Scripture passages support Pastor Hoffman's heresy that the earth is flat. The old adage is true: "To the man with a hammer in his hand, everything looks like a nail sticking up." By teaching that the earth is flat, Pastor Hoffman alienates learned sinners who because of his stark ignorance of scientific FACTS will disregard anything else he has to say. So it is a big deal, a problem.

In my 6th edition of The Common Man's Reference Bible, Pastor Hoffman's commentary for Genesis 1:7 is exactly the same as Rick Jacoby describes in this video. You can plainly hear Pastor Hoffman teach a flat earth heresy by searching YouTube for his video title: "The Bible Overcomes Preconceived Ideas - Part 4 - Geocentric with a Stationary and Circular Earth."

Science proves that the earth is NOT flat. The Sun and planets revolve around a common center of mass known as the barycenter, which is influenced by their respective gravitational pulls. While the Sun is the dominant mass in the solar system, the gravitational effects of the planets, especially the larger ones like Jupiter, can shift this barycenter slightly outside the Sun. Geocentricity is FALSE!

RIGHT DOCTRINE MATTERS!

Pastor's Wife Gets Caught With Her Pants On

2026-01-30T11:17:00.023-06:00

Deuteronomy 22:5, “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.”

Kindly said, if you ignorantly think that our text passage of Scripture from Deuteronomy 22:5 should be dismissed as mere Jewish ceremonial law, then you are a darn fool. Our holy God desires and commands holiness from His saints, not that Christian females adorn themselves in the ungodly world's attire of pants, shorts and miniskirts. Save that attire for the bedroom on your marriage night where it belongs! I speak THE TRUTH! 1st Peter 1:15-16, “But as he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation; Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy.” We will all lower our heads in shame on Judgment Day!

I and Alice actually heard Pastor Brad Moffett's backslidden wife shamefully compliment a young teen girl on her “nice shorts” at the church's annual picnic at the Lillian Recreational Park in Alabama in May of 2025. It was the church's annual Memorial Day picnic. The pastor's wicked wife made sure to say it right in front of our faces, clearly to taunt me as a fundamentalist Bible preacher.

It was quite obvious what compelled the pastor's wife to do what she did, because Alice came to the picnic in a feminine modest full-length dress, which without saying a single word made the wicked pastor's wife feel like an immoral woman because she was wearing her worldly snug pants. We did not take her SHAME upon us! We left the picnic. It couldn't have been more obvious that we were not welcomed, all because we are separated fundamentalist believers and they are neo-evangelical unseparated hypocrites. From day one in 2021 they held a sinful grudge against me because of my fundamentalist ministry.

And I'll say it again, lest anyone falsely accuse me of wrongly judging others, it was THE PASTOR AND HIS WIFE WHO MADE AN ISSUE of my Bible preaching, not me. I am simply taking a biblical stand to finish what THEY STARTED. Psalms 94:16, “Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? or who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity?” I couldn't care less if the pastor's wife and mother wear pants, which is why in the 45 months that I attended the Family Baptist Church I never once spoke a single word against them.

You see dear reader, that is the power of THE TRUTH. If you are a godly Christian lady and you wear a long dress everywhere you go, worldly hussies who wear their shameful pants WILL persecute, mock and be mean to you. So says the inspired Holy Scripture in 2nd Timothy 3:12, “Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.” That is why they ruthlessly kicked me and Alice of of their religious social club, because they know WE ARE RIGHT! That is why neither of the pastor' wives ever welcomed my wife into the church. They horribly avoided her. If you simply carry a Holy Bible and live godly in Christ Jesus, the world will give you up! And sadly, so also will today's army of ungodly neo-evangelical Laodicean churches give you up. I speak this to their utter shame!

The pastor's wife's pride overwhelmed her at the church picnic. She literally got caught with HER PANTS ON! She didn't think that we'd actually show up at their picnic in another state, but we did. SHAME on Brad Moffett and his immodest wife. SHAME on his potty-mouthed ingrate for a father Bobby Moffett and his immodest wife. They are the world's missionaries to the church! No wonder people don't want to attend churches anymore, they all suck! They kicked us out of their church because it is not the LORD's church. That is clear.

And you listen to me, SHAME ON YOU too dear reader if you defend women wearing pants, when our U.S. prisons are FULL of men who have lost the lustful war against their soul. All because of some two-bit IMMODEST female who caused them to give into temptation to lust (Matthew 5:28). Since lust is a sin, women wearing pants is a sin!!! You are a darn fool if you disagree. No, Pastor Brad, it is not okay for your wife to wear sexy pants just because men shouldn't lust. What a failure as a pastor! I write with a sad heart. What saith the Scripture? ...
1st Peter 2:11-12, “Dearly beloved, I beseech you as strangers and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts, which war against the soul; Having your conversation honest among the Gentiles: that, whereas they speak against you as evildoers, they may by your good works, which they shall behold, glorify God in the day of visitation.”

For a shameful pastor to say what Brad Moffett said to I and Alice (that his wife can wear pants because men shouldn't lust upon her) is to side with the enemy of the flesh. It is no different than when Hollywood actor Jane Fonda (aka, “Hanoi Jane”) shamefully went to North Vietnam in 1972 to protest with the communists against our U.S. troops who were being killed in the war. The U.S. Department of Justice should have revoked her U.S. citizenship immediately and let her live in North Korea. Shame on Jane Fonda and Brad Moffett for siding with the enemy! Of the Christian's three enemies: Satan, the world and the flesh, the flesh is the most deadly because it is with us continually.

As of 2021, there were approximately 127,282 men incarcerated in U.S. state prisons for sex offenses involving children. This number reflects only those convicted of sex crimes against minors and does not include all sex crime offenders. That's just underaged sex convictions! There are MILLIONS of American men arrested each year because of some whorish woman who provoked them with immodest clothing, “the attire of an harlot” (Proverbs 7:10b). If you laugh, mock, joke and make light of this importance matter of MODESTY, then woe be unto you in eternity when you answer to a holy God who sacrificed His only begotten Son to pay for OUR SINS (Romans 14:10-12). PAYDAY SOMEDAY!!!

If you think I'm being ridiculous or have gone off the reservation, please look at what singer Taylor Swift is pushing on young teenagers. Why won't the ungodly mainstream media persecute Taylor Swift for her raunchy videos and attempt to sexualize our children? Jesus gave us the answer in John 15:19, “If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.” Tragically, this also means that worldly churches will hate a separated fundamentalist Bible-believing, Christ-honoring, obedient Christian.

Religious women who wears pants are not glorifying God, they are blaspheming the inspired Word of God and glorifying the flesh. From the Lighthouse Baptist Church on Guam, I saw Pastor Sean Quinlan's admirable wife walking through the Micronesia Mall one day several years ago. She was wearing a beautiful full-length maroon dress and gave me a very feminine curtsy, which made a big impression upon me, that she is a godly woman. I saw multiple men, neighbours, greet her with admiration and respect. If that had been Brad Moffett's wife in pants, NOT ONE MAN would have acknowledged her as a lady. You know dear reader that I am telling THE TRUTH. Proverbs 12:17, “He that speaketh truth sheweth forth righteousness: but a false witness deceit.”

When wicked neo-evangelical pastors kick out of their church a fundamentalist Bible-believing Christian couple for doing what is right, you had better believe that I am going to make a fuss. I'll never shut up! You might as well talk to your dog if you think I'm going to let this go.

I humbly don't claim to be a good Christian, but you won't find a more sincere preacher who works night and day to reach lost people for Christ, and to feed the dear Savior's sheep. I love everybody with God's unconditional love and I do not hate the people at Family Baptist Church, God knows my heart. Somebody needs to take a stand for truth and righteousness.

Thank you dear friend for reading my ministry blog. To God alone be the praise and glory. Jesus is precious!!!

Modern Bible Perversions Say People Worshipped King David

2026-01-28T16:29:00.003-06:00

1st Chronicles 29:20, “And David said to all the congregation, Now bless the LORD your God. And all the congregation blessed the LORD God of their fathers, and bowed down their heads, and worshipped the LORD, and the king.”

The inspired King James Bible teaches in our text passage of Scripture that the Jewish people in Israel worshipped God, and the King also worshipped God. But the modernized corrupt Bible revisions remove the comma, so that now the people are also worshipping the king, David. God does not share His praise and glory with anyone! Isaiah 42:8, “I am the LORD: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images.” There is no way that the Jewish people worshipped king David on par with God.

KING JAMES BIBLE (KJV) - 1st Chronicles 29:20, “And David said to all the congregation, Now bless the LORD your God. And all the congregation blessed the LORD God of their fathers, and bowed down their heads, and worshipped the LORD, and the king.”

The modern Bible versions get it very wrong...

COMMON ENGLISH BIBLE (CEB) - 1st Chronicles 29:20, “Then David said to the whole assembly, “Bless the Lord your God,” and the whole assembly blessed the Lord, the God of their ancestors, bowed down, and worshipped before the Lord and the king.”

ENGLISH STANDARD VERSION (ESV) - 1st Chronicles 29:20, “Then David said to all the assembly, “Bless the Lord your God.” And all the assembly blessed the Lord, the God of their fathers, and bowed their heads and paid homage to the Lord and to the king.”

EASY-TO-READ-VERSION (ERV) - 1st Chronicles 29:20, “Then David said to all the group of people gathered together, “Now give praise to the Lord your God.” So all the people gave praise to the Lord God, the God their ancestors worshiped. They bowed to the ground to give honor to the Lord and to the king.”

NEW KING JAMES VERSION (NKJV) - 1st Chronicles 29:20, “Then David said to all the assembly, “Now bless the Lord your God.” So all the assembly blessed the Lord God of their fathers, and bowed their heads and prostrated themselves before the Lord and the king.”

NEW LIVING TRANSLATION (NLT) - 1st Chronicles 29:20, “Then David said to the whole assembly, “Give praise to the Lord your God!” And the entire assembly praised the Lord, the God of their ancestors, and they bowed low and knelt before the Lord and the king.”

Well which is it? Did the people kneel, lay prostrated on the ground, pay homage, give honor or worship? Did they worship just the Lord, or the king too? Notice that ONLY the inspired King James Bible has a comma, separating the people who worshipping God, and then David did too. As you can plainly see, the truth is obscured in the modern perversions. Please burn your modern English corrupt Bible versions.

Proverbs 30:5-6, “Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.”

The Shameful Sin Of Women Wearing Pants

2026-01-24T06:36:00.028-06:00

1st Timothy 2:9-10, “In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.”

Titus 2:4-5, “That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.”

In April of 2025, Pastor Brad Moffett of the FAMILY BAPTIST CHURCH in Pensacola treated I and my wife like garbage in his office. We had been invited for a different reason, but the unethical pastor did a Bait & Switch tactic on us, choosing instead to censure my website ministry and slander Pastor Jack Hyles (1926-2001).

Pastor Jack Hyles is our hero of the faith. My wife Alice was saved in 1975 while riding one of the church buses which the First Baptist Church of Hammond sent to Chicago each week to bring children and families to church. I was saved in 1979 under the preaching of a Hyles-Anderson College graduate at the Northland Baptist Church on Chicago's northside.

So, for Brad Moffett to falsely slander our hero Dr. Hyles wasn't good. In fact, it was downright evil. Pastor Brad (and his ungodly father who also slandered Pastor Hyles) have lost our respect. Today's ungodly pastors have a shameful cavalier attitude toward people. That is, they have a sinful haughty disregard for other's feelings, concerns or the truth.

Thankfully, God sees it all and is still on His throne (Proverbs 15:3; Ecclesiastes 5:8; Romans 12:10-21; Galatians 6:7; Hebrews 4:13). James 5:9, “Grudge not one against another, brethren, lest ye be condemned: behold, the judge standeth before the door.” They kicked us out of their church because they are wickedly holding a grudge against us. In hindsight, I now realize that they were sinfully holding a grudge against me since 2021 because they despise my fundamentalist Bible preaching on social media. These are wicked fools who are in serious trouble with the Lord.

The Contemptible Family Baptist Church In Pensacola

On April 30th, 2025, the shameful neo-evangelical pastor (Brad Moffett, age 37) had a stack of several dozen of my website ministry articles sitting on his desk, ready to condemn my Bible preaching and be combative. The coward left a door open without our permission, so some unknown man in n adjacent could hear everything. What a wicked pastor, jerk and immature man!

In particular, Brad and his ungodly pants-wearing rebellious wife were upset with my article titled: "Why A Christian Lady Ought Not Wear Pants." My truthful article irked them in the craw! It really hit home, because the pastor's wife and his mother both wears their wicked pants. This is the ungodly way of neo-evangelicals, following Christ afar off like backslidden Peter. But it gets much worse, they are not even saved at Family Baptist Church in Pensacola, those who adhere to the pastors' toxic lie that repentance means to turn away from your sinning to be saved. The church's official Statement of Faith requires that you “Repent of your sins” to get to Heaven.

Pastor Brad (whom I still love dearly since he was my pastor for 45 months) specifically attacked Dr. Jack Hyles for a quote I cited in the aforementioned article, in which Brother Hyles truthfully said: “I don't have a dirty mind, I have a man's mind.” Brad tore down Dr. Hyles, wickedly accusing him of having a carnal sinful mind for saying what he did. According to Brad, he himself doesn't have a dirty mind, and there is something spiritually wrong with Brother Hyles. I tell you truthfully, neither Brad Moffett nor his verbally-abusive father Bobby Moffett are worthy to shine Pastor Hyles' shoes!!! Those two ungodly brutish (lacking good sense) clowns have no business being pastors anywhere. They epitomize everything that is wrong with pastors and churches today, shaming the Lord's precious name.

Bobby Moffett bragged dozens of times in the 45 months that I attended their so-called "church" that he has started four churches during his 60-year lifetime. The pathetic truth is that Bobby has moved his group into four different buildings over the years, and the previous three alleged “churches” DO NOT EXIST today. So, factually, little “Bobby Boy” has started just one church, his church, not the Lord's church. The Lord's church doesn't kick truth-tellers out the door like they do at Family Baptist Church (Galatians 4:16). It literally is just their family and intimate friends, the “us four and no more” church. That's why the place is often 90% empty!

Sadly, Family Baptist Church is wrong on repentance, which makes them a religious cult. I never should have tolerated their damnable heresy as long as I did. That will NEVER happen again, I assure you! I was just lonely to have a church family, willing to overlook our doctrinal differences, but in hindsight I never meant a damn thing to any of them. Since the time that their ungodly pastors kicked I and my wife Alice out of their stupid church on June 22, 2025, all church members have cruelly blocked our phone number, abandoned and ostracized us, including on social media. This is how cults operate! God damns this cult (Galatians 1:6-9).

This is why ungodly neo-evangelicals like Bobby and Brad Moffett, their ungodly wives, and their ungodly worldly church despise and hate Pastor Jack Hyles, because his truthful Bible preaching PUTS THEM TO UTTER SHAME...

Pastor Jack Hyles Preaches On Modesty

Ungodly Rebellious Pastor's Wives

The two immodest pastor's wives refused to even welcome my wife when I and Alice got remarried last year. We had been married for 19 years (1987-2006), divorced for 19 years, and by God's grace we got remarried in May of 2025. We never dated anybody else while apart. I love Alice and am thankful that she has returned to me. God is faithful.

Sadly, Bobby and Brad Moffett despise and hate Pastor Jack Hyles and myself because we are FUNDAMENTALIST Baptist preachers, that they wouldn't touch with a 10-foot pole. Although I had never told them about my website ministry, they found it anyway. In hindsight, I now realize that from the very beginning in 2021 they held an ungodly grudge against me because of my fundamentalist Bible ministry. They despise Dr. Jack Hyles, who is still recognized as an influential leader in the independent fundamental Baptist church movement. I THANK GOD for Brother Hyles, a humble country boy from east Texas who grew up in poverty without a father. His dear godly mother Mattie Coystal Hyles (1887-1984) raised him.

Pastors' Bobby and Brad and their church (not the Lord's church) are shameful neo-evangelical apostates! They preach another gospel of partial faith in Christ plus turning from your past sinful ways. This is a FALSE GOSPEL! They wickedly bid Godspeed to damnable false prophets; namely, Ken Ham, Jeff Redlin, John Calvin, R.C. Sproul, Billy and Franklin Graham, et cetera. These men are all WRONG on God's simple plan of salvation. Family Baptist Church doesn't have any scheduled public door-to-door soulwinning (Acts 20:20). They are a disgrace to the name of Jesus Christ. When they boast of their own “love” from the pulpit, it is only done as a ruse to hide the hatred and unwilling to forgive that exists among them. At least the carnal church of Laodicea were correct on the Gospel.

It is a horrible sin for worldly pastor's wives to adorn themselves in pants, when the inspired Holy Bible plainly warns in 1st Peter 2:11, “Dearly beloved, I beseech you as strangers and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts, which war against the soul.”

When I and Alice met with Pastor Brad Moffett on April 30th, 2025, in his church office, he ignorantly dismissed my factual scientific claim that men's brains are wired differently than women's. Pastor Brad foolishly said, “Show me that in the Bible!” What a retarded thing for a pastor to say when I was speaking about biology! We couldn't believe how naïve, ignorant and brutish this young pastor (who was born 19 days after I and Alice were married in 1987) was being.

In our unpleasant conversation, as we were being ambushed by an ungodly neo-evangelical local pastor, to help Brad understand I kindly made reference to the 1992 book by John Gray titled: “Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus.” I mentioned this book in a sincere attempt to disprove Brad's denial that men and women are wired differently in regard to sexuality and lust, but again he ignorantly spouted, “Show me that in the Bible!” If this were a spiritual matter we could go to the Bible, but it's a simple matter of biology and science.

Contrary to Pastor Brad's woeful ignorance and foolishness, please read this accurate information from Psychology Today...

“Men are often sexually aroused by sight due to their brains being wired to respond quickly to visual stimuli, which activates areas related to sexual arousal. This tendency is thought to be linked to evolutionary factors, where visual cues are associated with fertility and reproductive potential.”

For men, erotic stimuli immediately activates the parts of their brains related to getting an erection.
Because men are sexually stimulated visually, many adult sites targeting men focus on body parts.
Unlike women, men's sexual arousal can exist totally independent of a relationship. [emphasis added]

SOURCE: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/evolution-of-the-self/201205/the-triggers-of-sexual-desire-men-vs-women

So, we have confirmation from the secular world that indeed, men and women are wired differently in their brains concerning sexuality and lust. This is why it is imperative that women adorn themselves in MODEST APPAREL as the inspired Word of God commands. For a female to wear modest clothing is not optional, it is a commandment from almighty God!

I am so disgusted with Erika Kirk (Charlie Kirk's widow). She professes to be a Christian who loves Jesus, yet she and the ungodly immodest women she is going on tour with in 2026 (the pathetic 'MAKE HEAVEN CROWDED TOUR') all dress like harlots. Here's the 'GIRLS GONE BIBLE' website, in which you can see Angela Halili and Arielle Reitsma wearing tight sexy pants. Since they look like lesbians the way they are holding hands and ogling each other, I searched online with the names to see if they are queer, which led me to the New York Post. The lewd provocative sensual images of them hanging out in nightclubs are so ungodly that I refuse to even link to them, because it is shameful. Psalms 101:3, “I will set no wicked thing before mine eyes: I hate the work of them that turn aside; it shall not cleave to me.”

Don't you dare tell me as a pastor's wife that God approves of your immodest apparel (pants, Spandex and shorts), when weak men are going to prison everywhere because of “fleshly lusts, which war against the soul” (1st Peter 2:11b). A pastor's wife who wears pants in public is a potential homewrecker! Such ungodly women have blood on their hands and the Lord will hold them accountable for the lusts and broken homes they caused.

Foolish Pastor Defends His Wife's Provocative Clothing

On April 30th, 2025, Pastor Brad in his office attacked my Bible preaching against women wearing pants. Please understand that NOT ONCE did I ever make an issue (nor even bring up the issue) of women wearing pants in all the 45 months that I attended their damn cult. IT WAS THEM, not me, who raised concerns, censuring my faithful righteous preaching. You see, you don't have to give up the world dear saint of God, you just carry a Bible and live godly in Christ Jesus and the world will give you up (2nd Timothy 3:12).

According to Brad Moffett, it shouldn't matter if his wife wears pants because the Bible says in Galatians 5:16, “This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.” Brad literally said that since a man who walks in the Spirit won't lust, it doesn't matter if his wife wears pants. What an irresponsible, reckless and ungodly thing to say and a poor attitude. Clearly, Brad is henpecked by his wicked wife. Well guess what folks, it DOES MATTER TO GOD if a pastor' wife wears pants! GET RIGHT WITH GOD!!!

What saith the Scripture? 1st Peter 2:11, “Dearly beloved, I beseech you as strangers and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts, which war against the soul.” The Bible calls the lusts of the flesh a "war against the soul." Yet, that stupid ungodly pastor and his spoiled brat for a wife think they know more than God. While men are struggling in A WAR AGAINST THE SOUL with lust for the opposite sex, ungodly pastor's wives are deliberately wearing pants (and other immodest clothing) to tempt struggling men, making it easier for Satan to destroy them (1st Peter 5:8). You better believe that God cares how women dress!

Pastor Brad brought up Deuteronomy 22:5, “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.” Brad actually tried to use Scottish men wearing kilts as justification for his wife wearing pants. Do you see what Pastor Brad and his immodest wife are doing? They are skirting God's Word (no pun intended). That is, they are sinfully trying to avoid responsibility for the way women dress and appear in public.

Proverbs 7:10, “And, behold, there met him a woman with the attire of an harlot, and subtil of heart.” There is the “attire of an harlot.” A century ago only prostitutes wore pants in public. A century ago, it was uncommon for women to wear pants in public, and those who did, like prostitutes, often faced social stigma.

By God's grace, I am going to go to seed preaching the inspired Holy Bible against worldly women and girls wearing their ungodly shorts, halter tops, pants, Spandex and bikinis in public. MODESTY MATTERS! MORALITY MATTERS! 1st Corinthians 6:20, “For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.” Dear reader, there is no controversy if you believe the inspired Holy Bible. 1st Timothy 2:9a, “In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel...”

Kindly said, for a reckless knuckleheaded pastor like Brad Moffett to allege that 1st Timothy 2:9 doesn't forbid a Christian woman to wear her ungodly pants, is the same thing as saying that Exodus 20:13 (“Thou shalt not kill”) doesn't forbid a mother from having an abortion. Do you see the word “abortion”? I don't, so that must exclude abortion from God's command not to kill, right. This is the incompetent lame theology of Brad and Bobby Moffett and the Family Baptist Church in Pensacola. I say, SHAME ON YOU ALL! 1st Samuel 24:12, “The LORD judge between me and thee, and the LORD avenge me of thee: but mine hand shall not be upon thee.”

Omissions In The Modern Bible Perversions

2026-01-17T12:51:00.000-06:00

2nd Corinthians 2:17, “For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.” Nothing has changed much in 2,000 years. The Bible says there were not just a few, but many, wicked people who corrupted the Word of God in the New Testament. The world has several billion more people today and there have never been more Bible corrupters.

RIGHT DOCTRINE MATTERS!

Shame On Any Pastor Who Doesn't Warn People About Satan's Corrupt Seed

2026-01-10T15:12:00.003-06:00

2nd Corinthians 2:17, “For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.”

One of the most shameful things I've ever heard a preacher say is when Brother John Wilkerson in January of 2013 was candidating for the position of pastor at the First Baptist Church of Hammond.

When asked by a church member for his position on the modern Bible revisions, Brother Wilkerson said that he felt it was “disrespectful” to people and could potentially “offend” and “do more damage than good” to baby believers than help them, if he criticized their modern Bible revisions. I wrote a needful article about it years ago to expose such wicked indifference.

Imagine with me if you will, John Wilkerson catching a man urinating in the baby's milk bottles in the church nursery. What do you think he would do? Would he stay quiet for concern that saying anything might offend new mothers and they'd leave the church? Would he stay quiet to avoid being “disrespectful” toward others? Yet, when it comes to Satan poisoning the eternally inspired Words of God that can damn a soul to the Lake of Fire, he chooses to remain silent. Respectfully said, that's a coward's attitude!

I contend that Satan's minion tampering with God's Word to remove the godhead, attack Jesus' deity, pervert the meaning of repentance and corrupt God's Word is infinitely worse than some deranged weirdo urinating in the baby's feeding bottles in a church nursery. Pardon my crude illustration, but it gets the point across.

Sadly, what Brother Wilkerson was really showing the church (and the world since they uploaded the candidacy service to YouTube) is that he is either woefully ignorant of the dangers of Satan's Bible revisions, or else he just doesn't care about the purity of God's Word because he is indifferent. Either way, shame on him!

Furthermore, SHAME on the First Baptist Church of Hammond for denying the inspiration of the King James Bible since 2008, undoing all the decades of faithful Bible preaching by Dr. Jack Hyles (1926-2001), who faithfully pastored the church in Hammond from 1959 to 2001 when he graduated to Heaven.

“Every word in this Bible is inspired by God almighty!”—Dr. Jack Hyles, “A Friend At Midnight”)

“The only inspired Words of God are in the King James Bible!”—Dr. Jack Hyles, “THE REAL BATTLE!”

Does Willful Sin Prove A Person Is Not Really Saved?

2025-12-31T07:23:00.002-06:00

Romans 6:1, “What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?”

Kindly, I found this disturbing meme today on Facebook, which is blatant false teaching. OSAS (Once Saved Always Saved) is 100% biblical. This person no doubt means well, but they are tragically still caught between works and grace (which means they are not born again)...

Blatant False Doctrine

Salvation is not a reward for the righteous, it is a gift for the guilty.

Salvation is not doing your best, it is having Christ's best put to your account through receiving Him by faith.

Turning away from sinful ways would be a work. Faith puts all of the merit where it belongs, on the object of our faith, Jesus and His work.

The true Gospel always points you to CHRIST; a false gospel always points to YOU.

There is such a thing as a “carnal” Christian (Romans 7:14).

The new birth is a supernatural miracle of God in response to a man's faith in Jesus Christ (John 1:12-13), which has absolutely nothing to do with behavior modification. A believer “should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world” (Titus 2:12b), but just because they don't doesn't mean they are not saved. It means they are spiritually immature or backslidden, but this is a matter of discipleship and not sonship. The Bible is full of sinful saints who failed to please God, shaming the Lord's name and leaving a trail of collateral damage because of their sins. Their lives were a trainwreck! (e.g., Lot, Esau, Jacob and his sons by Leah, Saul, Samson, David and his son Solomon, Absalom, the adulterous man and his father's wife in 1st Corinthians 5:1-5, Demas who loved this present world, Ananias and Sapphira who lied to the Holy Spirit, the carnal church at Corinth, et cetera). Need I go on?

Pastor M.R. DeHaan (1891-1965) said it very well...

"There is a vast difference between coming to Jesus for salvation and coming after Jesus for service. Coming to Christ makes one a believer, while coming after Christ makes one a disciple. All believers are not disciples. To become a believer one accepts the invitation of the Gospel, to be a disciple one obeys the challenge to a life of dedicated service and separation. Salvation comes through the sacrifice of Christ; discipleship comes only by sacrifice of self and surrender to His call for devoted service. Salvation is free, but discipleship involves paying the price of a separated walk. Salvation can't be lost because it depends upon God's faithfulness, but discipleship can be lost because it depends upon our faithfulness." —Pastor M.R. DeHaan, “Hebrews”; Zondervan Publishing House; 1959 (p. 117)

That would be a great quote to memorize dear reader.

Like it or not, OSAS (Once Saved Always Saved) can be used as a License to Sin if someone chooses to do so. Of course, God will scourge and chastise His disobedient children (Hebrews 12:6-8). Proverbs 3:12, “For whom the LORD loveth he correcteth; even as a father the son in whom he delighteth.” NO ONE has God's permission or blessing to commit sin, just because they are assured eternal life through faith alone in the Gospel, but if they do God's saving grace will abound all that much more. Romans 6:1, “What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?”

The Apostle Paul admitted that he regularly struggled with sin, doing the sinful things that he didn't want to do (Romans 7:14-25). It is true that only God knows someone's heart (1st Samuel 16:7). The truth is that ALL of God's children still live in sin. We may clean up our life like prettying up a muddy pig, but we are still filthy sinful pigs, even though we may be redeemed and promised eternal life (Romans 6:47).

That is to say, the only righteousness that any saint possesses is the imputed righteous of God, which is obtained only through faith in Jesus (Philippians 3:9). Apart from God's imputed righteousness by faith in Christ, we have no righteousness of our own to please God. Our best works are filth to God (Isaiah 64:6).

I humbly reject the heresy by some preachers who say that a Christian no longer has an old nature. While it is biblically true that every born again child of God has a completely new nature, indwelt by the Holy Spirit of God (Romans 8:9; 1st John 3:24); it is also biblically true that the sinful flesh and the old carnal nature are also still present.

That is why in Ephesians 4:22-24, the Apostle Paul exhorts the believers in the church at Ephesus to “put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts. And be renewed in the spirit of your mind; And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.” If this were an automatic thing caused by salvation, then Paul would not have exhorted these Christians to put off the old man and instead put on the new man, which is in Christ.

Pilgrim's Progress author John Bunyan (1628-1688) said these edifying words of truth...

“If you do not put a difference between justification wrought by the man Christ without and sanctification wrought by the Spirit of Christ within, you are not able to divide the Word aright; but contrariwise, you corrupt the Word of God, and cast stumbling blocks before the people.” —Evangelist John Bunyan

In other words, Lordship Salvation is a lie of Satan. You cannot combine service with salvation without perverting the Gospel of free grace. Faith is the only righteous thing that we can do.

Some corrupt pastors falsely teach that we are not saved by works, but faith works. That sounds nice, but it is simply untrue biblically. While it is true that we are not saved by works, it is false doctrine that faith always produces works. The Apostle James said that faith without works is dead, but it is still saving faith. James writes about being justified in the eyes of men by works, not God. Paul writes about being justified in the sight of God by faith alone (Romans 4:1-7).

I also humbly reject the damnable heresy being today today in corrupt religious institutions like Bob Jones University and Pensacola Christian College, which says that justification, sanctification and glorification are a “package deal” that cannot be separated. Consequently, these false teachers say that you're not really saved unless you're living a holy sanctified life. This is evil Calvinism dear reader, and it is deadly. John Calvin (1509-1564) is burning in the fires of hell forever, having died in his damnable counterfeit plan of salvation.

So also is Calvin's contemporary (even though they never met) Martin Luther (1493-1546) burning in Hell because of his reliance upon sacramental salvation.

Saving faith does not automatically produce works as perverse Calvinists claim. Many believers will have ZERO works at the Judgment Seat of Christ, evidenced by the man in 1st Corinthians 3:11-15 who was saved, yet so by fire. That is, he barely escaped going to Hell because of his faith. 1st Corinthians 3:15, “If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.”

Clearly then, going to Heaven has nothing to do with human reformation or works. Salvation is the free gift of God (Ephesians 2:8-9). Contrary to the message of this meme, just because a professed Christians chooses to live in open sin doesn't mean they don't know God, or that they are not born again.

Neither does it mean that they are in jeopardy of going to Hell. OSAS is absolutely true! You can call it a 'License to Sin' of you want, but the truth is that you and I sin just like everyone else. Just because we may sin less than someone else, doesn't make us any less sinful or more righteous than the vilest sinner in God's sight (James 2:10). Only the precious blood of Jesus sets us apart (1st Peter 1:18-19). We are all horrible sinners and apart from Christ's sacrifice on Calvary's cross, burial and His glorious resurrection from the dead (1st Corinthians 15:1-6), we'd all be going to Hell to burn forever (Revelation 20:11-15, 21:8).

Thank you for reading my ministry blog. To God alone by the glory (John 15:1-5).

Kirk Cameron No Longer Believes In A Literal Burning Hell With Fire And Brimstone

2025-12-09T10:01:00.005-06:00

Revelation 20:12-15, “And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.”

Dear reader, you are a FOOL if you deny that a literal Hell exists—with actual burning fire where all the wicked throughout human civilization (who die in their sins without Christ) will spend eternity suffering day and night without hope, rest or relief.

That being said, speaking of fools, former Hollywood actor turning evangelist Kirk Cameron announced this week that he no longer believes in a literal Hell. Sadly, the cult of Seventh-Day Adventism (who also deny that Hell exists) are singing praises to Kirk Cameron.

The Bible has more to say about Hell than Heaven. Only a fool assumes that Hell is a myth. Only a darn fool assumes that Hell in the Bible is only symbolic of death. Jesus tells the true story in Luke 16:19-31 of Lazarus And The Rich Man who both died. Angels came to escort Lazarus to his eternal abode; but the rich died in his sleep and suddenly woke up in Hell, suffering in torments of fire. We know this is NOT a parable for a few reasons:

Jesus uses proper nouns (Abraham and Lazarus). Jesus never used proper nouns; such as people's names. When telling a parable, Jesus always spoke in vague terms (e.g., a certain man went into a far country). In this true story He is being specific.
Jesus announced when He was going to tell a parable, which He doesn't do here.
Jesus explained His parables afterwards, which He doesn't do here.
Jesus would be guilty of misrepresenting the truth if He wasn't being literal. John 14:2, “In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.”

Contrary to Kirk Cameron's heretical view of annihilation upon death, the inspired Holy Bible says that the rich man existed in the afterlife, and he was suffering in horrific pain and misery...

Luke 16:19-23, “There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day: And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores, And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried; And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.”

In sharp contrast to Jehovah's Witnesses, Seventh-Day Adventists and Kirk Cameron, the Holy Bible warns that there is a literal PLACE called Hell, where all Christ-rejecters will burn in fire and brimstone (sulfur) for ever and ever (Revelation 21:8).

Kirk Cameron Teaches Heresy About Hell

No one is partying in Hell. It will be the most horrifying place imaginable, and knowing that even after one billion years, it's not even the beginning, will be most horrifying of all. For billions and trillions of years, you will quench for a drop of water, but won't find any.

Re:14:10-11, “The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.”

I'm not going to risk my eternal soul by going against God's Word. I got saved in 1980 as a 13 year old young man because I was afraid of burning in Hell. Fearing Hell is a perfectly fine reason to come to Jesus Christ for eternal life. John 6:47, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.”

Kirk Cameron has radically changed his views in recent months for the worse. If you take the Holy Bible at face value, then you must concede that there is a literal place called Hell that burns with real fire and real pain and suffering. If God allows suffering in this earthly life, there is no reason to assume that there won't be suffering in the afterlife for the wicked.

Psalms 9:17, “The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.” Some skeptical Hell-deniers will say that the Hebrew word Sheol for “Hell” in this passage only means “grave.” The Hebrew meaning of Sheol is “the realm of the dead,” which does not exclude Heaven or Hell, nor does it suggest annihilation either.

If Hell is merely the grave, then this Bible passage makes absolutely no sense. What would be the significance of warning that the wicked shall be turned into Hell, if the righteous and the wicked go to the same place? Clearly, the inspired Word of God implies that the wicked do not go to the same place in the afterlife as the righteous.

Doesn't The Bible Teach To Help Illegal Aliens?

2025-12-06T13:19:00.007-06:00

Exodus 22:21, “Thou shalt neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.”

Leviticus 19:33-34, “And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him. But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.”

Someone asked me today if Exodus 22:21 and Leviticus 19:33-34 teach that Christians are obligated to support ILLEGAL immigration into the United States. ...

Leviticus 19:33-34, “And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him. But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.”

The Hebrew word for "sojourn" in Leviticus 19:33 means "to turn aside from the road to lodge as A GUEST" (temporarily passing through the land). This is VERY DIFFERENT than some bastard invading your town to STAY PERMANENTLY, expecting YOU to financially support him and his whole damn family (food, clothes, health care, housing, amenities, transportation, phone, education, et cetera). Only a very wilfully IGNORANT and WICKED person would even try to wrest (corrupt) the Holy Bible to justify ILLEGAL immigration. DEPORT THEM ALL NOW!!!

These passages of Scripture in the Old Testament deal with befriending strangers who TEMPORARILY lodge (sojourn) in the land, not shady criminals who violate U.S. laws by slithering into our country like snakes during the night, and then expect YOU and ME to take care of their sorry hides. I learned a long time ago that anything can be justified, no matter how evil or unethical.

In the 1850s, particularly during the California Gold Rush, violence against Native Americans increased significantly as settlers encroached on their lands. Ken Burns' documentary "The West" explores these events, highlighting the tragic consequences of westward expansion and the conflicts that arose between settlers and Indigenous peoples. You can freely watch the 9-part heartbreaking series at PBS...

THE WEST
(by historian Ken Burns)

Basically, whites in California were permitted legally to scalp, torture and murder the Indians, rape the females and males of all ages, steal their possessions and ruthlessly slaughter their children. Literally, the whites could do whatever evil they imagined to the Indians, and they cruelly did. It was open-season on the native Indians; all justified in the name of the law. Truth is more stranger than fiction, and more horrifying.

The inspired King James Bible plainly teaches to submit to the higher powers in Romans chapter 13. Anyone who ILLEGALLY enters into the United States is a CRIMINAL according to our existing laws. The sad truth is that the illegal invaders have ZERO regard for the laws of our land. Tens of millions of illegals have bankrupted hundreds of U.S. hospitals, mooch off the government, cannot speak a single word of English, complain and diss our country, commit violent crimes, fill our prions, and many of them are convicted felons who should be in prison. DEPORT THEM ALL!!! Let justice be done.

I wish that all of these liberal left-wing communist-sympathizing idiots who criticize I.C.E. and hate President Donald Trump for simply enforcing existing laws, could personally be forced to pay for all of the HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS in welfare freebies (taxpayer dollars in the form of more outstanding debt) being given to the lawbreakers. If liberals lost their homes, their food, their health insurance, their safety, their privacy and were forced into utter poverty because of illegals parasiting off them, they'd think very differently. Liberal bleeding-heart Democrats love to spend other people's money! The old adage is true: If you succeed without sacrificing, it is only because someone else sacrificed without succeeding.

Also, the Hebrew word for "stranger" in Exodus 22:21 and Leviticus 19:33-34 means "a guest." Exodus 22:21, “Thou shalt neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.” This Scripture passage has absolutely nothing to do with criminals who illegally invade our country, and then demand that the U.S. government financially provide employment, healthcare, food, diapers, clothing, phones, transportation, housing, education and a better life for the whole family. It is asinine to pervert the Holy Bible in an ungodly attempt to coerce Americans to support illegal aliens. DEPORT THEM ALL!

ILLEGAL ALIENS are not guests who came to temporarily visit the United States, they are PARASITES who came here to STAY and MOOCH OFF AMERICANS! We've got tens of millions of struggling American citizens today who simply cannot survive on insulting meager minimum wages (which are far below the poverty level). The federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour is significantly below the poverty line, which is set at $15,650 for a single adult in 2025. This gap means that full-time workers earning minimum wage cannot afford basic necessities, highlighting the need for a higher living wage.

Illegal aliens complicate the situation, taking away millions of jobs. The hotel industry employs a significant number of ILLEGAL ALIENS, with estimates suggesting around 137,000 in U.S. hotels, 225,000 in agriculture and 1,500,000 in construction. This reliance on ILLEGAL ALIENS deeply hurts American who cannot find a decent paying job. We're in deep doo doo in the United States, and I assure you thing swill only get much worse.

And by the way, I am sick and tired of the ungodly lying mainstream press (aka, “presstitutes”) dishonestly referring to illegal aliens as “undocumented immigrants.” No Sir, they are guilty criminals! Alcoholism is not a disease, it is the horrible sin of drunkenness! Abortion is not healthcare, it is the abominable sin and heinous crime of first-degree, premediated, cold-blooded, murder! Homosexuality is not an alternative lifestyle, it is the vile unnatural sin of sodomy! Wicked sinners can redefine terms all they want, but they cannot escape the wrath of God on Judgment Day. Job 20:5, “That the triumphing of the wicked is short, and the joy of the hypocrite but for a moment?”

The inspired Word of God nowhere teaches that Americans (let alone Christians) are obligated to support strangers who illegally sneak into OUR COUNTRY to PERMANENTLY STAY. The Bible says not to oppress the stranger (the guest) who comes for a visit to TEMPORARILY LODGE FOR A SHORT TIME, it doesn't say to support them!

There is nothing more dangerous than the inspired Word of God in the hands of an idiot. Christians should not support illegal immigration, anymore than we would support stealing, adultery or murder.