<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Afro-Netizen</title><link>http://www.afro-netizen.com/</link><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Afro-netizen" /><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:47:08 PDT</lastBuildDate><generator>TypePad http://www.typepad.com/</generator><feedburner:info uri="afro-netizen" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><description></description><media:copyright>© 2006 Afro-Netizen All rights reserved</media:copyright><media:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</media:keywords><media:category scheme="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">News &amp; Politics</media:category><media:category scheme="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">Society &amp; Culture/History</media:category><media:category scheme="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">Technology/Podcasting</media:category><itunes:owner><itunes:email>podcast@afro-netizen.com</itunes:email><itunes:name>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle><itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics" /><itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"><itunes:category text="History" /></itunes:category><itunes:category text="Technology"><itunes:category text="Podcasting" /></itunes:category><item><title>Invisible Capital and Why We Need to Democratize Entrepreneurial Opportunity</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/pGYefKLp1Pg/invisiblecapitaltebr.html</link><category>Business &amp; Entrepreneurship</category><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Economy/Finance</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>Chris Rabb</category><category>commonwealth enterprise</category><category>democracy</category><category>entrepreneurship</category><category>green economy</category><category>invisible capital</category><category>new ventures</category><category>shared prosperity</category><category>social enterprise</category><category>startups</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:47:08 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef01543403698f970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>By </strong><a href="http://www.invisiblecapital.com/abouttheauthor" target="_blank"><strong>Chris Rabb</strong></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Republished courtesy of <a href="http://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/?p=4092" target="_blank" title="The European Business Review | July-August 2011">The European Business Review</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><em><a href="http://www.invisiblecapital.com" target="_self" title="Invisible Capital">Invisible capital</a> is the  toolkit of our skills, knowledge, networks, experiences and other  resources, along with the set of assets we were born with.</em></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef014e8a23662f970d-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="Courtesy of The European Business Review" class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef014e8a23662f970d" height="233" src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef014e8a23662f970d-500wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" title="Courtesy of The European Business Review" width="350"></img></a> Invisible capital is the toolkit of our  skills, knowledge, networks, experiences and other resources, along with  the set of assets we were born with: our race and gender, our family’s  wealth and status, the type of community in which we were raised, and  the education we had as children.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Some of these assets are ﬁxed—we  cannot change who our parents are. Others are in our power to acquire or  modify. What makes them “invisible” is that our society rarely  acknowledges that entrepreneurial opportunities—and thus entrepreneurial  outcomes— are greatly inﬂuenced by these assets.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">You can predict which entrepreneurs will  succeed with a fairly high degree of probability if you know some basic  facts about them. And on the surface, race, gender, and the educational  attainment and/or household income of their families seem like pretty  obvious factors. It’s simply easier for some people to succeed. The  playing ﬁeld is not level.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">If you want to become an entrepreneur,  or help other entrepreneurs succeed, you have to be familiar with the  terrain of the playing ﬁeld because it is neither smooth nor level.  Additionally, you have to understand the rules of the game. Those rules  are not written anywhere. A rulebook has yet to be written by the  institutions’ most vocal and inﬂuential regarding the cause of  entrepreneurship.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">To understand the lay of the land and be  able to effectively navigate the often hidden obstacles on a playing  ﬁeld, you have to learn how the unseen forces that shape entrepreneurial  opportunity work, in ways that even the “winners” in business may not  fully appreciate.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Platforms to access versus proxies for success</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">When we limit “success” to such things  as occupational prestige, higher education, income, and so on, too often  we discount the impact of strong networks and other forms of access  that correlate to increased upward mobility for successive generations.  As the saying goes, “It’s not what you know, it’s who you know!” Of  course, this expression is overly simplistic—and good connections alone  rarely are enough for prolonged success in any ﬁeld.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The truth is that there is a range of  invisible factors that give some an unequal advantage on the  entrepreneurial playing ﬁeld. Successful entrepreneurs in the U.S., the  data show, have a toolkit that tends to be more broadly valued in some  communities than others, but the all-important mix of these assets is  the invisible capital (or lack thereof) that helps or hinders  entrepreneurial viability.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px; text-align: justify;"><strong>“Invisible  capital is not a proxy for racism, sexism, classism, xenophobia, or  heterosexism. Invisible capital is also no substitute for the  entrepreneurial trinity of hard work, ingenuity, and positive attitude.  But these qualities are often prerequisites rather than predictors of  sustained viability in business.”</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Let me be clear: invisible capital is  not a proxy for racism, sexism, classism, xenophobia, or heterosexism.  People who are on the receiving end of one or more of these “isms” are  not powerless, nor are they devoid of invisible capital. Indeed, they  have the capacity to build invisible capital strategically despite the  clear social liabilities they may bear through no fault of their own.  Invisible capital is also no substitute for the entrepreneurial trinity  of hard work, ingenuity, and positive attitude. But these qualities are  often prerequisites rather than predictors of sustained viability in  business.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Invisible capital is not simply how big  your Rolodex is or how many times you’ve traveled abroad. It is not just  knowing that EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, tax,  depreciation and amortization, knowing how to dress when meeting a loan  ofﬁcer, what degrees you’ve earned, or the level of your digital  literacy.</p>
<p>It is all of those things and more.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Invisible capital revealed</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Anyone can acquire invisible capital.  Depending on the entrepreneurial opportunity, which aspects of invisible  capital you need and in what proportion may change dramatically. If  Woody Allen is right and just showing up is indeed 90 percent of  success, then some portion of that must be attributed to the invisible  capital that informs us where, when, how, and why we must show up in the  ﬁrst place.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Without equality of opportunity, we  don’t know what (or who) represents “the best”. We can only safely know  what the best is based on the rickety system we have inherited—along  with those rare but highly visible exceptions society uses to validate  the rule.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">To fully acknowledge the importance of  invisible capital in expanding opportunity for entrepreneurs, it’s vital  to understand more about the different types of capital that constitute  invisible capital.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">At ﬁrst glance, capital is just a synonym for money. But it’s not.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Read more <a href="http://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/?p=4092" target="_blank" title="Invisible Capital and Why We Need to Democratize Entrepreneurial Opportunity">here</a>.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Entrepreneurship that promotes shared prosperity in this post-economic meltdown era seems more (rhetorically) popular than ever. As soon as we truly understand and account for the social context within which economic opportunity and innovation merge, our entrepreneurial literacy will be fuller, our capacity to build and support scalable, sustainable enterprises more robust, and the metrics with which we assess progress and prosperity abundantly more meaningful. Recognizing the imperative to democratize entrepreneurial opportunity should be the first step toward these lofty, yet attainable goals.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2011/07/invisiblecapitaltebr.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Want an Equitable Economy? Start Building One Based on Abundance</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/FkI-FZtIZkc/want-an-equitable-economy-start-building-one-based-on-abundance.html</link><category>Business &amp; Entrepreneurship</category><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>Chris Rabb</category><category>Colorlines</category><category>commonwealth enterprise</category><category>entrepreneurship</category><category>invisible capital</category><category>new venture creation</category><category>racial wealth gap</category><category>small business</category><category>startups</category><category>wealth</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:43:11 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef01538eb83614970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>By <a href="http://www.invisiblecapital.com/abouttheauthor" target="_blank" title="About the Author | Invisible Capital">Chris Rabb</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></p>
<p><strong>Colorlines.com<br></strong></p>
<p>Something’s gone horribly wrong economically in this country,  so highly regarded across the globe for its spirit of enterprise and  golden opportunity. And while it’s true that from the greatest  challenges arise the greatest opportunities, it is also true that things  are getting objectively worse for already struggling communities, who  for generations have known unemployment and poverty as norms.</p>
<p>Still, even though fewer Americans than ever before are likely to  achieve the promise of upward mobility for themselves or their kids,  Americas cling to the mythology of meritocracy—or, as comic provocateur  George Carlin once quipped, an American Dream that one needs to be  asleep to believe in. Entrepreneurship is the most celebrated version of  that dream.</p>
<p>“From our first days as a nation, we have put our faith in free  markets and free enterprise as the engine of America’s wealth and  prosperity,” Obama declared as the opening premise of his  deficit-reduction plan in April. “More than citizens of any other  country, we are rugged individualists, a self-reliant people.”</p>
<p>If you work hard enough, have a good enough idea and a positive  attitude, you have the recipe for success—or so the narrative of  American wealth goes.</p>
<p>It’s simply not true.</p>
<p><em>Read more <a href="http://colorlines.com/archives/2011/05/invisible_capital_and_commonwealth_enterprise.html" target="_blank" title="Want an Equitable Economy? Start Building One Based on Abundance">here</a> at Colorlines.com.</em></p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Something’s gone horribly wrong economically in this country, so highly regarded across the globe for its spirit of enterprise and golden opportunity. And while it’s true that from the greatest challenges arise the greatest opportunities, it is also true that things are getting objectively worse for already struggling communities, who for generations have known unemployment and poverty as norms.

Still, even though fewer Americans than ever before are likely to achieve the promise of upward mobility for themselves or their kids, Americas cling to the mythology of meritocracy—or, as comic provocateur George Carlin once quipped, an American Dream that one needs to be asleep to believe in. Entrepreneurship is the most celebrated version of that dream.

“From our first days as a nation, we have put our faith in free markets and free enterprise as the engine of America’s wealth and prosperity,” Obama declared as the opening premise of his deficit-reduction plan in April. “More than citizens of any other country, we are rugged individualists, a self-reliant people.”

If you work hard enough, have a good enough idea and a positive attitude, you have the recipe for success—or so the narrative of American wealth goes.

It’s simply not true.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2011/05/want-an-equitable-economy-start-building-one-based-on-abundance.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Dr. Mario Obledo: A Leader in Death Penalty Abolition</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/KsIijxHwOBI/dr-mario-obledo-a-leader-in-death-penalty-abolition.html</link><category>Death/In Memoriam</category><category>Politics</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:58:54 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0133f5cc1bc6970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>By Margaret Summers</strong><br><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></p>
<p><br>This Veterans Day week, I’ve been remembering my first impressions of civil rights leader, death penalty abolitionist, and Korean War veteran, the late Dr. Mario Guerra Obledo. He was courtly. Reserved. Quiet. Polite. Respectful. I don’t remember his exact height, but to me he stood far above everyone around him.<br><br>One of 12 children born to Mexican immigrants in San Antonio, Texas, Dr. Obledo enlisted in the Navy in 1951, serving on a ship in radar technology. After the war, Dr. Obledo went back to his home state. He earned his undergraduate degree in pharmacy from the University of Texas in Austin, and later, his law degree from St. Mary’s University in San Antonio.<br><br>Like many veterans of color, Dr. Obledo returned from fighting a war for democracy and freedom in another country to find that such rights and freedoms were not always upheld for people of color in the United States. Pete Tijerina, another Latino war veteran, returned from combat with an idea to start a civil rights organization in support of Latinos. He met Dr. Obledo at a social function. With help from a $2.2 million dollar Ford Foundation grant and assistance from the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the two veterans founded MALDEF, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund. MALDEF launched Dr. Obledo’s civil rights activism.  <br><br>Years later, when I met Dr. Obledo in the mid-1980s, he was the President of the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), the nation’s oldest and largest Latino civil rights organization. I was a reporter, covering Congress for a local Washington, D.C. radio station. I interviewed him during that period after his news conferences or his testimony before Congressional hearings concerning racism against Latinos or U.S. immigration policy reform.<br><br>I wasn’t involved in the death penalty abolition movement yet, so I had no idea that Dr. Obledo was an abolitionist. He worked diligently to end the death penalty in California, where the National Coalition of Hispanic Organizations, which he headed and co-founded, is based, and in other states where it is still practiced.<br><br>Ten years ago, in his capacity as the President of the Coalition, Dr. Obledo signed an open letter to President Clinton, calling for a moratorium on federal executions. Other signers included leaders of the ACLU, NAACP, the National Organization for Women, and the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights. The December 4, 2000 letter was a response to a Department of Justice survey of the federal death penalty authorization process. The survey revealed that, of the federal capital defendants against whom the Attorney General authorized seeking the death penalty, 69% were Hispanic and African American (18% and 51% respectively), while only 25% were white.<br><br>“We are aware of your support for the death penalty under some circumstances and we are not asking that you change your long-held position,” the letter read in part. “We are asking only that you prevent an unconscionable event in American history — executing individuals while the government is still determining whether gross unfairness has led to their death sentences.<br><br>In 2006, Dr. Obledo served on the advisory board of the American Bar Association Death Penalty Moratorium Implementation Project, which examined whether the death penalty was administered fairly and with due process. To the extent flaws were identified in states’ death penalty systems, states could use the Project’s findings in reforming their systems, impose moratoriums, and/or launch more comprehensive self-examinations of death penalty-related laws and processes. The Project examined death penalty systems in Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee.<br><br>While on the advisory board, Dr. Obledo illustrated how racial and economic disparities in the application of death sentences stem from years of racial and economic discrimination. “I think they should do away with the death penalty,” he said. “Most people convicted are minorities. People of color, or minorities. Only the poor people get executed. The people with money never get executed. That’s why the system should be changed. You would make sure no injustice would occur.”<br><br>As is the case with African Americans, Latinos are often disproportionately represented on death row. Approximately 11% of death row prisoners nationally are Latino, while Latinos comprise 15% of the U.S. population.  In California, the percentage of Latinos sentenced to death and incarcerated on death row is increasing.  According to a report by ACLU of Northern California, “Death in Decline 2009” Latinos comprised 50% of new death sentences in 2007, 38% of death sentences in 2008, and 31% of death sentences in 2009. There is no documented information regarding what is behind these troubling statistics.  However, the report notes that the lack of Latinos on California’s juries and the sentencing decisions made by California’s District Attorneys might be among the driving factors.<br><br>Dr. Obledo’s contributions to death penalty abolition and civil rights were many.  Dr. Obledo died suddenly this August after a heart attack at age 78. While others undoubtedly remember and laud Dr. Obledo for his civil rights activism in LULAC, MALDEF and the National Coalition of Hispanic Organizations, I will always remember, and appreciate, his having devoted a portion of his busy life trying to end the barbaric, racially and economically biased and ineffective crime-fighting tool that is capital punishment.<br><br><em>Margaret Summers is the Director of Communications for the </em>National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty.<br><br></p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This Veterans Day week, I’ve been remembering my first impressions of civil rights leader, death penalty abolitionist, and Korean War veteran, the late Dr. Mario Guerra Obledo. He was courtly. Reserved. Quiet. Polite. Respectful. I don’t remember his exact height, but to me he stood far above everyone around him.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/11/dr-mario-obledo-a-leader-in-death-penalty-abolition.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>It's Time to be Bold: Democrats and Black America</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/p1gh3mKAiXs/its-time-to-be-bold-democrats-and-black-america.html</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:34:00 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef013488cfec77970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>&lt;i&gt;Originally &lt;a href="http://www.theroot.com/views/its-time-be-bold-democrats-and-black-america?page=0,0"&gt;published on the Root&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/i&gt;<br><br>In the wake of large Republican gains in this week's election, many in the media are relating a familiar and predictable storyline to explain them: that in the two years since Democrats claimed the White House and large majorities in both houses of Congress, they have overreached, moving too far to the left and alienating the public -- especially the moderate and conservative Americans who helped elect Democrats and may now be feeling that they've seen too much change, too fast.<br><br>This is an easy story to tell, but the reality is that Democrats lost not because they went too far but because they haven't gone far enough. A big part of why Democrats lost Tuesday is that they haven't accomplished enough to energize and motivate all of the new voters that came out in massive numbers for them in 2008 -- groups like African Americans, Latinos and young people. While many of these groups still strongly support Democrats when polled, it's clear that they did not vote or volunteer for Democratic campaigns in the same numbers or with the same enthusiasm seen in 2008.<br><br>There is a long list of issues for which Democrats have fallen far short of what they promised to African Americans while campaigning in 2008. Republican obstructionism in Congress has made it hard in some cases for Democrats to get things done. But part of the issue is that Democrats have not fought hard enough in a way that truly distinguishes them from Republicans and gives black people confidence that they care about making a big difference on issues that matter to them.<br><br>In the arena of criminal-justice reform, for example, the Obama White House and Democrats failed to deliver (or even try to deliver) on much of what they promised to do to alleviate the disproportionate imprisonment of people of color.<br><br>When running for president, Barack Obama promised to institute a ban on racial profiling by federal law-enforcement agencies. Congress and the White House have failed to make this legislation a priority and pass it. Candidate Obama promised to encourage videotaping of interrogations in capital cases but has taken no action on that front. Obama promised to start a prison-to-work incentive program to help former inmates restart their lives and avoid ending up back in prison -- but the president hasn't taken action on that front.<br><br>When the time came to reform the &lt;a href="http://www.drugpolicy.org/drugwar/mandatorymin/crackpowder.cfm"&gt;100-to-1 disparity&lt;/a&gt; in sentencing between crack- and powder-cocaine offenses, Congress reduced but didn't eliminate it, leaving a racist disparity in place. Despite having previously voiced support for fully eliminating the disparity, neither Congress nor the White House fought for its full elimination. Instead they caved in to Republicans who wanted to keep a disparity in place, without even challenging them to defend their position (which has no legitimate basis and no arguments to back it up).<br><br>More broadly, on top of all these broken promises, Democrats continue to support failed drug policies that disproportionately target and lock up African Americans and Latinos. The White House and other top Democrats have continued to support marijuana prohibition (and lobbied against efforts to end it). They have also increased funding for federal law-enforcement grants that fuel racial profiling and disproportionate targeting of people of color for drug arrests.<br><br>Democrats also haven't done enough to address the devastating economic impact the recession and foreclosure crisis have had on African Americans.<br><br>Black unemployment is nearly double that of the general population -- at 16.1 percent in September. At the close of the summer, black teen unemployment was more than 45 percent, compared with just 23 percent for white teens. But despite the Obama administration's willingness to directly invest in the banking and auto industries, Americans are still waiting for a comprehensive jobs bill, one that does more than offer tax cuts for private businesses that hire workers. The frustration in black America is palpable.<br><br>The foreclosure crisis has hit black Americans hardest. Black homeownership peaked in 2004. Since then, it has dipped more than four percentage points to 45 percent, which is roughly twice the decline of the national rate. Last year it looked as though President Obama had a solution. He announced the &lt;a href="http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/modification_eligibility.html"&gt;Home Affordable Modification Program&lt;/a&gt; (HAMP) by saying it would "enable as many as 3 to 3 million homeowners to modify the terms of their mortgages to avoid foreclosure." But recent reports show that so far, HAMP has resulted in &lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/19/lawsuits-reflect-widespre_n_768368.html"&gt;just over 445,000 five-year modifications&lt;/a&gt;.<br><br>While the program itself clearly has some inherent problems, the larger issue is that the administration needs to recognize that fixing the foreclosure mess cannot be solely dependent on banks' willingness to participate in the solution. The Democrats need to wield a stick in dealing with the banks, not just the carrot.<br><br>Too often, Democrats have pre-emptively compromised with Republicans and powerful, politically entrenched industries instead of clearly stating their positions and fighting hard for the best-possible solutions. This has not only resulted in watered-down, ineffective solutions to the huge problems our country faces but has also contributed to a sense among many Americans that Democrats aren't ready, or simply don't care to truly fight for them.<br><br>Black Americans support President Obama and want him to succeed. Moving forward, Republicans are likely to pose even more of an obstacle to the changes Democrats promised, and many will argue that the only way forward for Democrats is to move to the right, chart an even tamer course, and compromise further with Republicans and the large corporate interests they represent.<br><br>But listening to the Republicans and Wall Street in the wake of Election Day is not going to bring about the changes we need or help Democrats win in 2012. Fighting harder to deliver on the change promised in 2008 is the only way to make clear to voters that Democrats represent a real alternative to the failed policies of the past. We hope that the Democrats take Tuesday's election results as a signal that now is the time to be bold and lead.<br><br>&lt;i&gt;James Rucker is the executive director of &lt;a href="http://colorofchange.org"&gt;ColorOfChange.org&lt;/a&gt;, an online community of more than 700,000 dedicated to amplifying the political voice of Black America.&lt;/i&gt;</p>]]></content:encoded><description>
In the wake of large Republican gains in this week's election, many in the media are relating a familiar and predictable storyline to explain them: that in the two years since Democrats claimed the White House and large majorities in both houses of Congress, they have overreached, moving too far to the left and alienating the public -- especially the moderate and conservative Americans who helped elect Democrats and may now be feeling that they've seen too much change, too fast.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/11/its-time-to-be-bold-democrats-and-black-america.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Troy Davis: A Death Row Inmate’s Chance to Prove his Innocence</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/YoAz0Iv2AVk/troy-davis-a-death-row-inmates-chance-to-prove-his-innocence.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Crime &amp; Punishment</category><category>Current Affairs</category><category>The Law</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>Ben Jealous</category><category>capital punishment</category><category>death row</category><category>NAACP</category><category>NCADP</category><category>Troy Davis</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:58:48 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef013484cf72a0970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>By Benjamin Todd Jealous</strong></p><p><em>Courtesy of <a href="http://naacpblogs.naacp.org/blog/?p=592#more-592" target="_blank" title="A Death Row Inmate’s Chance to Prove his Innocence">NAACP.org</a></em><br><strong></strong></p><p>On Wednesday the saga of death row inmate <a href="http://troyanthonydavis.org/" target="_blank" title="TroyAnthonyDavis.com">Troy Anthony Davis</a>
will begin its last chapter. In an extremely rare ruling last summer,
the United States Supreme Court ordered a federal judge in Georgia to
grant Troy an evidentiary hearing to prove his innocence.</p>
<p>The ruling is unusual in that the Supreme Court has not granted this
writ of habeas corpus in more than 50 years. Their decision is a strong
indication that they are concerned about the constitutionality of
executing the innocent — as am I.</p>
<p>Although much work still must be done in our justice system to
ensure the innocent do not pay the price of the guilty, the granting of
this evidentiary hearing is a major step for Troy Davis and for many
other likely innocent prisoners sitting on death row; Troy Davis will
have an opportunity to tell his side of the story and new evidence will
be considered in this nearly 20-year-old case.<span id="more-592"></span></p>
<p>The hearing will allow the testimony of witnesses who have recanted
or contradicted their original eyewitness testimonies to be heard and
examined in a court of law. At long last, the courts will hear critical
testimony that they were prevented from hearing in the original trial.</p>
<p>Troy’s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy_Davis_case" target="_blank" title="Wikipedia: Troy A. Davis">journey to death row</a> began in the summer of 1989, when he was
arrested in connection with the killing of an off-duty police officer
outside a Burger King restaurant in Savannah, Georgia. Two years later
he was convicted and sentenced to death for a crime many believe he did
not commit.</p>
<p>I had the privilege of meeting Mr. Davis almost a year ago, and I
was convinced of his innocence. My sense of his innocence is
impressionistic, but a close examination of the case indicates there
was no physical evidence that tied him to the crime, no weapon was ever
recovered and seven of the nine eyewitnesses have recanted or changed
their original testimony in sworn affidavits, citing alleged police
coercion.</p>
<p>One of the witnesses, a teenager, said the police threatened to hold
him as an accessory to murder, warning that he would “go to jail for a
long time” and would be lucky to ever get out because a police officer
had been killed.</p>
<p>Since that trial, several members of the jury have delivered sworn
statements to the court, indicating that their decision was based on
incomplete and unreliable evidence. Given the murky timeline of the
events in the dead of night, eyewitnesses who changed their stories,
the pressure placed on the Savannah police department to promptly
arrest and convict a “cop killer,” and the alleged coercion of
witnesses, it is easy to understand why some jurors have admitted their
uncertainty.</p>
<p>For nearly twenty years, Mr. Davis’s life has hung in the balance.
Despite the prevalence of evidence and thousands of people rallying to
save him from execution, including the NAACP, Amnesty International,
former President Jimmy Carter, actor/activist Danny Glover, former FBI
director William Sessions and conservative Congressman Bob Barr, the
courts stubbornly refused to hear Davis’s claims of innocence…until now.</p>
<p>It is the unjust reality of the death penalty that in our nation
that there are more than 3,300 people withering on our nation’s death
rows, men and women who are almost universally poor, disproportionately
African-American and in some cases innocent. Since 1973, according to
the Death Penalty Information Center, 138 people have been released
from death row with evidence of their innocence. Executing an innocent
person is a mistake that cannot be rectified.</p>
<p>We still have a long way to go before Troy has a chance at life off
death row. The standard of proof in the evidentiary hearing turns our
criminal justice system on its head. Mr. Davis will be expected to
prove his innocence rather than for the state to prove his guilt beyond
a reasonable doubt. This is especially challenging given that the crime
happened more than 20 years ago and there is no physical evidence, such
as DNA.</p>
<p>The Troy Davis case is the most compelling case of innocence in
decades and on June 23, 2010, I will join leaders from NAACP, Amnesty
International and other faith and community organizations in Savannah,
Georgia, lending our support to Troy and his family and offering
prayers for a favorable outcome at the hearing. We continue to work
tirelessly on behalf of Troy and the MacPhail family to bring the real
killer of Officer Mark Allen MacPhail to justice and to bring closure
to both families.</p>
<p>Whatever the outcome of the hearing, we will be in the trenches,
knocking on doors and holding prayer vigils in the churches of Georgia
and across the country until justice prevails for Troy Davis and for
all Americans who have been caught in the painful web of injustice.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>"The Troy Davis case is the most compelling case of innocence in decades and on June 23, 2010, I will join leaders from NAACP, Amnesty International and other faith and community organizations in Savannah, Georgia, lending our support to Troy and his family and offering prayers for a favorable outcome at the hearing. We continue to work tirelessly on behalf of Troy and the MacPhail family to bring the real killer of Officer Mark Allen MacPhail to justice and to bring closure to both families.

Whatever the outcome of the hearing, we will be in the trenches, knocking on doors and holding prayer vigils in the churches of Georgia and across the country until justice prevails for Troy Davis and for all Americans who have been caught in the painful web of injustice."

--Ben Jealous, President, NAACP</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/06/troy-davis-a-death-row-inmates-chance-to-prove-his-innocence.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Not Knocking on Heaven’s Door: Black Atheists, Urban America</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/4tL9nSnq0eM/not-knocking-on-heavens-door-black-atheists-urban-america-1.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Religion</category><category>atheism</category><category>atheist</category><category>Christianity</category><category>Frederick Douglass</category><category>humanism</category><category>James Baldwin</category><category>Langston Hughes</category><category>orthodoxy</category><category>religion</category><category>secular</category><category>Sikivu Hutchinson</category><category>skepticism</category><category>spirituality</category><category>W.E.B. DuBois</category><category>Zora Neale Hurston  </category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:19:45 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef013483fa986a970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Not</em> Knocking on Heaven’s Door:* Black Atheists, Urban America *</strong></p><p><strong>By Sikivu Hutchinson</strong></p><p><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></p>Late Saturday afternoon, like clockwork, the street corner preachers on Crenshaw and King Boulevard in South Los Angeles take to the “stage.” Decked out in flowing robes and dreadlocks, they fulminate into their mikes about the universe, God’s will and “unnatural” homosexuals to a motley audience waiting for the next express bus. Members of the Black Israelites, they are part of a long tradition of performative religiosity in urban African American communities. This particular corner of black America is a hotbed of social commerce. Kids who’ve just gotten out of school mingle jubilantly as pedestrians flow past fast food places, mom and pop retailers, street vendors and Jehovah’s Witness’ hawking Watchtower magazines. The Israelites have become a fixture of this street corner’s otherwise shifting tableaux. Exclusively male and virulently sexist and homophobic, they are tolerated in some African American communities in part because of the lingering visceral and misguided appeal of Black nationalism. <br><p>While the Israelites’ millennialist “racial uplift” ethos ostensibly fits right in to the bustle of this prominent South L.A. street, other belief systems are not as easily assimilated. Since 2006, the L.A.-based street philosopher Jeffrey “P Funk” Mitchell has been documenting his conversations with everyday folk on questions of atheism and faith. Using the handle “Atheist Walking,” Mitchell also conducts free-ranging inquiries into Christianity’s contradictions with a rolling video camera and a satirically raised eyebrow. Adopting the role of the bemused urban flaneur, ala the commentator- pedestrian immortalized by French poet Charles Baudelaire, he delves into “atheist spirituality,” biblical literalism and the paradoxes of faith. </p><p>Mitchell is a member of the L.A.-based <a href="http://blackskeptics.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" title="Black Skeptics Group">Black Skeptics</a>, a group that was formed earlier this year to provide an outlet and platform for secular humanist African Americans. The Skeptics are part of a small but growing segment of African Americans who are searching for humanist alternatives to organized religion. In May, the Washington DC Center for Inquiry’s first annual African Americans for Humanism conference drew over fifty participants. Chat groups and websites like the Black Atheists of America have sprung up to accommodate the longing for community amongst non-theist African Americans who feel marginalized in a sea of black hyper-religiosity. Organizations such as the Institute for Humanist Studies cultivate African American secularist scholarship and advocacy.</p><p>With over 85% of African Americans professing religious belief, black religiosity is a formidable influence. Racial segregation, the historical role of the Black Church, and African American social conformity reinforce Christianity’s powerful hold on black communities. Indeed, I was recently told that I’d been deemed an unsuitable culmination speaker for a bourgie philanthropic organization’s young women mentees because of my decidedly unladylike public atheism (Perhaps the Israelite’s Old Testament shout-out to silent prostrate women would be more acceptable). </p><p>Proper role models for impressionable black youth are, at the very least, skillful church lady pretenders with ornate hats in tow. Secular organizations that seek to build humanist community with a predominantly African American base and social justice world view are challenged by the association of charitable giving, philanthropy, poverty work and education with faith-based communities. For many, successfully emulating the strong social and cultural networks that have sustained church congregations is an elusive goal. </p><p>And then, there is the deep and abiding desire for belief in the supernatural, the ineffable faith-passion that propels some through the trauma of racial indignities and personal crisis. Yet, humanism asks why we should cede enlightenment and the potential for restoration to the supernatural. Humanism challenges the implication that the sublimity of the natural world, and our connection to those that we love, admire and respect, is somehow impoverished without a divine creator. </p><p>In one of his bus stop monologues, Mitchell comments, “I want people to look at each other with the same reverence that they look at God and realize that ‘we’ did this, we made this happen.” The “we” represents will, agency, and motive force; qualities that many believers would attribute to God as omniscient architect and overseer. Non-believers are compelled to ask whether individual actions (for good or ill) are determined by God, or whether human beings simply act on their own volition in a universe overseen by God. Since time immemorial, non-believers have questioned whether God exercises control over those who commit evil acts or whether hell is the only “medium” for justice. By refusing to invest supernatural forces with divine authority over human affairs, humanism emphasizes human responsibility for the outcome of our pursuits. Morality is defined by just deeds, fairness, equality and respect for difference; not by how blusteringly one claims to adhere to “Godly” principles.</p><p>However, in communities that are plagued with double digit unemployment and a sense of cultural devaluation, notions of self-sufficiency and ultimate human agency may be perceived as demoralizing if not dangerously radical. As a child preacher steeped in the fiery oratory of the Black Church, writer James Baldwin recounted his growing cynicism about spreading “the gospel.” Lamenting the grip of religion on poor blacks, Baldwin said, “When I faced a congregation, it began to take all the strength I had not to…tell them to throw away their Bibles and get off their knees and go home and organize.” </p><p>In Baldwin’s view organized religion’s requirement that believers suspend disbelief and submit to “God’s will” is a liability for working class African Americans. Religious dogma anesthetizes as it bonds, a dangerous combination in an era in which the proliferation of storefront churches in urban black communities is a symptom of economic underdevelopment.</p><p>Echoing Baldwin, Chicago-based Education professor and atheist Kamau Rashid argues that “Freethought is an extension and expression of the struggle that African Americans have waged for self-determination. In fact it represents a heightened phase of such a struggle wherein one of the final stages of ‘conceptual incarceration,’ the belief in a God or gods, is discarded for a belief in the human potential, for a belief in ourselves.”</p><p>And why, in a heritage steeped in the revolutionary thought of such dirty outlaw skeptics as Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. DuBois, Baldwin, Zora Neale Hurston, Langston Hughes, Nella Larsen, A. Philip Randolph, James Forman and Alice Walker, would this be so viscerally frightening?</p><br><p><em>Sikivu Hutchinson is the editor of <a href="http://www.BlackFemLens.org" target="_blank" title="BlackFemLens.org">BlackFemLens.org</a>, a member of the Black Skeptics Group and the author of the forthcoming book, <strong>Moral Combat: Black Atheists, Gender Politics and Secular America</strong>.</em></p><br>*With apologies to Bob Dylan]]></content:encoded><description>"[James] In Baldwin’s view organized religion’s requirement that believers suspend disbelief and submit to “God’s will” is a liability for working class African Americans. Religious dogma anesthetizes as it bonds, a dangerous combination in an era in which the proliferation of storefront churches in urban black communities is a symptom of economic underdevelopment.

Echoing Baldwin, Chicago-based Education professor and atheist Kamau Rashid argues that “Freethought is an extension and expression of the struggle that African Americans have waged for self-determination. In fact it represents a heightened phase of such a struggle wherein one of the final stages of ‘conceptual incarceration,’ the belief in a God or gods, is discarded for a belief in the human potential, for a belief in ourselves.”

And why, in a heritage steeped in the revolutionary thought of such dirty outlaw skeptics as Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. DuBois, Baldwin, Zora Neale Hurston, Langston Hughes, Nella Larsen, A. Philip Randolph, James Forman and Alice Walker, would this be so viscerally frightening?"

--Sikivu Hutchinson</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/06/not-knocking-on-heavens-door-black-atheists-urban-america-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Color We See But Don't Speak: How Race Impacts Our Kids</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/3rL40NYEfXA/the-color-we-see-but-dont-speak-how-race-impacts-our-kids.html</link><category>Anderson Cooper</category><category>bias</category><category>children</category><category>CNN</category><category>complexion</category><category>discrimination</category><category>Imani Perry</category><category>Margaret Beale Spencer</category><category>race</category><category>race relations</category><category>racism</category><category>self-image</category><category>skin color</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 17:55:00 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0133ee424156970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>By Imani Perry</strong></p><p><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></p><p><em>Republished courtesy of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/imani-perry/the-color-we-see-but-dont_b_580515.html" target="_blank" title=" Your request is being processed...           Imani Perry Imani Perry Professor in the Center for African American Studies, Princeton University Posted: May 18, 2010 02:38 PM BIO Become a Fan Get Email Alerts Bloggers' Index           The Color We See But Don't Speak: How Race Impacts Our Kids">The Huffington Post</a></em></p><p>This week Anderson Cooper 360 is airing a <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/05/13/doll.study/index.html" target="_hplink">four-part series on a CNN</a>
commissioned study that examines how children view skin color. The
results of the study, led by University of Chicago professor <a href="http://humdev.uchicago.edu/people/faculty/spencer.shtml" target="_blank" title="About Prof. Spencer">Margaret
Beale Spencer</a>, show that white children show a high bias towards white
skin, and black children show a less, but still significant bias toward
white skin as well. The children who were subjects of the research were
in two age groups, 4-5 and 9-10.</p>

<p>I must say that the study, while heartbreaking, is not surprising. I
am the mother of two African American boys, ages 4 and 6. In our
household we talk about race frequently, we celebrate African American
literature, music, and art. We teach appreciation for our culture and
other cultures. We immerse them in the beauty of our ethnic tradition.
However, even with all of this deliberate effort, it is a serious
uphill battle to work against the image of race they are exposed to on
a daily basis.</p>

<p>My elder son repeatedly comments on the marginality or complete
absence of Black characters in virtually all children's television
programming except what he, of his own accord, calls "black shows." He
already knows that he is designated as the sidekick in this society. So
do his classmates.</p>

<p>But more than that, he knows that for Black characters, lighter skin
is valued, particularly on programming for tweens. It is even more
dramatic for girls. I cannot recall the last time I saw a brown or dark
skinned black girl on a mainstream children's television show besides
that lone wolf of racial inclusion Sesame Street. Even when the parents
are dark skinned, the girls are significantly lighter. The same issue
exists in advertising in children's magazines and catalogs.</p>

<p>When <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=Harry+Reid%27s+comment+&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a" target="_blank" title="Google search: &quot;Harry Reid's comment&quot;">Harry Reid's comment</a> about Obama's light skin and absence of
"Negro dialect" hit the media, my first thought was of children and how
they probably also knew that Obama's lighter skin made a difference to
many of the adults around them. After all, it clearly matters when it
comes to the celebrities we teach them to admire, and even for the
cartoon characters we entertain them with.</p>

<p>What happens on television and in print media gets repeated out in
the world. I recently took my boys to the beauty supply store one day
because I needed to buy some barrettes. They marveled at the rows and
rows of long flowing wigs and weaves in this store catering to Black
women. In that moment they learned that for many Black women hair that
looks and feels like something completely different from what grows out
of their heads is vastly preferred. And they were being taught
something about what the world considers beautiful. How much will it
matter, I wondered, that I model a celebration of our hair and skin,
with a world speaking against me?</p>

<p>There are times when, at the bookstore, we have opened children's
books dedicated to some hero in African American history, and found the
troubling phrase "a good slave master" as in "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Box_Brown" target="_blank" title="Wikipedia: Henry &quot;Box&quot; Brown">Henry Box Brown</a> had a
good master" as though there wasn't a fundamental evil to holding
people in life long inherited bondage. What does it mean to a Black
child when we soft pedal the most inhumane feature of the Black
experience in the United States?</p>

<p>My children are often witnesses when we (parents, grandparents,
other adult caretakers) experience racist micro-aggressions: the change
that is dropped on the counter instead of returned to the hand, the
failure of retail sales people to make eye contact, the clutched
purses, the rude responses, the greetings that we offer that are not
returned, the clerks who follow us in stores. They see the adults who
love and care for them, who diligently teach them to be kind and
respectful and hard working, treated unfairly on the basis of race.
This experience is normal for children of color in the United States.</p>

<p>All of our children see race. They see the differences in the way we
are depicted and treated. They see the gaps in our socioeconomic
conditions that are so highly influenced by race. When we don't talk to
them about race and inequality, the only way they have to make sense of
it all is to assume that there is a greater human value for those who
by accident of birth are white.</p>

<p>I am a professor in the <a href="http://www.princeton.edu/africanamericanstudies/people/faculty/imani-perry/" target="_blank" title="About Prof. Perry">Center for African American Studies</a> at
Princeton University. By the time I get to talk to young people about
race they are on the brink of adulthood. They are formed in many ways.
But each day in the classroom with them yields so much. My students are
bubbling over with the desire to learn, understand and make sense of
race: this taboo subject that has been around then every single day. I
immerse them in a great deal of scholarly research and analysis of
race, to allow them to develop deep understandings of how it has
operated and how it continues to matter. I am appreciative that these
conversations are a central part of my life's work. However, I hope
that this CNN series will encourage parents, schools and community
organizations to begin these conversations with young people sooner, to
demand better from our media and our communities, and to continue to
educate ourselves along with our children, about race. </p><p></p><p><em><a href="http://www.princeton.edu/africanamericanstudies/people/faculty/imani-perry/" target="_blank" title="About Prof. Perry">Imani Perry, PhD, JD</a>
is a professor at Princeton University and regular contributor to
Afro-Netizen. She is an interdisciplinary scholar who studies race and
African American culture using the tools provided by various
disciplines including: law, literary and cultural studies, music, and
the social sciences.</em></p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This week Anderson Cooper 360 is airing a four-part series on a CNN commissioned study that examines how children view skin color. The results of the study, led by University of Chicago professor Margaret Beale Spencer, show that white children show a high bias towards white skin, and black children show a less, but still significant bias toward white skin as well. The children who were subjects of the research were in two age groups, 4-5 and 9-10.

I must say that the study, while heartbreaking, is not surprising. I am the mother of two African American boys, ages 4 and 6. In our household we talk about race frequently, we celebrate African American literature, music, and art. We teach appreciation for our culture and other cultures. We immerse them in the beauty of our ethnic tradition. However, even with all of this deliberate effort, it is a serious uphill battle to work against the image of race they are exposed to on a daily basis.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/05/the-color-we-see-but-dont-speak-how-race-impacts-our-kids.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Obama-Era Education Policy: The Evidence of Things Not Seen</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/hJzsaxtBy54/obamaera-education-policy-the-evidence-of-things-not-seen.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Education</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>Arne Duncan</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>charter schools</category><category>Education</category><category>public policy</category><category>public schools</category><category>Ronald Chennault</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 17:34:00 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0133ee4071d9970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>By Ronald E. Chennault</strong></p><p><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></p><p><strong><em>Originally published by <a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/05/19/32chennault_ep.h29.html?tkn=ZLMFq4Qf%2BS56WgHE1NcxBneP3EqfK2F7jFkG&amp;intc=es" target="_blank" title="Obama-Era Education Policy: The Evidence of Things Not Seen">Education Week</a></em><br></strong></p><div class="usertoolbox-top"><p>One of the
education innovations President Barack Obama seems to be enamored of is
the extension of the school day or school year (or both). Whether he
means providing more after-school programs, creating more learning
opportunities during the traditional summer break, or literally adding
hours to the school day and days to the academic year is not clear,
though he appears to be in support of all of the above.</p></div>

			
			<p>But
what the president actually means matters, because requiring students
to spend more time in school—even more than was envisioned over 25
years ago when <em>A Nation at Risk</em> promoted the idea—is a policy
we in fact know very little about. And what we do know suggests that
adding more time is not worth the effort.</p>
			<p>Among Mr. Obama’s
promises to the nation was that, under his administration, science
would be brought back into the White House, and the primacy of
decisionmaking supported by evidence would return to government. When
it comes to education policy, though, my reading of what has emerged
during his first year in office suggests that he didn’t really mean
what he said.</p>
<div class="right">
	<div class="pullquote">
			<div class="quote">"Large-scale
experimentation requires caution and needs to be informed by theory and
practice, not just promoted by strong rhetoric."</div>
			
			
	</div>
</div>			<p>For starters, he selected a former chief executive officer
of the Chicago public schools, Arne Duncan, to lead the way. This was a
disappointing though not surprising choice, given that the president’s
relationship with Duncan predated the election, and was based in part
on bonding around a favored American sport. Duncan’s experience as the
head of the country’s third-largest school district was surely a major
factor as well. In that capacity, he oversaw for seven years one of the
most dynamic, intricate, and challenging districts in the nation.</p>
			<p>What
disappoints, however, is that Duncan doesn’t seem to have developed
much wisdom from that experience. There is no indication of a broad or
deep understanding, or at least an appreciation, of the complicated
relationship between education and larger societal forces. Nor was his
tenure as Chicago’s schools chief an unmitigated success in any of the
popular ways politicians and presidents define success, such as
increased test scores and lower dropout rates.</p>
			<p>Duncan’s debut
on the national stage has been quite remarkable. Since the creation of
the position in the Carter administration, the U.S. secretary of
education has primarily been a “quiet” player. The one notable
exception was William J. Bennett, during the Reagan administration.
Given the nature of Duncan’s service as CEO of the Chicago schools
under Mayor Richard M. Daley, it seemed likely that he would fit quite
well into the “quiet player” pattern. Quite the opposite has happened,
however: Secretary Duncan has been one of the most visible and vocal
Cabinet members thus far. He has offered a series of bold declarations
about the state of schooling, and aimed a barrage of highly critical
barbs at educators and schools of education.</p>
			<p>Education in
America, particularly what takes place in many urban and rural schools,
cries out for our most creative thinking and sustained attention. And
having a prominent, empowered figure leading the way could help us
accomplish some of the reforms that educators themselves have long
supported but felt hamstrung in their efforts to put in place. Sadly,
instead of “racing to the top,” reform in the first year of the Obama
administration has been hastening down a much too narrow-minded and
unsupported path. Which brings us back to the question: What of this
reclaimed era of evidence-based decisionmaking?</p>
			<p>For some of
Duncan’s biggest ideas so far—more mayoral takeovers of local school
districts, more performance-based-pay programs for teachers, longer
school days or school years, increased routes to teacher certification,
larger numbers of charter schools—there are at best limited or
inconclusive findings regarding their success. And at worst, there are
serious causes for concern or bodies of evidence that on balance point <em>away</em>
from their success, not toward it. Lack of certainty does not need to
be an impediment to action. But large-scale experimentation requires
caution and needs to be informed by theory and practice, not just
promoted by strong rhetoric.</p>
			<p>The case of alternative certification illustrates this point. Secretary Duncan has on many occasions, such as in a <a href="http://www2.ed.gov/news/speeches/2009/10/10092009.html">major speech</a>
last fall at the University of Virginia, extolled the benefits of what
he calls “high-quality alternative pathways” to teacher certification
(such as Teach For America). In that same speech, he criticized
traditional teacher education programs and called for them to be, among
other things, “more rigorous and clinical.” Yet Duncan wants to have it
both ways: to lambaste schools of education for not offering enough
preparation to future teachers, while praising
alternative-certification programs that inherently accelerate the
process and offer <em>less</em> clinical preparation.</p>
			<p>Instead
of an evidence-based approach, what this sounds like is an
administration that emphasizes the evidence that supports its
educational agenda and downplays or ignores that which doesn’t. The
unfortunate result is that, after one year, President Obama’s education
agenda is, broadly speaking, indistinguishable from that of his
predecessor. Sure, Mr. Obama, unlike George W. Bush, has not expressed
support for federally funded voucher programs, for example. And it is
nearly impossible to imagine that President Bush would have thought
seriously about schools’ needs in his allocation of billions of
stimulus dollars. But for anyone who might have expected the current
president to move in a new direction in education, there is not much
about which to be hopeful.</p>
<div class="right">
	<div class="pullquote">
			<div class="quote">"Sadly,
instead of 'racing to the top,' reform in the first year of the Obama
administration has been hastening down a much too narrow-minded and
unsupported path."</div>
			
			
	</div>
</div>			<p>President Obama <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-of-the-President-to-the-United-States-Hispanic-Chamber-of-Commerce/">has claimed</a>
that Arne Duncan “will use only one test when deciding what ideas to
support with [our] precious tax dollars: It’s not whether an idea is
liberal or conservative, but whether it works.” But what works for
whom? In what context(s)? According to what indicator? More to the
point, with regard to many of the ideas that Secretary Duncan has
promulgated so far, we don’t even know yet what works. So, by his own
standards, the president is being less than honest.</p>
			<p>The truth
of the matter is that President Obama has a particular vision of the
role that public schools should play in our society, and his secretary
of education’s job is to promote that vision. But education is a
value-laden enterprise—inescapably so—and while evidence should be
driving our educational decisionmaking, the field is too complex to
have these matters decided by research alone.</p>
			<p>The reform of
education in American has to be connected to a vision of what kind of
society we want to have and how education can help us get there. So
far, President Obama’s corporate-minded approach has led him (and
Secretary Duncan) to speak of the role of education in very narrow
terms. Judging from their comments, they see schools as existing
primarily to develop in young people the skills they need to compete
for jobs in a global economy. Such rhetoric is relevant at the moment,
given the unemployment numbers the nation is facing, but ultimately we
deserve—actually, we need—to have a president with a more expansive and
hope-filled view of the functions of education than that.</p>
			<p>If
the administration were more truthful about its education agenda—that
is, by admitting that it’s not about what works but what those in
charge <em>want</em> to work—then we could discard this pretense of evidence-based decisionmaking and get to the real battle at hand.</p><p></p><p><em><a href="http://education.depaul.edu/About/FacultyStaffDirect/FacultyPages/ronald_chennault.asp" target="_blank" title="About Prof. Chennault">Ronald E. Chennault</a> is an associate dean of education and an associate
professor of educational policy studies and research at DePaul
University, in Chicago.</em></p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>One of the education innovations President Barack Obama seems to be enamored of is the extension of the school day or school year (or both). Whether he means providing more after-school programs, creating more learning opportunities during the traditional summer break, or literally adding hours to the school day and days to the academic year is not clear, though he appears to be in support of all of the above.

But what the president actually means matters, because requiring students to spend more time in school—even more than was envisioned over 25 years ago when A Nation at Risk promoted the idea—is a policy we in fact know very little about. And what we do know suggests that adding more time is not worth the effort.

Among Mr. Obama’s promises to the nation was that, under his administration, science would be brought back into the White House, and the primacy of decisionmaking supported by evidence would return to government. When it comes to education policy, though, my reading of what has emerged during his first year in office suggests that he didn’t really mean what he said.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/05/obamaera-education-policy-the-evidence-of-things-not-seen.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Easter Season, Capital Punishment, and the “Drum Major for Peace”</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/Pqgml48j4VQ/easter-season-capital-punishment-and-the-drum-major-for-peace.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Crime &amp; Punishment</category><category>Death/In Memoriam</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Religion</category><category>The Law</category><category>African Americans</category><category>capital punishment</category><category>death penalty</category><category>death row</category><category>electric chair</category><category>executions</category><category>Gandhi</category><category>incarceration</category><category>innocence project</category><category>Lorraine Motel</category><category>Martin Luther King</category><category>MLK</category><category>Murder Victims’ Families for Human Rights</category><category>Murder Victims’ Families for Reconciliation</category><category>NCADP</category><category>prison industrial complex</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:42:07 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef01347fa88b00970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<strong>By Margaret Summers</strong><p><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></p><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0133ec7ad42b970b-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="Mlk2" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0133ec7ad42b970b " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0133ec7ad42b970b-320wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px; width: 192px; height: 296px;"></img></a> During Easter season, Christians worldwide celebrate the resurrection of Jesus Christ.  It occurs in the early spring, a season rife with anticipation and the promise of new beginnings; of the shoots of green plants pushing their way through soil warmed by the sun, thawed after a long and frozen winter; of new leaves opening on trees and bushes; of blossoming flowers upturned to the rays of a welcoming sun. <br><p>This year, in a tragic historic coincidence, Easter Sunday fell on the 42nd anniversary of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Martin_Luther_King,_Jr." target="_blank" title="Wikipedia: Assassination of MLK">the killing of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.</a>, civil and human rights champion, a self-described “drum major for peace.”   Dr. King was shot dead on April 4, 1968 in Memphis, Tennessee as he stood on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel with friends and fellow activists. They were in Memphis to support economic justice for striking sanitation workers, a majority of whom were African American.</p>Uprisings exploded in several urban U.S. cities in reaction to the murder – expressions of uncontrollable grief, rage, and hopelessness, now that the man who had led millions up figurative mountaintops where all could share in his vision of a promised land where races could live together in equality, respect and love, was so violently and brutally taken from them. <br><br>Undoubtedly such anger and anguish back then prompted many to call for the execution of whoever was responsible for killing Dr. King. But neither Dr. King nor his immediate family had ever supported capital punishment. For Dr. King, a follower of the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi, whose massive nonviolent demonstrations brought down British colonial rule in India – a tactic that Dr. King later used with great success in the sit-ins, pray-ins, and other anti-segregation protests in the Deep South – it was impossible to simultaneously believe in nonviolence as a way of life and also believe in the death penalty. <br><p>Dr. King felt the punishment effectively writes off human beings as forever irredeemable and unforgivable. “Make your way to death row and speak with the tragic victims of criminality,” he said. “As they prepare to make their pathetic walk to the electric chair, their hopeless cry is that society will not forgive. Capital punishment is society's final assertion that it will not forgive.”</p><p>“I do not think God approves the death penalty for any crime - rape and murder included,” Dr. King asserted. “Capital punishment is against the best judgment of modern criminology and, above all, against the highest expression of love in the nature of God.”</p>Dr. King’s family, suddenly left without a husband and father 42 years ago, nevertheless agreed with his views that the death penalty perpetuates violence. <br><br> “As one whose husband and mother-in-law have died the victims of murder assassination, I stand firmly and unequivocally opposed to the death penalty for those convicted of capital offenses,” his widow, Coretta Scott King, once said. “An evil deed is not redeemed by an evil deed of retaliation. Justice is never advanced in the taking of a human life. Morality is never upheld by a legalized murder.”<br><br>Such sentiments have been echoed by two of his children. “Having lost my father and grandmother to gun violence, I will understand the deep hurt and anger felt by the loved ones of those who have been murdered,” Reverend Bernice King, recently named President of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, which was once led by her father, had stated. “Yet I can't accept the judgment that their killers deserve to be executed. This merely perpetuates the tragic, unending cycle of violence that destroys our hope for a decent society.”  His son, Martin Luther King, III, who was named for his father and grandfather, was quoted as saying, “I should be on the front line for those advocating the death penalty, [but] we have always been consistently against the death penalty.”   <br><p>The King family’s beliefs are not unusual. They are shared by many murder victims’ families. Among the members of the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty’s Board of Directors, three individuals – New Hampshire State Rep. Robert “Renny” Cushing, Bill Pelke and Bud Welch – lost family members to murder. Rep. Cushing’s father was killed by gunfire through the family home’s screen door. Pelke’s grandmother was killed in the course of a robbery of her home by four teenaged girls.  Welch’s daughter was killed in the Oklahoma City federal building bombing. </p><p> The three are active in organizations working to rid the United States and the world of capital punishment – <a href="http://www.mvfr.org/" target="_blank" title="MVRF">Murder Victims’ Families for Reconciliation</a>, <a href="http://www.mvfhr.org/" target="_blank" title="MVFHR">Murder Victims’ Families for Human Rights</a>, and <a href="http://www.journeyofhope.org" target="_blank" title="Journey of Hope . . . from Violence to Healing">Journey of Hope . . . from Violence to Healing</a>. Victims’ families and the death penalty abolition movement have long worked together to let the public know that the death penalty does not help, but harms such families. The expensive punishment drains needed resources from grief counseling, victims’ families’ compensation, and other services and programs that enable these families to heal. Together, the voices of abolitionists and such murder victims’ families’ organizations and victims’ family members are amplified, united, as they say, “Please – don’t kill in our names.” </p>It is my hope that this Easter season, as many of us celebrate the resurrection of He who also stood for nonviolence and peace, we remember the words of Dr. King and his family members who rejected a punishment system that in the end dehumanizes us all. “The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy,” Dr. King said. “... In fact, violence merely increases hate. ... Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars.”<br><br><em>Margaret Summers is the <a href="http://www.ncadp.org/index.cfm?content=5" target="_blank" title="NCADP Facts &amp; Figures">National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty</a>’s Director of Communications. <br></em>]]></content:encoded><description>This year, in a tragic historic coincidence, Easter Sunday fell on the 42nd anniversary of the killing of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., civil and human rights champion, a self-described “drum major for peace.”   Dr. King was shot dead on April 4, 1968 in Memphis, Tennessee as he stood on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel with friends and fellow activists. They were in Memphis to support economic justice for striking sanitation workers, a majority of whom were African American.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/04/easter-season-capital-punishment-and-the-drum-major-for-peace.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>VIDEO: Parody of popular, pro-Obama "Yes, we can" web video features angry minority leader John Boehner (R-OH), goes viral</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/kXs1dOCqeCM/video-parody-of-popular-proobama-yes-we-can-web-video-features-angry-minority-leader-john-boehner-ro.html</link><category>Arts &amp; Entertainment</category><category>Humor/Satire</category><category>Politics</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Television</category><category>The Arts</category><category>Web/Tech</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Black Eyed Peas</category><category>campaigns</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>gridlock</category><category>health care reform</category><category>John Boehner</category><category>minority leader</category><category>music videos</category><category>No you can't</category><category>politics</category><category>Republicans</category><category>Will.I.am</category><category>Yes we can</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:30:00 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0133ec3a7ab1970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RpOUctySD68&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RpOUctySD68&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>A hilarious parody of the wildly popular, pro-candidate Obama "Yes, we can" web video, featuring the insane GOP minority leader John Boehner (R-OH) interspersed throughout yelling, "Hell no you can't!" An instant classic!</description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/3Z-u8zJ7kYU/RpOUctySD68&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" fileSize="1033" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>A hilarious parody of the wildly popular, pro-candidate Obama "Yes, we can" web video, featuring the insane GOP minority leader John Boehner (R-OH) interspersed throughout yelling, "Hell no you can't!" An instant classic!</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>A hilarious parody of the wildly popular, pro-candidate Obama "Yes, we can" web video, featuring the insane GOP minority leader John Boehner (R-OH) interspersed throughout yelling, "Hell no you can't!" An instant classic!</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/03/video-parody-of-popular-proobama-yes-we-can-web-video-features-angry-minority-leader-john-boehner-ro.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/3Z-u8zJ7kYU/RpOUctySD68&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" length="1033" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.youtube.com/v/RpOUctySD68&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>Who Will Defend the Rights of People of Color to an Open Internet? We Speak for Ourselves</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/LMZfrvOC6vc/who-will-defend-the-rights-of-people-of-color-to-an-open-internet-we-speak-for-ourselves.html</link><category>astroturf</category><category>AT&amp;T</category><category>big telecom</category><category>Center for Media Justice</category><category>Comcast</category><category>communities of color</category><category>digital divide</category><category>digital redlining</category><category>Free Press</category><category>Garlin Gilchrist II</category><category>internet freedom</category><category>Joe Torres</category><category>Malkia Cyril</category><category>minorities</category><category>MMTC</category><category>national broadband plan</category><category>net neutrality</category><category>netroots</category><category>open internet</category><category>people of color</category><category>SaveTheInternet.com</category><category>Verizon</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:28:48 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef01310fe0ac0c970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>By <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/malkia-a-cyril" target="_blank" title="HF bio for Malkia Cyril">Malkia A. Cyril</a></strong><p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Republished courtesy of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/malkia-a-cyril/who-will-defend-the-right_b_512663.html" target="_blank" title="Who Will Defend the Rights of People of Color to an Open Internet? We Speak for Ourselves">The Huffington Post</a></strong></p><p>In every competition, there's a winner and a loser.</p>The open Internet protections being debated by the Federal Communications Commission right now will determine who wins and who loses in the fight over whether big companies or regular people will control the Internet. I want everyday people to win.<br><p>In the fight over who will control the Internet, big companies like Verizon, AT&amp;T, and Comcast are hoping they will win a pass on FCC oversight and public interest protection leaving them free to make as much profit as they can even if the service they provide is gated and discriminatory. Some civil rights groups are legitimately concerned that protecting the public from discrimination online -especially the poor and people of color- from the proven abuses of Big Media companies will result in those companies refusing to build out high speed broadband to rural communities and poor urban communities. </p><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 16px;"><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 16px;"><strong>Threatening to withhold build-out of this critical national utility in
poor communities if there are consumer protections attached is called
digital redlining, and it's wrong.</strong></span></span></div><p>Media companies have said as much, claiming that public interest and consumer protections that ensure that the Internet remains an open and true source of innovation, otherwise known as "net neutrality", will cost too much and deprive them of revenue for deployment of broadband to the communities that need it most. Threatening to withhold build-out of this critical national utility in poor communities if there are consumer protections attached is called digital redlining, and it's wrong.</p>It makes sense that the threat of digital redlining has some civil rights groups in the DC beltway concerned. This concern has resulted in some groups like the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council (MMTC), run by David Honig, taking a position against the open Internet protections that would ensure that the Internet remains an un-gated platform for self-representation, innovation, and opportunity.<br><br>What doesn't make sense is that groups like MMTC would deny that the financial relationship between them and the same media companies that are blackmailing the communities MMTC claims to represent, has an impact on their position on open Internet protections. I agree with <a href="http://www.garlin.org/about-garlin-gilchrist-ii.html" target="_blank" title="About Garlin">Garlin Gilchrist II</a> of the <a href="http://www.communitychange.org/who-we-are/who-we-are" target="_blank" title="About CCC">Center for Community Change</a> that the undue pressure of big media on some civil rights groups like MMTC to advocate against strong open Internet protections has pushed those organizations dangerously close to unwittingly and unwillingly becoming astroturf groups.<br><br>Wikkipedia defines astro-turf as "an English-language term referring to political, advertising, or public relations campaigns that are formally planned by an organization, but designed to mask its origins to create the impression of being spontaneous, popular "grassroots" behavior. The term refers to AstroTurf, a brand of synthetic carpeting designed to look like natural grass. The goal of such a campaign is to disguise the efforts of a political or commercial entity as an independent public reaction to some political entity--a politician, political group, product, service or event. Astroturfers attempt to orchestrate the actions of apparently diverse and geographically distributed individuals, by both overt ("outreach", "awareness", etc.) and covert (disinformation) means. Astroturfing may be undertaken by an individual pushing a personal agenda or highly organized professional groups with financial backing from large corporations..."<br><br>The Internet is the most creative and expansive communications infrastructure of our time. When Joe Torres, my friend and colleague at <a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com" target="_blank" title="Save the Internet">Free Press</a>, <a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/10/03/23/net-neutrality-wishing-we-were-all-same-team" target="_blank" title="Net Neutrality: Wishing We Were All on the Same Team ">hesitated to call MMTC an Astroturf organizatio</a>n, he was right. But MMTC's support for a corporate line around open Internet protections comes dangerously close to astroturfing. While many legacy civil rights groups have clarified that they are not opposed to net neutrality, MMTC continues to take a position against keeping the Internet open. Since there is no evidence that these rules will do anything but protect communities of color and the poor- I don't understand why a group claiming to represent the interests of people of color like me would focus on us only as consumers of a commercial broadband and not as communities who deserve all the richness an open Internet has to offer.<br><p>Openness protections are the Internet's bill of rights. There are no such protections for broadcast or cable and these mediums have become a gated community full of devastating misrepresentation. Openness protections level the playing field on the Internet and ensure that those communities who create and rely on small businesses can use the Internet as a platform for economic mobility and real opportunity. Outside of DC, the civil rights community understands this. The organizations of the <a href="http://www.mediagrassroots.org/" target="_blank" title="About MAG-Net">Media Action Grassroots Network </a>have met repeatedly with the Federal Communications Commission to share stories from our communities about why a non-discriminatory Internet is a civil right in need of protection. </p><p>We told Commissioner Mignon Clyburn about the millions of migrant families who use free sites like Skype -which are threatened by removing open Internet protections- to remain connected with their families abroad. We talked with Commissioner Clyburn and our congressional representatives about how the openness we enjoy now on the Internet enables the constituencies we represent to reach a larger audience. This ability to speak in our own voices and control our user experience on the Internet is as important to communities of color and the poor as broadband deployment and adoption, and is one of the most important communications fights of our lifetime.</p>Commissioner Clyburn has become a champion of Internet openness and has called upon the DC civil rights community to do the same, and some legacy civil rights groups have done so. Unfortunately, MMTC keeps ringing the false alarm that these openness protections will harm our communities. Honig claims to represent the interests of communities of color, and has taken a strong and positive stance on broadband deployment- but in the case of protecting the interests of communities of color online- its time for MMTC to stand with communities of color and the poor, and not with big media.<br><br>Over 300 groups outside of the DC beltway support the strongest open Internet protections possible, and have signed a pledge to that effect. These out-of-the beltway civil rights groups have no financial relationship with media companies, and nothing to gain by the position they've taken. Yet the trade newspapers and mainstream media continue to turn to the beltway for the "civil rights perspective" on the Internet. It's time for the official story on the open Internet and civil rights to come from the mouths of those most impacted by it.<br><br>As a national civil rights community, we know the FCC must fulfill its mandate to represent the interests of people of color and the poor online. We know that broadband adoption is only act one in the story about Internet access. Act two demands 21st Century democracy- and in this information age that democracy will be navigated online. The un-gated access to education, health care, jobs, and democratic engagement that net neutrality rules provide must be defended, and the civil rights of the poor, migrant communities, and communities of color must be protected online. If MMTC won't stand for the millions of people of color and poor people outside of the DC beltway, who will? Perhaps its simply time for us to speak for ourselves, and demand the strongest open Internet protections possible.<br><br>Who speaks for communities of color and the poor about open Internet protections? We speak for ourselves.<br><br><em>Malkia A. Cyril is the executive director of the <a href="http://centerformediajustice.org/home/about/" target="_blank" title="About CMJ">Center for Media Justice</a>, based in Oakland, CA.<br></em>
<br><em>Follow Malkia A. Cyril on Twitter <a href="http://www.twitter.com/movementrising" target="_blank" title="@movementrising">here</a>.</em></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Over 300 groups outside of the DC beltway support the strongest open Internet protections possible, and have signed a pledge to that effect. These out-of-the beltway civil rights groups have no financial relationship with media companies, and nothing to gain by the position they've taken. Yet the trade newspapers and mainstream media continue to turn to the beltway for the "civil rights perspective" on the Internet. It's time for the official story on the open Internet and civil rights to come from the mouths of those most impacted by it.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/03/who-will-defend-the-rights-of-people-of-color-to-an-open-internet-we-speak-for-ourselves.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>VIDEO: Web-based video follow-up to ColorLines show on green equity + grassroots + good government</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/EGTfnzP4TpU/video-webbased-video-followup-to-colorlines-show-on-green-equity-grassroots-good-government.html</link><category>Business &amp; Entrepreneurship</category><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>Economy/Finance</category><category>Health</category><category>Labor/Employment</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>African Americans</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>Applied Research Center</category><category>ARC</category><category>Blacks</category><category>Chris Rabb</category><category>ColorLines</category><category>community benefit agreement</category><category>community organizing</category><category>grassroots</category><category>green economy</category><category>green equity</category><category>green jobs</category><category>Latinos</category><category>navajo</category><category>Racewire</category><category>SCOPE</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:55:17 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0133ec3a5ad0970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<object height="340" width="560"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oh1ykVJ9h8c&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oh1ykVJ9h8c&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded><description>We have to stay fired up to push our government to do its job... namely, putting millions of people into good jobs and answering the urgent needs of our communities. Chris Rabb and ColorLines profile three of the Applied Research Center's Green Equity Case Studies in New York City, Los Angeles and the Navajo Nation. These successful campaigns improve local communities while helping the planet. Shown together, they point towards a winning formula for jobs creation: green equity + grassroots + good government.

The Green Equity Toolkit provides successful practical ways for community, labor, and civic organizations and activists to win equity and inclusion in the green economy. Visit http://arc.org/greenjobs to learn more about the just-released Green Case Studies.

http://scopela.org
http://prattcenter.net/commute
http://blackmesawatercoalition.org</description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/9v7Rxmn91aI/oh1ykVJ9h8c&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" fileSize="1045" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>We have to stay fired up to push our government to do its job... namely, putting millions of people into good jobs and answering the urgent needs of our communities. Chris Rabb and ColorLines profile three of the Applied Research Center's Green Equity Cas</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>We have to stay fired up to push our government to do its job... namely, putting millions of people into good jobs and answering the urgent needs of our communities. Chris Rabb and ColorLines profile three of the Applied Research Center's Green Equity Case Studies in New York City, Los Angeles and the Navajo Nation. These successful campaigns improve local communities while helping the planet. Shown together, they point towards a winning formula for jobs creation: green equity + grassroots + good government. The Green Equity Toolkit provides successful practical ways for community, labor, and civic organizations and activists to win equity and inclusion in the green economy. Visit http://arc.org/greenjobs to learn more about the just-released Green Case Studies. http://scopela.org http://prattcenter.net/commute http://blackmesawatercoalition.org</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/03/video-webbased-video-followup-to-colorlines-show-on-green-equity-grassroots-good-government.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/9v7Rxmn91aI/oh1ykVJ9h8c&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" length="1045" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.youtube.com/v/oh1ykVJ9h8c&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>An Icon Fades: Ebony shaped the black middle class, then misread its digital moment</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/Zg4JJdxKSJM/an-icon-fades-ebony-shaped-the-black-middle-class-then-misread-its-digital-moment.html</link><category>Business &amp; Entrepreneurship</category><category>Media Reform</category><category>Media/Technology</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>Black media</category><category>Black newspapers</category><category>bloggers</category><category>blogging</category><category>Chris Rabb</category><category>digital literacy</category><category>Ebony</category><category>fourth estate</category><category>Johnson Publishing</category><category>journalism</category><category>netroots</category><category>new media</category><category>social media</category><category>The Jet</category><category>web 2.0</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:56:00 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0133ec3a65c6970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 14px;">March/April 2010</span></span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br></span></span></span></strong></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 14px;">By <a href="mailto:cjr@columbia.edu">Don Terry</a></span></span></span></strong></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"></span></span></span></strong></span></span></span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"></span></span></span></strong></span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><a href="http://www.cjr.org/feature/an_icon_fades_1.php?page=all" target="_blank" title="Columbia Journalism Review">Columbia Journalism Review</a></span></span></span></strong></span></span></p><div class="article-body">

                    


                    				
						
							<p><em><span class="dropcap">E</span></em><em>bony</em>
magazine, the African-American monthly, has been a beloved institution
in black America for more than sixty years. These days the love is
still there, but the luster has faded. One of the few
African-American-owned magazines in the country, <em>Ebony</em> is like a once-beautiful, stylish elderly relative, desperately searching for the fountain of youth. Born November 1, 1945, <em>Ebony</em>
showed off her glamour and vitality for decades. But she is tired now,
debt-ridden and seriously ill, her once crystalline voice a raspy
whisper. The black celebrities who once courted her now have other
media suitors, thanks in no small part to the trail <em>Ebony</em> blazed. Too many readers and advertisers have followed them.</p>

<p>Some say her condition is critical and that she could soon die
without an infusion of new ideas and the cash to back them up. Others
say—sadly, always sadly—that it is too late. Those who love her should
say their farewells.</p>

<p>Nonsense, says the Reverend Jesse L. Jackson. He can never say
goodbye. “It will not shut down,’’ he vows. “Its form might change. But
that tree will not fall. We will not let it fall. It’s beyond my
imagination.’’</p>

<p>“It’s unique to us emotionally,’’ he continues. “Everything the white culture said we couldn’t do, <em>Ebony</em> said we could do and do it better. You’d have Frank Sinatra. Then <em>Ebony</em>
would display four pictures of Nat King Cole. You had an all-white
basketball league. We had the Globetrotters. We could play basketball
and entertain at the same time.’’</p>

<p>Back in the day, <em>Ebony</em> was the best way to keep up with the
latest happenings in black America. The African-American elite—the
movie stars, the singers, the ball players, the politicians, the
preachers, the scholars—were all part of her flock. They were eager to
talk to her about their trials and triumphs and then, if they were
lucky, grace her cover for the whole nation to see. They weren’t
appreciated—celebrated—anywhere else this way. To white magazines, they
were invisible. <em>Ebony</em>, they knew, would treat them with R-E-S-P-E-C-T.</p>

<p>She was good company. She was entertaining and informative while you
waited at the dentist’s office or beauty shop. Each year she listed the
most eligible black bachelors and bachelorettes in the country. If they
got together, she had useful advice about marriage and décor. She was a
role model, a mirror for the middle-class that reflected only dreams
come true. On coffee tables across black America, Bibles and issues of <em>Ebony</em> lay side by side. After all, they had the same message: look here for the promise of paradise.</p>

<p>Lots of people made fun of her, though, especially when the 1960s
rolled around and black patience with white racism had worn thin. Her
critics said <em>Ebony</em> was too moderate and soft for such momentous
times. They called her bourgeois and said her head was filled with
fluff. There was some truth in their harsh words. There still is.</p>

<p>But don’t let the glamour fool you. <em>Ebony</em> has a tough side,
too. She didn’t always wear flouncy ruffles and Yves St. Laurent shoes.
When she had to, she’d pull on a pair of sturdy boots and hit the
freedom trail, singing “We Shall Overcome.’’ During the civil rights
movement, <em>Ebony</em> and its petite sister publication <em>Jet</em>,
the pocket-sized weekly, marched along every step of the way. Moneta
Sleet Jr., the first black man to win a Pulitzer Prize for feature
photography, worked for <em>Ebony</em>. He won the award for <a href="http://www.plapperstorch.de/pulitzer/1969-2.jpg" target="_blank">a photograph</a> of Martin Luther King’s widow, Coretta Scott King, at the slain civil rights leader’s funeral in 1968. </p>

<p>For African Americans trapped in the segregated South, <em>Ebony</em>
was a lifeline to the outside world. She was the chronicler of
African-American firsts, source book of black pride and confidence.
Growing up in Greenville, South Carolina, in the ’40s and ’50s, Jesse
Jackson remembers how the magazine helped turn a dreamy black boy into
the globetrotting man who twice ran for president in the 1980s, helping
clear the path for Barack Obama’s history-shattering march to the White
House twenty years later.</p>

<p>Jackson says his family had issues of <em>Ebony</em> “stacked up like furniture.’’ Many of his teachers, he says, “used <em>Ebony</em> to teach black history. Black history wasn’t in our textbooks.’’</p>

<p>In the 1960s, when the latest issue arrived in the Arizona mailbox
of Dr. Clarence Laing and his wife, Laura, their young daughters, Mavis
and Mercedes, would risk ripping the pages in their tug of war to see
who would get to read it first. “There were just so few other black
people in Phoenix in those days,’’ Mavis Laing says. “<em>Ebony</em> was the only way we learned what was happening with African Americans.’’</p>

<p>But now <em>Ebony</em> needs money, not memories. Word is she owes her printer millions. <a href="http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/article.pl?articleId=32096" target="_blank">According to media reports</a>,
there’s a lien on her famous eleven-story headquarters in Chicago,
overlooking Grant Park. The same park where some 200,000 people
gathered to celebrate the realization of an <em>Ebony</em> reader’s wildest dreams: the election of a black president.</p>

<p>Last year, Linda Johnson-Rice, chairman and CEO of the company and the daughter of <em>Ebony</em>’s
founder, John H. Johnson, was reportedly seeking a buyer—or a partner
with deep pockets—to keep the magazine alive. (As this issue went to
press, Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=avSjYzOrv09s" target="_blank">reported</a>
that NBA legend Magic Johnson was interested in buying the company.)
Johnson-Rice declined to comment for this article. These are tough
times for her company, the Johnson Publishing Company (JPC), and her
family. Her mother, Eunice, who came up with the name <em>Ebony</em>,
died in January at age ninety-three. Her father died in 2005. In a
prepared statement, Wendy E. Parks, a company spokeswoman, said that
the privately held JPC does not disclose in-depth financial
information. “However,” she said, “I assure you that, like any
conservatively managed business, we are continuing to make strategic
decisions we believe are prudent to help us weather the current
economy.” </p>


<p>The malady afflicting <em>Ebony</em> is an industry-wide epidemic: not enough advertising; not enough readers. “<em>Ebony</em>’s
readership is dying off and it’s not being replaced,’’ says Charles
Whitaker, the Helen Gurley Brown Research Chair in Magazine Journalism
at the Medill School at Northwestern University and a former editor at <em>Ebony</em>. “I don’t see how they are going to make it. <em>Ebony</em> really has a tough road ahead.’’</p>

<p>According to Whitaker, <em>Ebony</em>’s circulation is around one
million, and dropping fast. In the early 1990s, the circulation was
about 1.8 million, he says. Although it has a Web site, <a href="http://www.ebonyjet.com/" target="_blank">EbonyJet.com</a>,
Whitaker says it has not done nearly enough with it to capture the
young black audience. Like everyone else, these readers have many
options in today’s fragmented, Internet-driven media market, including
the black-oriented, Time Warner-owned Essence magazine, <em>Ebony</em>’s most direct competitor.</p>

<p>Richard Prince, author of the online column <a href="http://www.mije.org/richardprince" target="_blank">Journal-isms</a>, says <em>Ebony</em> blew a perfect opportunity to make a new-media splash. It was <em>Ebony</em>
that was given the first interview with President-elect Barack Obama.
But instead of putting the interview on its Web site immediately, <em>Ebony</em>
waited to publish it weeks later in the magazine, apparently concerned
about hurting newsstand sales. In the meantime, the new president had
sat down with 60 Minutes, which quickly put its interview on the air.
“The whole effect of <em>Ebony</em> having the first interview was
lost,’’ Prince says. “They’re so afraid of undermining the print
product that they’re falling behind.’’</p>

<p>Yet in January, when the earth shook so violently beneath Haiti that Port-Au-Prince was reduced to rubble, <em>Ebony</em>’s director of photography, Dudley Brooks, traveled to the devastated island, <a href="http://www.ebonyjet.com/bigideas/?p=1583" target="_blank">blogging and shooting pictures for EbonyJet.com</a>: </p>

<blockquote>It was close to an hour-long drive to Titayen, a village on
the outskirts of Port-au-Prince, where small convoys of dump trucks
deposited the bodies of quake victims. I had heard stories that,
earlier in the week, hundreds had been deposited there—amidst the
garbage and debris. They were spread on the very field where Papa Doc
Duvalier deposited the remains of his enemies years ago . Mass graves
are easy to find—you follow the smell. It’s an acrid, powerful,
disturbing smell that, depending on the wind, can drift for miles. It
stays in your nose hairs and saturates your clothes.</blockquote>

<p>Powerful, timely, important stuff. That’s not all. In the last few months <em>Ebony</em>
and Jet have undergone attractive face lifts, with new features and a
sleek new look. But is it too little, too late? Whitaker, the Medill
professor, thinks it is. Three years ago, Whitaker turned the plight of
his old employer into a class project for his graduate students. The
assignment was how to save and rebrand <em>Ebony</em> for the twenty-first century. Company officials allowed the students access to some of <em>Ebony</em>’s
financial records, after requiring the class and the professor to sign
a confidentiality agreement, Whitaker says. When the project was over,
Whitaker says, he was “stunned’’ at how poorly <em>Ebony</em> was doing. “The bleeding we saw three years ago is hemorrhaging now,’’ he says. “There’s no way to stanch that.’’</p>

<p>Whitaker hopes he is wrong. He spent a total of ten years as an editor at <em>Ebony</em> between 1985 and 2002. “I became a journalist because I wanted to work for <em>Ebony</em>,’’ he says. “It will be tough to see it go. It’s an institution. But sometimes institutions become obsolete. If <em>Ebony</em> goes away, maybe it will allow someone else some room. Maybe it will give someone else incentive to replace it.’’</p>

<p><span class="dropcap">T</span>he founder of <em>Ebony</em>, the late John H. Johnson, borrowed $500 to start his first magazine, <em>Negro Digest</em>, in 1942, putting up his mother’s furniture as collateral. He created <em>Ebony</em> weeks after World War II ended, and a few years after that he launched <em>Jet</em>. For decades, these two periodicals have been the heart and soul of his now troubled media empire.</p>

<p>To be sure, Johnson created the magazines to make money. That he did
in abundance. His publications “formed powerful prototypes for success
in black media’’ and “set the standard for black business in America,’’
<a href="http://www.bvonmoney.com/2009/05/06/bottom-line-with-dr-boyce-why-ebony-and-jet-may-be-doomed/" target="_blank">writes Boyce Watkins</a>,
a finance professor at Syracuse University. But Johnson also wanted to
do more than that. He wanted to change hearts and minds. Johnson wanted
to show people on both sides of the color line a simple truth: black is
beautiful, too. </p>

<p>At a time when people of color almost never made it into the pages, let alone onto the covers, of <em>Life</em> or <em>Look</em>
or scores of other “mainstream’’—read white—publications, Johnson
sought to make African Americans and their accomplishments visible to
the whole world. As Julieanna L. Richardson, an African-American
archivist, puts it, “<em>Ebony</em> was a positive machine. It gave you a sense of self-worth.’’</p>

<p>“That need still exists,’’ she adds. “We’re still bombarded with
negative images. It affects the soul of our community. It affects the
world’s perception of us.’’</p>

<p><span class="dropcap">I</span>f <em>Ebony</em> belongs to the past,
then <a href="http://www.chrisrabb.com" target="_blank" title="ChrisRabb.com">Chris Rabb</a> and Cheryl Contee belong to the future. They are
among the frontiersmen and women of the increasingly expanding black
blogosphere. Rabb, forty, is the founder and “chief evangelist’’ of the
blog <a href="http://www.afro-netizen.com/" target="_blank">Afro-Netizen</a>.
He started the site of political and cultural commentary in 1999 as an
e-mail newsletter. Within eighteen months, he says, he had 10,000
subscribers. “It filled a gap,’’ Rabb says. “Everywhere I’d go and
there were more than a dozen black folks, someone would say, ‘Rabb, are
you the Afro-Netizen guy?’’’ </p>

<p>He is also the great-great-grandson of <a href="http://www.mdoe.org/murphyjohnh.html" target="_blank" title="About John Murphy">John Henry Murphy Sr.</a>, who
founded the Baltimore Afro American <a href="http://www.afro.com" target="_blank" title="The Afro">newspaper</a> in 1892. Rabb was on the
board of the Afro American for ten years but resigned in 2007 partly
because he felt the paper “wasn’t moving fast enough to integrate
technology into the business model.’’ </p>


<p>“Many of our institutions have fought technology because they thought it would run us out of business,’’ he says. “<em>Ebony</em>
was one of the strongest household brands in black America for decades.
It could have been a leader in social media. But family-owned
businesses tend to be the most conservative businesses. No one wants to
change a winning formula—until it’s too late.’’</p>

<p>Cheryl Contee, thirty-eight, is the founder of the blog <a href="http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/" target="_blank">Jack &amp; Jill Politics: A black bourgeoisie perspective on U.S. politics</a>. She grew up with <em>Ebony</em> and Jet, but has a hard time remembering the last time she’s read an issue. <em>Ebony</em>,
she says, has not updated its style or its use of the Web sufficiently
to fit modern African Americans. “I think they’re trying to catch up,’’
she says. “The question is whether they have time.’’</p>

<p>Contee believes that while race still matters, it does not matter
nearly as much as it did even a few years ago. “My experience in
America is very different than the lives of my parents and
grandparents,’’ she says. “If it weren’t for the increasing
assimilation of African Americans into society, then there wouldn’t be
a black president. I don’t know if <em>Ebony</em> and <em>Jet</em> necessarily acknowledge that reality.’’</p>

<p>Yet she says she started Jack and Jill Politics in 2006 because when
she surveyed the Internet she did not “find the voice of the
African-American middle class being respected and honored in any
significant way.’’</p>

<p>Of course, that’s the same reason John H. Johnson started <em>Ebony</em> in the 1940s.</p>

<p><span class="dropcap">V</span>eteran journalist Sylvester Monroe thought he had found his dream job when he joined <em>Ebony</em> as a senior editor in 2006. He had been a journalist for thirty-seven years, twenty-seven of them at <em>Time</em> and <em>Newsweek</em>. Monroe was lured to the magazine by the publisher’s promise that <em>Ebony</em>
was going to be different. It was going to make a splash on the
Internet and improve the writing in its print publications. “I was told
we were going to bring <em>Ebony</em> into the twenty-first century,’’
he says, “that we were going to make it more relevant, give it some
edge, bring it back to its old position as a relevant and important
publication.’’</p>

<p>Monroe had visions of a combination of <em>Ebony</em>, <em>Vanity Fair</em>, and <em>Emerge</em>,
the formerly hard-hitting but now defunct black monthly that once put
an image of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on the cover made up
to look like a lawn jockey. “It could have been the best job I ever
had,” Monroe says. “But almost as soon as I got there, things went
south.’’</p>

<p>Advertising revenues plummeted across the industry, and <em>Ebony</em>
put its grand ambitions on the back burner. Monroe hung on for as long
as he could, thinking once the economy turned around the job of
remaking <em>Ebony</em> would resume.</p>

<p>One day in 2007, more than a dozen members of <em>Ebony</em>’s
editorial staff were seated around a gleaming table in the eighth-floor
conference room, debating who should be included in the list of the
twenty-five “coolest’’ black men of all time. Monroe, who is in his
late fifties, and others nominated such notables as Muhammad Ali,
Denzel Washington, and Billy Dee Williams. The twenty- and
thirty-something staffers rolled their eyes. “Can’t we have someone
under fifty?’’ they pleaded.</p>

<p>Monroe says there was a generational tension between old and new over <em>Ebony</em>’s
future both inside and outside of the magazine. “Linda Johnson-Rice,’’
he says, “was always very concerned about walking the fine line between
bringing in new readers and not alienating its traditional base.’’</p>

<p>Monroe quit last year, “frustrated out of my mind’’ over a lack of money for writers and a coherent editorial direction. If <em>Ebony</em>
gives up as well, Monroe says, “My generation will be saddened and will
miss it. People under fifty probably won’t miss it at all. They feel <em>Ebony</em> has served its purpose.’’</p>

<p>Perhaps, but many of the issues of race and discrimination that <em>Ebony</em>
has addressed in the last six decades still exist, from soaring
African-American unemployment rates to a widening wealth chasm between
blacks and whites. Although there are younger, Internet-savvy voices
emerging to carry on the fight, these newcomers have not yet passed the
test of time. It would be a wasteful shame to lose <em>Ebony</em>’s experience and hard-earned authority. “There is a role for <em>Ebony</em>
still to play, beyond sentimental, particularly in the age of Obama,’’
Monroe says. “I think there is a dangerously erroneous perception that
now that Obama has reached the mountaintop, issues of race are no
longer important. Whether it is health care, education, or housing,
there are still huge gaps and a lot of work to do. To look at these
problems from an African-American perspective is more important than
ever.’’</p>

<p><span class="dropcap">E</span>very month, Johnson Publishing Company
puts the covers of its magazines in the huge window of its lobby, a
little old-school advertising. The other evening, as darkness fell over
Chicago and a cold wind blew down South Michigan Avenue, I stood in
front of JPC’s building, peering through the window at four large
photographs positioned there to face the street. One was <a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_M_KAaxo73L8/S2DAyPzhPjI/AAAAAAAAG_0/36Q8Xyxuhuk/s1600-h/jetCover2.jpg" target="_blank">a recent cover of <em>Jet</em></a>, featuring a smiling Michelle Obama. “Her Power of Influence,’’ the headline read. Next to her was the <a href="http://smartsexyrichcrazy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/kimora-djimon-ebony.jpg" target="_blank">February <em>Ebony</em> cover</a> promising, among other features, “Love Stories Revealed: How 8 Couples Keep It Going,’’ and “Demystifying Islam.’’ </p>

<p>A few inches from the giant reproductions was a similar-sized
photograph of John H. Johnson, the man who started it all. His
photograph was placed in the window after he died. Now a portrait of
his wife, Eunice, has been added.</p>

<p>I paid my respects to the Johnson parents but realized I’m not ready to say goodbye to their dream. I’m pulling hard for <em>Ebony</em>,
the dowager, to find that fountain of youth. Not tomorrow, but today. I
hear everything anyone could ever need or want can be found on the
Internet.</p>



							

					
			        		
							
	
						

                        

  

                


				</div></div>]]></content:encoded><description>As Julieanna L. Richardson, an African-American archivist, puts it, “Ebony was a positive machine. It gave you a sense of self-worth.’’

“That need still exists,’’ she adds. “We’re still bombarded with negative images. It affects the soul of our community. It affects the world’s perception of us.’’

If Ebony belongs to the past, then Chris Rabb and Cheryl Contee belong to the future. They are among the frontiersmen and women of the increasingly expanding black blogosphere. Rabb, forty, is the founder and “chief evangelist’’ of the blog Afro-Netizen. He started the site of political and cultural commentary in 1999 as an e-mail newsletter. Within eighteen months, he says, he had 10,000 subscribers. “It filled a gap,’’ Rabb says. “Everywhere I’d go and there were more than a dozen black folks, someone would say, ‘Rabb, are you the Afro-Netizen guy?’’’

He is also the great-great-grandson of John Henry Murphy Sr., who founded the Baltimore Afro American newspaper in 1892. Rabb was on the board of the Afro American for ten years but resigned in 2007 partly because he felt the paper “wasn’t moving fast enough to integrate technology into the business model.’’

“Many of our institutions have fought technology because they thought it would run us out of business,’’ he says. “Ebony was one of the strongest household brands in black America for decades. It could have been a leader in social media. But family-owned businesses tend to be the most conservative businesses. No one wants to change a winning formula—until it’s too late.’’</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/03/an-icon-fades-ebony-shaped-the-black-middle-class-then-misread-its-digital-moment.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>ColorOfChange.org: Demand the GOP stop inciting and supporting hate</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/x5tU0NaEt0Q/demand-the-gop-stop-inciting-and-supporting-hate.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>Crime &amp; Punishment</category><category>Elections/Campaigns/Voting</category><category>Politics</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Television</category><category>Action</category><category>Bigotry</category><category>Color of Change</category><category>ColorOfChange</category><category>ColorOfChange.org</category><category>Homophobia</category><category>Petition</category><category>Racism</category><category>Racist Slurs</category><category>Republican Party</category><category>Threats</category><category>Violence</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:39:09 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef01310fd28d72970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The hateful acts that occurred at the tea party rally in Washington this weekend were not isolated incidents -- they are part of a growing pattern of violent rhetoric, racially charged imagery, and paranoid conspiracy theories emerging from the Republican party's grassroots supporters.

</p><p>Republicans officials have contributed to this atmosphere with fear-mongering and coded racism, and they have actively courted this element of their party. <strong>It's time that Republican leadership is forced to address what it's helped to create.</strong>

</p><p><strong><a href="http://colorofchange.org/hate">Please join us in confronting Republican leaders</a> and demanding that they take responsibility</strong> for tamping down the bigotry and hate among their supporters, and that they disavow the fear-mongering that leads to it. And please ask your friends and family to do the same -- unless we take a strong stand against this kind of hate, it will continue. We need as many people as possible -- of every race -- demanding that it stop. 

</p><p>Our members are <a href="http://colorofchange.org/hate">calling on Michael Steele, John Boehner, and Mitch McConnell to do two things</a>:

</p><blockquote>
<p>
</p><ol>
<li>Unequivocally condemn bigotry and hate among your supporters, and make clear that those who embrace it have no place in your party and that you reject their support.
<p></p></li>
<li>Make clear that you will not tolerate fear-mongering and coded appeals to racism from officials in the Republican party, at any level.
</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>




<p>Here's the <a href="http://colorofchange.org/hate/message.html">message we sent to our members today</a>:
</p><blockquote>
<p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
</p><table align="right" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody><tr>
<td id="boxholder">

<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="border: 1px solid ; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 10px;" width="220">
<tbody><tr>
<td align="center" style="padding: 10px;">
<strong>
Racism and hate at Tea Parties is getting worse, and it has to stop.
</strong>
<table align="center"><tbody><tr><td align="center" style="padding: 10px;"><span>
<a href="http://act.colorofchange.org/go/hate/">
<img alt="Hate sign" border="0" src="http://www.colorofchange.org/hate/images/hate.jpg"></img></a>
<strong>Tell GOP leadership to stop condoning it now:</strong>
<table align="center"><tbody><tr><td>
<a href="http://act.colorofchange.org/go/hate/">
<img alt="Click here" border="0" src="http://www.colorofchange.org/images/clickherebutton.gif" style="display: block;"></img></a></td></tr></tbody></table></span></td></tr>
</tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table>Dear ColorOfChange.org member,

<p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
It's time to hold the Republican Party accountable.
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
<strong>You've probably heard about Tea Party members shouting "Nigger!" at Black Congressmen during a protest in Washington, D.C. last weekend.</strong> One of the protesters spat on Congressman Emmanuel Cleaver, while another called openly gay Representative Barney Frank a "faggot" as the laughing crowd imitated his lisp.<sup>1</sup>
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
But Saturday was just the most recent example of the intolerance and hate coming from right-wing extremists this past year. At times it's been instigated by Republican leaders. When not, it's usually condoned and seen as part of a strategy to score politically. <strong>Either way, it's completely unacceptable and has to stop.</strong>
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
It's time to confront Republican leadership and force them to take responsibility for the atmosphere they've helped create. Join us in drawing a line in the sand, and ask your friends and family to do the same:

</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
<a href="http://colorofchange.org/hate/">http://colorofchange.org/hate/</a>

</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
We're calling on RNC Chair Michael Steele, House Minority Leader John Boehner, and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to publicly do two simple things:
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
</p><ol>
<li>Unequivocally condemn bigotry and hate among their supporters, and make clear that those who embrace it have no place in their party.<br>
</li>
<li>Make clear that they will not tolerate fear-mongering and coded appeals to racism from officials in the Republican party, at any level.
</li>
</ol>
<p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
Republican leaders publicly denounced Saturday's ugly scene, <strong>but they failed to acknowledge that this is only the latest incident in a pattern of violent rhetoric, racially charged imagery, and paranoid conspiracy theories at Tea Party rallies.</strong><sup>2</sup> Many Tea Partiers aren't simply about dissent -- they use fear and hatred to assault the very legitimacy of our elected leaders. It's the worst America has to offer.

</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
Despite this, Republican leaders court the Tea Party movement while methodically supporting, exacerbating and exploiting their fear and anger for cynical political ends.<sup>3</sup> This is nothing less than a betrayal of American values, and it's up to us to force the Republicans to stop aiding and abetting this enterprise:
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
<a href="http://colorofchange.org/hate/">http://colorofchange.org/hate/</a>
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
The Tea Party movement has been marked by racially inflammatory and violent outbursts since its inception a year ago. GOP leaders are trying to pass off this weekend's assaults on Congressmen Lewis, Cleaver, Clyburn and Frank as isolated incidents. But when so-called "isolated incidents" crop up again and again, a pattern starts to emerge. The examples are numerous. 
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
At rallies held to protest tax day last year, Tea Partiers carried signs that announced "Obama's Plan: White Slavery," "The American Taxpayers are the Jews for Obama's Oven," and "Guns Tomorrow!"<sup>4</sup> The Republican National Committee had endorsed the rallies, and RNC Chairman Michael Steele encouraged Tea Partiers to send a "virtual tea bag" to President Obama and Democratic Congressional leadership.<sup>5</sup> After reports of the fear-mongering signs surfaced, Steele did nothing to distance his party from the lunatic fringe. He has even gone so far as to say that if he didn't have his current position, he'd be "out there with the tea partiers."<sup>6</sup> Some Republican governors even planned a "Tea Party 2.0" for the following month in an effort to build on the rallies' momentum.<sup>7</sup>

</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
The Tea Party's venomous rhetoric picked up steam over the summer, when angry mobs flooded town hall meetings legislators had organized as sites for rational, civil debate on health care reform. After one meeting in Atlanta, a swastika was painted on the office of Congressman David Scott (D-GA), who had also received a flier addressed to "nigga David Scott." <sup>8</sup> Some protesters showed up at town hall meetings carrying guns, including at least one man who was armed at an event where the President was speaking <sup>9</sup>. Again, Republicans responded to these tactics with silence, doing nothing to denounce them.
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
Similarly, there was no public outcry from Republican leadership when Mark Williams, a leader of the Tea Party movement, was exposed for having described the President as "an Indonesian Muslim turned welfare thug and a racist in chief" on his blog.<sup>10</sup> Instead, members of the GOP continued to show up to and endorse Tea Party rallies. And as recently as Sunday -- the day that the historic health care bill passed the House -- Republican members of the House riled up the same Tea Party crowd that had earlier harassed their fellow members with hate and bigotry.
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
<strong>Our country deserves better than this. No matter what party one supports, we should all take strong action to support civil, honest, and respectful public debate.</strong> Can you take a moment to call on Michael Steele, John Boehner, and Mitch McConnell to denounce the racist rhetoric and fear-mongering that have been ongoing, significant characteristics of the Tea Party movement, and tell those who embrace these divisive and un-American beiefs that they have no place in their party, as members or leaders? And when you do, please ask your family and friends to do the same:
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">

<a href="http://colorofchange.org/hate/">http://colorofchange.org/hate/</a>
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
Thanks and Peace,
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
-- James, Gabriel, William, Dani, Milton and the rest of the ColorOfChange.org team
<br>   March 23rd, 2010
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">

1. "Tea Party Protests: 'Ni**er,' 'Fa**ot' Shouted At Members Of Congress," Huffington Post, 3-20-2010<br>
http://huff.to/atRmru

</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">

2. "10 Most Offensive Tea Party Signs And Extensive Photo Coverage From Tax Day Protests," Huffington Post, 4-16-09<br>

http://huff.to/9Sgf3S

</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">

3. "Memo Reveals GOP Plan to Exploit Fear of Obama," AOL News, 3-4-2010<br>
http://huff.to/c4ZOH4

</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">

4. See Reference 2
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">

5. "Tax Day Tea Parties Officially Endorsed By Republican Party," Huffington Post, 5-15-2009<br>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/14/tax-day-tea-parties-offic_n_186788.html
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">

6. "Steele: I'd join the tea parties," Politico, 1-15-10<br>

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31177.html

</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
7. "GOP govs plan Tea Party sequel," Politico, 5-12-2009<br>
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22436.html
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">

8. "Rep. David Scott's (D-Ga) office spray-painted with Swastika," Daily Kos, 8-11-2009<br>
http://bit.ly/8YInIb
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">

9. "Armed and Dangerous?" Talking Points Memo, 8-11-2009<br>
http://bit.ly/LV1wb
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">

10. "Tea party leader calls Obama a welfare thug," The Loop, 9-15-09<br>
http://theloop21.com/news/teaparty-leaders-calls-obama-welfare-thug
</p><p style="margin: 1em 0px;">
</p></blockquote></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The hateful acts that occurred at the tea party rally in Washington this weekend were not isolated incidents -- they are part of a growing pattern of violent rhetoric, racially charged imagery, and paranoid conspiracy theories emerging from the Republican party's grassroots supporters.

Republicans officials have contributed to this atmosphere with fear-mongering and coded racism, and they have actively courted this element of their party. It's time that Republican leadership is forced to address what it's helped to create. </description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/03/demand-the-gop-stop-inciting-and-supporting-hate.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>What White People Fear</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/MgAy4UAr-gg/what-white-people-fear.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>conservatives</category><category>inequality</category><category>liberals</category><category>privilege</category><category>race</category><category>race relations</category><category>racial discrimination</category><category>racial justice</category><category>racial politics</category><category>Racism</category><category>white supremacy</category><category>white-skin privilege</category><category>whiteness</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:09:31 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a93c9ae9970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>By Robert Jensen<br></strong><p><strong>Republished courtesy of <a href="http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/america-the-remix/what-white-people-fear" target="_blank" title="YES! Magazine: What White People Fear">YES! Magazine</a></strong></p>In the struggle for racial justice, it’s time to pay more attention to the fears of white people. <br><br>In a white-dominated world, that may seem counter-intuitive. In the racial arena, what do we white people have to be afraid of?<br><br>There are lots of things to fear in this world, of course; race is not the only aspect of life in which people face injustice and inequality. A majority of people of all colors (including working-class and poor whites) struggles economically in a predatory corporate capitalist system, and all women, regardless of race, cope with gender discrimination and the threat of sexual violence in a male-dominated world.<br><br>But what fears could white people have as white people?<br><br>Understanding the fears behind the racial politics of both conservative and liberal whites can help guide strategy for changing a society in which wealth and well-being are still tied to race. And make no mistake, there is still a racialized gap between white and non-white America on measures of wealth and well-being—income, home ownership, graduation rates, access to health care, infant mortality, etc. In fact, the gap between white and black America on some of these measures is greater today than in the immediate aftermath of the major legislative achievements of the civil rights movement, and on some measures the rate of improvement is so glacial that it will be decades, if not centuries, before we reach equality. The legislative achievements that ended legal apartheid in America were a great victory, but the economic apartheid that remains is a reminder of our failures.<br><br>Put bluntly: The United States abolished a formal apartheid system but remains a white-supremacist society. After more than a decade of writing and speaking about these issues, which has sparked lots of feedback from all political angles, here’s what I have concluded about white folks and our fears.<br><p><strong>Aren’t We Special?</strong></p><p>For conservative white people, the dominant fear is of someday living without the privilege that comes with whiteness. Polite conservatives defend the primacy of “Western civilization.” More reactionary whites are openly racist about the threat that non-white peoples pose to “our way of life.” Both versions defend the existing distribution of wealth and power, even though many of the working-class and poor whites who endorse such views have access to precious little wealth or power. Race is used by white elites today, just as it was in the nation’s formative years, to drive a wedge between people who would otherwise come together to challenge those elites. Divide-and-conquer strategies, it seems, never go out of style.</p>Liberals are quick to denounce both the thinly veiled and the openly reactionary conservative racism. But what of the fears of liberals? White liberals might reject the very idea that they are afraid, citing their support for diversity and multiculturalism. But my experience suggests that while white liberals reject assertions of white supremacy, many fear the loss of white centrality. They are willing to renounce the idea that white people are superior, as long as they are allowed to live comfortably in a world where white is the norm.<br><br>In short, both the conservative and liberal positions are based on the same underlying assertion: “I’m white, and I’m special.” Conservatives are more likely to say it openly, while liberals tend to offer platitudes about racial justice while avoiding the risks required to make good on anti-racist principles.<br><br>What remains obscured is the distinctly uncivilized nature that Europeans and European Americans exhibited during their barbarous conquest of much of the world. The inherently fragile sense of white self-importance that emerges from that history is at the core of white fears—at some level, we all know that the truth of the depravity of white supremacy belies claims of white superiority.<br><br>In the institutions that adopt the liberal view, diversity is just fine (as long as whites remain in control) and multiculturalism can flourish (as long as white norms remain dominant). Institutions defined by the values and practices rooted in white Europe can open up to non-white people, as long as we white people remain comfortable. In such a white-defined liberal world, “people of color”—abstracted into a single group, erasing the particularity of people—are welcome, even sought after, to prove that we have transcended white supremacy.<br><p><strong>Getting Uncomfortable</strong></p><p>This analysis of the dynamics of mixed-race settings is hardly original. Non-white people have long recognized that white liberals are happy to engage with folks who aren’t white as long as their white-centric worldview isn’t threatened, and that white groups are happy to have non-white members as long as the power dynamics don’t change.</p>I observe all this not from some arrogant high ground, but as someone stuck in the same dynamic, struggling to get out. I know that for all my writing and political work on racial justice, I still feel most comfortable in settings where my understanding of the world defines the interaction, no matter the racial composition of the group. Rather than pretend otherwise, I start with that reality and search for ways to move forward.<br><p>I have a choice: I can rest comfortably in the privileges that come with being white, or I can struggle to be fully human.</p><p>A first step for me has been to question the value of the seemingly endless “race dialogues” that are popular in white liberal groups. In the pseudo- therapeutic setting of such dialogues, with more talk about personal healing than about political change, white people are guaranteed that we won’t be forced out of a white-defined world. White-dominated institutions—corporations, nonprofits, universities, government agencies—are happy to sponsor such dialogues, diversity trainings, and multicultural events, precisely because they don’t threaten the fundamental distribution of wealth and power.</p><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 16px; color: #0000bf;"><strong>White-dominated institutions . . . are happy to sponsor such dialogues, diversity
trainings, and multicultural events, precisely because they don’t
threaten the fundamental distribution of wealth and power.</strong></span> </p><p>I have been involved in many of those events myself, as a facilitator or a participant, and I have learned from them (typically as much from my failures as successes). The most important lesson I take away is that race dialogues are not enough. As long as we stay confined in a safe world that doesn’t challenge power, we guarantee failure—if our goal really is to change the distribution of that power.</p><p>There’s no easy recipe for this kind of challenge, but we move in the right direction when we seek out places where we don’t feel comfortable, looking for relationships in which we can help change the dynamic. For me, that means putting myself in situations where I have to face my fear of being seen—or, more accurately, being seen-through—by non-white people. What if I step into those uncomfortable spaces and non-white people see the ways in which I hang onto some sense of my own supremacy/centrality? What if they see the ways in which I haven’t shaken off my racist cultural training?</p><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 16px;"><strong>I have a choice: I can rest comfortably in the privileges that come with being white, or I can struggle to be fully human.</strong></span></div><p><a href="http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/america-the-remix/what-white-people-fear" target="_blank" title="Yes! Magazine: What White People Fear">Read more</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>For conservative white people, the dominant fear is of someday living without the privilege that comes with whiteness. Polite conservatives defend the primacy of “Western civilization.” More reactionary whites are openly racist about the threat that non-white peoples pose to “our way of life.” Both versions defend the existing distribution of wealth and power, even though many of the working-class and poor whites who endorse such views have access to precious little wealth or power. Race is used by white elites today, just as it was in the nation’s formative years, to drive a wedge between people who would otherwise come together to challenge those elites. Divide-and-conquer strategies, it seems, never go out of style.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/03/what-white-people-fear.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Embracing Precious: The nuances and truths in the individual and collective stories we tell</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/INt4Nq-x6ps/embracing-precious-the-nuances-and-truths-in-the-individual-and-collective-stories-we-tell.html</link><category>Arts &amp; Entertainment</category><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Family</category><category>Film</category><category>Gender</category><category>Parenting</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Youth/Children</category><category>African Americans</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>crack cocaine</category><category>deindustrialization</category><category>drugs</category><category>Gabourey Sidibe</category><category>Hollywood</category><category>Imani Perry</category><category>imprisonment</category><category>joblessness</category><category>Mo'nique</category><category>Oscars</category><category>poverty</category><category>Precious</category><category>racism</category><category>Reagonomics</category><category>structural inequality</category><category>underclass</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:30:56 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a9271d18970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>By <a href="http://www.imaniperry.com/" target="_blank" title="About Imani Perry">Imani Perry</a></strong></p><p><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></p><p><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a926dd8f970b-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="ImaniPerryHeadshot1" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a926dd8f970b " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a926dd8f970b-120wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;"></img></a> These are strange days indeed. We are firmly into the 21st century, and yet the 80s are haunting us. For African Americans it is yet again a decade of dream and deferral. </p><p>Back in the ‘80s, for the young Black and college educated, the doors of corporate America and other professions opened up and broadened the spectrum of the Black middle class like never before. But also, back in the ‘80s, crack cocaine and the aftermath of deindustrialization crippled areas of concentrated blackness in major urban centers. </p>Now in the 21st century, a new Black elite floods the popular imagination as Capitol Hill, the president and his administration become more and more colorful. But also now, in the 21st century, the recession hits Black communities hardest, and at the intersection of devastating rates of imprisonment, joblessness, and inadequate education lie a critical, hurting, mass of Black Americans.<br><br>Then came Precious. <br><br><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a926eba5970b-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="Precious-Sidibe1" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a926eba5970b " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a926eba5970b-320wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;"></img></a> The film, released in the Fall of 2009 elicited a flurry of responses. The debates over the film were complex, nuanced, impassioned. In fact, among the Black intelligentsia there seemed to be more discussion about Precious than there was about President Obama’s education agenda, the stimulus package, or rising unemployment and imprisonment. That was troubling. But then again, it is easier to fire off a blog post or provide a commentary about a movie than it is to write a concise response to a complicated web of policy, law, and economics. However, I believe the film elicited so much engaged response precisely because it highlighted the challenge of this moment when it comes to race in America. <br><br><p>The film tells an individual story, a poignant one, about an abused young woman in Harlem in the 1980s. If we attend to the individual story, fictional though it may be, our hearts go out to Precious. We see in her story personal resilience, possibility, healing. Those are good things.</p><p><a href="http://www.weareallprecious.com/" target="_blank" title="WeAreAllPrecious.com">The film</a> tells a collective story. The story it tells is about the devastation that the 80s wrought on Black communities, and the failure of the public school system to provide a path out for “the underclass.” </p><p><strong>In both the collective story and the individual story, there is truth.</strong> There is a real Precious out there. The story is fictional, but it is human. The problem is that fictional stories, especially ones on film, don’t just stand as individual stories, but they do “representative work.” They become part of the way we make sense of the world in which we live. The story of one novelist or filmmaker’s imagination becomes the story of entire groups of people or “types” of people. This is especially true when the kind of social location depicted in the story is remote from the experience of the majority of the viewers.</p><div style="text-align: center;"><p><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 16px; font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>We . . . yearn for the stories of those who sustain humanity and decency
in the face of devastating poverty and marginalization . . . for those stories . . . are, after all, far more
representative of Black life than the wreck that is Precious’ life.</strong></span></p></div><p>On the one hand, many of us who are familiar with the way the story of Black America in the 80s was told, and the way the story of the rise of imprisonment in contemporary Black America is being told, are frustrated with the spectacle of Black violence, deviance, and dysfunction that appears over and over again. We are tired of this story of pathology that we see yet again in Precious. Instead we want a story that reveals the laws and policies and economic conditions that produce concentrated poverty and its violence. We also yearn for the stories of those who sustain humanity and decency in the face of devastating poverty and marginalization. We would prefer for those stories to be told because they are, after all, far more representative of Black life than the wreck that is Precious’ life. </p><p>And so, we balk at a film like Precious, rhetorically asking: Doesn’t it just recycle those old images of Black pathology? And isn’t it reviving those stories just when we are beginning to suffer so much again, just when we don’t need a convenient explanation of “they are pathological” to facilitate the nation turning its back on the responsibility to provide conditions for all citizens to lead productive lives as participants in the democracy and economy? </p><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 16px; color: #0000bf; font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>[S]ome of us want to embrace a film like Precious because it highlights a kind of suffering that our society fails to respond to.</strong></span></p><p>On the other hand, some of us want to embrace a film like Precious because it highlights a kind of suffering that our society fails to respond to. Children who are poor and of color, are inadequately protected in our society. They are more vulnerable to predators, more likely to be victimized on the street and in school, and less likely to have families that are able to marshal resources to deal with trauma, mental illness, and addiction. At the same time, poor, emotionally scarred parents who become abusers have virtually no resources to repair themselves.  So when we see a movie like Precious, we applaud it for encouraging sympathy and investment in young women like Precious. We think “yes, the reality of her life deserves to be depicted, maybe it will inspire action.” </p><p>The film does both kinds of work on the audience at once. Strange indeed. </p><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a926ec39970b-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="Monique-precious1" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a926ec39970b " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a926ec39970b-320wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;"></img></a> Earlier, I referred to how the film reveals the challenge of this moment. The  challenge is this:  When it comes to race: critically thinking members of this society have to consider the implications of symbolism (like the Black president, or the Oscar worthy dysfunctional sexual abusing welfare mother played by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mo%27Nique" target="_blank" title="Wikipedia: Mo'nique">Mo'nique</a>) at the same time as we consider the messy, complicated, content of our society, without assuming that these things have a clear or consistent relationship to each other. <br><p>Additionally, the film demands that we bring more to the table than just an analysis of its as a piece of art. If the film stands alone, it gets deployed and interpreted every which way. But if we use the film to open the door to conversations about society, ones that are filled with knowledge, data, and careful analysis, rather than mere anecdote and fiction, then it can do some useful work in our social and political lives. Perhaps it can inspire solutions to problems of representation and policy challenges. </p><p>President Obama is on our televisions, and a young Black man is selling drugs on a corner near my home in Philadelphia. Precious is on our movie screen, and my classes are filled with brilliant young Black women pursuing degrees at a world class university. These are realities. But what relationships do these individuals have to each other and to the society at large, and how do those relationships reveal the resilience of inequality or the promise of democracy? </p><p>Asking and answering these sorts of questions is key for understanding race in the 21st century United States. </p><p></p><p><em><a href="http://www.princeton.edu/africanamericanstudies/people/faculty/imani-perry/" target="_blank" title="About Prof. Perry">Imani Perry</a> is a professor at Princeton University and regular contributor to Afro-Netizen. She is an interdisciplinary scholar who studies race and
African American culture using the tools provided by various
disciplines including: law, literary and cultural studies, music, and
the social sciences.</em></p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The film, Precious, demands that we bring more to the table than just an analysis of its as a piece of art. If the film stands alone, it gets deployed and interpreted every which way. But if we use the film to open the door to conversations about society, ones that are filled with knowledge, data, and careful analysis, rather than mere anecdote and fiction, then it can do some useful work in our social and political lives. Perhaps it can inspire solutions to problems of representation and policy challenges.

President Obama is on our televisions, and a young Black man is selling drugs on a corner near my home in Philadelphia. Precious is on our movie screen, and my classes are filled with brilliant young Black women pursuing degrees at a world class university. These are realities. But what relationships do these individuals have to each other and to the society at large, and how do those relationships reveal the resilience of inequality or the promise of democracy? </description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/03/embracing-precious-the-nuances-and-truths-in-the-individual-and-collective-stories-we-tell.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Watch: Comcast/NBC's Big Diversity Problem (VIDEO)</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/Gs2fsh7xoXg/watch-comcastnbcs-big-diversity-problem-video.html</link><category>Arts &amp; Entertainment</category><category>Business &amp; Entrepreneurship</category><category>Economy/Finance</category><category>Entertainment/Sports</category><category>Media Reform</category><category>Media/Technology</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Television</category><category>Comcast</category><category>Comcast/NBC merger</category><category>Congress</category><category>Maxine Waters</category><category>media consolidation</category><category>media democracy</category><category>media diversity</category><category>media justice</category><category>media reform</category><category>Sheila Jackson Lee</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:04:00 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef01310f5a1106970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><object height="340" width="560"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/n_utaMIjvVo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/n_utaMIjvVo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560"></embed></object>

NBC and Comcast execs reveal their major diversity problems during a Feb. 25 House investigation on Comcast's proposed takeover of NBC.</p><p>What do you think?</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>NBC and Comcast execs reveal their major diversity problems during a Feb. 25 House investigation on Comcast's proposed takeover of NBC.

What do you think?
</description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/Y5vgXp_6koE/n_utaMIjvVo&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" fileSize="1048" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>NBC and Comcast execs reveal their major diversity problems during a Feb. 25 House investigation on Comcast's proposed takeover of NBC. What do you think? </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>NBC and Comcast execs reveal their major diversity problems during a Feb. 25 House investigation on Comcast's proposed takeover of NBC. What do you think? </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/03/watch-comcastnbcs-big-diversity-problem-video.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/Y5vgXp_6koE/n_utaMIjvVo&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" length="1048" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.youtube.com/v/n_utaMIjvVo&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>University of California Swindle: California’s Apartheid Schoolhouse</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/AOjmCF0NhWE/university-of-california-swindle-californias-apartheid-schoolhouse.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>Crime &amp; Punishment</category><category>Current Affairs</category><category>Education</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>African Americans</category><category>bigotry</category><category>campus politics</category><category>multiculturalism</category><category>racism</category><category>students of color</category><category>UCSD</category><category>universities</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:57:49 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef01310f5a01ed970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<strong>By Sikivu Hutchinson<br></strong><strong>Guest Contributor</strong><p>On March 4th, as the University of California San Diego continues to roil with the fallout from the so-called <a href="http://news.google.com/news?q=%22Compton%20Cookout%22&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;hl=en&amp;tab=wn" target="_blank" title="Google News: &quot;Compton Cookout&quot;">Compton Cookout</a>, thousands of students and faculty will participate in statewide protests against a draconian budget that has cut a bloody swath into California’s public universities. UC and Cal State student activists across the state are calling for an end to the “privatization” of public higher education. </p><p>Activists charge that university officials are increasingly siphoning funding for instruction to research and development through byzantine private investment schemes. In addition, there is a growing trend to give preference to out-of-state students who pay higher admission fees. The majority of these students are not from historically underrepresented African American and Latino communities. </p><p>This strategy essentially reduces spots for working class students of color who are far more likely to rely on financial aid. While UC chancellor Mark Yudoff recently boasted of an $800,000 salary and perks to star faculty, “grunt” faculty and staff were laid off or forced to take furlough days, classes were canceled, program funding was curtailed and a draconian 32% tuition hike was proposed. Yudoff’s king’s ransom was garnered on the backs of California students of color who will be denied access to a system that is nationally regarded as the “Rolls Royce” of public higher education. </p><p>For those experienced with the business of white supremacist higher education politics, the UCSD administration’s pro forma soul searching, public denunciations and earnest pledges to discipline the “Cookout” offenders are all tiresomely familiar. In 2005, a Black female student at the private California Institute of the Arts found vulgar anti-Black epithets scrawled in her dorm room and degrading anti-Black graffiti had been written on an artwork in the Institute’s gallery. </p><p>In response to the incidents, the campuses’ Black Student Union organized protests and meetings with the administration which yielded few commitments to long term change. The school’s miniscule Black and Latino population was imperiled by scant financial aid, invisibility in the Eurocentric curriculum and the paucity of faculty mentors of color. </p><p>White faculty fiercely defended their liberal/progressive credentials with showy claims of multiculti “down-ness.” The college president publicly invoked his appreciation for Martin Luther King and deplored the hate crime as an isolated incident. When I was hired in 2006 to teach Cal Arts’ first Women of Color in the U.S. course, the campus was still festering with resentment and racial unrest. Pushing for campus climate change in a group of faculty and student advocates, I presented at endless meetings in which the administration stonewalled on redressing institutional bias through professional development training. The perpetrators had been given a slap on the wrist and it was business as usual in the “liberal” “inclusive” world of arts education that privileged the canon of the white avant garde. </p><p>During an interview on CNN, UCSD Ethnic Studies professor <a href="http://www.ethnicstudies.ucsd.edu/faculty/sckaplan.shtml" target="_blank" title="UCSD: Prof. Kaplan">Sara Clark Kaplan</a> outlined the crux of the problem with scapegoating individuals in the midst of a systemic crisis. It’s simply not acceptable to blame the university’s egregious disregard for the needs of students of color on the bigoted acts of ignorant white or “minority” students. UCSD’s gross under-representation of Black students reflects the UC system’s institutional neglect of recruitment and outreach to African American high schools. The devastating impact of Proposition 209 (which prohibited California public universities from using affirmative action admissions criteria) has been a convenient smokescreen for maintaining segregation in the UC system. </p><p>When I taught at UCLA in 2001 at the Graduate School of Education I had only one African American student in my course on culturally relevant pedagogy. Black students had gone from having a vibrantly visible presence during my stint as a student there during the late 80s and early 90s to barely registering. In some instances it was more difficult for accomplished African American seniors from highly regarded predominantly Black Los Angeles high schools like King-Drew Medical Magnet to get into UCLA than Ivy League colleges. </p><p>At slightly more than 1%, UCSD’s Black student enrollment is yet another indictment of the UC’s disgraceful wholesale complicity with the spirit of 209. As part of its demands to administration, UCSD’s Black Student Union has called on the university to step up its recruitment and retention efforts for underrepresented students. They have also pressed for more recruitment of diverse faculty and granting of tenure to faculty of color.</p>Recruitment, retention and tenure are important goals. Yet the deeper question of the lack of cultural responsiveness of the faculty and administration is a thornier issue. The ghettoization of ethnic studies and other so-called “minority-oriented” interdisciplinary departments contributes to a segregation of cultural knowledge in which the historical foundations of racial apartheid are obscured. Racism is viewed as a series of misguided individual acts rather than as an integral part of American national identity, power and authority. At core, the UCSD events are merely another manifestation of the post-racial fallacy that plays out every day in California’s first world apartheid classrooms.<br><br><p><em>Sikivu Hutchinson is the editor of blackfemlens.org and the author of the forthcoming Moral Combat: Black Atheists, Gender Politics and Secular America. </em></p>]]></content:encoded><description>On March 4th, as the University of California San Diego continues to roil with the fallout from the so-called Compton Cookout, thousands of students and faculty will participate in statewide protests against a draconian budget that has cut a bloody swath into California’s public universities. UC and Cal State student activists across the state are calling for an end to the “privatization” of public higher education.

Activists charge that university officials are increasingly siphoning funding for instruction to research and development through byzantine private investment schemes. In addition, there is a growing trend to give preference to out-of-state students who pay higher admission fees. The majority of these students are not from historically underrepresented African American and Latino communities.
</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/03/university-of-california-swindle-californias-apartheid-schoolhouse.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Beck's UK broadcast runs without ads; over 100 companies have ditched Beck</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/Gw-c5kwAfC4/becks-uk-broadcast-runs-without-ads-over-100-companies-have-ditched-beck.html</link><category>Television</category><category>Action</category><category>Advertising</category><category>Color of Change</category><category>ColorOfChange.org</category><category>Fox News</category><category>Glenn Beck</category><category>Race-Baiting</category><category>StopBeck.com</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:37:29 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a8a72d3d970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Yesterday, for the fifth day in a row, <b>the UK broadcast of Glenn Beck's TV show was forced to run without any advertisements.</b>  This is thanks to efforts by StopBeck.com to pressure companies advertising on Beck's UK broadcast.

<p>It's an amazing milestone in the larger effort to push advertisers away from Glenn Beck, which started last July.  And at the same time, we've reached another important milestone -- over 100 companies have now stopped their ads from appearing on Beck's show.

<p>From our press release:

<blockquote>
<p>The U.K. broadcast of Glenn Beck's eponymous television program was forced to air free of paid advertisements on four consecutive days last week. This according to StopBeck.com, an extension of the anti-Beck campaign created by ColorOfChange.org. StopBeck.com confirmed that, with the latest group of defections from Beck's overseas broadcast, Fox News Channel was forced to fill commercial breaks with news headlines and local weather updates from its U.K.-based sister network, Sky News, instead of paid advertisements.

<p>The news comes on the heels of a new group of U.S. companies who have asked Fox News Channel to stop their ads from running or pledged not to run ads on the show going forward. The latest U.S. defections -- Allstate Insurance, Anheuser-Busch, Best Western International, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals (maker of Flomax), Brother International Corporation, Hear Music, Idaho Potato Commission, Intersections Inc., Le Cordon Bleu Culinary School, Marriott International, Nestlé USA, Republic of Macedonia, Starkist Co., United Healthcare, USFidelis, Volkswagen and Western Union -- coupled with the international movement to bring the total number of companies distancing themselves from Beck to over one hundred. 

<p>"We're incredibly thrilled that StopBeck.com has taken our campaign and successfully executed it internationally," said James Rucker, Executive Director of ColorOfChange.org. "This is a huge blow against Glenn Beck. As we continue our fight against those that support Beck domestically, we will use this victory as further proof that more and more companies are taking a stand against his racial demagoguery." 

<p>"People now on both sides of the Atlantic are using Twitter and other social media to let companies know that by advertising on Beck's program, they are subsidizing hate," said Angelo S. Carusone, lead organizer of StopBeck.com.  "Fox News' willingness to use filler from Sky News, rather than address Beck's fear mongering, raises real questions about the network's priorities."
</blockquote>

<p>While Beck's UK broadcast has been forced to run without ads, his US broadcast has been reduced to running promos for other shows on Fox, ads from direct marketers (think exercise equipment and gold coins) and a handful of private companies headed by right-wingers.

<p>If you want to participate in StopBeck's efforts, you can find them on the web at <a href="http://stopbeck.com/">StopBeck.com</a> and <a href="http://stopbeckuk.info/">StopBeckUK.info</a>, and follow them on twitter at <a href="http://twitter.com/stopbeck">@StopBeck</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/StopGlennBeck">@StopGlennBeck</a>.

<p>Here are statements from the most recent group of U.S. advertisers distancing themselves from Beck:

<blockquote>
<p>"While we do purchase advertising on Fox News Channel, we did not intentionally purchase commercials in or around the show, 'The Glen [sic] Beck Program,' nor do we sponsor the program," said Jennifer L. Egeland, director of integrated marketing communications for Allstate Insurance Company, in an email to ColorOfChange.org. "You should not expect to see Allstate advertising during this program in the future."

<p>"Our company has not agreed to advertise during the Glenn Beck show," said Johnny Furr, vice president of community affairs for Anheuser-Busch, in an email to ColorOfChange.org. "We purchase advertising on the Fox News Channel for time slots other than this show, and the ad you saw inadvertently ran during that program."

<p>"Best Western ads will no longer run during the Glenn Beck show," said Troy Rutman, director of external communications for Best Western International, in an email to ColorOfChange.org. "As a global, family-oriented brand with guests of all persuasions and viewpoints, we seek to avoid any controversial programming, regardless of political affiliation."

<p>"Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. does not intend to advertise during the Glen [sic] Beck Show and has communicated this to the FOX network," said Susan Holz, Senior PR Specialist for the company, in an email to ColorOfChange.org.

<p>"Moving forward, Brother won't have it on there [Beck's show]," said Peggy Carlton, account executive for Brother International at MS&L Worldwide, in a voice mail message to ColorOfChange.org. "Moving forward there won't be any specifically on Glenn Beck."
"We in no way want to promote the hateful rhetoric of Mr. Glenn Beck, and therefore take this matter very seriously," said Dino Balzano, director of advertising at Concord Music Group, parent company of Hear Music, in an email to ColorOfChange.org. "Although we did not specifically request the airing to take place on that show, we did buy time on Fox News, and the spot happened to air during Beck's program. After we were made aware of the situation, we made the immediate decision to insist all further of our scheduled Fox airings were not on Glenn Beck."

<p>"It has been our long-standing policy to not advertise on any controversial programs," said Frank Muir, President & CEO of the Idaho Potato Commission, in an email to ColorOfChange.org. "We have informed FOX that the Idaho Potato Commission will no longer advertise on the Glen [sic] Beck Show." 

<p>"I first learned about this controversy [in November] and asked Fox to take his show out of our rotation," said Steve Schwartz, executive vice president of consumer services for Intersections, Inc., in an email to ColorOfChange.org. "We no longer advertise on Glenn Beck's show."
Angela Loiacono, manager of corporate communications at Career Education Corporation (CEC), parent company of Le Cordon Bleu Culinary School, confirmed that CEC had asked Fox News not to allow its ads to run during Glenn Beck's program. "Our commercials…should be off-air in mid-February," said Loiacono in an email to ColorOfChange.org.

<p>"We do not intend to have any additional ad placements during the program," said Jeff Flaherty, spokesperson for Marriott International, in an email to ColorOfChange.org. "I'd like to point out that diversity and inclusion are core values at Marriott and an essential component of our success."

<p>"We do not advertise on the Glenn Beck radio or television show," said Cathy Johnson, consumer services manager for Nestle USA, in an email to ColorOfChange.org. "Nestlé USA has family friendly programming guidelines in place that are routinely monitored and enforced. However, we are aware of a recent commercial that aired during the Glenn Beck show. Airing the spot on FOX and this program was an error that has been corrected."

<p>"Although we only have a few more spots left to air on Fox, we have requested that the remaining spots not be aired during Glenn Beck's program," said Natali Rancevic, a spokesperson for the Republic of Macedonia, Agency of Foreign Investments, in an email to ColorOfChange.org. "Fox has agreed to honor our request."

<p>"We have chosen to not air our commercial during Glenn Beck's program going forward given a number of alternatives that meet our advertising plan's criteria," said Mary Sestric, a corporate affairs staffer for Starkist Co., in an email to ColorOfChange.org.

<p>"Back in August of this year United Healthcare instructed FOX News to not run any of our ads during the Glenn Beck show," said Lynne High, director of media relations, in an email to ColorOfChange.org.

<p>"We are no longer advertising on this show or station," said Elizabeth Kirkpatrick, marketing coordinator for US Fidelis, in an email to ColorOfChange.org. "Thank you for bringing this to our attention."
</blockquote></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>Yesterday, for the fifth day in a row, the UK broadcast of Glenn Beck's TV show was forced to run without any advertisements. This is thanks to efforts by StopBeck.com to pressure companies advertising on Beck's UK broadcast. It's an amazing milestone in the larger effort to push advertisers away from Glenn Beck, which started last July. And at the same time, we've reached another important milestone -- over 100 companies have now stopped their ads from appearing on Beck's show. From our press release: The U.K. broadcast of Glenn Beck's eponymous television program was forced to air free of paid advertisements on four consecutive days last week. This according to StopBeck.com, an extension of the anti-Beck campaign created by ColorOfChange.org. StopBeck.com confirmed that, with the latest group of defections from Beck's overseas broadcast, Fox News Channel was forced to fill commercial breaks with news headlines and local weather updates...</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/02/becks-uk-broadcast-runs-without-ads-over-100-companies-have-ditched-beck.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>WATCH: Afro-Netizen founder Chris Rabb hosts LinkTV show, ColorLines: Race &amp; Economic Recovery (VIDEO)</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/lcAm6GvHBjg/watch-afronetizen-founder-chris-rabb-hosts-linktv-show-colorlines-race-economic-recovery-video.html</link><category>Arts &amp; Entertainment</category><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>Economy/Finance</category><category>Family</category><category>Labor/Employment</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Television</category><category>Youth/Children</category><category>Akonadi</category><category>Applied Research Center</category><category>Bill Clinton</category><category>Chris Rabb</category><category>commonwealth entrepreneurship</category><category>communal wealth-building</category><category>Demos</category><category>green economy</category><category>green jobs</category><category>Invisible Capital</category><category>LinkTV</category><category>living wage</category><category>poverty</category><category>racism</category><category>shared prosperity</category><category>social enterprise</category><category>social entrepreneurship</category><category>structural inequality</category><category>underclass</category><category>welfare reform</category><category>working poor</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:22:03 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef012877959c22970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a8930d51970b-pi" style="float: left;"><img alt="LinkTVColorlinesRrabb1" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a8930d51970b " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a8930d51970b-120wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;"></img></a> President Obama says the stimulus saved or created two million jobs
in 2009. But is the recovery really working? The American dream of good
jobs and strong communities is still just a dream for too many. The
unfair economy hurts certain groups more, and that ends up hurting
everyone. From the bottom line to the unemployment line to the color
line, watch a new in-depth program from Link TV and <a href="http://www.arc.org/" target="_blank">Applied Research Center (ARC)</a> for a closer look: <strong>ColorLines: Race and Economic Recovery.</strong></p><p><a href="http://colorlines.com/article.php?ID=681" target="_blank"><strong>ColorLines: Race and Economic Recovery</strong></a>
follows communities making ends meet in the Great Recession. The
program narrates the moving story of Tisha, mother of three in
Connecticut, facing a social safety net shredded further by the crisis.
Then the program goes to Los Angeles where community-based organization
SCOPE has mobilized to win green jobs for communities of color. Learn
more on <a href="http://colorlines.com/recovery" target="_blank">ARC's ColorLines page</a>.</p>

<p><font color="#000000"><strong><em>So, tune in to Link TV</em> Friday, February 12, for <em>ColorLines: Race and Economic Recovery</em></strong>
on DIRECTV Channel 375 or DISH Network Channel 9410 at 9:30 PM
Eastern/6:30 PM Pacific. <br></font></p>

<p><font color="#000000">The entire 28-minute show is also available online
<a href="http://www.linktv.org/justice" target="_blank" title="ColorLines: Race &amp; Economic Recovery">here</a>:</font></p>

<object height="370" width="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.linktv.org/embed/colorlines-race-and-economic-recovery/colorlines-race-and-economic-recovery20100210"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed height="370" src="http://www.linktv.org/embed/colorlines-race-and-economic-recovery/colorlines-race-and-economic-recovery20100210" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" wmode="transparent"></embed></object>

<br><p><font color="#000000">Afterwards, please <strong><em>join the roundtable discussion about what you've seen on Twitter </em></strong></font><strong><em><a href="http://twitter.com/racialjustice" target="_blank"><font color="#666600">@racialjustice</font></a>.</em></strong><a href="http://www.linktv.org/colorlines" target="_blank"><font color="#666600"></font></a></p>
<span style="font-style: italic;"></span><p></p>
<p></p><p><em>Major Funding for this program provided by the <a href="http://akonadi.org/section/view/about_us" target="_blank" title="About Akonadi">Akonadi Foundation</a>.</em></p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>President Obama says the stimulus saved or created two million jobs in 2009. But is the recovery really working? The American dream of good jobs and strong communities is still just a dream for too many. The unfair economy hurts certain groups more, and that ends up hurting everyone. From the bottom line to the unemployment line to the color line, watch a new in-depth program from Link TV and Applied Research Center (ARC) for a closer look: ColorLines: Race and Economic Recovery.

ColorLines: Race and Economic Recovery follows communities making ends meet in the Great Recession. The program narrates the moving story of Tisha, mother of three in Connecticut, facing a social safety net shredded further by the crisis. Then the program goes to Los Angeles where community-based organization SCOPE has mobilized to win green jobs for communities of color. Learn more on ARC's ColorLines page.

So, tune in to Link TV Friday, February 12, for ColorLines: Race and Economic Recovery on DIRECTV Channel 375 or DISH Network Channel 9410 at 9:30 PM Eastern/6:30 PM Pacific. 

Or watch it in full at: http://www.linktv.org/justice/</description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/BVZfV2MaLNU/colorlines-race-and-economic-recovery20100210" fileSize="27336" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>President Obama says the stimulus saved or created two million jobs in 2009. But is the recovery really working? The American dream of good jobs and strong communities is still just a dream for too many. The unfair economy hurts certain groups more, and t</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>President Obama says the stimulus saved or created two million jobs in 2009. But is the recovery really working? The American dream of good jobs and strong communities is still just a dream for too many. The unfair economy hurts certain groups more, and that ends up hurting everyone. From the bottom line to the unemployment line to the color line, watch a new in-depth program from Link TV and Applied Research Center (ARC) for a closer look: ColorLines: Race and Economic Recovery. ColorLines: Race and Economic Recovery follows communities making ends meet in the Great Recession. The program narrates the moving story of Tisha, mother of three in Connecticut, facing a social safety net shredded further by the crisis. Then the program goes to Los Angeles where community-based organization SCOPE has mobilized to win green jobs for communities of color. Learn more on ARC's ColorLines page. So, tune in to Link TV Friday, February 12, for ColorLines: Race and Economic Recovery on DIRECTV Channel 375 or DISH Network Channel 9410 at 9:30 PM Eastern/6:30 PM Pacific. Or watch it in full at: http://www.linktv.org/justice/</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/02/watch-afronetizen-founder-chris-rabb-hosts-linktv-show-colorlines-race-economic-recovery-video.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/BVZfV2MaLNU/colorlines-race-and-economic-recovery20100210" length="27336" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.linktv.org/embed/colorlines-race-and-economic-recovery/colorlines-race-and-economic-recovery20100210</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>"Push-polling" net neutrality</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/-cuLXzW4vh4/pushpolling-net-neutrality.html</link><category>Business &amp; Entrepreneurship</category><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>Media Reform</category><category>Media/Technology</category><category>Net Neutrality</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>AT&amp;T</category><category>CBC</category><category>Color of Change</category><category>ColorOfChange.org</category><category>Comcast</category><category>Congressional Black Caucus</category><category>digital divide</category><category>FCC</category><category>Internet</category><category>Internet freedom</category><category>Net Neutrality</category><category>netizens</category><category>social media</category><category>Technology News</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:10:00 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a887e609970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>By James Rucker</strong></p>

<p><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></p>

<p>A little over a week ago I <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-rucker/why-are-some-civil-rights_b_440926.html">delved into a troubling topic</a>: Why are so many <a href="http://colorofchange.org/docs/oct14letter.pdf">civil rights groups</a> and <a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/telcoletter.pdf">members of the Congressional Black Caucus</a> opposing net neutrality? It seemed strange to me that leaders in communities of color would be echoing discredited <a href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/att-asks-employees-to-oppose-net-neutrality.html">telecommunications industry talking points</a>.

</p>

<p>For those not familiar with the term "net neutrality," it describes the rules and practices that currently keep the Internet a free and open communication medium. Net neutrality guarantees that blogs, small businesses, and organizations are on a level playing field with the largest corporations. Whether you're GM or an individual, the content you put online is accessible and delivered in the same way, with the same priority, and nothing is blocked. <strong> For communities of color, net neutrality is key.</strong> It keeps barriers to Internet entrepreneurship low so that anyone with a good idea and some technical savvy can join the 21st century economy.

</p>

<p>Predictably, the major players in the broadband industry have been fighting the FCC's efforts to adopt rules that would solidify net neutrality principles into law, because scrapping net neutrality would enable them to make even more money by creating new revenue streams. Ironically, civil rights leaders and CBC members have joined the dominant players. Their stated reasoning: the belief that net neutrality rules could hurt efforts to close the digital divide. The problem is that, as far as I can see, the argument doesn't hold water. It falls apart whether you approach it from the perspective of business, common sense, or history. </p><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><span style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">"My hope in writing my first post was that it might encourage civil
rights leaders who have opposed or questioned net neutrality to
publicly explain their positions."</span></strong></span></span></div><p>My hope in writing my first post was that it might encourage civil rights leaders who have opposed or questioned net neutrality to publicly explain their positions. Given what's at stake, I think its incumbent on leaders opposing or questioning net neutrality to publicly make clear why. Unfortunately, none have done so. 

</p>

<p>While leadership remained silent, my post did elicit some responses, which follow the same pattern--uncritically echoing industry <a href="http://www.freepress.net/files/USIndustryInternetAssociation-email.pdf">talking points</a> while trying to change the subject from the arguments I put on the table. Take, for example, the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/navarrow-wright/civil-rights-groups-cbc-a_b_442628.html">open letter</a> posted by Navarrow Wright, a former television and Internet executive and current strategic consultant. I gather from Wright's resume that he is an accomplished and intelligent guy, but his criticism of my piece typifies the shoddy argumentation and confusing of issues from the loudest voices against net neutrality. While Wright failed to engage the arguments I put on the table, in the interest of public debate, I want to take on his assumptions one by one. 

</p>

<p>Wright opens:
</p><blockquote>
<span style="color: #0000bf;">... the civil rights groups fought hard to make sure the FCC developed the principles of net neutrality--this is nothing new, we've been living with net neutrality since 2004. Those principles made it possible for you to create Color of Change and for Senator Barack Obama to become President Obama. You should thank the people that helped make it all happen. Instead you question their sincerity. </span></blockquote>

<p>It's his first attempt to side-step the issues. The question isn't about whether the civil rights organizations in question were at one point instrumental in establishing our current net neutrality principles (a claim which I have yet to find any evidence to back up). The question is why these leaders are opposing the policy now, and it's one they should be able to answer. Over and over during the course of this debate, many of these leaders have acted as though it's disrespectful (or worse) to ask them for evidence to back up their claims about net neutrality. This appears to be a tactic designed to shut down any discussion of the actual issues at hand. 

</p>

<p>Wright continues by echoing the industry talking point, "We all know the fight today is between Google and the ISPs." While there are several powerful business interests at play, it has no bearing on my concerns or arguments. The broadband industry would love to portray the fight over net neutrality as one between themselves and Google, but my support for net neutrality reflects the views of thousands of independent filmmakers and musicians, community organizers and activists, and Internet entrepreneurs struggling to harness the power of the Internet to launch new products. And while we look at who's talking, I think it's important to look at the relationships in play. My organization hasn't taken a dime from Google or any other corporation with a key interest in either side of the debate. Many of the organizations most vocally opposing net neutrality <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/10/the-anti-net-neutrality-movement-is-it-just-about-att-money.ars">would have difficulty saying the same</a>.

</p>

<p>Wright continues:
</p><blockquote><p><span style="color: #0000bf;"><span style="color: #0000bf;">Don't you think the FCC should answer the questions raised by the civil rights leaders and CBC? Why is it wrong to ask the FCC to make sure the rules they are proposing will not widen the digital divide? Why is it wrong to ask the FCC to make sure the rules they develop will not lead to regressive pricing which would shackle poor people? Why is it wrong to ask that the costs be borne by the people that cause them and not by the under-served? Why are you so afraid of the answers to these questions? </span></span></p>

</blockquote><p><span style="font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial;"></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: 13px;">Throughout his piece he asserts that the civil rights groups are only “asking questions" that we “shouldn’t be afraid to answer.” After reading it a couple of times, I realized where I had seen this technique before: Wright’s piece -- and the broader arguments he seeks to defend -- are the rhetorical equivalent of a push poll. <br></span></span></span></p><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: 13px;">
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">"Push polls are a well known and highly effective <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/3127353/Barack-Obama-victim-of-Hamas-push-poll-smears.html">political trick</a>. They ask questions that insert into the public consciousness a false idea, positioning a baseless assumption as plausible."</span></strong></span><span style="font-size: 14px;">
</span><span style="font-size: 14px;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;"></span></strong></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br></span></span></span></span></p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: 14px;">Push polls</span><span style="font-size: 14px;"> are a well known and highly effective political trick</span><span style="color: #000000; font-size: 18px;"><span style="font-size: 14px;">. They ask questions that insert into</span> </span>the public consciousness a false idea, positioning a baseless assumption as plausible. Navarrow Wright, and the civil rights organizations he is defending, are effectively “push-polling” net neutrality. They are asking the question, “If you knew that net neutrality would widen the digital divide, would you support it?” The question is asked </span><span style="color: #000000;">without any evidence to suggest that the premise of the question is true, but the question itself alters the frame of the debate. The effect has been real--FCC commissioners who know the truth about net neutrality are being held hostage by </span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LTcmc-QQPI">debunked theories</a><span style="color: #000000;">, as they don’t want to be perceived as embracing policy that could hurt minority communities.

</span></span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #000000;">
<p>Finally, Wright suggests that the FCC has a bad record on issues of concern to communities of color:

</p><blockquote><span style="color: #0000bf;">Maybe you don't quite grasp why minority leadership is vexed. Perhaps you're too young to understand why many of our elders, who've given their lives and wear the scars of the struggle, feel the need to seek the truth. You might not understand why they don't trust the FCC to get it right. Understandable mistakes if this is your first foray into media and communications issues...but there is a long history behind their deep skepticism and it makes sense that they would question the FCC on its intended course of action. </span></blockquote>

<p>Putting aside the personal attack against me, if you follow Wright's reasoning then we should obstruct the ability of the US Congress to make laws even when they're in the interest of our communities, as is the case with net neutrality. For example, in 1964 Congress had a very poor record of protecting the interests of communities of color. Would he have then questioned whether we could trust Congress to pass the Voting Rights Act? 

</p>

<p>Let me restate what I keep hearing from net neutrality’s detractors. The reasoning seems to be that if we give broadband providers the legal authority to discriminate on content, which will allow them to increase their profits, they will suddenly become benevolent and invest in expanding their networks or lower broadband prices. The reasoning is just not borne out by reality. These companies are earning as much as 80 percent profit margins on their broadband services; despite this, they haven't--except when forced--made broadband more affordable for poorer communities in any systematic way that would spur adoption. Worse, it was just reported that <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123409454&amp;ft=1&amp;f=1001">major broadband companies are actively attempting to block broadband expansion and adoption plans</a> by smaller players when it presents competition for them.

</p>

<p>I'd still like to hear a response from those groups that say they represent the interests of communities of color, but are in line with the broadband providers. If there's a credible argument to be made against network neutrality, I'd like to hear it and engage it. I've put my arguments out there, and I've addressed the opposing arguments. Now I hope other civil rights leaders will join the conversation.
</p></span></span></div>]]></content:encoded><description>James Rucker:

A little over a week ago I delved into a troubling topic: Why are so many civil rights groups and members of the Congressional Black Caucus opposing net neutrality? It seemed strange to me that leaders in communities of color would be echoing discredited telecommunications industry talking points.

For those not familiar with the term "net neutrality," it describes the rules and practices that currently keep the Internet a free and open communication medium. Net neutrality guarantees that blogs, small businesses, and organizations are on a level playing field with the largest corporations. Whether you're GM or an individual, the content you put online is accessible and delivered in the same way, with the same priority, and nothing is blocked. For communities of color, net neutrality is key. It keeps barriers to Internet entrepreneurship low so that anyone with a good idea and some technical savvy can join the 21st century economy.</description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/VHELEsdp-7o/oct14letter.pdf" fileSize="251701" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>James Rucker: A little over a week ago I delved into a troubling topic: Why are so many civil rights groups and members of the Congressional Black Caucus opposing net neutrality? It seemed strange to me that leaders in communities of color would be echoin</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>James Rucker: A little over a week ago I delved into a troubling topic: Why are so many civil rights groups and members of the Congressional Black Caucus opposing net neutrality? It seemed strange to me that leaders in communities of color would be echoing discredited telecommunications industry talking points. For those not familiar with the term "net neutrality," it describes the rules and practices that currently keep the Internet a free and open communication medium. Net neutrality guarantees that blogs, small businesses, and organizations are on a level playing field with the largest corporations. Whether you're GM or an individual, the content you put online is accessible and delivered in the same way, with the same priority, and nothing is blocked. For communities of color, net neutrality is key. It keeps barriers to Internet entrepreneurship low so that anyone with a good idea and some technical savvy can join the 21st century economy.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/02/pushpolling-net-neutrality.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/VHELEsdp-7o/oct14letter.pdf" length="251701" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://colorofchange.org/docs/oct14letter.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>What Would Jesus Do? Uganda, White Supremacy and Right-Wing Evangelical Blood Money</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/zScEHBLpvVY/what-would-jesus-do-uganda-white-supremacy-and-rightwing-evangelical-blood-money.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Crime &amp; Punishment</category><category>Elections/Campaigns/Voting</category><category>Gender</category><category>International Affairs</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Religion</category><category>Anti-gay</category><category>conservatives</category><category>evangelical</category><category>heterosexism</category><category>homophobia</category><category>missionary</category><category>religion</category><category>right-wing</category><category>Scaife</category><category>violence</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:38:27 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a876661e970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<strong>By <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Sikivu+Hutchinson%22+Afro-Netizen&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a" target="_blank" title="Google search: &quot;Sikivu Hutchinson&quot; Afro-Netizen">Sikivu Hutchinson</a></strong><p><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></p><p>White evangelicals have taken their corrupt “traditional family values” racket to Africa and hit paydirt.  </p><p>Over the past several months, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uganda_Anti-Homosexuality_Bill" target="_blank" title="Uganda’s terrorist anti-Homosexual bill">Uganda’s terrorist anti-homosexual bill</a> has been exposed as not just a symbol of African homophobia but a symptom of American evangelical influence-peddling.   While the legal battle over same sex marriage has reached epic proportions in the United States, American evangelicals have been quietly wielding “moral” influence over African public policy, spearheading a rabid call for retribution against gays and lesbians in their missionary pilgrimages.  </p><p>During a March 2009 trip to Uganda, evangelical activists Scott Lively and Don Schmierer warned Ugandan leaders of a gay agenda to “take over the world.” Lively and Schmierer have been roundly condemned by human rights and social justice organizations for galvanizing Ugandan politicians to develop the legislation.    </p><p>As has been well-documented, the Ugandan legislation would “seek to protect the traditional family by prohibiting any form of sexual relations between persons of the same sex.” It would also bar “the promotion or recognition of such sexual relations in public institutions and other places through or with the support of any Government entity in Uganda or any non-governmental organization inside or outside the country.”  </p><p>The Bill envisions a vast homosexual conspiracy of “sexual activists” seeking to convert youth and adopt children.  It would require those knowing of homosexual acts to report them or risk prosecution, and, as a result, seriously jeopardize the country's inroads in HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment.</p>The United States and other donor countries have denounced the Bill.  Facing the possible loss of international aid, the Ugandan government is considering revising an earlier provision which would have required the execution of known homosexuals.<br><p>After a firestorm of criticism, the evangelicals have also tried to distance themselves from the flap.  However, the Ugandan Bill is part of a larger movement of evangelical puppeteering.  The bill exploits anti-gay sentiment and anxieties within African culture about a family structure under siege by “outside” forces, evoking some of the same tensions that African American communities experienced around California's Proposition 8.  </p><p>Fittingly, the Bill has been bankrolled by conservative foundations and promoted by the far right Christian activist group the Family, a covert network of influential politicians and power brokers.  The Family hosts this week's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fellowship_(Christian_organization)" target="_blank" title="National Prayer Breakfast">National Prayer Breakfast</a> in Washington, D.C., an annual gathering for power brokers from the international community.</p>Stoking anti-gay sentiment through biblical edict and propaganda about potential homosexual corruption of the African family, evangelicals have used Africa as a springboard for a virulently homophobic agenda that has been intensified by the struggle over gay equal rights in the United States.  At the forefront of this movement is President Obama's buddy Rick Warren.  Warren's purpose-driven crew is hugely influential in Africa, funding schools, missions and HIV/AIDS treatment while brokering homophobia.<br><p>Warren and his American counterparts have identified Africa as the new frontier and future of evangelicalism.  And as such, Africa is fertile ground for the export of hate and right wing evangelical terrorism.  Indeed, evangelicals’ hold on Africa is merely an extension of white supremacist control over African self-determination.  </p><p>The colonial legacy of African exploitation by the West, exemplified by the undue cultural and economic influence of Western missionaries, has played a pernicious role in the African psyche.  To the extent that African nations have been so besieged by Western influence, their embrace of American-bred homophobia, in exchange for American largesse, is simply part of the package of white capitalist patronage. </p><p>For this reason, it is inconceivable that African evangelicals would have the same impact on public policy in the West.  In a sweeping expose, the progressive think tank <a href="http://www.publiceye.org/portal/top-domtheo-page.html" target="_blank" title="Public Eye: Young Evangelicals">Political Research Associates</a> reports that American evangelicals have long been active in promoting anti-gay public policy through their missionary work in Africa.  Because “the demographic center of Christianity is shifting from the global North to the global South,” Africa’s influence on the global direction of Christianity has increased.  </p><p>According to the report, one of the architects of this movement is the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Institute_on_Religion_and_Democracy" target="_blank" title="SourceWatch: IRD">Institute for Religion and Democracy</a> (IRD).  IRD is a neo-conservative think tank which has exploited the widespread belief that homosexuality is a western phenomenon that undermines essential African culture values.  Scratch the surface and IRD is a radical political organization that has actively opposed the social justice campaigns of mainline Protestant churches and pro-democracy movements in Central America and Africa.  </p><p>Supported by ultraconservative foundations such as the Scaife and Bradley Foundations, the organization is part of a well-financed network of think tanks and nonprofits, many with tax exempt status granted to religious entities.</p>The staggering amounts funneled into these organizations dwarfs foundation grants and funding to progressive advocacy organizations.  As a result, conservative organizations are better equipped to position themselves as lobbyists and power brokers in both the global and domestic legislative arena.<br><p>The intersection of dire poverty, underdevelopment and social desperation has historically made African countries vulnerable to the moral profiteering of a bankrupt evangelical movement.  Make no mistake, American evangelicals, in their advancement of a terrorist agenda that seeks extermination based on sexuality, will most certainly have blood on their hands.  </p><p>Far from being an isolated act of extremism, Uganda's shadow evangelical legislature is yet another potent reminder of the global destruction that the Christian right wreaks in the name of Western enlightenment.  As the anonymous author of the blog <a href="http://gayuganda.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" title="GayUganda.Blogspot.com">Gay Uganda</a> says, “I am immersed in the middle of a battle for my life. My very life, me and my partner’s. And of all Ugandans that are like me.”</p>   <br><br><em><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Sikivu+Hutchinson%22+Afro-Netizen&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a" target="_blank" title="Google search: &quot;Sikivu Hutchinson&quot; Afro-Netizen">Sikivu Hutchinson</a> is the editor of <a href="http://www.BlackFemLens.org" target="_blank" title="BlackFemLens.org">BlackFemLens.org</a> and the author of the forthcoming book Moral Combat: Black Atheists, Gender Politics and Secular America.<br></em>]]></content:encoded><description>White evangelicals have taken their corrupt “traditional family values” racket to Africa and hit paydirt. 

Over the past several months, Uganda’s terrorist anti-Homosexual Bill has been exposed as not just a symbol of African homophobia but a symptom of American evangelical influence-peddling.   While the legal battle over same sex marriage has reached epic proportions in the United States, American evangelicals have been quietly wielding “moral” influence over African public policy, spearheading a rabid call for retribution against gays and lesbians in their missionary pilgrimages. </description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/02/what-would-jesus-do-uganda-white-supremacy-and-rightwing-evangelical-blood-money.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Watch: President Obama reaffirms his administration's strong support for Internet freedom aka "net neutrality" (VIDEO)</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/7g2SypQ57cw/watch-president-obama-reaffirms-his-administrations-strong-support-for-internet-freedom-aka-net-neut.html</link><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>Interviews</category><category>Media/Technology</category><category>Net Neutrality</category><category>ObamaWatch</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>digital divide</category><category>digital segregation</category><category>internet freedom</category><category>net neutrality</category><category>network neutrality</category><category>non-discrimination</category><category>open internet</category><category>splinternet</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:20:00 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0128775ea680970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mP01t0Z4Hr8&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mP01t0Z4Hr8&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>Watch President Obama strong reaffirm his commitment to Internet freedom aka "net neutrality". Bravo!</description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/MvTlknLvZe8/mP01t0Z4Hr8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" fileSize="1038" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Watch President Obama strong reaffirm his commitment to Internet freedom aka "net neutrality". Bravo!</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Watch President Obama strong reaffirm his commitment to Internet freedom aka "net neutrality". Bravo!</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/02/watch-president-obama-reaffirms-his-administrations-strong-support-for-internet-freedom-aka-net-neut.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/MvTlknLvZe8/mP01t0Z4Hr8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" length="1038" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.youtube.com/v/mP01t0Z4Hr8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>Mainstream Media’s Tea Party Tryst</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/ZjxsXO64xnE/mainstream-medias-tea-party-tryst.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Elections/Campaigns/Voting</category><category>Media/Technology</category><category>Politics</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>corporate media</category><category>politcs</category><category>Scott Brown</category><category>Sikivu Hutchinson</category><category>Tea Baggers</category><category>Tea Party</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:01:58 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0128773ff848970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<strong>By Sikivu Hutchinson<br></strong><p><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></p><p>Its déjà vu all over again as the mainstream media trumpet the ascent of the so-called tea party movement.  In its rush to frame the recent victory of Republican State Senator Scott Brown in the Massachusetts Senate race as a tea party triumph mainstream media have given more ammo to the politics of racial hysteria.  Last fall’s health care reform inspired outburst of anti-Obama anti-government hysteria officially inaugurated a return to the in-your-face “populism” of angry white men.  </p><p>Thinly disguised as saber-rattling against big government, race-baiting propaganda has been revitalized as the Republican strategy for taking back the country.  A bolded asterisk should be stamped on these tired broadsides, as big government never includes defense, domestic law enforcement, prisons, functioning stoplights or pothole free roads for ozone shredding SUVs.</p><p>Instead of critiquing the real roots of these spasms of white supremacist “reclamation,” mainstream and even some liberal-progressive media have largely parroted the view that there was some new and unprecedented backlash in Massachusetts.  Head scratching pundits counsel Democrats to “listen” to the sentiments of the tea baggers and stop parodying them as ignorant philistines.  Yet Massachusetts state Attorney General Martha Coakley was simply a weak candidate.  </p><p>Like most Democrats she took the support of black and Latino constituencies for granted and failed to do the campaign trench work required to win election.  Kowtowing or trying to “understand” the motives of a narrow segment of the Massachusetts electorate simply legitimizes a long strain of American politics that dates all the way back to Strom Thurmond's twenty-four hour filibuster against the 1957 Civil Rights Bill.</p><p>If a really dumb space alien landed in the middle of a tea party protest it wouldn't need a decoder ring to tell them what the demographic “411” is when it comes to power and privilege in the United States.  Before Massachusetts, so-called disaffected white independents were only one slimy teabag away from their “birther” brethren.  In the 2008 campaign </p><p>Obama won a mere 43% of the white vote, greater than either Gore in 2000 or Kerry in 2004, but miniscule when considering the carnage left by the Bush administration.  As historians have noted, the Democrat Party has never recovered from the mass exodus of whites after the passage of the 1964 Civil and 1965 Voting Rights Acts.  Hence the post-racialism which conservatives tout as an outcome of Obama’s election has simply never been borne out in the numbers.   </p>On the black side of Flat Earth, black conservatives valiantly uphold this dramatic tradition of casting the universe as one giant self-reflection.  Recently, in commemoration of Martin Luther King's birthday, African American commentators were trotted out on MSNBC and NPR to assess the nation's racial climate.  Questioned by MSNBC’s Chris Matthews during a race roundtable John McWhorter, a pundit at the conservative Manhattan Institute, proclaimed his love of segregation, noting that it's a good thing—Cleveland, Philadelphia, D.C., Detroit, Milwaukee, Baltimore and South Los Angeles aside—when black people live together.  On NPR conservative watchdog Joe Hicks swaggeringly boasted that he could go anywhere in the country without fear of legal barrier, reminding the listening audience that King probably would have opposed affirmative action had he been alive today.  <br><p>Like their white counterparts, black conservatives hew faithfully to Ronald Reagan’s old caveat that facts are “stupid things.”  On the phenomenon of lending discrimination against homebuyers and homeowners of color they can't be bothered to read decades of research documenting the institutional basis for segregation.  </p><p>On the issue of African American over-incarceration they point to black matriarchs like the fictitious Mary Johnson of the film Precious and baggy pants wearing young black males.  Over-incarceration is merely a symptom of poor blacks' refusal to assimilate. Similarly, the fact that blacks and Latinos are more likely to live in areas that are environmentally toxic, with little access to healthy shopping alternatives is really just evidence of their failure to learn how to say “ask” instead of “axe” in order to take advantage of all the higher paying private sector jobs that would spring them from the ghetto.</p>The conservative tradition of cultural and historical illiteracy is now a permanent and defining part of the political landscape.  Due to its influence the general tenor of the country is proudly unabashedly hostile to evidence and documentation.  Global warming is a liberal conspiracy.  Evolution is cultural propaganda and any research-based evidence is deeply suspect.  The Supreme Court's recent ruling giving corporations free reign to influence peddle and steal elections have liberated them from “second class citizenship.” <br><p> The Fox regime’s scant coverage on Haiti, coupled with “Boss” Limbaugh’s reduction of the nation’s mammoth death toll, destruction and human suffering to a money pit exacerbated by too much global welfare, is bolstered by the witch-hunting moral authority of Pat Robertson.  The media’s new love affair with the tea party phenomenon is entirely in service to a racist narrative in which capitalism and imperialism are endangered and the white electorate is the underdog minority.  In the hype of the old its 1995 all over again, and the militia are massing at the gate.</p><br><em>Sikivu Hutchinson is the editor of <a href="http://">BlackFemLens.org</a> and the author of the forthcoming book <strong>Moral Combat: Black Atheism, Gender Politics and Secular America</strong>.</em><br><br><br><br><br>]]></content:encoded><description>Its déjà vu all over again as the mainstream media trumpet the ascent of the so-called tea party movement.  In its rush to frame the recent victory of Republican State Senator Scott Brown in the Massachusetts Senate race as a tea party triumph mainstream media have given more ammo to the politics of racial hysteria.  Last fall’s health care reform inspired outburst of anti-Obama an</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/02/mainstream-medias-tea-party-tryst.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>WATCH: President Obama's Speech at the House Republican retreat in Baltimore (VIDEO)</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/B6rXOVAEI-M/watch-president-obamas-speech-at-the-house-republican-retreat-in-baltimore-video.html</link><category>ObamaWatch</category><category>Politics</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Television</category><category>civility</category><category>Congress</category><category>democracy</category><category>gridlock</category><category>legislation</category><category>Obama</category><category>partisanship</category><category>recession</category><category>recovery</category><category>transparency</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:18:42 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a85c0465970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zvwEjxDtwWs&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zvwEjxDtwWs&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425"></embed></object>

<p>For news stories on President Obama's exchange with House Republicans, <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=GOP+retreat+Obama+Baltimore&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a" target="_blank" title="Google News search: Obama GOP retreat Baltimore">click here</a>.
</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Watch President Obama completely dominate the GOP retreat in Baltimore two days after delivering his first State of the Union address.</description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/37Hv9_oLAAo/zvwEjxDtwWs&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" fileSize="1076" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Watch President Obama completely dominate the GOP retreat in Baltimore two days after delivering his first State of the Union address.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Watch President Obama completely dominate the GOP retreat in Baltimore two days after delivering his first State of the Union address.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/01/watch-president-obamas-speech-at-the-house-republican-retreat-in-baltimore-video.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/37Hv9_oLAAo/zvwEjxDtwWs&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" length="1076" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.youtube.com/v/zvwEjxDtwWs&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>Obama's Proposed "Small Business" Initiative Lacks Audacity (and Focus)</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/BHBERbWZAJM/obamas-proposed-small-business-initiative-lacks-audacity-and-focus.html</link><category>Business &amp; Entrepreneurship</category><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Labor/Employment</category><category>ObamaWatch</category><category>Politics</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Banks</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>CDFI</category><category>Census</category><category>Community Banks</category><category>Donald Trump</category><category>Economic Recovery</category><category>Economic Stimulus</category><category>Entrepreneurship</category><category>Innovation</category><category>Living Wage</category><category>microenterprise</category><category>Obama</category><category>rich dad</category><category>Robert Kiyosaki</category><category>Small Business</category><category>SOTU</category><category>Sustainability</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:26:18 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef01287726e5b3970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>By Chris Rabb</strong></p>

<p><strong>Originally published on <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-rabb/obamas-proposed-small-bus_b_441329.html" target="_blank" title="HuffPo: Obama's Proposed &quot;Small Business&quot; Initiative Lacks Audacity (and Focus)">The Huffington Post</a></strong></p>

<p>You wouldn't have guessed it from listening to President Obama's State of the Union <a href="http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/01/video-audio-and-text-versions-of-president-barack-obamas-first-state-of-the-union-address.html" target="_hplink">address</a>, but small and/or new businesses aren't really the types of enterprises that need our recirculated stimulus money the most.</p>

<p>Mature businesses do.</p>

<p>Specifically, established businesses that cannot otherwise afford to hire new workers at a living wage -- particularly in America's most distressed communities.</p>

<p>Most people don't realize this, but 99% of American businesses are "small businesses". That is, only one in 100 business employs 500 or more workers, which is how the <a href="http://www.sba.gov/aboutsba/index.html" target="_hplink">Small Business Administration</a> (SBA) generally defines this term so often bandied about by politicians on both sides of the political spectrum.</p>

<p>So, it's reasonable to ask ourselves: If 99 of every 100 firms in America are small, what value does the term "small business" really have? Not much, actually.</p>



<p> The reality is, the value of the term of art "small business" is only political in nature; "smallness" suggests local, Mom-n-Pop, salt-of-the-earth, when in fact the one million small businesses President Obama proposed to help out in his address through a $30 billion investment of tax-payer money are not really representative of most small or new ventures.</p><p><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0128773c47ca970c-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="FirmSizeByEmp2004" border="0" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0128773c47ca970c image-full " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0128773c47ca970c-800wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px; width: 355px; height: 207px;" title="FirmSizeByEmp2004"></img></a> In fact, <strong>three out of every four businesses have no employees at all!</strong> So, the vast majority of the businesses in our nation have <em>zero</em> employees with very little likelihood of ever hiring one. Perhaps that's why the average business size boasts a mere <strong>five employees</strong>.</p>

<p>The one million businesses Obama proposed assisting obtain bank loans to stay afloat are likely the same approximately one million firms that represent for-profit enterprises with <strong>ten or more employees</strong> on their payroll.</p>

<p>In his address, President Obama stated that "[w]e should start where most new jobs do -- in small businesses, companies that begin when . . . an entrepreneur takes a chance on a dream, or a worker decides it's time she became her own boss." But these types of start-ups represent the riskiest firms to invest in, particularly if the primary goal of this investment is net job growth beyond the short-term.</p>

<p>For a president who urged members of Congress to take a "common sense" approach to legislative action, the president's framing of entrepreneurship and micro-enterprise as generators of new jobs embraced <em>common myth</em> along the lines of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horatio_Alger,_Jr." target="_hplink">Horatio Alger</a> versus the bold pragmatism of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FDR" target="_hplink">FDR</a>.</p>

<p>"Common sense" would be to invest in sustainable enterprises that create living wage jobs whose additions to the work force would produce a clear <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiscal_multiplier" target="_hplink">multiplier effect</a> on our economy. In this more targeted approach, reinvestment of tax-payer dollars into such enterprises (that could include certain social service non-profits), new employment could be expedited that would not otherwise occur. Unfortunately, this is not what President Obama has proposed.</p>

<p>According to the Census' recent <a href="http://www.ces.census.gov/index.php/bds" target="_hplink">Business Dynamics Statistics</a> data, the type of firms historically most likely to create net jobs are firms that have lasted over 25 years in business. Many new and large-scale businesses, respectively, traditionally create jobs, but lay off even more in the short-term. But President Obama probably didn't know this because his top advisors either didn't know this or, worse, felt this was politically irrelevant information.</p>

<p>Instead, the president resorted to reading from the chapter of the dog-eared political playbook written by what I dub the "Entrepreneurial Industrial Complex" and regurgitated the hackneyed "bootstrapping pioneer" rhetoric without nuance or reference to the very studies produced by his own federal agencies that suggest other more productive courses of action.</p>

<p>The diverse array of people who make up the Entrepreneurial Industrial Complex have insinuated themselves into otherwise well-meaning public policy discussions on how best to support entrepreneurs and other business owners flourish for the benefit our their local communities and the national economy.</p>

<p>This cohort consists of "pro-business" politicians, slick business evangelists like Donald Trump and Robert Kiyosaki (of <a href="http://www.johntreed.com/Kiyosaki.html" target="_hplink"><em>Rich Dad, Poor Dad</em> infamy</a>), mainstream media figures, lobbyists and many fellows that abound within Beltway think-tanks, conservative and liberal alike who run from facts, <a href="http://www.kauffman.org/Section.aspx?id=Research_And_Policy" target="_hplink">substantive research</a> and critical thought like the plague.</p>

<p>Based on 2004 data from the U.S. Census Bureau, there's about a one percent chance of a new start-up venture eventually employing 10 or more workers and surviving five years in business -- let alone becoming profitable. Of course, this probability assumes that the playing field is level and that social and economic disparities between entrepreneurs do not exist or are no longer relevant to viability in business. Sadly, the era of perfect equality of opportunity has not yet been ushered in. (Perhaps that's something Obama can work on if he's re-elected.)</p>

<p>Until that time, though, we must acknowledge and address the range of little discussed factors that impact even modest success in business in terms of revenues, employment, longevity and profitability. Such narrowly defined business outcomes are most influenced by what I call "invisible capital", all of those often intangible assets an entrepreneur needs when a great idea, a good attitude and hard work are not enough to survive or thrive in these tumultuous times.</p>

<p>No doubt, American entrepreneurs and new business ventures need our help more than ever, and the Commerce Department's brand new <a href="http://www.commerce.gov/NewsRoom/PressReleases_FactSheets/PROD01_008444" target="_hplink">Office of Innovation and Entrepreneurship</a> is an excellent step in the right direction. However, if the president's goal is to create good jobs in a timely fashion -- jobs that will last because the firms in which they are created are the most viable of the roughly 26 million businesses in operation today -- then this proposal will simply not work.</p>

<p>The good news is that President Obama can still summon the audacity to craft initiatives that provide incentives for the most sustainable enterprises to create living wage jobs in partnership with the <a href="http://www.cdfifund.gov/who_we_are/about_us.asp" target="_hplink">Community Development Financial Institutions Fund</a> (CDFIs). The CDFI Fund's mission is to "expand the capacity of financial institutions to provide credit, capital, and financial services to under-served populations and communities".</p>

<p>By targeting those businesses that add to our economy's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtuous_circle_and_vicious_circle" target="_hplink">virtuous cycle</a> through strong, already established federal programs, Obama can preside over a broadly felt economic recovery that's based on more than just hope and Beltway clichés.</p>

<p></p>

<p><em>Chris Rabb is a fellow at <a href="http://www.demos.org/people.cfm?currentpersonnelid=4751A3DE-3FF4-6C82-5D12B98BC0319FA0" target="_blank" title="Demos: Chris Rabb, Fellow">Demos</a> and a visiting researcher at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University. He is the author of the forthcoming book, </em>Invisible Capital: How Unseen Forces Shape Entrepreneurial Opportunity to be published by Berrett-Koehler Publishers in Fall 2010.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>You wouldn't have guessed it from listening to President Obama's State of the Union address, but small and/or new businesses aren't really the types of enterprises that need our recirculated stimulus money the most.

Mature businesses do.

Specifically, established businesses that cannot otherwise afford to hire new workers at a living wage -- particularly in America's most distressed communities.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/01/obamas-proposed-small-business-initiative-lacks-audacity-and-focus.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Why Are Some Civil Rights Groups &amp; Leaders on the Wrong Side of Net Neutrality?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/ZjJk9019W4A/why-are-some-civil-rights-groups-leaders-on-the-wrong-side-of-net-neutrality.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>Media Reform</category><category>Media/Technology</category><category>Net Neutrality</category><category>Politics</category><category>Web/Tech</category><category>CBC</category><category>Color of Change</category><category>ColorOfChange.org</category><category>FCC</category><category>Internet</category><category>Net Neutrality</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:16:33 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef01287721f94f970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>By James Rucker</strong></p><p><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></p><p>It’s said that politics creates strange bedfellows. I was reminded how true this can be when I traveled to D.C. in recent weeks to figure out why several advocacy groups and legislators with histories of advocating for minority interests are lining up with big telecom companies in opposition to the FCC’s efforts to pass “Net Neutrality” rules.

</p><p>Net Neutrality is the principle that prevents Internet Service Providers from controlling what kind of content or applications you can access online. It sounds wonky, but for Black and other communities, an open Internet offers a transformative opportunity to truly control our own voice and image, while reaching the largest number of people possible. This dynamic is one major reason why Barack Obama was elected president and why organizations like ColorOfChange.org exist.

</p><p>So I was troubled to learn that several Congressional Black Caucus members were among 72 Democrats to write the FCC last fall questioning the need for Net Neutrality rules. I was further troubled that a number of our nation’s leading civil rights groups <a href="http://colorofchange.org/docs/oct14letter.pdf" target="_blank">had also taken positions</a> questioning or against Net Neutrality, using arguments that were in step with those of the big phone and cable companies like AT&amp;T and Comcast, which are determined to water down any new FCC rules.

</p><p>Most unsettling about their position is the argument that maintaining Net Neutrality could <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/outlook/6814399.html" target="_blank">widen the digital divide</a>.

</p><p>First, let’s be clear: the problem of the broadband digital divide is real. Already, getting a job, accessing services, managing one’s medical care—just to mention a few examples—are all facilitated online. Those who aren’t connected face a huge disadvantage in so many aspects of our society<span style="font-family: Arial;">. </span><span style="font-family: Arial;">Broadband access is a big problem -- but that doesn't mean it has anything to do with Net Neutrality.</span>
</p><div>

<p>Yet some in the civil rights community will tell you differently. They claim that if broadband providers can earn greater profits by charging content providers for access to the Internet “fast lane,” then they will lower prices to underserved areas. In other words, if Comcast — which already earns 80 percent profit margins on its broadband services — can increase its profits under a system without Net Neutrality, then they’ll all of a sudden invest in our communities. You don’t have to be a historian or economist to know that this type of trickle-down economics never works and has always failed communities of color.

</p></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>

<p>Whether the phone and cable companies can make more money by acting as toll-takers on the Internet has nothing to do with whether they will invest in increased deployment of broadband. If these companies think investing in low-income communities makes good business sense, they will make the investment. Benevolence doesn’t factor into the equation.

</p></div>
<p>On my trips to Washington, I met with some of the groups and congressional offices questioning or opposing Net Neutrality. I asked them what evidence they had to back up claims that undermining Net Neutrality would lead to an expansion of broadband to under-served communities, or that preserving Net Neutrality would thwart expansion. Not one could answer my question. Some CBC members hadn’t yet been presented with a counter to the industry’s arguments; others told stories about pressure from telecom companies or from other members of congress. As one CBC staffer told me, many CBC members have willingly supported the business agenda of telecom companies because the industry can be counted on to make campaign contributions, and they face no political backlash.

</p><p>I also heard from people who don’t consider themselves against Net Neutrality, but who say their issue is prioritizing broadband expansion over maintaining Net Neutrality—as if the two have some intrinsic competitive relationship. When I’ve asked about the relationship, again, no one could provide anything concrete.
</p><div>

<p>To those taking positions against Net Neutrality, I ask what sense it makes to undermine the very power of the Internet, especially for our communities, in order to provide access to everyone, presuming for a second the two were even connected. It’s like what we have with cable — our communities are saturated with programming that they cannot control, with no benefit of empowerment for anyone. Again, no one with whom I talked had an answer to this point.

</p><p>Thankfully, there are an array of grassroots, media and social justice organizations that have not followed this line of reasoning and are actively supporting Network Neutrality, such as the <a href="http://centerformediajustice.org/2009/10/29/net-neutrality/" target="_blank">Center for Media Justice</a> and the <a href="http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7020374786" target="_blank">Applied Research Center</a>. Black and brown journalists and media groups who understand the need for unconstrained expression on the part of our communities are on the same page as well: the <a href="http://www.nahj.org/2009/10/nahj-supports-network-neutrality/" target="_blank">National Association of Hispanic Journalists</a>, <a href="http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7020371203" target="_blank">UNITY: Journalists of Color</a>, the National Association of Latino Independent<a href="http:///?ui=2&amp;view=bsp&amp;ver=1qygpcgurkovy#12676ba8cb9a0428_12676b4e91fc27fb__msocom_1" name="12676cadf75cffd0_12676becd688cdf2_12676ba8cb9a0428_12676b4e91fc27fb__msoanchor_1" target="_blank"></a> Producers, the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/newsmediaworkshop/544505-00032.pdf" target="_blank">National Association of Black Journalists</a>, and the <a href="http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7020375488" target="_blank">National Hispanic Media Coalition</a> have all been vocal supporters of Net Neutrality.

</p><p>Prominent lawmakers, including CBC members Reps. <a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/news/050808.html" target="_blank">John Conyers</a>, <a href="http://colorofchange.org/docs/waters.pdf" target="_blank">Maxine Waters</a>, and <a href="http://donnaedwards.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=24&amp;parentid=23&amp;sectiontree=23,24&amp;itemid=213" target="_blank">Donna Edwards</a> are vocal supporters, as are House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/277425-Obama_Committed_to_Network_Neutrality.php" target="_blank">President Obama</a> — who has pledged to “take a back seat to no one” on the issue. And last week, Mignon Clyburn, a commissioner at the FCC, <a href="http://colorofchange.org/docs/clyburn.html" target="_blank">called out advocacy groups</a> entrusted by many to represent our communities, for making half-baked arguments that completely miss the boat on the importance of Net Neutrality to our communities.

</p><p>As Clyburn pointed out, far from being just a concern of the digital elite, Net Neutrality is essential to what makes the Internet a place where people of color and marginalized communities can speak for ourselves without first asking for permission from gatekeepers, and where small blogs, businesses, and organizations operate on a level playing field with the largest corporations. Net Neutrality regulations are needed to protect the status quo, because the telecom industry sees an opportunity for profit in fundamentally altering this basic aspect of the Internet.

</p></div>
</div>
</div>
<p>In the coming weeks I plan to head back to DC to continue to fight for Net Neutrality. I’m hoping that on my next trip some of the anti-Net Neutrality civil rights groups or CBC members will heed my call and explain their position. I would like to believe that there is more to the “civil rights” opposition to Net Neutrality than money, politics, relationships, or just plain lack of understanding. For now, I’m doing my best to keep an open mind. But I don’t think it will stay that way for much longer.</p><p></p><p><em>James Rucker is a co-founder of <a href="http://www.ColorOfChange.org" target="_blank" title="ColorOfChange.org">ColorOfChange.org</a>.</em></p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>By James Rucker Guest Contributor It’s said that politics creates strange bedfellows. I was reminded how true this can be when I traveled to D.C. in recent weeks to figure out why several advocacy groups and legislators with histories of advocating for minority interests are lining up with big telecom companies in opposition to the FCC’s efforts to pass “Net Neutrality” rules. Net Neutrality is the principle that prevents Internet Service Providers from controlling what kind of content or applications you can access online. It sounds wonky, but for Black and other communities, an open Internet offers a transformative opportunity to truly control our own voice and image, while reaching the largest number of people possible. This dynamic is one major reason why Barack Obama was elected president and why organizations like ColorOfChange.org exist. So I was troubled to learn that several Congressional Black Caucus members were among 72 Democrats...</description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/VHELEsdp-7o/oct14letter.pdf" fileSize="251701" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>By James Rucker Guest Contributor It’s said that politics creates strange bedfellows. I was reminded how true this can be when I traveled to D.C. in recent weeks to figure out why several advocacy groups and legislators with histories of advocating for mi</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>By James Rucker Guest Contributor It’s said that politics creates strange bedfellows. I was reminded how true this can be when I traveled to D.C. in recent weeks to figure out why several advocacy groups and legislators with histories of advocating for minority interests are lining up with big telecom companies in opposition to the FCC’s efforts to pass “Net Neutrality” rules. Net Neutrality is the principle that prevents Internet Service Providers from controlling what kind of content or applications you can access online. It sounds wonky, but for Black and other communities, an open Internet offers a transformative opportunity to truly control our own voice and image, while reaching the largest number of people possible. This dynamic is one major reason why Barack Obama was elected president and why organizations like ColorOfChange.org exist. So I was troubled to learn that several Congressional Black Caucus members were among 72 Democrats...</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/01/why-are-some-civil-rights-groups-leaders-on-the-wrong-side-of-net-neutrality.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/VHELEsdp-7o/oct14letter.pdf" length="251701" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://colorofchange.org/docs/oct14letter.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>Colorlines: State of Whose Union?: Obama and Race at One Year (VIDEO)</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/8CTZkEdYtpk/colorlines-state-of-whose-union-obama-and-race-at-one-year-video.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Current Affairs</category><category>Interviews</category><category>ObamaWatch</category><category>Politics</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Publisher's blog</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Television</category><category>Colorlines</category><category>Congress</category><category>great recession</category><category>meltdown</category><category>Obama</category><category>recovery</category><category>SOTU</category><category>speeches</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:23:00 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a81c7a33970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JVb34QpIXyo&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JVb34QpIXyo&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>President Barack Obama almost gave us a call to action tonight. Commentators Chris Rabb and Lola Adesioye sat down with ARCs Tammy Johnson following the presidents State of the Union. Chris is founder of Afro-Netizen and author of the forthcoming Invisible Capital: How Unseen Forces Shape Entrepreneurial Opportunity. Lola is a writer-activist and formerly an editor at The Grio. </description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/GeVoZbyX_aM/JVb34QpIXyo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" fileSize="1104" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>President Barack Obama almost gave us a call to action tonight. Commentators Chris Rabb and Lola Adesioye sat down with ARCs Tammy Johnson following the presidents State of the Union. Chris is founder of Afro-Netizen and author of the forthcoming Invisibl</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>President Barack Obama almost gave us a call to action tonight. Commentators Chris Rabb and Lola Adesioye sat down with ARCs Tammy Johnson following the presidents State of the Union. Chris is founder of Afro-Netizen and author of the forthcoming Invisible Capital: How Unseen Forces Shape Entrepreneurial Opportunity. Lola is a writer-activist and formerly an editor at The Grio. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/01/colorlines-state-of-whose-union-obama-and-race-at-one-year-video.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/GeVoZbyX_aM/JVb34QpIXyo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" length="1104" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.youtube.com/v/JVb34QpIXyo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>Video, audio and text versions of President Barack Obama's first State of the Union address</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/1orT5wvB5NI/video-audio-and-text-versions-of-president-barack-obamas-first-state-of-the-union-address.html</link><category>ObamaWatch</category><category>Politics</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Television</category><category>Congress</category><category>Obama</category><category>recovery</category><category>SOTU</category><category>speech</category><category>State of the Union</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:23:47 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a81d33b1970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><object height="300" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/player.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="bgcolor" value="282828"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="file=http://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/2010/January/012710_StateoftheUnion.m4v&amp;path_to_plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins&amp;path_to_player=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player&amp;skin=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/skins/EOP_skin.swf&amp;captions_url=&amp;image=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/audio-video/video_thumbnail/SOTU-2.jpg&amp;controlbar=bottom&amp;frontcolor=AAAAAA&amp;plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/privacy/privacy,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/hat/hat,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/share/share,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/captions/captions&amp;captions.file="></param><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="file=http://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/2010/January/012710_StateoftheUnion.m4v&amp;path_to_plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins&amp;path_to_player=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player&amp;skin=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/skins/EOP_skin.swf&amp;captions_url=&amp;image=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/audio-video/video_thumbnail/SOTU-2.jpg&amp;controlbar=bottom&amp;frontcolor=AAAAAA&amp;plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/privacy/privacy,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/hat/hat,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/share/share,http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/plugins/captions/captions&amp;captions.file=&amp;stretching=fill&amp;menu=false" height="300" src="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></embed></object>

<p></p>
<span style="color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: normal; "><h1 property="dc:title" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 12px; color: black; margin-bottom: 10px; ">Remarks by the President in State of the Union Address</h1><h1 property="dc:title" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 12px; color: black; margin-bottom: 10px; ">Courtesy of <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-state-union-address" target="_blank" title="2010 State of the Union speech transcript">WhiteHouse.gov</a></h1><h1 property="dc:title" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 12px; color: black; margin-bottom: 10px; ">(To listen to the audio version, <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/2010/January/012710_StateoftheUnion.mp3" target="_blank" title="Audio version of the 2010 State of the Union address">click here</a>.)</h1><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "></p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">[Text put <strong>in bold</strong> by Afro-Netizen.]</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "><strong>9:11 P.M. EST</strong></p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "><strong>THE PRESIDENT</strong>:  Madam Speaker, Vice President Biden, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Our Constitution declares that from time to time, the President shall give to Congress information about the state of our union.  For 220 years, our leaders have fulfilled this duty. They've done so during periods of prosperity and tranquility.  And they've done so in the midst of war and depression; at moments of great strife and great struggle.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">It's tempting to look back on these moments and assume that our progress was inevitable -– that America was always destined to succeed.  But when the Union was turned back at Bull Run, and the Allies first landed at Omaha Beach, victory was very much in doubt.  When the market crashed on Black Tuesday, and civil rights marchers were beaten on Bloody Sunday, the future was anything but certain.  These were the times that tested the courage of our convictions, and the strength of our union.  And despite all our divisions and disagreements, our hesitations and our fears, America prevailed because we chose to move forward as one nation, as one people. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Again, we are tested.  And again, we must answer history's call.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">One year ago, I took office amid two wars, an economy rocked by a severe recession, a financial system on the verge of collapse, and a government deeply in debt.  Experts from across the political spectrum warned that if we did not act, we might face a second depression.  So we acted -– immediately and aggressively.  And one year later, the worst of the storm has passed.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">But the devastation remains.  One in 10 Americans still cannot find work.  Many businesses have shuttered.  Home values have declined.  Small towns and rural communities have been hit especially hard.  And for those who'd already known poverty, life has become that much harder.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">This recession has also compounded the burdens that America's families have been dealing with for decades –- the burden of working harder and longer for less; of being unable to save enough to retire or help kids with college. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">So I know the anxieties that are out there right now.  They're not new.  These struggles are the reason I ran for President.  These struggles are what I've witnessed for years in places like Elkhart, Indiana; Galesburg, Illinois.  I hear about them in the letters that I read each night.  The toughest to read are those written by children -– asking why they have to move from their home, asking when their mom or dad will be able to go back to work.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">For these Americans and so many others, change has not come fast enough.  Some are frustrated; some are angry.  They don't understand why it seems like bad behavior on Wall Street is rewarded, but hard work on Main Street isn't; or why Washington has been unable or unwilling to solve any of our problems.  They're tired of the partisanship and the shouting and the pettiness.  They know we can't afford it.  Not now.  </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">So we face big and difficult challenges.  And what the American people hope -– what they deserve -– is for all of us, Democrats and Republicans, to work through our differences; to overcome the numbing weight of our politics.  For while the people who sent us here have different backgrounds, different stories, different beliefs, the anxieties they face are the same. The aspirations they hold are shared:  a job that pays the bills; a chance to get ahead; most of all, the ability to give their children a better life. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">You know what else they share?  They share a stubborn resilience in the face of adversity.  After one of the most difficult years in our history, they remain busy building cars and teaching kids, starting businesses and going back to school. They're coaching Little League and helping their neighbors.  One woman wrote to me and said, "We are strained but hopeful, struggling but encouraged." </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">It's because of this spirit -– this great decency and great strength -– that I have never been more hopeful about America's future than I am tonight.  (Applause.)  Despite our hardships, our union is strong.  We do not give up.  We do not quit.  We do not allow fear or division to break our spirit.  In this new decade, it's time the American people get a government that matches their decency; that embodies their strength.  (Applause.)    <br>And tonight, tonight I'd like to talk about how together we can deliver on that promise.   </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">It begins with our economy. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Our most urgent task upon taking office was to shore up the same banks that helped cause this crisis.  It was not easy to do. And i<strong>f there's one thing that has unified Democrats and Republicans, and everybody in between, it's that we all hated the bank bailout.  I hated it </strong>-- (applause.)<strong>  I hated it.  You hated it.  It was about as popular as a root canal.</strong>  (Laughter.)  </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">But <strong>when I ran for President, I promised I wouldn't just do what was popular -– I would do what was necessary</strong>.  And if we had allowed the meltdown of the financial system, unemployment might be double what it is today.  More businesses would certainly have closed.  More homes would have surely been lost. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">So I supported the last administration's efforts to create the financial rescue program.  And when we took that program over, we made it more transparent and more accountable.  And as a result,<strong> the markets are now stabilized, and we've recovered most of the money we spent on the banks.</strong>  (Applause.)  Most but not all.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">To recover the rest, I've proposed a fee on the biggest banks.  (Applause.)  Now, I know Wall Street isn't keen on this idea.  But<strong> if these firms can afford to hand out big bonuses again, they can afford a modest fee to pay back the taxpayers who rescued them in their time of need</strong>.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, as we stabilized the financial system, we also took steps to get our economy growing again, save as many jobs as possible, and help Americans who had become unemployed. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">That's why <strong>we extended or increased unemployment benefits for more than 18 million Americans; made health insurance 65 percent cheaper for families who get their coverage through COBRA</strong>; and passed 25 different tax cuts.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, let me repeat:  We cut taxes.  We cut taxes for 95 percent of working families.  (Applause.)  We cut taxes for small businesses.  We cut taxes for first-time homebuyers.  <strong>We cut taxes for parents trying to care for their children.  We cut taxes for 8 million Americans paying for college</strong>.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">I thought I'd get some applause on that one.  (Laughter and applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">As a result, millions of Americans had more to spend on gas and food and other necessities, all of which helped businesses keep more workers.  And we haven't raised income taxes by a single dime on a single person.  Not a single dime.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Because of the steps we took, there are about two million Americans working right now who would otherwise be unemployed.  (Applause.)  Two hundred thousand work in construction and clean energy; 300,000 are teachers and other education workers.  Tens of thousands are cops, firefighters, correctional officers, first responders.  (Applause.)  And we're on track to add another one and a half million jobs to this total by the end of the year.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">The plan that has made all of this possible, from the tax cuts to the jobs, is the Recovery Act.  (Applause.)  That's right -– the Recovery Act, also known as the stimulus bill.  (Applause.)  Economists on the left and the right say this bill has helped save jobs and avert disaster.  But you don't have to take their word for it.  Talk to the small business in Phoenix that will triple its workforce because of the Recovery Act.  Talk to the window manufacturer in Philadelphia who said he used to be skeptical about the Recovery Act, until he had to add two more work shifts just because of the business it created.  Talk to the single teacher raising two kids who was told by her principal in the last week of school that because of the Recovery Act, she wouldn't be laid off after all. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">There are stories like this all across America.  And after two years of recession, the economy is growing again.  Retirement funds have started to gain back some of their value.  Businesses are beginning to invest again, and slowly some are starting to hire again.   </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">But I realize that for every success story, there are other stories, of men and women who wake up with the anguish of not knowing where their next paycheck will come from; who send out resumes week after week and hear nothing in response.  That is why jobs must be our number-one focus in 2010, and that's why I'm calling for a new jobs bill tonight.  (Applause.)  </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, <strong>the true engine of job creation in this country will always be America's businesses. </strong> (Applause.)  <strong>But government can create the conditions necessary for businesses to expand and hire more workers.</strong> </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "><strong>We should start where most new jobs do –- in small businesses, companies that begin when -- (applause) -- companies that begin when an entrepreneur -- when an entrepreneur takes a chance on a dream, or a worker decides it's time she became her own boss</strong><strong>.  Through sheer grit and determination, these companies have weathered the recession and they're ready to grow.</strong>  But when you talk to small businessowners in places like Allentown, Pennsylvania, or Elyria, Ohio, you find out that even though banks on Wall Street are lending again, they're mostly lending to bigger companies.  Financing remains difficult for small businessowners across the country, even those that are making a profit.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">So tonight, <strong>I'm proposing that we take $30 billion of the money Wall Street banks have repaid and use it to help community banks give small businesses the credit they need to stay afloat.</strong> (Applause.)  <strong>I'm also proposing a new small business tax credit -– one that will go to over one million small businesses who hire new workers or raise wages.</strong>  (Applause.)  While we're at it, let's also eliminate all capital gains taxes on small business investment, and provide a tax incentive for all large businesses and all small businesses to invest in new plants and equipment.  (Applause.) </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Next, we can put Americans to work today building the infrastructure of tomorrow.  (Applause.)  From the first railroads to the Interstate Highway System, our nation has always been built to compete.  There's no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains, or the new factories that manufacture clean energy products.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Tomorrow, I'll visit Tampa, Florida, where workers will soon break ground on a new high-speed railroad funded by the Recovery Act.  (Applause.)  There are projects like that all across this country that will create jobs and help move our nation's goods, services, and information.  (Applause.) </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">We should put more Americans to work building clean energy facilities -- (applause) -- and giv<strong>e rebates to Americans who make their homes more energy-efficient</strong>, which supports clean energy jobs.  (Applause.)  And to encourage these and other businesses to stay within our borders, it is time to finally<strong> slash the tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas</strong><strong>, and give those tax breaks to companies that create jobs right here in the United States of America.</strong>  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, the House has passed a jobs bill that includes some of these steps.  (Applause.)  As the first order of business this year, I urge the Senate to do the same, and I know they will.  (Applause.)  They will.  (Applause.)  People are out of work.  They're hurting.  They need our help.  And I want a jobs bill on my desk without delay.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">But the truth is, these steps won't make up for the seven million jobs that we've lost over the last two years.  The only way to move to full employment is to lay a new foundation for long-term economic growth, and finally address the problems that America's families have confronted for years.  </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">We can't afford another so-called economic "expansion" like the one from the last decade –- what some call the "lost decade" -– where jobs grew more slowly than during any prior expansion; where the income of the average American household declined while the cost of health care and tuition reached record highs; where prosperity was built on a housing bubble and financial speculation. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">From the day I took office, I've been told that addressing our larger challenges is too ambitious; such an effort would be too contentious.  I've been told that our political system is too gridlocked, and that we should just put things on hold for a while. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">For those who make these claims, I have one simple question: How long should we wait?  How long should America put its future on hold?  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">You see, Washington has been telling us to wait for decades, even as the problems have grown worse.  Meanwhile, China is not waiting to revamp its economy.  Germany is not waiting.  India is not waiting.  These nations -- they're not standing still.  These nations aren't playing for second place.  They're putting more emphasis on math and science.  They're rebuilding their infrastructure.  They're making serious investments in clean energy because they want those jobs.  Well, I do not accept second place for the United States of America.  (Applause.) </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">As hard as it may be, as uncomfortable and contentious as the debates may become, it's time to get serious about fixing the problems that are hampering our growth.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, one place to start is serious financial reform.  Look, I am not interested in punishing banks.  I'm interested in protecting our economy.  A strong, healthy financial market makes it possible for businesses to access credit and create new jobs. It channels the savings of families into investments that raise incomes.  But that can only happen if we guard against the same recklessness that nearly brought down our entire economy. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">We need to make sure consumers and middle-class families have the information they need to make financial decisions.  (Applause.)  We can't allow financial institutions, including those that take your deposits, to take risks that threaten the whole economy.  </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, the House has already passed financial reform with many of these changes.  (Applause.)  And the lobbyists are trying to kill it.  But we cannot let them win this fight.  (Applause.)  And if the bill that ends up on my desk does not meet the test of real reform, I will send it back until we get it right.  We've got to get it right.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Next, we need to encourage American innovation.  Last year, we made the largest investment in basic research funding in history -– (applause) -- an investment that could lead to the world's cheapest solar cells or treatment that kills cancer cells but leaves healthy ones untouched.  And no area is more ripe for such innovation than energy.  You can see the results of last year's investments in clean energy -– in the North Carolina company that will create 1,200 jobs nationwide helping to make advanced batteries; or in the California business that will put a thousand people to work making solar panels.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">But to create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives.  And t<strong>hat means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country.  </strong>(Applause.<strong>)  It means making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development.  </strong>(Applause<strong>.)  It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies.</strong>  (Applause.)  And, yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">I am grateful to the House for passing such a bill last year.  (Applause.)  And this year I'm eager to help advance the bipartisan effort in the Senate.  (Applause.) </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">I know there have been questions about whether we can afford such changes in a tough economy.  I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change.  But here's the thing -- even if you doubt the evidence, providing incentives for energy-efficiency and clean energy are the right thing to do for our future -– because<strong> the nation that leads the clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy.  And America must be that nation.</strong>  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Third, we need to export more of our goods.  (Applause.)  Because the more products we make and sell to other countries, the more jobs we support right here in America.  (Applause.)  So tonight, we set a new goal:  We will double our exports over the next five years, an increase that will support two million jobs in America.  (Applause.)  To help meet this goal, <strong>we're launching a National Export Initiative that will help farmers and small businesses increase their exports, and reform export controls consistent with national security.</strong>  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">We have to seek new markets aggressively, just as our competitors are.  If America sits on the sidelines while other nations sign trade deals, we will lose the chance to create jobs on our shores.  (Applause.)  But realizing those benefits also means enforcing those agreements so our trading partners play by the rules.  (Applause.)  And that's why we'll continue to shape a Doha trade agreement that opens global markets, and why we will strengthen our trade relations in Asia and with key partners like South Korea and Panama and Colombia.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Fourth, we need to invest in the skills and education of our people.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, this year, we've broken through the stalemate between left and right by launching a national competition to improve our schools.  And the idea here is simple:  Instead of rewarding failure, we only reward success.  Instead of funding the status quo, we only invest in reform -- reform that raises student achievement; inspires students to excel in math and science; and turns around failing schools that steal the future of too many young Americans, from rural communities to the inner city.  In the 21st century, <strong>the best anti-poverty program around is a world-class education.</strong>  (Applause.)  And in this country, the success of our children cannot depend more on where they live than on their potential. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">When we renew the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, we will work with Congress to expand these reforms to all 50 states.  Still, in this economy, a high school diploma no longer guarantees a good job.  That's why <strong>I urge the Senate to follow the House and pass a bill that will revitalize our community colleges</strong>, which are a career pathway to the children of so many working families.  (Applause.) </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "><strong>To make college more affordable, this bill will finally end the unwarranted taxpayer subsidies that go to banks for student loans. </strong> (Applause.)  Instead, <strong>let's take that money and give families a $10,000 tax credit for four years of college and increase Pell Grants.</strong>  (Applause.)  <strong>And let's tell another one million students that when they graduate, they will be required to pay only 10 percent of their income on student loans, and all of their debt will be forgiven after 20 years –- and forgiven after 10 years if they choose a career in public service, because in the United States of America, no one should go broke because they chose to go to college.</strong>  (Applause.) </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">And by the way, it's time for colleges and universities to get serious about cutting their own costs -– (applause) -- because they, too, have a responsibility to help solve this problem. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, the price of college tuition is just one of the burdens facing the middle class.  That's why last year I asked Vice President Biden to chair a task force on middle-class families.  That's why <strong>we're nearly doubling the child care tax credit</strong>,<strong> and making it easier to save for retirement by giving access to every worker a retirement account and expanding the tax credit for those who start a nest egg.</strong>  That's why we're working to lift the value of a family's single largest investment –- their home.  The steps we took last year to shore up the housing market have allowed millions of Americans to take out new loans and save an average of $1,500 on mortgage payments.     </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">This year, we will step up refinancing so that homeowners can move into more affordable mortgages.  (Applause.)  And it is precisely to relieve the burden on middle-class families that we still need health insurance reform.  (Applause.)  Yes, we do.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, let's clear a few things up.  (Laughter.)  I didn't choose to tackle this issue to get some legislative victory under my belt.  And by now it should be fairly obvious that I didn't take on health care because it was good politics.  (Laughter.)  I took on health care because of the stories I've heard from Americans with preexisting conditions whose lives depend on getting coverage; patients who've been denied coverage; families –- even those with insurance -– who are just one illness away from financial ruin.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">After nearly a century of trying -- Democratic administrations, Republican administrations -- we are closer than ever to bringing more security to the lives of so many Americans.  The approach we've taken would protect every American from the worst practices of the insurance industry.  It would give small businesses and uninsured Americans a chance to choose an affordable health care plan in a competitive market.  It would require every insurance plan to cover preventive care. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">And by the way, I want to acknowledge our First Lady, Michelle Obama, who this year is creating a national movement to tackle the epidemic of childhood obesity and make kids healthier. (Applause.)  Thank you.  She gets embarrassed.  (Laughter.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Our approach would preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan.  It would reduce costs and premiums for millions of families and businesses.  And according to the Congressional Budget Office -– the independent organization that both parties have cited as the official scorekeeper for Congress –- our approach would bring down the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next two decades.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Still, this is a complex issue, and the longer it was debated, the more skeptical people became.  I take my share of the blame for not explaining it more clearly to the American people.  And I know that with all the lobbying and horse-trading, the process left most Americans wondering, "What's in it for me?"</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">But I also know this problem is not going away.  By the time I'm finished speaking tonight, more Americans will have lost their health insurance.  Millions will lose it this year.  Our deficit will grow.  Premiums will go up.  Patients will be denied the care they need.  Small business owners will continue to drop coverage altogether.  I will not walk away from these Americans, and neither should the people in this chamber.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">So, as temperatures cool, I want everyone to take another look at the plan we've proposed.  There's a reason why many doctors, nurses, and health care experts who know our system best consider this approach a vast improvement over the status quo.  But if anyone from either party has a better approach that will bring down premiums, bring down the deficit, cover the uninsured, strengthen Medicare for seniors, and stop insurance company abuses, let me know.  (Applause.)  Let me know.  Let me know.  (Applause.)  I'm eager to see it. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Here's what I ask Congress, though:  Don't walk away from reform.  Not now.  Not when we are so close.  Let us find a way to come together and finish the job for the American people.  (Applause.)  Let's get it done.  Let's get it done.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, even as health care reform would reduce our deficit, it's not enough to dig us out of a massive fiscal hole in which we find ourselves.  It's a challenge that makes all others that much harder to solve, and one that's been subject to a lot of political posturing.  So let me start the discussion of government spending by setting the record straight. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "><strong>At the beginning of the last decade, the year 2000, America had a budget surplus of over $200 billion.  </strong>(Applause.) <strong> By the time I took office, we had a one-year deficit of over $1 trillion and projected deficits of $8 trillion over the next decade.  Most of this was the result of not paying for two wars, two tax cuts, and an expensive prescription drug program.  On top of that, the effects of the recession put a $3 trillion hole in our budget.  All this was before I walked in the door. </strong> (Laughter and applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now -- just stating the facts.  Now, if we had taken office in ordinary times, I would have liked nothing more than to start bringing down the deficit.  But we took office amid a crisis.  And our efforts to prevent a second depression have added another $1 trillion to our national debt.  That, too, is a fact.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">I'm absolutely convinced that was the right thing to do.  But families across the country are tightening their belts and making tough decisions.  The federal government should do the same.  (Applause.)  So tonight, I'm proposing specific steps to pay for the trillion dollars that it took to rescue the economy last year.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "><strong>Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years.  </strong>(Applause.) <strong> Spending related to our national security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will not be affected.  But all other discretionary government programs will. </strong> Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don't.  And if I have to enforce this discipline by veto, I will.  (Applause.)  </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">We will continue to go through the budget, line by line, page by page, to eliminate programs that we can't afford and don't work.  We've already identified $20 billion in savings for next year. <strong> To help working families, we'll extend our middle-class tax cuts.</strong>  <strong>But at a time of record deficits, we will not continue tax cuts for oil companies, for investment fund managers, and for those making over $250,000 a year.  </strong>We just can't afford it.  (Applause.) </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, even after paying for what we spent on my watch, we'll still face the massive deficit we had when I took office.  More importantly, <strong>the cost of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will continue to skyrocket.  That's why I've called for a bipartisan fiscal commission, modeled on a proposal by Republican Judd Gregg and Democrat Kent Conrad.</strong>  (Applause.)  This can't be one of those Washington gimmicks that lets us pretend we solved a problem.  The commission will have to provide a specific set of solutions by a certain deadline. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, yesterday, the Senate blocked a bill that would have created this commission.  So I'll issue an executive order that will allow us to go forward, because I refuse to pass this problem on to another generation of Americans.  (Applause.)  And when the vote comes tomorrow, the Senate should restore the pay-as-you-go law that was a big reason for why we had record surpluses in the 1990s.  (Applause.)  <br> <br>Now, I know that some in my own party will argue that we can't address the deficit or freeze government spending when so many are still hurting.  And I agree -- which is why this freeze won't take effect until next year -- (laughter) -- when the economy is stronger.  That's how budgeting works.  (Laughter and applause.)  But understand –- understand if we don't take meaningful steps to rein in our debt, it could damage our markets, increase the cost of borrowing, and jeopardize our recovery -– all of which would have an even worse effect on our job growth and family incomes. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "><strong>From some on the right, I expect we'll hear a different argument -– that if we just make fewer investments in our people, extend tax cuts including those for the wealthier Americans, eliminate more regulations, maintain the status quo on health care, our deficits will go away.  The problem is that's what we did for eight years. </strong> (Applause.)  That's what helped us into this crisis.  It's what helped lead to these deficits.  We can't do it again.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Rather than fight the same tired battles that have dominated Washington for decades, it's time to try something new.  Let's invest in our people without leaving them a mountain of debt.  Let's meet our responsibility to the citizens who sent us here.  Let's try common sense.  (Laughter.)  A novel concept.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">To do that, we have to recognize that we face more than a deficit of dollars right now.  We face a deficit of trust -– deep and corrosive doubts about how Washington works that have been growing for years.  To close that credibility gap we have to take action on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue -- to end the outsized influence of lobbyists; to do our work openly; to give our people the government they deserve.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">That's what I came to Washington to do.  That's why -– for the first time in history –- my administration posts on our White House visitors online.  <strong>That's why we've excluded lobbyists from policymaking jobs, or seats on federal boards and commissions.</strong></p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">But we can't stop there.  It's time to require lobbyists to disclose each contact they make on behalf of a client with my administration or with Congress.  It's time to put strict limits on the contributions that lobbyists give to candidates for federal office. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "><strong>With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests –- including foreign corporations –- to spend without limit in our elections. </strong> (Applause.)  <strong>I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities.</strong>  (Applause.)<strong>  They should be decided by the American people.  And I'd urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to correct some of these problems.</strong></p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">I'm also calling on Congress to continue down the path of earmark reform.  (Applause.)  Democrats and Republicans.  (Applause.)  Democrats and Republicans.  You've trimmed some of this spending, you've embraced some meaningful change.  But restoring the public trust demands more.  For example, some members of Congress post some earmark requests online.  (Applause.)  <strong>Tonight, I'm calling on Congress to publish all earmark requests on a single Web site before there's a vote, so that the American people can see how their money is being spent.</strong> (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Of course, none of these reforms will even happen if we don't also reform how we work with one another.  Now, I'm not naïve.  I never thought that the mere fact of my election would usher in peace and harmony -- (laughter) -- and some post-partisan era.  I knew that both parties have fed divisions that are deeply entrenched.  And on some issues, there are simply philosophical differences that will always cause us to part ways. These disagreements, about the role of government in our lives, about our national priorities and our national security, they've been taking place for over 200 years.  They're the very essence of our democracy.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">But what frustrates the American people is a Washington where every day is Election Day.  We can't wage a perpetual campaign where the only goal is to see who can get the most embarrassing headlines about the other side -– a belief that if you lose, I win.  Neither party should delay or obstruct every single bill just because they can.  The confirmation of -- (applause) -- <strong>I'm speaking to both parties now.  The confirmation of well-qualified public servants shouldn't be held hostage to the pet projects or grudges of a few individual senators.</strong>  (Applause.) </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Washington may think that saying anything about the other side, no matter how false, no matter how malicious, is just part of the game.  But it's precisely such politics that has stopped either party from helping the American people.  Worse yet, it's sowing further division among our citizens, further distrust in our government.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">So, no, I will not give up on trying to change the tone of our politics.  I know it's an election year.  And after last week, it's clear that campaign fever has come even earlier than usual.  But we still need to govern. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "><strong>To Democrats, I would remind you that we still have the largest majority in decades, and the people expect us to solve problems, not run for the hills.  </strong>(Applause.)<strong>  And if the Republican leadership is going to insist that 60 votes in the Senate are required to do any business at all in this town -- a supermajority -- then the responsibility to govern is now yours as well. </strong> (Applause.)<strong>  Just saying no to everything may be good short-term politics, but it's not leadership.</strong>  We were sent here to serve our citizens, not our ambitions.  (Applause.)  So let's show the American people that we can do it together.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">This week, I'll be addressing a meeting of the House Republicans.  I'd like to begin monthly meetings with both Democratic and Republican leadership.  I know you can't wait.  (Laughter.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Throughout our history, no issue has united this country more than our security.  Sadly, some of the unity we felt after 9/11 has dissipated.  We can argue all we want about who's to blame for this, but I'm not interested in re-litigating the past. I know that all of us love this country.  All of us are committed to its defense.  So let's put aside the schoolyard taunts about who's tough.  Let's reject the false choice between protecting our people and upholding our values.  Let's leave behind the fear and division, and do what it takes to defend our nation and forge a more hopeful future -- for America and for the world.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">That's the work we began last year.  Since the day I took office, we've renewed our focus on the terrorists who threaten our nation.  We've made substantial investments in our homeland security and disrupted plots that threatened to take American lives.  We are filling unacceptable gaps revealed by the failed Christmas attack, with better airline security and swifter action on our intelligence.  We've prohibited torture and strengthened partnerships from the Pacific to South Asia to the Arabian Peninsula.  And in the last year, hundreds of al Qaeda's fighters and affiliates, including many senior leaders, have been captured or killed -- far more than in 2008.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">And in Afghanistan, we're increasing our troops and training Afghan security forces so they can begin to take the lead in July of 2011, and our troops can begin to come home.  (Applause.)  We will reward good governance, work to reduce corruption, and support the rights of all Afghans -- men and women alike.  (Applause.)  We're joined by allies and partners who have increased their own commitments, and who will come together tomorrow in London to reaffirm our common purpose.  There will be difficult days ahead.  But I am absolutely confident we will succeed.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "><strong>As we take the fight to al Qaeda, we are responsibly leaving Iraq to its people.  As a candidate, I promised that I would end this war, and that is what I am doing as President.  We will have all of our combat troops out of Iraq by the end of this August.</strong>  (Applause.)  We will support the Iraqi government -- we will support the Iraqi government as they hold elections, and we will continue to partner with the Iraqi people to promote regional peace and prosperity.  But mak<strong>e no mistake:  This war is ending, and all of our troops are coming home. </strong> (Applause.)   </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Tonight, all of our men and women in uniform -- in Iraq, in Afghanistan, and around the world –- they have to know that we -- that they have our respect, our gratitude, our full support.  And just as they must have the resources they need in war, we all have a responsibility to support them when they come home.  (Applause.)  That's why <strong>we made the largest increase in investments for veterans in decades -- last year. </strong> (Applause.)   That's why we're building a 21st century VA.  And that's why Michelle has joined with Jill Biden to forge a national commitment to support military families.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, even as we prosecute two wars, we're also confronting perhaps the greatest danger to the American people -– the threat of nuclear weapons.  I've embraced the vision of John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan through a strategy that reverses the spread of these weapons and seeks a world without them.  To reduce our stockpiles and launchers, while ensuring our deterrent, the United States and Russia are completing negotiations on the farthest-reaching arms control treaty in nearly two decades.  (Applause.)  And <strong>at April's Nuclear Security Summit, we will bring 44 nations together here in Washington, D.C. behind a clear goal:  securing all vulnerable nuclear materials around the world in four years, so that they never fall into the hands of terrorists.</strong>  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Now, these diplomatic efforts have also strengthened our hand in dealing with those nations that insist on violating international agreements in pursuit of nuclear weapons.  That's why North Korea now faces increased isolation, and stronger sanctions –- sanctions that are being vigorously enforced.  That's why the international community is more united, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is more isolated.  And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt:  They, too, will face growing consequences.  That is a promise.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">That's the leadership that we are providing –- engagement that advances the common security and prosperity of all people. We're working through the G20 to sustain a lasting global recovery.  We're working with Muslim communities around the world to promote science and education and innovation. <strong> We have gone from a bystander to a leader in the fight against climate change.</strong> We're helping developing countries to feed themselves, and continuing the fight against HIV/AIDS.  And we are launching a new initiative that will give us the capacity to respond faster and more effectively to bioterrorism or an infectious disease -– a plan that will counter threats at home and strengthen public health abroad.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "><strong>As we have for over 60 years, America takes these actions because our destiny is connected to those beyond our shores.  But we also do it because it is right.  That's why, as we meet here tonight, over 10,000 Americans are working with many nations to help the people of Haiti recover and rebuild.</strong>  (Applause.)  That's why we stand with the girl who yearns to go to school in Afghanistan; why we support the human rights of the women marching through the streets of Iran; why we advocate for the young man denied a job by corruption in Guinea.  For America must always stand on the side of freedom and human dignity.  (Applause.)  Always.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Abroad, America's greatest source of strength has always been our ideals.  The same is true at home.  We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution:  the notion that we're all created equal; that no matter who you are or what you look like, if you abide by the law you should be protected by it; if you adhere to our common values you should be treated no different than anyone else.    </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">We must continually renew this promise.  <strong>My administration has a Civil Rights Division that is once again prosecuting civil rights violations and employment discrimination.</strong>  (Applause.)  <strong>We finally strengthened our laws to protect against crimes driven by hate.</strong>  (Applause.)  <strong>This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are.</strong>  (Applause.)  It's the right thing to do.  (Applause.)  </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "><strong>We're going to crack down on violations of equal pay laws -– so that women get equal pay for an equal day's work.  </strong>(Applause.)<strong> And we should continue the work of fixing our broken immigration system -– to secure our borders and enforce our laws, and ensure that everyone who plays by the rules can contribute to our economy and enrich our nation.</strong>  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">In the end, it's our ideals, our values that built America  -- values that allowed us to forge a nation made up of immigrants from every corner of the globe; values that drive our citizens still.  Every day, Americans meet their responsibilities to their families and their employers.  Time and again, they lend a hand to their neighbors and give back to their country.  They take pride in their labor, and are generous in spirit.  These aren't Republican values or Democratic values that they're living by; business values or labor values.  They're American values.  </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Unfortunately, too many of our citizens have lost faith that our biggest institutions -– our corporations, our media, and, yes, our government –- still reflect these same values.  Each of these institutions are full of honorable men and women doing important work that helps our country prosper.  But each time a CEO rewards himself for failure, or a banker puts the rest of us at risk for his own selfish gain, people's doubts grow.  Each time lobbyists game the system or politicians tear each other down instead of lifting this country up, we lose faith.  The more that TV pundits reduce serious debates to silly arguments, big issues into sound bites, our citizens turn away.  </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">No wonder there's so much cynicism out there.  No wonder there's so much disappointment. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">I campaigned on the promise of change –- change we can believe in, the slogan went.  And right now, I know there are many Americans who aren't sure if they still believe we can change –- or that I can deliver it. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">But remember this –- I<strong> never suggested that change would be easy, or that I could do it alone.  Democracy in a nation of 300 million people can be noisy and messy and complicated.  And when you try to do big things and make big changes, it stirs passions and controversy. </strong> That's just how it is.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; "><strong>Those of us in public office can respond to this reality by playing it safe and avoid telling hard truths and pointing fingers.  Or we can do what's necessary to keep our poll numbers high, and get through the next election instead of doing what's best for the next generation. </strong></p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">But I also know this:  If people had made that decision 50 years ago, or 100 years ago, or 200 years ago, we wouldn't be here tonight.  The only reason we are here is because generations of Americans were unafraid to do what was hard; to do what was needed even when success was uncertain; to do what it took to keep the dream of this nation alive for their children and their grandchildren.</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Our administration has had some political setbacks this year, and some of them were deserved.  But I wake up every day knowing that they are nothing compared to the setbacks that families all across this country have faced this year.  And what keeps me going -– what keeps me fighting -– is that despite all these setbacks, that spirit of determination and optimism, that fundamental decency that has always been at the core of the American people, that lives on.   </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">It lives on in the struggling small business owner who wrote to me of his company, "None of us," he said, "…are willing to consider, even slightly, that we might fail."</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">It lives on in the woman who said that even though she and her neighbors have felt the pain of recession, "We are strong.  We are resilient.  We are American."</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">It lives on in the 8-year-old boy in Louisiana, who just sent me his allowance and asked if I would give it to the people of Haiti. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">And it lives on in all the Americans who've dropped everything to go someplace they've never been and pull people they've never known from the rubble, prompting chants of "U.S.A.! U.S.A.!  U.S.A!" when another life was saved. </p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">The spirit that has sustained this nation for more than two centuries lives on in you, its people.  We have finished a difficult year.  We have come through a difficult decade.  But a new year has come.  A new decade stretches before us.  We don't quit.  I don't quit.  (Applause.)  Let's seize this moment -- to start anew, to carry the dream forward, and to strengthen our union once more.  (Applause.)</p><p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 0.75em; line-height: 1.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; ">Thank you.  God bless you.  And God bless the United States of America.  (Applause.)</p></span></div>]]></content:encoded><description>This post includes video, audio and text versions of President Barack Obama's first State of the Union address.

Judge for yourself and let Afro-Netizen know what you thought of it.</description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/vvdY34bwLRY/012710_StateoftheUnion.mp3" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>This post includes video, audio and text versions of President Barack Obama's first State of the Union address. Judge for yourself and let Afro-Netizen know what you thought of it.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>This post includes video, audio and text versions of President Barack Obama's first State of the Union address. Judge for yourself and let Afro-Netizen know what you thought of it.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/01/video-audio-and-text-versions-of-president-barack-obamas-first-state-of-the-union-address.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/vvdY34bwLRY/012710_StateoftheUnion.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/2010/January/012710_StateoftheUnion.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>Watch President Obama's first State of the Union address live (VIDEO)</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/U5Ik9hq9Sk8/watch-president-obamas-first-state-of-the-union-address-live-video.html</link><category>Current Affairs</category><category>ObamaWatch</category><category>Politics</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Television</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:14:02 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a81a36c4970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><object width="640" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/EOP_OVP_player.swf"</param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain"</param><param name="wmode" value="opaque"</param><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF"</param><param name="scale" value="showall"</param><param name="quality" value="best"</param><param name="align" value="l"</param><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"</param><param name="play" value="false" </param><param name="menu" value="false" </param><param name="loop" value="false"</param><param name="flashvars" value="player=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/EOP_OVP_player.swf&src=rtmp://cp68969.live.edgefcs.net/live/WHLive3@4855&scaleMode=stretch&link=&path_to_image=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/themes/whitehouse/img/facebook_bubble.gif&width=640&height=400"</param><embed src="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/EOP_OVP_player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="360" flashvars="player=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/EOP_OVP_player.swf&src=rtmp://cp68969.live.edgefcs.net/live/WHLive3@4855&scaleMode=stretch&link=&path_to_image=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/themes/whitehouse/img/facebook_bubble.gif&width=640&height=400"</embed></object><!-- LIVE CHAT --><div style="background-color:#282828; width:640px; font-size:10px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif;"><div style="border-top:solid 1px #666666; margin:0 10px; height:40px; display:block;"><div style=" background:url(http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/themes/whitehouse/img/facebook_bubble.gif) no-repeat; padding-top:13px; height:30px; float:left;"><a href="http://apps.facebook.com/whitehouselive/" style="text-decoration:none; color:#ABABAB; margin-left:28px;">JOIN THE LIVE CHAT</a></div><div style="padding-top:13px; height:30px; float:right;"><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov" style="text-decoration:none; color:#ABABAB;">VISIT WHITEHOUSE.GOV</a></div></div></div><!-- END LIVE CHAT -->

</div>
]]></content:encoded><description>JOIN THE LIVE CHAT VISIT WHITEHOUSE.GOV</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/01/watch-president-obamas-first-state-of-the-union-address-live-video.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>People's historian, Howard Zinn, dead at 87</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/iarwCs13ffk/peoples-historian-howard-zinn-dead-at-87.html</link><category>Death/In Memoriam</category><category>Obituaries</category><category>Politics</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Publisher's blog</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Bush</category><category>Howard Zinn</category><category>Obama</category><category>Pentagon</category><category>torture</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:14:00 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a81a3eaf970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0128771d33f4970c-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="HowardZinn1" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0128771d33f4970c " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0128771d33f4970c-120wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;"></img></a> Brother Zinn died today due to a heart attack in Santa Monica, California at age 87.</p><p>He will be sorely missed. </p><p>If you haven't already bought <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Peoples-History-United-States-Present/dp/0060838655/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1264637957&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank" title="Amazon: The People's History of the United States">The People's History of the United States</a>, please buy it today. In fact, buy multiple copies and share them widely.</p>

<p>For news stories on Howard Zinn's life and death, <a href="http://news.google.com/news?q=%22Howard%20Zinn%22&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;hl=en&amp;tab=wn" target="_blank" title="Google News search: &quot;Howard Zinn&quot;">click here</a>.</p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cbuux_onuco&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cbuux_onuco&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425"></embed></object>

To see Part 2/6, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHmSyB_E_Jk" target="_blank" title="See the next video">click here</a>.</div>]]></content:encoded><description>Brother Zinn will be sorely missed. If you haven't already bought The People's History of the United States, please buy it today. In fact, buy multiple copies and share them widely.

For news stories on Howard Zinn's life and death, click here.</description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/ukHq5njxSpY/Cbuux_onuco&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" fileSize="1031" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Brother Zinn will be sorely missed. If you haven't already bought The People's History of the United States, please buy it today. In fact, buy multiple copies and share them widely. For news stories on Howard Zinn's life and death, click here.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Brother Zinn will be sorely missed. If you haven't already bought The People's History of the United States, please buy it today. In fact, buy multiple copies and share them widely. For news stories on Howard Zinn's life and death, click here.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/01/peoples-historian-howard-zinn-dead-at-87.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/ukHq5njxSpY/Cbuux_onuco&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" length="1031" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.youtube.com/v/Cbuux_onuco&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>Massachusetts teaches us a lesson "we" shouldn't have had to learn this way</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/qaqu8JVIeJI/massachusetts-teaches-us-a-lesson-we-shouldnt-have-had-to-learn-this-way.html</link><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>Beltway</category><category>Coakley</category><category>filibuster</category><category>gridlock</category><category>MLK</category><category>movement-building</category><category>Obama</category><category>politics</category><category>Senate</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:41:00 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876f3168d970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>Many Democrats are stunned that "we" <a href="http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;hs=KJm&amp;q=Coakley%20Brown&amp;aql=&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wn" target="_blank" title="Google News search: Coakley Brown">lost Massachusetts</a>.</p><p>We shouldn't be.</p><p>"We" were complacent. </p><p>"We" were arrogant. </p><p>"We" learned the wrong lessons from Obama's victory just over a year ago.</p><p>"We" thought America voted for Obama. <em>Nope.</em></p><p>"We" thought America wanted change. Not so much. (America wanted a change -- just not <em>social</em> change.)</p><p>"We" thought Obama's victory represented a new chapter in race relations. <em>Nah.</em></p><p>"We" confused the throngs of new voters and small donors that the Obama campaign reached out for a real social movement. <em>Not hardly.</em></p><p>"We" thought that the marginalized and irregular voters who came out for the first time (or in a very long time) got religion. <em>Not really.</em></p><p>"We" thought that it was finally "our" time. <em>Not yet.</em></p><p>So, who exactly is this "we"? Well, whomever "we" is, we will need to change how we define "we" and what "we" are truly about. Because if ever there was a time to get the message, it is now.</p><p>With (at least) three years of almost certain Beltway gridlock, the time is now (but should've been yesterday) to reclaim our communities and the power in them and between them that too many of "us" have overlooked for the presidential panacea that never was.</p><p>This is the lesson we should've learned from Dr. King's short time on this earth. And we should've ingrained this lesson into the hearts and minds of each successive generation -- on every MLK Day and every day in between. The power resides in the people, not the political parties that neither reflect nor direct us.</p><p>If "we" truly believe in the change that Obama stood for as validated by his humble beginnings as a community organizer, than "we" need to go back to the source of that power and support and join the community organizers who never left their communities or dared to think that even a president with community organizing credentials could be a proxy for the grassroots work at the heart of what makes America truly great.</p><p>Can "we" do it in the wake of this filibuster-ending defeat?</p><p>"Yes, we can!" Or perhaps, more emphatically: "Yes, we damn well better!"</p>]]></content:encoded><description>Many Democrats are stunned that "we" lost Massachusetts.

We shouldn't be.

"We" were complacent.

"We" were arrogant.

"We" learned the wrong lessons from Obama's victory just over a year ago.
</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/01/massachusetts-teaches-us-a-lesson-we-shouldnt-have-had-to-learn-this-way.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Haitian Ambassador to the U.S. Raymond Joseph responds to senile televangelist Pat Robertson's racist ramblings</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/qM3dVsdL73E/haitian-ambassador-to-the-us-raymond-joseph-responds-to-senile-televangelist-pat-robertsons-racist-r.html</link><category>Current Affairs</category><category>International Affairs</category><category>Media/Technology</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>disaster</category><category>earthquake</category><category>Haiti</category><category>Louisiana Purchase</category><category>Napoleon</category><category>Pat Robertson</category><category>Raymond Joseph</category><category>relief</category><category>Yele</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:24:48 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a7d0b669970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876d31a2d970c-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="AmbassadorJoseph1" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876d31a2d970c " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876d31a2d970c-120wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;"></img></a> Responding to Pat Robertson's <a href="http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/01/afronetizens-supports-y%C3%A9leorg-for-haiti-earthquake-relief.html" target="_blank" title="Robertson's racist ramblings">racist assertion</a> that Haiti won its freedom as the modern world's first independent Black nation as the result of making a "pact with the devil", Haiti's Ambassador to the U.S. Raymond Joseph stated on <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/" target="_blank" title="The Rachel Maddow Show">The Rachel Maddow Show</a> that if Haiti's liberation was "a curse", it was a curse that greatly benefited the United States.</p><p>Paraphrasing Ambassador Joseph (with the help of Wikipedia's entry on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisiana_Purchase" target="_blank" title="Wikipedia: Louisiana Purchase">Louisiana Purchase</a>), the ambassador deftly pointed out that the successful liberation of Haiti by its largely enslaved African-descended people caused Napoleon to lose its significant sugar exports rendering the former colony and the Louisiana territory strategically and monetarily inconsequential to him.</p><p>So, as a direct result of the successful uprising in (then) Saint-Domingue and the sale of the Louisiana Territory to the young United States, our country double in size for $15 million (or ~$.03/acre) in 1803. This massive acquisition of land from France just over 200 years ago gave us the modern-day states of . . .</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkansas" title="Arkansas"><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876d31a86970c-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="US-LouisianaPurchaseMap" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876d31a86970c " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876d31a86970c-320wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;"></img></a> "Arkansas</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri" title="Missouri">Missouri</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iowa" title="Iowa">Iowa</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma" title="Oklahoma">Oklahoma</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas" title="Kansas">Kansas</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebraska" title="Nebraska">Nebraska</a>, parts of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota" title="Minnesota">Minnesota</a> that were west of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mississippi_River" title="Mississippi River">Mississippi River</a>, most of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Dakota" title="North Dakota">North Dakota</a>, nearly all of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota" title="South Dakota">South Dakota</a>, northeastern <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Mexico" title="New Mexico">New Mexico</a>, the portions of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montana" title="Montana">Montana</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wyoming" title="Wyoming">Wyoming</a>, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado" title="Colorado">Colorado</a> east of the <a class="mw-redirect" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_Divide" title="Continental Divide">Continental Divide</a>, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisiana" title="Louisiana">Louisiana</a> west of the Mississippi River, including the city of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Orleans" title="New Orleans">New Orleans."</a></p><p>So, thank you, Ayiti!</p><p>May you rise from the ashes yet again with liberty, justice, and democracy for all.</p><p>Again, to donate to the earthquake relief aid in Haiti, please <strong>text 501501</strong> and $5 will go to the Yéle Relief Fund, or go <a href="http://www.yele.org" target="_blank" title="Yele">here</a> to support Yele.org.</p>]]></content:encoded><description>So, as a direct result of the successful uprising in (then) Saint-Domingue and the sale of the Louisiana Territory to the young United States, our country double in size for $15 million (or ~$.03/acre) in 1803.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/01/haitian-ambassador-to-the-us-raymond-joseph-responds-to-senile-televangelist-pat-robertsons-racist-r.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Afro-Netizen's supports Yéle.org for Haiti earthquake relief</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/Y-hamINsS6g/afronetizens-supports-y%C3%A9leorg-for-haiti-earthquake-relief.html</link><category>African Diaspora (non-US)</category><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>Current Affairs</category><category>International Affairs</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>aid</category><category>crisis</category><category>disaster</category><category>donations</category><category>earthquake</category><category>Haiti</category><category>Haitian</category><category>Pat Robertson</category><category>racism</category><category>relief</category><category>Yele</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:47:52 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876d19278970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Please <strong>text 501501</strong> to donate $5 for Haitian relief efforts or donate more <a href="http://www.yele.org" target="_blank" title="Yele">here</a>.</p><p>Afro-Netizen recommends making an ongoing commitment at a level you can afford. Mainstream media will move on to the next thing in a matter of days. So, before this crisis gets overshadowed by the Tea Party or Tiger Woods, Part II, Afro-Netizen strongly urges you to set up an automated, recurring donation throughout the year (or longer) so that even if you no longer actively follow this tragic story, your money will.</p>

<p>By the way, tele-racist <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201001130024" target="_blank" title="Pat Robertson calls Haiti &quot;cursed&quot;">Pat Robertson</a> believes God has cursed Haitians for being the first Black nation to throw off the yoke of colonization. Let's defy his bigotry with our generosity in this time of crisis.</p>

<p>

<object height="260" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/player.swf"></param><param name="flashvars" value="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg2?id=201001130024"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="allownetworking" value="all"></param><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg2?id=201001130024" height="260" src="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="320"></embed></object></p>

<p>[<strong>H/T</strong> to <a href="http://www.mediamattersforamerica.org" target="_blank" title="Robertson's &quot;true story&quot;: Haiti &quot;swore a pact to the devil&quot; to get &quot;free from the French&quot; and &quot;ever since they have been cursed&quot;">MediaMattersForAmerica</a>]
</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Afro-Netizen encourages all to support Haitian earthquake relief efforts by texting 501501 to donate $5 or donate at http://www.yele.org.</description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/wYgwxl0FrgA/player.swf" fileSize="52293" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Afro-Netizen encourages all to support Haitian earthquake relief efforts by texting 501501 to donate $5 or donate at http://www.yele.org.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Afro-Netizen encourages all to support Haitian earthquake relief efforts by texting 501501 to donate $5 or donate at http://www.yele.org.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/01/afronetizens-supports-y%C3%A9leorg-for-haiti-earthquake-relief.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/wYgwxl0FrgA/player.swf" length="52293" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/player.swf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>Proof for my liberal peers that "color-blindness" is a bad thing (or "Hewlett Packard doesn't care about black people!") (VIDEO)</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/RO0Vw5VuNNA/proof-for-my-liberal-peers-that-colorblindness-is-a-bad-thing-or-hewlett-packard-doesnt-care-about-b.html</link><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>Etcetera</category><category>Humor/Satire</category><category>Media/Technology</category><category>Web/Tech</category><category>African Americans</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>Blacks</category><category>color-blind</category><category>HP</category><category>invisibility</category><category>Kanye West</category><category>race</category><category>racist</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:48:08 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876b1faf3970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>[H/T to <a href="http://www.triptronix.net/ishbadiddle/" target="_blank" title="IshBadiddle">IshBadiddle</a> for the heads-up via <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/12/21/hp-face-tracking/" target="_blank" title="HP’s Facial Tracking Software Fails to Recognize African American">Mashable.com</a>]</p>

<p>When my White liberal colleagues who have drunk the Web-is-color-blind Kool-Aid, and rant quixotic about the transcendent power of technology as the great equalizer, what praytell do they think about this . . . ?</p>

<p></p>

<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t4DT3tQqgRM&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t4DT3tQqgRM&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425"></embed></object>

<p></p><p>

This seems like a perfect 21st century example of the continuing harm of racial invisibility. Next time you think about spouting "color-blindness" as a good thing, watch this video again. </p><p>Just like the well-meaning people who think this is a laudable goal or quality in people, the HP techs who're responsible for this glitch probably didn't mean to develop the software to discriminate against dark-skinned people. Nevertheless, the result is the same isn't? </p><p>
Invisibility sucks, people. </p><p>In fact, I'm pretty sure there was a pretty important piece of literature written on this very topic back in 1947. Now, what was <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=YpTA74jz018C&amp;dq=Invisible+Man+Ellison&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;source=bn&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=nlhFS--TM4SOlQfurLgM&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=4&amp;ved=0CCMQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false" target="_blank" title="Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison">that book</a> called? </p><p>What do you think?</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>"Hewlett Packard doesn't care about black people!"

</description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/hRzQAIKQPhM/t4DT3tQqgRM&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" fileSize="1026" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>"Hewlett Packard doesn't care about black people!" </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>"Hewlett Packard doesn't care about black people!" </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2010/01/proof-for-my-liberal-peers-that-colorblindness-is-a-bad-thing-or-hewlett-packard-doesnt-care-about-b.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/hRzQAIKQPhM/t4DT3tQqgRM&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" length="1026" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.youtube.com/v/t4DT3tQqgRM&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>Tiger Woods' choice of paramours: "Catch a tiger by the . . ."</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/UpQlUHJtMF8/tiger-woods-choice-of-paramours-catch-a-tiger-by-the-.html</link><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>Current Affairs</category><category>Family</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Sports</category><category>Blacks</category><category>blasian</category><category>cablinasian</category><category>cheating</category><category>golfing</category><category>infidelity</category><category>interracial</category><category>lynching</category><category>multiracial</category><category>paramours</category><category>post-racial</category><category>role model</category><category>sports</category><category>stereotypes</category><category>Tiger Woods</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:40:42 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a7432177970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>By <a href="http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/04/living-well-with-lupus-my-journey-.html" target="_blank" title="Living well with lupus: One woman's journey">Imani Perry</a></strong>

<p><strong>Guest Contributor</strong><br>
</p>

<p></p><p>It's the elephant in the room. </p>


<p><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876463cab970c-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="5TigerLovers" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876463cab970c " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876463cab970c-500wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px; width: 191px; height: 218px;"></img></a> Almost all of Tiger Wood’s rumored infidelities are with white
women. No one is saying it, but everyone is showing it, by repeatedly
displaying the multiple images of the multiple women. “Tiger likes
white women”  can be “said” without being “said.” Journalists don’t
want to say it because we aren’t supposed to care what color a person’s
partners are anymore. But of course we sill care and the journalists
know that!<br>
</p>

<p>Tiger Woods is an interesting personality when it comes to race. He
was lauded by some and treated with skepticism by others for his
insistent refusal to identify as “just black.” He vigorously claimed
his multiracial heritage. He famously told Oprah the name he had given
himself “Cablinasian” a designation so individual so as to make it not
a reference to a group, but just to himself. Tiger was "post-racial"
before post-racial was cool.<br>
</p>

<p>So, what are we to make of this racial performance? It is a show so
old that even thinking about it is exhausting.  Americans fear of and
fascination with the idea of Black men having sexual desire for white
women has a long and miserable history in the United States. It is tied
to lynching. It is tied to sexism and racism at the same time. It is
tied to stereotypes of black hyper-sexuality and  animalistic lust. It
is tied to the fall from grace of more than one public figure.</p>

<p><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876463a73970c-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="3TigerLovers" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876463a73970c " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef012876463a73970c-500wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px; width: 315px; height: 140px;"></img></a>One way of interpreting this media spectacle is to consider how
Tiger’s infidelities might be seen in certain quarters as evidence that
no matter how assimilated and clean cut a black man might seem, there
is always the danger that underneath it all he is little more than a
walking stereotype. That is what the always incendiary Rush Limbaugh
has said about the Tiger Woods affair(s). This is a particularly
dramatic moment for such an image to come to the fore of American
culture, right as the  country’s collective love affair with President
Obama is increasingly strained over the war, the recession, and health
reform.<br>
</p>

<p>Given how frequently Americans have fallen out of love with a black
hero, and how often it has been through the association of said heroes
with stereotypes, we have to wonder if Barack Obama, a politician who
was called “The Tiger Woods” of politics by some, is suffering from
some questions about whether his “true colors” are going to show. After
all, gossip rags have been running stories claiming that Obama has a
secret white female or male lover. It Is hard to imagine such stories
having truth, given the eager mudslinging in Washington, it would have
been quite a feat to prevent evidence of such affairs from leaking. I
think the rumors say more about our latent fears than any reality.<br>
</p>

<p>But with respect to the Tiger Woods fiasco on the other hand, there
is very good evidence supporting the claim that he was not only a
cheater, but a sloppy one. His indiscretion reveals either naivete,
stupidity or a delusional sense of his power over the women with whom
he was involved. And  I think, without getting into the mind and heart
of Tiger Woods, the parade of women, the parade of white women, if
nothing else says, we are far from post racial.<br>
</p>

<p>A man who identifies as a member of three non-white racial groups, but
appears to have little to no sexual desire (and who appears to act on
his every sexual desire) for women of any of those non-white racial
groups is a product of history whether he likes it or not. From the
18th through mid 20th century, standards of idealized white beauty were
promulgated around the world, and those standards of beauty reflected
the ideology of white supremacy that was used to justify the domination
and exploitation of non-white people. </p><p>We live with the residue of that
history in our ongoing beauty cultures and ideals, not just in the
United States but in many places around the world.  Even though
individual women of color have become beauty icons, the normative ideal
remains white and blonde and blue-eyed. I am sure some readers will
respond, “Tiger just has a type, it isn’t racial.” Well, with the
exception of two who look like his wife, all of the women actually look
very different. What unifies them is their race. That’s his type: white.<br>
</p>

<p>(There is the one counter example of Jaimee Grubbs, a  half Native
American woman who claims to have had an affair with Woods. Grubbs grew
up on a Colville Indian Reservation, and reportedly has given
interviews in which she has shared her racist stereotypes about, and
disaffection for Native Americans. But I digress.)<br>
</p>

<p>That said, I would never suggest that Tiger Woods has any obligation
to display any racial loyalty to any of the racial groups to which he
belongs.  I think those politics are not useful. Performing loyalty
when it isn’t felt, is both sad and lacks meaning. Nor do I think
loyalty is necessarily displayed through sexual partnerships. There are
many people who have been of service to their communities while
partnering interracially and many who have partnered with people of
their group and been a destructive force within that group. <br>
</p>

<p>Tiger Woods has and should continue to be with women he finds
attractive (although ideally without the lying and cheating). But our
collective fascination with that collective of women, and his own
fascination with them, is yet another sign that our racial past
continues to impact our racial present.</p>

<p><em><br>
</em></p>

<p><em><a href="http://www.princeton.edu/africanamericanstudies/people/faculty/core/#comp0000483e386400000002fd1e93" target="_blank" title="Imani Perry bio">Imani Perry</a>, PhD, JD is an <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=ntt_athr_dp_sr_2?_encoding=UTF8&amp;sort=relevancerank&amp;search-alias=books&amp;field-author=Imani%20Perry" target="_blank" title="Peruse her writings at Amazon.com">author</a> and professor at Princeton University's Center for African American Studies (CAAS).</em></p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>So, what are we to make of [Tiger Woods'] racial performance? It is a show so old that even thinking about it is exhausting.  Americans fear of and fascination with the idea of Black men having sexual desire for white women has a long and miserable history in the United States. It is tied to lynching. It is tied to sexism and racism at the same time. It is tied to stereotypes of black hyper-sexuality and  animalistic lust. It is tied to the fall from grace of more than one public figure.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/12/tiger-woods-choice-of-paramours-catch-a-tiger-by-the-.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Murdoch dodges the question, again: does he think Obama is a racist?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/DwdFi8qKVAk/murdoch-dodges-the-question-again-does-he-think-obama-is-a-racist.html</link><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>ObamaWatch</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Color of Change</category><category>ColorOfChange</category><category>Fox News</category><category>Glenn Beck</category><category>netroots</category><category>News Corp</category><category>race-baiting</category><category>racism</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:09:32 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6fe0ba1970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>A few weeks ago, Rupert Murdoch <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsboAwzj7aY">said that Glenn Beck was right</a> when he called Obama a racist, and since then he has been dodging questions about what exactly he meant. Through one of his staff, Murdoch <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/1109/Murdoch_doesnt_consider_Obama_racist_Spox.html">issued a brief statement</a> saying that he doesn't believe Obama is a racist, but not explaining what he meant when he said he agreed with Beck. I wrote Murdoch <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-rucker/colorofchange-to-murdoch_b_352125.html">an open letter</a> asking for an explanation, and more than 135,000 people have signed petitions to Murdoch with the same message: Murdoch should either say clearly that he meant what he said and that he stands by Beck; or he should acknowledge there's a problem with what Beck said and take responsibility for stopping the continued race-baiting at News Corp and Fox. But Murdoch has refused to respond.

</p>

<p>Yesterday, Rupert Murdoch spoke at the Federal Trade Commission as part of a conference on the future of journalism. ColorOfChange organizers and others in the audience confronted Murdoch about his comments and asked for an explanation, but as you can see, Murdoch made a quick, silent exit:

</p>

<p><object height="340" width="560"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/13RNSf46Yi8&hl=en_US&fs=1&"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/13RNSf46Yi8&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="340" width="560"></object>

</p>

<p>This is the second time that Murdoch has dodged this question when confronted; last time it was Media Matters that asked him:

</p>

<p><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2asuhhx-AME&hl=en_US&fs=1&"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2asuhhx-AME&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="344" width="425"></object>

</p>

<p>Murdoch doesn't want to stand by his comments -- he clearly sees that he made a mistake in publicly admitting that he agrees with Glenn Beck's race-baiting. But he also refuses to disown them. 

</p>

<p>Of course Murdoch is ultimately responsible for what occurs in the media he controls. Every time Murdoch dodges this question, it helps illustrate a fact that should already be obvious, and should follow him everywhere he goes: the divisive, dangerous race-baiting on his cable network exists because he allows it to, and apparently because he agrees with it.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>A few weeks ago, Rupert Murdoch said that Glenn Beck was right when he called Obama a racist, and since then he has been dodging questions about what exactly he meant. Through one of his staff, Murdoch issued a brief statement saying that he doesn't believe Obama is a racist, but not explaining what he meant when he said he agreed with Beck. I wrote Murdoch an open letter asking for an explanation, and more than 135,000 people have signed petitions to Murdoch with the same message: Murdoch should either say clearly that he meant what he said and that he stands by Beck; or he should acknowledge there's a problem with what Beck said and take responsibility for stopping the continued race-baiting at News Corp and Fox. But Murdoch has refused to respond. </description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/QuSqMhROkak/13RNSf46Yi8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" fileSize="1029" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>A few weeks ago, Rupert Murdoch said that Glenn Beck was right when he called Obama a racist, and since then he has been dodging questions about what exactly he meant. Through one of his staff, Murdoch issued a brief statement saying that he doesn't belie</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>A few weeks ago, Rupert Murdoch said that Glenn Beck was right when he called Obama a racist, and since then he has been dodging questions about what exactly he meant. Through one of his staff, Murdoch issued a brief statement saying that he doesn't believe Obama is a racist, but not explaining what he meant when he said he agreed with Beck. I wrote Murdoch an open letter asking for an explanation, and more than 135,000 people have signed petitions to Murdoch with the same message: Murdoch should either say clearly that he meant what he said and that he stands by Beck; or he should acknowledge there's a problem with what Beck said and take responsibility for stopping the continued race-baiting at News Corp and Fox. But Murdoch has refused to respond. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/12/murdoch-dodges-the-question-again-does-he-think-obama-is-a-racist.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/QuSqMhROkak/13RNSf46Yi8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" length="1029" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.youtube.com/v/13RNSf46Yi8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>Harlem Gospel Choir says no to Glenn Beck</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/LpRWgOZI57A/harlem-gospel-choir-says-no-to-glenn-beck.html</link><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>The Arts</category><category>Youth/Children</category><category>Color of Change</category><category>ColorOfChange.org</category><category>Fox News</category><category>Glenn Beck</category><category>Harlem</category><category>Harlem Gospel Choir</category><category>Race-Baiting</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:31:57 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6f6f2a9970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The Harlem Gospel Choir just <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2009/12/01/2009-12-01_gospel_truth_for_glenn_harlem_choir_cancels_movie_role_over_finances_not_politic.html">canceled their performance as part of Glenn Beck's "The Christmas Sweater,"</a> a live performance that's scheduled to be broadcast in movie theaters across the country this Thursday.

</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6f7d144970b-popup" onclick="window.open(this.href,'_blank','scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="Harlem Boys Choir" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6f7d144970b " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6f7d144970b-120wi" style="border: 2px solid black; margin: 3px;" title="Harlem Boys Choir"></img></a> The Harlem Gospel Choir has backed out of a holiday performance with controversial conservative talk-show host Glenn Beck, the Daily News has learned.

</p><p>The famous choir, which has performed for Nelson Mandela and Pope John Paul II, was set to appear in the simulcast film of Beck's novel "The Christmas Sweater - A Return to Redemption," which opens Thursday in theaters nationwide.

</p><p>The choir canceled the appearance Monday, citing financial reasons.

</p><p>James Rucker, executive director of Color for Change - which has helped persuade more than 80 advertisers to ditch Beck's show - said the group did an about-face after he called the choir.

</p><p>"We wanted to make sure they understood who Beck was," Rucker said. "We believe their mission is about spreading the Gospel and and promoting harmony, and we thought Beck was the antithesis of that."
</p></blockquote>


<p>Before we contacted the Harlem Gospel Choir about Beck, they didn't know much about him. After learning more about Beck and his history of race-baiting, the choir quickly came to the right decision and cancelled their appearance with him.

</p><p>The choir told the Daily News that their reasons for canceling with Beck were financial, and it's understandable that they would want to avoid getting involved in what could be seen as a political fight -- the choir is about faith and music, not politics. And it's hard to blame them for wanting to avoid starting a fight with Glenn Beck -- he is a powerful man with a large megaphone and a large audience that includes some very hateful people (based on some of the email we've received after launching our campaign against Beck, we know this first-hand at ColorOfChange).

</p><p>"The Christmas Sweater" is part of Beck's effort to present himself as someone who represents mainstream American values. His desire to work with the Harlem Gospel Choir serves that goal, and it would have helped him position himself as embracing Black people while his rhetoric works against the interests of not only Black folks but most Americans.

</p><p>That's what makes the Harlem Gospel Choir's refusal to perform with Beck so important -- they are world-famous for spreading a message of peace, love, unity and respect. They've performed for Nelson Mandela, in honor of Dr. King, and before Pope John Paul II. They have proudly represented one of Black America's oldest musical traditions around the world, and now they have refused to allow their name and their legacy to be used by someone like Glenn Beck.</p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>"We wanted to make sure they understood who Beck was," Rucker said. "We believe their mission is about spreading the Gospel and and promoting harmony, and we thought Beck was the antithesis of that." </description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/12/harlem-gospel-choir-says-no-to-glenn-beck.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>We must not let Big Telecom segregate the Internet</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/BHTMLzZn5sU/the-internet-must-not-become-a-segregated-online-community.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>Media Reform</category><category>Media/Technology</category><category>Net Neutrality</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Publisher's blog</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Web/Tech</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>AT&amp;T</category><category>broadband</category><category>broadcast</category><category>Center for Media Justice</category><category>Chris Rabb</category><category>civil rights</category><category>Comcast</category><category>digital divide</category><category>FCC</category><category>Free Press</category><category>Glenn Beck</category><category>Internet freedom</category><category>ISPs</category><category>LULAC</category><category>media consolidation</category><category>media justice</category><category>media ownership</category><category>media reform</category><category>NAACP</category><category>NABJ</category><category>NAHJ</category><category>net neutrality</category><category>netizens</category><category>network neutrality</category><category>Open Internet Coalition</category><category>segregation</category><category>separate but equal</category><category>social change</category><category>social justice</category><category>Verizon</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:08:39 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef012875f5d81a970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>By Malkia Cyril, <a href="http://www.chrisrabb.com" target="_blank" title="ChrisRabb.com">Chris Rabb</a> and Joseph Torres</strong></p><p><strong><em style="font-family: Arial;">Originally published on <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/malkia-a-cyril/the-internet-must-not-bec_b_375942.html" target="_blank" title="The Huffington Post">The Huffington Post</a> and cross-posted <a href="http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=Internet+Segregated+Internet+Freedom+Net+Neutrality+Malkia+Torres+Rabb&amp;btnG=Search+Blogs" target="_blank" title="Google search">elsewhere</a></em><br></strong></p><p>When Fox News’ Glenn Beck called President Barack Obama a racist this past July, the online advocacy group <a href="http://www.ColorOfChange.org" target="_blank" title="ColorOfChange.org">ColorOfChange.org</a> launched a <a href="http://colorofchange.org/beck/" target="_blank" title="Anti-Beck CoC campaign">campaign</a> to convince advertisers to boycott the show. To date, some 280,000 people have joined the effort, and more than 60 companies have pulled their ads.</p>CNN parted ways with Lou Dobbs last month after civil rights groups and <a href="http://www.presente.org" target="_blank" title="Presente.org">Presente.org</a> mobilized thousands of Latinos online to call on CNN to <a href="http://bastadobbs.com/who/" target="_blank" title="BastaDobbs.com">dump the talk show host</a> for spewing hate against immigrants for years.<br><p>None of this — not these advocacy efforts, not countless small business success stories, not even the election of President Barack Obama — would have happened without a <a href="http://www.openinternetcoalition.org/index.cfm?objectID=69276766-1D09-317F-BBF53036A246B403" target="_blank" title="OIC letter to the FCC chair">free and open Internet</a>. For communities of color, the Internet provides us with a unique opportunity to speak for ourselves without first seeking the approval of gatekeepers or having to secure major funds to do so. But the big telecommunications companies like AT&amp;T, Verizon and Comcast want to create an effectively segregated online community where they will act as our gatekeepers.</p><p></p><div style="text-align: center; font-family: Palatino;"><p><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><em>[T]he big telecommunications companies <br></em></span></p>

<p><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><em>like AT&amp;T, Verizon and Comcast <br></em></span></p>

<p><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><em>want to create an effectively segregated online community <br></em></span></p>

<p><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><em>where they
will act as our gatekeepers.</em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><em><br></em></span></p></div><p>The Federal Communications Commission (<a href="http://www.fcc.gov" target="_blank" title="FCC">FCC</a>) is now considering new rules that could protect the fundamental principle of “Network Neutrality” once and for all. Net Neutrality prohibits Internet service providers (ISPs) from blocking, discriminating against or deterring Internet users from accessing online content and applications of their choice — such as e-newsletters, blogs, social networking sites, online videos, podcasts and smart-phone apps. It is not that network owners are secretly plotting to stifle free speech – at least not usually.  But they have an undeniable, rational interest in creating a pay-for-play model for the treatment of communication on the Internet.  Commercial websites that pay will get speed and quality and the non-commercial uses of the Net will be collateral damage – relegated to the slow lane.  It’s not necessarily that they want to block our speech for political reasons; it’s that our speech is not important to them because it’s not going to make them money.</p><p></p><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><em><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"></span></span></span></span></span></span></em></span><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"></span></span></span><em><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf; font-family: Palatino;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 25px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;">Many of the most valuable things we do online <br></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></em></p><p style="text-align: center;"><em><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf; font-family: Palatino;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 25px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;">are non-commercial; they
exist because the Internet is <br></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></em></p><p style="text-align: center;"><em><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf; font-family: Palatino;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 25px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;">the first mass media system with no
gatekeepers <br></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></em></p><p style="text-align: center;"><em><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf; font-family: Palatino;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 25px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;">to dole out privilege to the highest bidder.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></em></p>

<p><em><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf; font-family: Palatino;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 25px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></em></p><p>The Internet provides our communities with a medium to access services, find jobs, connect to friends, make inexpensive international phone calls to family members, and to advocate for social change.  Many of the most valuable things we do online are non-commercial; they exist because the Internet is the first mass media system with no gatekeepers to dole out privilege to the highest bidder. That freedom and openness is what makes the Internet different from broadcasting and cable.  It makes it valuable to our communities.  We can’t allow Comcast, AT&amp;T, Verizon and other broadband providers to deliver substandard Internet service to our communities.</p><div style="text-align: left;"><br><strong>Telecom Companies Want to Create Second-Class “Netizens”</strong><br></div><p>But the big phone and cable companies want to get rid of Net Neutrality and control how the public accesses the Internet. These companies want to charge websites extra tolls to secure the fastest speeds online, while favoring their own content and services over their competition’s. Those unable to pay will be banished to the slow lane online, becoming second-class “<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netizen" target="_blank" title="Wikipedia: netizen">netizens</a>” without the same freedoms given to those with more money and influence.</p>

<p>This threat to Internet freedom isn’t hypothetical. Verizon got caught blocking text messages sent by the pro-choice group NARAL to its own members – though they backed down immediately under public pressure. Comcast has also illegally interfered with file-sharing on its network, a practice that earned them a rebuke from the FCC. </p><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef012875f7e534970c-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="OpenSecretsAT&amp;T" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef012875f7e534970c " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef012875f7e534970c-320wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px; width: 237px; height: 197px;"></img></a> Even though President Obama <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/10/29/obama-promises-to-reinsta_n_70317.html" target="_blank" title="Obama pledges Net neutrality laws if elected president">pledged</a> he would “take a back seat to no one” on Net Neutrality, the big phone and cable companies are pulling out all the stops to derail it, including deploying Karl Rove¬–style scare tactics within our communities and using their massive resources to block Obama’s agenda. In the first nine months of 2009, they employed nearly 500 <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2009/10/the-federal-communications-com.html" target="_blank" title="Open Secrets: Big Donors Ramp Up to Fight FCC Net Neutrality Decision">lobbyists</a> and spent some $74 million to influence Congress and the FCC. Their misinformation has even <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200910210026" target="_blank" title="Media Matters: Beck through the looking glass: smears net neutrality as a Marxist plot to take over the Internet.">convinced Glenn Beck</a> that Net Neutrality is an attempt by President Obama to take over the Internet.<br>

<object height="260" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/player.swf"></param><param name="flashvars" value="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg2?id=200910210026"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="allownetworking" value="all"></param><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg2?id=200910210026" height="260" src="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="320"></embed></object>

<p>Who will protect the online rights of marginalized communities against the raw profit motive of big business? We urge leaders in our community not to yield to the underhanded scare tactics that corporations like <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000000076" target="_blank" title="OpenSecrets.org's Heavy Hitters: AT&amp;T Inc">AT&amp;T</a> have used on our communities. </p><strong>We Must Reject a Separate but Unequal Online World <br></strong><p>One of those scare tactics is the claim, pushed by phone and cable companies, that Network Neutrality poses a threat to digital inclusion. Nothing could be further from the truth. Not only does Net Neutrality expand media diversity and access by ensuring fairness and nondiscrimination by big corporations, it will prevent the kind of media consolidation that has happened in the broadcast industry by helping our communities develop a diversity of civic and commercial online enterprises on a scale that represents our growing online numbers.</p>

<div style="text-align: center;"><p><span style="font-size: 24px; font-family: Palatino; color: #0000bf;"><em>It’s not necessarily that they want to block our speech for political
reasons; <br></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 24px; font-family: Palatino; color: #0000bf;"><em>it’s that our speech is not important to them <br></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 24px; font-family: Palatino; color: #0000bf;"><em>because it’s not
going to make them money.</em></span></p></div><p>A primary reason for the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_divideq" target="_blank" title="Wikipedia: &quot;digital divide&quot;">digital divide</a> is that the cost of fully engaging in the online world is just too expensive for many in our community. Broadband in the United States is among the slowest but most expensive of any industrialized nation. After years of consolidation, the largest telecom companies have gotten away with price-gouging our communities because of a lack of competition in the broadband market. More choices for broadband service – not permitting more discrimination – are the key to bringing down costs.  <strong>Scrapping Net Neutrality in order to consolidate control over the Internet by cable and phone companies is not the answer. More market control won’t give them more incentive to sell low-cost high-quality services to low-income communities.</strong>  Our communities will still be subject to the same business case that have marginalized us in the first place –households that don’t have a lot of money to spend.  Shareholders aren’t charities, and we are foolish to expect otherwise.  </p>

<p>But more importantly, we should not be sacrificing an open Internet to bribe phone and cable companies not to practice forms of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redlining" target="_blank" title="Wikipedia: redlining">red-lining</a>.  The answer to the digital divide cannot be to deliver a second-class, closed Internet to our communities.  </p>

<p>The historic fight against discrimination by groups like the <a href="http://www.naacp.org/" target="_blank" title="NAACP">NAACP</a> and the <a href="http://www.lulac.org/about/" target="_blank" title="About LULAC">League of United Latin American Citizens</a> has led to great societal change, laying the groundwork for the election of a president of color. We urge our colleagues in the civil rights community to fight with us to ensure that telecom and cable companies are not allowed to discriminate against our communities or interfere with our capacity to speak for ourselves without first asking AT&amp;T, Verizon or Comcast for permission. </p>

<p>Several civil rights groups have spoken out in favor of passing Net Neutrality regulations, including the <a href="http://www.nhmc.org/e-news/?id=72" target="_blank" title="NHMC Supports Network Neutrality">National Hispanic Media Coalition</a>, <a href="http://www.unityjournalists.org/mediapolicy/index.php" target="_blank" title="UNITY: Journalists of Color believes that Net Neutrality is fundamental to maintaining a free flow of ideas and vibrant democracy on the Internet.">UNITY: Journalists of Color</a>, and <a href="http://www.colorofchange.org" target="_blank" title="ColorOfChange.org">ColorOfChange.org</a>.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center;"><em><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Palatino; color: #0000bf;"><span style="color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 15px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;">[W]e should not be sacrificing an open Internet <br></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></em></p><p style="text-align: center;"><em><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Palatino; color: #0000bf;"><span style="color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 15px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; color: #0000bf;">to bribe phone and cable companies not to practice forms of red-lining.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></em></p>

<p></p><p>We are living through a critical moment in our nation’s history. The FCC is going to decide whether the Internet will remain an open platform that allows for the greatest number of voices to participate in our democratic society, or whether it will be a closed network controlled by the big telecom companies. </p>

<p>We are concerned about the dire consequences of living without Internet freedom. It would create a separate but unequal online world where our communities are unable to use the Internet to compete or to advocate for justice when we have been wronged. </p>

<p>We need civil rights, media justice, community-oriented and grassroots organizations to stand together to make sure effective Net Neutrality regulation will protect our communities from the predatory practices of the phone and cable industries.</p><p></p><div style="text-align: center;"><p><span style="font-size: 24px; font-family: Palatino; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; font-family: Palatino; color: #0000bf;"><em>[L]iving without Internet freedom . . . would create a separate but unequal
online world <br></em></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 24px; font-family: Palatino; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; font-family: Palatino; color: #0000bf;"><em>where our communities are unable to use the Internet <br></em></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 24px; font-family: Palatino; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; font-family: Palatino; color: #0000bf;"><em>to
compete or to advocate for justice <br></em></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 24px; font-family: Palatino; color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-size: 24px; font-family: Palatino; color: #0000bf;"><em>when we have been wronged.</em></span></span></p></div>

<p></p><p>As with past civil rights struggles that successfully expanded access, thwarted discrimination, destroyed legalized segregation, and created broad opportunity, so too will the cause for Internet freedom. </p>

<p><em><br></em></p>

<p><em>Malkia Cyril is the executive director of the <a href="http://centerformediajustice.org/home/about/" target="_blank" title="About CMJ">Center for Media Justice</a>. Chris Rabb is the founder of the online community Afro-Netizen and is a visiting researcher at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University. Joseph Torres is the government relations manager of <a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/stories" target="_blank" title="Save The Internet">Free Press</a> and former deputy director of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.</em></p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>We should not be sacrificing an open Internet to bribe phone and cable companies not to practice forms of red-lining.

We need civil rights, media justice, community-oriented and grassroots organizations to stand together to make sure effective Net Neutrality regulation will protect our communities from the predatory practices of the phone and cable industries.

As with past civil rights struggles that successfully expanded access, thwarted discrimination, destroyed legalized segregation, and created broad opportunity, so too will the cause for Internet freedom. </description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/wYgwxl0FrgA/player.swf" fileSize="52293" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>We should not be sacrificing an open Internet to bribe phone and cable companies not to practice forms of red-lining. We need civil rights, media justice, community-oriented and grassroots organizations to stand together to make sure effective Net Neutral</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>We should not be sacrificing an open Internet to bribe phone and cable companies not to practice forms of red-lining. We need civil rights, media justice, community-oriented and grassroots organizations to stand together to make sure effective Net Neutrality regulation will protect our communities from the predatory practices of the phone and cable industries. As with past civil rights struggles that successfully expanded access, thwarted discrimination, destroyed legalized segregation, and created broad opportunity, so too will the cause for Internet freedom. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/12/the-internet-must-not-become-a-segregated-online-community.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/wYgwxl0FrgA/player.swf" length="52293" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/player.swf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>ARC's Green Equity Toolkit: Advancing Race, Gender and Economic Equity in the Green Economy</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/xvLFGOLIVm4/arcs-green-equity-toolkit-advancing-race-gender-and-economic-equity-in-the-green-economy.html</link><category>Business &amp; Entrepreneurship</category><category>Community &amp; Consumer Activism</category><category>Economy/Finance</category><category>Environment</category><category>Labor/Employment</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>Applied Research Center</category><category>ARC</category><category>Chris Rabb</category><category>climate change</category><category>entrepreneurship</category><category>environment</category><category>gender</category><category>green business</category><category>green collar</category><category>green economy</category><category>green equity</category><category>green jobs</category><category>inner-cities</category><category>racial justice</category><category>social enterprise</category><category>toolkit</category><category>urban blight</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:30:00 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a66ee707970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ydy3I2RncWk&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ydy3I2RncWk&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></div>
]]></content:encoded><description></description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/b_ZMnJSt-08/Ydy3I2RncWk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" fileSize="1054" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/11/arcs-green-equity-toolkit-advancing-race-gender-and-economic-equity-in-the-green-economy.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/b_ZMnJSt-08/Ydy3I2RncWk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" length="1054" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.youtube.com/v/Ydy3I2RncWk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>Blogger Francis Holland reads the mind of Rep. Artur Davis (AL-D), the only CBC member to vote against the House's health insurance reform bill</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/-xscyU8Nd1M/blogger-francis-holland-reads-the-mind-of-rep-artur-davis-ald-the-only-cbc-member-to-vote-against-th.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Elections/Campaigns/Voting</category><category>Health</category><category>ObamaWatch</category><category>Politics</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>Alabama</category><category>Artur Davis</category><category>candidates</category><category>CBC</category><category>Congress</category><category>elections</category><category>Francis Holland</category><category>gubernatorial</category><category>health insurance reform</category><category>healthcare</category><category>legislation</category><category>Obama</category><category>politics</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:23:32 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a66eecd2970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; ">H/T</span></span></span></strong><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "> to Francis Holland for this bold </span></span></span><a href="http://francislholland.blogspot.com/2009/11/congressman-artur-davis-only-member-of.html" target="_blank" title="Read this witty blog entry by Francis Holland"><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; ">mind-reading</span></span></span></a><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "> experiment.</span></span></span></p><p><font size="4"><span style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px;"><br></span></font></p><p><img alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket" border="2" src="http://i242.photobucket.com/albums/ff131/francislholland2/ArturDavisGraphicFinal450mm-1.png" width="500"></img></p>]]></content:encoded><description>Francis Holland: The text in red above is NOT a quote but this is what I think Rep. Davis would tell us, if he could speak honestly on the subject.

I hate to drop a dime on Representative Artur Davis of Alabama's 7th Congressional District, which is 61.7% African American, but he voted against President Obama's national health care plan even though Black infant mortality is over 17% in the American South, and somebody has to put this into context.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/11/blogger-francis-holland-reads-the-mind-of-rep-artur-davis-ald-the-only-cbc-member-to-vote-against-th.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Prayer Cult Nation: Faith-healing scams &amp; healthcare reform</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/K3v6SBisOpw/prayer-cult-nation-faithhealing-scams-healthcare-reform.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Health</category><category>Politics</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Religion</category><category>Science</category><category>abortion</category><category>African-Americans</category><category>agnostic</category><category>atheism</category><category>Bible</category><category>Blacks</category><category>Christian Science</category><category>Christianity</category><category>Creationism</category><category>ethnocentrism</category><category>evangelism</category><category>faith-healing</category><category>healthcare reform</category><category>heathen</category><category>Mormon</category><category>pagan</category><category>public option</category><category>religious</category><category>Santeria</category><category>scripture</category><category>secular</category><category>Sikivu Hutchinson</category><category>Wiccan</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:47:00 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6ad3f6e970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;"><strong>By Sikivu Hutchinson</strong></p><p align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;"><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">Recently on a popular Black Entertainment Network talk show R&amp;B
singer Monica pitched her new reality show and extolled the virtues of prayer.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>Suited up in hip-high boots like an
emissary from God’s army, she credited God with guiding her through life and
imbuing her with purpose.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>His word
was her marching order, she proclaimed, as the rapt studio audience nodded in
approval, giving credence to surveys that indicate African Americans are more
religious, more likely to subscribe to Creationism and more apt to break out
the Bible for guidance and counsel than any other group in the U.S.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">Yet not since the Great Awakening of the 18<sup>th</sup>
Century has “God” spoken through so many American public figures so
unequivocally.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>The medievalist
Sarah Palin has risen to cult status touting her personal speed dial to the
Lord.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>The Old Testament God has become
the kamikaze co-pilot of the Republican Party.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">  </span>And President Barack Obama frequently invokes both God as an
adjudicating figure and prayer as an antidote to tragedy.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">Prayer has become the national bromide for generalized
suffering.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>If it can’t be
sanitized, domesticated and defanged by prayer then it isn’t worth
experiencing.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>Now, in the midst of
the healthcare reform morass, prayer healing “therapy” may become a legitimate
form of government subsidized medical treatment. <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>According to the <em>Los Angeles Times</em><span style="font-style:normal">, a “little known” provision in the health care overhaul
bill would authorize coverage for <a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-na-health-religion3-2009nov03,0,2239900.story" target="_blank" title="Christian Science prayer as a medical expense">Christian Science prayer as a medical expense</a>.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-style:normal"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes"></span>The provision is
sponsored by the ultra-conservative Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah and the liberal
Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
</span>This strange bedfellow pairing is part ideology and part political expedience.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>Hatch is a notorious Mormon ideologue
and Kerry’s state is the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Science" target="_blank" title="Wikipedia: Christian Science">Christian Science</a> Church’s base.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>Despite several high profile cases in
which religious fanatic parents have been convicted for using prayer healing to
“treat” their terminally ill children rather than seek medical treatment, the Senate
healthcare provision would sanction this practice.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">In a nation in which millions go bankrupt and/or die from not
having health care insurance the decision to include prayer healing into the insidiously
partisan healthcare deliberations is an outrage.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">  </span><span lang="EN" style="mso-ansi-language:EN">Increasingly,
prayer has wormed its way into the most mundane of American moments.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>Moments of prayer or “silence” have
become more commonplace during local government meetings, schools, social
functions and games.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>A recent AOL
poll surveying site users about a Southern school’s decision to post a message
to God received overwhelming support.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
</span>A majority of users agreed that reverence for God is part of “our”
nation’s heritage.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;"><span lang="EN" style="mso-ansi-language:EN"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes"></span>As more and more
Americans shrug in apathy at the leaky wall separating church and state, those
who abstain from or question these mass spiritual entreaties are viewed as
curmudgeon naysayers at best and un-American public enemies at worst.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>The explosion of public prayer—exemplified
by the near manic drive to enshrine the most simple of pursuits with Godly
sanction—seems to bespeak some deep-seated crisis of American selfhood which
afflicts all classes and ethnicities.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">According to the Christian Science Church, a faith healing internship
takes the form of an<span lang="EN" style="mso-ansi-language:EN"> “'intensive'
two-week class instruction in Christian Science healing” after which
practitioners “may take patients.”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> 
</span>Treatment “may rely on passages of the Bible…or may simply be a period
of silent communion.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>There is no
formula and ‘treatment’ can be given in absentia by telephone or email.” </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;"><span lang="EN" style="mso-ansi-language:EN">Since
Christian Science practitioners can hang up their virtual shingles after a
two-week crash course why can’t apostles of Frodo or oracles of Pan be
similarly credentialed?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span></span>Ethnocentric
bias has apparently banished Pentecostal snakes, Santeria chants, Wiccan spells
and animist rituals from consideration as insurable faith treatments.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>However, the Senate provision would
ultimately provide protection for so-called religious and spiritual healthcare,
opening the gate to all manner of medically dangerous, clinically unproven
treatments.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">Few on the Left have raised concerns about the contradiction
between conservatives’ draconian attempts to eliminate coverage for abortion (a
medically established and lifesaving practice) in the healthcare overhaul and
this obscure provision for government subsidized Christian Science hocus pocus.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>The House of Representatives’
deliberations on its version of the healthcare bill are being stalled by
endless wrangling over toughening restrictions on abortion coverage from <em>private</em><span style="font-style:normal"> healthcare companies that participate in a
government public option insurance “exchange.” <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>Under the current language these private plans could be purchased
by poor subscribers with the aid of government subsidies.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>Yet anti-abortion legislators are
jockeying to prevent private insurers that offer <a href="http://"><a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en&amp;q=abortion+healthcare+reform+legislation&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8" title="Google search: abortion healthcare reform legislation">abortion coverage</a></a> from even being
included in the public option.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">Perhaps poor women seeking reproductive healthcare would be advised
to submit an email request for God’s intervention to their nearest Christian
Science provider, courtesy of the federal government.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">  </span>In the only democratic nation in the postindustrial world that
doesn’t have equitable government healthcare the watchwords will be “let them
have prayer.”</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;"></p><p style="text-align: left;"><span lang="EN"><strong><em>Sikivu Hutchinson is the editor
of <a href="http://www.BlackFemLens.org" target="_blank" title="BlackFemLens.org">BlackFemLens.org</a> and a commentator for KPFK 90.7 FM.</em></strong></span></p></div>]]></content:encoded><description>Few on the Left have raised concerns about the contradiction between conservatives’ draconian attempts to eliminate coverage for abortion (a medically established and lifesaving practice) in the healthcare overhaul and this obscure provision for government subsidized Christian Science hocus pocus.  The House of Representatives’ deliberations on its version of the healthcare bill are being stalled by endless wrangling over toughening restrictions on abortion coverage from private healthcare companies that participate in a government public option insurance “exchange.”  Under the current language these private plans could be purchased by poor subscribers with the aid of government subsidies.  Yet anti-abortion legislators are jockeying to prevent private insurers that offer abortion coverage from even being included in the public option.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/11/prayer-cult-nation-faithhealing-scams-healthcare-reform.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Haunting movie "Precious" portrays the Black matriarch as villain</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/2CsAzjdtjh8/precious-portrays-the-black-matriarch-as-villain.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Family</category><category>Media/Technology</category><category>Parenting</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>The Arts</category><category>Youth/Children</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>cinema</category><category>ColorLines</category><category>film</category><category>Harlem</category><category>Hollywood</category><category>Lee Daniels</category><category>Mo'Nique</category><category>movies</category><category>poverty</category><category>Precious</category><category>racism</category><category>rape</category><category>sexism</category><category>sexual abuse</category><category>Sidibe</category><category>structural inequality</category><category>teen pregnancy</category><category>Tyler Perry</category><category>welfare</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:46:59 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6ad2e0d970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, geneva, sans; font-size: medium; line-height: normal; color: #666666; "><p class="article_story_title" style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, tahoma, sans; font-size: 22px; line-height: 24px; font-weight: bold; margin-top: 8px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: #000000; ">The Black Matriarch as Villain</p><p class="cover_story_byline" style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, tahoma, sans; font-size: 12px; line-height: 16px; font-weight: normal; margin-top: 3px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: #000000; ">By <strong>Juell Stewart</strong></p><p class="cover_story_byline" style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, tahoma, sans; font-size: 12px; line-height: 16px; font-weight: normal; margin-top: 3px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: #000000; "><strong><em>Republished courtesy of <a href="http://"></a><a href="http://colorlines.com/article.php?ID=632" target="_blank" title="The Black Matriarch as Villain">ColorLines.com</a></em></strong></p><p class="cover_story_byline" style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, tahoma, sans; font-size: 12px; line-height: 16px; font-weight: normal; margin-top: 3px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: #000000; "><strong><br></strong></p><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="540"><tbody><tr><td colspan="3" width="540"><p class="article_body " style="margin-top: 15px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, tahoma, sans; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; font-weight: normal; color: #555555; "></p><p><img alt="" src="http://www.colorlines.com/images/precious.jpg" style="float: left; border-top-width: 2px; border-right-width: 2px; border-bottom-width: 2px; border-left-width: 2px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; border-top-color: black; border-right-color: black; border-bottom-color: black; border-left-color: black; margin-top: 2px; margin-right: 2px; margin-bottom: 2px; margin-left: 2px; "></img></p><hr size="2" width="100%"></hr><p align="right" class="pullquote" style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, tahoma, sans; font-weight: bold; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 28px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; width: 192px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 22px; color: #a56c69; float: left; ">"Precious" is a haunting film that stays silent on how the political realities of 1980s Harlem shaped women.</p><br><p></p><font color="#000000"><span style="font-size: 14px; "><br><br><br><br><br><br>Clareece ‘Precious’ Jones (Gabourey Sidibe) is the shining star of her own imagination in the new movie </span><em><span style="font-size: 15px; ">Precious</span></em><span style="font-size: 15px; ">, which hits theaters nationwide on November 6.  Surrounded by bright lights and flashing cameras, she’s a magazine cover model with dreams of being in music videos and having a light-skinned love interest. The only thing she has to overcome are her circumstances—and boy, are there plenty of hurdles ahead of her.  </span></font><p></p><font color="#000000"><span style="font-size: 15px; ">The recipe is familiar: Start with an unfailingly tragic character, pile on the hardships, throw a few famous names on the credits, then sit back and watch the Oscar nominations roll in. <br><br><p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-family: Palatino; font-size: 24px; "><span style="color: #6000bf; font-size: 24px; "><span style="color: #0000bf; ">[B]eneath the film was something that I found to be problematic: </span></span></span></strong></p><p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-family: Palatino; font-size: 24px; "><span style="color: #6000bf; font-size: 24px; "><span style="color: #0000bf; ">a reliance on the villainization of Black matriarch</span></span></span></strong></p><p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-family: Palatino; font-size: 24px; "><span style="color: #6000bf; font-size: 24px; "><span style="color: #0000bf; ">—rather than a mention of systemic race issues—</span></span></span></strong></p><p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-family: Palatino; font-size: 24px; "><span style="color: #6000bf; font-size: 24px; "><span style="color: #0000bf; ">to make the larger message of “pulling yourself up by your bootstraps” more palatable.</span></span><br></span></strong></p></span><em><p style="text-align: center;"><font size="4"><span style="font-size: 15px;"><br></span></font></p><span style="font-size: 15px; ">Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire </span></em><span style="font-size: 15px; ">could have been just another one film championing the underdog, but the powerful performances and unabashedly raw storytelling saves it from falling through the cracks.</span></font><p></p><font color="#000000"><span style="font-size: 15px; ">Precious is pregnant, illiterate, unloved and unwanted. Her mother, Mary, (played to chilling, cruel perfection by Mo’Nique) works harder at destroying her daughter’s self-esteem than she does anything else. Precious silently endures unbridled physical and sexual abuse at home, only to experience the ridicule of her peers at school and around Harlem.  </span></font><p></p><font color="#000000"><span style="font-size: 15px; ">It’s a wonder that anyone could survive the sort of utter despair that Precious lives in every day, but despite being illiterate in the ninth grade, she excels in math and is encouraged by a concerned teacher to pursue an alternative education during her pregnancy—a suggestion that her mother meets with a better one: to start collecting welfare and not to worry about education.</span></font><p></p><font color="#000000"><span style="font-size: 15px; ">Luckily, Precious escapes academic purgatory and enrolls in an alternative school for pregnant students, where she meets a series of nurturing figures who instill in her the sense of love and self-worth that was absent from her household for 16 years.  In addition to her teacher and mentor Ms. Rain (played by Paula Patton), there’s her classroom of tough-yet-supportive peers, and Lenny Kravitz as a nurse who shows her what is likely the most positive male role model that she has seen in her young life.  </span></font><p></p><font color="#000000"><span style="font-size: 15px; ">There has already been considerable Oscar buzz surrounding both Mo’Nique and Sidibe, and the film has received numerous accolades, including the Grand Jury Prize for the Dramatic category at Sundance and the People’s Choice Award at the Toronto International Film Festival. The actors and director Lee Daniels deserve the praise they’ve received for making such a powerful movie.  </span></font><p></p><font color="#000000"><span style="font-size: 15px; ">But beneath the film was something that I found to be problematic: a reliance on the villainization of Black matriarch—rather than a mention of systemic race issues—to make the larger message of “pulling yourself up by your bootstraps” more palatable.  </span></font><p></p><font color="#000000"><span style="font-size: 15px; ">This is a problematic image to see in white media, but it’s even more disheartening to see in examples of Black media. What’s so problematic about Mary is that the woman is made into a monster with no redeemable qualities—a decision that isn’t only lazy on behalf of the filmmakers, but also wholly irresponsible to the African-American community.</span></font><p></p><font color="#000000"><span style="font-size: 15px; ">But director Lee Daniels makes the critical mistake of ignoring the social and political reality that his characters inhabit.  Besides a title card in the beginning of the film and some outdated hairstyles, we as the audience see little of the forces that compel Mary’s actions. To ignore 1987 Harlem as the foundation for the permanent Black underclass created by the Reagan Administration through its abhorrent social reform policies—including the War on Drugs and welfare reform—is to ignore a crucial aspect of his characters’ lives.  </span></font><p></p><font color="#000000"><span style="font-size: 15px; ">The political forces at work during the period operated in a much larger scope than the familial level portrayed in the film.  And that’s why it was a grievous error for Daniels to paint a portrait of Mary as a one-dimensional demon, seemingly devoid of any ounce of compassion toward even her own offspring.</span></font></td></tr></tbody></table></span><p><font color="#666666"><span style="font-size: medium; line-height: normal;"><a href="http://"></a><a href="http://"></a><a href="http://colorlines.com/article.php?ID=632&amp;p=2" target="_blank" title="The Black Matriarch as Villain"><span style="font-size: 15px; ">Read more</span></a></span></font></p>]]></content:encoded><description>"[B]eneath the film ["Precious'] was something that I found to be problematic: 
a reliance on the villainization of Black matriarch—rather than a mention of systemic race issues—
to make the larger message of “pulling yourself up by your bootstraps” more palatable." --Juell Stewart</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/11/precious-portrays-the-black-matriarch-as-villain.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The more things change, . . .</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/UA_Hj7TTy7Y/the-more-things-change-.html</link><category>Elections/Campaigns/Voting</category><category>ObamaWatch</category><category>Politics</category><category>African-Americans</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>apathy</category><category>ballot</category><category>Blacks</category><category>campaigns</category><category>elections</category><category>GOTV</category><category>Obama</category><category>Philadelphia</category><category>politics</category><category>turn-out</category><category>voters</category><category>voting</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:14:30 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a653919f970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>Last year at my polling place in perhaps the bluest dot in the entire state of Pennsylvania moments before scores of people, young and old would cast their votes for this historic presidential election.</p><p><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6a8fe6a970c-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="display: inline;"><img alt="6a00d8341c0dc653ef010535d1ffa7970b-320wi" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6a8fe6a970c " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6a8fe6a970c-320wi"></img></a> <br> </p><p><a href="http://www.afro-netizen.com/2008/11/a-not-so-typical-election-day-in-mt-airy-philadelphia.html" target="_blank" title="A not-so-typical election day in Mt. Airy, Philadelphia">This</a> is what I wrote then.</p><p>The same polling place yesterday morning . . .</p><p><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6a8fe2e970c-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="display: inline;"><img alt="IMG_1657" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6a8fe2e970c " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6a8fe2e970c-320wi"></img></a> <br> </p><p>They say young people are our future. But who is our present? Well, on the electoral front, the only folks who you can count on rain or shine are our elders who know just how hard-fought our right to vote was.</p><p>Here in Philadelphia, we elected this city's very first <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/news/state/pennsylvania/20091103_ap_philadelphiaelectsfirstblackdistrictattorney.html" target="_blank" title="Philadelphia elects first black district attorney">District Attorney</a> of color. But at a <a href="http://whyy.org/cms/news/government-politics/2009/11/04/voter-turnout-in-philadelphia-12/21849" target="_blank" title="WHYY: Voter turnout in Philadelphia 12%">paltry</a> <strong>12% voter turn-out </strong>meant that probably fewer than one in 20 adults actually had anything to do with it in this city, 45% of whose population is Black.</p>]]></content:encoded><description>Last year at my polling place in perhaps the bluest dot in the entire state of Pennsylvania moments before scores of people, young and old would cast their votes for this historic presidential election. This is what I wrote then. The same polling place yesterday morning . . . They say young people are our future. But who is our present? Well, on the electoral front, the only folks who you can count on rain or shine are our elders who know just how hard-fought our right to vote was. Here in Philadelphia, we elected this city's very first District Attorney of color. But at a paltry 12% voter turn-out meant that probably fewer than one in 20 adults actually had anything to do with it in this city, 45% of whose population is Black.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/11/the-more-things-change-.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Teacher's candid Washington Post column casts more heat than light on the plight of Black students</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/T6K-1toKL6g/teachers-candid-washington-post-column-casts-more-heat-than-light-on-the-plight-of-black-students.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Family</category><category>Parenting</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Youth/Children</category><category>African Americans</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>Blacks</category><category>disadvantaged</category><category>education</category><category>high school</category><category>income inequality</category><category>kids</category><category>minorities</category><category>Patrick Welsh</category><category>racism</category><category>structural inequality</category><category>teaching</category><category>urban</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:28:28 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a693102c970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;"><strong>By Ronald Chennault</strong></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;"><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;">Patrick Welsh’s </span><span style="color: #444444;"><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/15/AR2009101503477.html" target="_blank" title="Making the Grade Isn&#39;t About Race. It&#39;s About Parents."></a><a>op/ed colu</a><a>mn</a>&#0160;</span><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;">in The W<em>ashington Post</em></span><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;">&#0160;earlier this month gets
off to a bad start—a very bad one.<span>&#0160;&#0160;</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;"><span></span>For starters, the piece’s very title (&quot;Making the Grade Isn&#39;t About Race. It&#39;s About Parents.&quot;)&#0160;signals where Welsh is headed, as
it confidently points out that the much-discussed racial achievement gap isn’t
really about race at all, but can be addressed by good parenting.<span>&#0160; </span>As if such a big problem could be
solved so simply.<span>&#0160; </span>Then comes the
first sentence of the essay, as Welsh recalls a question he had posed to his
class of predominantly Black 12<sup>th</sup>-graders: “Why don’t you guys study
like the kids from Africa?”<span>&#0160;&#0160;</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center; line-height: 150%;"><font color="#444444"><strong><span style="font-family: Palatino; font-size: 21px;"><br /></span></strong></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center; line-height: 150%;"><font color="#444444"><strong><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span style="color: #0000bf;"><span style="font-family: Palatino; font-size: 24px;">“ &#39;Why don’t you guys study like the kids from Africa?&#39; ”</span></span></span></strong><br /></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;">I
assume Welsh would defend his query borne out of “exasperation” by arguing that
he knew his students well enough to believe that they would not be offended by
it, but they—and all of us—should be insulted on many levels by such an action
by a veteran teacher.<span>&#0160; </span>And this, according
to the <em>Post</em></span><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;">’s
education columnist </span><span style="color: #444444;"><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/class-struggle/" target="_blank" title="Jay Mathews">Jay Mathews</a></span><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;">, is what passes for “provocative” and “brilliant.”</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;">But does the title of the piece really tell us what’s
inside?<span>&#0160;&#0160;</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;"><span></span>Well, the essay does open
with a discussion of parenting and its role in his students’ performance in
school.<span>&#0160; </span>Welsh’s students lament
the absence of fathers in their households or in their lives at all.<span>&#0160; </span>Those students have every right to cite
that as a factor that influences their academic performance, and it’s a
reasonable explanation.<span>&#0160; </span>Welsh goes
one step further, however: he stops quoting his students momentarily and
instead begins revealing his mind-reading ability, claiming that the students “knew
intuitively” that their failure to excel academically “had nothing to do with
race.”<span>&#0160; </span>So the kids didn’t actually
say that race doesn’t matter, but Welsh expects the reader to trust that this
is what they meant.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><font color="#444444"><br /></font></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center; line-height: 150%;"><span style="color: #444444;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;"><span style="color: #0000bf; font-family: Palatino; font-size: 21px;">&quot;. . . [T]he kids didn’t actually say that race doesn’t matter, but Welsh expects the reader to trust that this is what they meant.&quot;</span></span></strong></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><font color="#444444"><br /></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="color: #444444;">From there, the piece turns into a series of criticisms aimed at
school administrators, a group Welch is obviously not very fond of.<span>&#0160; </span>Yet, in the middle of this tangent,
Welsh actually arrives at some important points: that <strong>the gap that exists
between students who are served best by schools and those who are served the
least by them cannot just be attributed to race; that familial support and
involvement matter, but so does income inequality</strong>; and that academic achievement
is affected by factors that school leaders have little control over (but which
doesn’t keep Welsh from blaming them anyway). &#0160;</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;">So, given Welsh’s acknowledgement that multiple factors are at
work, why does he insist on reducing all of that to the simple point of
&quot;it&#39;s about parents&quot;? Why Welsh’s piece offers such a somewhat
incoherent and ultimately unconvincing argument is not clear to me.<span>&#0160;&#0160;</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;"><span></span>He does make one thing clear, however:
getting rid of out-of-touch school administrators and recruiting involved
parents would solve a lot of our problems.<span>&#0160;&#0160;</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #444444;"><span></span>If only it were that easy.<span>&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><font color="#444444"><a href="http://education.depaul.edu/EdPolicyResearch/Faculty/Faculty_Pages/Ronald_Chennault.asp" title="More on Prof. Ronald Chennault, Ph.D."><em>Prof. Ronald Chennault, Ph.D.</em></a><em> is a professor of education at DePaul University in Chicago, Illinois. Prof. Chennault&#39;s research interests include cultural studies, educational theory and policy, media analysis and race and cultural pluralism.</em></font></p></div>
]]></content:encoded><description>Welsh’s students lament the absence of fathers in their households or in their lives at all.  Those students have every right to cite that as a factor that influences their academic performance, and it’s a reasonable explanation.  Welsh goes one step further, however: he stops quoting his students momentarily and instead begins revealing his mind-reading ability, claiming that the students “knew intuitively” that their failure to excel academically “had nothing to do with race.”</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/10/teachers-candid-washington-post-column-casts-more-heat-than-light-on-the-plight-of-black-students.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Are immigrants of color being targeted for deportation?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/e7Dg09IdYHI/are-immigrants-of-color-being-targeted-for-deportation.html</link><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>ARC</category><category>ColorLines</category><category>deportation</category><category>ICE</category><category>immigrants</category><category>immigration</category><category>Obama</category><category>public policy</category><category>RaceWire</category><category>racism</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:22:00 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a689d091970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, Georgia, garamond, serif; font-size: 10px; line-height: normal; color: #333333; "><p id="articleHeading"><h1 class="title" style="font-size: 2.9em; line-height: normal; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; color: #67712a; font-weight: bold; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; padding-bottom: 3px; "><span style="color: #666666; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, Georgia, garamond, serif; font-size: 18px; ">An excerpt of ColorLines magazine’s special report on how the clampdown on immigration is tearing families apart.</span></h1></p><p id="articleContent" style="margin-top: 15px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-left: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: #999999; "><p class="article-photo " style="float: right; clear: right; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0.5em; padding-left: 0.5em; "><img alt="" class="imagecache imagecache-large-image imagecache-default imagecache-large-image_default " height="267" src="http://www.theroot.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/large-image/colorlines-deportation.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; " width="400"></img><p class="article-photo-credit " style="text-align: right; ">Getty Images</p></p><p id="node-content" style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.7em; "><p class="field field-type-text field-field-body "><p class="field-items "><p class="field-item "><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; "><strong>By Seth Wessler and Julianne Hing</strong></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; "><strong>Republished courtesy of ColorLines</strong></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; "><strong>(Cross-posted at TheRoot.com)</strong></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">One early morning five years ago, Calvin James walked outside the Jersey City apartment, where his girlfriend and 6-year-old son slept, to put the trash on the street for pickup.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">As soon as James, then 45, walked outside, he was greeted by four people jumping out of a black SUV. Dressed in uniforms with “ICE” printed on the back, they rushed him and demanded he confirm his name, then handcuffed and pulled James into the back of the SUV.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">James spent four months in immigration detention, first in New Jersey and then in Louisiana for an old conviction for selling pot. Then, he was put on a plane and deported to Jamaica, where he had not been since he was 12 years old.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; "><em>ColorLines</em> magazine went on the road tracing James’ journey from New York to Jamaica to investigate the collateral effects of deportation on immigrant communities. Harsh immigration policy, compounded by systemic racial inequities built into the criminal justice system, are not thwarting terrorists or making our country a whole lot safer. But the laws are doing a great job of breaking up another entity: families of color.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">Immigrants face de facto double jeopardy. Indeed, double punishment is now all but guaranteed in the legal landscape for non-citizens. When the Illegal Immigration Reform and Individual Responsibility Act was passed in 1996, it changed immigration policy so that non-citizens—even legal residents—who were caught in the criminal justice system for the most minor crimes became vulnerable to deportation.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">And the law was applied retroactively, so a conviction from decades earlier can trigger deportation today. After their criminal cases end, immigrants are subject to civil procedures of immigration courts. Deportation follows incarceration.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">Earlier this month, Obama administration officials <a href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/world_us/20091007_U_S__to_overhaul_immigration_system.html" style="text-decoration: none; " target="_blank">announced plans to reform immigrant detention policy</a>, ostensibly to make improvements to the broken system. The <em>New York Times</em> reported on the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/07/us/politics/07detain.html?_r=2" style="text-decoration: none; " target="_blank">detention framework’s serious flaws</a>, namely that people who have committed no crime are being swept up into the system and locked away in detention.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">Meanwhile President Obama is bolstering “Secure Communities,” which puts immigration agents in local jails, along with the 287(g) local enforcement program, a key component of President Bush’s immigration program, even as it <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-10-14-illegal-immigrants-contracts-ICE-police_N.htm" style="text-decoration: none; " target="_blank">comes under fire for widespread abuses</a>.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">Five years since his deportation, today, James lives alone in a two-room apartment in the mountains outside Montego Bay and works two jobs as a security guard and driver.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">Back in New York, his girlfriend and son were evicted from their Jersey City apartment three years after James was deported, after she lost her job. They spent time on friends’ couches and now live in a shelter in Harlem. James’ partner, Kathy, says they definitely would not have been homeless if had he remained. They might even have a home of their own.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">Even though it’s been five years since James was deported, time hasn’t seemed to ease the pain of separation.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">“I sit here sometimes, and, man, I wish I could put them on the plane and get them down here,” James says, turning over a framed picture of Kathy and their son, Josh. “It’s all kind of heartbreaking, you know.”</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">What happened to this family is no coincidence. Unfair racial inequities in the criminal justice system including harsh sentencing laws and racial profiling mean blacks and Latinos are more likely to be incarcerated, in large part, for drug convictions. They are more likely to be deported as a result.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">According to research by Tanya Golash-Boza, professor of sociology at the University of Kansas, “This disparity cannot be explained simply by higher rates of crime among Jamaican populations,” she says. “Blacks and Latinos are seen as criminals by the larger culture. Other immigrants are not.”</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">Meanwhile, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/07/us/politics/07detain.html?_r=1" style="text-decoration: none; " target="_blank">Schiro report commissioned by Homeland Security</a> reveals more than half of immigrants who get detained presumably for having committed a crime in fact had no criminal convictions. Nearly two-thirds of those picked up by local police under 287(g) had committed no crime. Thus even immigrants of color with no convictions are at risk of detention and deportation as a result of harsh enforcement policies.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">There is some reason to be hopeful that the Obama administration moves to reform immigration detention and local law enforcement officials choosing to drop participation in 287(g). But there are valid reasons to be concerned about <a href="http://www.racewire.org/archives/2009/10/white_house_raises_hopes_for_k_1.html" style="text-decoration: none; " target="_blank">whether proposed changes to the detention system will help</a> immigrants or just mean a more streamlined transition from jail to detention to exile.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">As long as immigration laws continue to criminalize non-citizens, it will be immigrants of color who bear the heaviest weight of enforcement. In the context of a criminal justice system that punishes blacks for being black, an immigration policy focused on “criminal aliens” will only mean more black parents get deported, and more families get torn apart.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; ">A just immigration policy must do better.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="font-size: 1.2em; color: #333333; "><strong><em>Julianne Hing</em></strong><em> is co-editor of the ColorLines magazine blog, <a href="http://www.racewire.org/" style="text-decoration: none; " target="_blank">RaceWire</a>, and assistant editor of <a href="http://www.colorlines.com/" style="text-decoration: none; " target="_blank">ColorLines</a>magazine.<strong> Seth Wessler</strong> is a writer and Research Associate with <a href="http://www.arc.org/" style="text-decoration: none; " target="_blank">Applied Research Center</a>. They co-authored a ColorLines magazine investigative series on families torn apart by deportation from New York to Jamaica. To read the rest of the <strong>Torn Apart</strong> article series and multimedia project, visit <a href="http://www.colorlines.com/" style="text-decoration: none; " target="_blank">ColorLines</a>.</em></p></p></p></p></p></p></span>]]></content:encoded><description>ColorLines magazine went on the road tracing James’ journey from New York to Jamaica to investigate the collateral effects of deportation on immigrant communities. Harsh immigration policy, compounded by systemic racial inequities built into the criminal justice system, are not thwarting terrorists or making our country a whole lot safer. But the laws are doing a great job of breaking up another entity: families of color.
</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/10/are-immigrants-of-color-being-targeted-for-deportation.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>America's CTO Aneesh Chopra explains the Obama Administration's reasons for supporting Internet freedom (via "net neutrality")</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/cOfs0omEU3g/americas-cto-aneesh-chopra-explains-the-obama-administrations-reasons-for-supporting-internet-freedo.html</link><category>Media/Technology</category><category>ObamaWatch</category><category>Publisher's blog</category><category>Web/Tech</category><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>civil rights</category><category>Free Press</category><category>Internet freedom</category><category>net neutrality</category><category>network neutrality</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:21:07 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a66cc18c970c</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><span style="font-weight: bold;">H/T to <a href="http://www.freepress.net/node/73814" target="_blank" title="Free Press Media Minutes for October 23, 2009">Free Press</a></span> for aggressively promoting this important civil rights initiative . . .</p>

<p></p>

<p></p>
<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2bgNmeR2WpI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2bgNmeR2WpI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425"></embed></object></div>]]></content:encoded><description>The FCC proposed new rules protecting Net Neutrality. But during the run-up to the vote, AT&amp;amp;T's chief lobbyist sent a letter to company employees asking them to weigh in against an open Internet. And a new bill in Congress could help beleaguered community TV stations across the country.</description><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/vRN-oZtFDjc/2bgNmeR2WpI&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" fileSize="1030" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The FCC proposed new rules protecting Net Neutrality. But during the run-up to the vote, AT&amp;amp;T's chief lobbyist sent a letter to company employees asking them to weigh in against an open Internet. And a new bill in Congress could help beleaguered commu</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>The Afro-Netizen</itunes:author><itunes:summary>The FCC proposed new rules protecting Net Neutrality. But during the run-up to the vote, AT&amp;amp;T's chief lobbyist sent a letter to company employees asking them to weigh in against an open Internet. And a new bill in Congress could help beleaguered community TV stations across the country.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Black,,African,American,,race,,ethnicity,,culture,,satire,,humor,,progressive,,liberal,,democrat,,diversity,,multicultural,,blog,,blogging,,Chris,Rabb,,afro,netizen,,netizen,,netroots,,new,media,,politics,,digerati</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/10/americas-cto-aneesh-chopra-explains-the-obama-administrations-reasons-for-supporting-internet-freedo.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~5/vRN-oZtFDjc/2bgNmeR2WpI&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" length="1030" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.youtube.com/v/2bgNmeR2WpI&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><title>Anti-death penalty group NCADP launches “Shouting from the Rooftops” campaign</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/bOPzZ_ktimk/antideath-penalty-group-ncadp-launches-shouting-from-the-rooftops-campaign.html</link><category>Afro-Netizen</category><category>Cameron Todd Willingham</category><category>capital punishment</category><category>Carlos De Luna</category><category>death penalty</category><category>Diann Rust-Tierney</category><category>electric chair</category><category>execution</category><category>Larry Griffin</category><category>lethal injection</category><category>NCADP</category><category>Ruben Cantu</category><category>Tom Joyner</category><category>Troy Davis</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:14:29 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6156208970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: 11px; line-height: normal; "><p class="ArticleHeadline " style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin-top: 5px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 5px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; ">By Jackie Jones</span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: 16px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><span style="font-size: 12px; "></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p><p class="ArticleHeadline " style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin-top: 5px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 5px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><span style="font-size: 16px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 12px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Originally published on </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><a href="http://www.blackamericaweb.com/?q=articles/news/moving_america_news/13498" target="_blank" title="Anti-Death Penalty Group Launches Major Campaign"><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 15px; "><span style="font-size: 12px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 12px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; ">BlackAmericaWeb.com</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></a></span></span></span></span></span></p><p class="ArticleHeadline " style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin-top: 5px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 5px; "><span style="font-size: 12px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 12px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><br></span></span></span></span></span></span></p><p id="resizeableText" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; text-align: justify; margin-right: 5px; font-size: 13px; "><span style="font-size: 12px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 12px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 11px; "><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a61561f0970b-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><span style="font-size: 13px; "><img alt="Cameron1" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a61561f0970b " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a61561f0970b-120wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;"></img></span></a> </span><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Many people recall the 1976 movie “Network” and its exhortation to open one’s window and yell, "I’m mad as hell,</span></span></span><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "> and I’m not gonna take it anymore.”<br><br>Well, the </span></span></span></span></span><a href="http://www.ncadp.org" target="_blank" title="National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty"><span style="font-size: 12px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; ">National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty</span></span></span></span></span></a><span style="font-size: 12px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 14px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "> is calling on the public to start “Shouting from the Rooftops,” its campaign to educate the public about wrongful executions and continue its push for an end to the death penalty.</span></span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: 13px; "><br><br></span></p><p id="resizeableText" style="text-align: center;margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin-right: 5px; font-size: 13px; "><span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-size: 27px; "><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 27px; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><span style="font-size: 27px; ">“Since 1973, 138 people have been released from death row who have been exonerated."</span></span></span><span style="font-size: 13px; "><br></span></span></span></p><p id="resizeableText" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; text-align: justify; margin-right: 5px; font-size: 13px; "></p><p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 13px; "><br></span></p><p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 13px; ">“Since 1973, 138 people have been released from death row who have been exonerated,” said Diann Rust-Tierney, executive director of the coalition.<br></span></p><p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 13px; ">That may seem like a huge number, but there are many others convicted under questionable circumstances who may not be granted clemency or given a commuted sentence.</span></p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">“As long as we have the death penalty, some innocent people are going to be executed,” Rust-Tierney told </span><a href="http://www.BlackAmericaWeb.com" target="_blank" title="BlackAmericaWeb.com"><span style="font-size: 13px; ">BlackAmericaWeb.com</span></a><span style="font-size: 13px; ">.<br><br>The latest campaign was inspired by the case of Cameron Todd Willingham, who was convicted of killing his children in an arson fire at their home in Corsicana, in northeast Texas. An </span><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/09/07/090907fa_fact_grann" target="_blank" title="TRIAL BY FIRE: Did Texas execute an innocent man?"><span style="font-size: 13px; ">article by David Grann</span></a><span style="font-size: 13px; "> in the Sept. 7 edition of The New Yorker magazine reviewed the case and revealed that investigators now believe the fire was accidental, possibly caused by faulty wiring in the house.<br><br>“The evidence they were relying on to say it was an intentional fire was just wrong,” Rust-Tierney said.<br><br>Shouting from the Rooftops, according to Rust-Tierney, “picks up on a statement (Supreme Court) Justice (Antonin) Scalia wrote that there has not been ‘a single case - not one - in which it is clear that a person was executed for a crime he did not commit. If such an event had occurred in recent years, we would not have to hunt for it; the innocent's name would be shouted from the rooftops.’"<br><br>“We responded with 'Innocent and Executed,' where we documented four cases - Willingham’s, Ruben Cantu, Carlos De Luna and Larry Griffin - where investigators and reporters documented they were innocent and executed,” Rust-Tierney said. “We’re taking Justice Scalia at his word and asking people to shout it from the rooftops, literally.”<br><br>NCADP is urging Shouting from the Rooftops participants to make videos of themselves alone or with friends or family literally shouting from rooftops that Willingham was innocent and executed. NCADP will post the videos on their web site and on YouTube. The </span><a href="http://bit.ly/3IR32Z" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; color: #bb0000; text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; " target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 13px; ">staff of the NCADP has already posted a video</span></a><span style="font-size: 13px; "> on YouTube, and two staff members also produced and posted a </span><a href="http://bit.ly/3vDK2E" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; color: #bb0000; text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; " target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 13px; ">“how-to-make-a-video” video</span></a><span style="font-size: 13px; ">.<br><br>The coalition’s site also has a list of other suggested activities for the public, including writing a letter to the editor of the local newspaper about the Willingham case, calling for an end to the death penalty and putting a Shouting from the Rooftops banner on their blogs or Web pages.<br><br>“Having Tom Joyner go before the (South Carolina) parole and pardons board and getting them to admit there’s been a mistake ought to inspire,” Rust-Tierney said, referring to the radio host winning a posthumous pardon Wednesday for his great-uncles who were executed in 1915 for a murder they did not commit.<br><br>“We were delighted for him, but we were also saddened that he had to do this,” she said. “But this kind of thing is still going on. “We need to alert the public that this is a real problem.</span><p></p></span>]]></content:encoded><description>“Since 1973, 138 people have been released from death row who have been exonerated,” said Diann Rust-Tierney, executive director of the coalition.

That may seem like a huge number, but there are many others convicted under questionable circumstances who may not be granted clemency or given a commuted sentence.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/10/antideath-penalty-group-ncadp-launches-shouting-from-the-rooftops-campaign.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Important genealogical lessons can be learned from the story of Michelle Obama's ancestral roots</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/ln4e-Chs26o/important-genealogical-lessons-come-from-the-story-of-michelle-obamas-ancestral-roots.html</link><category>Commentary/Opinion</category><category>Family</category><category>Genealogy/Family History</category><category>Public Policy</category><category>Race, Culture &amp; History</category><category>Atlantic Slave Trade</category><category>Blacks</category><category>family history</category><category>genealogy</category><category>Michelle Obama</category><category>Middle Passage</category><category>mulatto</category><category>National Archives</category><category>race</category><category>slavery</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:23:04 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a5e5c9f6970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: arial; font-size: 12px; "><p class="cnnEditorNote" style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; font-style: italic; "><span style="font-style: normal; "><span style="font-weight: bold;">By <a href="http://www.tonyburroughs.com/" target="_blank" title="TonyBurroughs.com">Tony Burroughs</a></span></span></p><p class="cnnEditorNote" style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; font-style: italic; "><span style="font-style: normal; "><strong>Guest Contributor</strong></span></p><p class="cnnEditorNote" style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; font-style: italic; "><span style="font-style: normal; "><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a5e5c6df970b-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="Michelle-obama-white-house-portrait" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a5e5c6df970b " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a5e5c6df970b-200wi" style="width: 200px; margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;"></img></a> Last week a New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/08/us/politics/08genealogy.html?adxnnl=1&amp;adxnnlx=1255487053-9Nuk+2CBOWnlNjId/9dhHQ" style="color: #004276; text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; " target="new">article</a> reported that Michelle Obama's great-great-great grandparents were a white man and a slave whom he impregnated. This story highlights the growing importance of genealogy in America.</span></p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">Some of the comments posted online were from people skeptical that the full story of Michelle Obama's ancestry will ever be known.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">One said, "The concept that records simply don't exist beyond the mid-1800s for so much of her family is so telling about the legacy of slavery we'll never shed."</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">Another said, "Where in Africa did <a class="cnnInlineTopic" href="http://topics.cnn.com/topics/Michelle_Obama" style="color: #004276; text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold; ">Michelle Obama's</a> ancestors come from? What was their tribe? When were they enslaved, and what were their experiences as individuals? What happened to these human beings after they were brought in chains to America? These things will very likely never be known."</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">While these may be the common perceptions of the public, they are not the views of sophisticated genealogists.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">Most people don't have a clue about all the documents that exist, and that the paper trail never ends. The amount of paper that exists in libraries, archives and historical societies is mind-boggling. Much of it isn't catalogued, so the owners don't even know what they have.</p><p style="text-align: center;margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; "><span style="font-family: Palatino; font-size: 24px; "><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 24px; font-family: Palatino; ">"Most people don't have a clue about all the documents that exist, and that the paper trail never ends."</span><br></span></p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">After recently re-inventorying records, one South Carolina repository discovered plantation records in their collection it did not know existed.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">The National Archives has 4 billion pieces of paper and a backlog of 400-500 million pages of records that need to be processed. It took an act of Congress in 2000 to microfilm records from the Freedmen's Bureau, but nine years later they are still being digitized, and indexes need to be created.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">Another bill to establish a <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-390" target="_blank" title="H.R. 390: Preservation of Records of Servitude, Emancipation, and Post-Civil War Reconstruction Act">national database of records of servitude, emancipation, and post-Civil War reconstruction records</a> at the National Archives passed the House in 2007 but failed in the Senate and died.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">There are also records in French, Spanish, Portuguese, German and Italian in the United States, Europe and Africa that contain details of our ancestors that need to be digitized, transcribed and published to solve some of our challenges.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">Fortunately, through technological advances and the efforts of volunteers and private companies, much of this hidden paper is beginning to see the light of day. These resources will enable genealogists to solve current problems in the future.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">Ancestry.com has digitized and put online over 4 billion records over the past 12 years and will be digitizing at least 5 million documents a year at the <a class="cnnInlineTopic" href="http://topics.cnn.com/topics/National_Archives_and_Records_Administration" style="color: #004276; text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold; ">National Archives</a>. Footnote.com has uploaded 60 million images online and is adding more than 1 million new records per month. The Mormon Family History Library in Salt Lake City, Utah, is digitizing its entire collection of 2.5 million reels of microfilm.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">The Atlantic Slave Trade Database contained 27,000 voyages from Africa to the New World when it debuted on a CD-ROM in 1999. Ten years later the database has almost 35,000 voyages online. There are many other institutions around the world that are doing digital projects.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">But access to billions of records will not guarantee genealogical success any more than walking into a library will make people smart. Genealogists will still need genealogical and analytical skills to solve complex problems. Success in <a class="cnnInlineTopic" href="http://topics.cnn.com/topics/Genealogy" style="color: #004276; text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold; ">genealogy</a> is based on available records, access to resources, knowledge of history, analytical ability, technical skills, genealogical skills and persistence. If any one of these ingredients is lacking, or is not of a high enough skill level, difficult genealogical challenges will go unsolved, often for years.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">African-American genealogy is still in its infancy, and methodology is still being developed. Advanced research, particularly in the slavery period, can become very complicated. Progress is often contingent on genealogy skills, painstaking research in multiple locations and using records that have not been transcribed, indexed or placed on the Internet.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">For 18 years, I had been trying to identify a slave owner for one of my ancestors six generations before mine. Before I finally solved it, I worked on the problem 12 hours a day for six straight days at the Family History Library in Salt Lake City. It took all my genealogical skills, historical knowledge, experience, patience and fortitude to.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">In some situations, the problem of mixed-race parentage is difficult to solve, in others it is not as challenging as it may appear. Once a person is listed as a "mulatto," you have evidence of white blood in the family tree. Then you have to determine the person and the generation.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">In some cases it is a simple matter of elimination, or other evidence will point to the person in question. Most research involves searching for evidence, analyzing records and sometimes amassing enough circumstantial evidence to draw conclusions.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">This should not discourage people from seeking their roots. On the contrary, it should encourage people to search. Genealogy is easy, fun and inexpensive to start. After you make progress, you'll worry about the challenges later.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">We need to demand more records be preserved and made available. But on the other hand, we need to take responsibility to preserve our own history, learn the craft of genealogy and pass the history and the craft on to our kids and grandkids.</p><p style="text-align: center;margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; "><span style="font-size: 24px; "><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 24px; font-family: Palatino; ">"We need to demand more records be preserved and made available. But . . . we [also] need to take responsibility to preserve our own history."</span></span></p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">People need to tape record their stories and record the stories of their elders. Baby boomers are beginning to die in record numbers and once they leave they take generations of oral family history with them.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">People need to label family photos and preserve family bibles, obituaries, funeral programs, letters and other paper with ancestor's names on them in their house and their relatives' houses.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">But most of all, people need to learn how to do genealogy, and stop thinking they can just jump on the Internet and trace their family history back to Africa before they log off the computer and finish their cup of coffee. If they understand the genealogical process, they'll avoid a lot of frustration.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">Books on genealogy and conferences like the <a href="http://www.blackgenealogysummit.com/faqs.html" style="color: #004276; text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; " target="new">International Black Genealogy Summit</a> at the Allen County Public Library in Fort Wayne, Indiana, October 29-31 can be helpful.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; ">Genealogical problems that we cannot solve today will be solved by our young people tomorrow. So I believe Michelle Obama's genealogy will advance by her children's -- or her grandchildren's generation.</p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; "></p><p style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; "><span style="font-style: italic; "><a href="http://www.tonyburroughs.com/" target="_blank" title="TonyBurroughs.com">Tony Burroughs</a> is a professional <a href="http://tonyburroughs.com/_wsn/page4.html" style="font-weight: bold; color: blue !important; text-decoration: underline !important; cursor: text !important; " target="new">genealogist</a> and author of "Black Roots: A Beginners Guide to Tracing the African American Family Tree." He taught genealogy at Chicago State University for 15 years.</span></p></span>]]></content:encoded><description>Last week a New York Times article reported that Michelle Obama's great-great-great grandparents were a white man and a slave whom he impregnated. This story highlights the growing importance of genealogy in America.

Some of the comments posted online were from people skeptical that the full story of Michelle Obama's ancestry will ever be known.

One said, "The concept that records simply don't exist beyond the mid-1800s for so much of her family is so telling about the legacy of slavery we'll never shed."

Another said, "Where in Africa did Michelle Obama's ancestors come from? What was their tribe? When were they enslaved, and what were their experiences as individuals? What happened to these human beings after they were brought in chains to America? These things will very likely never be known."

While these may be the common perceptions of the public, they are not the views of sophisticated genealogists.

Most people don't have a clue about all the documents that exist, and that the paper trail never ends. The amount of paper that exists in libraries, archives and historical societies is mind-boggling. Much of it isn't catalogued, so the owners don't even know what they have.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/10/important-genealogical-lessons-come-from-the-story-of-michelle-obamas-ancestral-roots.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Desperate Republicans Rebrand As Party Of No White Men</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Afro-netizen/~3/SIwWcocC0BQ/desperate-republicans-rebrand-as-party-of-no-white-men.html</link><category>Civil War</category><category>GOP</category><category>minorities</category><category>people of color</category><category>politics</category><category>race</category><category>Reconstruction</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">podcast@afro-netizen.com (The Afro-Netizen)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:24:35 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a5e1f01c970b</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6387cd6970c-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="display: inline;"><img alt="GOPfaces1" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6387cd6970c " src="http://afronetizen.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c0dc653ef0120a6387cd6970c-500wi"></img></a></span></p><p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"></span><strong>H/T to writer <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/joe-weisenthal" target="_blank" title="About Joe Weisenthal">Joe Weisenthal</a> of <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/desperate-republicans-rebrand-as-party-of-no-white-men-2009-10#lady-with-a-colorful-shirt-1" target="_blank" title="Desperate Republicans Rebrand As Party Of No White Men">BusinessInsider.com</a> for this gem:</strong></p><blockquote><span style="color: #0000bf;">In an effort to spice up its image, the Republican Party has relaunched GOP.com.<br><br>And to spice things up, the top left prominently features new faces of the GOP. Each time you refresh the page, you get a new face.<br><br>See if you can find a <strong><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/desperate-republicans-rebrand-as-party-of-no-white-men-2009-10#lady-with-a-colorful-shirt-1" target="_blank" title="Spoiler: No white boys!">pattern</a></strong></span><p><span style="color: #0000bf;">Here's a hint. We're not seeing anyone who looks like Glenn Beck in there!<span style="text-decoration: underline;"></span></span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br> </span>  </p></blockquote><p></p><p></p><p></p>]]></content:encoded><description>Joe Weisenthal:    

In an effort to spice up its image, the Republican Party has relaunched GOP.com.

    And to spice things up, the top left prominently features new faces of the GOP. Each time you refresh the page, you get a new face.

    See if you can find a pattern

    Here's a hint. We're not seeing anyone who looks like Glenn Beck in there!</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.afro-netizen.com/2009/10/desperate-republicans-rebrand-as-party-of-no-white-men.html</feedburner:origLink></item><copyright>© 2006 Afro-Netizen All rights reserved</copyright><media:credit role="author">The Afro-Netizen</media:credit><media:rating>nonadult</media:rating></channel></rss>
