<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://wakingtiger.libsyn.com/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		<title>The Academic Evolution Podcast</title>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:35:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Libsyn WebEngine 2.0</generator>
		<link>http://wakingtigerlibsyn.com</link>
		<language>en</language>
		<copyright><![CDATA[creative commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0]]></copyright>
		<docs>http://wakingtigerlibsyn.com</docs>
		<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Rethinking knowledge and its institutions in the age of new media. The podcast for Gideon Burton's blog, www.AcademicEvolution.com]]></itunes:summary>
		
		<itunes:author></itunes:author>
		<itunes:image href="http://static.libsyn.com/p/assets/d/9/0/5/d9055bf3d396f9ea/soapy.jpg" />
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<description><![CDATA[Rethinking knowledge and its institutions in the age of new media. The podcast for Gideon Burton's blog, www.AcademicEvolution.com]]></description>
		<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[]]></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
				<item>
			<title>Interview with Michèle Lamont</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://wakingtiger.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=478856#]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://..libsynpro.com/interview-with-mich-le-lamont]]></link>
			<itunes:image href="http://static.libsyn.com/p/assets/d/9/0/5/d9055bf3d396f9ea/soapy.jpg" />
			<description><![CDATA[<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span>In this interview with Michèle Lamont, Harvard Professor of Sociology, we discuss her new book, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/LAMHOW.html">How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment</a>
(Harvard, 2009). How professors judge the quality and significance of
scholarship depends upon disciplinary standards not always consistent
with one another, rhetorical strategies of those submitting and
reviewing scholarship, and the pragmatic constraints of review
processes that together form the dynamic culture and "technology" of
evaluation in higher education. Lamont brings greater transparency to
these standards and processes. We specifically discuss a set of key
standards that academics across disciplines gravitate toward in making
their judgments. These include clarity, quality, originality,
significance, methods, and feasibility.<br/>
<br/>
Even academics may register surprise at how these standards are
understood and weighted so diversely across disciplines, and yet Lamont
shows how professors transcend differences and arrive at workable and
reliable decisions. My more complete review of the book will follow. <br/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ In this interview with Michèle Lamont, Harvard Professor of Sociology, we discuss her new book, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/LAMHOW.html">How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment</a>
(Harvard, 2009). How professors judge the quality and significance of
scholarship depends upon disciplinary standards not always consistent
with one another, rhetorical strategies of those submitting and
reviewing scholarship, and the pragmatic constraints of review
processes that together form the dynamic culture and "technology" of
evaluation in higher education. Lamont brings greater transparency to
these standards and processes. We specifically discuss a set of key
standards that academics across disciplines gravitate toward in making
their judgments. These include clarity, quality, originality,
significance, methods, and feasibility.

Even academics may register surprise at how these standards are
understood and weighted so diversely across disciplines, and yet Lamont
shows how professors transcend differences and arrive at workable and
reliable decisions. My more complete review of the book will follow. ]]></content:encoded>
			<itunes:keywords>review,peer,scholarship,academia</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[ In this interview with Michèle Lamont, Harvard Professor of Sociology, we discuss her new book, 
(Harvard, 2009). How professors judge the quality and significance of
scholarship depends upon disciplinary standards not always consistent
with...]]></itunes:subtitle>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Open Access and the Institutional Repository</title>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://wakingtiger.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=430924#]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://..libsynpro.com/open-access-and-the-institutional-repository]]></link>
			<itunes:image href="http://static.libsyn.com/p/assets/d/9/0/5/d9055bf3d396f9ea/soapy.jpg" />
			<description><![CDATA[In this interview with BYU Scholarly Communications Librarian Jeff
Belliston, we discuss how Open Access can bring broader impact and
exposure for scholarship--especially if scholars will preserve
copyright so they can deposit their work in an institutional repository
like <a href="http://lib.byu.edu/sites/scholarsarchive/">BYU's ScholarsArchive</a> or the more developed <a href="http://podcast%20/#004:%20Open%20Access%20and%20the%20Institutional%20Repository">DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska-Lincoln</a>.
I play devil's advocate with my librarain friend, suggesting that
however noble the goal of spreading one's scholarship to the world, the
practical reality is that scholars are really only motivated to reach
that small but influential audience, their peers. <br/>
<br/>
I've <a href="http://gideonburton.typepad.com/gideon_burtons_blog/open-access/">blogged quite a bit about Open Access</a>, and Jeff Belliston and I have given many <a href="http://gideonburton.typepad.com/gideon_burtons_blog/2008/10/open-access-open-teaching-and-prospects-for-the-institutional-repository-in-academia.html">presentations about Open Access</a>
to the leadership and faculty of Brigham Young University (under the
auspices of University Librarian Randy Olson and with the encouragement
of BYU's Academic Vice President's office). It has been exciting to see
this new and vital way of thinking about scholarship starting to take
root on our campus. You can view one of our presentations on <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/wakingtiger/opening-our-scholarship-presentation">SlideShare</a>. Those wishing to keep tabs on Open Access should subscribe to <a href="http://www.earlham.edu/%7Epeters/fos/fosblog.html">Peter Suber's Open Access News</a> blog.<br/>
<br/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this interview with BYU Scholarly Communications Librarian Jeff
Belliston, we discuss how Open Access can bring broader impact and
exposure for scholarship--especially if scholars will preserve
copyright so they can deposit their work in an institutional repository
like <a href="http://lib.byu.edu/sites/scholarsarchive/">BYU's ScholarsArchive</a> or the more developed <a href="http://podcast%20/#004:%20Open%20Access%20and%20the%20Institutional%20Repository">DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska-Lincoln</a>.
I play devil's advocate with my librarain friend, suggesting that
however noble the goal of spreading one's scholarship to the world, the
practical reality is that scholars are really only motivated to reach
that small but influential audience, their peers. 

I've <a href="http://gideonburton.typepad.com/gideon_burtons_blog/open-access/">blogged quite a bit about Open Access</a>, and Jeff Belliston and I have given many <a href="http://gideonburton.typepad.com/gideon_burtons_blog/2008/10/open-access-open-teaching-and-prospects-for-the-institutional-repository-in-academia.html">presentations about Open Access</a>
to the leadership and faculty of Brigham Young University (under the
auspices of University Librarian Randy Olson and with the encouragement
of BYU's Academic Vice President's office). It has been exciting to see
this new and vital way of thinking about scholarship starting to take
root on our campus. You can view one of our presentations on <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/wakingtiger/opening-our-scholarship-presentation">SlideShare</a>. Those wishing to keep tabs on Open Access should subscribe to <a href="http://www.earlham.edu/%7Epeters/fos/fosblog.html">Peter Suber's Open Access News</a> blog.
]]></content:encoded>
			<itunes:keywords>open,education,institutional,higher,publishing,access,academic,repository</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this interview with BYU Scholarly Communications Librarian Jeff
Belliston, we discuss how Open Access can bring broader impact and
exposure for scholarship--especially if scholars will preserve
copyright so they can deposit their work in an...]]></itunes:subtitle>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Blogging in College Writing Instruction</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://wakingtiger.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=426716#]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://..libsynpro.com/blogging-in-college-writing-instruction]]></link>
			<itunes:image href="http://static.libsyn.com/p/assets/d/9/0/5/d9055bf3d396f9ea/soapy.jpg" />
			<description><![CDATA[Student instructor Kathy Cowley describes why and how she is having her students use blogging in her writing class at Brigham Young University. Is blogging a legitimate kind of writing instruction? What are its advantages and limits? <br/><br/>Kathy refers to Geoffrey Sirc's "Box-Logic."  <i>Writing New Media: Theory and Applications for Expanding the Teaching of Composition</i>. Logan: Utah State University Press, 2004. 43-66.<br/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Student instructor Kathy Cowley describes why and how she is having her students use blogging in her writing class at Brigham Young University. Is blogging a legitimate kind of writing instruction? What are its advantages and limits? Kathy refers to Geoffrey Sirc's "Box-Logic."  <i>Writing New Media: Theory and Applications for Expanding the Teaching of Composition</i>. Logan: Utah State University Press, 2004. 43-66.]]></content:encoded>
			<itunes:keywords>writing,blogging,college</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Student instructor Kathy Cowley describes why and how she is having her students use blogging in her writing class at Brigham Young University. Is blogging a legitimate kind of writing instruction? What are its advantages and limits? Kathy refers to...]]></itunes:subtitle>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Facebook Experiment</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://wakingtiger.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=424381#]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://..libsynpro.com/the-facebook-experiment]]></link>
			<itunes:image href="http://static.libsyn.com/p/assets/d/9/0/5/d9055bf3d396f9ea/soapy.jpg" />
			<description><![CDATA[<a style="float: right;" href="http://"><img class="at-xid-6a00d834555fde69e2010536e69b3d970c yui-img" alt="Eng251-Facebook2" src="http://gideonburton.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834555fde69e2010536e69b3d970c-320wi" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px; width: 159px; height: 152px;"/></a>
 Using facebook in a literature class is the subject of my second
episode of the Academic Evolution Podcast. With Stephen Humphrey I
discuss the merits and limits of using this popular online social
networking service for teaching and learning. Students are sharing and
interacting in ways they would not have, but also seem to see the
medium as too informal for serious work and are at times afraid to put
their work "out there" where it can be seen by peers. We agree that our
role as educators is to refine the use of the medium that the students
are already using.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a style="float: right;" href="http://"></a>
 Using facebook in a literature class is the subject of my second
episode of the Academic Evolution Podcast. With Stephen Humphrey I
discuss the merits and limits of using this popular online social
networking service for teaching and learning. Students are sharing and
interacting in ways they would not have, but also seem to see the
medium as too informal for serious work and are at times afraid to put
their work "out there" where it can be seen by peers. We agree that our
role as educators is to refine the use of the medium that the students
are already using.]]></content:encoded>
			<itunes:keywords>and,new,facebook,education,media,teaching,learning</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Using facebook in a literature class is the subject of my second
episode of the Academic Evolution Podcast. With Stephen Humphrey I
discuss the merits and limits of using this popular online social
networking service for teaching and learning....]]></itunes:subtitle>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Welcome to the Academic Evolution Podcast</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://wakingtiger.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=422935#]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://..libsynpro.com/welcome-to-the-academic-evolution-podcast]]></link>
			<itunes:image href="http://static.libsyn.com/p/assets/d/9/0/5/d9055bf3d396f9ea/soapy.jpg" />
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This is the podcast accompanying Gideon Burton's <a href="http://www.academicevolution.com">Academic Evolution</a> blog and book project. For the inaugural Academic Evolution podcast, I invite you to listen in on my conversation with Stephen Humphrey. Highlights:</p>

<p><b>Publish first, then perfect ideas socially</b></p>

<ul>
  <li>0:29 - "Am I ready for unvarnished thoughts?" (The virtue of
getting your thoughts "out there" where others can help you develop
them. Later he compares this to old school craftsmanship and the
apprentice model.)</li>
  <li>1:42 - Gideon describes the print paradigm of pre-publication perfection and how that is out of sync.</li>
  <li>3:30 "I'm going to respect that the value I bring to my product is
whatever skill set I have with the interpretive effect of the people
who are going to use it...Those people bring to the table a critical
eye." (Stephen)</li>
</ul>


<p><b>Today's "Renaissance Student" constructs him/herself independent of academia</b> (3:53)</p>

<ul>
  <li>"Academia is no longer the game changer" (4:57)</li>
  <li>"Educated thought has started to bypass higher ed" (5:46) </li>
  <li>"whiplash effect as academic leaders...suddenly realize that students have bypassed the institution" (6:12)</li>
  <li>"I think I'm doing college as a back up plan." Story of student,
Michael (6:28), whose digital skills are so marketable he wonders why
he's finishing his BA.</li>
</ul>


<p><b>Reputation systems now challenge academic credentialing</b> (12:24)</p>

<ul>
  <li>"An 18 year-old can develop a reputation and a track record and an audience for his thoughts and work" (12:44)</li>
  <li>A modern apprenticeship model: "I'll develop my talents at the feet
of the consumer, of the people who will be critical of my work and show
me through their attention whether I'm hitting the right notes." (13:20)</li>
  <li>"Digi-cred" coined to name online reputation. (14:24). Gideon references Phil Windley's work on reputation systems.</li>
  <li>"I'm not depending on others to determine for me what the
reputation of someone is....What I'm looking for are those gateway
people who can regularly feed me little tidbits until I can trust their
judgments....It takes a history with them" (16:39)</li>
</ul>


<p><b>New literacies and their chances in K-12 vs. Higher Ed</b></p>

<ul>
  <li>"My kids are stuck with a model that says they need to learn
PowerPoint, but that's the last thing they need. They need to be taught
the social implications of technology" (18:40)</li>
  <li>Gideon more hopeful for K-12 because of progress made toward 21st Century Literacies (19:07).</li>
  <li>If raised to believe all their opinions matter, will students become sufficiently self critical? (20:52)</li>
  <li>"How can we teach crafstmanship in thought?" (22:35)</li>
</ul>


<p><b>Does digital expression resist or assist critical thought? </b>(24:47)</p>

<ul>
  <li>"They and we express ourselves too well for the anemic level of thought we've brought to that expression" (24:55)</li>
  <li>"As students become more involved in the creative media...there is
an evolution of critical thought that happens socially." (25:17)</li>
  <li>"The medium has a feedback mechanism, and when they hear the echo
of their own silly voices, it gets amplified enough that they start
self correcting." (27:45)</li>
  <li>Youth use of cell phones may seem inane, but in "pinging" each
other, they are "establishing the synaptic routes of complex
interaction essential to any high level order of intelligence" (31:10)<br/>
  </li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the podcast accompanying Gideon Burton's <a href="http://www.academicevolution.com">Academic Evolution</a> blog and book project. For the inaugural Academic Evolution podcast, I invite you to listen in on my conversation with Stephen Humphrey. Highlights:</p>

<p><b>Publish first, then perfect ideas socially</b></p>

<ul>
  <li>0:29 - "Am I ready for unvarnished thoughts?" (The virtue of
getting your thoughts "out there" where others can help you develop
them. Later he compares this to old school craftsmanship and the
apprentice model.)</li>
  <li>1:42 - Gideon describes the print paradigm of pre-publication perfection and how that is out of sync.</li>
  <li>3:30 "I'm going to respect that the value I bring to my product is
whatever skill set I have with the interpretive effect of the people
who are going to use it...Those people bring to the table a critical
eye." (Stephen)</li>
</ul>


<p><b>Today's "Renaissance Student" constructs him/herself independent of academia</b> (3:53)</p>

<ul>
  <li>"Academia is no longer the game changer" (4:57)</li>
  <li>"Educated thought has started to bypass higher ed" (5:46) </li>
  <li>"whiplash effect as academic leaders...suddenly realize that students have bypassed the institution" (6:12)</li>
  <li>"I think I'm doing college as a back up plan." Story of student,
Michael (6:28), whose digital skills are so marketable he wonders why
he's finishing his BA.</li>
</ul>


<p><b>Reputation systems now challenge academic credentialing</b> (12:24)</p>

<ul>
  <li>"An 18 year-old can develop a reputation and a track record and an audience for his thoughts and work" (12:44)</li>
  <li>A modern apprenticeship model: "I'll develop my talents at the feet
of the consumer, of the people who will be critical of my work and show
me through their attention whether I'm hitting the right notes." (13:20)</li>
  <li>"Digi-cred" coined to name online reputation. (14:24). Gideon references Phil Windley's work on reputation systems.</li>
  <li>"I'm not depending on others to determine for me what the
reputation of someone is....What I'm looking for are those gateway
people who can regularly feed me little tidbits until I can trust their
judgments....It takes a history with them" (16:39)</li>
</ul>


<p><b>New literacies and their chances in K-12 vs. Higher Ed</b></p>

<ul>
  <li>"My kids are stuck with a model that says they need to learn
PowerPoint, but that's the last thing they need. They need to be taught
the social implications of technology" (18:40)</li>
  <li>Gideon more hopeful for K-12 because of progress made toward 21st Century Literacies (19:07).</li>
  <li>If raised to believe all their opinions matter, will students become sufficiently self critical? (20:52)</li>
  <li>"How can we teach crafstmanship in thought?" (22:35)</li>
</ul>


<p><b>Does digital expression resist or assist critical thought? </b>(24:47)</p>

<ul>
  <li>"They and we express ourselves too well for the anemic level of thought we've brought to that expression" (24:55)</li>
  <li>"As students become more involved in the creative media...there is
an evolution of critical thought that happens socially." (25:17)</li>
  <li>"The medium has a feedback mechanism, and when they hear the echo
of their own silly voices, it gets amplified enough that they start
self correcting." (27:45)</li>
  <li>Youth use of cell phones may seem inane, but in "pinging" each
other, they are "establishing the synaptic routes of complex
interaction essential to any high level order of intelligence" (31:10)
  </li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<itunes:keywords>and,new,education,media,teaching,learning</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This is the podcast accompanying Gideon Burton's  blog and book project. For the inaugural Academic Evolution podcast, I invite you to listen in on my conversation with Stephen Humphrey. Highlights:

Publish first, then perfect ideas socially


 ...]]></itunes:subtitle>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
