Among other things, they talk about:

- How recruiting representative users is the only place you shouldn't skimp in a usability test � everything else is negotiable and can be done on the cheap.
- That even though some studies have found that many don't use breadcrumbs, Jakob finds them useful because they are lightweight design elements, harmless to those not using them.
- That it's ok with Jakob that designers make hard-to-use artistic websites when they don't serve a utilitarian purpose.

What sets this tool apart from all the others is that it's skinnable - that is, you can change the look and feel of you prototype. Currently, it provides Windows, Mac, hand-drawn and a schematic wireframe theme.

The tool runs on Windows, Mac OS X, Linux and Solaris.

Though the participants were confused when simple questions, such as a person's name, were marked "correct", he found that they were faster, more successful, less error-prone, and more satisfied when they used a form with inline validation.

Also, giving feedback after the particpants finished typing - rather than while they were typing - helped the participants complete the forms more quickly.

- If the Design is a Good One, You Don't Need to Test It
- People Don't Change
- Design to Avoid Clicks
- UX Design Stops at the Edges of the Product
- If you Have Great Search, You Don't Need Great Information Architecture
- Can't Decide? Make it a Preference
- Design Always with Implementation in Mind
- People Know What They Like
- People Read
- The Design Has to be Original